Deer Park Sc-lp 0709

Study Circles Post-Survey Data: H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT Y : D E E R P A R K - C H A N G E S IN KN O WLE D G E O F P O V E R T Y B E F O R E A N D N O W/ A F T E R S T UD Y C IR C LE S F R O M P O S T S UR V E Y S 2 .0 9 3.5

3.0

3.07

3.07

3.22

3.07

2.80

2.88

2.85

1. 9 0

1. 8 0

2.68

2.5

2.24 2.0

2.33

2.28

2.07

1. 7 8

1. 8 3

Deer Park

1. 5

B EF OR E a v e r a ge r a t i ng

1. 0

0.5

N OW/ A F TER a v e r a g e r a t i ng

0.0

P ossi bl e

D i f f er ent

R easons i t i s

H ow pover t y

St r a t e g i e s t o

I ndi vi dual

C o mmu n i t y

P ol i ci es t hat

causes of

ki nds of

di f f i cul t t o

a f f e c t s my

r educe

act i ons t o

act i ons t o

woul d r educe

pover t y

pover t y

get out of

c o mmu n i t y

pover t y

r educe

r educe

pover t y

pover t y

pover t y

pover t y Scale of 1 = Almost n ot hin g t o 4 = A gr eat deal

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: DEER P ARK STUDY CIRCLE P OSTSURVEY INFORM ATION 2.09

100.0%

8 3 .7 %

90.0% 80.0% 70.0%

5 3 .5 %

60.0%

4 4 .2 %

50.0%

3 2 .6 %

40.0%

2 3 .3 %

30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% I ncr eased

A l r eady t aken

knowl edge of

act i on

pover t y

V er y li kely in

V er y l ikel y in

V er y li kely i n

f ut ur e t o t ake

f ut ur e t o j oi n

f ut ur e t o suppor t

i n d i v i d u a l a c t i o n c o mmu n i t y a c t i o n

pol i ci es t o r educe pover t y

Study Circles 44 Participated in Study Circles

LeadershipPlenty® 31 Participated in LeadershipPlenty

Community Progress: Study Circles and Leadershipplenty® Survey Results

LeadershipPlenty® Post-Survey Data:

LeadershipPlenty® Pre-Survey Data:

DEER PARK COMPARED TO ALL WASHINGTON HORIZONS COMMUNITIES:

HO R I Z ON S C OM M U N I T Y : D EER PA R K PO V ER T Y R A T ES C OM PA R ISO N C EN SU S W I T H ST U D Y C IR C LE A D U LT PA R T I C I PA N T S

WAYS PROGRAM HAS HELPED TO ADDRESS/CHANGE POVERTY IN COMMUNITY FROM LEADERSHIPPLENTY POSTSURVEYS 6.09

Deer Park

54 .2 %

All Washington Horizons communities

60. 0%

4 1.7% 50. 0%

2 9 .2 %

40. 0% 30. 0%

53 . 8 %

M or o e pe opl e a r e a wa r e of pov e r t y

15.1%

4 7.1%

i n t he c ommuni t y

20. 0%

6 6 .8 % 70 .6 %

We a r e di s c us s i ng pov e r t y a nd wha t t o do a bout i t

10. 0% 0. 0%

C e ns us

LP A dul t s 1 0 0 % FP G

LP A dul t s 1 5 0 % FP G

LP A dul t s 2 0 0 % FP G

4 4 .2 %

M or e pe opl e a r e s t e ppi ng up t o

3 5.3 %

a s s i s t t hos e i n pov e r t y

3 3 .6 %

M or e l ow i nc ome pe opl e a r e i nv ol v e d i n t he c ommuni t y

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: DEER P ARK AGE COM P ARISONS CENSUS WITH LEADERSHIP P LENTY P ARTICIP ANTS 4.09

17. 6 % 4 0 .9 % 4 1.2 %

We e a r e wor ki ng t o c r e a t e c ha nge s i n publ i c pol i c y

Census 60

2 5.6 % 2 3 . 5%

M or e pe opl e a r e ge t t i ng he l p t o

5 2 .8

LP Participants

ge t out of pov e r t y

2 3 .6 %

W a r e t a k i ng c onc r e t e s t e ps t o We a ddr e s s pov e r t y

50

17. 6 %

3 2 .5 40

0. 0%

10. 0%

20. 0%

30. 0%

40. 0%

50. 0%

60. 0%

70. 0%

80. 0%

30

14 .7 20

10

7 .4 %

18 .5 %

7 0 .4 %

Deer Park BEFORE

D E E R P A R K C O M P A R E D T O A LL WA H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT IE S : B E F O R E A N D A F T E R S E LF R A T IN G S LE A D E R S H IP S KILLS F R O M LE A D E R S H IP P LE N T Y P O S T S UR V E Y S 6 .0 9

Deer Park AFTER All Washington BEFORE

0

Under 18 years

18 to 64 years

65 years and over 

5.0

All Washington AFTER

4.5

HOR I Z ON S C OM M U N IT Y : D EER PA R K PR IO R EX PER IEN C E A N D C OM M U N IT Y R OLES O F LEA D ER SHIPPLEN T Y PA R T I C I PA N T S 4 .0 9

4.0 3.5

2.72 3 3 .3 %

2.5

3 3 .3 %

2.58 2.47

2.71 2.62

3.94 3.72

2.71 2.41 2.23

2.0

25. 0%

3.81 3.53

4.02

4.09 3.94 3.74 3.53

3.82 3.61 3.69 3.35

4.00 3.80

4.53 4.28 3.76 3.75 3.95 3.76

3.12

35. 0% 30. 0%

3.82 3.73

3.18

45. 0% 40. 0%

4.10 4.05 3.94 3.88 3.65 3.73

3.0

4 8 .1%

50. 0%

4.35 4.13

4.47

2.23

3.12 2.45 2.59

2.57 2.33 2.24

2.41 2.29

2.29 2.35

2.29 2.13

2.41 2.24 2.29 2.11

2.48 2.59

2.682.65 2.39

20. 0% 15. 0%

7. 4 %

10. 0%

7.4 %

1.5

3 . 7%

5. 0%

1.0

0. 0% E ver

P er son who

A ct i ve but

Just an

N ot r eal l y

N or or ever

i nvol ved

ma k e s

not a

or di nar y

par t of t he

an elected

l eader shi p

c o mmu n i t y

deci si on

per son

c o mmu n i t y

of f i ci al

p r o g r a m?

deci si ons

ma k e r

I am abl a e to

I am abl e t o

I am abl e t o

I am abl e t o

I am abl e t o

I know how t o

I now how t o

r eco gni z e

wor k wi t h t he

i dent i f y t he

l ead

manage

pl an and

ass es s t he

v al ue of

l eade er shi p

l eader shi p i n

s t ages of

pr oduct i v e

c onf l i ct i n

i mpl ement

val ue of

br i ngi ng

s ki l l s i n

my

gr oup

meet i ngs .

gr oup wor k.

communi t y

gr oup

c i t i z ens

ot her h s

or gani z at i on

devel opment .

c hange

pr obl em-

t oget her t o

s ol v i ng

t al k about

ef f or t s.

i s sues .

and/ or

pr oj ec t s.

gr eat er c ommuni t y.

Scale of 1=St rongly Disagree t o 5 =St rongly Agr ee

I k now t he