Comment Return Form (doc.6).docx

  • Uploaded by: HashemAliHashem
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Comment Return Form (doc.6).docx as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,085
  • Pages: 4
Comments Return Form

COMMENTS RETURN FORM

Project:

Revamping PLC project

Document/Drawing Title:

SOW

Document/Drawing Number:

Hold

Sr.

Section

CRF No

Hold

Review Date:

Comment

By

2 weeks

Response

1.1General: Please add the following:  1

1.1



EW-Plant at Damietta governorate it’s about 270km far from Cairo and about 15km from New Damietta city, EW-Plant consist of two phases (Phase II and Phase III). WASCO intends to revamp the control system of its central processing facilities at EW-plant. This is mainly due to most system components were obsolete and malfunction of redundant system.

The two points will be cancelled.

Haitham

For point 1, the added statement is already illustrated in details at system description section. For point 2,the added statement is the same meaning of existing one.

General Scopeof Work: Please add the followings: 2

1.2

 

3

2.1.2

Considering that this SOW shall include but not limited to the followings. Considering that this project is a EPC project.

PH-III: Please add the following:  The phase III consists of two redundant chassis with 5(Fife) I/Os

Action

Haitham

Noted and will be added at section 6

For Point 1: will be considered. For point 2: cancelled.

Will be cancelled Haitham

I don't see any difference from existing. Please clarify?

chassis (4 Chassis communicated through control net including Rev. 0

Page 1 of 4

Comments Return Form

Sr.

Section

Comment

By

Response

Action

prosoft modules for transferring data from flow meters in addition to fifth chasse which is communicated through Ethernet for MCC. For point 1: already considered. For point 2: will be cancelled.

Warranty: Please add the following:  4

5

The guarantee period shall be which come early of as the following: 1- One year as a guarantee for (S/W and H/W) from prevision acceptance certificate and clear all puns list items.

Haitham

Will be negotiated with instrument team.

Haitham

For point 1, Will be negotiated with instrument team.(but in my opinion there is no alternative solution) For point 2, For PHII: Spare channels will be provided are 16 points DI. For PHIII: Spare channels will be provided are aprox. 70 AI points and 32 DI points without 24vDC. So, it is an issue to negotiate for final decision as the above spare points will be sufficient or not. For Point 3: Noted For Point 4: This period doesn't determine up till now. So, i can't

2- Two years as a guarantee started from receiving material at site in case of not install due to reasons related to WASCO, in these case WASCO may ask the contractor to extend the guarantee period by extra one year in addition to the two years (contractor commercial offer shall include the price of this item).

General Requirements and Considerations: Please add the following: 

5

6





Contractor shall propose as an optional any other alternative solution that will implement the same SOW under Allen Bradley umbrella if it we applicable in our case. please be advise that no need for new panel as the FF and F&G new system shall include anew stand-alone panel and accordingly all the old F&G system shall be transferred from old panel which mean that it will grantee the needed spar for old panel. EL Wastani plant is a brown field your offered shall consider implementation of the SOW at minimum S/D period which

Rev. 0

For Point 1: will be cancelled. For point 2: will be considered and reflect at SOW as following: the cards at the new panel will be 1 DI, 2 AO and 2 DO. For point 3: will be considered. For point 4: will be cancelled.

Page 2 of 4

Comments Return Form

Sr.

Section

Comment

By

please note that the maximum S/D period will be tree days.

From our point of view, I suggest the following: 1- May be we should combine the PLC to become one PLC ( using one processor L 74( 16MB)) or L 75 (32MB) instead of two PLCs (Phase II and Phase III). 2- For communication we can use ENT2R instead of control net. 3- Also please noting the following: a- All I/Os racks are still in the same place at phase II and phase III. b- The existing system consists of two PLCs (one for phase II and the other for phase III, but actually we can’t operate phase II without phase III or vice Versa.

6

Haitham

In case we apply the aforementioned suggestions this will allow us to save one control panel which include two PLCs system with redundancy system with all components. If all instrumentation Engineers agree we can hopefully go through with the new suggestions.

7

8

Rev. 0

3.1

4.1.1

Action

add it.

will be part of the technical and commercial evaluation. 

Response

Redundancy problem: 1- The Secondary module is disqualified with the primary at PH III due to lower processor memory (Application oversize)

Ayman El Harony

For Point 1:please be informed that the new processor will be L74 as attached BOM and combination for one PLC don't applicable for the below reasons: 1-This modification will reduce system availability.(as now system will be depend only on one processor) 2- I can't shutdown PHII only. 3-This modification also will take long time to laying new cables, and will perform commissioning again. 4-Almost used signals at PHII are 220V but at PHIII is 24V. For point 2: This point is already considered. For Point 3 (a): No change at I/O list. For Point 3 (b): what is the purpose of this point. Please clarify?

For point 1:Not applicable. For point 2: Already considered. For Point 3(a):will be cancelled. For point 3(b):will be cancelled.

Up till now, there isn't clear reason or evidence for that problem. So, as the system will be replaced, no benefit for list any reason.

Will be cancelled

For Redundancy problem: Ayman El Please refer to BOM. This point is Note: It is required to replace the processors with latest series (1756-L7x) with Harony already considered higher memory size

Already considered.

Page 3 of 4

Comments Return Form

Sr.

Section

Comment

By

Response

Action Will be considered.

9

6

General Requirements and Considerations: Add new point:Contractor shall be commitment by all WASCO policy

Ayman El Harony

The same as point 4 at section 6.

Will be considered. 10

Rev. 0

General

I would like to add new item in the SOW as the following replace master switches in latest version fully by contractor

Ahmed Farag

Noted

Page 4 of 4

Related Documents

Comment Form
November 2019 9
Return Form
December 2019 21
Return Form
October 2019 15
Income Tax Return Form
November 2019 22
Comment
October 2019 39

More Documents from ""