Interactions Of Motion, Gravity, And Its Effects On Mass, Theory

Interactions of motion, gravity, and its effects on mass theory 1. Motion 2. Space 3. Gravity 4. Mass As I examine an object traveling through space, the object that is traveling is occupying a given space, it’s volume. No matter what the mass is of the object the amount of space is what’s important if the object is to pass through gravitational fields as it travels. I mean does gravity from a star pull more strongly on more dense objects? Gravity is 33 feet per second squared. Its effect is constant. So why is it we weigh more on dense objects? I mean if the acceleration is constant? A paradox. Density effects gravity. But gravity is unaffected. Think about it. Why? I see that in motion gravity is effecting an object at a specific rate of acceleration but, at rest, gravity multiplies. I have a theory on gravity. To travel in space an object needs more than one gravitational force at work. The earth has gravity. The moon. The sun. all the planets and their moons. All the interactions of gravity allow us to travel through space. We are in a constant state of motion, thank God, otherwise we would all be destroyed. Motion. The second factor. The motion of an object is very much important. We could not measure motion with a lone object in space for their would not be any relative point in which to refer that motion to. Two objects are necessary to measure motion in space. So if the object to travel in space was to travel from point a to point b it would have to consider two motions and two gravitational fields. The object would need to break the gravity field ( point a ) to enter the gravity field (point b). if these two fields overlapped what does the object do? Not much I would say. But when if we knew a way to play one field off of the other in such a way as to effect the traveling object. When if we had a way to create motion through the interaction of gravitational fields. Here at rest between two gravity fields. That one traveling object is occupying space in two gravitational fields. Its mass not a factor as it is balanced. It is in my opinion occupying space in two places. It is existing in two places, a gray area of nature, it is being effected by two forces which overlap. The forces are balanced so is there really a force at work. No, not unless there is motion. So if this object is to move slightly towards one gravity say point a. what is the effect. Point a gravity just got a slight bit stronger in its attraction and point b gravity just got weaker in its effect. Two effects one object at the same time. The object just moved twice at the same time. Motion squared. As it moved two gravities were effected. And energy was used for that movement. Energy. Motion and energy. What about mass? Mass mattered to the motion at the time it happened to be moving but at rest it is not the mass at all. It is the volume. How can this be? E=MC squared. Mass is important right? For an atom and releasing its energy. But I am not interested in releasing energy I am interested in controlling energy. This object is suspended between forces and to control it I need to know its relationship. Motion squared and energy. Interesting. But what I see is duality. Two forces overlapping. Motion between these forces by a single object is in fact two motions. An object with dimensions. Volume. Three of the known dimensions. Time the fourth dimension needs to be accounted for. The amount of time the motion took. And the motion which the rate at which the motion occurred. Say for example: feet per sec. but as I stated two motions occurred so motion squared. This is confusing even to me but this overlapping condition and two existences explain why the fabric of space exists. The volume multiplied by time multiplied by the motion squared = v + one extra dimension of space divided by mass. Mass has returned. What does it mean? in my opinion this extra dimension of space is the overlapping of the objects space in

two fields of gravity. Sounds very much like a paradox. Two forces of gravity overlapping and two dimensions of space overlapping. Let me explain. I think gravity is in fact a constant. In motion gravity is 33 feet per second squared. At rest it is effected by mass. Gravity at rest or in motion. I want to control gravity so I speak only of the motion type of gravity. But this space concept is explained as well as I can like this: 3 dimensions. Length, width, height. What is the fourth dimension of space? Lets examine a two dimensional concept. Lets take the (2) two dimensional objects that share a common goal. Point a point b point c point d. point a. b. c. are three dimensional as is point b. c.d. as is point a. b. d. With the point d as a shared dimension of space, the “motion” dimension of “feet” (per second squared.). Moving away from one source of gravity and moving towards another source of gravity. Two motions in one. Two gravitational forces. Duality. Yes, nature is never wrong about duality. So why divide by mass? A tough one to ponder. Mass is directly related to gravity. The more mass, the greater the gravity. What defines mass. Difficult to define. Is a one kilogram object on earth still a one kilogram object on the moon? The gravity is different. So what defines it? The reference point we are relating it to. So when I say mass is unimportant, it is unimportant until it is referenced. This is the same argument I believe is valid in discussion of motion. So why divide the four dimensions of volume (Let’s say F4) by mass? Density = mass/volume. Let’s redefine density. A 3 cubic foot mass traveling 5 feet per sec weighing 9 lbs. 9/3 = a density of 3. Under d=m/ v but let’s use F4. A 3 cubic mass of 9lbs moving 5 feet per sec. 9/ 75 = a density of 3/25. In reality we see 3 as the density so how do we obtain a 3/25 density. We need to bend a few rules. With motion. We need I what I believe is a wobble between the two gravitational fields. Kind of like an atom. It vibrates. You can set a watch by the vibration it is so predictable. Lol. So how do we obtain such a wobble. We build it. Using two magnetic fields. Wobbling one inside the other. Simple. We use a mass and motion to create the wobble and I believe the result will be, dare I say it, that 3/25 density instead of a 3 density. Almost an antigravity effect.