Chapter Iv.docx
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Chapter Iv.docx as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 2,422
- Pages: 22
CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1 Training programme attended by employees 4.1 The table showing the training programmes attended by the employees Table No. 4.1 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Upto 2
14
56
3 to 5
8
32
6 to 8
2
8
8 to 10
1
4
25
100
Total Sources: Primary data Fig.4.1
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Upto 2
3 to 5
6 to 8
8 to 10
Interpretation: From the above figure it can be found out that 56 percentage of the employees had attended upto 2 training programmes .Whereas 32 percentage of the employees had attended 3 to 5 training programme. While 8 percentage of the employees had attended 6 to 8 training programmes. Remaining 4 percentage of the employees had attended 8 to 10 training programmes.
4.2 Training method undergone by employees 4.2 The table showing the training method undergone by the employees Table No.4.2 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Job rotation
15
60
Coaching
7
28
Job instructional technique
2
8
Apprenticeship
1
4
25
100
Total Sources: Primary data Fig 4.2
Percentage of respondents Percentage of respondents 70
60
60 50 40
28
30 20
8
10
4
0 Job rotation
Coaching
Job instructional technique
Apprenticeship
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 60 percentage of the employees had undergone job rotation. Whereas 28 percentage of the employee had undergone coaching. While 8 percentage of the employees had undergone job instructional technique. Remaining 4 percentage of the employees had undergone apprenticeship method of training.
4.3 Person to whom training is provided 4.3 The table showing the opinion employees about to whom the training is provided in Milco Table No.4.3 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
20
80
No
5
20
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig 4.3 90 80 70 60 50
yes
40
no
30 20 10 0
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 80 percentage of the respondents agree that the training is given to new employees and 20 percentage of employees have disagreement.
4.4 Training in improving skills 4.4 The table showing the opinion of the employees about training improves skill. Table No.4.4 Choice
No of respondents
Strongly agree
Percentage of respondents 11
44
Agree
7
28
Neutral
4
16
Disagree
2
8
Strongly disagree
1
4
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig 4.4
Percentage of respondents 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 44 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that training improves the skill. Whereas 28 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 8 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.5 Number of training programmes organised for workers 4.5. The table showing the opinion of employees about the number of training programmes organised for workers are sufficient. Table No. 4.5 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree
2
8
Agree
3
12
Neutral
5
20
Disagree
8
32
Strongly disagree
7
28
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig 4.5
Percentage of respondents 35 30 25 20 Percentage of respondents
15 10 5 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that training programmes organised for employees are sufficient. Whereas 12 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 20 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 32 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 28 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.6 Effectiveness of training programme 4.6. The table showing the opinion of employees about the participation of workers in training programme would help increase its effectiveness
Table No. 4.6 Choice
No of respondents
Strongly agree
Percentage of respondents 12
48
Agree
6
24
Neutral
4
16
Disagree
2
8
Strongly disagree
1
4
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig 4.6
Percentage of respondents 50 40
30 Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 48 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that participation of employees in training programme increase its effectiveness. Whereas 24 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 8 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.7 Absenteeism 4.7 Do you agree that training and development helps to reduce absenteeism. Table No. 4.7 Choice
No. of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
17
68
No
8
32
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig. 4.7 80 70 60 50
Yes
40
No
30 20 10 0 No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 68 percentage of the respondents agree that absenteeism is reduced through training and development and 32 percentage of the respondents have a disagreement.
