Methods of Research Res. 1 E
Prof. Ana L. Vargas
1
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
What is a Literature Review?
survey or examination of scholarly articles, books and other sources (e.g. dissertations, journal, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, or area of research.
It provides description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work (each research article)
It offer an overview of significant literatures published on a topic (overview the state-of-theart).
What is the difference between Literature and Studies?
Related Literature
Concepts and ideas related to the study
Related Studies
Studies that has been conducted with similar bearing the study being conducted.
A good literature review must …
established the state of knowledge about the particular topic you are proposing to research,
provides a convincing argument that the topic is important, and will address an important gap in knowledge or understanding.
A good literature review (cont’d) …
Provide the context for your proposed research
It is organized around, and related directly to, your research questions or objectives.
Demonstrate why the topic you are studying is important and timely
It presents an analysis of what is known and not known and significant gaps in knowledge or understanding
A good literature review (cont’d.) …
Show relationship between previous studies
It moves logically toward, or reinforces, your research questions, purpose or objectives.
Be defined by a guiding concept – your research purpose, objectives or questions
It is analytic as opposed to a mere description of all previous research, a catalogue of who said what, or just a long compilation of facts
A good literature review (cont’d.) …
Find out what information already exist in your field of research
Find other people working in your field
Identify main methodologies and research techniques
Identify main ideas, conclusions and theories and establish similarities and differences
Identify gaps in literature
Types of Literature Review
Evaluative review
Explorative review
Instrumental review
Methods or methodological review
Theory review
Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
9
Evaluative review
provides discussion of the literature in terms of its coverage and contribution to knowledge in particular area.
Often used to directly compare research findings of a project with other when findings are directly available Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
10
Explorative review
Seek to find out what actually exists in the academic literature in terms of theory, empirical evidence & research methods as they pertain to specific topic & its related wider subject area.
Used to sharpen, focus & identify research question that remain unanswered in the specific topic Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
11
Instrumental review
Seek to find out how to conduct some research on a highly specific research problem.
NOT designed to identify the current knowledge in an area but to identify the best way to carry out a research with out incurring unnecessary & unavoidable cost
Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
12
Methodological review
Different methods, relative to the research, are introduced and explored.
Applications of each method are demonstrated. Strengths and limitations are discussed
Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
13
Importance of literature review
provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic
useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field
provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation
emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
14
Importance of literature review evaluate promising research methods
helps the investigator understand his topic or research better. ensures that there will be no duplication of other studies identify new ways to interpret research results gives the researcher a feeling of confidence Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
15
Sources of information Related Literature Related Studies Books
Journals
Newspaper
Thesis
magazines
Dissertations
Internet
Internet
How to Find Relevant Literatures?
Search with the key‐word of the research topic.
Use broader key‐word (term) if the documents retrieved are few or none. Use narrower key‐word if the documents retrieved are too much.
Use synonym or related terms to enhance the search Employ Boolean operator: AND, OR, NOT to control the search
Pick the most recent and related article to start with.
Related Literature Process
write all bibliographic information, i.e., author(s), complete title, publisher, date and place of publication, and so on
PARAPHRASE!...
Do NOT “copy & paste” Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
18
Stages of Literature Reviews Steps in research process
Kinds of literature to be reviewed
Purpose of review
Identification • source materials: • gained prelim orientation textbooks & background & selection of problem • latest publication on the discipline • gain up-to-date knowledge in the field • theses/journals in • identify research gaps the selected in the field discipline
• know the works already done on the subject • avoid duplication Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
19
Stages of Literature Reviews
Steps in research process
Kinds of literature to be reviewed
Purpose of review
Formulation of the • Previous study in • be familiar with appropriate methodology selected problem the field & journals & research techniques relevant to the study
Operationalization • Previous study in • For clarifying concepts the field & journals and knowing concepts • Illustrated books on research Preparation of methodology research proposals • Thesis
measurements techniques
• Develop alternative design • For formulating hypothesis and deciding sample design, etc.
Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
20
Stages of Literature Reviews
Steps in research process Construction of tools for data collection
Kinds of literature to be reviewed • books on research methodology • Thesis
• Copies of tools and scales furnished in the appendix of the theses Drafting theoretical chapters & theory parts of other chapters
• Journals • Textbooks • Reference books
Purpose of review • For gaining thorough knowledge of the process of tools and measurement techniques
• To take notes and compile bibliography
• Reports on subject matter Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
21
How to Review Literature
Compare: try to find the similarities among literatures
Explain how each article similar to the others.
