1Q09
COMPANY INITIAL PRESENTATION
Version 2.0
1Q09
BRAZIL AND SHOPPING CENTER MARKET MULTIPLAN PRESENTATION
OUR PORTFOLIO GROWTH STRATEGY MODELING FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
2
1Q09
Highlights: Brazil, Retail and SC’s Purchase Power Classes A/B
Class C
11%
12%
12%
13%
14%
15%
42%
44%
46%
48%
50%
52%
Lack of Shopping Centers Total GLA (m²) / 1,000 habitants
Credit Increase
Source: IPDM (2008)
47%
1,800
Classes D/E
44%
42%
38%
GLA/'000 Habitants
400. 0Bi
36%
32%
Consumer Credit (R$) Interest Rate 17.7%
300. 0Bi
1,262
250. 0Bi
16.3%
200. 0Bi
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
150. 0Bi
Source: CPS/FGV based on data from PME/IBGE
100. 0Bi
88.0 Bi
113.0 Bi
22. 0%
334.4 Bi
18.5%
350. 0Bi
155.0 Bi
20. 0%
192.0 Bi
235.0 Bi
18. 0%
16. 0%
13.2%
11.2%
13.7%
14. 0%
12. 0%
231
USA
Canada
50. 0Bi
105
France
45
Mexico
0. 0Bi
Sales Evolution
Brazil
27.9%
Inflation Under Control
13.3%
15.8%
7.9% 5.7%
7.7%
2003
7.6%
2004
Source: IBGE/FGV
1.2% 2005
9.1%
2006
-3.7% 2003
2004 Retail
3.1% 3.8%
9.3% 4.8%
12.1% 9.3%
13.1%
9.2%
IPCA - Consumer Price Index IGP-DI - General Price Index
4.5% 2007
5.9%
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Source: BACEN
19.3% 13.8%
10. 0%
2003
2005
15.1%
16.0%
10.0% 9.6% 6.2%
2006
18.7%
2007
11.0% 9.1%
2008
Shopping Centers Multiplan Source: IBGE and ABRASCE
Retail Sales * – SC share in the market Canada
65.5%
USA
51.3%
Mexico
50.0%
France
28.0%
Brazil
18.3%
Source: ICSC of 2006 and 2007; ABRASCE of 2008 *Does not consider fuel and lubrificants; Construction material, tools, etc...; GLP.
3
1Q09
Shopping Centers in Brazil North
2.5% of the GLA
Shopping Centers: 9 GLA: 219,220 m² Population: 14.6 million GDP per Capita: R$ 8.2 thousand GLA/1,000 habitants: 15
Total GLA: 8.7 million m²
Northeast
13.6% of the GLA
Shopping Centers: 51 GLA: 1,178,187 m² Population: 51.5 million GDP per Capita: R$ 6.0 thousand GLA/1,000 habitants: 23
Midwest
Federal District
Shopping Centers: 22 GLA: 462,316 m² Population: 13.2 million GDP per Capita: R$15.6 thousand GLA/1,000 habitants: 35
Shopping Centers: 12 GLA: 253,937 m² Population: 2.5 million GDP per Capita: R$ 36.5 thousand GLA/1,000 habitants: 102
Southeast
152
15.2% of the GLA
Shopping Centers: 74 GLA: 1,314,367 m² Population: 26.7 million GDP per Capita: R$ 14.5 thousand GLA/1,000 habitants: 49
Around 325 per month
million visitors
2.9% of the GLA
5.3% of the GLA
South
377 shopping centers under operation, from which 194 are located in the 20 largest cities
60.4% of the GLA
5,412
Cities with Shopping Center
Shopping Centers: 209 GLA: 5,219,638 m² Population: 77.8 million GDP per Capita: R$ 17.3 thousand GLA/1,000 habitants: 67
5 largest companies hold 20% of total own GLA GLA/1,000 habitants São Paulo
159
Belo Horizonte 112
Rio de Janeiro
147
Curitiba
159
Porto Alegre
208
Brasília
99
Source: Abrasce (2009), IBGE (2008)
Cities without Shopping Center
Fonte: Abrasce (2008) and IBGE (2007)
4
1Q09
Advantages of the Sector High operational margins (NOI > 80%) Entertainment Area in BarraShoppingSul
Results leveraged by retail growth
Synergy with the real estate sector (mixed-use projects)
Gourmet Area in BarraShopping
Leasing contracts indexed to the inflation index (IGP-DI)
Cash flow’s predictability (standard 5-year contract)
Shopping center as a urban chaos solution
Medical Center in BarraShopping
5
1Q09
USA and Brazil Shopping Center Sectors
USA
Brazil
. Consolidated market
. Lack of shopping centers
. Low revenue increase
. High revenue growth, indexed to the inflation
. Reit structure . Real Estate driven . Large tenants with high bargain power . Payment of TI (Tenants induction) . Dividend play
X
. Company structure . Real Estate & retail driven . Small tenants with low bargain power . Key money Revenue . Growth play
6
1Q09
BRAZIL AND SHOPPING CENTER MARKET MULTIPLAN PRESENTATION
OUR PORTFOLIO GROWTH STRATEGY MODELING FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
7
1Q09 Reference to the Sector since 1975
554,290 m²
*
484,374 m²
Multiplan’s Historical Total GLA Growth
345,180 m²
289,946 m²
177,195 m² 18,974 m²
140,034 m²
Growing 26x with CAGR of 12% in almost 30 years, Developing 10 shopping centers and 36 expansions 1984
1989
1994
1999
2004
2009
Partners
Aquisições
Developments
1979
115,160 m²
* Considering the projects under construction in 2009
5
1Q09
Ownership Structure 147,799,441 Stocks Free Float * 25.01%
MTP & Peres 40.53%
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan 34.70%
Partnership with Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP)
Common Stocks 26.67% *
Preferred Stocks 8.02%
The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan is the pension fund of 284 thousand Canadian teachers, with assets valued at U$87.4 billion (on December 31, 2008). In 1999, OTPP acquired Cadillac Fairview, that became Multiplan’s partner in June 2006.
