Consti 2 Syllabus 2018-2019.docx

1

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 2 SYLLABUS FOR PRELIMS First Week – October 29 FUNDAMENTAL POWERS OF THE STATE Three Inherent Powers of the State Similarities, Distinctions, Limitations A. Police Power Definition Requisites of Valid Exercise Scope and General Characteristics Limitations Test to determine the validity of police power Cases: (1) Ortigas & Co. vs. CA, G.R 126102, December 4, 2000 (2) Lucena Grand Central Terminal vs. JAC Liner, G.R. 148339, February 23, 2005 (3) City of Manila vs. Judge Laguio, G.R. 118127, April 12, 2005 (4) Carlos Superdrug Corporation vs. DSWD, et al., G.R. 166494, June 29, 2007 (5) Social Justice Society vs. Alfredo Lim, G.R. 187836, November 25, 2014 B. Power of Eminent Domain Definition Who may exercise Requisites for Valid Exercise Cases: (6) Manila Memorial Park vs. Secretary, DSWD, G.R. 175356, December 3, 2013 (7) Spouses Cabahug vs. National Power Corporation, G.R. 186069, January 30, 2013 (8) Landbank of the Philippines vs. Escarilla & Co., G.R. 178046, June 13, 2012 (9) Reyes vs. National Housing Authority, G.R. 147511, January 20, 2003 C. Power of Taxation Definition Requisites of Valid Exercise Who may exercise Limitation Double Taxation

2 Tax Exemption License Fee vs. Tax Cases: (10) Gerochi vs. Department of Energy, G.R. 159796, July 17, 2007 (11) City Government of Quezon City, et al., vs. Bayan Telecommunications, Inc., G.R. 162015, March 6, 2006 (12) Abakada Guro Party List, et al. vs. Ermita, et al., G.R. 168056, September 1, 2005 Second Week – November 5 BILL OF RIGHTS I. Due Process and Equal Protection of the Law A. Due Process Definition Coverage of protection Purpose of Due Process Requirements of Due Process Substantive Due Process Requisites Procedural Due Process Requisites Two Aspects of Procedural Due Process Requirements of due process in administrative proceedings Cases: (13) Tomas G. Velasquez, et al. vs. Helen B. Hernandez, G.R. No. 150732, August 31, 2004 Common Requirement of Procedural Due Process in Judicial of Administrative Proceedings Void for Vagueness Doctrine Case: (14) Estrada vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 19, 2001 (15) James M. Imbong, et al. vs. Hon. Paquito N.Ochoa, April 8, 2014 Overbreadth Doctrine Case: (16) & (17) Quinto vs. Comelec, 605 SCRA 258 (2009) and 613 SCRA 385 (2010) Operative Fact Doctrine Case: (18) Belgica, et al., vs. Ochoa, Jr., G.R. No. 208566

3 Due Process Cases: (19) Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, Gr 104768, July 21, 2003 (20) GSIS vs. Montesclaros, G.R. 146494, July 14, 2004 (21) Lim vs. Court of Appeals, Gr 111397, August 12, 2002 (22) Government of the United States of America vs. Judge Puruganan, G.R. 1488571, September 24, 2002 (23) Senator Jinggoy Estrada vs. Office of The Ombudsman, G.R. 212140-41, January 21, 2015 (24) Yrasuegui vs. PAL, Inc., G.R. No. 168081, October 17, 2008 (25) Secretary of Justice vs. Lantion, G.R. No. 139465, October 17, 2000 (26) Republic vs. Cagandahan, G.R. No. 166676, September 12, 2008 (27) People vs. Silverio, G.R. No. 174689, October 22, 2007 Third Week – November 12 B. Equal Protection of the Law Definition Scope Valid Classification - Requisites Cases: (28) Mirasol vs. DPWH, G.R. 158793, June 8, 2006 (29) Jose Jesus Disini vs. Secretary of Justice, G.R. 203335, April 22, 2014 (30) Jesus Garcia vs. Hon. Ray Alan Drilon, G.R. 179267, June 25, 2013 (31) Philippine Judges Association vs. Prado, G.R. 105371, November 11, 1993 (32) Chavez vs. PCGG, G.R. 130716, December 9, 1998 (33) Himagan vs. People of the Philippines, et al., G.R. No. 113811, October 7, 1994 Doctrine of Relative Constitutionality or Principle of Altered Circumstance Case: (34) Central Bank Employees Association, Inc. vs. BSP, G.R. No. 148208, December 15, 2004 NO CLASSES ON NOVEMBER 19, 26 AND DECEMBER 3

