Beirut Spine Conference May 14th 2005 Minimally-invasive Spine Surgery
1
Update on Artificial Disc Replacement B. Poffyn G. Sys K. Van der Donckt P. Verstraete D. Uyttendaele 2
Target of therapy in Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
3
Pain Relief Preservation of Range of Motion Segmental Stabilisation and Replication of the Natural Function of the Disc
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
4
Indications 1. Symptomatic DDD in young patients (<50 years) * Neg or Pos Modic signs on MRI * > 6 months unsuccessful conservative treatment * Backpain of discogenic origin confirmed by history and radiografic studies 3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
5
MRI
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
6
Discography
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
7
• Foraminal Stenosis ? • Ideal Indication Monosegmental lumbar symptomatic DDD without herniation with an average disc height > 5 mm
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
8
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
9
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
10
• Good Indication * Bisegmental lumbar DDD without herniation with an average disc height > 5 mm
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
11
* Failed disc surgery syndrome without laminectomy or severe facetalterations
* Spondylolysis after lytic repair 3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
12
• Borderline Indication * Post fusion adjacent level instabilities * 3 - level instabilities
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
13
CASE 1 - VB, woman 29 y - L4-L5 herniation - discectomy dec. 99 - chronic low back pain with antalgic posture - interference ADL
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
14
CASE 1 - VB, woman 29 y - operation date 31/10/00 - disc prosthesis L4-L5 - no complications - good subjective status at 6 months follow-up
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
15
CASE 2 - AR, man 40 y - discectomy L5-S1 1990 - chronic low back pain - NMR black disc at L4-L5 - positive discography L4-L5
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
16
CASE 2 - AR , man 40 y - operation date 08/05/01 - disc prothesis L4-L5 - no post-op complications
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
17
CASE 3 - Female - Low Back pain with several periods of lumbago •
Postoperative X-Rays
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
18
CASE 4
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
19
CASE 4
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
20
Contraindications
Absolute contraindications Translational Significant
instability
facetarthrosis
Hypertrophic facet Recessus
stenosis (option for fusion)
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
21
Contraindications –Spondylolisthesis •Degenerative •Isthmic
–Metabolic
Bone diseases Osteoporosis –Neurological and Neuromuscular diseases
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
22
Contraindications –Infection
–Tumor
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
23
Contraindications –Spinal
canal stenosis
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
24
Contraindications –Spinal
deformity –Radiculopathy
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
25
Contraindications –>
50 years
•Quality
of subchondral bone decreases
with age •Facet joint degeneration increases •Large blood vessels must be mobilised –Risk
thrombosis or stenosis increases –(smokers)
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
26
Contraindications
Relative Contraindications Post
op segment ?
Psychological Socio
factors
– economic factors
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
27
Biomechanics
With a SB Charité Artificial Disc the load is transmitted from one vertebra to the next via the cobalt-chrome Endplates encasing an UHMW Polyethylene Core between their highly polished interfaces. 3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
28
Biomechanics The Endplates and the Sliding Cores Size 5 4 3 2 1 7.5
9.5 11.5 Height / mm
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
29
Biomechanics - Core provides cushioning and spacing required during flexion , extension and torsion - Anchoring teeth on the endplates grip the bone of the endplates
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
30
Biomechanics After 20 million cycles = 20 years of life , the SB prosthesis was still efficient with 10 % less height of the polyethylene core and increase of its width
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
31
Biomechanics
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
32
Biomechanics Axial rotation Y-axis
1 2 The opposite Zygapophysial joint is gapped.
As the posterior elements swing around, the right inferior articular process of the upper vertebra impacts the superior articular process of the lower vertebra.
1 Bogduk, Nikolai: „Functional Anatomy of the Disc and Lumbar Spine“, The Artificial Disc, 2001
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
33
Biomechanics Relation of Facets to Disc - from various studies “Facet loads were more sensitive to the anteposterior location of the artifiacial disc than to the amount of anulus removed.“ 1 “Biomechanical and histologic studies have highlighted the close functional relationship between lumbar discs and their associated facet joints, and it is conceivable that their degenerative changes are interdependent.“ 2 1 Dooris AP et al: Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 2001 Mar 15; 26(6):E122-129 2 Gries NC et al: Early histologic changes in lower lumbar discs and facet joints and their correlation. Eur Spine J 2000 Feb; 9(1):23-29
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
34
Biomechanics Relation of Facets to Disc - from various studies “It has been reported that facet arthrosis and degeneration never occur without the presence of adjacent disc degeneration. This suggests that intact discs protect the facets from severe loading and degeneration.“ 1
1 Haher TR et al: The role of the lumbar facet joints in spinal stability. Identification of alternative paths of loading. Spine 1994 Dec 1; 19(23):2667-2670
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
35
Biomechanics The “Mobile Sliding Core“ Artificial Disc ... in it‘s degree of mobility
a)
b)
defines the required interaction between soft tissues (a), facet joints (b) and implant geometry to maintain a stable articulation ... 3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
36
Biomechanics Axes of Rotation
X-axis X-axis: sagittal rotation (flexion and extension) Y-axis: axial rotation Z-axis: lateral bending Z-axis 1 Bogduk, Nikolai: „Functional Anatomy of the Disc and Lumbar Spine“, The Artificial Disc, 2001
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005 Y-axis Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
37
Biomechanics Translation Force
Motion + + + -
Z Z Y Y X X
translation - Forward slide or glide translation - Backward slide translation - Longitudinal or axial distraction translation - Longitudinal or axial compression translation - Left axial rotation translation - right axial rotation
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
38
Biomechanics
Vertebrae loaded in Flexion Fixed inferior component
Sliding intermediate component
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
39
Biomechanics
Vertebrae loaded in Extension Fixed inferior component
Sliding intermediate component
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
40
Biomechanics Correct Placement
Sagittal Plane
Frontal Plane
Disc is major compression carrying component 1 Nucleus in lumbar spine is nearer to the disc’s posterior surface 2
Center of Prosthesis = Center of Intervertebral Space Center A/P
Center M/L MRI Image Intensifier / Sizing Gauge Center of Nucleus
Image Intensifier / Sizing Gauge
Center of Prosthesis
Center of Prosthesis ≈ Center of Nucleus ≈ 2 mm dorsal of saggital vertebral midline
1 White, Panjabi: „Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine“ pg. 4 2 Gray‘s Anatomy 1995, pg. 513
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
41
Biomechanics
Important: Use oblique endplates to maintain or restore lumbar lordosis Although literature reflects no association of lumbar lordosis with back pain, it is preferable to maintain respectively restore lumbar lordosis when implanting the Intervertebral Disc Endoprosthesis: 1) Load on Sliding Core should be distributed equally
Endplate to Sliding Core = parallel 2)
As 80% of lumbar lordosis occurs through wedging of Intervertebral Disc (and only 20% because of lordotic configuration of vertebral bodies) normal lordosis should be restored when implanting the Disc Endoprosthesis.
To maintain or restore normal lumbar biomechanics.
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
Beirut Spine conference May 14th 2005
42
3rd Dubai Spine Conference March 10th 2005
43