Olsen City Planning Office Northfield City Hall

Page 1 of 3

Tracy Davis From:

Clifford E. Clark, Jr. [[email protected]]

Sent:

Monday, May 04, 2009 9:34 PM

To:

Tracy Davis

Cc:

Mike Meehan; [email protected]; Erik Hong; Daniel Jones; Darin Pavek; William Ostrem; Lynn Bruns; Jay Jasnoch; Leota Goodney; Steven Pahs; Steve Schmidt; William (Pepe) Kryzda; David Van Wylen; Bruce Anderson; Peter Schmelzer; [email protected]

Subject: Re: Interesting link, and info for Friday's LUAG meeting

Hello everyone: Following up on Tracy's suggestion, here's a copy of the note that I sent to Dan earlier on typos and other inconsistencies. Cliff April 21, 2009 Mr. Dan Olsen City Planning Office Northfield City Hall Northfield, Mn 55057 Dear Dan: Given the fact that the Advisory Committee has a limited time to review the 272 pages of the draft of the Northfield, Minnesota, Land Development Code, I am sending my comments on places where the code is unclear and on typos in this letter. Please circulate it to the other members of the committee. My comments are listed by code section: 2.4.2, A 2 The sentence refers to the “framework map” but it should be changed to the actual map title which should read “Official Zoning Map”. 2.4.2.B, 1 ( b) To be consistent and clear, in the first sentence which reads “For the purpose of this section, the Perimeter Transition Area (PTA) shall be defined as a 300-foot wide area at the boundaries of the CD-S zone district that are not adjacent to the CD-S district” would be clearer if it read “… shall be defined as any place within the CDS district that is within 300 feet of any boundary.” In the third section in this section, the term “the area” at the end of the sentence would be clearer if the area were specified. I would suggest that it read “the area owned by the college adjacent to the right of way” “may develop consistent with the IDA standards.” 2.4.2 B (2)(d) Additional Design Standards, (d) Athletic field lighting. The phrases “not be exempt” and “may not utilize the exemption” do not make sense. How can the college not utilize the exemption if it is not exempt in the first place? So the intention of this sentence is not clear. 2.4.2 C (4) typo? This sentence does not make sense unless the phrase “is required” is deleted. The

5/7/2009

Page 2 of 3

sentence, as corrected, should read: “If a traffic and stormwater management plan is not completed during the rezoning process, such plans shall be required as part of any future site plan approval for a new structure.” 2.11.4, G Temporary Structures, What does the word “institutional” mean in the phrase “temporary structures serving public or institutional uses . . .” ? 3.1.5,A (2) The term “other projections” in the phrase “Eaves and other projections” is not clear. Does it mean eves and other “roof” projections? 3.5.2 (A) Applicability To be consistent here, since these standards apply to R1-B districts, they should also apply to proposed infill development or redevelopment in the PTA of the CD-S (in the Perimeter Transition Area of the College Development Zone). 4.8.2 Violations and Penalties. This section is not clear. The penalty for a first violation is “a fourth degree misdemeanor” and the penalty for subsequent violations is the same. Shouldn’t someone who violates the code multiple times be subject to stronger penalties if he or she continues to do so? If repeated abuse brings no harsher penalties, scofflaws with continue to violate the code. 5.3.5 Neighborhood meetings This section places the reporting responsibility on the applicant. Should the applicant not notify the neighbors, the city planner should have the responsibility to notify them so that they can learn about the intended development project. 5.4.5 (B) This section refers to “any city recognized neighborhood associations”. Is the any place in the code that specifies how a neighborhood association get recognized by the city? 5.5.3 (i) “Multi-family buildings with eight or more units.” Wouldn’t this phrase be more accurate if it read “residential buildings with eight or more units” because the building could house no families and only single persons? 5.5.9 (D) (2) This sentence would be clearer if it read “The following standards shall be ‘applied’ … rather than “shall be considered” since the former meaning seems to be what is intended. 5.5.9 (D) (2) (j) To be consistent, this should read “In residential districts ‘and in Perimeter Transition Areas of College Development Zones’” , “the use of a similar height, building orientation . . . .” The PTA and CD-S need to be referenced here as well. In the last section on definitions, it would be helpful in “Build to Line” definition to clarify the relationship of build to lines and setbacks. It seems that ‘Build to lines’ refer to the relationship of the building to the front and back lot lines while the setbacks can also reference the distance of the building from the side lot lines. Or is that not accurate? Typo (FAA) is the Federal Aviation Administration, not the Federal Aeronautical Administration. Sincerely, Cliff Clark -Clifford E. Clark, Jr. Professor of History & M.A. & A.D. Hulings Professor of American Studies

5/7/2009

Page 3 of 3

Carleton College One North College Street Northfield, MN 55057

5/7/2009