Almost Famous Paper

  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Almost Famous Paper as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,092
  • Pages: 3
Gabriella Berman November 5, 2009 JOUR300 Ethics: As Seen in Almost Famous Ethics in journalism and factual writing are essential for a career path in journalism for the primary reason that the public trusts the facts given by media. Because of this, it is important for the interviewer as well as the interviewee to be honest and give understandable and reliable quotations. In Almost Famous, the idea of proper interviewing and relationships between the press and the public fall under great scrutiny because of the unethical ways William gets his story and the lies presented by the band being interviewed. The ethics of a true journalist and the people surrounded him are questioned because of his demeanor around the band, the bands rebuttal to the story, and the way the story’s focus and quotes were received. Because of his actions, it is important to understand the way a journalist should truly act; and if put in the same situation, what a person should do in response. In the movie, the most important sequence of events is the in the last few scenes when William actually submits the story to Rolling Stone Magazine. This is the primary focus of ethics; however, it is important to understand the way that William acted when he was around the band. From the beginning, William tries to be professional and interview the band to get his story and leave. Once Rolling Stone Magazine gets word of William’s work, they ask him to go on the road with Stillwater, an up and coming band. While on the road, the band refers to William as “the enemy,” yet still allows him to get extremely close to them and witness what goes on when they are off the stage. Throughout the movie, William is portrayed as a journalist, but what is being shown is not the true actions a journalist would or should ever take. Because of his unprofessional behavior, he allows the band to walk all over him and deny everything he writes in his story and thus causes the magazine to drop the story and opt for another article.

The movie shows William constantly trying interview the band with his tape recorder, but the band ignoring his requests. Because of this, he has to resort to taking notes at all times he is around them and using their life as a basis for his story. William is trying to be portrayed as a professional and capable journalist, but in reality what he is doing is completely unethical because of his disregard for the band and his close personal relationship with them. The movie does, however, try and show William as being proficient by showing him with a notepad and a recording device most of the time, but to people who understand the inner workings of journalism, it is easy to see that this is not the case. The movie overall is well thought through because of the emphasis on legitimate journalistic skills and the overall tone of the piece. Though it is not stated that William is taking notes and recording the band at all times, it is shown through his constant writing and recording of the bands lives when they aren’t looking. The movie doesn’t necessarily say that William is unethically writing a play by play of the bands personal life, but it shows it through his life and his choices when he is around them. Because of this and the fact that William is a journalist, the overall tone of the movie can only be described as pragmatic; an appropriate tone, yet misleading because the basic principles of ethical journalism are constantly disregarded and ignored. When William is on the plane with the band, he is seen as interviewing one of the members, until the turbulence begins and the riders lives are put at stake. William quickly is seen moving the tape recorder, but it is not shown that he turns it off. The band had no idea that he was taping the entire time, and the movie doesn’t necessarily say whether or not this is true, but once the story is submitted, it is assumed that the interview continued whether the band knew it or not. William witnessed the band on drugs, committing adultery, and numerous other cases where ethics were put to the side. With each of these occurrences he had his pen in his hands and he took notes on everything, which would have been acceptable had the band known his

intentions from the start. In the movie, one of the band members says “just make us look cool, man” and William immaturely agrees. William has to understand that it is not in his best interest for his career path to promise this to the band member. Williams loyalty does not lie with the band (an important misconception), rather with the public and their thirst for the truth and facts of behind the scenes lifestyles of bands on the road. For the professional journalist, it is important to understand ethics and codes of conduct within this career. If a media organization says to “go on the road” with a band, the ideal way to go about this is to travel alone and stay in a hotel alone. This makes it easier to ensure that the boundaries between professionalism and friendship are not crossed and that the band knows that you are there to get a story and not look out for their wellbeing. If this simple rule is followed, then the band cannot deny any part of the story and there will be no issues with bosses and editors. In addition, rather than taking notes and recording the band when they are unaware, a journalist should always inform the interviewee that they are recording and what their intent is with the story. It is not proper to spend so much time with the band or any other subject matter because eventually the professional line is crossed, whether the journalist meant to or not. Almost Famous is an excellent portrayal of journalism during a time when ethics may not have been a top consideration, but in today’s world it is only appropriate to follow the rules and regulations of a moral code in order to ensure truthfulness and validity is always present and that facts are never sacrificed for entertainment. If a journalist stays true to fairness and ethics, there are greater chances that their stories will be a success and that they were gain the respect of their coworkers and the general public.

Related Documents

Almost Famous Paper
June 2020 5
Almost Famous
October 2019 21
Almost Poem Almost Comedy
November 2019 25
Famous
October 2019 42
Almost Paradise
May 2020 22
Almost, Ammo
December 2019 28