* 0.2% of the total stocks are in Treasury
Cadillac Fairview: Integrated Part of the OTPP
One of the largest mall developers, managers and owners in North America, with a portfolio valued more than USD$ 16 million and a GLA of approximately 15 million m², Cadillac Fairview holds stake in ventures located in Canada, USA, England and Brazil, through a partnership with Multiplan. Source: Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan and Cadillac Fairview
Champlain Place
Toronto Eaton Centre
Richmond Centre
9
1Q09
Multiplan Effect BH Shopping (MG)
RibeirãoShopping (SP)
1997
1984
2007
BHS
1999
2007
2006
1997
GLA 18,974 m² Interest 32.5% Nº of Stores 130
2008 36,895 m² 80.0% 295
1984 RBS GLA 17,268 m² Interest 20.0% Nº of Stores 110
ShoppingAnáliaFranco (SP)
2008 46,221 m² 76.2% 232
SAF
1999
GLA 39,636 m² Interest 30.0% Nº of Stores 236
2008 39,310 m² 30.0% 236
10
1Q09
Cycle of High Returns of our Leading Shoppings High Returns Same Store Rent (R$/m²) + 10.6%
1,034
935
Higher Sales
More Investments
Same Store Sales (R$/m²) + 10.3%
Increase in GLA ( ’000 m²)
13,030
+ 88.9% 11,810
Tenant 2007
Multiplan Ranking for Multiplan Stores / Tenant Total Stores (1)
2007
# Ranking 1Multiplan7for/ 60 Multiplan Stores /
Tenant
295 m²
2008
Original GLA
2008
Best Tenants
Tenant
#1
#1
4/4
#1
#1
#1 #1
Total Stores (1)
557 m²
Future GLA*
* After expansions
Higher Atraction Power
7 / 60 4/4
6 / 11
6 / 11 6 / 84
11
1Q09 98,0%
Control, Management & Innovation 97,9%
Majority interest in the shopping malls represents a key competitive advantage to achieve long-term performance in the industry
Average Interest & Control in Malls
68%
Rationale Strategic Control of the Malls
83%
100%
Strategic Approach Ability to change tenant mix and a higher capacity to negotiate with retailers
Ability to Expand and Adapt to Market Trends
Full control over the refurbishment and expansions in terms of timing, size and tenant mix
Control over the Malls
Majority interest allows MTE to implement its state-of-the-art management tools and techniques
Average Interest Average interest 1Q09
Mallswith with 50% Malls 50%oror moreof of interest interest more
Control over Control over management management
Award - Best Shopping
Fashion Week, a success
Medical Center integrated
Mall of São Paulo
created by Multiplan
to a shopping
Source: Companies’ Reports
12
1Q09
Who We Are Quality Shopping Centers
Leadership in the Sector
Rent Revenue/m² - 2008 (R$/m²) 1,139
+46%
(R$ millions) – 2008
453
+25%
Multiplan
Iguatemi
351
912
780
BRMalls 214
241 147
209 121
77
-30 BRMalls
Multiplan
Iguatemi
Low Risk
Interest, Management and Control
BRMalls
Multiplan
Gross Revenue
Adjusted FFO
Adjusted Net Income
High Returns
Average 3rd year NOI Yield > 15%
Iguatemi 83%
68%
44%
56%
Average. Interest 1 2008 Source: Companies’ report
35%
50%
Malls with 50% or 2 more of interest 2008
ParkShopping – Frontal Expansion
BarraShoppingSul – New Shopping Center
MorumbiShopping – Mixed-use
Shopping Santa Úrsula – Acquisition
13
1Q09
BRAZIL AND SHOPPING CENTER MARKET MULTIPLAN PRESENTATION
OUR PORTFOLIO GROWTH STRATEGY MODELING FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
14
1Q09
Shopping Centers Multiplan 5
1
10
14
Numbers confirm leadership in every city State
Multiplan %
1 BH Shopping
MG
80.0%
36,895 m²
R$770.4 M
99.1%