4 Fourth Week – December 10 II. Non-Impairment of Contracts Laws that are considered an impairment of a contract Case: (35) Batangas CATV, Inc. vs. The Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 138810, September 29, 2004 III. Freedom of Expression, Press, Association and Assembly A. Freedom of Expression/Speech Meaning of freedom of speech and of the press What is included in the freedom of expression What is included in “speech” and “expression” (36) Ayer Productions vs. Capulong and Ponce Enrile, G.R. No. 82380; and (37) McElroy vs. Capulong, G.R. No. 82398, April 29, 2008 Three Tests on Restrictions to Free Speech Dangerous Tendency Doctrine Balancing of Interest Clear and Present Danger Rule B. Freedom of the Press Four Aspects of the Freedom of the Press Freedom from prior restraint (38) Francisco Chavez vs. Raul M. Gonzales, etc., et al., G.R. No. 168338, February 15, 2008 Freedom from subsequent punishment Freedom of access to information (39) Legaspi vs. Civil Service Commission, G.R. No. L-72119, May 29, 1987 Freedom of Circulation (40) Burgos, Sr. vs. Chief of Staff, G.R. No. L64261, December 26, 1984; (41) Mutuc vs. Comelec, G.R. No. L-32717, November 26, 1970 (42) New York Times vs. U.S. 403 U.S. 713 [Fifth Week -PRELIM EXAM-December 17) MIDTERM Sixth Week – January 7

5 C. Right of Assembly (43) Primicias vs. Fugoso, G.R. No. L1800, January 27, 1948 (44) Reyes vs. Bagatsing, G.R. No. L-65366, November 9, 1983 (45) Bayan Karapatan, Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP) vs. Eduardo Ermita, et al., G.R. No. 169838, April 25, 2006 D. Right of Association The right of government employees to form unions and the right to strike (46) Alliance of Government Workers vs. Minister of Labor and Employment, G.R. No. L-60403, August 3, 1993 (47) GSIS vs. Kapisanan ng mga Manggagawa sa GSIS, G.R. 170132, December 6, 2006 (48) Bel Air Village Association vs. Dionisio, G.R. No. L-38354, June 30, 1989 IV. Freedom of Religion –pp. 307-320 Suarez Definition of Religion Three Principal Parts of Art. III, Sec. 5 Non-establishment clause Free exercise clause Non-religious test clause Two Aspects of Freedom of Religion Freedom to believe Freedom to act on one’s belief Cases: (49) Gerona vs. Secretary of Education, 106 Phil 11 (1969) (50) Ebralinag vs. The Division Superintendent of Schools of Cebu, G.R. No. 95770, March 1, 1993 (51) Alejandro Estrada vs. Soledad S. Escritor, A.M. No. P-02-1651, June 22, 2006 Seventh Week – January 14 V. Liberty of Abode and Travel A. Liberty of Abode B. Right to Travel Meaning of Liberty of Abode and Travel Cases: (52) Rubi vs. Provincial Board of Mindoro, G.R. No. L-14078, March 7, 1919

6 (53) Villavicencio vs. Lukban, G.R. No. L14639, March 25, 1919 (54) Cuenca vs. Salazar, G.R. No. 99308, November 13, 1992 (55) Salonga vs. Hermoso, G.R. No. L-53622, April 25, 1980 (56)Marcos vs. Manglapus, G.R. No. 88211, September 15, 1989 VI. Freedom of Information and Right to Privacy A. Freedom of Information Two Rights Guaranteed Scope of Right to Information Case: (57) Chavez vs. Public Estates Authority and Amari Coastal Bay Development, G.R. No. 133250, July 9, 2002 (58) Valmonte vs. Belmonte, G.R. No. 74930, February 13, 1989 B. Right to Privacy of Communication and Correspondence Effect of Violation of the Right When may it be validly violated Coverage of the guarantee R.A. No. 4200 Anti Wire Tapping Act Effect of Violation When can court authorize wire-tapping Cases: (59) People vs. Sy Juco, G.R. No. L-41957, August 28, 1937 (60) Ramirez vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 93833, September 28, 1995 (61) Garcillano vs. House of Representatives Committee on Public Information, G.R. No. 170338, December 23, 2008 (62) Zulueta vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 107383, October 16, 1986 (63) Waterous Drug Corporation vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 1113271, October 16, 1996 Eighth Week – January 21 Midterm Exam FINALS Ninth Week – January 28 VII. Rights Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures and Illegal Arrests A. Right Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures

7  Requisites of a Valid Search Warrant  Warrantless Searches  Exclusionary Rule Cases: (64) People of the Philippines vs. Eden del Castillo, G.R. No. 153254, September 30, 2004 (65) People vs. Huang Zhen Hua and Jogy Lee, G.R. No. 139301, September 29, 2004 (66) Feliciano Galvante vs. Hon. Orlando Casimiro, G.R. No. 162808, April 22, 2008 (67) People vs. Omaweng, G.R. No. 99050, September 2, 1992 (68) People vs. Gatward, G.R. No. 119772, February 7, 1997 B. Right Against Illegal Arrests  Warrantless Arrests (69) Arsenio Vergara Valdez vs. People, G.R. No. 170180, Novemebr 23, 2007 (70) Harvey vs. Defensor-Santiago, G.R. No. 82544, June 28, 1988 (71) Robin Padilla vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 121917, March 12, 1997 Tenth Week – February 4 VIII. Writs of Habeas Corpus, Amparo and Habeas Data A. Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus  Writ of Habeas Corpus  When Available Cases: (72) Ilusorio vs. Bildner, G.R. No. 139789, May 12, 2000 (73) Carmona vs. UDMC, 93 SCRA 440, October 15, 1979 (74) Lansang vs. Garcia, G.R. No. L-33964, December 11, 1971 (75) Padilla-Garcia vs. Enrile, G.R. No. 71388, April 20, 1983 (76) SPO2 Manalo vs. PNP Chief Calderon, G.R. No. 178920, October 15, 2007 B. Writ of Amparo  Writ of Amparo  When Available Cases: (77) Spouses Rozelle Raymond Martin and Claudine Margaret Santiago vs. Raffy Tulfo, et al., G.R. No. 205039, October 21, 2015 (78) Edgardo Navia, et al. vs. Virginia Pardico, G.R. No. 184467, June 19, 2012

8 (79) Gen. Avelino Razon, vs. Mary Jean B. Tagitis, G.R. No. 182498, December 3, 2009 C. Writ of Habeas Data  Writ of Habeas Data  When Available (80) Melissa Roxas vs. Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, et al., G.R. No. 189155, September 7, 2010 (81) Vivares vs. St. Theresa’s College, et al., G.R. No. 202666, September 29, 2014 Eleventh Week- February 11 IX.

Rights of Persons Under Custodial Investigation  Rights of a Person Under Investigation Cases: (82) Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 U.S. 346 (1966) (83) People vs. Baloloy, G.R. 140740, April 12, 2002 (84) People vs. Mahinay, G.R. 122485, February 1, 1999 (85) People vs. Abulencia, G.R. 138403, August 22, 2001

X. Right to Bail  Bail  Right to Bail: General Rule Exception  Basic Principles of the Right to Bail  Factors to Consider in Fixing Bail  Forms/Kinds of Bail Cases: (86) Government of the US vs. Judge Puruganan and Mark Jimenez, G.R. 148571, December 17, 2002 (87) Anita Esteban vs. Hon Reynaldo A. Alhambra, G.R. No. 135012, September 7, 2004 Twelfth Week – February 17 XI. Rights of an Accused A. Presumption of Innocence (88) Benito Astorga vs. People, G.R. No. 154130, August 20, 2004 B. Privilege Against Self-Incrimination (89) People vs. Judge Ayson, G.R. No. 85215, July 7, 1989 (90) Chavez vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 19169, August 19, 1968

9 C. Right to Speedy, Impartial and Public Trial (91) Roque vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 129978, May 12, 1995 (92) Abadia vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 105597, September 23, 1994 D. Right to Speedy Disposition Cases (93) Roquero vs. The Chancellor of UP Manila, G.R. 181851, March 9, 2010 E. Punishments (94) Echegaray vs. Secretary of Justice, G.R. 132601, January 19, 1999 (95) Lim vs. People, G.R. No. 149276, September 27, 2002 F. Others 1. Involuntary Servitude 2. Non-Imprisonment for Debt (96) Sura vs. Martin, G.R. No. L-2509, November 29, 1968 (97) Arceta vs. Judge Mangrobang, G.R. No. 152895, June 15, 2004 3. Ex Post Facto Laws 4. Bill of Attainder (98) People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 101724, July 3, 1992 Thirteenth Week - February 24 and Review for the Finals 5. Double Jeopardy (99) People vs. The Sandiganbayan and Alejandro Cillapando, G.R. No. 164185, July 23, 2008 (100) People vs. Judge Pineda, G.R. No. 44205, February 11, 1993 (101) Villareal vs. Aliga, G.R. No. 166995, January 13, 2014 (102) People vs. Dela Torre, G.R. No. 137953-58, March 11, 2002 (103) People v. Perlita J. Tria-Tirona, G.R. No. 130106, July 15, 2006 (104) Argel vs. Judge Pascua, A.M. No. RTJ-94-1131, August 20, 2001 (105) Jose Jesus Disini vs. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 203335, February 18, 2014

10 (106) People vs. Judge Villarama, G.R. No. 99287, June 23, 1992 Fourteenth Week – Final Examination March 4