Ejohnson F18 Engh 890 Sri
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Ejohnson F18 Engh 890 Sri as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 637
- Pages: 2
Course Evaluation Reporting Courses for: Erika T. Johnson
CRN
Term
College
2018 FALL
12496
Campus
Sort By 2
Department
UC
Schedule Code Instr Method
Sort By 1
Only Courses with Surveys Only Courses without Surveys Show Comparative Averages Show Detail Comparative Stats Show Number Response Counts
Section Status
Output
500
Detail
Show Group Summary Only Include 95% Confidence Interval Include Min / Max / Median Display Question Code Hide Text Entry / Comments
Excel
Records
Search
If nothing is listed below, hit the search button for data to populate. If you change any settings with the above checkboxes, please hit the search button to save the changes. Click on the Professor name to see all Courses for that particular Professor. Click on the number under "Evaluations Taken" to see detail information for that particular Course.
Term
Coll Dept Sch Inst Camp Stat
2018 FALL UC BCM HY LEC
M
A
Evals Total % Reporting Disabled Taken Enroll Comp ENGH 0890 008 12496 Lit and Comp Across Univ Erika T. Johnson 7 14 50 Total: 7 14 50% Records: 1 Time: 0.04 Seconds Course
CRN
Description
Professor
Std Total Strongly Agree Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Disagree(%) Avg Dev 4.14 1.04 21 52 19 19 10 0
Student Experiences Description
Completed course work. Prepared for class. Contact Instructor when needing help.
Total
Strongly Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Std Agree Disagree(%) Avg Dev
7
43
14
43
4.00 0.93
7
43
7
71
29
29
3.86 1.25
14
14
4.57 0.73
Std Total Strongly Agree Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Disagree(%) Avg Dev 4.85 0.35 34 85 15 0 0 0
Overall Eval Description
Total
Strongly Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Std Agree Disagree(%) Avg Dev
Learned more.
7
86
14
4.86 0.35
Instructor helped. Subject used outside class. Class challenged to think in new ways. I developed essential skills.
7
86
14
4.86 0.35
7
100
5.00 0.00
7
71
29
4.71 0.45
6
83
17
4.83 0.37
Std Total Strongly Agree Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Disagree(%) Avg Dev 4.47 0.67 49 55 39 4 2 0
Instructor Evaluation Description
Total
Strongly Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Std Agree Disagree(%) Avg Dev
Instructor was prepared.
7
71
29
4.71 0.45
Instructor was respectful. Instructor provided feedback. Instructor was available.
7
43
29
14
14
4.00 1.07
7
57
43
4.57 0.49
7
86
14
4.86 0.35
Instructor had clear expectations. Instructor was enthusiastic. Instructor was clear on how to succeed.
7
29
57
14
4.14 0.64
7
57
43
4.57 0.49
7
43
57
4.43 0.49 Total 0
Open ended questions Description
what help learning most.
I was able to find new ways to do papers. The modules Visual presentations and going through everything in class What helped me most was how the instructor really cared about our learning and cared about me succeeding. I could see a difference from her compared to other instructors I had this past semester writng papers
Suggestions for improvement.
I don't have any suggestions. If anything, sometimes she would say an assignment is due a certain date but canvas is saying something else. A bit more clarification would be best. More classmates None make grading easier the only suggestion that I have is probably take more time and and give more classroom work on module four.
Teaching Approach
The following questions are not used for retention, tenure and promotion decisions. They are used for the university to better understand the current level of student engagement in other areas. Description
Std Total Yes(%) No(%) Not Applicable(%) Avg Dev 2.52 0.66 21 62 29 10 Yes(%) No(%) Total
Not Std Applicable(%) Avg Dev
Work collaboratively.
7
100
3.00 0.00
Connect to community. Participate in events.