1º
2 RibeirãoShopping
SP
76.2%
46,221 m²
R$523.3 M
96.8%
1º
3 BarraShopping
RJ
51.1%
69,503 m²
R$1,083.7 M
98.0%
1º
4 MorumbiShopping
SP
65.8%
54,988 m²
R$1,145.6 M
99.6%
1º
5 ParkShopping
DF
59.1%
43,178 m²
R$429.6 M
96.9%
1º
6 DiamondMall
MG
90.0%
21,360 m²
R$301.5 M
99.1%
5º
7 New York City Center
RJ
50.0%
22,068 m²
R$85.0 M
97.5%
1º
8 ShoppingAnáliaFranco
SP
30.0%
39,310 m²
R$320.7 M
98.6%
7º
PR
84.0%
42,968 m²
R$677.0 M
99.1%
1º
MG
83.8%
16,172 m²
R$ 221.3 M
98.8%
2º
Shopping
Total GLA
Asset Value ¹ (% MTE)
Occupancy Top of 1Q09 Mind ²
In Operation AL 2
6
DF
MG
11
7 SP
9 ParkShoppingBarigüi
11
10 Pátio Savassi
PR 9
3
8
11 Shopping Santa Úrsula
SP
37.5%
24,043 m²
R$56.3 M
69.8%
N/A
12 BarraShoppingSul
RS
100.0%
68,187 m²
R$ 573.0 M
93.9%
N/A
96.3%
-
Sub-Total In Operation
RS
68.2%
Under development 13 Shopping Vila Olímpia 14 Shopping Maceió 12
8
Already Operating
13
4
Under Development/Approval
Portfolio Total
3
484,894 m² R$ 6,187.3 M
(% constr.) SP AL
42.0%
29,538 m²
50.0%
27,582 m²
65.8%
542,062 m²
¹ According to Jones Lang LaSalle evaluation done in November 2008, considering present and future expansions ² Researches from Veja SP, IPDM, DataFolha and Tribuna & Recall between 2005 and 2008 in each city. New York City Center is considered as part of BarraShopping ³ Interest during construction 15
1Q09
Historical Performance Summary Sales Compound Growth (CAGR) 25.0%
18.0%
SC Sales (2000-2008) Retail Sales (2001-2008)
20.0%
16.8%
15.7% 15.0%
Rent Compound Growth (CAGR)
11.8%
11.1%
21.1%
12.6%
14.0%
18.3%
17.9%
16.0%
13.7%
11.2%
6.8%
4.0% 2.0% 0.0%
Brazilian Indexes vs. Multiplan Portfolio
NOI Compound Growth (CAGR) SC NOI (2000-2008) GDP (2000-2008)
16.0%
14.4% 14.1%
14.0% 10.4% 10.3%
(CAGR)(2000-2008)
18.8% 18.3% 14.9%
15.8% 13.6%
14.7%
14.5%
11.9%
10.0% 8.0%
16.0% 16.3%
6.0%
0.0%
12.0%
10.2% 9.9%
8.0%
5.0%
18.0%
12.0% 10.0%
11.9%
10.0%
20.0%
SC Rent (2000-2008) IPCA (2001-2008) 13.9% 13.1% 12.5%
16.0%
6.2%
6.3%
6.0% 4.0%
4.1%
2.9%
2.0% 0.0%
GDP
IPCA
Brazil *PKB was opened in 2003, and for this calculation the 2004-2008 figures were considered
Retail Sales
Sales
Rent
NOI
Portfolio 16
1Q09
Expansions and Revitalizations Reinvesting in the Portfolio
Occupancy Rate Year Average 100%
Before Renovation
99.4%
ParkShopping Barigüi
98% 96% 94%
98.2%*
After Renovation
MorumbiShopping
96.6% 94.5%
Shopping AnáliaFranco
92%
BarraShoppingSul and Shopping Santa Úrsula 90.7%
90%
ParkShopping *Disregarding BarraShoppingSul and Shopping Santa Úrsula
Investing in Our Enterprises 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sc’s in Operation BH Shopping RibeirãoShopping BarraShopping MorumbiShopping ParkShopping DiamondMall New York City Center ShoppingAnáliaFranco ParkShoppingBarigüi Pátio Savassi² Shopping Santa Úrsula³ BarraShoppingSul4
¹ Including expansions under construction ² Acquired in April 2008 ³ Acquired in June 2007 4 Opened in November 2008
State MG SP RJ SP DF MG RJ SP PR MG SP RS
Age 29 28 27 27 25 12 9 9 5 1 1 -
Expansions¹ 5 5 6 5 9 3 1 2 -
DiamondMall
Total of 36
17
1Q09
BRAZIL AND SHOPPING CENTER MARKET MULTIPLAN PRESENTATION
OUR PORTFOLIO GROWTH STRATEGY MODELING FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
18
1Q09
Potential Growth New Shopping Centers
Opportunity to improve mix
Expansions
(Lack of SC’s – GLA/’000 Hab.)
