Espec

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Espec as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 901
  • Pages: 108
E Spec E Spec The 1NC Shell Action Overview AT: 2ac Clarification AT: It’s this actor AT: Cross X Checks AT: Normal Means AT: Optimal Means

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

at : offense AT: ? OverSpecification AT: Agent CPs bad AT: Your CP d/n spec AT: c/i only our case is T AT: No in round abuse AT: shit checks abuse

8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21A

Elmore Key to education Noble Lie ? Centralization Forward Mapping d/n solve Street level enforcement will fail Alienates Enforcement Can’t form coalitions

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CLS Biz The Biz Entrenches Hierarchy Crap representatives for court Trashing Alternative

29-33 34 35 36

Deterrence Theory Signal Co-Opeted No perception Sends different signals Gen. Deterrence 1NC Gen. Det. 1nc card extension Gen. Deterrence 2NC cards Specific Deterrence fails

37 38 39 40 41 42-44 45

Federal Courts Flooding Turn Civil rights trade off F. Courts don’t hear cases! F. courts are racist AT: Congress will solve these problems AT: Mo’ judges will solve

46-47 48 49 50 51 52

Law

* 53 54

Prisons 1NC Card thang AT: Incapacitation Recidivism, Overcrowding Prison Rape Happens Prison Rape impacts Prison Rape Narrative Corrections Language AT: plan d/n use prisons Foucault says prisons fail

*

Normal Means NM = Delegation NM = litigation NM = unfunded mandates NM = no perception NM can be repealed! NM = moralistic NM = racist NM = riders Crim Law NM = fines n’ prison

* Federal Criminal Violates Constitution Local Redundancy inevitable

Tort Law

55-56 57-58 59-60 61-62 63-66 67-69 70-71 72 72A-C

*

Tort Deterrence Fails Tort Deterrence Straight Turn fun! Tort Det. - Ignorance Tort Det. - Incompetence Tort Det. - Threat Discounting Tort Det. - High Stakes Tort Det. - Small Penalty

73 74-75 76 77 78 79 80

Tort sends no signal Tort is mad slow AT: Torts empirically solve Alternate Deterrents Now Can’t Solve big companies Plaintiffs exaggerate AT: Insurance Premiums AT: Insurance Non-renewal Threats AT: Insurance inspections AT: Insurance experience ratings

81 82 83 84-85 86 87 88 89 90 91

Tort compensation fails

92-94

Can’t solve group rights Class Action suits bad

95 96

AT: Cost Internalization

97

*

Spec. thangz

Enviro Racism Litigation d/n solve Enviro Torts don’t help poor communities NM for enviro laws d/n exist

* 98 99 100

Employment Regulations Fail 101-102 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wutsup widdis file? They need to spec their E’s. General Deterrence is this law scares everyone from doing illegal x, s p e c d e t. Is this law scares off repeat offenders by punishing them so so much they wont do it again. I ncapacitation is keeping criminals out of society, the insurance cards are for the liability insurance debate cls biz is generic reasons its bad if you also don’t solve and reasons why courts enf. Sucks -chuk 2.16.02, 1 month from stone cold.

E Spec E Spec The 1NC Shell Action Overview

1 2

AT: 2ac Clarification AT: It’s this actor AT: Cross X Checks AT: Normal Means AT: Optimal Means

3 4 5 6 7

at : offense AT: ? OverSpecification AT: Agent CPs bad AT: Your CP d/n spec AT: c/i only our case is T AT: No in round abuse AT: shit checks abuse

8 9 10 11 12 13

Normal Means NM = Delegation NM = litigation NM = unfunded mandates NM = no perception NM can be repealed! NM = moralistic NM = racist NM = riders Crim Law NM = fines n’ prison

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21A

Elmore Key to education Noble Lie ? Centralization Forward Mapping d/n solve Street level enforcement will fail Alienates Enforcement Can’t form coalitions

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CLS Biz The Biz Entrenches Hierarchy Crap representatives for court Trashing Alternative

29-33 34 35 36

Deterrence Theory Signal Co-Opeted No perception Sends different signals Gen. Deterrence 1NC Gen. Det. 1nc card extension Gen. Deterrence 2NC cards Specific Deterrence fails

37 38 39 40 41 42-44 45

Federal Courts Flooding Turn Civil rights trade off F. Courts don’t hear cases! F. courts are racist AT: Congress will solve these problems AT: Mo’ judges will solve

*

Federal

46-47 48 49 50 51 52

Criminal Law

Violates Constitution Local Redundancy inevitable

* 53 54

Prisons 1NC Card thang AT: Incapacitation Recidivism, Overcrowding Prison Rape Happens Prison Rape impacts Prison Rape Narrative Corrections Language AT: plan d/n use prisons Foucault says prisons fail

*

Tort Law

Tort Deterrence Fails Tort Deterrence Straight Turn fun! Tort Det. - Ignorance Tort Det. - Incompetence Tort Det. - Threat Discounting

55-56 57-58 59-60 61-62 63-66 67-69 70-71 72 72A-C

* 73 74-75 76 77 78

Tort Det. - High Stakes Tort Det. - Small Penalty

79 80

Tort sends no signal Tort is mad slow AT: Torts empirically solve Alternate Deterrents Now Can’t Solve big companies Plaintiffs exaggerate

81 82 83 84-85 86 87

AT: Insurance Premiums AT: Insurance Non-renewal Threats AT: Insurance inspections AT: Insurance experience ratings

88 89 90 91

Tort compensation fails

92-94

Can’t solve group rights Class Action suits bad

95 96

AT: Cost Internalization

97

*

Spec. thangz

*

Enviro Racism Litigation d/n solve 98 Enviro Torts don’t help poor communities 99 NM for enviro laws d/n exist 100 Employment Regulations Fail

101-102

Related Documents