National Biotechnology Development Agency (NABDA) (Federal Ministry of Science and Technology) 16, Dunukofia Street (Old CAC Building), Area 11, Garki Abuja
State and Application of Bioremediation in Nigeria’s Oil Fields Presenter: PROF. B. O. SOLOMON DIRECTOR-GENERAL (NABDA) Venue : NICON LUXURY HOTEL ABUJA APRIL 1-3, 2009 NABDA (c)2009
ENC
1
Outline: Introduction Bioremediation Efforts at Bioremediation Application State of Bioremediation Technology Lab-Scale Operations Field-Scale Operations Indigenous bioremediation products for: – – – – –
Drill Cuttings Management Produce Water Management Flare Pit Waste Mnagement Soil Hydrocarbon Pollution Management Way forward
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
2
Introduction Human economic activities have always given rise to need for further activities to ameliorate the resulting adverse effects on the environment. This dimension suggests that man has not completely been unaware of environmental impacts of the quest for human survival, which draws energy and nutrients from the earth. The angle that has remained unsatisfactorily addressed is the choice of mitigation technology that can return mother earth to status quo ante or guarantee continuous availability of directly utilized resources or associated support systems. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
3
continuation... Technology choice has particularly been difficult for two recalcitrant and continuous threats: municipal waste, nutrient and hydrocarbon contamination. Incidentally, the former is a huge raw material for further economic growth while the later has presented itself as a true threat to human and environmental survival. This leaves us with one true class of enemy: nutrient and hydrocarbon contamination. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
4
Nutrient and Hydrocarbon Contamination. A number of approaches have successfully been deployed at industrial level with reckonable degree of achievement in controlling nutrient contamination and the most remarkable of them have been biological-technique enhanced treatments. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
5
continuation... However, the same cannot be said of bioremediation, especially in Nigeria. Considering the magnitude of threat from environmental degradation and the resultant socioeconomic dimension of hydrocarbon contamination in the Niger Delta area, the present administration has identified the security of the region as a national priority. This means all increased efforts at cleaning up the spills using sustainable technologies of which bioremediation is most suitable. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
6
continuation... Previous methods designed to deal with waste by-products from oil fields include: • • • •
storage landfill relocation incineration
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
7
Typical flare pit in the Niger Delta NABDA (c)2009
ENC
8
Hydrocarbon polluted farmlands in Ogoniland
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
9
1
Flow station at Ogbogu contaminated with hydrocarbon
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
10
BIOREMDIATION: INTRO • Decontamination of environmental media by naturally occurring biological agents in the environment is often slow. However, it goes on. • The implication is that at pollution levels below the carrying capacity of the media concerned, restoration to best known conditions for life support is possible over long time.
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
11
BIOREMDIATION • It is the optimization of this natural restoration power of biological agents that bioremediation seeks to optimize in the face of overwhelming contamination. • The technology seeks to catalyze natural decontamination process by stimulating the remedial activity of these organisms. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
12
BIOREMDIATION Our responsibility is thus to contribute to the success of stabilizing the Niger Delta through restoration of the environmental media to human usable forms. To achieve this task, various technologies must be identified and optimized for efficiency. At the moment, the most economic and sustainable technology is bioremediation. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
13
Bioremediation in Nigeria Bioremediation is a multidisciplinary technology that decomposes contaminants transforming them into harmless byproducts, i.e. water and carbon dioxide, using the following products: • • • •
microbes surfactants micronutrients and bio-stimulants NABDA (c)2009
ENC
14
Bioremediation in Nigeria Bioremediation • Economical • Sustainable Suitable for • cleaning up oil spills after emergency response • soils contaminated with petroleum/hydrocarbons derivatives • dangerous organic compounds.
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
15
continuation... Biostimulation involves – aeration – application of selected micronutrients and biostimulants.
Bio-stimulation is only effective when – indigenous microbial populations present in the substrate are high enough to degrade the contaminants – when these microbes can readily adapt to foreign contaminants.
