Ya Mar One 060309

  • Uploaded by: Zerohedge
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Ya Mar One 060309 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,493
  • Pages: 42
“What We’re Watching to Identify the Economic Recovery”

June 3, 2009 Richard Yamarone Director of Economic Research Argus Research Corp.

Hoping for a “V”-Shaped Recovery Real GDP (%) 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

-8 '95

'97

'99

'01

'03

'05

'07

'09 F

Leading Indicators Signal Some Degree of Recovery Leading Economic Indicators vs. Real GDP Growth (Y/Y%) GDP

10

10

LEI

8

8

6

6

4

-2.5%

4

2

2

0

0

-2

-3.0% Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, The Conference Board, Argus Research Corp.

-4

'85

'95

'05

-2 -4

The Most Convincing Argument of Recovery ECRI Weekly Leading Index 15 10 5 0 -5 10 -10 -15 Source: Bloomberg, ECRI

-20 -25 -30 '99

'01

'03

'05

'07

'09

Fed Indices Point to More Prosperous Times Chicago Fed National Activity Index Three Month Moving Average 1.00 0.50 0.00 -0 50 -0.50 -1.00 -1.50 -2.00 -2.50 -3.00 Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

-3.50 -4.00

'90

'93

'96

'99

'02

'05

'08

A-D-S Business Conditions Index Improving

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Anecdotal Reports Starting to Improve UPS Volume

U.S. Average Daily Package Volume UPS vs. Real GDP

Real GDP

7

6 5

5 4 3

3 2

1 1 -1

0 UPS Volume

-1

Real GDP

3 -3 -2 Source: United Parcel Service, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Argus Research -3

-5 2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

Fiscal Policy Arriving at the Spigots Direct Outlays, Stimulus Package ($Blns) 250

200

150 Source: CBO

100

50

0

-50

2009

'10

'11

'12

'13

'14

'15

'16

'17

'18

2019

Monetary Policy…

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Business Investment has Collapsed Capital Spending (%) Non-Residential Investment 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30

Source: Bureau of Economic Research

-40

'88

'90

'92

'94

'96

'98

'00

'02

'04

'06

'08

Little Reason for Hope in New Orders Data New Orders NonDefense Capital Goods Ex-Aircraft (Y/Y%) 24 16 8 0 -8 8 -16 -24 -32 Source: Department of Commerce

-40

'94

'96

'98

'00

'02

'04

'06

'08

Key Index Implying Strong Recovery ISM New Orders - Inventories vs. Real GDP NO-I GD P Y / Y %

25

9

20 15

6

10 5

3

0 -5

0

GDP NO-INV NO INV

-10

Source: B EA , ISM , A rgus Research

-15 1983

-3 1988

1993

1998

2003

2008

Little Need to Build With Glut of Commercial Property Structures Spending (%) 30

15

0

-15

-30 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

-45

'94

'96

'98

'00

'02

'04

'06

'08

Signs of Stabilization New & Existing Home Sales New

Existing

1350 7300

1200

New Existing

6550

1050

900

5800

750 5050

600 4300

450 Source: US Dept. of Commerce, National Association of Realtors

300

3550

'96

'99

'02

'05

'08

Home Prices Returning to Pre-Bubble Levels S&P/Case Shiller Home Price Indices AZ-Phoenix 300

CA-Los Angeles CA-San Diego

275

CA-San Francisco CO-Denver

250

DC-Washington FL-Miami

225

FL-Tampa GA-Atlanta

200

IL-Chicago MA Boston MA-Boston

175

MI-Detroit

Source: S&P

150

MN-Minneapolis NC-Charlotte

125

NV-Las Vegas NY-New York

100

OH-Cleveland OR-Portland

75 '00

'01

'02

'03

'04

'05

'06

'07

'08

'09

TX-Dallas WA-Seattle S

Encouraging Signs in the Housing/Construction Market Architecture Firms' Billing Index 65

60

55

50

45

40

35 Source: American Institute of Architects

30 1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

“Stimulus” May Help Ailing Construction Sector Construction Spending (Y/Y%) 30

20

10

0

-10

-20

Non-Residential Residential

-30 Source: Department of Commerce -40 2003

2005

2007

2009

Trade, the Unsexy Savior Contribution to GDP Residential Spending & Trade 3.5 2.93

Residential

3

Trade 2.5

2.18

2 03 2.03

2

1.66 1.33

1.5

0.94

1 0.5

0.59

1.05 0.77

0.09

0 -0.5

-0.12

-0.23

-0.15 -0.52

-0.6

-1 1 -1.11

-1.5

-1.18

-0.91 -1.2

-1.4

-0.6 -0 0.8 8

-1.06

-1.12 -1.33 Source: BEA, Argus Research

-1.39

-2 '06 QI

QII

QIII

QIV

'07 QI

QII

QIII

QIV

'08 QI

QII

QIII

QIV

'09 QI

Some Recovery in Container Traffic Outbound Container Statistics (TEU) Port of Long Beach 170,000 150,000 130,000 110,000 90,000 70 000 70,000 Source: Port of Long Beach

50,000 '95

'97

'99

'01

'03

'05

'07

'09

Some Signs of Peak in Unemployment 'Jobs Hard-to-Get' & Unemployment Rate U Rate

Jobs Index

50

10 9

40 8 Jobs Index

30

7 6

20 Unemployment Rate

5

10 4 Source: Conference Board, Bureau of Labor Statistics

3

0 '90

'92

'94

'96

'98

00

'02

'04

'06

'08

Unemployment Benefit Claims Point to Economic Trough Weekly Initial Claims 700 000 700,000 650,000 600,000 Source: US Department of Labor

