Commissioner 06

Commissioner Delhi Police Police Head Quarters Near ITO New Delhi 04/02/2006 Sub: - Request for filling case under Section 166,167,193,217,218 IPC and other relevant sections of IPC against Officials of Delhi Police for ignoring direction of law to injure complainant, making incorrect records to favour accused I had given complaint against following persons to Paschim Vihar Police Station and the Economics Offences Wing, Crime Branch: 1. Shri B.R.Arora, Flat No 5th floor sector-1, NOIDA

265 GH-13, Paschim Vihar New Delhi, OFFICE IOC building

(2) Shri Anil Thukral, C-219, Lajpat Nagar-1, NEW DELHI-110024 (3). Managing Director, M/S Sun Glow Capital Services Ltd 4382/4B 2ND FLOOR, MURARILAL STREET, ANSARI ROAD, DARYAGANJ-DELHI-110002 Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court in number of orders directed that police has to register FIR, if complaint is made regarding any cognizable offence without any reservation regarding correctness of complaint and Police cannot sit as judge to give any judgment. Delhi Police continues to ignore directions to harass Citizens of Delhi. Commissioner of Delhi police does not take any action against erring police officials. A judgement of Supreme Court becomes law and binding on all concerned. Delhi Police officers by ignoring direction of law to injure the complainant committed an offence Under IPC for which I intend to file criminal complaint in competent court. Ignoring direction of law, Paschim Vihar I/O took view that the case does not fall under his preview so it was sent to West District Head quarters. I had sent complaint to EOW, Crime Branch, there investigation were started so I did not took any serious view of I/O Paschim Vihar sending the case to West District Head quarters. Although I was approached by accused to settle the issue at their dictated terms on plea that they have bribed police/NSE/SEBI officials so I should accept their terms as nothing will happen to them. During investigations Mr. Dhan Vir Dut I/O humiliated me and he was forcing me to sign the compromise on dictated terms of the accused. Added some statements on my behalf of his own, rectified statements of accused to save them. This all had been brought to notice of all higher officials of Delhi Police but no action has been taken. Fabricating statement is an offence for which I intend to file criminal complaint against Mr. Dhanvir Dut. I met Dy Commissioner EOW regarding misbehaviour of Mr. Dhan Vir Dut, after which the enquiry was transferred to I/O Mr. Romesh Lamba in Dec-2003.

In spite of pointing out lapses in investigations and contradicting statements of accused EOW-Delhi Police ignored directions of law & took view that no case can be made from my complaint and send file to NSE. ACCUSED SENT FEELERS THAT THEY HAVE SPENT IN LAKHS TO PLEASE CONCERNED POLICE OFFICERS. In these circumstances, I was forced to file Criminal Writ Petition in Delhi High Court, seeking directions to Delhi Police to file FIR or transfer case to CBI. EOW- Delhi in Status report, EOW Delhi Police has given false/misleading statements, which amount to Criminal offences by concerned Police Officials. I had highlighted the lapses in investigations in my letter dated 06/04/2004 to your good self, but no action has been taken I am giving below the false/misleading statements made by Delhi Police in Status report At page-2 in Status report, it is stated that complaint gave the details of payments made from time to time, but at page-8 said “ complainant could not Give proof of payments made” These are two contradicting statements. It has been shown that Mr. Anil Thukral and Mr. B.R.Arora was not sub-broker of M/S Sunglow although they were posing as such broker. FOR THIS ALLEGATION SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE IS AVAILABLE ON RECORDS. THIS ACT AMOUNTS MISREPRESENTATION WHICH IS SURELY COVERED IN IPC/ CHEATING. Concerned police officials have given false information that during investigations I had given statement that I had requested for transactions in client ID of Mr. Anil Thukral? Any sensible and honest man will try to understand, when I say that I was registered with three brokers before coming into contact with accused persons, WHEN WAS PURCHASING SHARES FROM INITIAL OFFERS SINCE LAST 30 YEARS USING MY OWN NAME, WHY I SHOULD HAVE REQUESTED TO TRANSACTIONS IN OTHER PERSONS CLIENT ID? ACCUSED WERE DEALING WITH DOZENS OF OTHER PERSONS; DID ALL PERSONS REQUESTED FOR DEALING IN CLIENT ID OF ACCUSED? IF SO, WHY? POLICE HAD TO INVESTIGATE AND RECORD STATEMENT OF OTHER PERSONS. This falsely stating that I had made statement that I of my own choice requested for transactions in name of Mr. Anil Thukral is an offence for which I intend to file criminal complaint in competent court. In Status report EOW Delhi Police had said that Mr. Anil Thukral was “Client” of M/S Sunglow without verifying that he was ‘Client” Now it has come to notice that M/s Sunglow and Mr. Anil Thukral fabricated member-client agreement PLACED AS EXH-1 in misc petition in Delhi High Court, copy of which was given to Delhi Police. Police officials intentionally ignored this new evidence to harm/injure complainant and corruptly save accused. Further M/S sunglow has disclosed recently that Mr. Anil Thukral was also operating under name of Mr. Mauz Malik and payments were being credited in name of Mr. Mauz Malik. It means that Mr. Anil Thukral was having two accounts one in name of Mr. Mauz Malik and another in name of Mr. Anil Thukral, which is an offence and amounts to be operating

