Ethics Wwii Prelim Plan

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Ethics Wwii Prelim Plan as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 304
  • Pages: 1
War Question: During the second world war the British developed the policy of mass bombing with the object of completely demolishing German cities thereby destroying public morale and hastening the end of the war. How might a Utilitarian and Kantian respond to this policy? Intro - Kant and Util. Vastly different - generalise issue - specify: summary of situation, Britain’s motives. Kant stance, util more complex Main body - util: GHP complexity: death tolls, Hitler’s potential, Trenchard quote act (classical – consequences of particular act) – states we always pursue happiness + shun pain (psychological hedonism). rule (indirect) util. (consequences of following rule). Two-level util. – less strict, from experience jeremy bentham (1748-1832) – util. Founder. Said all pleasures same: felicific calculus – intensity, duration, (un)certainty, remoteness, fecundity, purity. Eg. Rich man wins money, hed. Calc. Says give to charity. Js mill – high/low pleasures(mind/body) common sense approach, not religiously biased, equity important. Demanding (eg. Ice cream). Using humans as means problem? – cause util likely support bombs kantian – categorical imperative (groundwork). Act as if maxim of action become through will universal law. Law making members of a kingdom of ends. Motives: Britain’s motives. Util support, not with hindsight. Kant criticise not considering other options. Kant: all suffer or none, never treat innocents as means to an end. Maxims allows kantian work out for themselves what is moral. Moral acts based on unconditional principles. Simplistic model of causality (only looking at act’s intentions), doesn’t consider emotions, maxims impoverished technique? Unconditinoally wrong acts cause perfect duties. Maxim willed that breaches perfect duties = “contradiction in conception” Inclinations cannot determine moral duty. Karl Marx (1818-83) – communist manifesto, equity bridges util + kant (neo-kantian and GHP). Conclude: kant against. Util for but not with hindsight. Bombing roads, railways, bridges much more effective in Nazi downfall.

Related Documents

Ethics Wwii Prelim Plan
November 2019 15
Ethics Wwii Prelim Answer
November 2019 8
Wwii
November 2019 24
Prelim
June 2020 25
Prelim)
December 2019 47
Ethics
November 2019 43