Civil Action - Birth Control

r:

WILLIAMS CUKER BEREZOFSKY Woodland Falls Corporate Park 210 Lake Drive East, Suite 101 Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002 (856) 667-0500 Attorneys for PlaintifJ(s)

TERRI REX and CHARLES REX, w/h, Plaintiffs,

FILED DEC 1 4 2007 JUdge Jamie D. Happas SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION MIDDLESEX COUNTY

v.

DOCKET NO. MID-L-7IIO-07-MT ORTHO-McNEIL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON CIVIL ACTION & JOHNSON; JOHNSON & JOHNSON IN RE: ORTHO EVRA BIRTH CONTROL PHARMACEUTICALS RESEARCH and PATCH LITIGATION DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. f/k/a R.W. JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL CASE NO. 275 RESEARCH INSTITUTE; JANE DOE DISTRIBUTORS (1-50); JILL DOE NOTICE OF MOTION AND ORDER MANUFACTURERS (1-50); JACK DOE FOR ADMISSION TO PRACTICE WHOLESALERS (1-50); JAKE DOE PRO HAC VICE SELLERS (1-50); JOHN DOE MARKETERS (1-50); JOAN DOE FORMULATORS (1-50); JIM DOE HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS (1-50); and JEAN DOE (1-50), Defendants.

Plaintiffs, Terri Rex and Charles Rex, request entry of an Order for the admission of counsel pro hac vice. By their signatures below counsel warrant for purposes of this motion that the representations set forth in Case Management Order # I, are true and applicable herein and agree as a condition to the entry of an order granting this motion to comply with the terms and conditions for admission pro hac vice set forth in Case Management Order # 1.

@"..)~ 1."1" v '" ,

!

• . . • 1_"'),_

Attorney Seeking Admission: Bar member, State of: Motion Return Date:

Robert 1. Patterson, Esquire State Bar of Texas, Bar No. 15604500 Friday, , 2007 Yes No

o o o

Motion Fee Paid: Consent of Adversary: Service Upon Counsel of Record: Address of Counsel to be Admitted:

Phone Number:

E-Mail:

G4---­ Robert 1. Patterson, Esquire (Signature of Pro Hac Vice Attorney)

Dated: October 31, 2007

Dated:~ 1-- t), 0 1-­

ORDERED, that Robert J. Patterson, ESQ. is admitted pro hac vice in these matters

subject to the conditions set forth in Case Management Order #1.

Date:

----f-~---'-----+-----

~:v' E'''<9,~.OC AS, J.S.C.

Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unonoosed. Pursuant to BJ:6-2, it tlerefore will be granted essentially for the reasons setforth in the moving papers.