Novel Voltage Controller For Stand-alone Induction Generator Using Pwm Vsi

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Novel Voltage Controller For Stand-alone Induction Generator Using Pwm Vsi as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 3,453
  • Pages: 5
Novel Voltage Controller for Stand-alone Induction Generator using PWM-VSI G. V. Jayaramaiah

B. G. Fernandes

Research Scholar, Energy Systems Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai , Mumbai - 400 076 INDIA

Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai , Mumbai - 400 076 , INDIA Phone : +91 - 022 - 25767428, Email : [email protected]

Abstract— This paper presents a DSP-based constant voltage controller for stand alone wind energy conversion system using an induction generator. The system uses a pulse-width modulated voltage source inverter (PWM-VSI) with a start-up battery. The limitation of having stand alone wind energy conversion system with self-excited induction generator (SEIG) is poor voltage regulation which occurs with change in speed and load condition. To overcome this problem, a DSP-based voltage controller is developed. It regulates the voltage when SEIG is subjected to a sudden application/removal of load. It is now possible to operate the induction generator (IG) at constant voltage from no load to full load. The amplitude of the terminal voltage of the IG is regulated by varying the modulation index of the PWM inverter. The system has an inherent current limiting feature and it requires only sensing of dc link voltage. To predict the performance of the proposed system, a MATLAB/SIMULINKbased simulation study is carried out. The control algorithm is implemented on a TMS320F243 DSP platform at the assembly language level for optimum performance of the voltage controller. Viability of the compensation process is ascertained through experimental results obtained from the laboratory prototype.

I. I NTRODUCTION Among the different renewable energy systems, wind energy appears as the most promising one, due to both technical and economic factors. Important progress in wind energy conversion technologies has been achieved and more efficient and more powerful wind generators are now available. The selection of the generator depends upon many factors such as type of application, machine characteristics, maintenance, cost etc. Currently induction machines are more popular compared to other machines. However its major disadvantage is the requirement of excitation power. This reactive power can be supplied by a variety of methods [1]–[3], ranging from using simple capacitors to that of a VSI inverter with complex power conversion techniques. Another limitation of the SEIG in stand-alone systems is its inability to control the terminal voltage and frequency under change in load and wind speed. To overcome this problem, several methods are proposed in [2]–[4]. The capacitor excitation [3], [4] is suitable only when there is a constant load at the IG terminal and is driven at constant mechanical speed. However any change in load and rotor speed may result in a loss of excitation. To overcome this problem, discrete blocks of capacitors can be

added or removed at the IG terminals either using contactors or power electronic switches in series with the capacitors, depending upon change in speed and load. Another method of providing excitation involves using a saturable reactor [5] connected in each phase of IG. This inductor with stepped air gap gradually saturates with stator current. As a result, its inductance decreases with load. However the overall system is bulky and expensive. In order to improve the performance of the system, use of modern control techniques such as vector control and sliding mode control have been suggested [6 & 7]. Though the use of vector control technique improves the performance of the system, the overall system becomes complex. It should be noted that one of the key issues in standalone system is reliability and simplicity in control structure. The use of these techniques defeats this purpose. The excitation schemes proposed in [6]–[10] involve power electronic converters to source the required reactive power to excite the IG. Though the voltage build-up process has been discussed and the results have been presented in these papers, the dynamic behaviour of SEIG is not discussed. Moreover, the overall control structure is complex in nature. Therefore the main objective of this paper is to develop a simple control strategy to overcome the limitations of the existing schemes. The proposed controller is also capable of handling reactive loads and does not require the mechanical speed sensors, ac voltage or current sensors, thereby reducing the overall cost and hardware complexity. This also improves the overall reliability of the system. The controller maintains a constant voltage at the IG terminal during the change in load by adjusting the inverter frequency. The amplitude of the terminal voltage of IG is controlled by the modulation index of the VSI. Unlike in most of the systems reported in literature, the proposed system does not require a dump load. Detailed Matlab/Simulink-based simulation studies are carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the scheme. Viability of the scheme is confirmed through experimental results using a scaled down laboratory prototype. The control algorithm is implemented on a TMS320F243 DSP.