7
57
29
14 2.43 0.73
7
29
57
14 2.14 0.64
Copyright © 19982019 Runner Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/5/2019 15:56
CRN
Term
College
2018 FALL
12496
Campus
Sort By 2
Department
UC
Schedule Code Instr Method
Sort By 1
Only Courses with Surveys Only Courses without Surveys Show Comparative Averages Show Detail Comparative Stats Show Number Response Counts
Section Status
Output
500
Detail
Show Group Summary Only Include 95% Confidence Interval Include Min / Max / Median Display Question Code Hide Text Entry / Comments
Excel
Records
Search
If nothing is listed below, hit the search button for data to populate. If you change any settings with the above checkboxes, please hit the search button to save the changes. Click on the Professor name to see all Courses for that particular Professor. Click on the number under "Evaluations Taken" to see detail information for that particular Course.
Term
Coll Dept Sch Inst Camp Stat
2018 FALL UC BCM HY LEC
M
A
Evals Total % Reporting Disabled Taken Enroll Comp ENGH 0890 008 12496 Lit and Comp Across Univ Erika T. Johnson 7 14 50 Total: 7 14 50% Records: 1 Time: 0.04 Seconds Course
CRN
Description
Professor
Std Total Strongly Agree Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Disagree(%) Avg Dev 4.14 1.04 21 52 19 19 10 0
Student Experiences Description
Completed course work. Prepared for class. Contact Instructor when needing help.
Total
Strongly Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Std Agree Disagree(%) Avg Dev
7
43
14
43
4.00 0.93
7
43
7
71
29
29
3.86 1.25
14
14
4.57 0.73
Std Total Strongly Agree Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Disagree(%) Avg Dev 4.85 0.35 34 85 15 0 0 0
Overall Eval Description
Total
Strongly Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Std Agree Disagree(%) Avg Dev
Learned more.
7
86
14
4.86 0.35
Instructor helped. Subject used outside class. Class challenged to think in new ways. I developed essential skills.
7
86
14
4.86 0.35
7
100
5.00 0.00
7
71
29
4.71 0.45
6
83
17
4.83 0.37
Std Total Strongly Agree Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Disagree(%) Avg Dev 4.47 0.67 49 55 39 4 2 0
Instructor Evaluation Description
Total
Strongly Agree(%) Neutral(%) Disagree(%) Strongly Std Agree Disagree(%) Avg Dev
Instructor was prepared.
7
71
29
4.71 0.45
Instructor was respectful. Instructor provided feedback. Instructor was available.
7
43
29
14
14
4.00 1.07
7
57
43
4.57 0.49
7
86
14
4.86 0.35
Instructor had clear expectations. Instructor was enthusiastic. Instructor was clear on how to succeed.
7
29
57
14
4.14 0.64
7
57
43
4.57 0.49
7
43
57
4.43 0.49 Total 0
Open ended questions Description
what help learning most.
I was able to find new ways to do papers. The modules Visual presentations and going through everything in class What helped me most was how the instructor really cared about our learning and cared about me succeeding. I could see a difference from her compared to other instructors I had this past semester writng papers
Suggestions for improvement.
I don't have any suggestions. If anything, sometimes she would say an assignment is due a certain date but canvas is saying something else. A bit more clarification would be best. More classmates None make grading easier the only suggestion that I have is probably take more time and and give more classroom work on module four.
Teaching Approach
The following questions are not used for retention, tenure and promotion decisions. They are used for the university to better understand the current level of student engagement in other areas. Description
Std Total Yes(%) No(%) Not Applicable(%) Avg Dev 2.52 0.66 21 62 29 10 Yes(%) No(%) Total
Not Std Applicable(%) Avg Dev
Work collaboratively.
7
100
3.00 0.00
Connect to community. Participate in events.
7
57
29
14 2.43 0.73
7
29
57
14 2.14 0.64
Copyright © 19982019 Runner Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/5/2019 15:56
Related Documents
Ejohnson F18 Engh 890 Sri
November 2019 2
F18
November 2019 9
890 Photobrochure
November 2019 5
890 97453
May 2020 3
