How can we provide Point-of-Use technologies to millions of people? Testing commercial distribution strategies in Indonesia: The Aquaya Institute The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health Yayasan Dian Desa Supported by the Procter & Gamble Fund 11
Assessing Levels of Waterborne Disease
12
Assessing Water Sources and Quality
13
Summary Comparison of POU Measures Treatment
Advantages
Disadvantages
highly effective local fuel sources local production fast flow rate, long life span simple to use low per unit cost of filtered water
fuel costs
dilute bleach
local production residual protection
chlorine taste and smell
flocculationdisinfection
low up front cost residual protection, removes turbidity
SODIS
local bottles cheap
complex process higher per unit cost of filtered water many bottles, slow limited by turbidity
boiling biosand filters ceramic filters
Slow biofilm growth Heavy, difficult to move fragile, slow flow rates high up front costs
14
Assessing Cost Effectiveness water quantity 8 liters
Cost in Indonesian Rupiah boiling with dilute bleach# PUR+ kerosene* 1200 640 40
16 liters
1500
80
1280
20 liters
1650
100
1600
* Based on kerosene costs at Rp 3000.00/liter (12/05)
Based on dilute bleach costs at Rp 3000.00/bottle (treats 600 liters) + Based on PUR at a cost of Rp. 800/sachet (treats 10 liters) #
Source: CARE International Indonesia
15
Technology Selection
16
Flocculation and Disinfection
17
Developing a Marketing Scheme Yayasan Dian Desa Yogya Sartha Ventura
Primary distributor (Aquaya’s local partner) Sales, training promo support
Capital
Small and Medium Enterprises Grassroots Business Network
Information Education Communication (IEC)
CONSUMERS Sales, Promotion
Local NGO Network Government Agencies
18
Promotional Campaigns
19
Educational Campaigns
20
Program Evaluation: •Sales levels •Home water quality •Diarrheal disease levels
21