This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
d thcD, of , 011 ill ea...,c. """ m.n it doc c:oonc.
ae
'0
.
it doc ~
peopl e i" . h. .......101: I ...... , flS:IUfWC ... be ~ IIr • 00' IIr' "'1' (alb.• •• " -he> .. " or daa. 1. sl-dd . 1oo be I'I:IoIbblc lor lflOn oopftiIanlCd .~. ~ po ' =J1 ln ,..;tIl Inc bad of tlI.rd • it doc - . vioo> ..;u tud ;, ~ • !T' hi!:i><'r k~cL
n.c
I I
l J_ .odi
.vc..,.
e-
. . ••. of...,. W..lJ. Wdl runt.. \\'boll did .... .,. _ I JIll II> ICI die port . . die \\...... 01 W . _ I .a.-.:I "')" __ . """"'. .......DCd docirIiaM irD&o!NmaIly, "'" u i.. te , pa.. of p ......... f ..-h .,. p i ble, 1 pbooopapll wilido . , te..... _ _ doc . 1aDCC5 of wUc die ..,.. will 1M:. I :ally Iikcd m- . . ....... ""JCd-.. docy .....u tb.roo , h .... ,.......... of ~ ! ... ,.,...,.. oJ liMed bodies ...dcr pr...-c- """""'. u ........... _ .......... G..- W.t1 ..-tI .., ....u..d · iaoidttI........• ud I ~ it lao 011 d>io IIOC02JC ....f'Jl'. TiIcr rnIly Iih
"I
AIld ' he.. J'O.. ·d te e . ll , Iocle ......o.rfuJ Iinl. hando, thcoc Iittl. be-.. 6qcrs. 1Nbll)' lui 1uAdI. ! Jli:m.&n,n
n.
'I "
Ii
~ .,.ftidl
Dck dUo fIilc . baaI:"""" .....,.Iuado !ha'C arc. n-. -.Id he of .. . to..di", ,h . u: . ,,01 I' d OIl'. · .\.11 rip.. CVU'J"Oft< J'C' in ... . bi, cirdc. I MR ADd in the 10.. N fIC S_~ partbcir hondo ......' I ...... ~ I'II>ot IUft thc foctl....
"'praeR'
ae n ~ '"""" ..ma. ,D ~ him., ODd "'" dlra......., Ikr n.u of die
icIoca aDd idcoo ..ph of the
~n
. . I, it . ..., d>c powc.b..aodI.. obo . - a fr_
Y-. n. " ..... of w . BICn;lOO d>c ..,. of d>c poia ....... nri.rio of nd . ..d_ _lCt\I.~J1)"_¢ut Cf'C<:D bon tha t 01_ rcocIo like •
..
bUd:
~ IE-...I. WI .....Rin,
"""""
...
Hc.f"- . . 6tlood dyinJ w-. lDiuileo . .. (..eKu .0 .... . . 01
I I'
I
it'•• ~ ~ ~.
. . AJod i. m e · S o.. -v ... I.,,,, It-......... _ e· pu d . a c 1""Uo! WiDd. of W.. _ hic.b. _ up
it.1ooD IUc.......Jt: of blood .ac! oil. I, '. like I ri~ of wi"d blowi"J . ero... I. a dscoo pc Hurt' , Ho.. did thcoc .......u.c I , ,,01 i' .-ou.ld fill ,. but in fronti"" J co eOID e . Oou. ; - d.e J i.." j kccpinr the " Cuodo contlinctl-1re foea of the thru ............. ond the riell of lup 5prcJ "ith dWr _ ....n (t!le Indio" ..,:th bni
-"'" of diolopes on _ _ lethe piooa ... ....... "" l els. I ...,,1 il '0 opc n ' c _
.......0.-1 i1Df*C. I lib ... ~ in arc. buolDi., ••.,. pJl[Flic:ll_ T'bat'. -toy I like ....,.J paicnq-
wiUdl is ~. ... en: mcy joiD • co=maai<)" of
-..b """ ...
tbcre. We b...e
do....
ll. i. '. baa". au will k. , h.... So. . pin. it'l • ph« eMftCd..... lut ... lSO fcc I of
in Us, l..oo An Who _ TC the . udi. ...... . NI did ,n.l· r..c,: Fu, •.,,,,pl•. , J""""", ~....... foy, poneil , ,,01 Fi" nioh o..e fo. ",.d • Io
.bou,
",-, .nd 'o'Cfbo1 d i~ fr>r audiocn
~.
I ICC the "'T ri .... ph of .h• Haado' ~ • a -y -.Ie of die 11'" , 11'", ........ ..... _ _ ~ o.. _kft ..., .. d>an.acn _ tu. who oarc .. I IlCZ"eCO _ wUdo thuc are dolbr lrilIIl lDd ""a tfCICatiIl. ft ' l'or c.umpIc, ,-..,.....-..,....., ,.,.... ",100 fl Y. oJ'.. J oOD, .......r . I' . pm. ... J'C' d>c _ - , ..' 1:0 th e middl e ;. I dlanonc . ...ho ;. .....,;"C ... _ _ b.ItlOo "'to . ocria 01 .. adoi rip. d>crc • • _ _ Io<>b .. .......... . . .nd COOl Ie"' pl docir power. And Den '0 hc r it .. p"lllli.., hi. Iolndl ..... r fro'" Ioi. Iood. 1'hac w..-tJ. W.IJ ... ...ti.... .n bo~. Ii",ple Th imo,u., of il • tdlioJ of h_ . - """'"P pr-. 01 pri ..... ill an ! dlIns< toward bol~ t don ' , "'ad
n. ..........
n.... _ "'"'
I
on....
lI'IOSf ..,.,.nd~·
'
.. n-c """" ...diaM:a very diffct-t. ladad. doer ..... diffe ....' w , •..,e'be• •her _ _ a - . .ploot for orloa. .... tryiaJ to x~. ..th the It·
W... 10 } DC.......
...... ..
m.
people ..
tbe ......oc ~ .......,
no.,
m-...ti<>o:Ial ,
"'ll>Ir in•• 11 1 people.. ."""c..... oi Irudr ,... 01 _ _ . boIa the pIo...... '" r'"" 0."'" me · ", .. , i.J of , ..-orido 1/r doc .......... thi. yc J <>e u . . felli.al ...Ioe" pc opl. ' fl u ded , 100" .. 01 ill .he W ",.11 " e n• • " .... . c ry in . . .. Then. in tho s.o.;•• Ulli.....
..... fe••"c.
• populotB.~ (.., w die ~ upccII dtc 10 e'e ..... "n f.mi li• .h. So.i.. U ni on doc t hI "'o..., <:allOciai . nli.. In"" In Mooc o ( COlIne • •h.re the oddiDoot of d>c Sarin pelId -
Alai Bc:ro laJI ...... . o
w.loa"
,"e. u n
io Los ' cI.. co ......,.. ebild.e pa...... . £omilia.. r
..... the M....- ofC"_ . .~' Art ia Lao~
,. ...........
_._... -
-.- _.-
~ --_
I
•
".Sad
I .i'
*
.'
t ..- . ' --. ', · ' s
;-
."...
Towards a World in Balance A conversation with Judy Baca: Part 2 ........
At yo u 1tD_.J
I .....,...,.;v, ;",.......... ..
do II a- irIsuIloticaol lilo w..u w.u WMI has • ......., rc:loOoooohip ..tb .... .....nI ..._ . iJILot W'JJ. r....i1i... ..-c u4 "1"1"" lhc loa. p ille aDd ch ilcl .. "fI'"""-' '' ~ . die ...... M...oua ........... aad . . &co
,.lI ,.....,
I
_ bo.... bu d. b.. tled . ... p . fa.' li.."j in D ' all .... "'"" dial ill NII _ ~---_, u tlicr ..ork . clu ccl to , .... bri., i. to • • i lioaal . ~ I lib i W-U iotuneial. nlatiou. n . W~ W.ll taka wltn llancd .. doc WJl aka • ...,.,...:I pc.... an
•
.... . ......... . . doon:_ • . . ... . _ r. a;&
--W...-.l ..-...l • - ' ...
.......
..,..w-l
J '" E.
"'__"" _ olio"""""" _ .I-.I'eaplc
...... .... '"'""' , -,...--
Loo .vp.
iI
- ' docci
. " ,iI.
Ya..
no..
....... '--,.... '*'"
.---
' Ooy n..p. ...
•
..100 uM;..n.;O, .....--...., ..- ... noIrar.. ,..-..ar......_ ....... ' h 'J -.....I ...-ac....a.c.., __ . ..... . dIoldn.-I ...., ilooII
01 -.nl -.k, ...aido _
lUI • ,""- I t:IWU: it
.........,...
_~-*
.....
' - ia Loo AJlrlco. .. Iocrc dot Ion .. , I ,.. 1>«..
dUld....
...-....l iado.l " ... ,... 01: lbo IlBIftl ~ 0 - me JD"o . . m1lftIs " - .,....j drIrf
.....bWoy in dIc cicy. n. ..........&ed ..,. w. daM:
1 ....
Ih. ...
....-. nc, .... ....,............ iD clro:Calof-. "'- ~_
__000.-..._ Ot SPAKe fSori. 1 • P . Wk 1011 R_ . n Ceo.., ). lIt_,lot • of c:loildruo oJoror-a4 ...,. talboI
1"_'
_J_
..... r...n, . . . '-'e
l
ADd --.lafaI
...... m....
";110'.,....,w1lioL.a..tlIIoI_ ..... ,..ad> om"d _ . doiW",. ;. .......... doiWrc_ ........
. . He _
• rcma
_ct.h.i", abou< liM: Iia
~Ur. ""n
ammc.
e.'1
... .... Noo OllJr_
...,..
SVNDRAAOTH
..u
....,. ~ &no nsI "'-"'I 01: die W""" W.... ia dIU ..0-...,. took pi.... in
r.-
"" .......
__ _
t
..... _
'*'"f. ....--. ...
r .IiI:E ..... ............
*
'
•
··_WcIo.... "" 1a
... . . wP
r
R.u.o czhibili-. ..., aJJod • loo:aI ...... --.. ..bid>io ..... """ ia ..... Proc""""'- .... tbct Iai. th ey boa-. iIl _ ', bo Put of m. W-U Wnr. i emli.... i.
........... _'*"' __ --.,&..
...........
..h
Wt.c do .,...rhilI.k _
_
ca.pk.. . . . . - - - - projoa i. 1990 iA G...o.I"pc • • 1Ud. io 10• • ~ !I. - ' " .f Leo
.. •,.-u-. ,....01""- ....... 1 i.. rebtioaslloip .i ., n diuus. in ....I..j~p .. Maico. _ portoopo iIo ...........
fO ~
k ""1IOd _
. .... lIioail.ariD. a.d .. tJa..- . - .... W-UW ,.... ariiet ~ TIM: Gofor
__ M alOCIttIIiDJ ..-l ore ""-- It .. _ 01 .... few ..... .... .. ~Ma.o ol ... _____ wid. ........ 'T1Ioft
'*"''*' '
....
eabIos aIlowt oM
-u. ..
W e . .bocbct . ..... ....... _ _tho)' ....
..b.ido .....,. "".....
:.......,Ieo ..,. ...
.. n.
G••• • W. U i.. Los ~ is • 1IoipIr .n..n..I ,0-. ,........., _ • • ciIly. ou:. ... ~ ...... i edWc ~ if; io • coIIecoM""of ,!I.. " i ..o.,. of • ••lti.,b.i• I' ' n
,..p.la.i.....
~ .t.o.- people'. ~.
,...;c.;, in .
no.. e-lol
nnl U ... .... ..i. Il •
octti.. S:
~
...... i....
I .. G ... d.h. pc• •&.. . . .. .. so ... llod to JO to IOIIrOCI like I. tun , f• • II, . l~" .... .d
...., ... .....n-. iIlfonaa tion,
,....,.z•••
sco rn p~ ,
_ ,- ~ -
.....,... = _ ,T.
-
, _
T.
..
\'- .
· · wor i
!
~ utisca loa... ...... 1
........ I . . ~ . bot they .'" _ ..,... d-.I ....,. ic iItIrIaaody.
TMy
_ _ _,
..-ld
ic
""".J ....
10
,u
tha. dICir ...t:
, be ...
~
ol
..... IIOL n doer. dlcy S .., ..idl , ~.i. ow .. ""i" . c1iff. .. tI. p lo. ...... dI.. coBI. fto ..
......edi> ,.. form. Ii..... ..Glorie.l itUwmotion. n>edl• .,.......... . t>
p," ..r
i .. m ,
•• d I.. wloa' .&.. 5....;•• Caood..
Uai-, SoII.rJo AJria ...... (as Casooda io dc¥cIopiaJ .... _ _,........
f...._.n:!
"'i.
n.
-..........u'
_
o.
th~ . .. w.. pr . ",0.1: ,hi • •i
.1>0".
- ,.
............ .,.-.
. . ....... .... ......... . ......... lIlitld
,.....!I.o ,.' 1
doaoJas N...... ripa) """' _ _............ .. dois_ of
,.,.s ao! ..... .....w _ . loiS eoUabon......
.....,u,o--.,
,.,..---
~
i .. ....I... d m. kes i .
....... WIooc all. doct tac:b _ • " . d lop ..... ,10. <.It.. ... 00.... f • ''''';. 'Y pau; lO.re. f... . 11 ioI.fonuIlioo i W-U Wol/ is rloc TWca io ooci.ti d <.It. 1<1. It.. . bca ol '1 . ... leo dlroDid•• 01 hioIh• • a-. So.1 ..o:;,.S ..,;, toko .... dUo role .pia .nd d lo p
.._. -..-----
ru.
_
in.Ioctcaet,. "ffermL I. """ ... re ly
i"•.,u
__ _-_----
!
So'Iiu 1.1..i _ "" . lo ked lOTS d i ce wi.h . n i ~ ~ ",pi il ! ""'" p\ooM.. Do rMsc DalI.aI r
m-Doul p;eo _ .... Jlobo.I
p1.ce. So II•• Los ""ro lu ...d G.doIupr:,...,.. . . IIot ..,. boooiaIl, .pply .... __ f'"'OCUS. I. ........ 1 S..I d ............ 1. . . . . . . . . tIM: Gr-t W.... 'or .-..pl&. I
.-..,........ _.......
..... . .." ..
,t r"""--'""""""
coUcbona-. 11. io _ . nIib ..... work ito du" i' Ioob fot
~
F........ orp.,,;a
........ .... 6Mlly. eoUabon..... loccw.... ill th. pcopk. ill <.It.. ........... &.. tIM: p_ _ , F'di pi. .. . .. dw: ~ .. bit All 01 doc-. coI.IciooS .-... doo h_ r this pbec i. ....... ...,. W bcln.. IiocoI ao! ~ .....w Ilk. Whol doct _ fot "' !IcaaK ..... of .. onL n . W.,u Woll i . OIl.
~ ............,;c.Apia, ir'. bnwocn oWK If'oupo. bot iI aIoo bas to do -..ith lb. r"..... 01 doc
twO_
oi ! w""" W
,..
....... n- dlcn ....., people '.
osbd a..;.....~Nacm. "-oria -Aa.ria•• alI Loliao &. .,.; '" p."';'d. IU.....,....-for ou_ p!• • CII.ia.cK Iaiotocr ilI.. .... 192Go. '!looT ....w
..
po,... .....
............... 'I1Ic:I:> rhoaao IocT'd of iaIonoolliOll ~ f...epI•• , "pl..." .. ha I i... . """"'P period. na on.! p ,. ~ r . .. ..pe . i u.1 illf . 11.1< c. Il , be
...,.
.... tho ,... d. lb I-r••• The "'-II.Ii_'. or- of pol.- """
01. . "\ridtt",....,.. M - " ...... odoa ClIl- - .
they~._
•
,..
............ ,.....
