Lecture 8 An Not At

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Lecture 8 An Not At as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,359
  • Pages: 17
6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

Lecture 8-1

Lecture 8 - PN Junction and MOS

Electrostatics (V)

Electrostatics of

Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Structure

(cont.)

October 4, 2005 Contents: 1. Overview of MOS electrostatics under bias

2. Depletion regime 3. Flatband 4. Accumulation regime 5. Threshold 6. Inversion regime Reading assignment: Howe and Sodini, Ch. 3, §§3.8-3.9 Announcements: Quiz 1: 10/13, 7:30-9:30 PM,

(lectures #1-9); open book; must have calculator.

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

Lecture 8-2

Key questions

• Is there more than one regime of operation of the MOS structure under bias? • What does ”carrier inversion” mean and what is the big deal about it? • How does the carrier inversion charge depend on the gate voltage?

Lecture 8-3

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

1. Overview of MOS electrostatics under bias VGB +-

"metal" (n+ polySi)

semiconductor (p type)

oxide contact

-tox

0

contact

x

Application of bias: • built-in potential across MOS structure increases from φB to φB + VGB • oxide forbids current flow ⇒ – J = 0 everywhere in semiconductor – need drift=-diffusion in SCR • must maintain boundary condition at Si/SiO2 interface: Eox/Es  3 How can this be accommodated simultaneously? ⇒ quasi-equilibrium situation with potential build up across MOS equal to φB + VGB

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

Important consequence of quasi-equilibrium:

⇒ Boltzmann relations apply in semiconductor [they were derived starting from Je = Jh = 0]

n(x) = ni eqφ(x)/kT p(x) = ni e−qφ(x)/kT and np = n2

i at every x

[not the case in p-n junction or BJT under bias]

Lecture 8-4

Lecture 8-5

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

2. Depletion regime For VGB > 0 gate ”attracts” electrons, ”repels” holes ⇒ depletion region widens For VGB < 0 gate ”repels” electrons, ”attracts” holes ⇒ depletion region shrinks ρ

xd(VGB)

0

0

x

-tox -qNa E Eox

Es 0 -tox

0

x

xd(VGB)

φ

VGB<0 VGB=0 VGB>0

φB+VGB φB

0

xd(VGB) x

-tox 0 log p, n

Na p n ni2 Na -tox

0

xd(VGB)

x

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

Lecture 8-6

In depletion regime, all results obtained for zero bias apply if φB → φB + VGB . For example: • depletion region thickness:

xd(VGB ) =

� � � � � � �

s 4(φB + VGB ) [ 1+ − 1] 2 Cox γ

• potential drop across semiconductor SCR: qNax2d (VGB ) VB (VGB ) = 2s • potential drop across oxide: qNaxd (VGB )tox Vox (VGB ) = ox

Lecture 8-7

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

3. Flatband At a certain negative VGB , depletion region is wiped out ⇒ Flatband ρ

ρ=0

0

0

x

-tox

E Eox=0

Es=0

0

x

0

-tox φ

VGB=0 VGB=VFB

VGB=-φB 0

0 x

-tox

log p, n

p

n -tox

0

Flatband voltage: Flatband VF B = −φB

Na

ni2 Na x

Lecture 8-8

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

4. Accumulation regime If VGB < VF B accumulation of holes at Si/SiO2 interface ρ

0

-tox

0

x

Es

x

E 0

0

-tox

Eox

φ 0

-tox

0

x

VGB-VFB

log p, n p

n -tox

0

Na

ni2 Na x

Lecture 8-9

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

5. Threshold

Back to VGB > 0. For sufficiently large VGB > 0, electrostatics change when n(0) = Na ⇒ threshold. Beyond threshold, cannot neglect contributions of electrons towards electrostatics. n(0)=Na

log p, n

Na p

n ni2 Na -tox

0

xdmax

x

Let’s compute the voltage (threshold voltage voltage)) that leads to n(0) = Na. Key assumption: use electrostatics of depletion (neglect electron concentration at threshold).

Lecture 8-10

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

2 Computation of threshold voltage. Three-step process: • First, compute potential drop in semiconductor at threshold. Start from: n(0) = nieqφ(0)/kT Solve for φ(0) at VGB = VT : kT n(0) kT Na |V = = ln ln = −φp q ni T q ni

φ(0)|VT φ

VT+φB 0

-tox

-φp

0

x

xdmax φp

Hence: VB (VT ) = −2φp

VB=-2φp

Lecture 8-11

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

• Second, compute potential drop in oxide at threshold.

