Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1
Document 2530
Filed 11/10/2008
Page 1 of 5
[Parties Listed on Signature Page]
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
10 RAMBUS INC.,
CASE NO.: C 05-00334 RMW
11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al., 14
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME ON RAMBUS’S MOTION TO STRIKE MANUFACTURERS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY (MSJ NO. 1 AND MSJ NO. 2)
Defendants. 15
Trial Date: January 19, 2009 Courtroom: 6 Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
16 17
RAMBUS INC.,
18
Plaintiff,
19 20 21
vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants.
22 23
RAMBUS INC.,
24
CASE NO.: C 06-00244 RMW Plaintiff,
25 26
CASE NO.: C 05-02298 RMW
vs. MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al.,
27
Defendants.
28 6320444.1
STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1
Document 2530
Filed 11/10/2008
Page 2 of 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER
2
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to reschedule the hearing date for Daubert
3
motions and dispositive motions from December 2, 2008, to the afternoon of December 11, 2008,
4
and filed a filed a joint stipulation and proposed order seeking approval for that agreement on
5
November 7, 2008;
6
WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, that
7
Rambus may file a motion to strike the Manufacturers’ Motion for Summary Judgment of
8
Invalidity No. 1 and Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity No. 2 on shortened time so that
9
it may be heard on the same date as the motions that are the subject of the motion to strike, which,
10
subject to court approval, is December 11, 2008;
11
NOW therefore, it is hereby AGREED and STIPULATED, by and among the
12
parties hereto through their undersigned counsel, that the hearing date and briefing scheduling for
13
Rambus’s Motion to Strike the Manufacturers’ Motion for Summary Judgment No. 1 and Motion
14
for Summary Judgment No. 2 shall be as follows:
15
1.
November 12, 2008: Deadline to file opening brief;
16
2.
November 26, 2008: Deadline to file opposition;
17
3.
December 4, 2008: Deadline to file reply;
18
4.
December 11, 2008, at 2:00 p.m.: Hearing on Rambus’s Motion to Strike
19
the Manufacturers’ Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity No. 1 and
20
Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity No. 2.
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
22
DATED:
________________________
______________________________
23
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
24 25 26 27 28 6320444.1
-1-
STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1
DATED: November 10, 2008
2
Document 2530
Filed 11/10/2008
Page 3 of 5
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
3
McKOOL SMITH P.C.
4 5
By: /s/ ROSEMARIE T. RING
6
Attorneys for RAMBUS INC.
7 8
DATED: November 10, 2008
9 10
THEODORE BROWN III TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP THELEN LLP
11 12
By /s/ THEODORE BROWN III
13
Attorneys for HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD., and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR DEUTSCHLAND GmbH
14 15 16 17 18 19
DATED: November 10, 2008
SVEN RAZ WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
20 By: /s/
21
SVEN RAZ
22
Attorneys for MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et. al.
23 24 25 26 27 28 6320444.1
STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1
DATED: November 10, 2008
Document 2530
Filed 11/10/2008
Page 4 of 5
ROBERT BEREZIN WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
2 3 By: /s/ 4
ROBERT BEREZIN
5
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., AND SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P.
6 7 8 9
DATED: November 10, 2008
10
THERESA E. NORTON ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
11 By: /s/
12
THERESA E. NORTON
13
Attorneys for NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6320444.1
STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1
Document 2530
Filed 11/10/2008
Page 5 of 5
Filer’s Attestation:
2
I, Rosemarie T. Ring am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used
3
to file this STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER ON PRETRIAL SCHEDULE. In
4
compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Theodore Brown III, Sven Raz,
5
Robert Berezin and Theresa Norton concur in this filing.
6 By: /s/
7
ROSEMARIE T. RING
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6320444.1
STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW