Mosfet

  • Uploaded by: Sristick
  • 0
  • 0
  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Mosfet as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 2,814
  • Pages: 8
1 Basics Most applications for currents of some 10A use transistors with silicon chips that are integrated in potential-free power modules. These modules contain one or several transistor systems, diodes adapted to the transistors (free-wheeling diodes) and, if required, passive components and „intelligence“, see chapter 1.4..1.6. Despite the disadvantage of one-side cooling, power modules are maintaining their hold in highpower electronics against the meanwhile also available disc-cells with IGBTs and diodes, which are able to dissipate about 30 % more of the heat losses by two-side cooling. This is mainly due to „integrated“, tested isolation of the chips to the heatsink, possible combinations of different components in one module and low costs due to batch production, apart from their easy assembly. IGBT-modules especially, are going through a permanently successful process of market penetration accompanied by increased efficiency, withstanding the new and further development of other - competitive - power semiconductors. Today IGBT-modules are produced managing a forward blocking voltage of 6.5 kV, 4.5 kV, 3.3 kV and 2.5 kV, e.g. 3.3 kV/2.4 kA [192], [196]. IGBT converters (multi-level-switch and IGBTs in series connection) for the MW-range up to more than 6 kV supply voltage can already be produced now . MOSFETs, on the other hand, are being developed for even higher frequency applications; also in the high current range more than 500 kHz can be produced with the corresponding wirings and assembly topologies. Apart from the small power application range, for which chip-on-chip solutions are gaining more and more importance, IGBT and MOSFETmodules are the basic components for the integration of complete electronic and also mechatronic systems in future.

1.2

Power MOSFET and IGBT

1.2.1 Different structures and functional principles In the following descriptions we restrict ourselves to n-channel-enhancement power MOSFETs and IGBTs (enhancement transistors), representing the majority of transistors used in power modules. If a positive control voltage is applied, a conducting channel with electrons as charge carriers (majority carriers) is generated within the existing p-conducting silicon. Without applying a control voltage, these components would block (self-blocking). Other designs, which will not be dealt with any further in this chapter, are p-channelenhancement transistors (induction of a positively charged channel within p-silicon by applying negative control voltage/self-blocking) and n- and p-channel depletion types (depletion transistors), which turn on without applied control voltage (self-conducting). In these transistors, the control voltage generates a space charge zone that cuts off the channel and interrupts the main current flow. In most applications the vertical structures shown in Figure 1.2 and Figure 1.4 are used, where gate and source (MOSFET) or emitter (IGBT) are located on top of the chip, whereas the chip bottom serves as drain (MOSFET) or collector connection. The load current is conducted vertically through the chip outside the channel. The power MOSFETs and IGBTs shown in the sections have a planar gate structure, i.e. a lateral (horizontal) conductive channel is generated in case of on-state. The planar gate, which has been further developed to the double-implanted gate in modern highdensity transistors, is the dominating gate structure for power MOSFETs and IGBTs still today. 14

1 Basics However, recently developed transistors have a trench-gate-structure, with the gates integrated vertically to the structure. During on-state, a vertical channel is generated on both sides of the gate. These and other new developments not dealt with any further in this chapter will be discussed in chapter 1.2.4. The lateral MOSFET- and IGBT-structures taken over from microelectronics also have their drain- or collector layer allocated on their chip surface as n+-(MOSFET) or p+-well. Load current is conducted horizontally through the chip. Since the n-zone can be isolated to the ICsubstrate by an oxide layer, several isolated MOSFETs or IGBTs may be integrated together with other structures on one chip. Due to the fact that lateral transistors are only able to generate a current density of about 30 % of that in vertical structures and, thus, require more space on the assembly, they are used preferably in complex, monolithic circuits. The structural design of the power MOSFET (Figure 1.2) as well as the IGBT (Figure 1.4) consists of a silicon-micro-cellular structure of up to 820,000 cells per cm2 (latest high-tech 60 V-MOSFETs) or about 100,000 cells per cm2 (high-voltage-IGBTs) distributed over a chip surface of 0.3...1.5 cm2. The cell-sections show the analogue structure of the MOSFET and IGBT control zones. The n--zone has to take up the space charge zone during off-state and accommodates p-charged wells with a low marginal (p-) and a high central (p+) doping. These wells also include n+-silicon-layers which are connected to the aluminium- metallized source (MOSFET) or emitter (IGBT) electrode. A control zone (gate) consisting, for example, of n+-polysilicon is embedded in a thin isolation layer of SiO2 above the n+-areas. By applying a sufficient positive control voltage between gate and source (MOSFET) or emitter (IGBT), an inversion layer (n-conducting channel) is generated in the p-area below the gate. Electrons may be conducted from source or emitter to the n--drift-area via this channel. In contrast to the identical structure of MOSFET and IGBT including the n--zone, there are differences regarding the third electrode, which will determine all further functions.

