CHAPTER III Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation This chapter shows the results, analysis of data, Interpretation of findings and the stance of selected Grade 10 students in Jose P. Laurel Sr. High School about condom in schools by the survey questionnaire, are also presented in this chapter Profile of the respondents in terms of age and sex are shown in Table 1 and Table 2 TABLE 1 “Profile of the respondents in terms of age” Age 14-15 Years old 16-17 Years old 18 Years old and above Total
Frequency 15 19 1 35
42.86% 54.29% 2.85% 100%
TABLE 2 “Profile of the respondents in terms of sex” Sex Male Female Total
Frequency 14 21 35
Percentage 40% 60% 100%
Brand Trust
Durex Magnum 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Magnum 35
Durex 35
Trust 35
Not Aware
32
29
2
Aware
3
11
33
Total
No. of Students
35
Dental dam
Oral Not Aware Aware Gloves
Vaginal/Anal
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Statement
SA A D SD 4 10 9 12 I support the distribution of condoms in (11.43%) (28.57%) (25.71%) (25.71%)
schools because more condoms, less diseases
I approve the distribution of condoms to lessen the unwanted pregnancies Condoms should be distributed in schools for educational purposes Condoms should not be distributed in schools because of religious beliefs Distribution
of
condoms
in
schools
encourages youth to engage in pre-marital
4 18 6 (11.43%) (51.43%) (17.14%)
7 (20%)
3 (8.57%)
18 8 6 (51.43%) (22.86%) (17.14%)
3 (8.57%)
20 8 4 (57.14%) (22.86%) (11.43%)
6 16 12 (17.14%) (45.71%) (34.29%)
1 (2.86%)
9 12 11 (25.71%) (34.21%) (31.43%)
3 (8.57%)
sex Distribution of condoms changes the real meaning of sex
I don’t care about the distribution of condoms in schools even if I’m sexually
3 (8.57%)
8 9 15 (22.86%) (25.71%) (42.86%)
active I don’t care about the distribution of condoms in schools because I’m not sexually
8 13 5 9 (22.86%) (34.14%) (14.29%) (25.71%)
active I’m okay whether the distribution of condoms in schools will happen or not
9 15 4 (25.71%) (42.86%) (11.43%)
7 (20%)