U "';tod S.._
_ b.owo _oc. yo . bow. It i•• 1 ,.. • -......r 0riDc0<........ ..., tIM: N _ AmcriI::ao>. ......... ao! .. ~ doq booc ... - . h . - . S O ...... doq ant .. _ tolUbcn...., P'O"P ia
~! ,"",-""'.' .... - - . r A - . l io ..,. ia, " W..u W Jl lou . .ilia in _
ofof _ i .. ............... wi pt cocrilooc
..li... d i . ..... JCOI'" plUc t n -k, aad . pplia i , OG ... ia ..".o....t ocalc.. 1, ...., bcijJ .... • n.inI WCltlol ,...,. .. m. U .. itod S,uu, we are real l, pooilioocd .., do....,h """' _ .... ' '' ' ..''..i 1 .. ole. W. bu•• . . . . pooi _ ... - .
m,n..;,.
thinp. I like I«iAJ ..... .,......, i .. the .......
_ I r o··.. loc • ....... a. 0l£1r" ... .. ... Uoc .... II ••d ..... 011 m..., .....-n.I rlioc-"" tbe:r lIII.&Ioo
I
-.pc-
....ny .... of
r i.. p u••• n d
f.. r thoi r
. . V..... I w p . b.. w . .tcrioIo ... doc paad otlOI ....,. ""... . -..Do pcriool of D_ fw
if ...,.
..o.!c.. 1 . 100 off9 fi oiQ or ri... i. dI . co ...p .Tioc • oemi•
CCTIOiolI.cDd,. • ..d ~ ..I..n
'0 bcl p "'• •
"'lp .her ... ,.,.. t •.,. ' " ..-tilloi'1!>Y
poiato d ""JOI.i..S . ..
•"........~ mcoplc. ....,. ... - impasto t&Chni
+'...
'R .................. t.-kc .......
I F e do... ;.f
_ .100....
--...me.--.,;m
......
I.Dd "" we arc ~ to <011 other', d; ~ 0 .. of m e lhiap I liIr.c ob-. ~
ee
-u,
is lh.. _ .... N1~by .... anod>er. TIw is p.nlr .. ~ I NO'< <><>I,. cumpIct.oo:Ibrolm,. pio
Ih '__ tt-=5 4
+R"a¥* ,
~"- "-"P'" -....r-.J. "'-' .,..baIo 100<::.,.
of cbe ,.....w.riDos 01 th e . ....... ~ _ . . !ocr: I!lMi!is oudl
... uetp '
ally
dil5coIIt I&Dpap
,... . _ I won oopdo... .. r-r ioIiOaI ... to . . Sc>oieI: li__ at . . ~.J of 1990. wloao,.... mOl Alui B. ' ..... . 1ylM: we e"
... &nil. ..bo YOUId be ";!lin, to _ _ • ", "'"'-W wloo .... work
........... .....,.
.
of''''
I , .",.", b", . 110 h. .J<-! to do rbc "'...... """ we oJ! Itm
__ = ...,nII..
we",
~ blc
o... _-. .~
r-r...w
or ..........., 0( the
coon olmac
the .......tonulioo 01. -'et7 of bdaDot -..idloaI:........, • • me,. ore thi..n.. ia wIuo. """r .... taliUc obo& ....... dioc.uio.. _ wiIm ...,. dIiM .0.- . . _ _ -Wo k if
.do"
ofl"...b.., , ~.. ,.... ... _
. . Whot lo=d>far io.~ ..1>0 i. thiDki"f . bo.1l ' he '
._tries,
a. ' ·' = ·
of<
T...
........................... 1iaIe
that nlmodr .... peapIt b>Dor it.
. . Yu. nor•• r• • " Iy fi • • ...illin of do..- ill th e w•• ld ~ doc ....,..... ond. I lbiak, that .-.Ily iIlB...,.,..;I. . . &co: 1Ibo'
&3 - 5
I I
Mdil>on
11;1"11.". \\.....
J a li. h .m-l
.bou.
dUnkinr onlr their prob how 10"" IOod Itld lI>OnIr:ho.<
"".k< . nd.
m. .. . ",d rood fh .
f.""m...
I", th i. """... ph... . .,;th the ;", paoo;hlc bur"""'""'r.
..... ~ .. ho""..
~
... ...... aa::Iooap by Ie..... 1 was • mincic dvt J ~ __ . ble • 1f.e1 fu . hco 1 ' 0' hack ... th . COiDO . , ' " - . .th • ,...,.... . U"","" .sa-. Alai --W....l _ bi, I t the w.u Wdf. Sh" " ol ,......... ....t I -W .... Ioi'" btitlJi"'I m-. bod -e- ,..._ to a i" u. u el .... doc ti,•• of tIoi. iDO, .l " f o r uoa pl. . o,, ~ of . he N o< ~ .... J..." dariBr ....... ~ ... IoM _ bc __ .--., hll.d ..... " - oWe., ~ thiI ~ doo-w- ... Go
•dn..mc.
boa""'"
~-r
....... doc"...;o.. il "" \. .. do.t I' .............. f • dl.e $oriel ti d e .. .",. Ed of doc T . -ti m uod di e f iD.D.i.1I _ i. -Alleno .tiTc
--
Cu...,.-
"'I"''''''''" .........
loold",
. . Y0<1 o, pO. ld "'do the "01Ip of w oo Ti " oraots d.iffu cady do p"'. .....
.rri",
s->et ..... Y _ b .. 6nr.m.. io._ _ 011990an. ,... W . . . . . . . ...., .........
--..... --_-_ _----..--.. _-_ .-.-.-_--_-...-.. __ ..L.-....-._ ~~-
...
-.
-.....-.
'0 _
"'.Yf<
. . Dap.ir. A 1"""' _ J dcopU. He....u.- dooo """, .. th . ",.,;:"""" " h I ..... k i. oc'! ~ r!x s-ict 11. . ripa _ .Hope .1 ...., tbiak doc:n to • 10< 01 there bcc:o_ people arc ~
Pori< ....w'"'" . bou< Judr""""'" .........1." •. iel• •hi. is . per-. ...... briap loopc ....t Fa ..... pft of i........... " ' liCe. M_,piopI< c:o=c 10 doc ....,..me: "" ... pari:; ......,. pcoplo"""" - . . oecc. oD
n.., ..
..... dUIclrc,,·.
. ......'L
r
opc""" , J _d, ..co iwed to
..
Ri,I" .. . ..d I tlliaL •• •
, c II&1•• that l"' ac l
os
_
~ n..F
~,. • • .. ~ oadAlWoi ~ oad
d ....eD
Ai.. ti .... '" N odat s...- Lacy• ............ J.ool ~ D f"..-.L ..... poia
tbi.,. "
ido
10
do • 0
" oILoboro te ...""'. . oliffu . p........, u rla. bcc:o_ q, doc Fmaislo r-P ........ Yen< cal«.
b ul poiaa
Nordic ;"'.,e. p."",.,.;.rie ud biJhlr ."..bDIit:.
dlcy doOded '" _ .......... . ,... bo l•• Wh u th . Fi do 're: doi. , i a., th..
.,....i0oi.
pc:opk
....,.,0I __ ......"li.' """-w.r
1'locy _
"'
• ........,.
-
obtrip- ... .
.,...._1iR
lor .. """"'"" d
--.,
0..01 . .
it tboir t-..
\ike.... biiad m• • thll Alai """'" i " the: .. c:n Aa odd "';,..;.lcrq beca_
..... ..... pa.o.do -en aoy <:ODl:It'f bet--
.,; ........ 2tUItI. ,..
.,....,....., ... ~
R-iooo 100 . 0ga. N...uniq Be,....·I ......
....... rel="nofollow"><:i ,,, JILli. Kiril l
air=. n.c: ...... :r- -w-l
0 0 I Mosc_ ' U'eft . .
aidai,.llI ... ' 0' • ride '0 the ...-;0. •• • Ill'" tIou. " U e dnauotic .........1fII ia wWcb " " spoke: ao Rasiaa ~
.u
Alai .. £.acIid>.
..
H o.... 1.e1 hou. of .. Ur.
of lie,
,k o p... ti", i. m. .. beCIIII C "" .....I•.,d,.
i.,
w...p In
poiD
du, ..... old mICIoi• ..,. It .';:11 i.
plocc""""
""" m.b for her
tbcn: .,jJ!
be ~ ...-;...
.....
1oJu:r1 ..... wtoidl ........
.......... J.aob
..
MIl Y"".....,. oold that ,.- fd . the f;i....iIJ:l . ni... upcri""""d •
r._
...u.
u.u-,I idot
_
-.. .. .... ... dolt dooc fipn it ..,;., '0 • _ k
bo:iar locW _
--..I . 0I . ~
_ud • IoiJ lou
....." Ic: _
~ ia
....lIdo I aale. .... ..bo ha.a ..... -.r .... U>t:c:teK. In doc Soooic:t
/lowcn &- peopIc., pnieM ..... i. ,001< fo ... pcopl. ' 0 C" 'Y d •• fl ... . .. h.ck ,.. ,h . ... . p'i .... . pCOfll< ..ho ~ ..d toide ~ 10ClUId ..u_ pbcwoc ""'" oM "'"' ... ........,. 10 JMy ohcir "'f'PO'"
Krico 01CUI_
''''.;0 coU.d n,
£.~
.i.
;" his
of
~ ~ e-..Io<,'"
'"'
I ..... ornoopd ' " J-.Iia ~ doc oniI< .. 1>0 hod boJpcd .. doc s....m .IlCptio.,;:_ . acl ..... ha.a loeco. •• friead.. .. wilOt doc U.."", S<:r
l-inc ~
-to • IoiIc distuoot
... ...., .....
""~ioIc&. D .... , . h. Ie.. ....i bl " ........ [ 1 1'1O- 1 9'91 ~ . _ .-,I< UJf o f ..do i. """
d.,.
'P'U'
fr.eczi
foe bccM • .I 10• .,<1 (IICOpI• • ped: .boou: doc Worii W'" " .... Iib .
li ttl .
f'j . .
..u..
i",
the• •
..........., u- doo. doiDr cooaId
.. ,.", i . I.u ·, dwop.. p....... - - . thi rel="nofollow">oI< _ G.Iiooo IoIoooi. oIf ..... Soric:, UAiOll tha' dod. liftt . ill 0"",,. ..... e..-iia.o '" "'-rib<
..",ponti l,. ~
w"p
_
n. ....
~
...
•
•
,, •
•
Judith F. Baca: Community and Culture in the United States
jcorra F.BACA is known nationally and internationally as a muralist and a public educator and has taught in the University ofCalifomia system since 198 1. Her commitment to community-based an making led her to foun d. along with filmmaker Donna Dieteh and artist Christina Schlesinger. the
Social and PublicAn Resource Center (SPARC) in the mid-1 970s in Venice, California. Through SPARG, Baca has not only facilitated the creation, preservation and documentation of public an in the Los Angeles area. but has also provided a space for the images and voices ofpeoples ofcolor. She has coordinated two major citywide mural projects in Los Angeles and has organized, along with the staff of SPARG, symposia and exhibitions that draw attention to the multiplicity ofcultures that make up the greater Los Angeles area and the nation arlarge. Her most famous mural, The Greal Wall ofLas Angeles (1976-1983) (Figures 1,2, and 3) extends for almost haifa mile along a drainage canal in the San Fernando Valley and documents an alternative history ofCalifornia, one that acknowledges the presence ofNative Americans. Asian Americans, African Americans. Latinos . Chicanos, gays and lesbians, and working class people. She has brought her coalitionbuilding skills to other parts of California, indudingthe farming community of Guadalupe, just north of Santa Barbara (Figu re 4), and the city of Baldwin Park.just east ofLos Angeles (Figures 5 and 6). She has also taken these skills and applied them to an international project, The World Wall: A VuionoftIu Future Wzthout Fear (Figures 7 and 8), a series of!0' by 30' portable murals that has traveled around the world, joined by similar panels painted by artists from the host countries. I first met Baca in 1988, when I invited her to speak to a women's studies class I was co-reaching at Pomona College. I was impressed by the nature
K'"-s StsuDa. 1996
Vol 25, pp. 215-%117 Reprints anilab&e direc:dy &om the: ~ Ph"""""yin, pamiaed by - . . oaIy
•
C 1996 OPA (On!neas Publishc:n&soriaricm) Amsrerdam B.Y. puNished in The NetberiaDds UDder 6cazse byGordoa and Bn:::ac::b. ScicDce PubIisbcn SA PriDccd in ~
216
FRANCES POHL
. " .::: • •j':
-
. ~
-::~ .:
,-.
. •"..::, 1
Figure I 77uGrt4t Wallo!LosA",elG.1976-8S,aaylic:oDconacte,lS·x2,43S·, Tujunga Wash dninageanal. San Fernando Valley. Group photogn.ph. summer1981 (JudithBac:a in center
or foreground group.)
of her work and her commitment to education, and subsequently organized a retrospective exhibition, judiJh E Ba&4: Sites and Insights, 1974 -1992, for the Arizona State University, Tempe Art Museum in 1992 (it appeared the following year at the Pomona College Montgomery Gallery). I interviewed Baca in her studio in Venice, California on July 10, 1994.
In a December 1993 interview of a Bill Jensen exhibition for the Y"l1lag. Voice, Peter Schj~ wrote: "There is DO art community, only more or less an art ,s ociety.,::".. Society is formal. Community is soulfuL Many in the art are so soul-starved they convince themselves ofbelonging to a community wh en they rea11ydon'L The art world is a fairly savage social -.
w" . •
JUDITH F. BACA
217
and economic zone where values are always in doubt and often in conflict." What has been your experience of this "savage" society and where do you see the "soulful" art community? .
My first thought is that the "savage" art world truly is a non-community. There's a certain brutality to it because it co-ops the truth of community and uses this language in such a way that people, particularly students, become extremely confused about professional group life. They talk about a professional group life as opposed to a community, which I would define more as a group ofpeople who have sharedvalues, mores, perhaps share a geographical space in which they ha ve to live in some way in relatedness and connectedness. I think what the art community is really about is disconnection. in the sense that we really fosterindividuation.Wefoster competitiveness. We foster within our an schools and universities the sense of inscantly disconnecting people from where they came to engage in the creation ofwhat is called a "universal aesthetic." and that"universalaesthetic" is essentially a western-European aesthetic and it's very specific. It's geegraphically specific, ethnically specific. It's intellecrually specific. And yet we call that "universal" and what happens is that people become very isolated. Right now we are recruiting the creme of the crop from our ethnic communities, for example the Chicano community. We're recruiting California students or people out of neighborhoods and we are putting them into the university and, as we recruit them and bring them in. we foster the disassociation from their origins. We say to them, "this is the highest form of achievement." It was put to me repeatedly-the highest fonn of achievement is to disassociate entirely, in totality, from where I came from. This means that, essentially, we're talting California taxpayer's money to recruit Califcrniastudents out of California neighborhoods so that they will never address the most salient issues. the most diflicult and incredibly troublesome problems. We take the best of them and we take them away. Essentially we're doing a brain drain of those places, so that we can never solve the problems that plague those communities. We have a continuing cycle offeeding people offinto this never-never land or nonspace of professional group Jife. Basically what it means is we serve corporations with those people. Those kids never come back to where they came from. The biggest, biggest struggle in all of my life bas been to stay connected in somry to where I came from . They've offered me every kind of ima ginable1@ody ifl would leave and even got as far as telling me rm a failure because 1 haven't.
