Chap

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Chap as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 796
  • Pages: 17
• “...THE SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF HUMAN SOCIETY ” – SYSTEMATIC • SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE THAT FOCUSES ATTENTION ON PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR

– HUMAN SOCIETY • GROUP BEHAVIOR IS PRIMARY FOCUS; HOW GROUPS INFLUENCE INDIVIDUALS AND VICE VERSA

– AT THE “HEART OF SOCIOLOGY” • THE SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE WHICH OFFERS A RATHER UNIQUE VIEW OF SOCIETY

The Sociological Perspective

OBSERVATIONS ARE CERTAINLY IMPACTED BY THE PERSONAL PERSPECTIVES THROUGH WHICH PEOPLE COME TO VIEW THE WORLD

• THE SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE – ALLOWS YOU TO START SEEING THE GENERAL IN THE PARTICULAR • GENERAL CATEGORIES HELP SHAPE INDIVIDUALS’ LIFE EXPERIENCES

• THE SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE – ALLOWS YOU TO START SEEING THE STRANGE IN THE PARTICULAR • SOCIAL FORCES GUIDE HUMAN THOUGHT AND BEHAVIOR

WOW! NOW THAT IS COMPELLING!



COMPELLING EVIDENCE OF SOCIAL FORCES ACTING UPON HUMAN BEHAVIOR – DURKHEIM’S STUDY OF SUICIDE



MORE LIKELY TO COMMIT – MALE PROTESTANTS WHO WERE WEALTHY AND UNMARRIED HAD HIGHER SUICIDE RATES



LESS LIKELY TO COMMIT – MALES JEWS AND CATHOLICS WHO WERE POOR AND MARRIED



ONE OF THE BASIC FINDINGS: WHY? – THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THESE GROUPS HAD TO DO WITH “SOCIAL INTEGRATION” • THOSE WITH STRONG SOCIAL TIES HAD LESS CHANCE OF COMMITING SUICIDE

OTHER WAYS SOCIOLOGY ALLOWS US TO SEE ANEW • SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL MARGINALITY – SOME PEOPLE CAN BE REFERRED TO AS “OUTSIDERS” • NOT PART OF THE DOMINANT GROUP

– THE LARGER THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DOMINANT GROUP AND A MARGINAL GROUP • EASIER TO NOTICE MARGINALITY AND SUFFER FROM IT

• SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL CRISIS – CONFRONTING SOCIAL PROBLEMS ALLOWS PEOPLE TO LOOK BEYOND THEIR OWN LIVES AND SEE HOW VARIOUS SYSTEMS IMPACT THEM

• IMPORTANCE OF THESE ITEMS – THEY ALLOW US TO SEE BOTH THE SMALL AND THE LARGE PICTURE • WE BEGIN TO APPRECIATE THE INTERACTION BETWEEN MICRO AND MACRO ELEMENTS OF SOCIAL LIFE

GLOBAL LINKAGE • SOCIOLOGY OFFERS STUDENTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO UNDERSTAND THE GLOBAL VILLAGE – ALL SOCIETIES ARE INCREASINGLY CONNECTED THROUGH TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS – MANY SOCIAL PROBLEMS FACED BY AMERICANS ARE MORE SERIOUS ELSEWHERE • IMMIGRANTS STILL SEE AMERICA AS A VISION OF HOPE AND A LAND OF GREAT OPPORTUNITIES

– UNDERSTANDING GLOBAL ISSUES AND THE WORLD AROUND AMERICA ALLOWS STUDENTS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THEMSELVES • LEARNING TO SEE THE MANY SIMILARITIES • ACCEPTING AND APPRECIATING THE DIFFERENCES

• CHALLENGES FAMILIARITY – IDEALISM VERSUS REALITY OF SITUATIONS FOR PEOPLE

• BROADENS PERSONAL VIEWS – SEE OUR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOMS AND POWERFUL CONSTRAINTS

• EMPOWERS PEOPLE – FORCES STUDENTS TO ENGAGE THE WORLD

• RECOGNIZES SOCIAL DIVERSITY – UNDERSTANDING CAN LEAD TO ACCEPTANCE AND TOLERANCE

THE DISCIPLINE’S ORIGINS • EARLY IN THE 19TH CENTURY, WESTERN EUROPEAN SOCIETY EXPERIENCED MAJOR CHANGES IN MANY SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS • SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION – SCIENCE REPLACING TRADITIONAL FORMS OF AUTHORITY • GREAT AMOUNT OF CONFUSION, FEAR, AND CHAOS

