in drawing the conclusion that , <xyz> uses the anecdotal evidence and several unfounded assumptions. these unsubstantiated assumptions, along with the flaws in the reasoning, leave the argument less persuasive and weak. the first questionable assumption stems from . for example, ... the second assumption that leaves the possibility for open. additionally, the logic that <... blah blah ...> is weak because . the argument could be strengthened by . however, if the information is the arguement falls apart. as a result of the caveats in the premises and assumptions, the argument that is weak. before making a decision to , <xyz> must consider .