204 1-4244-0365-0/06/$20.00 (c) 2006 IEEE

II. M ATHEMATICAL M ODELLING OF 3-Φ S ELF - EXCITED I NDUCTION G ENERATOR The d-q axes equivalent circuits of an induction generator (IG) in synchronously rotating reference frame are shown in Fig. 1. The complete dynamic equations of IG, taking Rs

ω eλqs

Lls

Llr

(ω e− ω r)λ qr

− +

I ds

+ −

λds

Vds

Vdr

Rs

I qs

Lls

Llr

Using the switching function SF 1a,b,c the Vao , Vbo and Vco can be obtained as: ∞ Vdc Vdc  SF1a = An sin(nωt) Vao = 2 2 n=1

(ω e − ω r)λ dr R r

+ −

+ −

λqs

Vqs

=

∞ Vdc Vdc  SF1b = An sin(nωt − 120o ) 2 2 n=1

Vco

=

∞ Vdc Vdc  SF1c = An sin(nωt + 120o ) 2 2 n=1

Vqr

(b) Fig. 1.

Vbo

I qr

λqr

Lm

= Sa iea + Sb ieb + Sc iec

B. Model of the Voltage Source Inverter (VSI)

(a) ω eλds

Idc

(suffix e identifies compensator phase currents) The three switching functions take the value of 1 if the upper switch of the inverter leg is on and it is 0 if the lower switch in the same inverter leg is on.

Rr I dr

λdr

Lm

The set point of Vdc must be greater than the peak value of the machine line voltage in order to force the desired line currents. Total d. c. current Idc can be expressed in terms of inverter switching function as

The Line-to-Line voltages generated by the inverter can be derived as:

d-q model of IG (a) d - axis (b) q - axis

saturation into account, in synchronously rotating reference frame [11], [12] is represented in matrix form as follows :          d λds V i 0 −1 λds = ds − Rs ds − ω Vqs iqs 1 0 λqs dt λqs        d λdr 0 Vdr ids = − Rr − (ω − ωr ) 1 λ V i dt qr qr qs

d ωr dt

= =

= Vao − Vbo

Vbc

= Vbo − Vco

Vca

= Vco − Vao

C. Mathematical model of the Load

  −1 λdr 0 λqr

Equations dealing with generator feeding a (R-L) load in d-q frame are

Equations for electromagnetic torque and mechanical speed of the SEIG are expressed as follows: Te

Vab

3P (iqr λdr − λqr idr ) 4 P ∗ (Tshaf t − Te ) 2J

Vds

= RL iLds + LL

Vqs

= RL iLqs + LL

where iLds and iLqs of the load current

d iLds − ωe LL iLqs dt

d iLqs + ωe LL iLqs dt are the d-axis and q-axis components

IV. P RINCIPLE OF OPERATION OF THE CIRCUIT III. M ATHEMATICAL M ODELING OF 3 − Φ PWM - VSI The complete mathematical modeling of the PWM-VSI and the load are explained in the following sections. A. Representation of the d. c. side of the inverter The capacitor voltage equation is governed by: d Idc Vdc = − dt C where Vdc is the voltage across the capacitor and Idc is the current flowing through it, as shown in Fig. 2.

The proposed overall system block diagram is shown in Fig. 2. A 12 V battery on the dc side of inverter is provided for initial excitation. The reactive power required by the IG and load is provided by the voltage source inverter. Therefore the rating this inverter is chosen based on the excitation power of IG and reactive power requirements of the load. During startup, the controller sets the stator frequency lower than the rotor frequency so that the power produced by IG is used to charge the capacitor connected across the dc link to a set reference value. In this study this voltage is maintained at 150 V. The error between the reference and actual capacitor

205

PM−Prime mover IG − Induction Generator

S3

1 0 0 1

11 00 00 11

S5

Diode

1 0 0 1

1 0 0 1

R PM

Charging circuit

Idc S1

C

Y

IG

Vs

Vdc

12 V

B S4

R Y

S6

1 0 0 1

11 00 00 11

S2

1 0 0 1

B Control Signals R

Y R

B S1

S4

S3

S6

S5

Vdc

S2

PI

L N Load

*

Vdc

V 1 0

ωmax

Vtri

ma Vryb

ryb

Sin

dq Cos

1 kHz

Fig. 2.