218
FRANCES POHL
What I think is the future for w in terms of education is figuring out how to approach in a connected W;J.y what an-making is about-conneaed to the source ofyour own culture or ethnicity, connected to the geographic place that you came from. People would criticize that by saying, ·You're localizing and .therefore reducing the dialogue. You're keeping people from approaching global culture,· and so forth. But in tru!h global culture is coming back to the same kind of solutions that we need at a localleveI. We bave to work again in groups ofcollective consciowness. I would take our university system and teach kids cooperation. I would teach them relatedness. I would honor where they came from. I would teach them to stay sourced in wbat they know and their own cultures, and we that as the basis for teaching. And by doing that you do a number ofthings. You teach them that achievement does not mean ignoring issues ofhomdessness or gang warfare or the failure to educate large masses of people. It doesn't require looking down on the work ethic of the working class. This is asmming that these students are coming from backgrounds that allow them to think of those things as imporlanL
RighL And I think I'm talking about the majority here. I'm not talking about the tiny, select number ofpeople who go to university who are white and upper-class or upper-middle-class. I guess rmjumping a step ahead here to parity and to equity. We're wing a tax base for our educational systems that comes from the majority/minority and whether i(. in the California State University system or the University ofCalifornia system or the community college system we bave to educate those people or our democracy will fail. You can't any longer in good conscience continue to recruit from the majority/minority group without addressing this issue. When you say "majority/minority," are you saying that '~orities"are
actually the majority? 'That's right, Los Angeles, for example, is seventy percent people ofcolor. We bave to begin to address educa,ting according to the tax base or we are stealing money from the people. And it is my opinion that we are stealing money in an incredible way from the Mexican population. We have recruited for the University of California system-all nine universities-2,889 Chicano students. We bave graduated over two million Chicano students from California high schools. These statistics are for 1993-94. They are alarming. I don't think we can swtain any longer these highly rugged individualist notions. We can't. We have to cooperate because.we can't live here together anymore.
JUDITH F. BACA
219
It seems rather than cooperating in the face of shrinking resources,
people are diggingin and becomingvery resistant to sharingthose dim in. ishing resources. How do you think more of the people ofcolor ofC~or ni.aare going to make it into a university system that is state-run when the state itself is becoming increasingly reactionary in its attitu de towards people ofcolor? Are more people ofcolor going to be allow~ in or do you see that if they do come in, they're going to be turned into these individualistic kinds of people? Do you think that there's something much more radical that needs to bappen, in terms ofedncational systems in general? Are they salvageable ordo we really bave to look atsome otherway ofeducating people for community-oriented ways of tb.i.n.ki.ng? I think all of the above. Every aspect has to be dcalt with. I think university systems as a whole .w ill come under greater and greater fire. This last year alon e Cornell University, Stanford and the University ofCalifornia at Santa Barbara bad hunger strikes and walkoutsjust for the Chicano populations. These rwenty-year-olds now are getting in there and they're saying. "Wait a minute." They're becoming much more nationalistic. They're coming n ow with a very strong resistance to being assimilated and what I think is a very hcalthy rage. At the political level we are not making great strides, but we are getting people into key p ositions. What is going to happen is we're going to take the money away from them. The same way we had to do it with the arts councils and with the National Endowment. We had to attack the very premise of their funding to make them open it up. An African Atnerican scholar and organizer years ago told me, judy, you keep expecting justice bere because you think that if you are just logical enough and you convince people of what is j ust, they will simp ly open up the doors. They're never going to give it up easy. It has to be a struggle." So I think there's a two-prong approach. One is to start attacking the funding base of the university syste m and the educational system in general, and th e other is to start organizin g at th e student level, Now the counter-move of those opposed to change will be that they will abandon education, which is what is now happening within the local schools. The Save California Bill, sigoed by 600,000 people, basically says that any child of an immigrant wbo is now illegal cannot be educated. It alsosays they are not eligible for health care. People are running for political office 00 the basis of taking away those immigrant rights. Essentially that means that there will never be an other Amalia Mesa-Bains [California educator and artist]. Th"':"'Itne~et be another Judy Baca. We're looking at now an enOre generano~
220
FRANCES POHL
Oleay, now take that logically to the next step. We have eighty percent Latino school children entering into the Los Angeles city school system. A h ealthy number ofthem are not documented. I don't know the.percentage exactly. I guess we cait't measure it. But eighty percent of students entering kinderganen and elemen tary school right n ow are Latinos. Oleay, let's not educate them. Let's cut them loose . Let's put them all on the stree t, even p eople who have been here twenty years-my grandmother was here twenty-five yean and was never documented. You've got Chiapas in about ten minutes. We're going to have a ~ mtStizD riot. We're going to have armed resistance. How long do you think it will take these heavily armed kids. who are now cut loose from the school system, to turn the guns away from shoo ting each other and begin to come after those who are responsi-
ble for the conditions in their lives?That's what's going to happen. It's not sman to do this. It's not smart. It's stupid, If they reall y wanted to do something about immigriuion problems, they simply would go after the employers who have a great addiction to this cheap labor source. So we are talking about three areas ofresistance: stu dent protests, politicians saying, "Either do this or we take away your money," and people as a whole ""ring, "We don't want to pay for -your schools anymore and we'll collapse the entire educational system." Reactionary people will say, "Tough. We don't want to educate anybody." There will be a different kind of opposition to educational institutions within the Latino communities. People are saying more and more, -We .d on't want to do this. You either have to open it up or lose it." They have to see that they have access to education and that it's part of what they can do with their lives. No one should ever underestimate the commitment of the Latino community to education. They believe that education is the ticket out and they 're going to be enraged as soon as they get that they can't have it. And it's becoming more and more clear as the numbers become more extreme. I've been thinking about why this is happening and I can predict a few things. I think armed revolution is not out of the ques tion if there is a decision to destroy the school system and not to have access for our people. Recent repressive immigrant legislation, which will be eventually thrown out as unconstitutionaJ. may just push people over the edge. Fifteen yean ago I went before the Los Angeles city council and told them they had a gang problem that they had to approach now, and they said, "It doesn't effect us, we don't have gangs in the Valley.· The heads of the committees were from the San Fernando Valley. I said, "You will." These San Fernando Valley councilmen refused to 1001: at a city-wide problem. Los Angeles is now the gang center oCthe entire United States and right now is putting
J UD IlH F. SACA
221
satellite Crips in Arizona, for God's sake. We have satellites moving out to Albuquerque. I was in Albuquerque last week talking to people about the Crips and the 18th Street Gang. If you don't organize them and educate the m, then they will educate and organize themselves, because they are resourcefuL And if you don't give them an alternative, then they will create alternatives for themselves. Simple. But giving alternatives to this many people means giving up some of the power, access, education, wealth, and all those things that a small number of people have been used to having all to themselves fa.; all these years. Yes. Sharing resources, not getting to come to dinner and eat it all You have very. very intense resistance to this. and I tliink that's what you're seeing right now. Our major funders in America-
In a certain way I think it's easier to teach them connectedness than the opposite. When students come to the university they're in the process of building self-esteem, They're in the process of building an identity, and if you honor the identity they come with, if you tell them, "value what you have in your own pocket," you aetually build a healthier human being. For example, a young Korean woman came in with a photograph. It was a clcisonne medallion given to the bride and groom of two stork figures, one red and one blue, with a macrame cord. It's hung in the households of Korean families as a hridal gift to bring good luck to the bride and groom. For the student, it was just an object, one from which she was completely disassociated. She thou ght it was pretty but she didn't know the meaning of the object. She was going to use it in a still life that she was constructing for painting. I looked at the piece and said; "You can't make anything until you know it, until yo u understand its meaning. Have you ever asked your
222
FRANCES POHL
mother?" "No. I don't really know what it is." TI1at objea had hung in her household every day and had been so devalued by the culture at large that she never thought to ask the question ants meaning. So sending her back home for an interview with her mother and a discussion of its meaning made a far more valuable conneetion for her to that image. It became aeroally a reinterpretation of the American experience through a Korean position, a one-and-a-halfposition (someone with Korean parents bom in the U.s.). She could then we that image and aerually begin to understand the power ofits sources and why it resonates. Why does it move her? Why does that particular sound move you? Why are thowands of kids listening to banda music and dressing in western-like vaquero .oudits with the great big buckles and the hats and the boots ? Because it's a very nationalistic movement. Because they say. "This music makes me cry."Why does it make you 1:Ij'? Why does it move your spirit? So you need to do two things: number one, you need to affinn their own experiences; number two, you need to te:aeh a respeaful honoring of tradition. Now this is absolutely counter to everything we are taught, Within the art world we believe that whatever is new is better. Innovation is prized above all other things. making art about art with a new twist. The standard way of teaching at the university is to ask people to source in some other artist. Who is your influence? The references are usually to white men. someone who's hot or current. Students are then taught that they mwt follow in that line. So what if you said, as I have tried to do with my classes, · Forget thaL Make a tattoo. Study African scarification. Study the aboriginal marking of bodies as imprints on their soul What would you imprint on you r soul? Make a piece of work that has function within your daily life. Make it functional." That's another no-no. Ifit's functional, it's not art, Set u p problems, ask kids to take the resources of their own culture and their own experience and bring them into the class and share them. Talk about the experience ofothers, which is, interestiriglyenou gh, a common experience. whether you're a dominant-culture person or an ethnic person. Talk about the commonality ofimmigration and what that means. Honor a traditional form that is thought of as folk an or not serious art, Look at tattoos and grafliti and spray can arL Look at spray can art and see what these young people are making with those cans. which are incredible pieces of work. Study popular art that has to do with low-rid er cars. By doing this you shift the emphasis from a world that is commodified and controlled, a marketplace. You take away the very hasis of art making as commodification. a practice to feed an elite. and think ofit as a practice of h ealing. Make no object at all, but simply concentrate on the
JUDITH F. SACA
223
process. Devise a process that reminds you of the tradition of ritual sand painting or that is sourced in that and then apply it to a contemporary time and make no objea. Do students sometimes respond, "But how caD I support myselfas an artist making this kind of.art?"
Sure. I think there1s a great push now within the state university system to give stud ents pra etical skills, to male them employable. But my beliefis that if you want to be employable. then don't become an artist. Become a graphic designer, become a dress designer, become a hundred other things. Focus those things that are practical skills that can be used. Aaually. if you exercise yourselfand your intellect in these waysand also develop more theoretically or conceptually. in the end you are much mere em ployable as a fine artist as well because you are interdisciplinary. You can address the most important issues ofour time. Youare problem-sclvers based in reality. Youare not carrying on an intellectu al dialogue for fun and your frien ds. You can talk to your mother and father and are, in the end, a much better human being. You·have more practical knowledge with which you can serve the community and make the arts relevant again. I think artists have made a terrible mistake over the years. It never served us to be "inspired by angels," to be mythological creatures who are somehow touched by the gods. A dealer said to me once, "I only want to show artists who are touched by the gods." I remember her telling me that I wasn't touched by the gods. So I thought, "How do you get this touch by the gods? Who are these gods ?" Then I realized it was probably some white critic and if that white critic liked you, then you were touched by the gods . So I began to value. instead, what I understood and knew. I was terrified to death that I was going to be completely unemployable and completely a failure. There were no models for me to look. at as a woman artist, as a Latina, as a person related to community, so therefore I figured maybe I wasn't an artist. That was aetually incredibly liberating because then 1 could inven t myself. These kids have got to invent themselves.
0"
What about you own community, the one that has allowed you to survive as an artist?
On a spiritual an d emotional level there has been a community of wo me n, so me within my own culture bu t many not. Donna Dieteh was in-
credibly important in th e process ofme growing up to be an artist. She was doing the same thing but came from a completely different experience ofa very wealthy family..And Christina Schlesinger. Both taught me something
224
FRANCES POHL
incredibly important. They taught me to perceive myselfas entitled. I studied entidement with those women, because I had never seen anybody who felt like they deserved to have things. They really knew about entertaining themselves, getting what they wanted, feeling that they deserved to have those things, and I learned that from them. The women's community at critical points throughout my life has been really, really important-all of us struggling against male identities within the arts, there not really being places for us. And then parallel struggles. I've always been v~ connected to the African American community because of being bom in Watts. I grew up in African American and Chicano communities and developed very close relationships with key African American women who made present the parallel struggles ofother ethnic groups so that I could see things rationally. It widened my world. And then most imponandy has been an intergenerational connection with women and men older than I, like [actor] Gilben Roland. He was absolutely an amazing model for me. How did you meet him?
His wife called me. I had just done that Bill Moyers television piece and I was working on The Great Wall of Los Ang.1es (Figures I, 2, and 3) and Gia Roland called me up and said, "I want to work for you. I want to take photographs. Can I follow you around? I'm interested in what you're doing." I dido't know who she was, and so she showed up and literally every day of my life for nearly ten years she was with me. She cooked, too. Not only could she take photographs, but she could make wonderful memuJo. She fed me and fattened me up all ofthese years, making wonderful Mexican food . Then, ofcourse, I met Gilbert. Gilben was the VlUfl"TO' the ultimate VlUfl"TO. He had grace and was a man who refused to depict the Mexican people in a denigrated way. He was the "Cisco Kid." So many people later modeled what it was to be a Latino by virtue ofactions he took in his early films. His favorite words were honor; dignity, courage. He was stalwart, patriotic. All those things. So I had friends who were eighty. And then I had friends who were fourteen, who gave me a sense ofthe range ofthe world I lived in. They really gave me a sense of perspective. I think thatnunured me. Jane Rule [Canadian writer] was the only lesbian I ever met in the early 1970, who was totally connected to community. notjust an isolated women's community but a community filled with all ages and types ofpeople. All these people had in common an incredible grace. Minnah [Agins] had the same grace. You .know, this is really making me emotional because so many of them are
c;
C
o
~
Figure 2 11u Grtal Waf! of LOJ Ang,zlJ. 1976-83. The 1930s: The Illusion or Prosperity.
/
.
'
~.
..
'.
"T1
~
o m
en
(3
:z: r-
Fipre 5 71v t;mI Wall "'1M A"fIIn. 1976- 85. The I94Os: Japanese InternmenL
JUDITH F. SACA
2Zl
dead, the eighty·year-<>lds and the fourteen-year-olds. I feel such a sense of loss for Gilbert. H e died the way he lived, too. Right to the en d he wouldn't take his damn boots oil! Minnab was important, too . She gave me a sense of a historical context, She told me about the hunger strikes and the bread strikes and the Detroit auto workers and I felt like I had met all these characters. I Could see first-hand what they went through to do the most basic things, like.get us unemployment insurance. Was this in the 1930s? Yes, 1930s, the intellectual Left of the thirties. Minoah was the con tinuation ofa long line of people who used an. When I put together her retrospective for her memorial I looked over the range of all these prints. It was an absolutely wonderful chronology of Left an making and issues that ranged from the 19305 or late 1920s to the 1980s, when she died. You could see the preoccupations of the Left. through all these different de-
cades. I learned strategies for survival from the fourteen-year-olds and eighty-year-olds, and also from staying connected to the humblest peop le, people who would not necessarily do good for your career, and with m y &nU~
.
Have your experiences with these people affected th e way you approach your own work as aD artist?
Cenainly. One thing they have taught me is to r ecognize the unrecognized seats of power. like the woman who looks out her window and watches the kids at the hus sto p. That's a key role in the way that community moves. She keep s them fro m j u mping out into the street. The gang that occupies the park, even if it's usually only a few little guys. Some of them are often much more harmless than they're perceived as being. Acknowledging these people. It'sjust the same as saying, "That tree is there. " You don't pretend that the tree's not there. And you don't try to cut it down.
No. You don't say, ·Well. everything would be just great about this piece ofland if the tree wasn't there." Instead. you come into a space and begin to figure out who's who. You look at the synagogue down the street, the passage of these p~ple on a weekly basis past the site where the mural will be. The school. a!If the movement in and out of people who come from some distance. The local people across the street and their investment in
being middle-class. Understanding what it is that they valu e. who they are.
228
FRANCES POHL
Recognizing those with -the power and recognizing who's there. And then recognizing what is u nder the surface, almost like a spiritual half-life in the ground. Why do people get drawn, for example, to those exquisitely beau-
tiful sites along Galiano's Coast where the Haida have been coming for potlatches for a few thousand years. People are drawn to those places and they have a certain presence in the world by virtue ofthe spiritual investment of people for centuries. That's why you need to know what has happened there. You need to know who was there, who's there now and what is op erating on them from another time. It's like digging up, revealing, digging away layers of information to the source ofit. Your words remind me of the series of murals you did for the farmwork.
ers' community of Guadalupe, California. Yes. The imagery in those four murals is an uncovering of the roots of the place. The ethnic contributors panel shows the Chinese as well as the Mexicans. A Swiss-Italian marble angd from the town's ce metery is the source of the central image in the Futun 4/ Gtwdnlupe (Figu re 4). Yet Guadalupe is also like every farming area. Farmwerkers' issues are international issues. I respect both the Iocal issues and their international ramificatio ns . I want to build associations, relationships. I was taught to make family and to honor the family and that's what I do with the site, I
make it family. I tty to create order within that family, to develop some kind of community in order to approach the issue OT the site and to become makers and problem-solvers together. Do these families ever become dysfunctional? Always is probably the case! Of course. that assumes that there is a per' fect famil y out there somewhere.
