2016-ipcrf-for-master-teacher-modified.xls

  • Uploaded by: DAHLIA SALONGA
  • 0
  • 0
  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 2016-ipcrf-for-master-teacher-modified.xls as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,267
  • Pages: 8
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM Name of Employee : VILMA P. MERCADO Position : MASTER TEACHER Review Period : JUNE -MARCH 2016 LAGUNA Bureau / Center / Service / Division :

Name of Rater ; Position : Date of Review :

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING MFO's

KRA's

Basic PROFESSIONAL Education GROWTH AND Services DEVELOPMENT 30%

OBJECTIVES

1. Conducts at least one (1) classroom based action research to remedy problems & issues in a school during the year.

TIMELINE

WEIGHT PER OBJECTIVE

15% June to March 2017

TO BE FILLED DUR

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS QUALITY 5 - Effectively completed,adopted, & utilized, found to be effective to remedy the problems/issues in the classroom/school. 4- Completed, adopted, & utilized, found less effective, utilized, found less effective issues in the classroom/school. 3 - Completed but found not effective to remedy the problems/issues

in the classroom/school 2- Approved proposal but not conducted 1- Made proposal but not approved. EFFICIENCY 5- Action Research had complete entries of the required contents and neatly written 4- Action Research had 1 incomplete entry of the required contents 3- Action Research had 2 incomplete entries of the required contents 2- Action Research had 3 incomplete entries of the required contents 1- Action Research had 4-5 incomplete entries of the required entries. TIMELINESS 5- Submitted an action research proposal earlier than the opening of classes of the current school year 4- Submitted an action research proposal from June to August of the current school year 3- Submitted an action research proposal from September to October of the current school year 2- Submitted an action research proposal from November to December of the current school year 1- Submitted an action research proposal from January to March of the

ACTUAL RESULT

Q E

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING MFO's

KRA's

OBJECTIVES 2. Serves as demonstration teacher, facilitator,resource person within the school year.

TIMELINE June to March 2017

WEIGHT PER OBJECTIVE

TO BE FILLED DUR

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS QUALITY, EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS

15%

5 - Served as demonstration teacher, facilitator, resource person and shared effective teaching techniques and strategies. 4 - Served as demonstration teacher, facilitator, resource person but slightly shared effective teaching techniques and strategies. 3 - Served as demonstration teacher, facilitator, resource person but never shared effective teaching techniques and strategies. 2 - Just served as demonstration teacher 1 - Never served any of the the activities given and did not share anything

Basic Education Services

INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE 1. Accounts learning outcomes 40% vis-à-vis goals and targets.

QUALITY and EFFICIENCY

June to March 2017

20%

Targets: MPS in Quarterly Test-75%

5- 75% to 100% met all the targets. 4- 65% to 74% met all the targets. 3- 55% to 64% met all the targets. 2- 45% to 54% met all the targets 1- 44% and below met all the targets.

TIMELINESS 5- Results submitted with analysis before target date 4- Results submitted with analysis on target date 3- Results submitted with analysis after target date 2- Results submitted with analysis but 1 month late target date 1- Results did not submit anymore

Participation Rate - 95% Completion Rate - 85%

QUALITY and EFFICIENCY

2. Provides technical assistance to teachers to increase the target MPS for every quarter.

June to March 2017

20%

5 - 100% of the target teachers given TA 4- 75% of the target teachers given TA 3 - 50% of the target teachers given TA 2- 25% of the target teachers given TA 1- None of the target teachers given TA TIMELINESS 5- Results submitted with analysis before the target date 4- Results submitted with analysis on target date 3- Results submitted with analysis after target date 2- Results submitted with analysis but 1 month late target date 1- Results did not submit anymore 1- Results did not submit anymore

ACTUAL RESULT

Q E

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING MFO's

KRA's

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT PER

TO BE FILLED DUR

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

OBJECTIVE QUALITY

Basic INSTRUCTIONAL 1. Observes _________ Education SUPERVISION teachers in the school Services with pre and post 20% conference within the Year.

June to March 2017

10%

5- Teachers observed with pre and post conference, with teacher observation reports resulting to improving teaching competencies. 4- Teachers observed with pre and post conference with teacher observation reports but moderately improving teaching competencies.

3- Teachers observed with pre and post conference with teacher observation reports but slightly improving teaching competencies.

2- Teachers observed with pre and post conference but no teacher observation reports and no improvement in teaching competencies.

1- Teachers just observed

EFFICIENCY 5- 100% of the target number of teachers was observed 4- 75% of the target number of teachers was observed 3- 50% of the target number of teachers was observed 2- 25% of the target number of teachers was observed 1- None of the target number of teachers was observed TIMELINESS 5 - Submit observation reports before due date. 4 -Submit observation reports before due date 3 -Submit observation reports after due date. 2 - Submit observation reports after 5 days of due date.

1- Never submit observation reports 2. Conducts mentoring/ coaching activities to ______ grade _____ teachers quarterly.

QUALITY June to March 2017

10%

5 - Outstandingly mentored/coached the teachers and highly improve the teaching-learning process . 4 - Very satisfactorily mentored/coached the teachers and moderately improve the teaching-learning process. 3 - Satisfactorily mentored and coached the teachers and slightly improve the teaching-learning process. 2- Unsatisfatorily mentored/coached the teachers and no improvement

happened in teaching-learning process. 1- Never conducted mentoring and coaching activities.

EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS 5 - Accomplished 100% of the target per quarter 4- Accomplished 75% of the target per quarter 3 - Accomplished 50% of the target per quarter 2- Accomplished 25% of the target per quarter

ACTUAL RESULT

Q E

1- None

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING MFO's

KRA's PLUS FACTOR

OBJECTIVES 1. Receives awards and recognitions within a year.

TIMELINE

WEIGHT PER

June to March 2017

OBJECTIVE

5%

TO BE FILLED DUR

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS QUALITY , EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS 5- Received special awards in National Level during the SY 4- Received special awards in Regional Level during the SY 3- Received special awards in Division Level during the SY 2- Received special awards in District Level during the SY 1- Received special awards in School Level during the SY

PLUS FACTOR

1. Initiates programs and projects that will enhance the curriculum using localized materials every

June to March 2017

5%

quarter.

QUALITY , EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS 5 - Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum and its delivery and lead to 100% of the teachers to use localized materials in teaching. 4 - Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum and its delivery and lead to 75% of the teachers to use localized materials in teaching. 3- Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum and its delivery and lead to 50% of the teachers to use localized materials in teaching. 2- Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum and its delivery and lead to 25% of the teachers to use localized materials in teaching. 1- Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum and its delivery and lead to 0% of the teachers to use localized materials in teaching.

APPROVED: Rater

Ratee _______________________________

ACTUAL RESULT

Q E

;

:

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION ACTUAL RESULT

T AVE.

RATING

SCORE

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION ACTUAL RESULT

T AVE.

RATING

SCORE

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION ACTUAL RESULT

T AVE.

RATING

SCORE

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION ACTUAL RESULT

T AVE.

RATING

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

SCORE

More Documents from "DAHLIA SALONGA"

Italian
November 2019 52
Simply Heaven
November 2019 29
Alur Gula Darah.docx
November 2019 27