Design And Development Controlled Release Micro Spheres Of Some Selected Anti-retroviral Drugs

  • Uploaded by: agnimitra123
  • 0
  • 0
  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Design And Development Controlled Release Micro Spheres Of Some Selected Anti-retroviral Drugs as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 736
  • Pages: 11
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROLLED RELEASE MICROSPHERES OF SOME SELECTED ANTI-RETROVIRAL DRUGS

BY Agnimitra Dinda University Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar

1

AIDS :

INTRODUCTION :

Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome Affected nearly 45 million people of in the world Characterized by : Various virus Replication CD4 lymphocyte depletion Immunodeficiency Therapy : HIV nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors : Lamivudine , Abacavir,Didanocin Non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors : Navirapine, Delavaridine HIV protease inhibitors : Saquinaqvir, Indinavir, Ritonavir, Lopinavir, Nelfenavir Fusion inhibitors : Fuzeon

2

Regimen : Viral replication effectively reverse CD4 cell depletion reduce morbidity & mortality

 Single dose form  Combination therapy Combination Therapy : Lamivudine and Stavudine  Lamivudine and Zidovudine  Lamivudin , Stavudine & Navirapin  Lamivudine , Zidovudine & Nevirapine Vital combination (World wide) : Combination of

 Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors Lamivudine and abacavir protease inhibitors Ritonavir and Lopinavir 3

DRUG PROFILE: MOA Abacavir :  prevent the conversion of viral RNA into proviral DNA before the entry in to host cell.

Ritonavir and Lopinavir :  Peptidomimetic HIV protease inhibitors  bind reversibly to active site of HIV protease  preventing the polypeptide synthesis and mutation.

Pharmacokinetic :  Half life nearly 1-5 hours  Bioavailability (50-60%)

Oral doses regimen : 

200mg twice a day 4

Back Ground of The Invention:

 Reduce the frequency of administration  To improve patient compliance  Increase bioavailability  So sustained or controlled release formulations of above drugs are desirable  Conventional oral dosage form available  Controlled release formulation absent  So controlled release formulation essentials

Controlled release drug delivery: Advantages:  Increase incidence and / or intensity of adverse effect and toxicity  Better drug utilization  More uniform drug utilization  More uniform blood circulation  Improve patient complience  Decrease dosing frequency more consistence and prolong therapeutic effect  A greater selectivity of pharmacological activity  Targeting the drug to a specific organ and tissue  Control the rate of delivery to the target tissue

5

AIM & OBJECTIVE: To reduce dose To reduce the frequency of administration To improve patient complience To increase biological Half life To increase bioavailability To reduce the toxicity To increase loading and entrapment efficiency To study influence of formulations factors 6

PLAN OF WORK: Steps develops :  Preformulation Study  Physiocochemical characterization of drug  Solubility study of the drug in different physiological pH condition  Selection of dissolution medium  Drug-Excipient compatibility study  Design and Formulation of dosage forms  Preparation of Standard Curve  Preparation of dosage forms  Evaluation of dosage forms  % of yield calculation  Micromeritic properties  Particle size distribution  Flow properties  Mean particle size determination 7

PLAN OF WORK: Determination of % Drug entrapment efficiency SEM study FTIR study DSC study X-RD study In-vitro dissolution rate studies Dissolution rate kinetics studies Selection of final formulation Stability study In-Vivo Evaluation In-Vitro and In-Vivo Correlation

Content

&

8

PROPOSED OUT COME:  The purpose formulation increase bioavailability, reduce the dose and reduce dosing frequency.  Formulation reduces side effect and toxicity.  It may provide prolong action with less toxicity and can be possible for marketed preparation .

9

REFERENCES: 1.    Masur, H..Michelis., M.A. Greene., J.B. Onorate, et.al, An out break community acquired pneumo cystis carinii pneumonia : initial manifestation of cellular immuno dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med., 1981,305: 1431-1438. 2.    Ho, D.D., A.U., Perelson, A.S., Chen., W., Leonard,J.M., and Markowitz, M. Rapid turn over of plasma vorions and CD4 lymphocytes in HIV infection. Nature, 1995, 373: 123-126. 3.     Pereson, A.S., Neumann, A.V., Markowitz, M., Leonard, J.M., and Ho, D.D. HIV-1 dynamic in vivo: virion clearance rate, infected cell life span, and viral generation time. Science, 1996,271, 1582-1586. 4. Pallela, F.J. Jr., Delaney, K.M., Moorman, A.C, Loveless, M.O., Fuhrer, J., Satten, G.A., Aschman. Decline morbidity and mortality among patient with advance immuno deficiendy virus infection. HIV out patient study infection, N. Engl. J. Med.,1998,338: 853-860. 5.       CIMS® India: Aprl-July, 2007, Page 427-430. 6.     Gao, W.Y., Agbaria, R., Drescoll, J.S., and Mitsuya, H. Divergent anti human deficiency virus activity and anabolic phosphorylation of 2’, 3’deoxynucleoside analogs in resting and activated human cells. J. Bio. Chem. 1994, 269: 12633-12638. 7.       S. Haznedar, B. Dortune, “ Preparation and In-vitro Evaluation of Eudragit microspheres containing acetazolamide”, International Journal of 10 Pharmaceutics, 269(2004)131-140. 8.      Sanju Dinwan, Anil Kumar Singla and Vivek Ranjan Sinha, “Evaluation of

11

Related Documents


More Documents from "rathneshkumar"