ωmin

OSC

ωs

DSP TMS320F243 Block diagram of the Proposed System

voltages is processed by the PI controller. If the measured capacitor voltage is higher than the reference value, the stator frequency is increased by the controller, thereby decreasing the torque and power supplied by IG, and, if the measured capacitor voltage is lower than the reference value the stator frequency is decreased. The output of the PI regulator is fed to the harmonic oscillator to generate the sine and cosine waveforms. These waveforms are multiplied by the modulation index (ma ) to get Vr , Vy and Vb as shown in Fig. 2. These sinusoidal waveforms are compared with 1 kHz triangular carrier signal to generate the switching pulses to the IGBT inverter. Any variation in the output power of IG is directly indicated by the variation in the terminal voltage of the generator. A decrease in capacitor voltage below the reference value indicates that the active power drawn by the load is higher than the power generated by IG. This difference in power is supplied by the VSI and hence the dc link voltage falls. Due to step change in load, the input power to the induction generator decreases as speed of the prime mover decreases. To maintain a constant voltage at the IG terminal, the controller decreases the inverter frequency. An increase in capacitor voltage indicates that the active power required by the load is reduced due to the removal of

load. Under this condition active power generated by the IG is higher than the power required by the load. In order to decrease the active power the controller increases the inverter frequency. V. S IMULATION R ESULTS The developed models of the sub-system are integrated and the resulting system is simulated using MATLAB/SIMULINK. The machine rating and its equivalent circuit parameters used for the study are given in appendix. In order to prove the viability of the control scheme a TMS320F243 DSP based scaled down laboratory prototype is designed and developed. The simulated results showing the variation of terminal voltage of the generator and the voltage across dc link capacitor during start up are shown in Fig. 3 while, Fig. 4 shows these results obtained from the prototype developed in the laboratory. When the IG is suddenly loaded the frequency and terminal voltage of IG, and the capacitor voltage tend to fall. The terminal voltage is restored to the reference value by adjusting the inverter frequency. The simulated and experimental results are shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 respectively. Similar behaviour of SEIG is observed when

206

(V)

100

RY

V

ry

IG Voltage V (V)

100 (a)

−100 0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.55

1.6

1.65

1.7

1.75

1.8

(b)

Phase−A

IG

1.45

1.5

1.55

1.6

1.65

1.7

1.75

1.8

4 2 0 −2 −4

(c)

1.4

(b)

1.45

1.5

1.55

1.6

1.65

1.7

1.75

1.8

Time (Sec)

V

dc

(V)

1.5

150

1.4

150 100

1.45

160

140

1.4 (A)

0.2

(a)

−200

Vdc (V)

0

0 −100

50

Trace a Trace b Trace c

0 0.2

0.4

Trace a Trace b

: :

Fig. 3.

0.6

0.8 Time (Sec)

1

1.2

1.4

Fig. 5.

Line-to-line voltage of IG Capacitor voltage Vdc

: : :

Line-to-line voltage of IG Capacitor voltage Vdc phase current of IG

Simulated results of SEIG during step increase in load

Simulated results of SEIG on no-load

Trace a Trace b Trace c Time Fig. 6.

: : : :

Line-to-line voltage of IG 200V/div Capacitor voltage Vdc 100V/div Load current 1A/div x-axis 200ms/div

Experimental results of SEIG during step increase in load

are shown in Fig. 9. Trace 1 Trace 2 Time Fig. 4.

: : :

Line-to-line voltage of IG 200V/div Capacitor voltage 50V/div x-axis 250ms/div

VI. C ONCLUSION

Experimental results of DSP controlled SEIG on no-load

the load on IG is reduced. The terminal voltage and stator frequency tend to increase. The terminal voltage and capacitor voltage increase due to the mismatch in active power produced by the IG, which is more than the power consumed by the load. The closed loop controller adjusts the inverter frequency so that the the terminal voltage is maintained at the reference value. The simulated and experimental results are shown in the Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 respectively. The variation of the stator frequency and capacitor voltage during step change in load

A simple DSP based constant voltage controller for stand alone wind energy conversion system using induction generator is proposed. The controller is able to maintain a constant voltage at the terminals of IG during step change in load. The developed controller has a fast dynamic response, robust and reliable. The controller does not require any mechanical speed sensor thereby reducing the cost and complexity of the hardware. The control algorithm is implemented on TMS320F243 EVM DSP platform using assembly level language and simulated using MATLAB/SIMULINK. Viability of the compensation process is ascertained through experimental results obtained from the laboratory prototype.