4.8 Productivity and performance 4.8. The table shows the opinion of employees about enhancing productivity and performance through training Table No.4.8 Choice
No of respondents
Strongly agree
Percentage of respondents 12
48
Agree
6
24
Neutral
4
16
Disagree
2
8
Strongly disagree
1
4
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.8
Percentage of respondents 50 40 30 Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 48 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that productivity and performance are enhanced through training. Whereas 24 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 8 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.9 Period of training programme 4.9. The table shows the opinion of employees about the time period of training programme Table No. 4.9 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree
5
20
Agree
4
16
Neutral
6
24
Disagree
8
32
Strongly disagree
2
8
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.9
Percentage of respondents 35 30 25 20 Percentage of respondents
15 10 5 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 20 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that time period of the training programme was sufficient. Here 16 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 24 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 32 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 8 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.10 Place of training 4.10. The table shows the rating given to the place of training Table No.10 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Excellent
4
16
11
44
Average
3
12
Poor
5
20
Very poor
2
8
25
100
Good
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.10
Percentage of respondents Percentage of respondents 50
44
40 30 20
20
16 12 8
10 0 Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very poor
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 16 percentage of the respondents rate the place of training as excellent. Whereas 44 percentage of the respondents rate as good. While 12 percentage of the respondents rates average, 20 percentage of the respondents rates poor. Remaining 8 percentage of the respondents rate it as very poor.
4.11 Opinion of employees about whether the objectives of training programs were clearly defined 4.11. The table showing opinion of employees about whether the objectives of training programs were clearly defined Table No.4.11 Choice
No of respondents
Clearly defined
Percentage of respondents 3
12
Not defined
10
40
Defined to certain extend
12
48
Total
25
100
Source: Primary data Fig 4.11
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 To great extent
To some extent
Not at all
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 12 percentage of the employees had an opinion that objectives are clearly defined. While 40 percentage of the employees had an opinion that objectives are not defined. Remaining 48 percentage of the employees had an opinion that objectives are defined to certain extend.
4.12 Response of instructor to employees doubts 4.12. The table shows the opinion of employees about the response of instructor to employees doubts Table No.4.12 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Often
2
8
Sometimes
3
12
Seldom
6
24
Never
14
56
Total
25
100
Source: Primary data Fig.4.12
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0
Often
Sometimes
Seldom
Never
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the employees opined that often instructor’s response to their doubts. While 12 percentages of them opined that sometimes instructor’s response to their doubts and 24 percentage opined that seldom instructors response to their doubts. Remaining 56 percentage opined instructors never give response to their doubts.
4.13 Feedback 4.13. The table shows the opinion of employees about the feedback taken after training Table No4.13 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree
2
8
Agree
5
20
Neutral
2
8
Disagree
13
52
3
12
25
100
Strongly disagree Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.13
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40
30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that feedback are taken after training session. Whereas 20 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 8 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 52 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 12 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.14 Feed back in evaluating training effectiveness 4.14. The table shows the opinion of employees about feedback can evaluate training effectiveness Table No.4.14 Choice
No of respondents
Strongly agree
Percentage of respondents 7
28
Agree
10
40
Neutral
4
16
Disagree
3
12
Strongly disagree
1
4
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.14
Percentage of respondents 45 40 35 30 25 Percentage of respondents
20 15 10 5 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 28 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that feedback can evaluate the effectiveness of training. Whereas 40 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 12 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.15 Efficiency of trained employees 4.15. The table shows the opinion of the employees about the efficiency of trained employees Table No 4.15 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
21
84
No
4
16
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.15 80 70
60 50 Yes
40
No
30 20 10 0 No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 84 percentage of the respondents agree that trained employees are more efficient than non trained employees and 16 percentage of the respondents have a disagreement.
4.16 Barriers to training 4.16. The table shows the barriers to training based on the opinion of employees Table No.16 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Time
7
28
Money
4
16
Lack of interest of employees
3
12
trainers
5
20
Others
6
24
Total
25
100
Non availability of skilled
Source: Primary data Fig.4.16
Percentage of respondents 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Percentage of respondents Time
Money
Lack of Non interest of availability employees of skilled trainers
Others
Interpretation: From the above figure it can be seen that 28 percentage of the respondents say that time is a barrier for training. Whereas 16 percentage say that money is the barrier. While 12 percentage of the respondent says that lack of interest from the part of employees is the barrier, 20 percentage of the respondents say that non availability of skilled trainers is a barrier. Remaining 24 percentage of the employees state some other reasons.
