Lab Standards Rev 08
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Lab Standards Rev 08 as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 487
- Pages: 2
Graded Labs — Scoring Guide
Grant HS PHYSICS
Score
Content/Process
Communication/Appearance
A+ o Exceptional work that exceeds the standards in one or more of the following areas: cre ativity, ingenuity, mastery of concepts, communication of theory or results, overall quality, (49,50) scope (application of concepts or results to situations not addressed in the lab). o Theory section thoroughly discusses important concepts depth of the treatment of major concepts throughout is sufficient to indicate mastery.
o Presentation reflects pride and care in work writing is organized, errorfree, and engaging.
o Method presentation is clear enough for a o Method presentation shows attention to key reader to replicate the experiment. issues in the experimental design. (4548) o Results are fully and clearly presented o Excellent understanding of major concepts is tables, graphs, & calculations are perfect evident throughout no errors. and logically organized. A
o Objectives are addressed convincingly in the o Overall, the report flows naturally all conclusion. Reasoning is clear throughout. parts, including introduction, contribute to Sources of error and limitation are a coherent, eloquent presentation. discussed with insight. o Some standards are at level 9, and some are at lower levels. The report is stronger than the B description of level 7 but not as strong as level 9. (4044)
C
o Theory section points the reader to important concepts addressed depth of treatment of major concepts is not sufficient to indicate mastery.
o Method presentation is acceptable, but attention to important details is missing. (3539) o Major concepts are correctly used although some errors may be present. o Objectives are addressed adequately in the results and/or conclusion, some likely sources of error are mentioned.
o Presentation is neat and readable writing is understandable although some errors in grammar or spelling, or lack of organization may be present. o Method presentation allows reader to understand how the lab was performed. o Results are presented reasonably well although there may be errors, omissions, or lack of organization. o Overall, the parts of the report are consistent and compatible.
o Some standards are at level 7 or higher, but several standards are at level 5. D (3034)
F (<30)
o Theory section does not address all of the important concepts or depth of treatment throughout is insufficient.
o Readability of report suffers due to problems in neatness, grammar, spelling, or organization.
o Method presentation shows a lack of under standing of the lab or disregard for details.
o Method presentation does not allow reader to understand how the lab was performed.
o Major concepts are incorrectly used or explained, many errors are present. Inadequate basis for evaluating depth of knowledge.
o Results are not fully presented.
o Objectives are insufficiently addressed in the results and conclusion, error discussion may be inadequate.
o Overall, the report lacks consistency parts may be missing or do not work together to present a coherent picture.
Grant HS PHYSICS
Score
Content/Process
Communication/Appearance
A+ o Exceptional work that exceeds the standards in one or more of the following areas: cre ativity, ingenuity, mastery of concepts, communication of theory or results, overall quality, (49,50) scope (application of concepts or results to situations not addressed in the lab). o Theory section thoroughly discusses important concepts depth of the treatment of major concepts throughout is sufficient to indicate mastery.
o Presentation reflects pride and care in work writing is organized, errorfree, and engaging.
o Method presentation is clear enough for a o Method presentation shows attention to key reader to replicate the experiment. issues in the experimental design. (4548) o Results are fully and clearly presented o Excellent understanding of major concepts is tables, graphs, & calculations are perfect evident throughout no errors. and logically organized. A
o Objectives are addressed convincingly in the o Overall, the report flows naturally all conclusion. Reasoning is clear throughout. parts, including introduction, contribute to Sources of error and limitation are a coherent, eloquent presentation. discussed with insight. o Some standards are at level 9, and some are at lower levels. The report is stronger than the B description of level 7 but not as strong as level 9. (4044)
C
o Theory section points the reader to important concepts addressed depth of treatment of major concepts is not sufficient to indicate mastery.
o Method presentation is acceptable, but attention to important details is missing. (3539) o Major concepts are correctly used although some errors may be present. o Objectives are addressed adequately in the results and/or conclusion, some likely sources of error are mentioned.
o Presentation is neat and readable writing is understandable although some errors in grammar or spelling, or lack of organization may be present. o Method presentation allows reader to understand how the lab was performed. o Results are presented reasonably well although there may be errors, omissions, or lack of organization. o Overall, the parts of the report are consistent and compatible.
o Some standards are at level 7 or higher, but several standards are at level 5. D (3034)
F (<30)
o Theory section does not address all of the important concepts or depth of treatment throughout is insufficient.
o Readability of report suffers due to problems in neatness, grammar, spelling, or organization.
o Method presentation shows a lack of under standing of the lab or disregard for details.
o Method presentation does not allow reader to understand how the lab was performed.
o Major concepts are incorrectly used or explained, many errors are present. Inadequate basis for evaluating depth of knowledge.
o Results are not fully presented.
o Objectives are insufficiently addressed in the results and conclusion, error discussion may be inadequate.
o Overall, the report lacks consistency parts may be missing or do not work together to present a coherent picture.
Related Documents
Lab Standards Rev 08
October 2019 24
October 08 Rev
November 2019 13
Standards
November 2019 79
Standards
November 2019 68
Standards
May 2020 27
Lab 08 Math 03
June 2020 7More Documents from "Kendra Rice"
Lab Standards Rev 08
October 2019 24
Initial Motion Assignment
October 2019 24
Lab Onegalileo
October 2019 27
The Greenhouse Effect - Reading
April 2020 7
Review Problems 2 Answer Keypdf
June 2020 14