Bioaugmentation involves – application of beneficial microbes that have an affinity towards a specific contaminant. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
16
Some contaminant suitable for bioremediation
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
17
Environmental conditions affecting bioremediation
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
18
1
2
All bioremediation methods could be ex-situ (1) (outside point of occurrence) or in-situ (2) (at the point of occurrence) NABDA (c)2009
ENC
19
continuation... Bioremediation Benefits -
Degradation in a relatively narrow time Simultaneous multiple activity Toxin resistant Reduced risk / higher degree of safety Reduced labor and equipment costs
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
20
continuation... Engineering
Bioremediation technology
Biology
Chemistry
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
21
Bioremediation process optimization – Without intervention, microbes degrade oil but at a rather slow rate. Enhancing this process is the essence of research in bioremediation. – Some of the process optimization strategies in bioremediation include the following: • Control of physical and chemical parameter example Temperature, pH, moisture and oxygen content. • Control of microbial parameters
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
22
Bioremediation process optimization parameters
Process optimization
Physico-chemical Factors •Temperature •pH •Water •O2 / Redox potential •Mass transfer •Solubility NABDA (c)2009
Microbial Parameters •Genetic characteristics •Physiological properties •Metabolic diversity •Enzymological capabilities ENC
23
Review of bioremediation efforts in Nigeria Unfortunately, very few successful efforts have been documented for field-scale bioremediation projects, but many lab-scale research work have been carried out. At lab-scale, the methods adopted include: • Simulation of field contamination • Bio-augmentation (indigenous and engineered microbes) • Bio-stimulation (agricultural fertiliser) • Tilling
Some of the results obtained are presented below: NABDA (c)2009
ENC
24
Review of bioremediation efforts in Nigeria S/N
Physico-Chemical Parameters
Range (%)
1.
Moisture Drop
19-13
2.
Organic Carbon Drop
85-1.5
3.
Ph Drop
6.34-4.5
4.
Nitrogen Increase
0.021-0.081
5.
Duration of bioremediation
8weeks
6.
Total Hydrocarbon Reduction (THP)
73-88
Range of values for results obtained from lab-scale bioremediation research NABDA (c)2009
ENC
25
Review of bioremediation efforts in Nigeria S/N
Method
(%) THC Reduction
1.
Biostimulation, Bioaugmentation with indigenous HUB Tilling
83
2.
mixing uncontaminated soil with polluted soil, tilling and Bioaugumentation with HUB
73
3.
Biostimulation, Bioaugmentation with indigenous HUB
88
4.
Biostimulation with tilling
86
5.
No intervention (control)
2
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
26
Pilot –scale bioremediation projects
Some measure of success has been achieved in large scale application of bioremediation. Very few attempts have been made though but the results have been particularly inspiring. One of such attempts is the development and pilot scale deployment of an indigenous bio-formulation for the cleaning of the following forms of hydrocarbon contamination:
Drilling mud Produced water Hydrocarbon contaminated sediment and soil Hydrocarbon contaminated water NABDA (c)2009
ENC
27
Current Practices of hydrocarbon waste management Drilling Mud and Produced Water On-shore: • dumped in temporary or permanent pits which eventually overflows into adjoining land and water.
Off-shore: • deposited into the surrounding waters where it also causes pollution. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
28
Untreated Drill Mud on soil
Drill mud is acidic and is dangerous to the environment if dumped without treatment NABDA (c)2009 ENC
29
Untreated Produced water
NABDA (c)2009 ENC 30 Scum and oil waste pollution on a flare pit in Niger Delta prior to treatment with an indigenous product
Untreated Produced water
Produced water does not support life due to high COD and BOD values from NABDA (c)2009 ENC 31 contamination
Current situation.... There is hardly any further remediation of sediments and water systems following emergency response to a reported spill. This situation results in: • Exertion of undue pressure on the attenuation potential of resident microbes • Death of resident microbes, flora and fauna due to acidity from contaminants • Loss in water and soil quality NABDA (c)2009
ENC
32
Indigenous products in bioremediation Research has been intense lately in Nigerian universities and research centres for the development of products capable of remedying hydrocarbon contamination. Some indigenous products have been able to handle the following operations: • • • •
