96 Son Ship, Ok

Nove mber 29, 2005 Dear Editor in Chief, Then the scholar asks the A.I to comment on always moderate vs. most of the time one step forward economy! The A.I. said: always moderate might be extreme because of the word “always.” There should be time to be moderate and time to be progressive or one step forward and sometimes a little bit back giving way to others especially for poor countries or poor people. But sometimes one should not yield but push through especially if a strong leader knows that it would give good results for the whole world. Since the scholar opposes an ultimate designer for the economic world because what if the ultimate designer is wrong and after 5 years another ultimate designer has better idea what would happen to the world. The A.I. remark: Let’s have a simple example of business representing something big or a proto type project for the whole world of economics. Since the traditional economic stimulator is food; and food would now be very cheap or almost free because of automation, man would look for other things that could drive him to move and do good and excel with high pay to consume more those products that automation built or produced. And since there are rich or very rich countries because of patent, of resources, of bright people, of savings or capital, of good attitude because of universal Word, of laws, of good cultures that push the citizens to be discipline and entrepreneurial then there would be countries that should be rich or very rich and countries that should struggle to be rich or remain poor or temporary poor now but repent and become successful; or after a while might fall again and rise again. But the meaning of poor and rich now is different because of balanced leadership, law, good teachings especially focusing on world economics or on basic necessities world wide perspective. Before, poor means eating two times a day; and rich means traveling and having dinner to a reputable restaurant once a week. Now in this balanced world, poor means eating three times a day perhaps with snacks with complete second hand home appliances and second hand car; and being rich perhaps all appliances are on the latest model; and the car is on the latest model too and the family has an opportunity to have a family dinner at a restaurant in the most prestigious place on each city or country or here on earth where most rich and glamour people gather together for their status symbol and “show of pride”. The scholar said: it might be impossible that it could be attained. Ok, then the scholar asks: if being poor could now eat three times a day with complete second hand appliances and perhaps have a second hand car, and being rich could have a picnic in the most prestigious place on earth let say it is called level-1 prosperity. Then what is level-2 prosperity? Is it that the poor can now afford to have a brand new economic car and the rich could have a dinner at a reputable restaurant on the Moon; then level 3 the dinner is now in Mars, and so on? The A.I. said: let’s just have opinions and its up for you to agree or not; or think it over again when you go to sleep; or make also your own opinion with specifics and share it to me. Then the scholar said: I’m sorry please continue about your opinion on level 1 prosperity that the food is almost free, and the poor has complete second hand appliances at home and with second hand car…! Please go on…! So the A.I. continues to give his opinion: The key is that human skill should be precious; or that the wage is high; or wage should buy many consumables. Or the key is basic food and any basic product produced or built by automation should be very cheap or almost free because robots and automation did the hard work and don’t need wages and salaries and could work night and day. Perhaps the idea where the charitable very rich people through law or the idea where almost all poor human would be given an advance of payment for his work thru incentives or be