15

1 Basics

Power-MOSFET [277] Source

A´ Gate



Source D

Drain

Al

SiO2 n

+

-

d

-

p-

p-

-

Gate

-

+

p

G

+

p

S

-

Source

-

D

-

Drain

-

Gate

G

-

nn+

nn+

-

B

a)

S

A Drain

-

-

Source

b)

A-B: wide of elementary cell d: length of channel

Figure 1.2

Power-MOSFET (SIPMOS Siemens) a) MOSFET-cell with charge flow during on-state b) Common switch symbols

Figure 1.2 explains the structure and function of a vertical n-channel-enhancement powerMOSFET with planar gate structure. The MOSFET’s layer structure described above results from epitaxial, implantation and diffusion processes on a substrate of n+-conductive silicon material with a drain contact on its reverse side. The electrons flowing in the electrical voltage field between drain and source are attracted by the drain connection, thus absorbing the space charge zone; consequently, the drain-source voltage will decrease and the main current (drain current) will be able to flow. Since the electrons are conducting current by 100 % and are majority charge carriers in the n-drift area, the highly resistive n--zone will not be flooded by bipolar charge carriers; the MOSFET is a unipolar component. Whereas the drain-source on-resistance of low-voltage MOSFETs is composed of single cellular resistances about 5 % to 30 %, 95 % of the RDS(on) of high reverse voltage MOSFETs result from the n--epitaxial area resistance. Therefore, on-state voltage drop VDS(on) = I D ⋅ R DS(on)

with ID:

drain current and

R DS(on) = k ⋅ V(BR)DS 2.4...2.6

with k:

material constant, e.g. k = 8.3 ⋅ 10 -9 A -1 for a chip surface of 1 cm2; Drain-source forward breakdown voltage

V(BR)DS:

as a theoretical limit value of the actually available MOSFETs is always higher for MOSFETs from about 200...400 V off-state voltage than for comparable bipolar components and the current 16

1 Basics carrying capacity is lower. Recently developed structures with improved parameters will be dealt with in chapter 1.2.4. On the other hand, there are no storage effects because the majority charge carriers are exclusively responsible for charge transportation. Very short switching times may be produced however, requiring rather high control currents for changing the internal capacitances in the case of extensive components (high voltage/ high current) with about 0.3 µC per cm2 chip surface. The capacitances resulting from the physical structure of the MOSFETs are the most important parasitic elements in Figure 1.3; their influence on the characteristics of components will be described in the corresponding chapters. Source

CGS

Gate

RG

Source

D

(Drain)

Al

SiO2 n+

RW p-

CGD

RD

pp+

p+ CDS

CGD

CDS

RD

RG G (Gate) CGS

RW

nn+

nn+

S

Drain

a)

"Inverse Diode"

(Source)

b)

Figure 1.3

Power-MOSFET-cell with the most important parasitic elements a) Parasitic elements within the cellular structure b) Equivalent circuit with parasitic elements

The follwing table explains causes and designations of the parasitic capacitances and resistances in Figure 1.3: Symbol

Designation

CGS

Gate-source capacitance

CDS

GGD RG

RD RW

Overlapping gate and source metallization; dependent on gate-source voltage; independent of drain-source voltage Drain-source capacitance Junction capacitance between n--drift zone and pwell; dependent on cell surface, drain-source breakdown voltage and drain-source voltage Gate-drain capacitance Miller capacitance; generated by overlapping of gate and n--drift zone Gate resistance (internal) Poly-silicon-gate resistance; in modules with several transistor chips often additional series resistors are needed to minimize oscillations between chips Drain resistance Resistance of n--zone; often main part of MOSFET-on-state-resistance Lateral resistance of p- Base-emitter resistance of parasitic npn- bipolar well transistor

