Aom 002 Swm.docx

  • Uploaded by: Jonson Palmares
  • 0
  • 0
  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Aom 002 Swm.docx as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 2,100
  • Pages: 7
Republic of the Philippines COMMISSION ON AUDIT Local Government Sector Nueva Ecija B & Aurora - Team No. 27 ===================================================================== AOM No. 2019-002 Date: January 10, 2019 AUDIT OBSERVATION MEMORANDUM (AOM)

For:

HON. ALEXANDER A. DAUS Municipal Mayor Municipality of Laur, Nueva Ecija Attention

:

Solid Waste Management Board Municipality of Laur, Nueva Ecija

We have audited the compliance of the Municipality on the Republic Act No. 9003 or the Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 and noted the following deficiencies: The Municipality did not substantially comply with the provisions of Republic Act No. 9003 or the Solid Waste Management (SWM) Act of 2000 on the formulation and implementation of ecological solid waste management plans and programs, thus total protection of the environment and general welfare of the constituents have not been attained. Republic Act No. 9003 or Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 plays an important role in the economic transformation of a community particularly mitigating the environmental and health risks posed by uncollected and untreated garbage. Management of solid waste has always been a challenge in Municipality of Laur and one of the areas that require attention. The Local Government of Laur has made efforts both at municipal and barangay levels aimed at improving the way solid waste is managed. This has mainly been through building the capacity of local governments to ensure proper segregation, collection, transport of garbage. Despite these interventions, challenges still persist in the management of municipal solid waste. In CY 2017, the audit team conducted and submitted its observations and recommendations on the management of solid waste by the Municipality. The audit sought to ascertain the extent of compliance to which the Municipality had established in their solid waste management system to facilitate the segregation, collection, transportation and disposal of garbages within the Municipality and its component barangays. The following audit observations were noted in the audit: a. Mandatory segregation of wastes at source were not implemented b. Observation of the No Collection Policy was only partial

c. d. e.

No holding area for residual wastes that are for pick up by the service provider No identified lot that is appropriate for the establishment of Material Recovery Facility (MRF) No ordinance passed for the “No Littering,” “Segregation of Wastes at Source,” and “No segregation/No Collection” policies

From the above observations, the audit team recommended and the management agreed that the Local Chief Executive will: a. recommend to the Sangguniang Bayan the passing of ordinance/s that will define the SWM policies that are LGU-specific and shall include, among others, the (i) provision of incentives; and (iii) the declaration of certain acts as prohibited with their corresponding penalties; b. issue corresponding orders that will operationalize these policies that will cover, among others, the identification of (i) the offices concerned; (ii) their related mandates, functions and responsibilities; and (iii) the operating procedures; c. prioritize the acquisition of land to be used for MRF and as temporary holding area of Residual Containment Bins; and d. impose timelines for the implementation of SWM programs, monitor the same and address the noted lapses. For the current year, the team decided to carry out a follow up to establish the extent to which municipality had implemented the recommendations in the 2017 audit report as stated above; assess whether or not there have been other deficiencies or improvements in management of solid waste in the municipality and ascertain whether any new recommendations are needed. Thus, the progress of implementation on each recommendation is further discussed below: 1. Ordinance/s that will define the LGU-specific SWM policies In addition to the existing national legal frame work, municipal councils are expected to come up with municipal specific legal framework in the form of resolution and ordinances. These are drafted by the technical executive officers and should be comprehensive covering aspects such as collection, transportation, disposal, fees and charges, penalties and offences. Once the drafts are developed they are reviewed and submitted to council for approval. After approval by council, these drafts are submitted to the proper authority for review and confirmation that they do not conflict with any existing laws, regulations and guidelines. Once approved, these laws and ordinances are widely disseminated to create awareness and to foster compliance. We noted that there were no additional corresponding local ordinances and/or resolutions passed to implement mandate of SWM, except with the Municipality’s Environmental Code, which expressed in general terms the framework espoused by RA No. 9003. Hence, the offices concerned their related mandates, functions and responsibilities as far as SWM is concerned, and the operating procedures were not clearly identified and defined. From the foregoing, we want to remind that the institutionalization of these legal frameworks, coupled with proper awareness in community and monitoring of the

implementation of the programs, the sustainability, effectiveness and purpose of the programs could have been more successfully achieved. 2. Operational policies and procedures pertaining to SWM System This is a responsibility of the Solid Waste Management Board. The process of developing a solid waste management policy and strategy commences with undertaking an analysis of the existing situation. This is done through collecting and analysing data in addition to consultations with the local community. This data is used to come up with a draft policy which is also discussed and validated by the different stakeholders including the barangay government. This is then followed by developing an implementation strategy through which this policy will be implemented. The policy and strategy details the series of activities that will be undertaken in the short and long term. It was noted that there is still no clear-cut solid waste management policy and strategy adopted by the municipality. Interviews with one of the members of the SWM board revealed that although the process of formulating a solid waste management policy commenced in 2012, the policy is still in draft form pending the completion and approval. Thus, we reiterate that in order to achieve the short term and long term municipal solid waste management aspirations embodied in Republic Act No. 9003, municipalities should create policies and implement strategies which are aligned with the national solid waste objectives and strategies. Without an approved policy, a good solid waste management strategy cannot be developed. This will result in disjointed planning and may result in duplication of activities and hinder coordination between the key players to achieve a common national solid waste management goal. 3. Land for Materials Recovery Facility/Temporary holding are of residual containment bins Despite consistent reminders to implement and prioritize solid waste management projects and activities covered by regular appropriation, as of this writing, the Municipality still failed to build the Materials Recovery Facility as required by RA No. 9003. Management reasoned out that the non-establishment of MRF was due to difficulty in finding the appropriate lot therefor. Inasmuch as appropriation was already provided in CY 2016, which was carried forward as a continuing appropriation in CY 2017, it shall remain as such as of this writing. Further, the Municipality is using a temporary Residual Containment Bin provided by the MCSWMC that will serve as a storage facility of the collected wastes. The parties agreed that the latter will collect the residual waste of the Municipality on “on call basis” for a fee. Once the volume is already enough for pick up, the Municipal Engineer will call MCSWMC to pick up these unsegregated wastes.