Then there is that other "family" setting, the classroom or university, where conflict and dissention has increased as increasing numbers of people are coming in who want to see their identities reaffirmed and their cultures studied? How do you deal in a constructive way with this inevitable confiict? Well . right now there isn't really any resolution e xcept that if you're in charge, you win. People are not saying, ' Okay, how do I make room for inclusion?" University pro fessors often suffer from the same absence and
poveny of thought that OUT students suffer from when we don't teach them relate dness. We don't teach them to connect. So who we have reach..
JUD ITH F. SACA
229
Figure4 1'1u Fuluru{Cu.4IltJ.upe, 1988-90. acrylic on wood. S' x 7'. One cfthe fcur paecis on the history and futureol'Cuadalupe. CA. Municipali ty ofGuadalupe. Photo: Cia Roland.
iog and who we have as models are people trained in the old system. who really believe that individual achievement is to be valued above all things. We should begin as scholars address in our writing, in our thinking, how we're going to move into this 21st century. into a really different time. I mean it's astounding how different it is. I have an incredibly difficulttime keeping up within my own culture, with the changes. as it becomes " Ladno" as opposed to "Chicano" and Chicanos come into positions of power and they have to reevaluate themselves because they can', speak for El Salif one of us can ever begin speak an y longer for vadorans. I don',
'0
the whole.
to'"
• .
,
'0
230
FRANCES POHL
Where do yon see a commonality coming into play? Is it possible? I guess what I'm advocating, for the most part, is working in smaller groups. We have to go down to smaller groups and
Yes. Not integration in the total sense, all ofus together, one planet, one people, all hnlding hands I don't think we wiD. Not in my lifetime. I've worked really hard for twenty-five yearS to make things different and I've watched most of the gains rolled bad. What about these gains? You've done local work, but you're also out there
on the national level, dealing with the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and with national commissions. There appears to have been, at least until recently, an Iaereaee in NEA funding for community organiza.. deas. Is this good or bad? Where do you see it going? I think the NEA is not a good example because you probably would not see more money going to community groups from the NEA. But you do with organizations like the Lila Wallace Fcundanea, the e. e. cummings Foundation, the James Irvine Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation,
JUDITH F.SACA
231
geles. It is the opposite afthe Convention Bureau, which puts out videos that say you can come to Rodeo Drive and to Universal City and they don't show one person ofcolor. OUT program is very different.·It takes tourists around the city to places like The Gnat Wall. People are .enraged about it. We got calls all the way from the U.S. DepamnentofCommerce. They fear that community-based people will destroy the tourism industry in Los Angeles, which means, basically, that we will share part of the wealth. You want to kn ow what happened to Rodney King? Let's go out to Pacoima and the Foothills Division police station and hear the perspectives ofcommunity leaders. People are being given an alternative for the first time. And all of the tours are sold ou t during the World Cup soccer games. Yesterday I addressed a group of American Studies scholars from Syria, Israel, all over the world. There were forty chairs of American Studies Departments in various universities all over the world at The Great Wall. They want to know about race relations in America. They want to know if there is apartheid here. They want our perspective on what is happening. It's pretty exciting. There are spaces in between being made.
Do you see any down side to the increase in funding for community-based ventures by the foundations you just mentioned? Absolutely. The Lila Wallace Foundation bas been the most problematic. They've been giving major amounts of money-5 million dollars-to the Mark Taper Forum to expand their audiences. Not to build a Chicano theater in Los Angeles. but to put Chicanotheaterunder an all-whiteboard of directors that comes from the very basis ofpower and authority in Los Angeles.Hke the Chandlers of the LosAngtUs Times. You're never going to get that board ofdirectors to change. So what do they do? They go to a Mo:icano, Jose Luis Valentino, who was at the Los Angeles Theater Center (LATC) with the Chicano theater. Mind you , he's Mai<mw. That's very critical because a Chicano would never have done it. A Mtri&anc will. Because they're not born, raised here. They don't know the politics. They always feel like they can make an alliance with the Anglo. They don't have the history of racism from birth, so they're a little more negotiable. So instead of giving him the LATe when it goes under, the Mark Taper Forum says, "Hey, there's a talented young guy. Let's get him.· So they got him. They bought Chicano theater. Five years from now there won't be a Chicano Theater Center. There won't be a parallel group to the music cen~er that is ethnically run and governed and developed. There will be an inCorporation within the music center ofChicano Theater. When he leaves they'Ujust get a replacement, Maybe at th e end of five years they'U h ave
232
FRANCES POHL
one Chicano on the board. They'll have all of our mailing lists. They'll have Latino theater with out the control of the Latino population. There are many examples ofthis kind ,o f funding, which is not about self-empowerment, Now, people would argue with me vehemently about this. But I hon estly believe that the only thing to do in terms of cultural d evelopment in Los Angeles is to develop parallel institutions of equal size and stature for the ethnic populations. But wouldn't you end up still having to accept money &om these same institutions? I ha'I'C another quote I wanted to read to you from Octavio Pars recent collectiou Essay. on Maican Art (1993): ~'The idea ofpuhlic art strikes me as a sentimental nostalgia and a dangerous anachronism. .• Public art has invariably been the religious an ofa state oro!a church as powerful as a state. By definition, there is uo such thingaspuhlic art made by isolated individuals or private groups•• • • The phrase 'revolutionary public art' Dot oaly contains a coD~dictioD but is, in fact, meaniDgless .• •only through an abuse oflanguage • • • is it possible to speak ofa rev0lutionary art sponsored by the state."
Well, there's some validity to what he 'says. Yet if you look at The Gmu Wall, it received a certain amount of public dollars but it also received such
a patchwork offunding from so many different sources that no one source could control the conten"t of the piece. American philanthropic giving is not the same as Mexican philanthropic giving. They have no philanthropic giving in Mexico. They have patronage and they have government spons orship, which is very direct, We have this other thing called nODprofit giving. I think it's still possible, with multiple funding sources and with an artist who is uncompromising, to create work that does challenge the status quo. I think my Bald win Park Metrorail Project is quite revolutionary (Figures 5 an d 6). It really chall enges the whole colonial missionary sys tem.
Did the people in charge know what you were doing? Absolutely. Because I explained it to th em. And because there were enou gh Latinos in that group. There were also people from Arkanqs There was an African American woman who came from the oldest black famil y in Baldwin Park. The head of the Department of Educadon for Baldwin Park was Latino. The mayor himself was a twenty-four-year-oJd graduate of Harvard. a Latino . There was a Chicana. a working
JUDITH F. SAGA
233
..:
• i ~
I
"0
8 ••
'" ~
,,;
.e"c
'i
:E
•
:1;,"-. "·" rr. '
I. .
• , '(
I ,#, ~!/ ~. 'l. .j t " .lot \ "
•- •
.
.
I.
: ,
. ,.....
- ~
. - .-". :
. ~ .~ . . ~:...-.~;;~.::
. ..
.~£ -. -.~.
--. . .
'"-'--"
.."
,!!!,
-" -" u
" • "0..
'"
".
-<: ', ' ~
""'; C
. .
-
~
;
:>t
.!! -e
•e
~~ . "
-e "
. ...
.•'.
.. :
•
•:z•
.;
-
0> 0>
,;
~
:.§
.!:•
~
1!
.e
j
.ll ~
~
Z
~
FRANCESPOHL
abou t the who le issue of the m<stiftu or mixing of races. The only problem I had was with one of the Catholics. The woman was working<1ass and vely Catholic. She j ust wanted to make sure I wasn't going to offend the padn from the local mission. And then when I turned him upside-down on his head in one of the images, I said, "You know, Lupe, I'm turning him upside -down and, I'll tell you the truth, in native sign language it means ' not'." And she said, "They shouldn't have done what they did." Who, the padns? Yes, the padres. That's what she said,linaiIy. Right on, Lupel But I gave them a complete an historical lesson. I brought the research in. They were with me through the whole process.
-so they were n ot only engaged through the whole process, but had decisiODamalring power, rather thaD simply beiDg in aD advisory position.
That's right. It was remarkable. Not to say they were all liberal and incredibly progressive thinkers. They said , "We want you to do something on the missions," and I think they thought "Taco Bell" They wanted my name recognition too. They wanted to say they had Judy Baa in Baldwin Park. It's interesting. They didn't really get what that meant. They just knew that I was a famous mural painter and I was a Chicana and had worked on projects with young kids . When they told me the subjea was the missions, I said, "Okay, I'm going to do the missions but I have to tell you, I'm going to do the truth." ' Well, we wouldn't expect any less; they said. So when I started developing the information I started bringing it in because they met with me as I was progressing to the design. I started to tell them the numbers ofpeople who were murdered, the numbers of native people lost. the loss of their names. It was really also about my passion for what I was doing and my belief system. I brought in Vera Rocha , the chiefof the Gabrieliiios who lives in Baldwin Park, as an advisor for the project. And they know her. They've always known her because she had pow-wows in their parks. And she has rwenrytwO grandchil dren who who are all native people there. Her fu.mily grew up in a mission. Her great-grandmother made candies. She hates the mission . She wouldn't even step on the ground. She stood on the outside waiting for me when I went there to pick up niaterials. So convincing people was a combination of my passion and my abiliey to articulate it and Vera's ability to speak to what it meant to her. The mission father's didn't participate except to impede the informational Bow. But I had historians who , helped me and I just started bringing in material I said, "FIrSt let me tell
JUDITH F. BACA
&UJw;n.-
235
Sl4tWn. 1993. Loading platfonn. parking lot with plaza in background. sle-'COlor Plate 11. Figure 6
236
FRANCES POHL
you what I'm going to do. Do you know what an archaeological dig looks like?" "No," they say. So I had to go through all these photographs ofarchaeological digs. That's how I began. I showed them photographs ofarchaeological sites. I really like the way they look. "I think this should be like an archaeological site," I said. "We're going to dig it up. We're going to dig it up and we're going to putit back in the ground. We're going to puJI away the layers of the earth, IiteraIly, and see." Then the forms in the ground. the shapes of the mission, the native village, became the design in the concrete. And they really liked that. I was listening to Lupe talking to SOme kids on the of the dedication. She said, "Well, just think of itthis way. It's like she took a big steam roller and she smashed everything flat, " which was a pretty dose description ofwhat I didl I wed the language ofthe rednecks in the piece: "It was better before they came." And then there's GJo. . ria AnzaIdl1a sandblasted into the big arch: "This land was Mexican once, was Indian always and will be again." And the words of this extraordinary young Asian woman, who said. "You know, it's not the adults leading only. it's the youth leading too." And so I wed that too. I had such a good time doing it. It was diflicult working with the eontractors. And the commjssion.fough~me on a couple ofthings. which I lost. I lost the benches in the plaza area. I wanted people to be able to sit in the plaza by the monument. And I wanted them to be able to cut 1IDfI4liIDs. I wanted edible food in the planters. I did get the oak tree. which represents the indigenous people. and I got the cactus. but not edible cactus, and I didn't get the benches because they didn't want people hanging out. So I didn'twin everything. But I really felt like it was successful. And they seem very happy with it. The mayor told me. "I go to the Metro station and I sit on the bench and look down at my feet and it says ' memory' and 'will power' and I remember what myjob is today." That's how you preserve a culture. It can still happen.
dar
Fogurc7 (Top) 77>t WoridW"u,A y.......f "";w.,. W...... _.1987-92.AaylicoDCID. 10' x SO" panels. ~:J~ IamDarion at SaDIa Buban County Courthouse. !D additiDDlD tbcfour paucbbyllaa~of"'H...u.-, Triua(>Aoftlw H.n. and N".".w.lmIlcrir m). chis imnlb tiOn included anistA1aci BegWs pazu:l71w E"" .ftlw n-N<4 e - , (1990) 00 lhc brld'taod the paoc1Dio/Qp< ofA1umDlioc (I1lllO) 00 tho brrigluby FuuUsh_JuhaSaslO.sab-Uisa Loob, aodAno MatioIauri. Soda! and Public: An ResourceCcmcr. Photo: Bob deBris. "*So
Figure 8 (BollDm)
T..""",,"'f""Hum. 1987-89,AaylicoDCID.... 10·x !O·. Socia1aod
Public Art Resource Center. Photo: Gia Roland.
1\ JUDITH F. SACA
237
C O N N.C Tl VE AE STH ETI C S, AIll T ", 'TEIll INOI Yt D lI "' l ISI'I } S ill.
hIve been intern.lind by our whole culture andmade to pervade every experience. It is nor hud to sec how the inl1ituliorn and praClices of the aft world have been 'nodded on the same configurations of power ana profit that support '1a maintain our socie~Y'1 dominant worldvlew. Th is - business as usual" psychology of affluence is now threatening the ecosystem in
G.ifi4
which we live wilh its dysfunction al values and way of life; it is a single system manipu lating the individual into the spiritually empty relationsh ip of the producer to the prod uct.
As a critic in the nineties, I am not really interested in writing catalog essayl or art reviews. w hat I am concerned with is unde rstanding the nature of ou r cultural myt hs and how they evolve-c-rhe institut ional framework we take for grant ed but which nevertheless determines our
Many people arc aware that the .ystem isn't working, th at it is time to move on and 10 revise the destructive myths that guide us, O ur entire
lives. One question that has preoccupied me, for instance, is what it means
cultural philosoph y and its narrow ness of concern are und er int ense scru-
to be a "successful" artist working in the wo rld toda y, and whether the
tiny. Among snhu, there is a greater critical awareness of the social role
image that co mes to mind il one we can supp Ort and believe in. Certainly
of art, and a rejection of modernism's bogus ideology of nClllrality. Many
it seems al if tha t image is undergoing a'radical re-visionie g at lhis lime. Th e dom inant modes of thin king in our society have cond itioned
artists now refuse the notion of a co mpletely narcissistic exhibitio n practice as the desirable goal for art , Fo r inua'nce, perfor mance aTlist Gu illenno
us to characterize art primarily as specialized ob jects, created not for moral or practical or.social reasons, but rather to be cont emplated and enjoyed,! Within the modern era, art was defined by its auton omy and self-suffi- • eiency, and by its isolation from the rest of society. Exposing the radical autonomy of aeseherics 11 lo mtthing thu is no t "ne utral" but is an active participant in ca iulist ideolo has been a rimar accomplishment of
G6 mez· Pena n ates: "Most of the ...c rk I'm doing curre ntly comes, I think, from rhe realiu tion that we're living in a state of emergency. , . . I feci thar- -. more than ever we must step outside th e strictly art arena; It i. not enoucii to make art . In a similar vein, arlS admin istrator Lind a Frye Burn ham na claimed that gallery art has lost ill resonance for her, especially gallery art by what she terms "white yu ppies.- "T here is too much going on outside, ~
t e aggressive ground-clearing work of deconn rucric n, Autonom y, we now see, has con demned art to social impote nce by turn ing it into just
she says. "Rcal life is calling. I ca ll no longer ignore the clamor of disaster-economic, spiritual, enviro nmental, polit ical disaster- in the ....or ld
another clan of objecu for marketin and conI um tion .
in which I move." Perceptions such as these are a direct challenge to th e
amc prod uction and consumption, competitive self-assertion, and the maximizing of profiu are all cru cial to ou r society 's notion of success.
artist's norma tive .e nse of his or her role in the world: at stake is one's
Th ese same assumptions, leading to maximum energy now and mindless waste at the u pense of poore r countries and of the environment, have also
M
J;,
............ ....
personal identity in relation to a particular view of life that ou r culture has made available to u ~, Th at the art world 's values, structures, and behaviors arc in great
become the formula for global destru ction . Art iuelf is not some ancillary
ferment has been evident for some lime, and the deconstructions of the
phenomenon but is heavily impljcated in this ideology. In the art world,
eighties continue to reverberate pr ofou ndly. A climax in these up heavals
we are all aware of the extent to which a power-ori ented, burea ucratic
was reached for many with the cont rovers ial 1993 Biennial at the Whitney
professionalism has promoted a one-sided, consumeristic attitude towa rd art. ln srlturional models based on n oti ci~s of prod uct develop ment and
Museum of America n Art-the fi rst multicultural and political Biennial-
career achievement echo the stereotypic patriarchal ideals and values that
professional elitism and th at its closed, scM-referential ranks are under
"
which demon strated that the art world is-undergoing a dismantl ing of ill
"
COHH I C TI VI AIIT H IT' C h AU A" I.
heavy siege. Much o f t he new art foc uses o n soc ial creativ ity rather th an on self-expressio n and co ntr adicts the myth of the iso lated gen ius=private.
