BARON ANTOINE-HENRI DE JOMINI Seminar Alpha
SCOPE OF PRESENTATION Background Key Concepts of Jomini to Continental Strategy Jomini’s Ideas and their Validation on the Nature of Warfare Contributions in Advancing Strategic Art: Its Formulation and Practice Other Significant Information that Impact the Conduct of
BACKGROUND Swiss general and military writer General in the French and later the Russian service, and One of the most celebrated writers on the Napoleonic Art of War Organized the militia of the Helvetic Republic ib 1799 After 1804 served as staff officer in the French Army
BACKGROUND
THOUGHTS ON STRATEGY "That strategy is the key to warfare; that all strategy is controlled by invariable scientific principles; and that these principles perscribe offensive action to mass forces against weaker enemy forces at some decisive point if strategy is to lead to victory." JOMINI-
Rose to high rank in Russia, becoming a celebrated Authority on Strategy His works include: Campaigns of Frederick the Great; Treatise on Grand Military Operations; the French Revolutionary Wars; and The Art of War.
Emphasized the capture of major points and the
KEY CONCEPTS
THOUGHTS ON WAR “In all military operations there is always some imperfection or weak point; but in judging operations we must apply principles with the objective in mind, and ask whether a given operation offers the best chance for victory” -JOMINI-
Jomini’sviews, like Clausewitz, strongly influenced by Napoleonic wars and Prussian military doctrine. The French revolutionized warfare and enjoyed unprecedented results. Command was decentralized, the force was largely conscripted, and power, political and military, was vested in one
KEY CONCEPTS
Strategy Tactics, & Logistics Fundamental Principles of War Simplicity Mass & Concentration Offensive action Decisive points Interior and Exterior Lines Speed and Maneuver Economy of Force Leadership Theater of Operation -JOMINI-
Acquisition of territory is secondary Observation of Napoleon's battle strategy strongly influenced Jomini's theory and became the foundation of his greatest work, 1836's Precis de l'artde la guerre, The Art of War, written to provide military instruction for the Grand Duke of Russia, the future Nicholas I.
KEY CONCEPTS Precis defined for the first time 3 main categories of military activity - strategy, tactics, and logistics - and postulated "Fundamental Principle of War" His works - oriented toward a common theme: conduct of war governed by fixed principles the most important were: 1. one should seek a line of operations capable of threatening the communications of the enemy
KEY CONCEPTS
4
M ax i " Pr Fu ms i n nd o ci a f J pl m o e en m o f t a in W l i's ar ”
1.
2.
3.
To maneuver the mass of the army, successively upon decisive points of a theater of war, and attack the enemy's lines of communication as frequently as possible while still protecting one’s own; To quickly maneuver and engage fractions of the enemy's army with the majority of one's own; To focus the attack on a "decisive point," such as weak or undefended areas in the enemy lines; and
KEY CONCEPTS
Reduce War to its Fundamental Combinations “All Strategic combinations are faulty if they do not conform to operating with the greatest possible force in a combined effort against the decisive point” -JOMINI-
Use of turning movement and hot pursuit/exploitation Leadership as a prime requirement for military success A winning general would be the combination of intellect and natural leadership. Simplicity and praised the Napoleonic strategy of a quick victory gained by quickly massing troops, and the objective of capturing capital cities as a signal of
KEY CONCEPTS Military/Government Relationship “A government should choose its ablest military commander, then leave him free to wage war according to scientific principles. Governments should not neglect their armed forces, but they must not meddle in matters that only educated and experienced officers understand” -JOMINI-
Early definitions for modern concepts such as the "theater of operation." Cared little for political niceties of war; in his view govts choose the best commander possible, then free that person to wage war as he deems appropriate. Maxim’s usefulness depends on the degree one is capable of finding this decisive point.
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE Jomini's25 translated works, influenced military leaders in both Europe and North America for much of the 19th century. Sought to codify the basic tenets of modern war in terms of a small number of timeless principles. Stressed the following: advantages of fighting on interior lines; maintaining secure communications while seeking to
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE Stressed the following: His work suggested that the chaos and uncertainty of war could be mastered by means of a positivistic social science, and the precise mental habits and systematic approach of the engineer and the industrial manager could find a use on the battlefield. His ideas permeated the curriculum of the USMA in the antebellum era, and
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE No modern army could dispense the enduring Principles of War for the conduct of operations and the education of officers. In this respect, Jomini remains among the most influential of modern military theorists. However, recent scholars have viewed Jominias a chronicler of pre-modern
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE As a military strategist, often compared with Prussian contemporary Karl Marie von Clausewitz (1780-1831), and his 1833 treatise Vom Kriege (On War). Unlike Clausewitz, Jominiwas vague on the importance of genius. Like Clausewitz, however, his focus remained on the Napoleonic "great battle" rather than the more modern war of multiple armed encounters.