(High occupancy rate - %GLA MTE)
98.2%
Source: IPDM (2008)
97.4%
1,800
GLA/'000 Habitants
95.4%
Canada
France
105
Mexico
45
Cost reduction through scale
2003 2004 2005 2006 * Adjusted excluding BSS and SSU.
Brazil
Third Party Acquisitions (Fragmented market - % Own GLA)
Return (IRR)
New clients and tenants
Savoy
5.2% 4.0%
2008*
Minority Acquisitions
(Shares to be acquired - % MTE GLA) PREVI 10.7%
Expansions
Future potential for expansions
5.5%
2007
Growth Strategies
Synergies with real estate projects
75.8%
Increases competitiveness
95.1%
94.2%
231
USA
Growth of consumers flow
96.1%
1,262
Higher attraction power
BRMalls Multiplan Sonae Iguatemi
2.6% Aliansce 2.6% Brascan/Malzoni 2.1% 2.3% Others Source: ABRASCE, BNDES and companies (2008)
19%
16%
Mixed-Use Projects New SC’s
Minority Acquisitions
MTE 68.2%
A.FRANCO 5.7%
FAPES 2.6% USIMINAS 2.0% Others 8.5%
Third Party SC’s
SISTEL 2.4%
13% Low
Medium
Risk
Quick way to grow Access to new markets Consolidation and scale Possible synergy with portfolio
High
No new G&A cost to the company Higher control of mix change, expansions and revitalizations Low risk Faster decision process 19
1Q09
Investment Strategy Development Pipeline
Shopping Centers/Expansions
( ’000 m²)
Own GLA +10.2%
9 m²
331 m²
Shoppings in operation
364 m²
25 m²
Shoppings under Expansions under development development
Total
5 expansions under development
+ 39,810 m²
4 expansions approved
+ 33,158 m²
1 mall under construction
+ 29,586 m²
1 mall under development
+ 27,582 m²
… Not considering lands for mixed-use projects
100% Project
Projects’ Economic Capex *
Stores to be opened
As of April 2009 - (R$ ‘000)
Capex to be invested
2009
2010
113,387
-
Renovations
30,748
2,285
Projects to be started
47,437
33,509
Expansions under construction
124,137
6,373
Shoppings under construction
58,976
2,271
374,685
44,437
Lands
Total
971,245 m²
*Capex updated in May 2009, based on the budget review for the construction to be started in 2009.
+19.8%
3,614
3,016
Stores to be leased 16%
Stores leased 84%
Stores in 1Q09
Stores in 2010 20
1Q09
Shoppings Under Development Shopping Under Construction – Shopping Vila Olímpia (SP) Located in the heart of Vila Olímpia, a neighborhood that has become synonymous of modernity and entrepreneurship in the City of São Paulo, Shopping Vila Olímpia promises to transform the region even further. The architectural project is inspired on the aesthetics of the factories that occupied the region in the early 20th century.
Project Details
Total stores: 221
NOI 1st year
R$ 9.2 M
Anchor stores: 5
NOI 3rd year
R$ 10.9 M
(MTE %)
Launch
Jul/07
Opening
Nov/09
Interest *
42.0%
GLA (m²)
29,586 m²
Key Money
R$ 21.6 M
CAPEX
R$ 89.9 M
* During construction, MTE interest is 42%. Due to a ground lease, MTE interest will be 30% after opening.
Shopping Under Approval – Shopping Maceió (AL) In association with Aliansce Shopping
Centers S.A., Multiplan is planning a new greenfield project, Shopping Maceió. The mall will be built on a 200,000 m² land in the city’s fastestgrowing region. As a result, it will be a mixed-use project, involving residential and commercial buildings as well as a hotel complex. Total stores: 207 Anchor stores: 7
Project Details
(MTE %)
Launch
TBA**
Opening
TBA**
Interest
50.0%
GLA (m²) Key Money CAPEX
27,582 m² R$ 8.2 M R$ 67.3 M
NOI 1st year
R$ 8.3 M
NOI 3rd year
R$ 10.9 M
** To be announced
21
1Q09
Expansions Expansions Under Construction Project
Expansions Approved
GLA
MTE %
Open.
Project
11,667 m²
30.0%
Jul/09
466 m²
76.2%
ParkShopping Exp. Frontal
8,591 m²
BH Shopping Expansion
GLA
MTE %
BarraShopping Exp. VII
4,894 m²
51.1%
2011
Aug/09
DiamondMall Exp. II
5,299 m²
100.0%
2011
62.5%
Oct/09
ParkShopping Exp. Gourmet
1,327 m²
60.0%
2011
11,010 m²
80.0%
Apr/10
BarraShoppingSul Exp. I
21,638 m²
100.0%
2014
ParkShoppingBarigüi Exp. II
8,075 m²
100.0%
Oct/10
Total
33,158 m²
91.2%
Total
39,810 m²
65.6%
30,232 m²
9.2%
26,107 m²
5.4%
ShoppingAnáliaFranco Expansion RibeirãoShopping Expansion
Total Own GLA
Total Own GLA
Own GLA (’000)
+ 16.9%
SAF Expansion
30 m²
386 m²
Expansions approved
Total
RBS Expansion
BHS Expansion
Open.
PKS Expansions
26 m²
330 m²
Shoppings in operation
Expansions under construction
22
1Q09
Acquisition of Third Party Malls Consolidation in Belo Horizonte (MG)
GLA Share Administration Vacancy Sales / m² *
Pátio Savassi
BH Shopping
DiamondMall
16,172 m²
36,895 m²
20,809 m²
83.8%
80.0%
90.0%
Multiplan
Multiplan
Multiplan
0.9%
2.8%
2.6%
R$ 13,655
R$ 15,865
R$ 14,134
127
295
228
9.4 million
14.7 million
9.0 million
Nº Stores Customers Flow
1 Diamond Mall 1 1
22 Pátio Savassi
5.3 km 2.503 R$/m²
Shopping Santa Úrsula GLA Share Administration Vacancy Sales / m² * Nº Stores Customers Flow 1
Based on 2008 figures
2
From May to December
2
4.3 km
Regional consolidation Reduce the competition Higher bargain power
33
Consolidation in Ribeirão Preto (SP)
1.7 km
BH Shopping
Operational synergy
1
Consumer segmentation
Ribeirão Shopping
24,043 m²
46,221 m²
37.5%
76.2%
Multiplan
Multiplan
27.5%
2.6%
R$ 4,276
R$ 8,503
114
232
2.4 million
15.2 million
* Sales 2008 / (Total GLA – Vacancy)
2
Improve the marketing effort
3.5km (8 mins.)
Entrance barrier 1
23
1Q09
Mixed-Used Strategy Analysis Centro Empresarial BarraShopping 1
Growth of people flow in the region
BarraShopping GLA
Private Area
R$ 1.02 billion
People Flow
27 million
59,617 m²
Price / m²
R$ 6,500
People Flow
69,501 m²
Sales (2008)
2
3.6 million
Need of living close to work location
3
Royal Green Peninsula Private Area
24,287 m²
PSV
> R$ 70 million
3
Growth of the number of consumers in the region and the demand for new expansions
Development of new commercial projects
4
1
2
5
5
4
Barra da Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro
Land Acquired Area
36,748 m²
Price
R$ 100 million
Appreciation of the area and new opportunities for investments
New York City Center GLA
22,068 m²
Sales (2008)
R$ 141 million
People Flow
8 million
24
1Q09
Mixed-Use Projects and Land Bank Land Bank
Cristal Tower – Porto Alegre (RS)
Location
Cristal Tower aerial perspective
Bridge connecting Cristal Tower to BarraShoppingSul.
Highlights: Conclusion Area PSV
2nd Half of 2011 11,910 m² > R$ 70 million
To be sold 31%
Sold 69%
%
Type
Area
Barra da Tijuca
100%
Office/Retail
36,748 m²
BarraShoppingSul
100%
Residential, Hotel
12,099 m²
Campo Grande
50%
Residential and Office/Retail
Maceió
50%
Residential, Office/Retail, Hotel
Jundiaí
100%
Office/Retail
45,000 m²
MorumbiShopping
100%
Office/Retail
21,554 m²
ParkShoppingBarigüi
84%
Apart-Hotel
ParkShoppingBarigüi
94%
Office/Retail
RibeirãoShopping
100%
Residential, Office/Retail, Medical
São Caetano
100%
Office/Retail
57,948 m²
ShoppingAnáliaFranco
36%
Residential
29,800 m²
Total
70%
338,913 m² 200,000 m²*
843 m² 27,370 m² 200,970 m²
971,245 m²
Contracts with undisclosed land swaps or buy option are not included * Shopping Maceió is included in our development pipeline and will occupy 70,000 m² of land
BarraShopping Complex
BarraShopping
BarraShoppingSul complex
Centro Empresarial
Royal Green
New York City
Barra Shopping
Península
Center
25
1Q09
BRAZIL AND SHOPPING CENTER MARKET MULTIPLAN PRESENTATION
OUR PORTFOLIO GROWTH STRATEGY MODELING FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
26
1Q09
How Does a Shopping Center Work? Stores Pay Rent to Stay Pay Key Money to Open
Urban Chaos
Shopping Malls
Generate
Pay Condo and
Sales
Promotion Fund
Demand for Shopping Malls
Income: • Rent • Key Money • Service Revenue
Pay Management
• Parking
& Brokerage Fee
Expenses: • Vacant Stores Costs • Headquarter • Refurbishment
Customers drive to Shopping Malls
Parking Lots
Generate People Flow
• Auditing • Legal
Tickets charged for Parking
• Others
27
1Q09
Revenue Breakdown* Real Estate & Others Grows with demand for projects near our malls (Mixed-use)
0.6%
14.9% Key money Grows after oppenings of new SC’s
Parking Revenue Grows with people flow
4.7% 14.6% Merchandising
Service Revenue Grows with higher SC performance
12.9% 3.8%
Rent
Grows with higher demand for alternative marketing Overage Grows with higher sales