' N D I V'D"' A~lI H
.In cOfllidering the implicat ions of t his · sea chang e: one th ing is
clean-to be able to see Cl,lrrent aest hetic id eolo gy as actively co ntr ibu ting rc ,
su bjective, behind closed doors in the studio, separ.He fro m o the rs and the
the mo st serio us p rob lems o f ou r ti me means break ing the cultu ral trance
world. As I shall ar gue in this uu
and requi res a change of heart . The wh ole fram ewo rk of mod ernist aes-
creativity in the mod ern wo r l
go ne an In an with ind ivid ualism and hu been viewed stricti a
n
th etics Will tied
to
the objectify ing conscious ness o f the scientific world -
indi vi ua p enom eno n. I believe this conceptio n o f art is o ne o f the things
view; like scien tists, artists in o ur cultu re have been co ndi tio ned not to
th·at are now cha nging.
wo r ry about the ap plicatio ns or consequences o r moral purpose o f their
As t he work o f ar tists w ho are d iscussed in this book makes clear, there is a d istinct shift in the locus o f creativi ty fr o m the auton om ous, self-
activ ity. It is enough to genera te resulu. But just as the shortcomi ngs of " obiective ~
sc ience are becoming apparen t, we are also begin ning to ~ r
contained ind ividual to a new kin d o f d ialo gical st ruc tu re that freq uen tly is
ceive how the reductive and neutrali zin g aspects of aesthetics and "art for
not the p ro duct of a single indi vidu al but is the result o f a co llabo rat ive
art's sa k e ~ have significantl y removed art from any living social co ntext or
and interdependent pr ocess. As an ists step ou t o f t he old framew ork and
moral imperative excep t t hat o f acade mic art hino ry and the gallery sys-
recon sider w hat it mean s to be an artist, they are recon stru ctin g the rela-
tem . We are beginni ng to perceive how, by disavowing ar t's communal
tionship between ind ivid ual and co m mu nity, between art wo rk and publi c.
dim en sion, t he romantic my th o f au to no mo us ind ividu alism has crippled
Look ing at art in ter ms of soc ial purpo se rather than visual style, and
art's effect iveness and influ ence in the soc ial world.
sett ing a high priority on ope nn ~ss to w hat is O th er, causes many o f ou r
T he quest for freedo m and au to no my has been now here belle r
cherished no tio ns to b rea k down: the vision of b risk sales, well- patro nized
mari zed for me tha n in these comments by the painter
galleries, good reviews, and a large, adm iring audience. As Richard Shus-
publi shed in the cata log of his exhibition at th e Whitechape1 Art G allery
terman writes in Pragmatist Aesthetia , "T he fact that ou r entrench ed
in Lon d on in 1983:
.
.
inst itutions o f an have lo ng been elitist and opp ressive does no t mean that they must remain such.. .. Ther e is no co mpelling reason to accept the narr owl y aest hetic limits imposed by the established ideolo gy of aut on omo us art. ~ In Feb ruary 1994, I had occasion to tape a co nversat ion wi th the art dealer Leo C aste lli, in w hich he co m mented abo u t t he Whitney
The Imiff is not respomible to .nyone. Hissocial role is ,!Social; his only mpon.-__ sibilit., consists in ,:III altitude to the work he dots. There is no rommNni, . tion with . ny public whlftlonJel'. The .rtist ' . 11 ,u k 110 questioPl, . nJ he m.kcl no Jt.tcmel1tj he offen PlOinform. tion, . nd hi' WICI rk '.nnot be NUJ. It i' the end product whichcounts, in my ra le, the picture.
show: - It was a sea change, not just any chan ge. Because I had to accep t the fact that the wo nderful days o f the era that I pa rticipated in, and in
Mor e tha n a de cad e o ld, these co mments by now may sou nd hope.
wh ich I had played a su bstantial role, we re ove r. ~ In Has Modernism
lu sly out of da le, bUI in a more recent inle rview in Art Neun, it was d ear
Failed? I w rote , "G enerally speaking, t he d ynam ics of p rofessionaliza-
that the artist had in no wa y altered his views. "Th e idea of changing o r
tion d o nOt dispose artists to accept their moral ro le; professionals are co n-
improvi ng the wo rld is alien 10 me and seems ludicr ous, " Baselitz said.
dition ed to avoi d thinkin g about pro blems th at do no t bear di rectly on
"Societ y fun ctio ns. and always hu, without the artist. No aniSl has ever
their work. ~ Since writi ng th is a d ecade ago, it seems as if the pictu re has
changed anylhi ng for ben er or wane. ~ Hidden behin d the. e com ments is
changed. The politics of recon ceptualiution hilS begun, .nd the search
for. ""' Iscnda fOl' an has become .. conaciouI aeuch.
....................,..01...
the pen on.1 and cultural myth that has formed the anisl" idencity in che
_...... Plaubm wrote .t die ~ 01 11M modern en" -daM OM CU CAl,. bear it by 1voidinl it. And diu can be doM' by lim. in lhe world of -"." Por Jean-Pau l San re, the ea-i.fencial trut h of the hum . n . iroltio n WI' iu contingency, man', . en' t that he doe. not belong-i. nOt nt ecnary-to the unlvene. Since life Wif arb itrary and meaningleu. Sartre advised th.t we mun . J1 learn to live without hope. and the English w rittr Cyril Connolly summed up a whole cultural t lho. of alienation with these no w legendary
comments: "It is closing time in the gardensof the West. From now on an artist will he judged o nly by the reson ance o f hi, loJitude and the qua lity
of hi. despair." Writing about thi. form of ~ntological distrust. this vote of "no confidence" in the universe, Co lin Wilson in An lntrod"ction to the NnJI E:tisttnt~ IiJm refen to th e parad igm o f . lieRu ian as the "futility hypothesis" of life-the nothingness, estrangement, and alienation that have formed a considerable pan of the image we have of ourselves. My friend Patricia Ceuc, who teaches at the Kansas City Art Institute, now refers to this particular mind-set as "bad modernism.- In a course she gives on refl"1lming the self, her students are in struct~d about the danger of believing that humans(whether they are artist! or not) are somehow outside of, or exempt from, a responsibility to society, or to the environment. Wehave been taught to experience the self as private, subjective.... separate, from others and the world. This notion of individualism las so completely structured artistic identity and colored our view of art that even for an mist like Christo, whose public projects such as Running Fence and the more recent Umbrel/oU require the participation and cooperalion of Ihousands of people, inner consciousnessis still dominated by the feeling of being inde endent, solitary, and separate. In an interview in Fwh An ,
The wor. of .lIIrt is irtlu;onAl'A"dprrh.ps il7rspomiblr. Nobod, nrrds it. Thr UlOrk isAhugr indifJiduAlisricgrstJI rf tb.t ~ 'i nrirel, drridrd b, mr.... Onr of thr fl'"ttItrJt contrihutioPls ofmod"." .tt is the notion of itrdifJ;Ju.lism. .•. I think thr .rtist CAn do .",t.bing h r "'lUlU to do. Tbis is",h, 1UJOuld Plt tlr r Aeupt . wmmiuion. Independrncr is most importAnt to mr. Th; work of.rt is .. JeTr. m offrredom.
"
---u..
, amno.._ of IrwcIom" m. CfC' pc_t mon1 impennv. t hlt eontin Ueli to be llnndiahed politici lly II we"' .. philolophicilly in . 11 the modern u aditionl 01Wenern thoulht. It revu N r&tt d loudly in the int ense controversy that r&V'd for senTlI Yelrs over the proposed removal of Richard Serra's commissioned Iculpmre TIlled Arc from ill iite at Federal Piau in downtown Manhattan. Although conceivedIpecifically for the site, the seventy-three-ton leaningcurve of weldedsteel, which was installed in 1981 by the government'S Art in Architecture Program, proved so unpopular and obstroclive to local office workers that they petitioned to have it removed. Al one employee of the U.S. Department of Education stated at the time: - It hu dampened our spiriu every day.11 has turned into a hulk of rusty steel and de arly,at least to us, it doesn't have any appeal.It might have artistic value but JUSt not here ... and for those of us at the plaza I would like to say, pleasedo us. favorand uke it away." Serra's response, awash in the spirit of "bad modernism," was to sue the government for thirty million dollars because it had - deliberately induced" public hostility toward hi. work and tried to have it forcibly removed. To remove the work, according to Sem, was to destroy it. Serra sued for breach of conlract and .iolation of his constitutional righu: ten million dollars (or his Ion of sales and-commission, ten million for hum to his arlistic reputation, and ten million in punitivedamages for violation of his rights; In July 1987, the FederalDistrice Court ruled against Serra, and in March 1989, the s~ulpt ure wu removed(rom the site. What the TIluJ Arc controversy forces us to consider is whether an that is centered on notions of pure freedom and radicalautonomy, and subsequently inserted into the public sphere without regard for the relationship it hu to other people, to the community, or Any consideration except the pursuit of art, can contribute to the common good. Merely to pose the question, however, indicates that what has most distinguished aesthetic 'Philosophy in the modern paradigm is a desire for art that is absolutely free of the pretensions of doing the world any good. -I don't know what public art is, really,- the sculptor Chris Burden once said. - J jUst make art. Public art is something else, I'm not sure it's art. I think it's
"
..
.,
about a social agcnda.· Just u disintere sted and ·vatuc-frcc· scien ce con u ins no inner rescraint within iu methodology that would limit what it
" ,0{; ~ U·of ~hich brings me directly to the question of whether art can build commu nity. Are there viable alternatives to viewing the . e1f in an
f« ls entitled to do, ·value-free" ae. theticism reveals nothing about the .
individu alistic manner? And if '0, how docs thi l affcct our notio n of
limiu art should respect, o r the commu nity it might serve.
",ucccu· l Can arti Stsand art insti tutions rcdefine th emselves in leu spec-
Moderni st uschetics, concerned with iculf u th e chief source of
tato rially ori ented waY' in order to regain the aperience of interco nnect-
value, did not inspire crcatin participati on; Nither, it encouNiged discanc·
edness-of subject and object intenwining-that was lost in du alistic
ing and depreciation of the Other. It. non relatio nal, ncninteracrive,
"Enlightenment philosophies, w~jch construc~ "t he world as a spectacle
nonparticipacory o rientation did not easily accommodate the more femi-
elne;...lves of c~Md comp anion, of te eing and ~es ponding to need..The
to be o bserved from afar by a di, embodied eye? "When Cslifornia artist Jonathan'Bo rofsky and his collaborator,
notion of power that is imp lied by asserting one's individuality and having
Gary Glallman, traveled in 1985-86 to three different prisons in Ca liforn ia
o ne's way through being invul nerable leads, finally, to a dcadening of
in o rder to make thei r video d~u mentuy Prisrmen, they did not go in the
empathy. The model of t he artis t"u a lone genius suuggling against society
mode of network reporters intending to oburve It a distan ce and then
does not allo w us to focus on the beneficial and healing role of social
describe the conditions they found. Instead the y went to listen to the
interaction, nor does it lend iuelf to wh,~ p hilosopher David Michael
po.onen in o rder to try and understand their plight. The y want ed to
Levin calls · enlightened listen ing," I listening thac is o riented toward the ...
unde rstand for thems d ves what it mea~ to be a prisone r in this society,
achievement of shared understandings, As Levin writes in Thc Limning
to lose you r freedom and live you r life locked up in a cement box,
Sclf. "Wc need to think about 'p ractices of the sclr that NnJm rt",J the
Borofsky and Glauman invited prisoners to talk about thei r lives and
essent ial intertwi ning of seU and other, self and soci ety, that are aware of
abou t what had gone wrong for them . In the video some of the priso ners
the subtl e complexities of th is intertwining.·
, hare poem l they have written o r .how ertwo rks they have made. Co n-
Ce rtainly the sense of being isolat ed from the world and alone with
. -. '. ,
versing with the video makers, t hey describe the cppressiveoess of life
one's creations is a commo n experience for artists in ou r culture. the result
inside a prison, where everything is programmed and people never get to
of modernism's hiscoric failure to conn ect with the archetypal O ther. As
talk spo ntan eously about t hemselves because no o ne is interested. Th e
N ancy Pras er pUll it in her book UnrNl, Pr.eticcs: "The monologic view is
knowledge that one is being heard , according to Glassma n, creates a sense of empowerment.
the Roma ntic individu alist view in whic h . ..• solitary voice [is] cry ing o ut into the night againn an utterly undifferent iated background. .• . Th ere il
In Suu nne Lacy', The Cr;yu 41Q Ni/t, performed in Minnea polis o n
no roo m for a reply that could qua lify as 11 differe nt voice. T here il no
Mot her', Day in 1987, a procession of 430 older wom en, all d ressed in
roo m for interaction ." "T he artist con siders his isolati on, his subjectivity,
black, sat down together at table. in group s of four, to di. cuss with each
his individualism almos t holy," nates film direct o r Ingmar Bergman.
other the ir accomplishments and disappointments, their hope' and fears
"Thus we finally gather together in one large pen, where we stand and
abo ut aging, in a ceremonially o rchestrated artwork. A prerec o rded sound
bleat about our loneliness withou t listening to each other Ind without
track of thc voices of seventy-twc wo men at t he tables projected th eir
realizing that we are . mothering each o ther to death ." "An canno t be a
reflections loud e~ough to be heard by the audie nce. "We're no lcngee
mono logue," the French writer Albert Camus o nce wrot e. ·Contra ry to
sitting home in the rocking chair and knitting, like you t hink of grandm as
the current presumption, if there is anY'J!I,anwh o has no right to solitude,
in the old day•. We grandmas aren 't do ing that anymo re," comm ents o ne
it is t he artist."
of the wo men o n the audi otape. · 1 think "a lot of senility comes from the
..
.. fact that nob ody asks you anyt hing, ~ Slates another. "No body asks you ro speak. Prett y soon, you lose your memo ry. I suf fer a lot from peopl e nor
can o nly come into its ow n th rough d ialogue, as o pen co nversatio n, in whic h one listen s to and includ es o ther voices. For many artists now, this
tisrclling to me. ~
means leu ing previously exclude d groups speak di rectl y o f t heir own
Empath ic listeni ng makes r oo m for t he O ther and d ecentr alizes the ego -self. Givi ng each person a voice is w hat builds community and makes U I
soci.lllly respo nsive. l neereeuc n beco mes the medium of expressio n, an
exper ience. Th e audience beco mes an active co mpone nt of the work and is pUt o f t he proc ess. Th is listening o rientation challenges the d o minant ocula rce ntric tr:ad ition, wh ich suggests th at art is an experience available
empathic way of seeing t hrough ano ther's eyes. "Like it subjective am hro-
p rimarily
pologist," w rites Lacy, "[the artist enters] the te rrito ry of the o ther, and ...