207

Vdc (V)

155

100 0

ry

V (V)

200

(a)

−100 −200 3.4

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.8

3.9

150 145 135 1.4

4

(a)

140 1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

2

55

fs (Hz)

165

V (V)

155

dc

(b) 145

45 1.4 160

135 3.4

3.6

3.7

3.8

3.9

L

(b) 1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

2

4

Vdc(V)

3.5

0.5

I (A)

50

(c)

0

155

(c) 150 145 3.4

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.8

3.9

4

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.8

3.9

fs(Hz)

50 −0.5 3.4

4

Time(Sec)

Trace a Trace b Trace c Fig. 7.

: : :

(d) 45 40 3.4

Line-to-line voltage of IG Vry Capacitor voltage Vdc Load current

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.8

3.9

4

Time (Sec)

Trace a and c Trace b and d

: :

Capacitor voltage Vdc Stator frequency fs

Simulated results of SEIG during step decrease in load Fig. 9.

Simulated results of SEIG during step change in load.

R EFERENCES

Trace a Trace b Trace c Time Fig. 8.

: : : :

Line-to-line voltage of IG 200V/div Capacitor voltage Vdc 100V/div Load current 1A/div x-axis 200ms/div

Experimental results of SEIG during step decrease in load

VII. A PPENDIX Parameters of the Induction Machine at 50 Hz Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Φ Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ∆ Rated voltage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 V Rated current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.425 A Speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1430 RPM Stator resistance(rs ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.83 (Ω) Rotor resistance(rr ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.55 (Ω) Stator inductance(ls ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.4535 (H) Rotor inductance (lr ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.475 (H) Magnetizing inductance(unsaturated) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.3H Rated power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1kW Number of Poles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Rotor inertia(J) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.664 (kg.m2 )

[1] E.D.Basset and F.M.Potter, “Capacitance excitation of Induction Generators,” Transaction on American Institute of Electrical Engineering, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 540–545, 1935. [2] H. C. Rai and A. K. Tandon, “Voltage Regulation of SEIG Using Passive Elements,” 6th European Conference on Electrical Machines and Drives, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 240–245, 1983. [3] M.B.Brennan and A.Abbondanti, “Static Excitation for Induction Generator,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 422–428, Sept/Oct, 1977. [4] N. H. Malik and A. H. Al-Bahrani, “Influence of the Terminal Capacitor on the Performance Characteristics of SEIG,” IEE Proceedings of Instituteion of Electrical Engineering,Part C, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 168– 173, March, 1990. [5] S. M. Alghuwainew, “Steady State Analysis of a Self-Excited Induction Generator by Shunt Saturable Reactor,” IEEE Conference on Electrical Machines and Drives, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 101–103, 1997. [6] D. W. Novotny and G. H. Studtmann, “Self-excitation in Inverter Driven Induction machine,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1117–1125, July/Aug, 1977. [7] S. N. Bhadra, K. V. Ratnam, and A. Manjunath, “Study of Voltage Build up in a Self-Excited, Variable Speed Induction Generator/Static Inverter System With D.C side Capacitor,” IEEE Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy System, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 964–970, 1996. [8] T.L.Maguire and A.M.Gole, “Apparatus for supplying an isolated dc load from a variable speed Self-Excited Induction Generator,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 468–475, 1993. [9] G. V. Jayaramaiah and B. G. Fernandes, “Dynamic Simulation of Three Phase Self-Excited Induction Generator With PWM-VSI,” National Conference on Control,Communication and Informations Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 132–137,Jan,GOA, 2004. [10] M.S.Miranda, R.O.Lyra, and S.R.Silva, “An Alternative Isolated wind electric pumping system using Induction machine,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1611–1616, Dec, 1999. [11] P.C.Krause, O.Wasynczuk, and S. Sudhoff, Analysis of Electrical Machinery. New York: IEEE Press, 1994. [12] O. Ojo, “Minimum Airgap Flux linkage Requirement for Self-Excitation in Stand Alone Induction Generators,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 484–492, 1995.

208

Related Documents