Business Law_misrep And Mistake

  • Uploaded by: anant_zawar
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Business Law_misrep And Mistake as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 806
  • Pages: 27
Business Law Spring 2009

Copyright © Daniel E. O’Connell

 Terms vs. Representations  Misrepresentation  Mistake

2

Vitiating factors is the technical term for the things which make a contract void or voidable These things are:  Mistake  Misrepresentation  Duress  Undue influence  Public policy 

3

 Terms

are part of the contract

 Breach of term is a breach of contract,

allowing the remedies for breach of contract

 Representations

are not

(other statements)

 Misrepresentations don’t allow remedies

for breach of contract  They make the contract voidable

4



Oral statement/ written contract - a representation



Oral contract  Strong statements are likely to be terms  Weak statements are likely to be

representations  Important statements are likely terms 

Knowledge and skill of the parties  Depends on the level of skill or knowledge 5

A

misrepresentation is a false statement which persuades someone to enter into a contract

 The

contract is then voidable

 Misrepresentation has 3 parts  A statement  About a fact  Which causes the party to enter into the

contract

6

 Opinions

are not facts

 Opinions

made by someone with superior knowledge can be misrepresentations

 The

statement has to be one of the reasons for entering into the contract 7

 Silence

cannot be a misrepresentation, unless:  There is a change of circumstances  An insurance contract is involved  A fiduciary relationship is involved  Silence makes another statement

misleading

8

 There

are 3 types of misrepresentation  Fraudulent misrepresentation  Negligent misrepresentation  Innocent misrepresentation

9

A

person intentionally makes a false statement  Fraudulent misrepresentation involves a statement by one party:  That they know is untrue;  That they don’t believe is true; or  That they recklessly disregard

whether it’s true or not

10

 Rescission

and damages for the tort of deceit  Must bring an action within a reasonable time after discovering the misrepresentation

11

A

person makes a statement they believe to be true, but they have no reasonable basis for believing it to be true

 Remedies

damages

are rescission and

 Action

must be brought within a reasonable time after the misrepresentation is made 12



A person makes a statement believing it to be true, and has good reasons for believing that



This could be because the seller had been persuaded to make a contract by the same misrepresentation



Remedies for innocent misrepresentation are simply rescission



BUT, under the Misrepresentation Act of 1967, courts may apply contract damages if rescission would be unfair 13

A

party may lose its right to rescind a contract for misrepresentation if:  The contract is affirmed  A third party acquires rights  The subject matter of the contract no

longer exists

14

 There

are 3 kinds of mistake:

 Common mistake  Mutual mistake  Unilateral mistake

15

 This

is where both parties to the contract share the same mistake about the circumstances surrounding the agreement

16

Common mistakes are:  Mistake as to the existence of goods  Mistakes as to quality

17



This mistake occurs when the subject of the contract no longer exists but the parties don’t know that when they make the contract



The goods must be specific goods



The contract is void

18

 Courts

are unwilling to make a contract void because of a mistake about the quality of the subject of the contract

19

 Cross

purposes  Mistakes as to terms  Mistakes as to the identity of a person

20

 A mutual misunderstanding  Two parties have different views

about the same situation

21

 One

party is mistaken about some important fact relating to the contract, and the other party knows that

 These

contracts will be void unless the mistake is one of quality

22

 This

is where one party is making a mistake about the identity of the other party

 The

contract is void if:

 The parties didn’t meet face to face  The mistake is one of identity, not

attributes 23

 Many

cases of unilateral mistake also involve misrepresentation

 However,

it is important to decide whether unilateral mistake is involved

 This

is because unilateral mistake makes the contract void, void but misrepresentation only makes the contract voidable 24

 Contracts

made under duress are

voidable  Duress  Physical threat  Economic threat

25

A

party with a particular position of power or authority makes a contract with another  Doctor-patient  Lawyer-client

 Court

presumes undue influence occurred unless the dominant party proves otherwise 26

 Undue

influence may occur outside of the previous relationships  Person alleging undue influence must prove that it occurred

27

Related Documents

Toboco's Mistake
October 2019 14
Einstein Mistake
April 2020 5
Christians Mistake
June 2020 6
Same Mistake
October 2019 19