Collaborative Tagging

  • Uploaded by: Mercy Livingstone
  • 0
  • 0
  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Collaborative Tagging as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 685
  • Pages: 13
Collaborative Tagging

Agenda • • • • • • • • • •

Introduction Taxonomy Folksonomy Tagging in Folksonomy Visualizing Folksonomy Folksonomy and Semantic Web Metadata and Semantic Web Folksonomy Advantages Folksonomy Disadvantages Conclusion

Taxonomy • One of the most common strategies for organizing content • Only admin / authorized person can add / edit categorize the content • Use of taxonomy is not possible in websites with user generated content • Content is constantly changing and its not possible to have a standalone taxonomy • No single party can enforce taxonomy in whole user community – Example, Wordpress blog categories. – To overcome the disadvantages in Taxonomy, Folksonomy introduced.

Folksonomy Folksonomy became popular in 2004 Folksonomy is a characteristic of web 2.0 Folksonomy = Collective Tagging = Tagging = Social Tagging = Social Indexing = Collaborative Tagging Folksonomy Online => Delicious

Offline => Library Records

Folksonomy => Folk + Taxonomy 

Folks => Done by people



Taxonomy => Classification of item into groups

Tagging in Folksonomy

gs Ta

Us er s

TAG • Tag is simply a freely chosen set of textual keywords. • Tags not created but specialists and created by users • Tag can be categorized with any word that defines a relationship between the online resource and a concept in the user's mind • Any number of words might be chosen, some of which are obvious representations, others making less sense outside the tag author's context.

Resources

Visualizing Folksonomy • Tag cloud – Way to visualize tag in a Folksonomy. • Tag clouds represents by size, number of times the tag applied to single item and quality of content. • Tag clouds are interactive • Tags are hyperlinks thus allows users to drill down on the data. • Delicious is the first bookmarking site to introduce tagging concept.

Folksonomy and Semantic Web • • • •

Folksonomy intended to make a body of information increasingly easy to search, discover, and navigate over time Folksonomy hold a key in developing semantic web and information retrieval system. Web content searchable through machine readable meta datas. Not sure every web authors have added metadata in their pages. Time consuming to learn and use

How SE Categorize content in WEB <meta name="keywords" content="computing, computer software, computer"> <meta name="description" content="Cheap widgets for sale"> <meta name="author" content=“Mercy Livingstone">

Metadata and Semantic Web 

Examples of Metadata for Book 

Title



Author



Date of Publication



Subject



Unique Indentifier (International Standard Book Number)



Number of pages



Language of text

Metadata and Semantic Web Example of Metadata for Audio – Album Name –

Song title



Year



Composer



Contributing Author



Track Number



Album Artist People also use “Dublin Core” metadata which consists of standard 15 metadata.

Folksonomy Advantages • To provide additional keywords to help search engines and tag services add up your keyword counts and classify your post content. • To provide additional navigation on your site, like an index reference, helping the user find related post content. • Cheap, easy way to classify web content • Capable to adapt to user style • Scalability – easy for everyone use • Reflects user's vocabulary • Help machine to retrieve best information in the web.(If done with accuracy)

Folksonomy Disadvantages •

Polisemy - Same tag with different meaning • Ex, Chicken, Windows



Synonyms – Different tags with same meaning • Ex, Mate,Friend; Ocean, Sea



Plural Vs Singular



Acronym and Abbreviations



No spaces allowed (only single word)



Language Barrier



Organized by amateur



Anti-spam measure is tough

Conclusion • Web is infinite, can’t rely on experts to classify things • Its upto end users to contribute • Single tag is not going to speak the language. The number of increase in tag that matters. Ex. Flickr • Some extend taxonomy also can’t be ruled out. Ex. Library Catalogue. • We have to capitalize on the benefits of both the systems. • University of Pennsylvania adopted Penn Tagg • Beyond the partnership with Taxonomy, Folksonomy moves forward in future classifying web towards creating semantic web.

Related Documents

Collaborative Tagging
April 2020 16
Tagging Akuarium.docx
October 2019 27
Tagging Medal.docx
May 2020 12
Symfony-tagging
August 2019 23
Social Tagging
June 2020 22

More Documents from "Physics Teacher"