Appeasement & Neville Chamberlain: By And
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Appeasement & Neville Chamberlain: By And as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 363
- Pages: 8
Appeasement & Neville Chamberlain by Daniel B and George B
Defining the word "Appeasement" Neville Chamberlain was that posh Prime Minister we had a while back that liked waving paper around. He also liked appeasing Germany. Google's definition: "The state of being appeased; the policy of giving in to demands in order to preserve the peace" This didn't work with Hitler - he thought he could walk all over Europe!
I is well kool LMAOROFL!
Background to Appeasement The most famous account is of the lead up to WW2 where Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler to try and prevent war. Firtsly: • Hitler joined with Austria in Anschluss • Then he remilitarized the Rhineland • He then took the Sudetenland of I haz mustachio! Czechoslavakia Lolzor!!!!?!!!111 • And finally conquered it
Reasons for Appeasement • People felt sympathy for Germany • People had a desire for peace as they could still remember WW1. • There was a threat of Communism from Russia and they didn't want to ally with them. • Many countries, especially Britain, needed time to re-arm. I iz well a k00l flagz, iz will like stab ya an d3n hit ya!!?!1
Reasons against Appeasement There are many things wrong with appeasement such as: • It is only very short term • The rest of the world misjudged Hitler, they thought he was rational • And it is morally wrong, they o NO3Z! 1 is gunna allowed Germany to break exPLODZ!?!?!?!11 treaties.
Historical interpretations of Appeasement Traditionalist - Cato (1940-50) Thought appeasement was wrong and suckish. Revisionist - AJP Taylor (1950) He thought appeasement was the best option at the time. Counter Revisionist - McDonough (1990) Thought appeasement was the only option, but it wasn't done very well.
Links for Further Reading Here are some links for further reading:
• This first link, is a trusted website by an online historian called John Simkin. You will find the background to appeasement and an explanation of the times.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWappeasement.htm
• This link is to the GCSE bitesize webite and contains the vital information.
http:/www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/history/mwh/ir1/chamberlainandappeasementrev1.shtml
• This link is to wikipedia, and so may contain wrong information, so becareful and double check it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeasement
Defining the word "Appeasement" Neville Chamberlain was that posh Prime Minister we had a while back that liked waving paper around. He also liked appeasing Germany. Google's definition: "The state of being appeased; the policy of giving in to demands in order to preserve the peace" This didn't work with Hitler - he thought he could walk all over Europe!
I is well kool LMAOROFL!
Background to Appeasement The most famous account is of the lead up to WW2 where Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler to try and prevent war. Firtsly: • Hitler joined with Austria in Anschluss • Then he remilitarized the Rhineland • He then took the Sudetenland of I haz mustachio! Czechoslavakia Lolzor!!!!?!!!111 • And finally conquered it
Reasons for Appeasement • People felt sympathy for Germany • People had a desire for peace as they could still remember WW1. • There was a threat of Communism from Russia and they didn't want to ally with them. • Many countries, especially Britain, needed time to re-arm. I iz well a k00l flagz, iz will like stab ya an d3n hit ya!!?!1
Reasons against Appeasement There are many things wrong with appeasement such as: • It is only very short term • The rest of the world misjudged Hitler, they thought he was rational • And it is morally wrong, they o NO3Z! 1 is gunna allowed Germany to break exPLODZ!?!?!?!11 treaties.
Historical interpretations of Appeasement Traditionalist - Cato (1940-50) Thought appeasement was wrong and suckish. Revisionist - AJP Taylor (1950) He thought appeasement was the best option at the time. Counter Revisionist - McDonough (1990) Thought appeasement was the only option, but it wasn't done very well.
Links for Further Reading Here are some links for further reading:
• This first link, is a trusted website by an online historian called John Simkin. You will find the background to appeasement and an explanation of the times.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWappeasement.htm
• This link is to the GCSE bitesize webite and contains the vital information.
http:/www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/history/mwh/ir1/chamberlainandappeasementrev1.shtml
• This link is to wikipedia, and so may contain wrong information, so becareful and double check it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeasement
Related Documents
Appeasement & Neville Chamberlain: By And
April 2020 1
Appeasement: By/ Matthew J And Josh A
April 2020 9
Neville
June 2020 13
Chamberlain, Obama And Israel
May 2020 1
John Chamberlain
November 2019 6