Eos S1b315051032

  • Uploaded by: Adrian Rizki Chandra
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Eos S1b315051032 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 467
  • Pages: 10
Economics of Strategy Adrian Rizki Chandra

BACKGROUND Indonesian Shoes Industry • Open unemployment plus under-employment has reached 40%. • 80% of the unemployed workers’ education are under SLTP.

• Foreign principal runs material procurement, production process, and distribution process. • Foreign principal is a pure capitalist. They abandon

Indonesia in searching for cheaper production cost.

BACKGROUND Indonesian Shoes Industry Markets PERFECTLY COMPETITIVE: • Fragmented Industry • Homogenous Product

Firms are price takers

• Perfect Information • Equal Access to Inputs & Technologies ZERO ECONOMICS PROFIT Profit Maximizing by optimizing firms’ output and Average Cost Indonesia’s Average Cost > Foreign’s Average Cost

INA PRODUCTION COST Ind AC > For AC

• Economies of Scale is not effective – Short-run economies of scale  Labor-Intensive (Hi VC & Lo FC)  spreading FC – Product-level economies of scale not achieved  failed to buy

large quantity of material  import to avoid bad quality and high cost



Economic Rent does not take place – Uneducated labor, Low employee’s benefit & High Turnover  need years of experience to be an extraordinary input

INA PRODUCTION COST Ind AC > For AC

P

P MC

MC AC

AC AVC

AVC

Foreign

Indonesia Q

Q

NIKE’S PRODUCTION CHAIN Network Structure

Shoes Factory

Material

Sewing

Nike Corporation

Assembly

Branding & Marketing

• Nike is the firm’s only buyer • The factory has dedicated assets toward Nike

NIKE’S PRODUCTION CHAIN The Firm’s Dependency

• The Firm become dependence toward Nike as the sole customer – Quasi-Rent very high since the firm has no other customer – Holdup Problem occurring due to Relationship-Specific

Investments – Imbalance contract that liberates Nike in calling off the deal

WHAT TO DO?

The Firm’s New Strategy • Education – Better education promotes better learning curves and ability to maneuvering new technology – Better human capital, technology progress, & technological

knowledge  learning economies – Use country’s extraordinary input  Indonesia as a agricultural country  comparative advantage

• Employee’s Benefit – Better Employee’s Benefit & Better Jamsostek Policy  promotes the possibility of extraordinary input occurring

WHAT TO DO?

The Firm’s New Strategy • Product Innovation & Market Innovation – Better concern on R&D endorse innovation on optimizing asset  economies of scope (sandals, bags, accessories)

• Better Contract, Quasi-Rent, & Holdup Problem Strategy – Mutual Contract with call-off restriction – Have more than one vendor  to reduce Quasi-Rent of each contact

• Promote Economies of Scale, Economies of Scope, & Learning Economies

WHAT TO DO?

The Firm’s New Strategy • Earns ‘good profit’ that comes from Value Creation Activities – Higher Benefit  Product Innovation & Market Innovation – Lower Cost  Economies of Scale, Economies of Scope, Learning Economies Market Economy

COMPANY PROFIT

Benefit Position Relative to Competitor Value Creation Cost Position Relative to Competitor

Related Documents

Eos S1b315051032
June 2020 7
Eos Agreement
June 2020 6
Eos 4000d.pdf
June 2020 5
Eos Vw
December 2019 60
Eos Kiss Digital
August 2019 15

More Documents from ""