Matthew Bender V. West Pub. Co. (ii)

Docket No. 97-7430. J. See Matthew Bender & Co. v. West Publ'g Co., *696 initialcreate BACKGROUND Supreme Court Reporter, Federal Reporter, Federal Rules DecisionsFederal Supplement, New York Supplement, See The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation see, e.g., see also The University of Chicago Manual of Legal Citation Supreme Court Reporter: per curiam Federal Reporter: Federal Supplement Federal Rules Decisions: New York Supplement: Authority from Matthew Bender. e.g.,e.g., New York Supplement (Second) In the Matter of Neftali D., New York Supplement Supreme Court on Disc, Federal Appeals on Disc, Federal Appeals Supreme Court ReporterFederal Reporter, DISCUSSION Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.,Feist,Id.Id.Id. Feist,Id.i.e., Feist Id. and Id. see also Key Publications, Inc. v. Chinatown Today Publ'g Enters., Inc.,i.e.,See Feist,de minimis Seereprinted ini.e., all complete see supra Supreme Court ReporterFederal Reporter selectio n HyperLaw's Bender's Federal Reporter, Federal Supplement, Federal Rules Decisions, New York See Tasini v. New York Times Co., Kregos v. Associated Press,

Banks Law Publishing Co. v. Lawyers' Co-Operative Publishing Co., Banks Banks See id.Banksid.orBanksBanksBanks. A i.e.,and See without i.e.,otherwise infringing use see also West Publ'g Co. v. Mead Data Central, Inc., public domain. See AXA Marine & Aviation Ins. (UK) Ltd. v. Seajet Indus. Inc., see supra Oasis Publishing Co. v. West Publishing Co.,See id.i.e.,anotherunoriginal or independentlyevery Oasis Publ'g Co., B re 1. Section 101's Definition of “Copies” copies fixed by any method from which the work can be perceived, with the aid of a machine or device. perceived, reproduced,Id. See supra i.e., See Copyright Law and Practiceid. White-Smith Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co., reprinted insee also White-Smith, See White-Smith Publ'g Co.,i.e., White-Smith Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co., reprinted in i.e.,re See, e.g., Stenograph L.L.C. v. Bossard Assocs., Inc., Stern Elecs., Inc. v. Kaufman, Sega Enters. Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc.,aff'd in part and rev'd in part, Tasini v. New York Times Co.,Tasiniinter alia,Id.isId. TasiniId. 2. Substantial Similarity Feist feature[s] Feist, see also Key Publications, Inc. v. Chinatown Today Publ'g Enters., Inc., See, e.g., Lipton v. Nature Co., Worth v. Selchow & Righter

Co., see also No “Sweat”? Copyright and Other Protection of Works of Information After Feist v. Rural Telephone,Feist,Williams v. Crichton,amicus Federal Reporter, Federal Supplement Federal Rules Decisions. Federal Reporter, Federal SupplementFederal Rules Decisions Knitwaves, Inc. v. Lollytogs Ltd., Knitwaves Federal Reporter Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. United States, Delchi Carrier SpA v. Rotorex Corp., United States v. Muniz, the readerCf. Horgan v. Macmillan, Inc., See Copyright in Collections of Facts: A Theory for the Protection of Nonfiction Literary Works,i.e., 3. Contributory Infringement See See Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Prods., Inc.,Copyright See Gershwin Publ'g Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., See ITSI T.V. Prods., Inc. v. California Auth. of Racing Fairs, amicus See Sony Corp. of Amer. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., Sony Id. see also Cable/Home Communication Corp., See Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. H.L. Green Co., SonySony.See Sony,see alsosupra see Gershwin Publ'g Corp., C West Publishing Co. v. Mead Data Central, Inc.,Id.Id. Id. see also Oasis Publ'g Co. v. West Publ'g Co.,West Publishing Co.Feist West Publishing Co. West Publishing Co West Publ'g Co., Hutchinson Telephone v. Fronteer Directory Co., see West Publ'g Co., Leon v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co., Jeweler's Circular Pub Co v. Keystone Pub Co, Feist.West Publishing Co.FeistWest Publishing Co., see United States v. Thomson Corp., CONCLUSION

West Pub. Co. v. Mead Data Central, Inc.,aff'd,cert. denied,Oasis Pub. Co. v. West Pub. Co., i.e. Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc.,Id. Feist. Feist, so long as the competing work does not feature the same selection and arrangement.Id. See e.g., Warner Bros., Inc. v. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc., Feist, Oasis Publishing Company, Inc. v. West Publishing Company, OasisId.Oasis see Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, see Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., See Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., West Publishing Co. ipse dixit,Feist,FeistWestOasisWestFeist. See West Publishing Co., Feist.West Publishing Co., West Publishing Co., See, e.g., Ringgold v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc., see also Wright v. Warner Books, Inc.,