65.2%
3 types of revenue
83.2%
Minimum Grows according to indexed contracts
* Based on 2008 figures
28
1Q09
Expenses Breakdown* Operating Expenses Breakdown Depreciation 10.1% Financial expense / revenue -1.1%
Other operating income/expenses -0.3% Headquarters 26.6%
Amortization 40.0%
Shopping malls 17.0% Equity in earnings of affiliates -2.2%
Parking 9.6% Cost of properties sold 0.4%
Taxes Breakdown 3.7%
Operating Expenses Headquarters
G&A expenses and some developments
Shopping center
All expenses related to malls, such as brokerage, vacant stores and auditing
Parking
Parking revenue forwarded to the shopping centers’ condominium
Cost of real estate sold
All costs and expenses related to the construction and selling of the real estate projects
Equity in earnings of affiliates
Comes mainly from the results of the Royal Green Península SPE
Amortization
Goodwill from minority acquisitions
Financial expense / revenue
Bank and non-bank debts and interest paid
Depreciation
Malls’ equipments (avg. 5 years) and the malls themselves (avg. 25 years)
Other operating revenues / expenses
Results that do not fit in the ordinary accounts mentioned above Taxes
Minority interest
34.3%
Deferred income and social contribution taxes Income and social contribution taxes
Tax income and social contribution
25% income tax, 9% social contribution
Differed taxes
Taxes related to the Bertolino’s reverse acquisition goodwill
Participation of the minority stockholders
Amount payed to the minority stockholders in consolidated companies
62.0%
* Based on 2008 figures
29
1Q09
Greenfield Ramp-Up
Assumptions of a Shopping Center project
Construction start: 6 months after the launch Construction Duration: 12-24 months (Expansions are usually faster than greenfields) Construction Cost: 3,000-6,000 R$/m² (Vertical Shoppings are more expensive than horizontal Shoppings. The parking may influence this cost) – average of 4,500 R$/m² Land Cost: 0-20,000 R$/m² (Sometimes, expansions account the former land of the shopping center. Hence, the price varies a lot) – average of 1,000 R$/m² Store Mix: 50% satellites in new shopping centers and 70% in expansions (May vary according with the location and purpose). Key money: 0-8,000 R$/m² (Anchors usually do not pay this fee) average of 1.500 R$/m² Standard Key money contracts: 20% on the signature of the contract and the rest in 24 monthly installments, beginning at the signature date. (Multiplan accrues this revenue, in our balance sheet, in 60 monthly installments after the opening). Until this date this amount was accumulated in our deferred income account). Satellites’ Rent: 50-250 R$/² per month, indexed by the IGP-DI with a real increase of 10% after the second and fourth year, and a double rent in December – average of 80 R$/m² per month (indexed value) Anchors’ Rent: these stores usually pay a percentage over their monthly revenue instead of the base rent. This fact occurs due to the anchors’ rent be four times less than the satellites’ rent – Average of 25 R$/m² per month (indexed by the IGP-DI). Others Revenues: Complementary: 2% of rent, merchandising: 8% of the rent and parking: 10% of the rent. All of these additional revenues are accounted only after the third year, depending on the project. NOI margin: 80-90% - average of 85%. Furthermore, still using this example, one can realize that in the third year there is a stronger increase (10%+2%+8%+10% = 30% + IGP-DI) and in the fifth year, there is a lesser increase of 10%. Multiplan tries to maintain this type of contract when the company has to renew it, thus, keeping both real increases of 10%.This is just an example, for more detailed information and examples, please consult our Earnings. DISCLAIMER: These are only assumptions which may vary significantly from one Shopping Center to another, therefore showing numbers substantially Different from the ones showed above. The company uses this as an example of a greenfield project, but does not consider as a guidance or goal. 30