under fictitious name. POLICE HAD TO TAKE NOTE AND REGISTER CASE AGAINST ACCUSED INCLUDING M/S SUNGLOW, SINCE M/S SUNGLOW KNEW THAT MR. ANIL THUKRAL IS OPERATING UNDER FICTITIOUS NAME AND THEY ALLOWED HIM TO DO SO, HENCE THEY ARE ACCOMPLICE IN CRIME. BUT IN SPITE OF BRINGING THESE NEW FACTS BEFORE OFFICIALS OF DELHI POLICE, DELHI POLICE OFFICIALS HAVE NOT TAKEN ANY ACTION. EOW Delhi Police intentionally to favour accused has not seized the contract notes/ details of deals alleged to have been carried out in name of Mr. Anil Thukral, which police could easily had from NSE or M/s Sunglow and could have investigated following: I have given hand written statements of Mr. B.R.Arora giving details of deals; in these he has mentioned the NSE settlement number and name S.K.Kapoor, FROM THESE STATEMENTS IO HAS NOT VERIFIED THAT (a) HAVE THESE DEALS BEEN ACTUALLY CARRIED OUT AT ALL (B) IF CARRIED, WERE THESE CARRIED OUT AT THE PRICES SHOWN IN STATEMENT. IF NOT, THIS ACT AMOUNTS TO CHEATING AND CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST. I have given hand written statement of Mr. B.R. Arora showing certain shares with qty shown as balance in my account, as on 31/03/2003, IO did not intentionally verify to harm & injure me that these were actually balance in my account on date specified. if not, this act amounts to cheating and criminal breach of trust BY MR. B.R.ARORA & MR. ANIL THUKRAL. Where these shares have gone? Merely telling by the accused that complainant suffered loses is no ground, accused should be asked to give statements of deals as Required under rules of NSE/SEBI. Further it has been admitted by accused that they sold shares of complainant at their own without consent of the complainant this act amounts to cheating and criminal breach of trust. M/s sunglow also confirmed so. My own investigations have shown that although accused were telling me that they are purchasing/selling shares in my account, actually they were simply extorting money from me, MR. B.R.ARORA WAS BLACKMAILING ME AS HE CAME TO KNOW THAT I HAVE TRANSFERRED SOME SHARES WHICH WERE IN MY WIFE’S ACCOUNT WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE. Although similar case against M/s Times Capital Pvt Ltd with office at South Ext. was registered by Delhi Police on complaint by Mr. Debashis Roy Chowdhry . EOW of Delhi Police registered a case against a vendor on complaint by an exporter that vendor intentionally did not supply items in time so that the LC of exporter expires. IF CASE CAN BE REGISTERED ON SUCH AN ALLEGATIONS, WHY NOT IN MY CASE? BECAUSE I HAVE NOT BRIBED POLICE? All above wilful omissions and commissions by Delhi Police amount to criminal acts under various sections of IPC. Accused had been threatening that bribe money goes upto top most officials, so nothing will happen to them, and no action by Top most police officials give suspicion that accused are correct.

I made complaint in August-2003 and police has wasted almost 30 months by ignoring directions of law to harm and injure me, in these circumstances I am left with no alternative but file criminal complaint against all connected Police officials in competent court. I had met DCP-EOW in March-2006 and sent clarifications asked by him, but no action has been taken. Please order filling of FIR against erring police officials namely (a) Inspector Mr Dhanvir Dut (b) Sub-Inspector Mr Romesh Lamba (c) ACP Mr Sharma. (d) Addl DCP Mr. K.K.VYAS AND OTHER TOP POLICE OFFICERS. S.K.Kapoor 3, Sunshine Apartment A-3, Paschim Vihar New Delhi-110063 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

COPY TO: HON’BLE

PRESIDENT

OF HOW CORRUPTION CAN BE ROUTED FROM COUNTRY, WHEN THERE IS OPEN INDIA FAVOURISM. POLICE DOES NOT HON’BLE PRIME MINISTER INVESTIGATE PROPERLY IF NOT BRIBED. HON’BLE HOME MINISTER SINCE CHEATERS WHO CHEAT IN HON’BLE FINANCE MINISTER MILLIONS CAN EASILY GIVE LAKHS OF Central Vigilance Commission RUPEES TO PLEASE CONCERNED Chairman Human Rights OFFICERS, CLEAR CUT CHEATING CASES ARE TERMED AS CIVIL CASE, IT IS commission WHY INDIAN POLICE HAS BEEN RANKED MOST CORRUPT IN WORLD. AS PER LOWER CADRE POLICE OFFICIALS, BRIBE MONEY GOES INTO POCKET OF TOP POLICE OFFICIALS; IT IS WHY THERE IS NO ACTION BY TOP POLICE OFFICERS AGAINST THESE CORRUPT PERSONS. I HAVE DECIDED TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THESE CORRUPT POLICE OFFICIALS AT COST OF MY LIFE. IN CASE OF MY UN-NATURAL DEATH THESE OFFICIALS MAY PL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE.