2530

  • Uploaded by: sabatino123
  • 0
  • 0
  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 2530 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 800
  • Pages: 5
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

1

Document 2530

Filed 11/10/2008

Page 1 of 5

[Parties Listed on Signature Page]

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

10 RAMBUS INC.,

CASE NO.: C 05-00334 RMW

11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., 14

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME ON RAMBUS’S MOTION TO STRIKE MANUFACTURERS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY (MSJ NO. 1 AND MSJ NO. 2)

Defendants. 15

Trial Date: January 19, 2009 Courtroom: 6 Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

16 17

RAMBUS INC.,

18

Plaintiff,

19 20 21

vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants.

22 23

RAMBUS INC.,

24

CASE NO.: C 06-00244 RMW Plaintiff,

25 26

CASE NO.: C 05-02298 RMW

vs. MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al.,

27

Defendants.

28 6320444.1

STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

1

Document 2530

Filed 11/10/2008

Page 2 of 5

STIPULATION AND ORDER

2

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to reschedule the hearing date for Daubert

3

motions and dispositive motions from December 2, 2008, to the afternoon of December 11, 2008,

4

and filed a filed a joint stipulation and proposed order seeking approval for that agreement on

5

November 7, 2008;

6

WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, that

7

Rambus may file a motion to strike the Manufacturers’ Motion for Summary Judgment of

8

Invalidity No. 1 and Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity No. 2 on shortened time so that

9

it may be heard on the same date as the motions that are the subject of the motion to strike, which,

10

subject to court approval, is December 11, 2008;

11

NOW therefore, it is hereby AGREED and STIPULATED, by and among the

12

parties hereto through their undersigned counsel, that the hearing date and briefing scheduling for

13

Rambus’s Motion to Strike the Manufacturers’ Motion for Summary Judgment No. 1 and Motion

14

for Summary Judgment No. 2 shall be as follows:

15

1.

November 12, 2008: Deadline to file opening brief;

16

2.

November 26, 2008: Deadline to file opposition;

17

3.

December 4, 2008: Deadline to file reply;

18

4.

December 11, 2008, at 2:00 p.m.: Hearing on Rambus’s Motion to Strike

19

the Manufacturers’ Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity No. 1 and

20

Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity No. 2.

21

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,

22

DATED:

________________________

______________________________

23

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

24 25 26 27 28 6320444.1

-1-

STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

1

DATED: November 10, 2008

2

Document 2530

Filed 11/10/2008

Page 3 of 5

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

3

McKOOL SMITH P.C.

4 5

By: /s/ ROSEMARIE T. RING

6

Attorneys for RAMBUS INC.

7 8

DATED: November 10, 2008

9 10

THEODORE BROWN III TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP THELEN LLP

11 12

By /s/ THEODORE BROWN III

13

Attorneys for HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD., and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR DEUTSCHLAND GmbH

14 15 16 17 18 19

DATED: November 10, 2008

SVEN RAZ WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

20 By: /s/

21

SVEN RAZ

22

Attorneys for MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et. al.

23 24 25 26 27 28 6320444.1

STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

1

DATED: November 10, 2008

Document 2530

Filed 11/10/2008

Page 4 of 5

ROBERT BEREZIN WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

2 3 By: /s/ 4

ROBERT BEREZIN

5

Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., AND SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P.

6 7 8 9

DATED: November 10, 2008

10

THERESA E. NORTON ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

11 By: /s/

12

THERESA E. NORTON

13

Attorneys for NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6320444.1

STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

1

Document 2530

Filed 11/10/2008

Page 5 of 5

Filer’s Attestation:

2

I, Rosemarie T. Ring am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used

3

to file this STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER ON PRETRIAL SCHEDULE. In

4

compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Theodore Brown III, Sven Raz,

5

Robert Berezin and Theresa Norton concur in this filing.

6 By: /s/

7

ROSEMARIE T. RING

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6320444.1

STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW

Related Documents

2530
November 2019 12
2530
June 2020 0
2530
June 2020 1

More Documents from ""

2215
October 2019 25
2193
October 2019 20
2408
November 2019 18
2427
November 2019 22
2312[1]
October 2019 21
2344
October 2019 21