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE In his time, Jomini had a much greater impact on doctrine than Clausewitzthe American Civil War strategies employed by both sides were heavily influenced by Jominiantheory. Alfred Thayer Mahan uses Jomini'sconcept of land warfare to build his conception of naval strategy. Modern operational art owes much to Jomini'stactical and operational thinking. Jomini, a practical-minded
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE JOMINI vs CLAUSEWITZ SIMILARITIES
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE JOMINI vs CLAUSEWITZ DIFFERENCES
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE JOMINI vs CLAUSEWITZ DIFFERENCES
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE JOMINI vs CLAUSEWITZ DIFFERENCES
VALIDATION OF JOMINI’S IDEAS ON THE NATURE OF WARFARE In general, most of what Jominihad contributed that was of real value were absorbed and written in practical doctrine while Clausewitz‘s, have not. Given the brilliance and subtlety of Clausewitz's concepts, it is hard to see them as "conventional wisdom." Jomini is important in a purely historical sense but in
CONTRIBUTIONS IN ADVANCING STRATEGIC ART Antoine-Henri Jominiwas credited with the title of founder of modern strategy, though uncertain in the point of view of some modern military analysts. However, it cannot be denied that he defined the Principle of War whose concepts have survived up to this day and relate the three (3) main categories of military activity - strategy, tactics, and logistics – in warfare.
CONTRIBUTIONS IN ADVANCING STRATEGIC ART Although the U.S. Army presents itself as a Clausewitzian organization, at the tactical and operational levels however, it remains more firmly rooted in the ideals of Jomini. Jomini’s scientific approach that espouses the collective genius of good staff work and the military decision-making process (MDMP) rather than the singular genius of mil comdrembraced by Clausewitz;
CONTRIBUTIONS IN ADVANCING STRATEGIC ART Advocacy on the “offensivedefensive”, analogous to the Army’s mobile defense. Though Clausewitz also advocate offensive strategy, he was not to the same refinement as Jomini. Clausewitz relied more on maximum exertion of forces while Jomini required focus of strength at the decisive point.
US reliance on decisive points and the scientific application of military theory to provide the commander with solutions to problems in war Espousal of Lines of Operation.
CONTRIBUTIONS IN ADVANCING STRATEGIC ART MDMP’s systemic approach to problem solving relies on simple rules governing the movement of forces, synchronization of their effects, and the discerned application of maximum power at decisive points on the battlefield. (Clarity and optimism that war can be controlled and the studious theoretician can master the application of violence)
Recent operations in Afghanistan demonstrate the Army’s desire to conform to a
OTHER SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION THAT IMPACT THE CONDUCT OF French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars revolutionized military strategy. Their impact was still felt in the American Civil War and the early phases of World War I. With the advent of cheap small arms and rise of the drafted citizen soldier, armies grew rapidly in size to become massed formations. Necessitated dividing the army into divisions and later into corps. Along with divisions came divisional artillery; light-
OTHER SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION THAT IMPACT THE CONDUCT OF Napoleon I of France and the "strategy of annihilation" to achieve decision in battle, with the sole aim of destroying his opponent, usually achieving success through superior maneuver. (As ruler and general he dealt with the grand strategy as well as the operational strategy, making use of political and economic measures.)
In the Industrial Age, the evolution of military strategy continued in the American Civil War (1861-65). The practice of strategy was advanced by
OTHER SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION THAT IMPACT THE CONDUCT OF However, the adherence to the Napoleonic principles in the face of technological advances such as the long-range infantry rifle led to disastrous consequences. Time and space in war also changed. Railroads enabled swift movement of large forces but the maneuvering was constrained to narrow, vulnerable corridors. Steam power and ironclads changed transport and combat at sea.
In the 100 years, which passed between the end of the Napoleonic wars and the next
OTHER SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION THAT IMPACT THE CONDUCT OF A major lesson from Napoleonic Wars was the importance of the decisive battle, but the generals of World War I were unable to achieve it. Indecisive fighting led to prolonged static warfare. Jomini’sdefinition of strategy as the “art of making war upon the map,” seemed inadequate. The armies were so large it was impossible for tactics alone to crush the enemy and achieve strategic aims. (Waterloo 140,000 men faced each other, by 1914 a combined total of 3.3
OTHER SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION THAT IMPACT THE CONDUCT OF The aftermath of World War I helped them understand the impact of expanded battlefield, industrialization, and mass armies. Old framework of strategy and tactics was inadequate for the new changes. This was the genesis of operational art in the industrial age and the foundation of new strategies
OTHER SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION THAT IMPACT THE CONDUCT OF Nevertheless, the following are principles of war that have survived and continued until the 21st Century that has bearing on Jominianthoughts, theories, and practices: Objective and Offensive (taking the initiative), Unity of Command / Unity of Effort, focus on Mass and Concentration, Economy of Force / Economy of Effort, Maneuver, Simplicity (Clarity), Surprise, and
CONCLUSION In general, Jomini’sworks on the Art of War has continued even to the modern age though development in military strategy due to the evolving changes in warfare methodologies, the advent of sea and air power, technological advancements, among others have provided corresponding variations in strategy. Nevertheless, war principles such as offense, mass and concentration, economy of
CONCLUSION Jomini like Clauswitz, took no credit for uniqueness; the “truths” of his view of war had already been demonstrated by the great Commanders. He was “simply” the “first” to systematize and codify what they had done. Much of what Jomini wrote has been passé by technological advances, but his analytical methodology and his thoughts on the strategic and policy level still have applicability. There is no such thing as the
End of Presentation Good day!