-
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY
MANILA FASHIONS INC., Petitioner, C.T.A . CASE NO. 4639
- versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, X -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
X
D E C I S I 0 N This is
an
respondent
appeal from
Commissioner
requiring the
the
of
Internal Revenue
certificate of sale
under Sec. Code on
the
Revenue
Internal
documentary stamp
the National
decision of
196 of
a sheriff's
covering real property
sold in
an e xecu tion sale. Petitioner Manila engaged
in
the
Fashions Inc,
bu siness
of
a corpor ation
manufacturing
and
exporting ready-to -wear garments, was able to obtain a fav o rable
judgment
Industrial Co.
125 of the
Econ Co mme rcia l
( ECIC for brevity)
C-13655 entitled Commercial and
against
"Manila
in Civil Case No.
Fashions
Industrial Co."
said decision,
Eco n Commercial
1010
Inc.
vs.
rendered by
Kalookan Regional Trial
'
and
Court.
Econ Branch In the
and Industrial
Co.
DECISION C.T.A. Case No. 4639 -
2
-
(ECIC) was adjudged li ab le to in the
amount
of
more
partial satisfaction buildin g owned by
the petitioner herein
than P12,000,000.00.
of
the
j udgment,
ECIC was levied
petitioner in a public
factory
and so l d
auction in the
of P5,000 , 000.00 with the
a
In
to the
total amou n t
corresponding certificate
of sale peing issued by the sheriff. The
petitioner
certificate of sale Deeds \-Thich,
as a
presente d
sheriff 's
the
to the approp riate condition
for its
Register of registra tion
required the petitioner to pay the documentary sta mp tax,
if
an y
certifi cate
is of
respondent .
due
thereon,
exemption HoH·ev er ,
duly
the
assessed the petitioner
or
to
secure
issued
by
respondent's
the su m of
a the
examiner
PSO,OOO.OO with
an additional P12,500.00 as pena lt y for late payment of
the
tax
based
on
sheriff's certificate
the of
c ontention
sale
documentary stamp tax under
that
the
to
the
is subject
S e ction 196 of
the Tax
Code. In
order
to
registr atio n of the
preve nt
any
de l ay
s h eri ff's certi ficate
the pe t itioner paid under
protest the total
in
the
of sale , sum of
P62,500 . Thereafter , it sou ght for a reconsideration of th e assess ment made by
1011
the respond e nt' s ex aminer
)
DECISION C.T.A. Case No. 4639 -
3 -
based on the argument that the documentary stamp tax under Sec. 196 of the sheriff's
Tax Code does not
certificate
of
sale
as
apply to a
it
does
not
transfer any right of possession or ownership on the real
property
therefore
subject
be
purview of
construed
the
submitted by
thereof
said
as
a
"sale"
provision.
the petitioner
subject to the
and
It
that
should
not
within
the
is,
however,
the document
documentary stamp tax
is
under Section
188 of the Tax Code. In his final decision
dated May 20,
1991, the
respondent denied the petitioner's
claim for refund
stating
conveyance
that
"with
regard
to
and
transfers of real properties, the time of accrual of the tax serves snugly as the decisive factor" in the determination of
the liability
to the
stamp tax under Section 196 of the
documentary
Tax Code.
according to the respondent is from
This,
the time of the
execution of the certificate of sale by the sheriff. Thus, the case is whether
only issue or not
sale is subject to
to be
resolved in
a sheriff's
this
certificate of
the documentary stamp J
tax under
Section 196 of the Tax Code, or, stating it from the point of
view
·of
the
1012
respondent, when
does
the
DECISION C. T .A. Cas e No. 4 639 - 4 -
documentary stamp tax under Section
196 " accru e " o r
attach on a sheriff's certificate of sale? We rule in favor of the petitioner. Section 196 of the Tax Code provides: "Sec tion 196. Stamp tax on deeds of sale and conveyance of the real property. On al l conveyances, deeds, instruments, or wr i tings, other than g ran t s, patents, or original ce rtificates of adjudication i ss u ed by th e Gover nment, whereby any lands, tenem e nts or other realty sold shall be granted, assigned, transferred, or otherwise conveyed to the purchaser, or purchasers, or to any other person or persons designated by such pu rchaser or purchasers, there shall be collected a documentary stamp tax at the following rates: XXX
XXX
XXX
(b ) For eac h additional one thousand pesos, or fractional part thereof in excess of one thousand pesos of such consideration or value, te n pesos. XXX
XXX
XXX
A docu mentary stamp tax is in excise tax. into a
It is
transaction
a tax on the rather
nature of an
th~
privilege to ente r
than
on
the
doc ument
itself (Azarraga vs. Rodriguez, 9 Phil.637). It is
worth
transa ct ion in whereby a
emphasizing
the present
contr acting party
1 01~
1
,that the
c~se
particu l ar
involves a
obligates to
s ale ,
transfer
)
DECISION C.T.A. Case No. 4639 -
5 -
the ownership and to deliver a d eterminate thing for a price certain
(Art.
It could
be
1458, Civil Cod e ).
easily discerned
and
document
cover consummated sales, for a particula r
t~ansfer
the law requires that
the
under Section 196 that
participial use of the words the conveyance
that from
subject thereof
must
in determining whether
is covere d by
its provisio n,
the conveyan ce and
deed must
embody th e following f a cts: 1.