Michael Levin states in Modernity i". d the Hegemony of Vision, "T his may
beco mes it co nd uit Ior [their] Cl[ perien cc. T he work becomes
it
metaphor
10
she eye, and rep resents a real shi ft in pandigms. As David
be the time , the app ropriate historical mo ment, to encou rage :and prom ote
for rcl:u ionship-whteh has a healing power." When there is no quick fix
a sh ift in pandigms, a cult ural dri ft that, to some extent , seems alread y to
for so me of o ur mo st press ing social problems, acco rding to L;r,CY. the re
be t:aking place. I am referring, o f cou rse, to the drift from seeing to listen-
may
be onl y our ability to witness and feci the reality taking place around
us. · T h is fetlingneu is a service th at ar tists offe r to the world," she says. After Mierle laderman Uk cles became the un salaried, self-appointed
ing, and to t he historical potential for:a paradigm shift di spla cing vision and installing the very-diffe rent influence of listening.· New models pur forw ard by quantum phy sics, eco logy, and systems
art ist-in-residence at t he New Yo rk C it y Sanitation Department in 1978,
Iheory t hat de fine the wo rld in te rms o f interacting p rocesses and rela tional
she went o n rounds wi th sanitation wo rkers and fore men fro m fifty -nine
fields call for integntive modes o f think ing tha i fCK:uSo n the relati o nal
municipal d istn cts, talk ing wid, them and gwing to know them. He r fim
natu re of reality rather than on discrete o bjects. Lacy Slates, " FCK:using on
piece of art wu a performance wor k called TOI4Ch Sanitarian, whi ch went
aspects of in teraction and relalionship rather than on an obj ects calls for a
on fo r eleven months. D uring that time -,s.he visited the five boroughs of
rad ical rearr an gement in ou r expectations o f what:an artist docs. ~ It calls
Ne w York and shook hands wit h 8,500 workers. " It was an eight -hou r-d ay
fo r a d ifferent app roac h to maki ng art and requ ires a di fferent SCi of sk ills.
performance wo rk, " she sta tes. "I'd come in at ro ll call, then walk their
To tra nscend the moder nist, vision-ce ntered pa r:adigmand iu spectarc eial
rou tes with them.... 1 did a ritual in wh ich I Iaced each person :and shook
~p i Slemology, we need a rcf raming process that makes sense of this more
their h:and; :and I said, 'Thank you for keeping N ew York C ity alive.' Th e
inte ractive, irne rsubjecrive p ract ice which is emer ging. We cannot judg e
real artw ork is the ha ndshake itstlf. Whe n I shake h2. nd s with a sani tatio n
the new art by the o ld na nda rds. " Informed by an interact ive :and recep tive
man ... I p resent this ides :and perfo rmance to t hem, and the n, in how t hey
no rmativity, list ening generates a very d ifferent epiJterne and o nto lo gy-:a
respond, they finish the art .· TOl4chSanitation was U keles's first attempt
very d ifferent meta physics ,· writes Levin.
to co mm unicate as an artist with the workers, to ove rco me barrie rs and
Mod ern ism 's co nfro ntat iona l or ientation resulted fro m deep habits
op en t he way to u nde rstand ing- to bri ng awa reness :and cuing into her
o f t hinking th at set in o ppositio n sCK:iety and the ind ivid ual as two con-
actio ns by listening. Art tha t is eoered in a "listeni ng" self, t hat cultivates th e intertwin-
trar y and antago nistic catego ries, neither o f which cou ld expa nd or develop except at the expense of the o ther. T he free :and self-sufficient indi -
ing of self and O ther, suggests a flow-th rou gh experience w hich is not
vid ual has lo ng been t he ideal o f our cultu re. and utislS especially have
del imited by the self b ut extends into th e co mmu nity t hro ugh mod es of
seen themselves as qui ntessent ial free agents, pu rsuing their own ends.
reciprocal empath y. Because this art is listen er-c ent ered rath er than visio n-
BUI if mod ern ism , and t he art that emerged with it, developed arou nd th e
o riented, it canno t be fully realized th ro ugh the mod e o f self-exp ression: it
noti on o f:a un iq ue and separ ate self, the art generated by what I have called
"
"
CO NN 'C \, '''" ..
"connective aesthetics" is very differ ent , As I have argued in The Reen-
,H'Il"U, ........ u
'NO ''' ,OUAlll"
included in this book contradicts, absolutely, these comments. H owever,
chlHl lmt nt of Art, radical relatedn ess has dramatic implications for our
there is no denying that the art world subtly disapproves of artis ts who
undemand ing of art and con tri butes to a new consciousness of how the
choos e interaction as their medium, rathe r th:an the dise mbodied eye. JUII
self is 10 be defined and experienced. For one thing, the boundary between self and O ther is fluid rather than fixed: the O the r is included within the boundary of selfhood . We arc talking abo ut a more imersubjeerive version
as creativity in the Western wo rld has been based on an unders tanding of the self ., autonomous and separate, the hegemony of the eye is very strong in our culture. We are obsessed with the gaze. At Ihis po int, 10
of the self that is attu ned to the interrel:lli~nal, ecological, and interactive
challenge the vision -cente red paradigm by.undermining th e presumed
characler of reality. " Myself now includes th e rainfor est, writes Austra-
spectatorial dist ance of the aud ience, or by empowe ring olhers and making
lian deep ecologist John Seed. " II includes clean air and water,"
them aware of their ow n creativity, is 10 risk the comp laint that one is
M
The mode of distanced, obj ective knowi ng, removed from moral or
prod ucing not art but social work. Person ally, I have never heard of a
social responsibility, has been the animat ing motif of borh science and art
social wor ker who was inte rested in shaking hands with 8,500 sanitation
in the modern world. O bjectivity stri ps away emotion, wants only the
wor kers, or who tri ed to orchestrate a pub lic convers ation among four
facts, and is det ached from feeling. Objectivity serves as a distancing de-
hundred older women abou t aging. Social workers proceed qu ite differently from artists in what they do.
vice, presuming a wo rld that sunds before us to be seen, surveyed, and manipulated. H ow, then, u n we shift ou r usual way of thinking about art so that it becomes more compassionatd H ow do we achieve the • ...orld view of atlac hment M - attachment to and conlinuit y wilh the world- that archetypJ I psychologist James Hillman talks abOUI ?To see ou r interd ependence and interconnectedn ess is the feminine perspective tha t has been missing not only in ou r scientific thinki ng and policy making but in our aesthetic philosophy as well. Care and comp assion do not belong to the false "objectivism" of the disinterested gaze; care and compassion are the
To all these objectio ns, I can only say that co mparing mode ls of the self based on isolation and on con nected ness has given me a different sense of an than I had before and has changed my ideas about what is important. My con clusion is that our culture's romance with ind ividualism is no longer adequate. My own wor k and thinking have led me to a fieldlike conception of the self th at includes mo re of the environment-a seJfhood that releases us into a sense of ou r radical relatedness. It seems that in many spheres we have finally come up against the limits of a world view
tools of the soul, but they arc oft en ridiculed by our society, wh ich hu
based only on individualism. In the field of psychotherapy, to give just one
been weak in the empathic mode. Gary Zukav pUISil well in The Sellt of
example, James H illm:an, in his boo k Wt 've Hlld 4 H MnJ m J Ye,m of Psychothtrapy-And the World ', Getting WOFJt, cUligates therapy for
the So"f, when he states that th ere is cu.rrendy no place for spiritualit y, or the concerns of the heart, within science: politics, business, or audemiJ. Zukav doesn't mention art, but until recently there has been no particular receptivity there either. N ot long ago, I had occasion 10 share a lecture pod ium with the critic Hilton Kramer, who proclaimed, with the force of a typ hoon, that an is at its best when il serves only iuelf and not som e other purpose. Things Ihat in his opinion have no relation to an are now being accepted and legitimized as art when, aeecrdi eg to Kramer, art is incapable of solving any problems but aesthetic ones. I would argue lh:al much of the wo rk
encoun ging us to disengage fro m the world. He maintains that therapy increases our preoccup ation with individual fulfillment and personal growt h at the expens e of any concern for community or the communal good . Many hackles have been raised in the the rapeutic community by H illman's assertion that therapy has become a self-impr ovement philosophy wh ich tu rns us inward, away from the wor ld and its problems. Psychot herapy is only work ing on the "i nside· sou l, according to H illman, while outside, the build ing., the schoo ls, the streets, are sick-the sickness is out there. The pat ient in need of healinc is the "'orld.
Co nnective aesthetics strikes at the root of this alienation by dis-
active and ecological models emerging in our ec ue re. 1 believe we will see
solving t he mechanical division betw een self and wo rld that has pre vailed
over the nat few decades more art that is essentially social and purposeful,
du ring t he mod ern epoch . Worl d healing begins with t he individual who
and that rejects the mod ernin myths of autonomy and neut rality. 'This
welcomes the Other. In Ukele s'. work, for instance, empathy and healing
book bears witness to the increasing nu mber of art in s who are rejecting
arc the pu " meters, th e test of whether the work is, in fact, bein g carr ied
the product orie ntatio n of consumer culture and finding ever mo re com -
OUt paradigmati cally. Th e ope n hand, extended to each worker, evokes
pelling ways of weaving environ mental and social responsibilit y di rectly
q ualities of generosity and care. We need to cultivate the compassiona te,
into their wo rk. In this complex and 'lVon hy endeavor, 1sincerely wish
relonional self as thoroughly as we have cultivated, in lon g years of abstract
them well.
thi nking, the mind geared to scientific and aen hetic neutrality. As more people acknowledge the need for ~ new philosophical framewo rk, we are learning to go beyo nd o ur culture of separation- the gender, class, and racial hierarchies of an elite Western traditi o n that has evolved through a process of exclusio n and negation. With its focus on radical individualis m and its mandate ofke eping art
Il IHI Q G ItAP H Y' ,,,,,,, 1'1 ...,. Uor. .!y " ..,,, ,,, ' - " DiJ.... '" • • J e.oJ,,1ot c..." ..,.••., S«MI V.i." ,;" 01 Mi... ...." " .." I ' ' '. (J .b li~ ,S .u.
If.. MoJ....I,. r.iJ.JI 1'1. ... Y.. ,~
.".,
n.t.,. 1oI;""..""i"
L.........' 11I. .." ••d IIlHl...... 1'1 ;'
separate fro m life, modern aesthetics circumscribed the role of the audience to that of a detached spectator-observe r. Such an can never bu ild co mmunity. For this we need interactive and dialogical practices that draw others into the process and challenge the notio n, in t he words of G ary Snyder, that ~only some people are 'talented' and they beco me ani su and live in San
Francisco working in opera and ballet and the rest of us should be satisfied with watching television.- Co nnective aenhet ics sees that human natu re is deeply embedded in the world. It makes an into a model fo r connectedn ess
._-
Hilt"'.... j,"' "., M;,k,,1v..... " . \I'. ... II.J . 1f..J..J r .." .( f" 1'ltotlto..r r- .... J ••• 1'1. .. Y 1cH •.,.o<:oIli." 1"1.
_If.
........ D•• :.I 101;'110<1. no L"' ...... . $./f; f'...Mol C....... S«MI O'..,....J , ~ . c/o,... Y..... oM LoIwIooo: ..... ,1<01••• " .,. _
... . Il0J0,oiIy _
_ 'J~
e m;.,
0(..,,,.,.1'.... 1'1. ...
,i. 1f"'_1"V;'-. ...k. lt , .... 1.0> " III rI." U..... ""y01Col;(",oi, , .....
I " ).
","",,,_.. lido ,...• . 101..., IiKkwd,I"l.
~ L-,
70 A.,
0d004,. btl
C-"riooI •••
and healing by o pening up being to iu full dimensional ity-noc just th e . " . " e. Social con text beco mes 11 co ntinuum for imera cricn, for a process of relating and weaving toge ther, creating a flow in which th ere is no spectato riel distan ce, no anta gonistic imperative, but tither the reciprocity we find at play in an ecosystem. Within a listener -centered paradigm, th e old specializatio ns of artist and aud ience, creative and uncreative, prc fessional and unprofessio nal--disd!,ctio ns betwee n wh o is and who is not an anist-begin to blur. To follow this path, 1 wou ld argue, is mor e th an just a matte r of
·{"lupi", wirh the Ml!14CAJ,mk fo."", ' of h"prrv;o"l l_ boDIrl. Ih, ...tho. CIxxJI'I to ,limi". r.. fOO!lloltl f rom her tlIriri",.
personal taste; it represents the opening of an experimenta l space in which to institute and practice a new art that is more in tun e wit h th e many inter-
.
"
world and who we are, between who we are and wh at we do. T he artist ' 0 , ,," e N FO' ' N' GOO D AND H'"
" HA<"') E,,,II. C"w ;U M' i m
tends th e private garden of t he so ul and gives evidence of t his process publicly t hrough the art th at, in turn, inspires o thers to tend t heir own gardens . Th e often-liked question as 10 how one mo ves from being art in to activist I llnd interesting, because I d o not make the separatio n in my own mind. For me, the two roles exinll a single entity: t he ar tist jJ t he activist.
To search for t he good and make it matter: this is the real challenge for the
Indeed, within the African tradi tion, t he art ist's work has a fun ction just
an ist. Not simply 10 transform ideas o r revelations into matter. but to
like everything else in the world. As the mask is for festivals, and the
make those revelations actually mauer. This quest is measured as much in
grou nd-d rawing for marking a sacred space, and t he dance for healing and
Ihc Inll hs we attemp t to cnflesh as in t he clay we might aesthe tically de-
dra wing energ ies to o neself, so, too , th e rit uals that" we perfo rm and the
. ALMst, utlS!ic works not only inspire the viewer but give evidence
monuments that we make have a functi on: t he t ransfo rmatio n of self and
of the artist's own st ruggle to achieve higher recogniti on of what it means
co mmunit y, which is the extended self. Art is a necessity, IS the poet Audre
to be truly human. The works eejesn menu to the artist's effort to con-
Lo rde says, not a luxury. Th e assump tion th at art co uld be so met hing
vert a pan;cular vision of tru th into his o r hcr o wn marrow.
separate from the life that sustains us, th:r.t art is indeed a luxury, is I I false
As I meditated on the theme of Ihis book, I found myself thinking about territories, bot h public and privatA hoUI political turf and defini-
a theory as the notion that t he cu rer terrain can undergo tran sfo rmation
tive lines, those tha t exclud e and those that include. I began to reflect o n
in the world, are the t rue sites of change. N otio ns of separa tion and c rher-
the earth and all t he red rawn borders t hat we who are involved in public
ness are ingrained in Western thought, and it is this very way of thinking
art must bring to the map if there are to be positive new directions for the
that has wreaked havoc on the cult ures of t he world .
world's cuhc res. f fo und myself co ntemplating, as any artist might, t he
without affecting the soul. And yet, many believe that the places outs ide,
While no single culture has :r. co pyr ight o n tru th, perh aps embracing
correspo nding territo ry- the terrain of the sou l, that sacred space withi n
an African view of t he intrinsic co nnectedness of all things would help us
the self th at must be acknowledged and tended, t hat dr eam space where
to recall t he mother fro m who m we have'al l co me. And in remembering
Ede n and womb are ritualistiu lly related, where co nception is possible,
her, perhaps we can begin mo re profou nd ly to "re-member" ourselves.
where we can receive in o rder to give again.
T his charge of remembering the mo ther is imp ortant because without it
Th e d ream space of the so ul is the real terrain tha t we should map.
If no t. then nOlhing else thJ t we are fighting fo r o r against has any possi -
ou r cultun l and crou-cultural amnesia is never liftedi ou r common hu manit y is never fully acknowledged. We never k now wh o we are, and
bility of transform atio l): not the milita rism th at we resist, not t he opp res~
having no tru e identity, we end up like a perso n wh o suffers amnesia,
sion we deplore, not the toxic waste d umping o n the land of the poo r, no t
fearing every face tha t is not the exact replication of our o wn. And some -
the racism o r the sexism that we expose . N one of these con cer ns can be
times in our despe ration, we even fear our o wn face. We never develo p a
taken on unless they are examined, acknowl edged, and co nfro nted within
sense of co ntinuity o r who leness among peop le. Th e cultures that remem-
the inner terr itory of t he self, the earth Ihat, in facl, we are.
ber t his co nnectedness are recalling the crucial element that has been part of ou r su rvival since ou r beginning.
Th e sou l is t he seedb ed of ou r actio ns. Every thing that we co nceptu alize, create, o r desHoy hll its beginnings there. Wha t we see cultivated
Th e artins who remember o ur-co mmon humanit y and inn igale
and thriving in the o uter terrain is a ma ~i fest at ion of our inner creative o r
recogn ition of o ur tru e natu re are those like Anna H alprin, who wou ld
..
have people 1ivi"l "ith AIDS and thoN,,110 Ire not a/llicud Wdc d..
destru ctive impu lses. T here is co nnected ness betw een what we see in the
'0
"
u
.