4.17 Motivation level 4.17. The table shows the opinion of employee about training helps in increasing motivational level. Table No 4.17 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
18
72
No
7
28
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.17 80 70 60 50
Yes
40
No
30 20 10 0 No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 72 percentage of the respondents agree that training helps in increase motivational level and 28 percentage of the respondents have a disagreement.
4.18 Appraisal given to employees 4.18 The table shows the opinion of employee about the appraisal given as a motivation for attending training Table No.4.18 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
To great extent
2
8
To some extent
9
36
Not at all
14
56
Total
25
100
Source: Primary data Fig.4.18
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 To great extent
To some extent
Not at all
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the respondents are given appraisal to great extent. While 36 percentage of the respondents are given appraisal to some extent and remaining 56 percentage of respondent not at all received appraisal.
4.19 Need of additional training programme 4.19. The table shows the opinion of employees about the need of additional training programme Table No.4.19 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
16
64
No
9
36
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.19 70 60 50 40
Yes 30
No
20 10 0
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 64 percentage of the employees need an additional training and 36 percentage of the employees don’t need it.
4.20 Complaints about training session 4.20. The table shows about the complaints with regards to training session. Table No 4.20 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Take away precious time of employees
12
48
5
20
unplanned
6
24
Boring and useless
2
8
25
100
Too many gaps between the session Training sessions are
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.20
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30 Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Take away Too many Training precious time gaps between sessions are of employees the session unplanned
Boring and unuseful
Interpretation: From the above figure it is understand that 48 percentage of the respondents’ complaints about the time consumption.20 percentage of the respondents’ complaints about the time gap between each session. While 24 percentage of the respondents complaints that training sessions are unplanned and the remaining 8 percentage complaints that training sessions are boring and useless.
4.1 Training programme attended by employees 4.1 The table showing the training programmes attended by the employees Table No. 4.1 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Upto 2
14
56
3 to 5
8
32
6 to 8
2
8
8 to 10
1
4
25
100
Total Sources: Primary data Fig.4.1
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Upto 2
3 to 5
6 to 8
8 to 10
Interpretation: From the above figure it can be found out that 56 percentage of the employees had attended upto 2 training programmes .Whereas 32 percentage of the employees had attended 3 to 5 training programme. While 8 percentage of the employees had attended 6 to 8 training programmes. Remaining 4 percentage of the employees had attended 8 to 10 training programmes.
4.2 Training method undergone by employees 4.2 The table showing the training method undergone by the employees Table No.4.2 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Job rotation
15
60
Coaching
7
28
Job instructional technique
2
8
Apprenticeship
1
4
25
100
Total Sources: Primary data Fig 4.2
Percentage of respondents Percentage of respondents 70
60
60 50 40
28
30 20
8
10
4
0 Job rotation
Coaching
Job instructional technique
Apprenticeship
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 60 percentage of the employees had undergone job rotation. Whereas 28 percentage of the employee had undergone coaching. While 8 percentage of the employees had undergone job instructional technique. Remaining 4 percentage of the employees had undergone apprenticeship method of training.
4.3 Person to whom training is provided 4.3 The table showing the opinion employees about to whom the training is provided in Milco Table No.4.3 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
20
80
No
5
20
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig 4.3 90 80 70 60 50
yes
40
no
30 20 10 0
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 80 percentage of the respondents agree that the training is given to new employees and 20 percentage of employees have disagreement.
