Memo Of State Department Ig Interview Of Consular Officer Who Issued Visa To 9/11 Hijacker Satam Al Suqami

9/11 Working-level Employee

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED

I \ STATES INFORMATION AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

l\e of Inspector General

|\m of Conversation \s for the 9/11 Hijackers 1\

Foreign Service Institute

2/6/03

Office

Date

Bert Krieg and Kevin Hrvnkow Official

Inspector

Mr. Krieg stated that the purpose of the interview was to respond to a congressional request that OIG report on visa issuance to 9/11 hijackers. He added that OIG will protect the identities of the adjudicators and that OIG's response will not single out specific individuals. I

\d the questions for the visa adjudicators given to her and answered them as follows.

1. For the record, please tell me your name, present rank and position.

2. Were you the officer (or consular associate) who issued nonimmigrant visas to (names of \) on (dates) at (name of post)? | [examined the computerized visafilesof Satam Al Suqami who was issued an NIV on Nov. 21,2000 at Riyadh. Yes, this appears to be a copy of his application.

3. Is this a copy of the application?

Yes. If no application is available, then why is it not available?

N/A 4. Did you check the CLASS lookout system for his name, and what were the results?

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED We always had to check CLASS to issue or refuse a visa. There were no "hits" or derogatory information in his case. In identifying terrorists and criminals we depended on_CLASS, information from other agencies at post, and the Visa Viper (terrorist lookout) Program. 5. Did you interview this individual prior to issuing the visa? Yes. I noted from Al Suqami's visa application that he was a dealer, which is a Saudi euphemism for businessman. There was nothing unusual about him. He was one of many Saudis whose family was well off. Younger Saudis wanted to experience nightlife in New York and the U.S.; there was none, no entertainment, in Riyadh. 6. If not, why not? N/A 7. What was the policy at post regarding personal appearance waivers? I tried to interview as many as possible, but normally I did not have time to interview that many applicants. Personal appearances were the exception at Riyadh. We didn't have the time to interview many applicants. 8. How were you informed of this policy? In writing? Orally? By whom? It was just my general understanding and knowledge. 9. Were you personally given any instructions by your supervisors or superiors about asking applicants to appear in person for an interview? No. 10. Did a travel agency submit the case? No. 11. If so, what was the policy at post regarding travel agency procedures? We didn't use travel agents at that time. 12. How were you informed of this policy? In writing? Orally? By whom? I helped develop the Visas Express program later in 2001, and even then we never permitted travel agents to influence the issuance of visas. Their job was to provide the data and help fill out visa applications. 13. Would a personal interview of this applicant have helped you decide his eligibility for a visa, and why? I interviewed him. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 14. If you interviewed this individual, what details can you recall? I do recall this specific case - however, he was just another young Saudi with a profile like any other - nothing remarkable about him. I have a photographic memory, and I remember his photo. If I had to do it again under the same circumstances, I would issue him another visa. The Saudis, Bahrain and the U.A.E. all could have been Visa waiver countries because of their low visa refusal rates, but probably because the were Middle East countries they were not included. These nationals were also cleared by the INS at ports of entry in the U.S. 15. Did he present any documents in support of his application? He had a passport and all the right paperwork. 16. If so, can you recall any details of the documents that were presented? No. I can't recall anything unusual. 17. What specific elements obtained from the interview or the application convinced you that this applicant was entitled to a visa? There was nothing negative. His story made sense, like so many others. There was nothing remarkable about him. 18. Did you have sufficient time to conduct the interview or review the application to your satisfaction? If not, how much time would you have preferred? Yes, I think I had plenty of time. 19. If there were sufficient consular officers at post to conduct personal interviews of every visa applicant, would there have been sufficient interview windows, work space and support staff? The assumption was that we didn't need to interview everyone. If we had more time, more might have been interviewed. But then we would not have had enough interview windows or other support. Everything at that time was geared towards getting visas out quicker and in a customer friendly way. I arrived early and stayed late at the embassy, from 7 am to 9 pm and later. 20. What other elements would have helped you make a better decision regarding the applicant's eligibility for a visa and why? No really, given our visa policy at that time. 21. Did your superiors ever discuss the post's NTV refusal rates in general with you? No, but my colleagues and I had an informal competition about who had the most refusals.

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED