Commissioner

Commissioner Delhi Police Police Head Quarters Near ITO New Delhi 06/04/2004 Sub: - FAVOURING ACCUSED BY EOW AND IGNORING THE POINTS RAISED BY COMPLAINANT, GIVING AN IMPRESSION THAT DELHI POLICE IS FOR CRIMINALS ALWAYS WITH CRIMINALS. I had given complaint against following persons to Paschim Vihar Police Station and the Economics Offences Wing, Crime Branch: Paschim Vihar I/O took view that the case does not fall under his preview so it was sent to West District Head quarters. I had sent complaint to EOW, Crime Branch, there investigation were started so I did not took any serious view of I/O Paschim Vihar sending the case to West District Head quarters. ALTHOUGH I WAS APPROACHED BY ACCUSED TO SETTLE THE ISSUE AT THEIR DICTATED TERMS ON PLEA THAT THEY HAVE BRIBED POLICE/NSE/SEBI SO I SHOULD ACCEPT THEIR TERMS AS NOTHING WILL HAPPEN TO THEM. During investigations Mr. Dhan Vir Dut I/O humiliated me and he was forcing me to sign the compromise on dictated terms of the accused. I sent complaint to higher ups against the I/O and met Dy Commissioner EOW regarding misbehavior of Mr. Dhan Vir Dut, after which the enquiry was transferred to I/O Mr. Romesh Lamba in Dec-2003. I had been asking progress from IO from time to time and was told that the investigations are still in progress. Recently I was sent feeler by accused that they have managed with Delhi Police, so now they will not compromise even on terms offered earlier. On knowing such a reaction from accused, I enquired progress on phone of my complaint on 25/03/2003 and was told by Mr. Ramesh Lamba that my case has been sent to NSE for investigation and action, as no case can be made from my complaint under any section of IPC against broker/sub-broker. I HAVE ALSO RECEIVED LETTER REF No 800/SO/DP/EOW/CRIME Br DATED 13/03/2004 ON 31/03/2004, ADDRESSED TO REGINAL MANAGER NSE FOR TAKING UP MATTER AGAINST M/S SUNGLOW (ACCUSED No-3) THERE IS NO MENTION ABOUT OTHER TWO ACCUSED

ONE OF WHOM IS KEY ACCUSED, WITH COPY ENDORSED TO UNDERSAIGNED, WITH REMARKS THAT FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE IF ANY MAY BE MADE WITH REGINAL MANAGER, NSE. I am really surprised to hear such an outcome after 3 months of investigations. I HAD BEEN IN CONSTANT TOUCH WITH PROGRESS AND CAME TO KNOW THAT I/O WAS INTERROGATING THE ACCUSED RIGOROUSLY AND EVEN USING 3RD DEGREE METHODS, MR. V.K.KAPOOR OF M/S SUNGLOW HIMSELF TOLD THAT IN LAST WEEK OF FEB HE WAS INTERROGATED BY I/O IN DARK ROOM. I FAIL TO UNDERSTAND AFTER USING THIRD DEGREE, HOW I/O CAME TO CONCLUSION THAT NO CASE UNDER ANY SECTION OF IPC CAN BE MADE?

ACCUSED HAVE SENT FEELERS THAT THEY HAVE SPENT IN LAKHS TO PLEASE CONCERNED OFFICERS. MY CASE IS CLEAR-CUT CASE OF CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST AND CHEATING. BY ALL THREE ACCUSED NAMED IN COMPLAINT. HOW & WHY MR. ANIL THKURAL AND MR. B.R.ARORA HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED; I AM NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND. Mr. B.R. Arora gave false statement that he only introduced complainant to Mr. Anil Thukral and he was not concerned with dealings with S.K.Kapoor, AND THAT HAND WRITTEN STATEMENTS OF DEALS WERE GIVEN BY HIM AS HANDWRITING OF MR. ANIL THUKRAL WAS NOT READABLE TO COMPLAINANT. I/O WAS REQUESTED TO TAKE SPECIMENS OF HANDWRITING OF BOTH PERSONS TO VERIFY STATEMENT, AND ALSO RECORD STATEMENT OF OTHER CAR POOL MEMBERS TO ASCERTAIN THE FACTS, BUT I/O DID NOT DO SO, TO FAVOUR THE ACCUSED. Accused Mr. Anil Thukral had admitted before IO Mr. Dhan Vir Dut that they were cheating to the tune of 10-12 annas (about 75p per share) and not transferring some bids, which were actually materializing. Mr. Dhan Vir Dut did not record this statement. THIS FACT HAS BEEN MENTIONED IN MY COMPLAINT against Mr. Dhan Vir Dut. THIS ACT AMOUNTS TO CHEATING AND CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST. WITH CHEATING OF 60-75 PAISA PER SHARE ONE CAN LOOSE LAKHS OF Rs IN TRADING OF SHARES. EOW BY NOT TAKING ANY ACTION IS ENCOURAGING SUCH A MALPRACTICES AND CHEATING BY SUB-BROKERS AND LEGALISING THEIR THIS CHEATING ACT. THIS CHARGE CAN BE EASILY PROOVED FROM HAND WRITTEN STATEMENT OF DEALS GIVEN BY ACCUSED MR B.R.ARORA AND COMPUTER OUT PUT OF DEALS GIVEN BY M/S SUNGLOW TO NSE.

It has been shown that Mr. Anil Thukral and Mr. B.R.Arora was not sub-broker of M/S Sunglow although they were posing as such broker. FOR THIS ALLEGATION SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE IS AVAILABLE ON RECORDS. THIS ACT AMOUNTS MISREPRESENTATION WHICH IS SURELY COVERED IN IPC/ CHEATING. HAS IO CONFIRMED THAT MR. B.R.ARORA WAS SUB-BROKER OF M/S SUNGLOW, IF SO I MAY PL BE GIVEN COPY OF FINDINGS. AS PER INDIAN EVIDENCE BURDEN OF PROOF THAT THEY WERE ACTUALLY SUB-BROKERS LIES WITH MR. B.R. ARORA AND ANIL THUKRAL. If some person posses as Doctor, IT IS FOUND THAT HE WAS ACTUALLY NOT SO and complaint is made to Police. WILL POLICE SEND THAT COMPLAINT TO MEDICAL COUNCIL? If some person posses as an Advocate, IT IS FOUND THAT HE WAS ACTUALLY NOT SO and complaint is made to Police. WILL POLICE SEND THAT COMPLAINT TO BAR COUNCIL? I/O HAS IGNORED FOLLOWING ISSUES: I have given hand written statements of Mr. B.R.Arora giving details of deals, in these he has mentioned the NSE settlement number and name S.K.Kapoor, FROM THESE STATEMENTS IO HAS NOT VERIFIED THAT (a) HAVE THESE DEALS BEEN ACTUALLY CARRIED OUT AT ALL (B) IF CARRIED, WERE THESE CARRIED OUT AT THE PRICES SHOWN IN STATEMENT. IF NOT, THIS ACT AMOUNTS TO CHEATING AND CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST. I have given hand written statement of Mr. B.R. Arora showing certain shares with qty shown as balance in my account, as on 31/03/2003, HAS IO VERIFIED THAT THESE WERE ACTUALLY BALANCE IN MY ACCOUNT ON DATE SPECIFIED.

IF NOT, THIS ACT AMOUNTS TO

CHEATING AND CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST BY MR. B.R.ARORA & MR. ANIL THUKRAL. WHERE THESE SHARES HAVE GONE? MERELY TELLING BY THE ACCUSED THAT COMPLAINANT SUFFERED LOSES IS NO GROUND, ACCUSED SHOULD BE ASKED TO GIVE STATEMENTS OF DEALS AS REQUIRED UNDER RULES OF NSE/SEBI. Further it has been admitted by accused that they sold shares of complainant at their own without consent of the complainant THIS ACT AMOUNTS TO CHEATING AND CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST. M/S SUNGLOW ALSO CONFIRMED SO. MY OWN INVESTIGATIONS HAVE SHOWN THAT ALTHOUGH ACCUSED WERE TELLING ME THAT THEY ARE PURCHASING/SELLING SHARES IN MY ACCOUNT, ACTUALLY THEY WERE SIMPLY EXTORTING MONEY FROM ME, MR. B.R.ARORA WAS BLACKMAILING ME AS HE CAME TO KNOW THAT I HAVE TRANSFERRED SOME SHARES WHICH WERE IN MY WIFE’S

ACCOUNT WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE. I have also come to know that Mr. Anil Thukral was not even having D-Mat account and no share was transferred from his d-mat account to M/S Sunglow and visa-versa. HOW A SUB-BROKER CAN FUNCTION WITHOUT D-MAT ACCOUNT? POLICE SAYS, NSE WILL TAKE ACTION, NSE SAYS THEY DO NOT DEAL WITH COMPLAINTS

OF

SUB-BROKERS

NOT

REGISTERED

WITH

NSE

(

MR

ANIL

THUKRAL/B.R.ARORA ARE NOT REGISTERED SUB-BROKERS OF NSE). THIS CLEARLY MEANS THAT ACCUSED ARE LET FREE AFTER GETTING GRATIFICATION. FEW MONTHS BACK THERE WAS NEWS IN HINDUSTAN TIMES THAT EOW ARRESTED ONE PERSON ON COMPLAINT OF A EXPORTERS THAT HE SUFFERED LOSSES, AS HIS VENDOR INTENTIONALLY DID NOT SUPPLY ITEMS, SO THAT HIS L.C. LAPSES. IF ABOVE REFERRED CASE FALLS UNDER IPC, WHY NOT MY CASE, WHERE THERE IS EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST. I REQUEST TO PLEASE DIRECT CONCERNED OFFICIALS TO

COMPLETE THE

INVESTIGATIONS AND FILE CASE IN COMPETENT COURT. S.K.Kapoor 3, Sunshine Apartment A-3, Paschim Vihar New Delhi-110063 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

COPY TO: HON’BLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA HON’BLE PRIME MINISTER HON’BLE HOME MINISTER HON’BLE FINANCE MINISTER HON’BLE CHAIRMAN NATIONAL

HOW CORRUPTION CAN BE ROUTED FROM COUNTRY, WHEN THERE IS OPEN FAVOURISM. POLICE DOES NOT INVESTIGATE PROPERLY IF NOT BRIBED. SINCE CHEATERS WHO CHEAT IN MILLIONS CAN EASILY GIVE LAKHS OF RUPEES TO HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION. PLEASE CONCERNED OFFICERS, CLEAT COMMISSIONER CENTRAL CUT CHEATING CASES ARE TERMED AS CIVIL CASE, IT IS WHY INDIA HAS BEEN VIGILANCE COMMISSION RANKED AS 4TH MOST CORRUPT NATION IN DIRECTOR CBI. WORLD. I AM ENCLOSING COPY OF MY COMPLAINT, PL GET IT EXAMINED WHETHER ANY CASE UNDER ANY SECTION OF IPC CAN BE MADE OR NOT.