H' . . ~ ~ C ~ . ,, ~ ... .
em h in a da nce in an attempt to break down the barr iers of fear. They are those like Suzanne Lacy, who would produce a-crystal qu ilt of wome n whose cho reographed laying on of hands helped change the patt erns of their lives and make visible the bonding and power among them . They arc those like Mel Chin. who woul d move us into the mystery of metaphor by
~ "<> ,, ~ " D .... .. .
"
.. ~ . . . ..
W"ter W. ' t rYOH. in!, 50 blHt t· • .. . , .-; I w.terw.ter yoH . in', 50 blHt I do"t c.htdt~d for mystlf.nd thtr~'J . slty in yOIl.
u,.
T his for me-call•.answer. and r~l eue-is a metap ho r for art itself
wo rk ing with scientists to develop hybrid plants tha t absorb po isons from the earth into lu ves whic h can be plucked from our children's surround-
and the po tent ial that it holds. Th e ca.U is i~!ted by the experiences we have wi* the wo rld, by the ~u man condi tions and predica ments wit hin
ings. Th ey arc those like the husband and wife team N ewton and H elen
our terrain that arou se our interest or consciousn ess. Next comes the
Mayer Harrison, wh o have collabo rated for over twenty years, and Mierle
response, the artist's creati~n-th.~ attempt 'to name, recognize, and insti-
Lederman Uk eles, artist-in-residence of the N ew York City Sanitation Department, and Sheila Levrant de Brerreville, and Peter Jemison, and many more who recognize the illusion of du ality, the miracle of collabora-
gate change thro ugh his or her creative expression. But the artist's creation is not the.end of the process, as it.is often thought to be. The process continues as members of the community experience the release, th e inspiration that allows them to enflesh the message and begin activating change in their own terrains.
tion, and the beauty of making truth matter. N one of this is to suggcst that the aesthetic qualit y of any wo rk need ever be sacrificed. 1 say this know ing that it is a critical issue of public art projects involving community participants wh o are not necesurily artists. Someho w, it is Ieared, the parti cipa.n ts' aesth etics will bri ng down the quality of the wor k. But since the a.eSl~etic is determi ned by the artist, perhaps this is not th e ultimate fur of thoic 'who are leery of the new, more collabo rative public an, Perhaps the greater fu r is that elitism will be destroyed, that the fun ction of art will once again be recognized, that freedom of expression will carry the impulse and stark beauty of our first
Th is basic human -to-hum an int eraction signals the symbiotic relationship among human beings. When we understand this, we can go on to bette r appreciate the breath dynamic between ours elvcs and the trees. We can understand our relationship to oceans and ozones and other zones within the universe. Th e blues form is not about being down and out . Th e blues calls to and transfor ms the hcllerer; and cont inues on to tran sform the community. It makes those singers willing to "work the sound" into new and knowin g
breath, and that our own relevance as human beings will come to be seen
people who go about the business of makin g the truth man er. Bessie Smith
in the meaning of our acts. If this is what is so fearful, then we must continue to make such an and to redefine the ways in which th e making is
could not leave halfway th rou gh a concert, We, as the communal singer,
ilself a celebrated process.
dept h of experience is in direct propcreicn to the dedication of our artists.
In deciphering the mystery of th is process, th e blues for m. or formula, from African American cultu re can provide insight. As ethnc-musieolcgists tell us, the blues has thr ee lines: the first line is the call, the second is the response, and the third is the release. The second line might be the ume as the first but with some slight variatio n, and the last is a departu re. The last line rhy mes wit h the first and, essentially, sets you free. Th e whole notion is tr anscendence, as exemplified in thi s stanza I compos ed for illullration:
"
cannot afford to do it either, Th e poet Maya Angelou reminds us that our Indeed, we art ists have to sing the second line in such a way as to signal the possibility for variation in the song. We have to create relevant art , art that invites iu audience into the creative process and empowers them. We must sing in suc~ a way as to promise our lis,teners who would becom e singeu that the third line is a breakthrou gh, proclaiming without a do ubt that "I done checked for myself and there's a sky in you." It seems to me that in order for this transformation to happen, we artiSlS must prepare ourselves to respond creatively and appropriately to
"
...
'
.0
the calls in ou r enviro nment. Th is is no small cho re, especially for those of
uu e"
' 0 _ , .. . 100011 " Nil .... . . .. " ... ...
Th ough the encoun ter with dr eam time is enlivening, it can also be frightening. Th e problem is not our descent into the sou l; it is ou r erner-
us in the public realm, who find ourselves taking on challenging, often emot ionally draining issues; wr iting and rew riting proposals to obtain funding for projects; meeting for what seems like an entire lifetime with
gence, or coming forth . Once we emerge, we muse begin reconc iling what we have come to know with what we n ill sec in the wor ld. We tell ou r-
artistic collabo rato rs; add ressing communi ty participants and relentlessly
selves there is no time to retr eat; we tell ourselves anythi ng to keep from
rallying their interest in the project; gening no funding at all, or just enoug h to present on ly half of the envisioned project; meeting again with collaborators about the meeting on the meeting; encou ntering those critics who themselyes have not decided to be imaginative in their ow n work; and, lut but no t least, never finishing because we are still actively listening to the community's respo nse and remaining sensitive to the sounds and
repeating the ritual of departu re. But if we do succeed in avoiding future descents into the soul, we will more than likely fall into the trap of making art thaI is simply creative rather than tru ly visionary. Th ere is, indeed, a distinction between creative art and visionary art.
I! parallels the difference between the artist who is an ob server; or reporter, and one who is a participant in the creative process-a matter of invest. ment or sou l involvement. Q uite simply, the visionary artist has not
feelings in both the inner and ou ter life. To be an artist amid all these cur rents is demanding. How is the
merely sight but vision , the light the soul makes to illuminat e the pat h for
artin to prepare? Development of one's crah and keen awareness of one's
us all. Th is noti on of the visionary being apart from life, going into his or
surrou ndings are important but are hard ly enough. To be able to make
her dream space, is not synony mous with the Western not ion of the
tru ly visionary art, we art ists must have in our lives the crucial element
mystlc's separation. The vision ary an ist in the communi ty wor ks in the
called dream time, th at is, time when we leave this world and go into our
fields of the person al self, dreams time and engagement with others.
own sacred space, seeking the grace needed to create ou r work . Dream time holds the turm oil and tr auma of the wo rld at bay and allows the
All art ists are able to display their craft without the exert ion and engagement that marks a perform ance from the soul. An artist can simply
vision to be Runted and the huling notes to an une us.
project his or her persona while remaining detached from the performa nce
Some sound levels in the world 's chaos can be deafening. Our wor k in the ou ter terrain C;l.ll beco me so demanding that we think we cannot stop 10 medit ate. But this delib erate pausing is also part of our work, and, in reality, it may be the on ly thin g that distinguishes us from those com-
and the audience. But if you arc · working the sou nds·--if you are invclved in somethin g that engages you; confronting your own prejud ices, fears. and limitations, rather than merely presenting whal you ~ lread y know ; feeling yo ur own discomfort and taking that discomfort into the
munity members who simp ly cannot make the time to take this inner space. Yct they are depending as much on us to hear the calls and to sound
tcrrain where the trU th exposes you-then you are quite possibly in the territory of thc vision. You are close to grasping the mystery of the heal-
the fiut respon ses as we are depending on them to form a chorus for the
ing. You are then, only rhen, within reach of the gift that you can bring back 10 Ihe world.
snnr; in ord er tn release the healing and magnify the mnh. And as odd as it may sound, this is the native territo ry of th e public artin. It is a space (0 which tile community, time and time again, banishes us for its own salvn-
pant. And the du ality between you and your aud ience, you and you r
tion, a space that we ou rselves eventually choose as a healing haven and
work, becomes an illusion . And you have written a poem. You have do ne
hallowi ng cave. The snul, a difficult but necessary terrai n of retreat. hnlds the hlucp rint . or nne might say the "blues -p-in t," of the world we inhabit.
a performance. You have eofleshed the beauty. You have made it mailer.
Once you have glimpsed this vision, then you arc indeed a part ici-
And the communi ty, taking par t in the an, co mpll'les the last line of the blues refrain, initiating a new reality.
"
~
..~;:--:--~-------------------------~T'---------------""' ,, . . . oCoC.~'H" '~""H " _H n,_, .., _::;:..".O."_c..C.c.oCoC.O.~.O.-----"":'11
LOOK IN G AIl,O UNO: ) I WH ue w e A ll,f . W H U f we C O U L D ae . HCy
R L' .
Ipp d '
"
we have lost ou r own places in the wo rld, we have lost respect for the eart h, and treat it badly. Lacking a sense of microcosmic community, we fail to pro tect our macrc ccsmie global hom e. Can an interactive, processhued art bring people ~ c1oser to hom e- in a society characterized by what Georg Lukacs called "transcendental ho melessneu - ? Not since the regional art or thc thirties have so m ~n y people looked
LOO KI NG A Il,O UN D
arou nd, recorded what they see or would like to sec in their own environ-
l've spenr a lot of my life look ing, but less of it look ing around. Ar t history
ments, and called it art. Some have gone beyo nd the reflective function of
and the ~ rt ....orld " m ~ k e prog ress, ~ fows ing on ~n invented vanishing
conventional art form s and the reaedve function of much activist art .
point, losing sight of the cyclic, panoramic vie....s. And of course it's not
Those who have been at it for a lon g time are represented individu ally in
easy to be visionary in the smog. Mean.... hile, H aael Hend erson's "t hink
this boo k. But they also have heirs and colleagues among yo unger artists, writers, and activists who regard the relationship between people and
globally, act locally " has become a truism- an overused idea importan t enough to remain true. T he notion of the local, the locale, the location , the
people unlike them, between people and place, between peop le, place,
locality, the pf.. ce in art, ho....ever, has not caught on in the mainst ream
flora, fauna, and now, necessarily, even atmo sphe re, as a way of under-
because in order to attr act sufficient buyers in the current system of distri -
standing histor y and the futu re.
bution, art must be relatively generalized, detachable from politics and pain. The social amnesia and antihiSlOrical att itudes tha t characteri:r.e ou r society at large aUKt the art ....orld as ....ell. ~ C h a n ge increasingly appears to be all tha t there is.... Th ere is no sense of progress ....hich can provide
The growing reulticuhural" (and cross-cultural, inlercultural) contributions of the lut decade have ope ned up fresh ways of understand ing the incredibly eom plex politics o r nature. Cch ure and the concept of
meaning or depth and a sense of inherit ancc."' But, perhaps because we are at a retrospective moment in hin or y- nearing the end of a millennium and jun past the five hund redth anniversary of the most heralded po int of colonialism- many of us are loo king back to find solid ground from ....hieh to leap forward, into the shifting futu re. It seems significant that what the historian Lawrence G rossberg calls the - ver'y cornerstones of historica l
W
place arc in fact inseparab le, yet peo ple (and ideologies) are often left out of art about land and landscape. As Ken neth H elphsnd hu observed, landscapes (wh ich I would define as place at a distance) "carry legacies and lusons· and can create ~a n informed landscape citi:r.enry.-· N ational, global, collective narratives are especially accessible through o ne's family history- by asking simp le questio ns abou t wh y we moved from one block or city or State or count ry to another, g ~ in ed or lost
researc h~ can also be called the very cornersto nes of the art to which this
job s, married or didn't marry whom we did, kept track of or lost track of
book is devoted: ~ a pp rec i alio n of difference, underst anding of comexe.
certain relatives. A start ing poin t, for example: simple research about the
and ability to make critical comp arat ive judgments on the basis of empathy and evidence."! Ecological crisis is ob viously responsible for the current preoccupation ....ith place and context, u is an ongoing noslllgia for lost connectio ns. The G reek recr of the word "ecology" means home, and it's a hard place
place where you live or were raised. Who lived there before? What changes have been made? have you made? Whcn was the house built? What do the deeds in the county records have to say about it and the land it stands on?
to find these days. Precisely because so many people are not at home in the world, the planet is being rendered an impo ssible hom e for many. Because
'"
How docs it fit into the history of the area? H as its monetary value appreciated or depreciated? Why 1 When did you r family move there? From where? Why ? What Nati ve peoples first inhabited it ? Docs your family have a history in the area, or in any area? Do relatives live nearby? Wh ~ t is
'"
. 0 0
1\ H O U " D ,
HI
~
1 CO U'D I f
, diUerem now from when you were yo ung? Wh y? H ow does the interio r
places arc the reservoirs of human cc mem.'? While place and home are
of you r house relate to the exterio r? How docs iu style and decoration
not synonym ous. a place must have something of the home in it. In these
reflect your family's cultu ral b ae ~ grou n d, the places from which your people camc? Is there a garage:? a lawn? a garden? Is the flora local or
chilling times, the concept of place hu a warm feeling to it. Th e implica-
impo rtcd? Is there water to susuin it? Do any animals live there? And on a broader scope, arc you satisficd with the present ? If not, arc you nonalgit for the past or longing for the futu re ? And so forth . Question s like these can set orf a chain of perso nal and cultu ral reminiscences and ramif1 t ations, ind uding lines of thought about interlink ing histories, the unacknowledged Ameriun dass syst em, racial, gender, and cultural division s and co mmon grounds, land usc/abuse, geography, environment, {Own plannin g, and the experience of nature that hu made a "return ~ to it so myth ical. When this kind of research into social belonging is incorponued into int'eractive or participatory art forms, collective views of place can be arrived at. It prov ides ways to understand how hum an occupants are also part of the environment rathcr than merely invaders (but that too ). Accord ing to Wendell Berry, the most consistentl y inspiring writer on Ameriun place, "I be concept of country, homeland. dwelling place becomes simplif1cd as ' the environment'-that is, what surrounds us. Once we sec our place, our part of the world, as flll'l'Oll" di" 8 us, we have already made a profound divisio n between it and ecrsebes." Rcal immersion is dependen t on a familiarity with place and its
tion is that if we know our place we know something abo ut it; only if we ~ k now ~ it in the historical and expcriential sense do we truly belong rhere. But few of us in contemporary North American society know ou r place. (Wilen 1 asked twenty university studen ts to name "their place." most had none; the exceptions were two Nav ajo women, raised traditionally, and a man whose family had been on a sout hern Illinois farm for generations.) And if we can locate ou rselves, we have ne t necesurily examined ou r place in, or our actual relationsh ip to, that place. Some of us hllvc adopted places that arc not really ou rs eKCept psychologically. We have redefined place as a felt but invisible domain . In contra st to the holisti c. earth-centered indigenou s peop les of this hemisph ere (who, over thouu nds of years. had also made changes in the land), the invading Europeans saw the natura l wor ld as an object of plunder to be conquered, eaplcited, and commodified. They import ed denial, still a prevalent disease amnng the ir descendants. The causes of the exhausted resources. Ihe scarcity of wood and arable land in an "old world~ were never ack nowledged; old habits werc simply reasserted in the "new world. ~ Although a sense of collective loss spread through this COUniry at the end of th e nineteenth century, when most of the arable land had Men
hinory that is rare toda y. O ne way to unde rstand where we havc landed is
parceled OUI, most people in the Un ited SUtcs tod ay still want to believe
to idcntify the econom K: and historic al forces that brought us wh ere we
that ou r resources- water. topsoil, Ic rests, fuels, oxygen-arc inf1n ite. Not
are- alone or accompanied. (Culture, said one cont emporary arti n , is nOt where wc comc fro m; it's where we' re coming from.) As we loo k at our-
unrelated is the scant attent ion paid to Ihe ways ru ral and urban spaces arc struc lured and how they affect our national psychology. (H isto rian John
selves critically, in social contexts, as inhabitants, users, onloo kers. tOurists,
Stilgoe says tha t in colonial New England. towns planned in odd shapes
we can scrutini7-e our own part icipatory roles in th e natural processes that arc (nl'ming nur futures. Similarly, the study of place oUers access m expe-
were seen as disorde rly and were "more likely to har bor civil and ccclcsiastical u n rest." ~
rience of the land itself (and what we call "nature" ] as well as to current ecological politics and a sense of responsibility to the future.