1Q09
BRAZIL AND SHOPPING CENTER MARKET MULTIPLAN PRESENTATION
OUR PORTFOLIO GROWTH STRATEGY MODELING FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
31
1Q09
Operational Highlights * Total Sales
Rent Revenue
(R$ ’000)
+ 18.7%
5,069,694
(R$ ’000)
+ 23.3%
+263.8%
+84.3%
295,252
239,394
4,272,289 193,079
3,581,348
3,112,137 81,160
2,751,338
2004
2005
2006
2007
Main Sales Indexes
2008
2004
91,740
2005
2006
2008
Main Rent Indexes
2008
18.7%
2008
21.5%
12.5%
10.3%
9.1%
2007
10.6%
11.4%
SSR/m²
SAR/m²
7.9% 5.9%
Retail Sales * Considering 100% interest
IPCA
SSS/m²
SAS/m²
Sales
IGP-DI Adjustment Effect*
Rent
32
1Q09
Financial Highlights Net Revenue
Adj. EBITDA
(R$ ’000)
+ 22% +257%
411,231
(R$ ’000)
+ 18% +354%
336,393
250,621
212,163
252,970
143,804 115,240
138,110
55,200
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2006
+ 19%
+1,454%
240,599
119,378
2004
13,460
2006
209,185
101,867
33,700
2005
2008
176,007
200,174
23,850
2007
(R$ ’000)
(R$ ’000)
+909%
2005
Adj. Net Income
Adj. FFO (Funds From Operations) + 20%
2004
75,040
2007
2008
2004
23,790
2005
2006
2007
2008
33
1Q09
Net Debt/EBITDA of 0.7x Debt Breakdown
brAABB
Debentures issuance 900.000
Fixed 12%
CDI 25%
Others 1% TJLP 4%
Conclusion of the Bookbuilding: June 10th, 2009 Type: Simple, non-convertible, without collateral NonBank 35%
Amount: R$100 million Remuneration: 117% of CDI
IPCA 22%
Term: 721 days Bank 65%
TR 36%
Rating by Standard & Poor s: brAA900.000
Covenant: Net Debt/ EBITDA <= 2.75x EBITDA/ Net Financial Result >= 2,75x
Debt vs. Cash Generation
Debt Amortization *
(R$ ’000)
(R$ million) 80.2
364,337
51.8
40.4
Cash Position: R$ 187.2 million
Loans and financings Obligations for acquisition of goods
259,341 230,074
33.1 24.9
24.9
20.6 19.0 19.0 13.4 13.4
177,125
18.7 5.0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
>=2016
* Debt amortization on March 31, 2009 considering the refinancing of R$30 million occurred in April 2009
Gross Debt
Net Debt
Adjusted FFO (12M)* EBITDA (12M)*
* From April 2008 to March 2009
34
1Q09
Main Figures Indicators (R$ '000) Financials (MTE %) Gross Revenue Net Revenue Headquarters Rental Revenue Rental Revenue/m² Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted EBITDA Margin Adjusted FFO Adjusted FFO/m² Performance 100% Adjusted Total GLA (avg.) Adjusted Own GLA (avg.) Rental Revenue Rental Revenue /m² Total Sales Total Sales/m² Same Stores Sales/m² Same Stores Rent/m² Occupancy Costs * Rent as Sales % Others as Sales % Turnover * Occupancy Rate * Delinquency
2008 2007 452,914 368,792 411,231 336,393 (83,051) (54,951) 295,252 239,394 1,139 R$/m² 1,021 R$/m² 250,621 212,163 60.94% 63.07% 240,599 200,174 928 R$/m² 854 R$/m² 2008 2007 405,103 m² 376,827 m² 259,127 m² 234,358 m² 465,197 382,790 1,148 R$/m² 1,016 R$/m² 5,071,404 4,272,289 12,519 R$/m² 11,338 R$/m² 13,030 R$/m² 11,810 R$/m² 1,034 R$/m² 935 R$/m² 13.01% 14.90% 7.99% 8.42% 5.02% 6.48% 6.83% 5.20% 98.16% 97.36% 3.63% 5.43%
Var. % 1Q09 ▲22.8% 118,074 ▲22.2% 108,102 ▲51.1% 18,761 ▲23.3% 79,389 ▲11.5% 251 R$/m² ▲18.1% 59,947 ▼2.1 b.p 55.45% ▲20.2% 53,835 ▲8.7% 170 R$/m² Var. % 1Q09 ▲7.5% 470,488 m² ▲10.6% 316,378 m² ▲21.5% 133,022 ▲13.0% 283 R$/m² ▲18.7% 1,261,212 ▲10.4% 2,681 R$/m² ▲10.3% 2,961 R$/m² ▲10.6% 258 R$/m² ▼190 b.p 14.63% ▼43 b.p 8.81% ▼147 b.p 5.82% ▲163 b.p 1.36% ▲80 b.p 98.33% ▼179 b.p 5.79%
1Q08 89,339 80,892 11,712 60,564 249 R$/m² 50,910 62.94% 57,685 237 R$/m² 1Q08 377,981 m² 242,963 m² 96,407 255 R$/m² 1,045,791 2,767 R$/m² 2,817 R$/m² 228 R$/m² 13.62% 8.40% 5.22% 1.13% 97.93% 3.23%
Var. % ▲32.2% ▲33.6% ▲60.2% ▲31.1% ▲0.7% ▲17.8% ▼748.1 b.p ▼6.7% ▼28.3% Var. % ▲24.5% ▲30.2% ▲38.0% ▲10.9% ▲20.6% ▼3.1% ▲5.1% ▲13.2% ▲101.7 b.p ▲41.3 b.p ▲60.4 b.p ▲22.8 b.p ▲39.9 b.p ▲256.4 b.p
*Does not include BSS and SSU.