17

1 Basics IGBT [278] Emitter +

A´ Gate



Emitter +

+

p+

n+

-

+

+

d

-

p-

-

+

Collector C

Al

SiO2 +

p-

G Gate

+ +

-

p+

E Emitter

-

+

+

-

+

+ -

+

+

+

+ -

+

+

+

+ -

+

+

+

+ -

+

+

+

np+

+ 2

3

+ 1

B +

1

Collector C

+ 3

G Gate

np+

2

A + -

Collector

-

+

+

A-B: wide of elementary cell d: length of channel

a)

Figure 1.4

E Emitter

b)

IGBT with NPT-structure a) IGBT-cell with charge distribution during on-state b) Common switch symbols

Figure 1.4 explains structure and function of a vertical n-channel-enhancement IGBT with planar gate and NPT-(Non-Punch-Through)-structure. In contrast to MOSFETs, IGBTs are equipped with a p+-conductive area with connection to the collector below the n-zone. After having passed the n--drift area, the electrons enter the p+-area, thus arranging for positive charge carriers (holes) to be injected from the p+-zone to the n--zone. The injected holes will flow directly from the drift-area to the emitter-p-contact as well as laterally to the emitter passing the MOS-channel and the n-well. In this way the n--drift area will be flooded with charge carriers which are conducting the main current (collector current); this charge enhancement will lead to a space charge reduction and, consequently, to a reduction of the collector-emitter voltage. Although, compared to the pure ohmic on-state behaviour of the MOSFET, the IGBT has an additional threshold voltage at the collector pn-junction layer, the on-state voltage of highvoltage IGBTs (from about 400V) is lower than that of MOSFETs because of the enhancement of minority carriers in the highly resistive n--zone. In comparison to MOSFETs, IGBTs may be designed for considerably higher voltages and currents for similar chip surfaces. On the other hand, the surplus p-storage charge QS that has not been extracted during the collector voltage increase period has to recombine in the n--zone during turn-off. Qs has an almost linear characteristic in the low-current range and rises proportionally to the forward current in the rated current and overcurrent range according to a radical law. [282]: Qs ∼ I0.8...1 in the low-load forward current range Qs ∼ I0.5 in the rated current and overcurrent range. 2...2.7 Qs ∼V(BR)CE

18

1 Basics Storage charge enhancement and depletion processes cause switching losses, a delay time (storage time) and a collector tail-current during turn-off. (see chapter 1.2.3). Apart from the ”Non-Punch-Through”-structure (NPT) shown in Figure 1.3, the ”PunchThrough” (PT)-structure is also applied in IGBTs today. It was the conceptional basis for the first IGBTs. Basically, the two structures differ in the PT-IGBT’s highly-doped n+-layer (buffer layer) between n-- and p+-zone and in the manufacturing process. Whereas the n+- and n--layers in a PT-IGBT are usually generated on a p+-substrate by an epitaxial procedure, the basis of the NPT-IGBT is a thin, hardly doped n-wafer, at the reverse side of which the collector p+-zone is generated by implantation. The MOS-control zones on top of both IGBTs are identical in their planar structure. Figure 1.5 compares both IGBT-structures and their electrical field characteristics during offstate. Gate

Emitter

Al n

E

Emitter

p

p

n

p

n-

n-

p+ n+

n+ p+

x

A Collector

a) Gate

Emitter

Al n

p

n-

p

p

n

E

Emitter

n-

p

p

p

x Collector

b)

Figure 1.5

IGBT-structures and off-state electrical field characteristics [193] a) PT-IGBT b) NPT-IGBT

19

1 Basics The space charge zone in a PT-IGBT or IGET (E: epitaxial structure) spreads over the whole n-area during off-state. In order to keep the epitaxial layer as thin as possible for high off-state voltages also, the electrical field is reduced by the highly doped n+-buffer at the end of the n-drift area. The n--drift area in an NPT-IGBT or IGHT (H: homogeneous structure) is dimensioned large enough so that the electrical field can be completely discharged within the n--drift area during off-state at maximum off-state voltage. The electrical field cannot spread over the whole n--zone (punch through) within the permissible operation range. For further explanations on IGBT-functions and the deviating characteristics of PT- and NPTcomponents it is, first of all, necessary to study the equivalent circuit resulting from the IGBTstructure (Figure 1.6b). Emitter

