2008 Revised Criteria For Evaluation Of Project Proposal
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View 2008 Revised Criteria For Evaluation Of Project Proposal as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 243
- Pages: 2
UNIVERSITY OF PANGASINAN Dagupan City
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF PROJECT PROPOSAL FOR COMMUNITY EXTENSION SERVICES REVISED SEPTEMBER 2008 MEETS ALL REQUIRE MENTS
MEETS MOST REQUI RE
MEETS SOME REQUI RE
MENTS
MENTS
MEETS
NONE/
FEW
NOT
REQUI RE
STATE D
MENTS
A. Project Name. (5%) Clarity in giving the project a clear profile. B. Summary. (5%) Description of the main activities of the project and its objectives, target group and cooperating partners. C. Partnership (5%) Clarity of the statement on the project tasks and areas of responsibility of the implementers Involvement of partner organizations(Upang faculty, LGUs, NGOs, GOs) in feasibility study and other planning activities D. Community Analysis(15%) Sufficient and current description of the infrastructure, economic, health, educational, socio-cultural, environmental situation of the area E. Target groups(10%)
5
4
3
2
0
5
4
3
2
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
15
12
8
5
0
5
4
3
2
0
5
4
3
2
0
15
12
8
5
0
10
8
6
4
0
5
4
3
2
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
5
4
3
2
0
NSTP Section: ___________Name and Signature of Panelist: ______________________________________ Date of Evaluation: ___________________________ Over-all Rating : ______________________________
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF PROJECT PROPOSAL FOR COMMUNITY EXTENSION SERVICES REVISED SEPTEMBER 2008 MEETS ALL REQUIRE MENTS
MEETS MOST REQUI RE
MEETS SOME REQUI RE
MENTS
MENTS
MEETS
NONE/
FEW
NOT
REQUI RE
STATE D
MENTS
A. Project Name. (5%) Clarity in giving the project a clear profile. B. Summary. (5%) Description of the main activities of the project and its objectives, target group and cooperating partners. C. Partnership (5%) Clarity of the statement on the project tasks and areas of responsibility of the implementers Involvement of partner organizations(Upang faculty, LGUs, NGOs, GOs) in feasibility study and other planning activities D. Community Analysis(15%) Sufficient and current description of the infrastructure, economic, health, educational, socio-cultural, environmental situation of the area E. Target groups(10%)
5
4
3
2
0
5
4
3
2
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
15
12
8
5
0
5
4
3
2
0
5
4
3
2
0
15
12
8
5
0
10
8
6
4
0
5
4
3
2
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0
5
4
3
2
0
NSTP Section: ___________Name and Signature of Panelist: ______________________________________ Date of Evaluation: ___________________________ Over-all Rating : ______________________________
Related Documents
2008 Revised Criteria For Evaluation Of Project Proposal
November 2019 1
Evaluation Criteria
November 2019 26
Evaluation Of The Project
May 2020 19
Evaluation Of Group Project
October 2019 48