Residual Containment Bin located at Brgy. Sagana, Laur, Nueva Ecija

4. Implementation and Monitoring of SWM programs Implementation of these SWM laws is done by the SWM enforcement officers identified in their 10-Year SWM Plan. Enforcement entails coming up with enforcement work plans and ensuring that the planned enforcement activities are undertaken. Accordingly, enforcement officers should also conduct periodic inspections within the municipality to ascertain if the provisions of the bylaws are being complied with. This is usually done for commercial buildings in all barangays and places such as markets, parks, where cases of non-compliance are noted, and the offenders are apprehended and penalised as obligated by the bylaws. It was observed that the current system of enforcement was not effective in supporting solid waste management objectives. Hence, the following audit observations are still noticeable: 1. Planning and budgeting Best practice requires government agencies such as Municipality of Laur to collect data about the growth of waste in the community, analyze the factors contributing to the growth of waste such as growth, industrial developments and changing consumption habits of residents to give accurate inputs for planning and budgeting purposes. We observed that Management and its divisions were not regularly updating their data base to reflect the changing environment in solid waste management. In the absence an up to date information, the Management cannot carry out a proper assessment of waste being generated in the locality and therefore do not have well researched information on solid waste for proper strategic development and decision making. Therefore, their plans and budgets were not realistic because they were not based on proper assessment of garbage generated and this resulted in failure to adequately address the challenges of garbage collection and disposal in the Municipality.

2. Mandatory segregation of wastes at source It can still be noticed that waste receptacles/bins or trash cans with markings for biodegradable and non-biodegradable for segregation were not maintained in many public areas. Even the Municipal Hall compound was observed to have limited trash cans around without marking. 3. Collection Policy adopted by the Municipality Confirmation disclosed that collections of wastes are only done by the Municipality within the public market and its nearby commercial/business establishments without definite schedule of collection as well as identified collection points. Since no collection of wastes were done from the households, the traditional practice of burning garbage on their backyard or disposed them to an uncontrolled dumpsite is still carried out.

Uncollected garbages at Brgy. III, Laur, Nueva Ecija

4. Solid Waste Management Awareness According to Republic Act No. 9003, members of the public are supposed to be educated in matters of waste management such as; sorting/separation of waste according to their categories of organic and inorganic, waste minimization and adherence to waste management laws. It was noted through interviews with households, market vendors and through documentary reviews that solid waste awareness campaigns were not conducted by Municipality. We were informed that little information about waste management was being exchanged during the local council meetings Lack of solid waste management awareness campaigns has led to unacceptable and prohibited waste management practices such as indiscriminate littering and disposal of garbage.

The above weaknesses in implementation and monitoring were attributed to nonprioritization of the programs, projects and activities through adequate planning and resource allocation. A weak system of enforcement negatively affects the effective administration of such laws and other regulations and guidelines which are critical in supporting the solid waste management function. It can be gleaned from the foregoing that the management of municipal solid waste in Laur is still a challenge as demonstrated by the majority of municipalities within the Philippines. The deficiencies noted above may result in conditions which may be prejudicial to the interest of its constituents on the aspect of public health and environmental hazards. In order to realise the broader objectives of safeguarding and promoting public health by maintaining clean towns and protecting the environment, municipalities need to prioritise management of solid waste in their short and long-term plans as well as strengthen the monitoring, supervision and enforcement mechanisms. Otherwise, the total protection of the environment and general welfare of the constituents in harmony with economic development may not be substantially attained.

We recommend that the Local Chief Executive: a) recommend to the Sangguniang Bayan the passing of ordinance/s that will define the SWM policies that are LGU-specific which are also in line with the national framework b) develop Solid Waste Management Policies & Strategy so as to align it with the current trends and developments in solid waste and environmental management. c) ensure that a database is created on all the variables in solid waste management which should be updated regularly to enhance the appropriateness of budgets. d) take appropriate action to expedite the purchase of land as well as the establishment of Materials Recovery Facility; e) impose timelines for the implementation of SWM programs, monitor the same and address the noted lapses. May we have your comments on the foregoing observation within fifteen (15) calendar days from receipt hereof.

HADIYAH A. ALIÑO OIC-Audit Team Leader

VIRGINIA A. YACAT OIC-Supervising Auditor

PROOF OF SERVICE OF COPIES OF AOM Received by Name

Position/Office

Date (Signature )

Alexander A. Daus

Municipal Mayor

Roland Corpuz

OIC-MPDC

Related Documents

Aom 002 Swm.docx
December 2019 19
Aom
November 2019 11
Aom Compliance.docx
June 2020 13
Aom Sample.doc
June 2020 7
Aom%20reg
December 2019 10
Aom-donation-101.docx
April 2020 6

More Documents from "bimbybo"