Community of Inquiry: Helping Students and Teachers to Build Thinking Communities
What is collaborative inquiry-based learning?
Creating a Community of Inquiry in the Classroom
John Dewey
INQUIRY
COMMUNITY
Lev Vygotsky
Thinking in education “…all which the school can or need do for pupils, so far as their minds are concerned...is to develop their ability to think.” Democracy and Education, p. 152
“The sole direct path to enduring improvement in the methods of instruction and learning consists in centering upon the conditions which exact, promote and test thinking.” Democracy and Education, p. 153
Internalization of forms of social exchange Every feature in the child’s cultural development appears twice: first on the social level, and later, on the individual level; first between people (interpsychological), and then inside the child (intrapsychological).... All the higher psychological functions originate as actual relations between human individuals. Lev Vygotsky, Mind in Society, p. 57
Inquiry-based learning involves learning to: •identify problems •probe and question •hypothesize and explain •weigh reasons and evidence •consider various possibilities •explore concepts and ideas •reason proficiently
Collaborative learning involves: •discussion and deliberation •work in pairs and small groups •substantive communication •considering other’s viewpoints •the give-and–take of reasons •exploring disagreement •learning to think for yourself
Improving the intellectual quality of student work and fostering a quality learning environment SUBSTANTIVE COMMUNICATION
DEEPER KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING
HIGHER ORDER THINKING
Inquiry-based learning helps to raise the intellectual quality of classroom work. Collaborative work helps to provide a quality learning environment.
HIGH LEVELS OF ENGAGEMENT
SUPPORTIVE CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT
STUDENT SELF REGULATION
What kind of person are we trying to form? By teaching and learning through collaborative inquiry we aim to produce individuals who are: • • • • • • •
critical and creative thinkers reasonable good collaborators effective communicators tolerant inclusive caring
•Critical and creative thinking Students become proficient in the use of an array of tools that enable them to think critically and creatively when solving problems and dealing with issues.
•Reasonableness Students learn to explore their differences and disagreements reasonably, by examining reasons for what they and others believe, and withholding judgment or changing their minds if that is appropriate.
•Collaboration Students see themselves as belonging to a collaborative community. They learn to value each other’s contributions and build upon one other’s ideas.
•Effective communication Students learn to communicate complex thoughts effectively and to deliberate with others on matters of intellectual interest and common concern.
•Tolerance Students learn to be more considerate of cultural and individual differences, and to be respectful of others who may be different from themselves.
•Inclusiveness
Students learn to consider different points of view and to seek a wider understanding.
•Care By exploring their thoughts ideas and values together, students develop care and concern for each other.
Academic results
2002 Queensland Year 7 Tests Aspects of Numeracy and Literacy
nu mb er me as /d ata sp ac e sp el ing wr itin rd g g/ vie wi ng
800 780 760 740 720 700 680 660 640 620
Buranda SS State
2006 Queensland Year 3 Tests Aspects of Literacy and Numeracy
700
630
680
buranda
state
buranda
state
ing sp ell
g wr itin
ng vi ew i
ac e
d
ing sp ell
itin g wr
iew in g
ac e
rd g/v
sp
er
/da ta me as
nu mb
rac y
iti n
ell in sp
nu me
rd
wr
wi ng g/ vie
sp
& m en t
re m ea su
state
600
an
570
sp
580
490
in g
500
620
ad
590
re
510
640
/d at a
600
660
g
520
g
610
ce
530
da ta
620
nu m be r
540
m ea s
550
720
640
m be r
560
740
650
nu
570
660
er ac y
580
nu m
590
buranda
2006 Queensland Year 7 Tests Aspects of Literacy and Numeracy
2006 Queensland Year 5 Tests Aspects of Literacy and Numeracy
Buranda State School Literacy compared with the State
Year 2
1999
2000
2001
Year 5
2002
2003
Literacy Overall
Reading
0
0
0
0
-28
Spelling
Writing
-28
0
0
0
-28
Year 7
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
24
0
0
29
0
0
21
17
13
14
0
16
12
29
0
0
21
17
13
14
0
0
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-12
0
0
0
0
17
13
14
Buranda State School Literacy compared with the State Year 2 Reading 1997-2007 Buranda State School
Year 3 Reading 2001-2007 Buranda State School
3
600
2.5
580 560
2
Buranda
1.5
State
1
Buranda
540 520
State
500 480
0.5 0 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 06 20 07
460 2001
Year 5 Reading 1998-2007 Buranda State School
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Year 7 Reading 1997-2007 Buranda State School 740
700 680 660 640 620 600 580 560 540 520
720 700
Buranda State
Buranda
680
State
660 640 620 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Cognitive gains at 2-year follow-up
K.J. Topping and S. Trickey, ‘Collaborative philosophical inquiry for schoolchildren: Cognitive gains at 2year follow-up,’ British Journal of Educational Psychology (2007), 77, 787-796.
YouTube - unsw's Channel