4.4 Training in improving skills 4.4 The table showing the opinion of the employees about training improves skill. Table No.4.4 Choice
No of respondents
Strongly agree
Percentage of respondents 11
44
Agree
7
28
Neutral
4
16
Disagree
2
8
Strongly disagree
1
4
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig 4.4
Percentage of respondents 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 44 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that training improves the skill. Whereas 28 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 8 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.5 Number of training programmes organised for workers 4.5. The table showing the opinion of employees about the number of training programmes organised for workers are sufficient. Table No. 4.5 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree
2
8
Agree
3
12
Neutral
5
20
Disagree
8
32
Strongly disagree
7
28
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig 4.5
Percentage of respondents 35 30 25 20 Percentage of respondents
15 10 5 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that training programmes organised for employees are sufficient. Whereas 12 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 20 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 32 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 28 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.6 Effectiveness of training programme 4.6. The table showing the opinion of employees about the participation of workers in training programme would help increase its effectiveness
Table No. 4.6 Choice
No of respondents
Strongly agree
Percentage of respondents 12
48
Agree
6
24
Neutral
4
16
Disagree
2
8
Strongly disagree
1
4
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig 4.6
Percentage of respondents 50 40
30 Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 48 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that participation of employees in training programme increase its effectiveness. Whereas 24 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 8 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.7 Absenteeism 4.7 Do you agree that training and development helps to reduce absenteeism. Table No. 4.7 Choice
No. of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
17
68
No
8
32
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig. 4.7 80 70 60 50
Yes
40
No
30 20 10 0 No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 68 percentage of the respondents agree that absenteeism is reduced through training and development and 32 percentage of the respondents have a disagreement.
4.8 Productivity and performance 4.8. The table shows the opinion of employees about enhancing productivity and performance through training Table No.4.8 Choice
No of respondents
Strongly agree
Percentage of respondents 12
48
Agree
6
24
Neutral
4
16
Disagree
2
8
Strongly disagree
1
4
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.8
Percentage of respondents 50 40 30 Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 48 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that productivity and performance are enhanced through training. Whereas 24 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 8 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.9 Period of training programme 4.9. The table shows the opinion of employees about the time period of training programme Table No. 4.9 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree
5
20
Agree
4
16
Neutral
6
24
Disagree
8
32
Strongly disagree
2
8
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.9
Percentage of respondents 35 30 25 20 Percentage of respondents
15 10 5 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 20 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that time period of the training programme was sufficient. Here 16 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 24 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 32 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 8 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.10 Place of training 4.10. The table shows the rating given to the place of training Table No.10 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Excellent
4
16
11
44
Average
3
12
Poor
5
20
Very poor
2
8
25
100
Good
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.10
Percentage of respondents Percentage of respondents 50
44
40 30 20
20
16 12 8
10 0 Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very poor
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 16 percentage of the respondents rate the place of training as excellent. Whereas 44 percentage of the respondents rate as good. While 12 percentage of the respondents rates average, 20 percentage of the respondents rates poor. Remaining 8 percentage of the respondents rate it as very poor.
4.11 Opinion of employees about whether the objectives of training programs were clearly defined 4.11. The table showing opinion of employees about whether the objectives of training programs were clearly defined Table No.4.11 Choice
No of respondents
Clearly defined
Percentage of respondents 3
12
Not defined
10
40
Defined to certain extend
12
48
Total
25
100
Source: Primary data Fig 4.11
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 To great extent
To some extent
Not at all
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 12 percentage of the employees had an opinion that objectives are clearly defined. While 40 percentage of the employees had an opinion that objectives are not defined. Remaining 48 percentage of the employees had an opinion that objectives are defined to certain extend.
4.12 Response of instructor to employees doubts 4.12. The table shows the opinion of employees about the response of instructor to employees doubts Table No.4.12 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Often
2
8
Sometimes
3
12
Seldom
6
24
Never
14
56
Total
25
100
Source: Primary data Fig.4.12
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0
Often
Sometimes
Seldom
Never
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the employees opined that often instructor’s response to their doubts. While 12 percentages of them opined that sometimes instructor’s response to their doubts and 24 percentage opined that seldom instructors response to their doubts. Remaining 56 percentage opined instructors never give response to their doubts.
4.13 Feedback 4.13. The table shows the opinion of employees about the feedback taken after training Table No4.13 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree
2
8
Agree
5
20
Neutral
2
8
Disagree
13
52
3
12
25
100
Strongly disagree Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.13
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40
30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that feedback are taken after training session. Whereas 20 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 8 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 52 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 12 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.14 Feed back in evaluating training effectiveness 4.14. The table shows the opinion of employees about feedback can evaluate training effectiveness Table No.4.14 Choice
No of respondents
Strongly agree
Percentage of respondents 7
28
Agree
10
40
Neutral
4
16
Disagree
3
12
Strongly disagree
1
4
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.14
Percentage of respondents 45 40 35 30 25 Percentage of respondents
20 15 10 5 0 Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 28 percentage of the respondents strongly agree that feedback can evaluate the effectiveness of training. Whereas 40 percentage of the respondents agree to this. While 16 percentage of the respondents became neutral, 12 percentage of the respondents disagree to this. Remaining 4 percentage of the respondents have a strong disagreement.
