A Mind Is A Terrible Thing To Wastehealthy But Comatose2

  • Uploaded by: Kay Kim
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View A Mind Is A Terrible Thing To Wastehealthy But Comatose2 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 932
  • Pages: 2
A mind is a terrible thing to waste Healthy but Comatose Sane but committed In 1998 there is a movie called “COMA. In the movie there is a resident protagonist who is involved in selling organs in the international black market. When a healthy patient comes to his clinic for surgery he used carbon monoxide instead of oxygen in the surgery. As a result the patient is brain damage and becomes comatose after surgery. The body is kept in that vegetable state until the organs are harvested. The film shows what a corrupted professional will do for money. In 2008 there is another movie: “ Slumdog Millionaire.” In order to make money the thugs poured acid on the good eyes of a kid so that he will be blind and look pitiful when he begs for money in the streets. There are also many cases of Doctors performing unnecessary heart bypass operations for money. There are dentists who perform unnecessary caps and crowns on the teeth of the patients for money. The Police are involved in running prostitution rings and stealing and dealing in drug trafficking. Recently Judges are stealing money from the Court Coffers. All these crimes are documented and caught because there is evidence of their wrong doings. The mind is a terrible thing to waste. The wrong doing of a psychiatrist is harder to proof. It will be his word against the mentally challenged person. Secondly there is no scientific tests such as MRI, blood test etc to show the accuracy and correctness of his diagnostic. All his evaluation is based on an hour or more subjective appreciation of the patient. Life without parole is a very serious judgment and no Judge takes the sentencing lightly. Yet with no jury and basing on the word of a psychiatrist alone the Court can committed a person indefinably to a mental institution without a trial. Why does the court allow so much power to be vested on a psychiatrist who does his evaluation subjectively and can be motivated by other unlawful incentives? When the State commits a sane person to the mental institution against his wishes it costs the State $800 a day for the commitment. It costs only $50 a day to keep someone in jail. In the case of a murder trial the defendant wanted to plead “insanity” so that he can be spared the “death penalty.” If he finds a good psychiatrist he will be able to stay alive and be committed in the mental institution. By the same token the psychiatrist can commit a perfectly sane person to the mental institution and rake in $300,000 a year for each commitment. In Indiana alone there are more that 1750 people currently committed in the mental institutions. It costs the State more than $550 million each year to keep them in the mental institutions. Recently Dr. Parker gave the Court “permission” to commit Kay Kim to the mental institution indefinitely because according Dr. Parker there is no cure for her illness. Dr. Parker is so sure his report meets the request of the Judge that he wrote in his reply to the court: “Thank you for the opportunity to serve your court. I look forward to working with you in the future.” The last line shows his greed and desire for more business instead of putting his patient’s interest first. I do not know where to go and complaint about the corruption that has been on going for so long. I only know about Kay Kim and that she is a sane person who was provide “Security Clearance” to handle confidential documents when she was working for the Federal Government. She was also admitted to Purdue University to study computer science. She has been certified by three different State appointed psychiatrist on three different occasions (at the time of arrests) to be Double Jeapardy 1

without psychosis. She has never been convicted of any crimes. She can represent herself, Pro Se in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals (case: 09-3356) and the US District Courts (Cause #: 1:09-cv0829, 1:08-cv-1644, and 1:09-cv-1221). Why no judge in the Marion Superior Criminal Court wants to take her cases? Even the Special Judge Profiitt asked the Indiana Supreme Court to excuse her from the case. The charges are all misdemeanors. Why is the Court spending so much time and money to prevent her from getting a fair trial? Who can restore her rights to self representation? Is an indefinite involuntary commitment an unusual and too cruel a punishment for the misdemeanor charges? Dr. Parker has a personal vested interest in the prosperity of the mental health industry. It is financially beneficial for him to provide a constant flow of patients to the mental institutions. Some one must go back and review all the cases of the people he had committed into the mental institution. If there is evidence that he commits medical malpractice criminal charges should be brought and him. If there is further evidence that the Judges are also involved in the conspiracy to commit some one in a mental institution in lieu of a fair trial they should be charged criminally too. I hope I am wrong but if the foregoing criminal activities are proven someone must right the wrong and release those people who are unlawfully committed. The Psychiatrists should be brought to trial and make restitutions for their malpractice.

I affirm under oath and the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. You be the Judge.

Charles Chuang e/m: [email protected]

Related Documents


More Documents from ""