CGE

RG

Gate

Emitter

C (Collector) Al

SiO 2 n+

RW p

p-

CGC p-

RD

p

+

+

CGC

CCE

RG

RD

G (Gate)

CCE

RW

CGE

np+

np+

(Emitter) E

Collector

a)

Figure 1.6

b)

IGBT-cell (NPT-structure) with the most important parasitic elements a) Parasitic elements in the cellular structure b) Equivalent circuit with parasitic elements

Causes and designations of the parasitic capacitances and resistances in Figure 1.6 are analogous to Figure 1.3. Symbol CGE

CCE

GGC RG

RD

20

Designation Gate-emitter capacitance

Overlapping gate and source metallization; dependent on gate-emitter voltage; independent of collector-emitter voltage Collector-emitter Junction capacitance between n--drift zone and pcapacitance well; dependent on cell surface, drain-source breakdown voltage and drain-source voltage Gate-collector capacitance Miller-capacitance: generated by overlapping of gate and n--drift zone Gate resistance (internal) Poly-silicon-gate resistance; in modules with several transistor chips often additional series resistors are needed to minimize oscillations between chips Drift resistance Resistance of n--zone (base resistance of a pnptransistor)

1 Basics Symbol RW

Designation Lateral resistance of p- Base-emitter resistance of the parasitic npnwell bipolar transistor

Apart from internal capacitances and resistances, the equivalent circuit of the IGBT also shows features of the „ideal MOSFET“ and the parasistic npn-transistor: n+-emitter zone (emitter)/p+well (base)/n-drift zone (collector) with the lateral p+-well resistance below the emitters as baseemitter resistance RW. In addition to that a pnp-transistor may be generated by sequence of p+collector (emitter)/ n--drift (base)/ p+-well (collector), which represents together with the npntransistor thyristor circuit. Latch-up of this parasitic thyristor may happen basically during on-state (when a critical current density is exceeded, which decreases with rising chip temperature) and also during turn-off (dynamic latch-up due to the increased hole current compared to on-state operation), as soon as the following latch-up preconditions are met: M ⋅ (α npn + α pnp ) = 1 M: αnpn, αpnp: αT: γE:

with

α pnp , α npn = α T ⋅ γ E

multiplication factor; current gain of the single transistors in base circuit; base transportation factor; emitter efficiency

This will lead to a loss of controllability of the IGBT and, therefore, to its destruction. The following design measures will reliably prevent latch-up in modern IGBTs under all permissible static and dynamic operation conditions; the turn-off current density of dynamic latch-up, for example, is about 15 times the rated current density. At first, the base-emitter resistance RW of the npn-transistor is reduced by means of - high doping of the p+-well directly below the n-emitters, and - shortening of the n-emitters to such an extent, that the threshold voltage of the npn-transistor base-emitter diode will not be reached in any permissible state of operation. Furthermore, the hole current (npn-transistor base current) is kept on a minimum level by a low current amplification in the pnp-transistor. However, switching behaviour and ruggedness have to be optimized with the on-state characteristics which also depend considerably on the pnptransistor design. This has been produced for PT- and NPT-IGBTs in different ways [278]. For PT-IGBTs, the efficiency (emitter efficiency) of hole injection of the p+-zone into the n--drift area is very high, since the substrate is very thick and highly doped. The pnp-current amplification may only be lowered with the help of the base transportation factor (n--drift zone, n+-buffer), implementing additional recombination centres (e.g. by gold doping or electron beam radiation) to reduce charge carrier life time in the n+-zone. The hole current adds up to 40...45 % of the total current. In case of NPT-IGBTs the p+-emitter zone generated at the collector by implantation is much thinner than the PT-IGBT-substrate. Therefore, the doping material concentration can be exactly dimensioned during wafer production. The very thin p+-layer guarantees a low emitter efficiency (γE = 0,5) of the pnp-transistor, so that it is not necessary to lower the base transportation factor by reducing charge carrier life time. The hole current sums up to 20...25 % of the total current. 21

Related Documents

Mosfet
November 2019 31
Mosfet
April 2020 19
Mosfet
November 2019 27
Mosfet
May 2020 11
Mosfet
December 2019 23
Mosfet
November 2019 22

More Documents from "Mauricio Avila"

06-current And Voltage
December 2019 22
Igbt
December 2019 27
19-ac Motor Protection
December 2019 44