Business Law Spring 2009
Copyright © Daniel E. O’Connell
Terms vs. Representations Misrepresentation Mistake
2
Vitiating factors is the technical term for the things which make a contract void or voidable These things are: Mistake Misrepresentation Duress Undue influence Public policy
3
Terms
are part of the contract
Breach of term is a breach of contract,
allowing the remedies for breach of contract
Representations
are not
(other statements)
Misrepresentations don’t allow remedies
for breach of contract They make the contract voidable
4
Oral statement/ written contract - a representation
Oral contract Strong statements are likely to be terms Weak statements are likely to be
representations Important statements are likely terms
Knowledge and skill of the parties Depends on the level of skill or knowledge 5
A
misrepresentation is a false statement which persuades someone to enter into a contract
The
contract is then voidable
Misrepresentation has 3 parts A statement About a fact Which causes the party to enter into the
contract
6
Opinions
are not facts
Opinions
made by someone with superior knowledge can be misrepresentations
The
statement has to be one of the reasons for entering into the contract 7
Silence
cannot be a misrepresentation, unless: There is a change of circumstances An insurance contract is involved A fiduciary relationship is involved Silence makes another statement
misleading
8
There
are 3 types of misrepresentation Fraudulent misrepresentation Negligent misrepresentation Innocent misrepresentation
9
A
person intentionally makes a false statement Fraudulent misrepresentation involves a statement by one party: That they know is untrue; That they don’t believe is true; or That they recklessly disregard
whether it’s true or not
10
Rescission
and damages for the tort of deceit Must bring an action within a reasonable time after discovering the misrepresentation
11
A
person makes a statement they believe to be true, but they have no reasonable basis for believing it to be true
Remedies
damages
are rescission and
Action
must be brought within a reasonable time after the misrepresentation is made 12
A person makes a statement believing it to be true, and has good reasons for believing that
This could be because the seller had been persuaded to make a contract by the same misrepresentation
Remedies for innocent misrepresentation are simply rescission
BUT, under the Misrepresentation Act of 1967, courts may apply contract damages if rescission would be unfair 13
A
party may lose its right to rescind a contract for misrepresentation if: The contract is affirmed A third party acquires rights The subject matter of the contract no
longer exists
14
There
are 3 kinds of mistake:
Common mistake Mutual mistake Unilateral mistake
15
This
is where both parties to the contract share the same mistake about the circumstances surrounding the agreement
16
Common mistakes are: Mistake as to the existence of goods Mistakes as to quality
17
This mistake occurs when the subject of the contract no longer exists but the parties don’t know that when they make the contract
The goods must be specific goods
The contract is void
18
Courts
are unwilling to make a contract void because of a mistake about the quality of the subject of the contract
19
Cross
purposes Mistakes as to terms Mistakes as to the identity of a person
20
A mutual misunderstanding Two parties have different views
about the same situation
21
One
party is mistaken about some important fact relating to the contract, and the other party knows that
These
contracts will be void unless the mistake is one of quality
22
This
is where one party is making a mistake about the identity of the other party
The
contract is void if:
The parties didn’t meet face to face The mistake is one of identity, not
attributes 23
Many
cases of unilateral mistake also involve misrepresentation
However,
it is important to decide whether unilateral mistake is involved
This
is because unilateral mistake makes the contract void, void but misrepresentation only makes the contract voidable 24
Contracts
made under duress are
voidable Duress Physical threat Economic threat
25
A
party with a particular position of power or authority makes a contract with another Doctor-patient Lawyer-client
Court
presumes undue influence occurred unless the dominant party proves otherwise 26
Undue
influence may occur outside of the previous relationships Person alleging undue influence must prove that it occurred
27