550,000 500,000 450 000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000

'96

'97

'98

'99

'00

'01

'02

'03

'04

'05

'06

'07

'08

'09

Ever-Resilient Consumer Tossed in Towel Real Consumer Spending (%) 10

5

0

Source: Bureau of Economic Aanalysis

-5 1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

‘Fab Five’ – Dining Out Spending: Meals at Other Eating Places (Y/Y% ) 8

6

4

2

0

-2

4 -4 Source: Bureau Economic Analysis, NBER

-6 '98

'01

'04

'07

‘Fab Five’ – Jewelry & Watches Spending: Jewelry & Watches Y/Y% 16 12 8 4 0 -4 -8 -12 Source: Bureau Economic Analysis, NBER

-16 '98

'01

'04

'07

‘Fab Five’ – Cosmetics & Perfumes Spending: Cosmetics & Perfumes (Y/Y% ) 6

3

0

-3

-6 Source: Bureau Economic Analysis, NBER

-9 '98

'01

'04

'07

‘Fab Five’ – Women’s Dresses Spending: Women's Clothing (Y/Y%) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6

Source: Bureau Economic Analysis, NBER

-8

'98

'01

'04

'07

‘Fab Five’ – Casino Gambling Spending: Casino Gambling Y/Y% 24 20 16 12 8 4 0 -4 -8 -12

Source: Bureau Economic Analysis, NBER

-16 '98

'01

'04

'07

‘Fab Five’ Recovery… Post Recession, Fab-Five December 2001=100 145 140 135 130 125 120

Dining Out Perfumes Women's Jewelry Casino

115 110 105 100 95

Dec 01 Dec-01

Dec 02 Dec-02

Dec 03 Dec-03

Dec 04 Dec-04

Dec 05 Dec-05

Dec 06 Dec-06

Dec 07 Dec-07

Bad Signs for Summer Spending Real Spending: Hotels & Motels (Y/Y% ) 16 12 8 4 0 -4 4 -8 -12 -16

Source: Bureau Economic Analysis, Argus Research, NBER

-20 '98

'01

'04

'07

Auto Industry is the Wildcard

America Still Loves Those Trucks Total Vehicle Assemblies (Mlns) 9

Source: Federal Reserve System

Trucks 8

Autos

7 6

4.12 3.97

5

3.72

4 3.11

3.05

3.2

1.33

1.66

1.87

1.84

Jan-09

Feb-09

Mar-09

Apr-09

3 2.52 2

3 72 3.72

3 34 3.34

2.95

1 0 Oct-08

Nov-08

Dec-08

Prices Aren’t Aren t ‘Collapsing’ Collapsing The Economist Commodity Price Index

275 All Items

260 245

Industrials Food

230 215 200 Source: The Economist

185 170 155 140

2005=100

125 110 2/14/2001

2/13/2002

2/12/2003

2/11/2004

2/9/2005

Market Inflation Expectations Rising 5-Year Treasury Note - Five Year TIPS Spread 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0 50 0.50 0.00 -0.50 -1.00 -1.50 -2.00

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Argus Research

-2.50

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Consumer Inflation Expectations on the Rise Reuters/U. Michigan Inflation Expectations (%) 6.0

5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0 Source: Bloomberg

1.0

0.0

'03

'04

'05

'06

'07

'08

'09

Broad Inflation Measures Still Elevated GDP Deflators (%) 6

4

2

0

-2

PCE Deflator GDP Deflator

-4 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis -6 2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

No ‘Deflation’ in this Respected Measure Dallas Fed Trimmed-Mean PCE Inflation (Y/Y%) 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

1.5 '95

'97

'99

'01

'03

'05

'07

'09

Inflation Pressures Appear to be ‘Well-Anchored’… For Now Core Personal Consumption Expenditure Deflator (Y/Y%) 4.5 40 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5

Federal Reserve 'Comfort Zone'

1.0 0.5

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Argus Research

0.0

'90 90

'92 92

'94 94

'96 96

'98 98

'00 00

'02 02

'04 04

'06 06

'08 08

Monetary Policy Getting Easier Every Month Real Fed Funds Rate Core Personal Consumption Deflator (%) 6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0

-2.0

'87

'89

'91

'93

'95

'97

'99

'01

'03

'05

'07

'09

Internal Fed Gauge Implies Fed to Remain on ‘Hold’ Argus Leading Fed Funds Index FF %

Index

9

130 37 16 37.16

8

120

FED FUNDS ALFFI

7

110 100

6

90 5 80 4 70 3

60

2

50

1

40

0

30 '90

'92

'94

'96

'98

'00

'02

'04

'06

'08

Risks to “V”-Shaped Recovery…

9 Auto Industry Collapse 9 Commodity (Food), Energy, Healthcare Inflation 9(price ( pass alongs announced during the quarterly y earning season)) 9 Stimulus Fails to Generate Jobs 9 Consumers Decide to Save 9 Jobs Climate Deteriorates Further

Reasons for Optimism…

9 Massive Monetary Stimulus in Pipeline 9 Large Stimulus of Falling Energy Prices 9 Government Has Approved Whopping Fiscal Spending Program 9 Home Prices Have Returned to Pre-Bubble Levels 9 Frozen Credit Markets Have Thawed Considerably

Related Documents

Ya Mar One 060309
May 2020 8
Mar Ya Ti 010106
October 2019 19
Ya
November 2019 59
Ya
June 2020 29
Ya Ali Ya Hussain
July 2020 31
Hi Ya Ya
June 2020 23

More Documents from ""