Amistad Film Critique

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Amistad Film Critique as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 812
  • Pages: 2
Amistad Film Critique

In the 1830s and 1840s, the meaning of freedom to Americans differed from person to person just as much as it does today. It varied from being a white male who owned property who was very stuck in his idea of freedom, which meant political power and being allowed to do almost anything he could imagine. Black slaves who had no freedom had their own idea also. They dreamed of one day realizing his or her idea of freedom, which was to not be a slave. Along with freedom came the issue of equality. Even thought the two are completely different, they played a part in defining

one

another.

In the 1830s and 1840s blacks were not thought of as being equal to white Europeans and so were not given freedom in some places. They were thought more of as property and certainly you can’t free your gun or your house. So how could you free a slave? It was pretty much a messed up way of thinking back then, but it was all they knew. People can and do change. Changes in how

people

thought

was

evident

in

the

movie

Amistad.

Cinque the chosen spokesman for the Africans had a vivid real idea of freedom. He wanted to go home. It’s that simple. He had been taken by force from his home and family and place in a foreign place and was being held captive for something he did not understand. He did understand that some people were obviously against him and his people. He was destined to return home and

he

would

obviously

do

anything

to

ensure

his

freedom.

In the beginning of the movie Roger Baldwin was so sure he had a can’t lose approach to winning the case. The blacks were merely property was his approach. Well it wasn’t the greatest approach but it was the defense’s approach. Though the course of the trials and visiting with the Africans Baldwin became human. He began to sort of connect with them as people and was definitely

an

abolitionist

at

the

end

of

the

movie.

John Quincy Adams was a funny fellow. He had been in government for quite some time, had been President, had old views, but this old dog learned new tricks. He at some parts of the movie looked down upon the case of the Africans. Thinking it not that important or of concern to him. He did continue to help Baldwin in his battles in the smaller court. Adams came to the rescue in the Supreme Court after further reviewing of the case and realizing as Baldwin did, that the Africans were

people

too.

As

people

they

were

entitled

to

freedom.

The Spanish government played a role of an old civilization not willing to change, under the control of an adolescent, seeking to claim it’s rightful property. The British on the other hand showed a new way of thinking by outlawing slavery and defending slaves in Sierre Leone. The British Naval Officer aided in the defense of the Africans by interpreting the log of the notorious slave

ship

that

I

can

not

recall

the

name

of.

I believe the verdict of the case in the lower court showed the compassion of that particular judge. Now for the verdict of the Supreme Court, I think the verdict was a penance or makeup for wrong

doings of the past and the start of something that needed to be corrected in the judicial way of thought

in

America.

The abolitionist in the movie portrayed as weepers and mourners in the streets around the courthouse and jail we merely for effect. To show that there were some people who knew the true meaning of freedom, the true meaning of America. I don’t think they played that much of a role in the verdict or the court’s decisions because there weren’t any references to God or a natural right or

of

any

displays

or

commotion

in

the

court

room.

I do feel that the release of the movie Amistad did have an effect on Americans. I believe it helped portray the struggles of a particular group of a large race of people who still are denied some things due to prejudice. This I’m sure made some people in this country think a little bit and maybe even be nice to the next couple of black people they ran into. I don’t however think it had a prominent impact on the way most people think or feel. Movies with content such as Amistad are usually made to help the cause of the people portrayed. So in that respect I’m sure the movie was a success in showing the black man’s struggle against the white man. I’m sure one day they’ll be a movie about the struggle to remove the rebel flag from the capitol building of certain Southern states.

Related Documents

Amistad Film Critique
November 2019 7
Amistad
May 2020 22
Amistad
June 2020 13
Amistad
June 2020 8
Amistad
May 2020 12