given almost free food, almost free shelter, almost free second hand appliances, almost free second hand car, or even perhaps almost free gasoline because of robotics and because of those charitable very rich capitalists be it human or computer system that are entrepreneurs because of law and good teachings. But perhaps people might abuse the goodness of those blessed people or wealth trustee of God here on earth and the result of giving poor people almost free basics products produced by automation would lead to economic chaos instead; because people would just have “happy go lucky mentality” and would not work hard because there is food almost free. Since those-almost free basic needs are like loan or incentives, incentives could be stopped if certain good teachings, law, rules are violated. Perhaps pass law that pay slip should be through electronic transfer and should be broken into three parts: 1) basic things through automation 2) premiums on SSS, health, taxes, tithes, alms, and others thru automation 3) freewill-one could buy anything; or save. The scholar remarks, could you please explain this idea? The A.I. remarks: Perhaps almost all ordinary or poor people is now mandated to have cell phone and with personal registration number or has a National ID that could be used to transact business and could pay and receive payment. Perhaps, in the system, every time there is payment by the employer to the ordinary man, the payment is automatically divided into three parts with its specifics obligations: example 1) amortization for his basic needs, 2) premiums, tithes or alms, 3) savings. Perhaps paper bill would be discouraged and electric cash would be encouraged and be enhanced by law and good teachings. But the A.I. said: people are by nature never satisfied. Even if almost all basic things are almost free they would organize and compete for something that one is different or have some “show of pride” or different or unique than the others as long as it allowed by good teaching, by law; then things will be all right. Perhaps “almost free” mean it is still being bought so that if one would not do anything he will still starve because good teaching don’t allow it-from your sweat of your brow shall you eat; or It is like the story in the bible where the king invited all the people even beggars to attend his party; but a beggar didn’t use the proper attire inside the party so he was pulled out or drag away. So, perhaps proper attire for specifics occasions could test people sensitivity to the start of the problem both physical and spiritual sensitivity to small faults and mistakes. Perhaps, clothing could be used as a barometer of the living standard of people. Perhaps, pass law that dress code even at public places should be enforced to discipline people to be sensitive to small things, and give enough emphasis to small things first simultaneously with big things. Then the A.I. continues: Perhaps to fix this tendency of people not to be sensitive to the goodness being shared or people tend to abuse the good actions or gift shared perhaps there should be requirements or testing done so that those only qualified would really enjoy and those that did not pass the test would be forced to change and try again next time. There are many games in TV or radio that thru law could challenge poor to win prizes and enjoy happy moments and put some spice in life almost free; and should be enhanced and be imitated at family level, office level, and so on. Perhaps games for having incentives for the poor should be balanced. There should be question about good teachings, simple law, good health, sports, etc. Perhaps computer system could assign jobs to people through individual text messaging so that minimum requirement by good teaching would not be broken and also as long as one would not break any law. There are many jobs that could be offered to human if human would only let basic food stimulus, basic shelter stimulus, basic second hand appliances stimulus, basic second hand clothes stimulus, basic second hand car stimulus be managed and be run by automation and let ordinary or poor men enjoy those things almost free for being

balanced, discipline men- doing good and orchestrating with what the specifics things men should do as instructed or lead by smart economic systems or smart balanced world economic system. Computer system would focus its strategy to emancipate ordinary human from being left behind by smart people. Perhaps this system is mandated by law to have all necessary data about the ordinary individual’s age, health, educational back ground, environment back round or those specifics personal data of poor people so that a grand economic strategy could be planned out based from those details to fix any problem at the very start beginning from individual to family, to street, to county, to town, to city, to country or perhaps even to the whole wide world. The sensitivity to the start of lacking or excesses is also the strategy to treat problematic people with mentality deficient, spiritually deficient, courage deficient, strength deficient, or all kind of personality deficient. Then to fix it is just the opposite. Example: courage deficient is to have a courage surplus or enough of courage and so on and using all resources by the government to fix the problem. Example: a person is evaluated and found out that he has some courage deficiency because of some mental or psychological or physical problems. Perhaps even through text messaging and thru mailing a computer system could send instructions so that the ordinary individual with courage deficient could undergo example some basic military training about courage and honor to boost his self confidence with incentive of future job waiting depending on his skills and tests; perhaps being a security camera operator could let a person with courage deficiency have work. And the added cash creator who would consume product created by automation could create another economic cycle. Pass law that police men, military men, security men, nurses, teachers, street cleaner, care giver or jobs that automation is discouraged to compete with human should be increased so that example if a teacher once handles 100 pupils for a class perhaps now it would just be 25 students and many humans could have jobs; and so on…! But those precious skills of bright human should focus on other things that automation is not encouraged to compete and with high pay through law and by good teachings. And the very rich men who sometimes are greedy men should become almost always “charitable very rich men” by law; or by good teachings and be challenged to compete with smart robotics entrepreneurs that are programmed to serve the ordinary, poor and destitute; and be the best of the best. Being a charitable very rich is not extreme socialism because the giving of the very rich is whole hearted because his mind is not selfish, greedy. Or if he is greedy law would check and balance any extremism residing in his mind and heart because of universal Word. His talent is just an instrument of his “son-ship” or a “child” or “son” of God; but not that he is all responsible of all the wealth in his name perhaps called proud claim and because perhaps- “a single hair is not allowed to fall without the permission of God”- this idea could perhaps be found on the bible whose author is Apostle Paul. The A.I. advice the scholar to just encode “book of Apostle Paul” and “hair” in the bible software and perhaps the details about the facts could be displayed already. From someone who might be dreaming,