Obtain xd (VT ) using relationship between VB and xd in depletion: qNax2d(VT ) = −2φp VB (VT ) = 2s Solve for xd (VT ): � � � � � � �

2s(−2φp ) xd(VT ) = xdmax = qNa Then: Vox(VT ) = Eox (VT )tox

� qNaxd(VT ) = tox = γ −2φp ox

φ

Vox VT+φB 0

-tox

-φp

0

x

xdmax φp

VB=-2φp

Lecture 8-12

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

• Finally, sum potential drops across structure. φ

Vox VT+φB 0

-tox

-φp

0

x

xdmax

VB=-2φp

φp



VT + φB = VB (VT ) + Vox (VT ) = −2φp + γ −2φp Solve for VT : �

VT = VF B − 2φp + γ −2φp Key dependencies: • If Na ↑ → VT ↑. The higher the doping level, the more voltage required to produce n(0) = Na. • If Cox ↑ (tox ↓) → VT ↓. The thinner the oxide, the less voltage dropped across it.

Lecture 8-13

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

6. Inversion

What happens for VGB > VT ?

More electrons at Si/SiO2 interface than acceptors

⇒ inversion. inversion layer

log p, n Na n

p ni2 Na -tox

0

xdmax

x

Electron concentration at Si/SiO2 interface modulated by

VGB ⇒ VGB ↑→ n(0) ↑→ |Qn| ↑ charge! field-effect control of mobile ch arge! [essence of MOSFET] Want to compute Qn vs. VGB [charge-control relation] Make sheet charge approximation: electron layer at semiconductor surface is much thinner than any other dimension in problem (tox , xd ).

Lecture 8-14

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

2 Charge-control relation Let us look at overall electrostatics:

ρ

xdmax

0

0

-tox

x -qNa

Qn E Eox

Es 0 -tox

0

xdmax

x

0

xdmax

x

φ

VGB+φB 0

-tox

log p, n Na

n

p

-tox

0

ni2 Na xdmax

x

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

Lecture 8-15

Key realization: |Qn| ∝ n(0) ∝ eqφ(0)/kT �

|QB | ∝ φ(0) Hence, as VGB ↑ and φ(0) ↑, |Qn| will change a lot, but |QB | will change very little. Several consequences: • little change in φ(0) beyond threshold

• VB does not increase much beyond VB (VT ) = −2φp (a thin sheet of electrons does not contribute much to VB ): VB (inv.)  VB (VT ) = −2φp • little change in QB beyond threshold • xd does not increase much beyond threshold: xd(inv.)  xd (VT ) =

� � � � � � �

2s(−2φp ) = xdmax qNa

Lecture 8-16

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

• All extra voltage beyond VT used to increase inversion charge Qn. Think of it as capacitor: – top plate: metal gate – bottom plate: inversion layer

Q = CV ⇒ Qn = −Cox (VGB − VT )

for VGB > VT

Existence of Qn and control ov over Qn by VGB ⇒ key ttoo MOS electronics |Qn|

Cox

VT

VGB

Lecture 8-17

6.012 - Microelectronic Devices and Circuits - Fall 2005

Key conclusions

M VGB
O ------

S (p-type) ++ ++ ++ ++ +

accumulation

flatband

VGB=VFB

VFB
VGB=0

0
VGB=VT

VGB>VT

+ ++ + + + + +++ ++ + ++ ++ ++ ++ + +++ + + + + + ++ + + ++++ ++ + ++ +++ +

-

depletion

- -- - - - -

zero bias

-

depletion

- - - - -- -

---- -- -- - --- - - - --- - - - ----- - -- - - ---- - ---- - - ----- - -

threshold

inversion

In inversion: |Qn| = Cox (VGB − VT )

for VGB > VT

Related Documents

Lecture 8 An Not At
November 2019 12
Lecture 21 An Not At
November 2019 3
Lecture 12 An Not At
November 2019 2
Lecture 13 An Not At
November 2019 4
Lecture 23 An Not At
November 2019 6
Lecture 26 An Not At
November 2019 1