Motion To Amend

MOTION TO FURTHER AMEND CHRC STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS BY EMAIL ArthurTopham Pub/Ed TheRadicalPress Box 4633BarkervilleHwy B.C.V2J 6T8 Quesnel. EmaiI: q{Liqq!!j!!ii!alp1s$,e11! April23, 2009 Nancyl-afontant RegistryOfficer Canadian HumanRightsTribunal \!rq.!=dsua i.\!4tqh-g!.r! DearNancyLafontant, RE: Harry AbrNmsand the Leaguefor Human Rightsof B'nai Brith Canadav. Arthur Tophamand the RadicalPress.com Filc Number: T1360/9008 Themotioncontained hereinbearsupontheAmendedStatement ofParticularswhichthe Respondent, ArthurTopham.receivedftom commission counsel,DanielPoulin.dated April 8. 2009. Thereis oneadditionalissueof immediateconcemcontainedin the sectionofthc AmendedStatement of Particulars titled"lSSUFlS"whichrequiresimmediateredress. In this sectionMr. Poulinhasstated: ''Theissuel9:blrdised he,fore the Tribunalin thiscaseis as.follows: Did lheRespondents communicete or cduseto becommunicaled. in ||holeor in part. bt meansofa compuler,including lhe inlerrur. any mtLrcrthat is likely tLtcxpLtse Jewsantl olhernon-u,hite[sic] to hdtredor contempL contraryh sectionI 3 o.ftheCafiadiun HumanRightsAct? The wordingof thisstatement needsto bechangedin orderto reflectandcomplywith the actualissueasoutlined in theoriginalcomplaint by HarryAbramsandtheLeague for HumanRightsof B'naiBrithCanada. Apartfrom thefaulty useofthe Englishlanguage, whichappears to beendemic throughout themajorityof thecorrespondence receivedthusfar by the respondent from theTribunal(andthisis stated withoutmalice), thenature of thiscomplaint andthe extremeimportance of it to themajorityof Canadians regarding thedeliberately olanned

precedent whichthecomplainants hopeto establish, demandsthatthe actualalleged complaintbeclearlystatedratherthanthe nebulous, poorlywordedtext which Mr. Poulinhasprofferedall partiesas the "lssue"in thiscomplaintcase. Allow me to remindtheTribunaland all partiesthatthiscomplaintcontainswording whichwill. if successfully accomplished radicallyalterthe abilityof by the complainants, specialinterestgroupssuchas B'nai Brith Canadaandtheircounterparts. the Canadian (now a subsidiary JewishCongress ofthe Canadian Councilfor lsraelandJewish Advocacy).theJewishDefenseLeagueandthe SimonWeisenthal Center,et al to usethe nefarioussectionl3 of the CHR Ad to chargeanyonein Canadawith "anti Semitism"or "hatecrimes"who mightcriticizeany aspectof lsraelidomesticandforeignpolicyor the ideological foundationuponwhichthe stateof lsraelis premisedwhich is, by definition, commonlyknownas PoliticalZionism. As such,in the commission's Statement of Paniculars, this aspectof the "ISSUES"has beeneither purposelyoverlookedand deliberatelyalteredin orderto deflectaway from the originalwordingso asto complywith the subterfuge of the complainants or elseit is merelyan unwining error on the part of someonewho hasn'ta sulficient graspof the Englishlanguage or the legalexpeniseto realizethe importance or importof retaining the preciseoriginalwording.In the caseof Mr. Poulin.counselfor thecommission,I cannotacceptthat he is unawareof the importanceof the natureofthe wording so that leavesonly oneof the othertwo optionsand at this pointI'm not willing to speculate on whichof themit mightbe. WhatI do expectthough,in fact demandin the form of a request. is thattheTribunal onceagainsetthingsrightand levelthe playingfield backto its originalcontoursby instructing text,"andothernon whitelsicl"and the commission to deletethedeceptive replaceit with theoriginaltext of thecomplaintwhichreads."and/orcitizensof Israel". The necessity for doingso oughtnot to be incongruous counselMr. to the complainant's Kurz andthe manifestreasonableness of doingso should.follow theaboveexplanation, alsobe evidentto boththeTribunaland Mr. Poulin. Ilthere is any further lbrmality or motion thal you require,pleaselet me know as soonas oossible. Sincerely.

ArthurTophampro se Publisher/Editor TheRadicalPress.com Cc: DanielPoulin.counsel.Canadian HumanRightsCommission MarvinKurz.Counsel.B'nai Brith Canada

HarryAbrams, Complainant AnitaBromberg, Co-cornplainant