Contrast: try to find the differences among literatures
Explain how each article differ to the others Criticize: put your own opinion on what is written in the literatures
How to Review Literature
Criticize the strength and weakness of the research Synthesize: combine several literatures into an idea Summarize: restate the article with your own words in a concise way
Points to Consider when Reviewing RL
Provenance
What are the author's credentials? Are the author's arguments supported by evidence (e.g. primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings)?
Objectivity
Is the author's perspective even‐handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point?
Points to Consider when Reviewing RL Persuasiveness
Which of the author's theses are most/least convincing?
Value
Are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject?
Points to Discuss in RL
What is the problem and why is it important?
Is the problem clearly defined?
Try to state the problem as simply as you can
Is the research methodology well stated?
How’s the data being created and manipulated?
Points to Discuss in RL
Is the manipulated data sufficiently interpreted?
What is the contribution of the study?
Is the conclusion related to the problems?
Is the evidence sufficient enough to support conclusion? etc.
Sample Review Literature Title of the article: A Dynamic Framework for classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches
Theoretical Framework
Backbone of the study
Statements of theories from other researchers or authorities that has bearing with the study being conducted.
Statement of the researcher’s own theory.
Great Man Theory
Shared Leadership Theory Jesuit Leadership Theory
Converging Theory
Self Awareness
Ingenuity
Love
Heroism
School Managers
Theoretical Framework
PSU
Community
Conceptual Framework
Serve as guide in the conduct of the study.
heart of the study
Outlines the study into input, process and output.
organizers , the key ideas that organize and shape your thinking
Relates the independent and dependent variable.
Can be presented in the form of: flow diagrams, tree diagrams, mind maps or even shape based diagrams.
CONCEPTUAL PARADIGM
INPUTS
Learning needs of the students Limited instructional materials Academic performance Drive and motivation to learn PROCESS
FEEDBACKS
Needs assessment of the students. Design of Computer Aided Instruction for Chemistry Experimentation Behavioral changes and learning skills evaluation
Comments and suggestions from the panel of evaluators, colleagues and students
OUTPUT Instructional Material for Stoichiometry and Gas Laws in PowerPoint presentation Teacher’s Manual or User’s Guide for Computer Aided Instruction
Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
34
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE LEARNER Behaviorism Theory “Learning is any change in behavior.”
Learning Environment Information Processing Theory “The brain process and stores information .”
Researcher’s Theory: PowerPoint Learning Theory The efficiency of teachinglearning process can be upgraded if used with PowerPoint Presentations.
Brain Based Learning Theory “The brain has a virtually inexhaustible capacity to learn.”
Learning Environment Bruner’s Learning Theory “Learning theory involves three simultaneous processes: acquisition, transformation and evaluation.
Promoting cultural competence
Creating a student-centered classroom
Transforming Education through a Communities of Learners
Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
Enhancing learning through technology
36
Socioeconomics Status Gender Income Education Psychographic characteristics
Knowledge
Practice
Program Exposure
Family Characteristics Attitude Interpersonal Contacts
Prof. Ana L. Vargas, MS EnE
37
Contextual and Community factors • Socioeconomic development
• Socioeconomic status
• Domestic violence norm
• Life cycle process
• Gender Inequality
• Intergenerational exposure to violence
• Crime levels
• Risk factors
Household and Individual factors
Domestic violence
Women status autonomy
Synthesis of the State of the Art
Summary of the researches consolidated which has direct bearing with the study.
Statements of similarities and differences of the reviewed related literatures and studies.
Gap Bridged by the Study
determines the blank or the missing knowledge that has not been filled up or conducted.
state the unique feature of your study in comparison with the reviewed literature/study
method requirements, features, materials used in the study (based from the synthesis of-the-art
statement of originality of the study
lead to the feasibility (doable) study
Definition of term
Provides the conceptual or operational definition of the key terms used in the study.
Conceptual definition – based on dictionary or other sources. Operational definition- a working definition of terms as used in the study.
Only important terms taken from the title, statement of the problem, assumptions, hypothesis, and the research paradigm are to be defined.
Learning check
Review related literature and studies.
Prepare your theoretical framework.
Prepare your conceptual framework.
Prepare your chapter 2.