• ECONOMIC REVOLUTION – CAPITALISM CHANGING THE FACE OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS • EXTREME CHANGES IN FAMILY FORM; URBAN GROWTH

• POLITICAL REVOLUTION – LIBERTY, EQUALITY, AND BROTHERHOOD • VIOLENCE, DISORDER, AND POLITICAL FIGHTS FOR CONTROL

PERSONALITIES

• AUGUSTE COMTE (1798-1857) – POSITIVISM; LAW OF THREE STAGES

• HARRIET MARTINEAU (1802-1876) – FOCUS ON WOMEN’S RIGHTS

• KARL MARX (1818-1883) – CLASS CONFLICT; HUMAN STRUGGLE

• HERBERT SPENCER (1820-1903) – SOCIAL DARWINISM

• EMILE DURKHEIM (1858-1917) – GROUP FORCES; SOCIAL INTEGRATION

• JANE ADDAMS (1860-1933) – HULL HOUSE; SOCIAL WORK

• W.E.B. DU BOIS (1868-1963) – PLIGHT OF AFRICAN AMERICANS

SOCIAL PARADIGMS • THEORY: A STATEMENT OF HOW AND WHY FACTS ARE RELATED • PARADIGM: A SET OF FUNDAMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS THAT GUIDES THINKING DOW N WITH PEOP LE

ITH W UP LE P O PE

PEOPLE HOLD DIFFERING OPINIONS ABOUT THEIR SOCIAL WORLD WE ALL COME FROM DIFFERENT SOCIAL EXPERIENCES AND THEY BIAS OUR ASSUMPTIONS

STRUCTURAL -FUNCTIONALISM • ASSUMPTION: – MACRO-ORIENTED (LARGE-SCALE) PARADIGM THAT VIEWS SOCIETY AS A COMPLEX SYSTEM WHOSE PARTS WORK TOGETHER TO PROMOTE SOCIAL STABILITY

• PRINCIPLES: – SOCIAL STRUCTURE REFERS TO RELATIVELY STABLE PATTERNS OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR – SOCIAL FUNCTION REFERS TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF SOCIAL PATTERNS FOR SOCIETY • ROBERT K. MERTON’S THOUGHTS: – MANIFEST, LATENT, AND DYSFUNCTIONS

• ASSUMPTION: – ANOTHER MACRO-ORIENTED PARADIGM, BUT THIS ONE VIEWS SOCIETY AS A SYSTEM BASED ON INEQUALITY AND CONFLICT

• PRINCIPLES: – FACTORS SUCH AS RACE, SEX, CLASS, AND AGE ARE LINKED TO SOCIAL INEQUALITY – DOMINANT GROUP VS. MINORITY GROUPS • INCOMPATIBLE DIFFERENCES • SETTING UP “SOCIAL ROADBLOCKS” FOR OTHERS

SYMBOLIC INTERACTION SYMBOLIC INTERACTION IS A MICRO-ORIENTED PARADIGM, WHICH MEANS IT IS EFFECTIVELY USED WHEN ATTEMPTING TO UNDERSTAND SMALLER SCALE SOCIAL PHENOMENA

• ASSUMPTION: – THE VIEW THAT SOCIETY IS THE PRODUCT OF EVERYDAY INTERACTIONS

• PRINCIPLES: – SOCIETY IS A COMPLEX MOSAIC OF UNDERSTANDING THAT EMERGES FROM THE VERY PROCESS OF INTERACTING • GOFFMAN’S DRAMATURGICAL ANALSYIS • THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF REALITY

Related Documents

Chap
November 2019 30
Chap 1
December 2019 8
Chap 07
November 2019 3
Chap 23
November 2019 9
Chap 01
May 2020 5
Cheating Chap
November 2019 40