Lands, tenem e nts, or realty sold1
2.
Th e lands, tenement s , or
ha s
been
sold
be
realty that
2ra nted,
assigned,
transferred, or otherwise conv eyed
to the
pur c haser. In the c ase of Gonzales 355), the Supreme
v s. Calim bas (51 Phil.
Court descri bed a
certificate of
sale as follows : XXX
XXX
XXX
In this connection the American decisions call attention to t h e difference between the effects of the delivery of t h e certificate of sale which is given to the purchaser at the time the sale is made and the deed which i s delivere dI to him at the expiration of the period ,of redemption. The certificate issued to the purchaser under Section 463 of thi Code of Civil Proc e dure is intended to be a mere memorial of the fact that purchase was made by the pe r son named as buyer in the cer t ificat e . This document is not in tended to operate as an absolu te
1014
DECISION C.T.A. Case No. 4639 -
6 -
transfer of the property, but merely to identify the property, to show the price paid, and the date when the right of redemption expired. The effective conveyance of the land is accomplished by the deed which is issued only after the period of redemption has expired. The transfer is not perfect until the execution and delivery of the sheriff's deed, though it must be understood that when the deed is executed it operates by relation, from the time when the lien of the judgement was acquired (Foorman vs. Wallace, 75 Cal., 552, 556). As is said in Pike vs. Halpin (188 Mich., 447, 450), the rights secured by an execution purchaser at the sale are inchoate before the deed, and it is necessary for the purchaser to procure his deed to complete his title. The mere purchase and certificate of sale alone do not confer any right to the possession of beneficial use of the premise". (Underscoring supplied) The
respondent
had
himself
admitted
the
soundness of the above ruling. Accordingly, a simple analysis of the uncontested nature
of a certificate
of sale would readily provide Us with the conclusion that the said document
does not satisfy
enumerated requisites of inasmuch as
the
mere
certificate of sale transfer any
only upon the that the
sheriff's
ipso facto
convey or
possession over
execution of the
becomes effective
the subject
thereof.
final deed
the real
or consummated.
101 .
Tax Code
the
the ownership
conveyance of
of the
execution of
does not
right of
property, much less
Sec. 196
the above-
It is of sale
property involved Parenthetically,
DECISION C.T.A. Case No. 4639 -
7 -
it might as well be stated that Sec. 196 imposes its corresponding documentary conveyance and involved.
deed of
conveyance becomes deed of sale
both
the documentary only from the or
the
property stamp tax
time that the when the
final
has been duly executed by the sheriff.
the Tax
provision
on
the real
consummated
Furthermore, a VII of
sale of
Consequently,
under Sec. 196 accrues
stamp tax
thorough
Code
therein
examination of
reveals that
which
makes
the only reference
Title other to
a
transaction of sale is Section 176 which provides:
)
Section 176. Stamp tax on sales, agreement to sell, memoranda of sales, deliveries or transfer of bonds, due bills, certificates of obligation, or shares or certificates of stock.XXX
XXX
XXX
(Underscoring supplied) A comparative circumspection of Sec. 196 of the Tax Code with the above-quoted legislative intent to 196
'
provision confirms a
impose the
documentary stamp
to transactions
tax under
Sec.
involving
consummated
sales.
The
or
documents
ommission
of
"agreement to sell" and "memoranda of sale" from the application of Sec. 196 could only be construed as a deliberate intention
to exclude
memorandum of sale of
from
a real property
1016
its scope
a
which is but
DECISION C.T.A. Case No. 4639 -
8 -
an apt description of the
sheriff's certificate of
sale subject of this present case. No
less
than
Regulation
Revenue
(Documentary Stamp Tax
No.
Regulations) duly
26
issued by
the respondent conforms to the foregoing conclusion , the pertinent provision of which provides: XXX
XXX
XXX
"Sec. 165. Dee d executed by sheriff, etc. Deeds of fi n al sale, executed by the sheriff after the period of one year of legal redemp t ion had expired in accordance with t h e Code of Civil Procedure, are subject to the documentary stamp tax. (Underscoring supplied) XXX
XXX
XXX
Finally, considering that the documentary stamp tax under Sec . 196 is already imposable on the final deed of sale, in no instance can We similarly impose the same
documentary
stamp
tax on
the
sheriff's
certificate of sale of the very same transaction. It is a
settled
rule
documentary stamp excise tax,
may
Herald Lumber Co. We
hold,
in
our
tax, being
jurispru dence in the
only be
collected
10 Phil.
372) :
however,
that
nature of once (CIR
the
a an vs.
sheriff's
certificate of sale is subject · to the three (3) peso documentary stamp tax
under Section 188
on certificate) of the Tax Code.
1017
(Stamp tax
DECISION C.T.A. Case No. 4639 -
WHEREFORE,
P62,497.00
-
judgment is hereby rendered ordering
the respondent to refund of
9
to the petitioner
representing
erroneously
the sum collected
tax. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Metro Manila, September 29, 1993.
Q~~ '2,- ~ ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Judge
C E R T I F I C A T I 0 N I hereby certify that the after due
consultation
Court of Tax Appeals in
among
decision was reached the members
of
the
accordance with Sectio n 13,
Article VIII of the ConstitutionI .
· e~Q.~~ ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Pres iding Judge Court of Tax Appeals
101&