Clean-up of oil polluted soil. Clean-up of oil on water. Conversion of oil sludge into organic fertilizer. Treatment of oil polluted soil samples from a flow station tank to a form that supports healthy plant growth. • Treatment of a produce wastewater pit Bio-treatment of samples of toxic drilling mud to a non-toxic form that supported healthy plant growth. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
33
Indigenous bioremediation products NABDA (c)2009
ENC
34
Bio-remediated Drill cuttings
• Drill Mud Cutting from oil site treated with indigenous bioremediation product can support the growth of plants. • The mud can also be reused for construction and other purposes NABDA (c)2009
ENC
35
Pilot Scale Treatment of a flare pit in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Using a locally formulated product
• Some of these products have undergone complete field trials under several standards including DPR, American, Canadian and Australian and have also been patented for full scale deployment. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
36
• Distinct plant and animal growth in treated produced water in a waste pit in Niger Delta
The results from treatment of waste pits using indigenous products
are quite encouraging. The implication is that the government will begin to enforce local content in personnel and product quota for the decontamination soil and water after emergency response. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
37
Results Drill cutting treatment with local product
Parameters
Untreated Drilling Mud mg/kg
Duration (days)
After 21 days
pH Cadmium (Cd) mg/ kg Cupper (Cu) mg/ kg Lead (Pb) mg/ kg Zinc (Zn) mg/ kg
9.10
7.00
6.5-8.5
6.5 - 8.5
1.37
0.26
0.8
12
6.8
1.4
36
190
3.24
0.88
85
530
39.96
140
720
78.22
0.09
Total TPH % • DPRa1 mg/kg - Target Value • DPRa2 mg/kg- Intervention Value
DPRa2 mg/kg
DPRa1 mg/kg
Treated mg/kg
51.76
NABDA (c)2009
Source: Otaiku, 2007 ENC
38
Results for some Waste Pit (Surface water) treatment using indigenous products DPRa1
Parameters pH
Untreated Waste Pit mg/kg
Australiab mg/kg
6.80 <0.01
29
55
Barium (Ba) mg/ kg
<0.01 410
300
200
625
Cadmium (Cd) mg/ kg
<0.01
2.87
0.8
12
1.5
Chromium (Cr) mg/ kg
3.0
0.31
100
380
80
Cupper (Cu) mg/ kg
4.0
1.94
36
190
65
Lead (Pb) mg/ kg
41.0
<0.01
85
530
50
Calcium (Ca) mg/ kg
1316
612.2 140
720
200
Arsenic (As) mg/kg
11.17 Zinc (Zn) mg/ kg
Canadac µg/kg
mg/kg
Treated mg/kg
6.56
DPRa2 mg/kg
20
52.0 NABDA (c)2009
ENC
39
Total Iron(Fe) mg/ kg
14.0
604.7
Sulphate (SO4²)mg/ kg
100
1 <0.01
Nitrate N03- mg/ kg Ammonia (NH4) mg/ kg
<0.01 8.0
26.0 18.7
Phosphate (P2O5) mg/ kg
2358 142
Salinity as Chloride (Cl) mg/ kg
TPH mg/ kg
PAH mg/ kg
80.0 17.65
50
5000
<0.01
1
40
4,600 4000µg/kg
0.311 21,000
19,500
3.12
<0.01
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/kg Sulphide (S2-),mg/kg
NABDA (c)2009
Source: Otaiku, 2007 ENC
40
Waste Pit (soil/sediment) treatment: indigenous product Parameters pH
Arsenic (As) mg/kg Barium (Ba) mg/ kg Cadmium (Cd) mg/ kg Chromium (Cr) mg/ kg Cupper (Cu) mg/ kg Lead (Pb) mg/ kg Calcium (Ca) mg/ kg
Untreated Waste Pit mg/kg
Treated waste pit mg/kg
6.56
DPRa2 mg/kg
Australiab mg/kg
Canadac µg/kg
mg/kg
6.80 <0.01
29
55
20
410
300
200
625
<0.01
2.87
0.8
12
1.5
3.0
0.31
100
380
80
4.0
1.94
36
190
65
41.0
<0.01
85
530
50
1316
612.2 140
720
200
<0.01
11.17 Zinc (Zn) mg/ kg
DPRa1
52.0 NABDA (c)2009
ENC
41
Total Iron(Fe) mg/ kg Sulphate (SO4²)mg/ kg
14.0
100.4
112.6
604.7
100
1920
300
1 <0.01
Nitrate N0 mg/ kg 3
Ammonia (NH4) mg/ kg
<0.01 8.0
243.0
13.8
16.3
28.0
2318
Phosphate (P2O5) mg/ kg
18.7 52.0
Salinity as Chloride (Cl) mg/ kg
2358
TPH mg/ kg
80.0
47.5
142 1,720
67.9
PAH mg/ kg
Sulphide (S2-),mg/kg
<0.01 0.311 21,000
17.65
50
5000
<0.01
1
40
0.50
4,600 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/kg
26.0
4000µg/ kg
0.02
N/A
19,500 60.0
3.12
N/A
<0.1
<0.01
Source: Otaiku, 2007 • DPRa1 mg/kg - Target Value • DPRa2 mg/kg- Intervention Value NABDA (c)2009
ENC
42
Way forward... In order to drive the necessary development in bioremediation technology, it is essential to have a supportive legislation. The results presented here are very few of the many efforts that have gone into both development of new and establishment of existing facts about the potency of bioremediation processes at TPH and PAH degradation. It is also important to support local development of products through incentives and patents for commercial production. A starting point is the development of a bioremediation programme for Nigeria, using established indigenous products. NABDA (c)2009
ENC
43
NABDA (c)2009
ENC
44