35
1Q09
Glossary Adjusted EBITDA: EBITDA adjusted for the non-recurring expenses with the IPO and restructuring costs. Adjusted Funds from Operations (FFO): sum of adjusted net income, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted Net Income: net income adjusted for non-recurring expenses with the IPO, restructuring costs and amortization of goodwill from acquisitions and mergers (including deferred taxes). Anchor Stores: Large, well known stores with special marketing and structural features that can attract consumers, thus ensuring permanent attraction and uniform traffic in all areas of the mall. Stores must have more than 1,000 m² to be considered anchors. Base Rent: The minimum rent of a tenant lease contract. If the tenant does not have a base rent, the minimum rent is a percentage of sales. Complementary Rent: The difference between the base rent and the rent consisting of a percentage of sales, as determined in the lease agreement. This amount is only paid if the percentage rent is higher than the base rent. EBITDA: Net income (loss) plus expenses with income tax and social contribution on net income, non-operating income, financial result, depreciation and amortization, minority interest and non-recurring expenses. EBITDA does not have a single definition, and this definition of EBITDA may not be comparable with the EBITDA used by other companies. Expected Income: Deferred key money and store buy back expenses. GCA: Gross Commercial Area, equivalent to the sum of all commercial areas in malls, in other words, GLA plus the stores sold. GLA: Gross Leasable Area, equivalent to the sum of all the areas available for lease in malls, excluding kiosks. IGP-DI Adjustment Effect: Is the weighted average of the monthly IGP-DI increase with a month of delay, divided by the percentage GLA that was adjusted on the respective month. Key Money (KM): Key money is the money paid by a tenant in order to have the right to be in a store. The key money contract when signed is accrued in the expected income account and accounts receivable, but its revenue is accrued in the key money revenue account in linear installments on the term of the leasing contract. Key money from initial leasing is contracts from new stores of new developments or expansions (opened in the last 5 years); ’Operating’ key money from turnover are contracts from stores that are moving in a mall already in operations. Law 11,638: On December 28, 2008, amendments were added to the Brazilian Corporate Law (Law No. 11,638) that introduced changes to accounting practices generally accepted in Brazil, effective for fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2008. The Law designed primarily to update accounting practices under Brazilian Corporate Law 'to enable the convergence of Brazilian accounting practices with accounting standards generally accepted in the international capital markets. (Source: Deloitte – IASB) Merchandising: Merchandising consists of all leases in a mall not involving the GLA area of the mall. Merchandise includes revenue from kiosks, stands, posters, leasing of pillar space, doors and escalators and other display locations in a mall. Net Operating Income (NOI): Refers to the sum of the operating income (rental revenue and shopping expenses) and income from parking operations (revenue and expenses). Revenue taxes are not considered. The NOI + KM also includes the key money from the contracts signed in the same period. Occupancy: Leased area divided by the total GLA of a mall. Own GLA: or Company's GLA or Multiplan GLA, refers to total GLA weighted by Multiplan’s interest in each mall. Parking: Parking revenue is the total amount (100%) of revenue collected by the shopping centers. The parking expenses are the share of the parking revenue that needs to be passed to the company’s partners and condominiums. Potential Sales Volume (PSV) or Total Sell Out: Refers to the total number of units for sale in a real estate development, multiplied by the list price of each. Sales: Sales declared by the stores in each of the malls. Same Area Rent/m²: Rent of the same area of the year before divided by the area’s GLA less vacancy. Same-Store Rent/m²: Rent earned from stores that were in operation for over a year. Same Area Sales/m²: Sales of the same area of the year before divided by the area’s GLA less vacancy. Same-Store Sales/m²: Sales of stores that were in operation for over a year. Satellite Stores: Small stores with no special marketing and structural features located around the anchor stores and intended for general retailing.
36
1Q09
IR Contact Armando d’Almeida Neto CFO and Investors Relation Director
Hans Christian Melchers
Planning & Investor Relations Manager
Rodrigo Tiraboschi
Investor Relations Analyst Senior
Franco Carrion
Investor Relations Analyst
Tel.: +55 (21) 3031-5224 Fax: +55 (21) 3031-5322
E-mail:
[email protected]
http://www.multiplan.com.br/ri Disclaimer This document may contain prospective statements. which are subject to risks and uncertainties. as they were based on expectations of the Company’s management and on available information. These prospects include statements concerning our management’s current intentions or expectations. Readers/investors should be aware that many factors may mean that our future results differ from the forward-looking statements in this document. The Company has no obligation to update said statements. The words "anticipate“, “wish“, "expect“, “foresee“, “intend“, "plan“, "predict“, “forecast“, “aim" and similar words are intended to identify affirmations. Forward-looking statements refer to future events which may or may not occur. Our future financial situation, operating results, market share and competitive positioning may differ substantially from those expressed or suggested by said forward-looking statements. Many factors and values that can establish these results are outside the company’s control or expectation. The reader/investor is encouraged not to completely rely on the information above. 37