4.15 Efficiency of trained employees 4.15. The table shows the opinion of the employees about the efficiency of trained employees Table No 4.15 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
21
84
No
4
16
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.15 80 70
60 50 Yes
40
No
30 20 10 0 No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 84 percentage of the respondents agree that trained employees are more efficient than non trained employees and 16 percentage of the respondents have a disagreement.
4.16 Barriers to training 4.16. The table shows the barriers to training based on the opinion of employees Table No.16 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Time
7
28
Money
4
16
Lack of interest of employees
3
12
trainers
5
20
Others
6
24
Total
25
100
Non availability of skilled
Source: Primary data Fig.4.16
Percentage of respondents 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Percentage of respondents Time
Money
Lack of Non interest of availability employees of skilled trainers
Others
Interpretation: From the above figure it can be seen that 28 percentage of the respondents say that time is a barrier for training. Whereas 16 percentage say that money is the barrier. While 12 percentage of the respondent says that lack of interest from the part of employees is the barrier, 20 percentage of the respondents say that non availability of skilled trainers is a barrier. Remaining 24 percentage of the employees state some other reasons.
4.17 Motivation level 4.17. The table shows the opinion of employee about training helps in increasing motivational level. Table No 4.17 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
18
72
No
7
28
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.17 80 70 60 50
Yes
40
No
30 20 10 0 No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 72 percentage of the respondents agree that training helps in increase motivational level and 28 percentage of the respondents have a disagreement.
4.18 Appraisal given to employees 4.18 The table shows the opinion of employee about the appraisal given as a motivation for attending training Table No.4.18 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
To great extent
2
8
To some extent
9
36
Not at all
14
56
Total
25
100
Source: Primary data Fig.4.18
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30
Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 To great extent
To some extent
Not at all
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 8 percentage of the respondents are given appraisal to great extent. While 36 percentage of the respondents are given appraisal to some extent and remaining 56 percentage of respondent not at all received appraisal.
4.19 Need of additional training programme 4.19. The table shows the opinion of employees about the need of additional training programme Table No.4.19 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Yes
16
64
No
9
36
25
100
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.19 70 60 50 40
Yes 30
No
20 10 0
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Interpretation: The above figure shows that 64 percentage of the employees need an additional training and 36 percentage of the employees don’t need it.
4.20 Complaints about training session 4.20. The table shows about the complaints with regards to training session. Table No 4.20 Choice
No of respondents
Percentage of respondents
Take away precious time of employees
12
48
5
20
unplanned
6
24
Boring and useless
2
8
25
100
Too many gaps between the session Training sessions are
Total Source: Primary data Fig.4.20
Percentage of respondents 60 50 40 30 Percentage of respondents
20 10 0 Take away Too many Training precious time gaps between sessions are of employees the session unplanned
Boring and unuseful
Interpretation: From the above figure it is understand that 48 percentage of the respondents’ complaints about the time consumption.20 percentage of the respondents’ complaints about the time gap between each session. While 24 percentage of the respondents complaints that training sessions are unplanned and the remaining 8 percentage complaints that training sessions are boring and useless.
Related Documents
Chapter
May 2020 60
Chapter
November 2019 76
Chapter
October 2019 79
Chapter Five Chapter Five
July 2020 48
Chapter 1 - Chapter 2
June 2020 62
Ardhaviram_chapter11_evaj_last Chapter
April 2020 0More Documents from ""
Chapter Iv.docx
April 2020 0
Chapter I.docx
May 2020 3
Questionnaire.docx
April 2020 0
Chapter Ii.docx
April 2020 1
Time Saving Tips
October 2019 4