Today, according to Rosalyn Deutsch, space as a reflection of power relation s (produced by social relations) "is on the political agenda as it
Jeff Kelley has distingu ished the notion of place from that of site, made po pular in the late sixties by the term "eite-specjfic" sculpture: ~ A
landfills. shopping malls, parks, and other social context! for many years
site representS the constit uent physical properties of a place . . . while
now. Yet the overall tone is not exuberant. I' ve been stru ck by three recent
never hn been before. 0' This is tru e for art ists who have been "Iraming"
1 ,,~)' 1/
1"1'1'" ,,1
' OO ~'N "
uO ...." O
W .. . . ,
w, ' '' , W .. . . ,
W , ~ " ...." . . .
nnming phenomena: First, the posrmod emise impulse (now at least a de-
by modeling themselves o n Indians even while wiping them out.' The
cade old. and supremely rerroacrivc in its own right) has spawned a plct hnra of exhibition s. art icles, and books called re-viewing, re-visio ning,
(a proce ss that began in the sixties) is partl y due 10 India ns' grass-roots
re-mapping, re-Ihinking. re-pholOgraphing. Second, the thles of exhibi-
strength and pr ide at ha.ving survived, partly bolstered by their ugc at the
lions about land and natur e are becoming mdaneholie and even apocalyp-
COSt in Native culture, health, and la.nd. But it is a.lso a prod uct of the
tic: for instance, AgAinst Nat.. re. The Demoraliud undscdpe, The
growing recognitio n among Eurc -Americans that the five-hundred-year-
U nmd1l: mg of Ndfll re. L OSf J/{UJlons, and Usopi«; POlf - U fopiA. Third, the terms - terrilo ry.- "laud,- -ca rt h,· "terrain,- and -mapping- are also
old d ream went awry. Th e search fo r place is the mYl hiu l search fo r rhe
ubiquitous in both theory and practice. Th c map as a micro/macro visual
art iSI Peter Jemison has uid il is not the f1a.g but the pole and cagle on 101'
resurg('nce of mainstr eam interest in Nati ve culture in the Ian few yean
nis mund i, for so me place to stand, for so m('thing 10 hang o n 10 . (St n('ca
co ncept has Io n); been of interest to artists. and particularly 10 "co ncep-
thu mean so m('lhin g to his people; th('y co nnect earth and sky, bod y and
tual" and - eart ll- artists fro m 1')65 10 1975. O n o ne hand , map ping the
spiril.) At the same lime, a. de-idealiaaricn of natu re ana of Nativ e an itud es
turf can be seen as abetti ng surveys. f('net'S. boundaries, zo ning. and orhcr
reward natu re is necessary because anYlhing ser o n a ped estal can SO easily be undermined.
instrumenlSof possession . O n t he o rher hand, maps lcoIls us where we arc and show uS...here ....e're going. Und('rstanding our cuhural geography will be a necessary compc-
A responsible a. rl of place must be pari of a ('entering process. Wave a.ftc r wave of exiles is still co ming thr ough t his land, and we have made
ncnt of t he reinventio n of nature . We need to stop dt'nying difference and
internal exiles even of those who arc iu natives. Th e immigra. nt pop ulation
pr('tending a woo zy universalism Ihat masks and ma.inlains deep social
in the United St.ues (all of us) hu no center, no wa. y of orie nling ilScif. W('
diviswns . W(' !lav(' 10 know mo re about o ur relation ships to each other, u
tend to presume our ancestors had one, but my fa. mily. fo r exampl(', con-
put of the cult ural ecology, to know where w(' stand as artislS and cultu ral
sund y moved around; from the 1700s o n, few genera. tion s stayed in the
workers o n hornd('ssness. racism, I nd land.....l ler. cultu ral, and religiou s rights. wh(,lher o r nOI we ever wo rk dir ectly o n the se issues. Because they
$;lm(' town. Wh('n :t place-oriented sculpto r says, " Plsee is whu you have
art' linked, to be ignoranl of o ne is to misun dersu nd anoth er. Yet such awareness demands extensive visual and verbal (and local) research th at is
lefr,-' I' m not sure whether she means · a.1I tha t remains" or - Ihat which is I('h behind." Although an hu oh('n been used in the pasl as propaganda fo r
not includ ed in tradil ional an edu cation . Multicu llUra.1st udies espC'C ially
colonialism and expansionism (('specially d uring the nine ttenth-cenlUry
need to be inco rporated into :trl abo ut history ;md place. If only wh ite
moveme nt west], and much contemporary public art is srill prop aganda for
histo ry is studied, rhe place remains hidden. For instance, when I taugln a.
('xisting po wer stru ctures {cspeeiaily develo pme nt and ban king), no better
s('minar o n land in Colo rado. I fou nd I had 10 include the way land was
med ium exists in this society to reimagine nature, to negotiate. in Do nna
used and conceptualized by the origina.l inhabitants, the t ragic histo ries of
Ha. uway's wo rds, "the term s o n wh ich lo ve of nature cou ld be pari of t he
Native lands and lives and of the co ntinuing suuggle on Mexican land
solution rather than part of the imposition of colo nial domi nation :tnd environmental dest ructio n." !"
gr ~ O! s.
the roil'Sof black farmers and cow boys, Ch inese n iJroad and
agricultu ral work ers, :tnd Ih(' desert internme nt of Japanese Americans during World War 11. White America. has been deeply affected (so deeply it doesn't often show o n the surlace}by t he [and-based traditions of Na tive and mestizo cultures; colonists inhcritcd agricultural sites and techniqu es and survived
'"
T he upper middle class (fro m which the majority of arliSts emerges) tends 10 confuse place with natur e, because it bas the means and leisure time 10 ind ulge its wanderlust, to tr avel to sites of beauty, difference, curiosity, to have second homes o n sho res, in mc un tnina, o n abandoned farms.
I...ey R. 1.,pp",J
' O OUN G AO O U N O
..... oo,
.... u, ..... , ,, .... c o,,' o ..
But u rban envi ron mentS are also places, ahhough fo rm ed differcruly, mo re
A ny ntw k ind ofart prltCfict if going to havt to lakr pltttt at It alf pltrlilt/ly
likely to spawn the multiple selves th aI case cross-cult ural co mm un ica-
o/lu idt oftht II" V1O rl". A nd hard a f il if to m ..bfiJh ontstlfin ,ht .. r/ woTld
tions, that in h CI are the resu lt of cross-cultural cc mmunicarion , Tho se of
I~JJ o"rClmHcribtJ Itrritorit f ..re All Ibt mort frAughl wilh p~ril. OUI there,
us living in any b ig cit y l od ~ y are co nf ro nted by a vast mirror wh enever
mOil art.im art neither w dro me nor rffulivt', bUI in bere if " PO I ~1lfi"lI)'
we step ou tdoors. II rdl ccu us and rhose who. like us, live on this co m'
uoffoe.." n8 cocoo n in w hich .. rtists Are dtludtd lItlo fer ling imporl"»1 for doing only wh .., is UPUItJ ofthem. Wt conlinut / 0 1.. 11: abOHI -nt w f orm J· bre"HlC'
mo n ground; ou r ap pearances and lives often d iffer, but we can 'I look infO the mirro r witho lll seeing them 100 . The recip roc al natu re of cu ltural co mmu nicatio n is th e nail j ames Baldwin hit on t he head when he said. MI( [am nOI who you thought I was, t hen you are not who you though t yo u were eith er.- II T he dialec tic between place and c ha l1~e is a creative crossroads . I' m experi menti ng with the ideas ske tched above as tcaching tool s, as wa ys in which teache rs and stu d ents can co lhbo u te to find th eir places: an increasing number o f M li ~t s arc becoming involve d in .\imih r ideas. l nlu tely ime n liscip linar y and multicultura l, th is line of inq uir y and production relat es to co ntexts and content rat her tha n to style and tre nd s. My models are the arti sts who se co ncep ts o r place and hislo ry includ e peo ple and fo rm th e grass roou of mu ch interacti ve or " new geore" an-from Ju d ith Baca's C rtll' Willi of LOJ Angtft " which b rings togeth er teens fro m d iffer en t
'
Iht nt'W hlH been Ihe fn/ifizi ng fe lifh of th r " vam -garde fin a it drla ,hrd ilulf f rom th r !nf" nll'y. BUI il may be th ltl /Iu te n~w fo rm, ItTt only to br fOHlld bu ried in Jocillf ent rglt s nOI yet ru ogniz rd "J .. rI. t)
N o t allthe var ied [but still no t varicd eno ug h) fo rm s th at have com e: to be called ·pub lic an Mdeser ve Ihe: name . I wou ld define public U I as accessible wo rk o f any kind thaI cares abou t, ehallcuges, invo lves, and co nsuhs. the aud ience fo r o r with whom it is mad e, respectin g co mmu nity and cnvsrc mnem. Th e o dler stu rr is n iH priv ate art, no matter how b ig o r exposed or intrusive o r h yped it may be. In o rd er 10 so rt OUI whe re we srand at th e moment, I've: made a necessarily ten taliv e: list of the existi ng genres o f "ou t look ing " art aUOUI p lace. T hese He not inrend ed as frozen categories, and ma ny obv io usly overlap:
(Uhural backg rounds to create a mu ral o n t he non whit e histor y o f C:tlifor· nia, to Micrlc Ladcrman U keles's wo rk wuh the New Yo rk C ily San it:uiOIl I) CI'.1rt mcn t exposing ho w we: mainra in ou rselves and manag e ou r wasre (,ln cl wilh whom); fro m John Malpcd e's small-scale examinations o f homcle:ssneS$ 10 N ewto n and H elen Mayer H arrison 's large-sc ale enviro nmenta l rescue attemp ts. Anis rs envision (.1 verb tha I embraces a nou n) a process that res uln In an artwork.
I. Wo rk s pr epare(j fo r cou ver uiona l indoor exhibi tion (insu llalio ns, pholog rapll s, co ncept ual art, and p rojecr proposals) Ihal refer 10 local co mmunil ics, h islOry, or enviro nmelltal issues. Examples are Deborah Urigh t and N ancy Go ucha r 's Chicago 5,o ,-ir$, N ewt o n and H elen
M~yer H arr ison 's p roposed Bo uld er C reek Pr oject, and Rich..rd Misne: h 's Bravo 10: Th~ Bom bing of Iht AI1l ~ ri". n Wtl/. 2. Trad itio nal Outdoor public art (no t " p lun k an,Mwhich has simply been
W l·HIl, E WE AIH
enla rged and d ropped o n the SiIC) that d raw s ane:nlion 10 rhe speci fic I've: h"e:n stTuJ,a:lin\; wilh rhcse ques tions fo r a long lime. In 1C)(,7 1 wrote: t hat llisu a l art
wa ,~
hn vcring at a cros sroad s Mthal may weltr urn Out to be
tWO roads 10 one place: art as ide a aocl an as act ion ... . Visual arl is srill visual even wl.en il is invisible o r
'"
v is i"n~ ry. · l/
In 1980 I wro te:
characteris tics o r Functions o f th e p laces wher e il illlcrvcnes, either in p redict ab le lee ..ticns such as p uks. bank plaz u, muse um gardcn s, and co tle: ge campuses (such as Andre:w Leiceste r's mini ng memo rial in r=ro~t bUfg, Mar yla nd; Ath e:na Tacha's Memory Pn{/J in Saraso ta,
. o o ~, ..
"
O" " ~
.. ~
~,
""",
,
~ o"
"
these work s oflen function as ~ wake-up art, ~ a o l:llyst 10 eeneenve actio n, Eltamplcs arc Suzlnne Lacy's Thr te Weeki in Ma, in Los An-
FJorid ~; and Barbara Jo Revelle's Pt ople 's H iuory of Colo rado, in
Denver), or in unexpected and sometimes inaccessible loc.:l.(ion s, such as Streets, store windows, a cabin in the woods, a laundromat , a golf eco rse. an office. a supu market, a crater in the desert, a residential neighbo rhood (such u Charles Simo nds's imaginny landscapes and civ;liu tions for " Linle People" and David Hammons's H OIHt of fin
"
geles, and Guillermo G6 mtz.-Peiia and Coco Fusco's The Year of lhe Whi,e Star al several sites in the U nited Stales and EtlrOPC, 6. Art that function s for environmenta l awareness, improvemen l. or
F" t"rt in Chnleston, South Caro l;na). Th is group would also include
reclamation by transfor ming wastelands, focusing on nalural histor y,
innOvative and officially funded public art and memor;als wit h social agendas and local rde rences, such n Maya Lin's Vielnam Veterans
operating utjlitarian sites, making parks, and cleaning up po llution. An eu mple is Alan Sonfin's Time L.."dJCape of Nr"W York Cif"
Memorial and Barbara Kruger's Linle Tokyo mural at th e Museum of Co nte mporary Art, Los Anj:;e1es.
7. Direct. didactic political art t h ~ t com ments publ icly on local or natio nal issues, especially in the for m of signage on tn nsportation, in parks. on buildings, or by the road, which mu ks sites, events. and invisible histo ries. EKalllples are REPO history's sign pro ject in Lower
3. Site-specific ou tdoor artworks, oh en collabo rative or collective, that significantly involve th e community in execution, background information, or ongoing fun ction. Examples are officially condo ned
M ~n ha tt an , David Avalos, Louis H ock, and Elizabeth Sisco's San
graffili walls; Joel Sisson's G reen Chair I'roje" in Minneapolis; O livia
Diego bus project, and Hachivi Edgar Heap of Birds's HO$l pro jects al muhiple sites.
Gude and Jon Pounds's Pullma n Projects; n Chicago; th e Border Arl Workshop in San Diego and Tijuana; Dr. Charles Smith's African American Heritage Museum in Aurora , Illinois; and works by nun y progressive muralists.
8. Portable pu blic-access radio, television , or print media. such as audioand videotapes, post cards, comics, guides. manuals. artists' boo ks, and posters. Examples arc Carole Co nde and Karl Bcveridgc's book and posler work whh Ca nadian un ions and Paper TIger pub lic-access
4. Permanent indoo r public ins t ~ lIalions, often wa h some function in regard 10 the conlmu nity's hisrory, such as po n office murals across
television . demonn ration art suc h as fhe AIDS quilt, and thc Spu l..de of Tramf orma/lon in Washington , D.C,
the country and Houseon Conwill. Estella Co nwill M;ijo:r.o. and Jc srph De Pace's The RIVers al the Schomburg Ce nter for Research in Black Culture in New York C ily. Th is group also includes historyspecific commusury projects Ihat focus on ongo ing educational processes, such as the C hinatown H istory Project in N ew York C ity and the Lowell, Massaehusclls, national industrial park. $.
Pe rl o rm ~ n e e s or rituals out side of trad itional art spaces t h ~t call attention to places amI their histOries and problems, or to a larger comrnu-
niry of ldenlity and experience. Like street posters, stencils, or Slickers,
'J,
Actions and chain actions t h ~t travel, permeate whole to wns, or :Ippear all over rhe eountr y simultaneous ly to highlight or link cuerem issues. Examples arc John Pekner's stencils in the Bronx, N ew York; the Shadow Project, a nation wide commemoration of H iroshima Day; and Lee Nading's highway ideograms." For decades now a few artists have veraurcd 0 111 into the public
context and made inter active, participato ry, effective, and affective art rd ating to places and the peoplein them. Since the late fifties there have
'"
'"
' O O~ I" ~ 40 0 "" 0
"" .. " . wI , " "" .. . . , "" I ' 0" ' 0 II
been atte mpts by artiS!s ut ili7.ing fo rm, materials, particip ation, cont ext,
and energy that shou ld be going into the mutual and collective ed ucation
and co ntent (e.g., H appenings by Allan Kaprow, Cl aes Oldenburg, and
of artists and bureaucrats and aud iences isn' t av:tilable. O f the peopl e I've written abo ut since 1981 in my colu mns on art,
Ca-olee Schn eeman) to escape from galleries and mu seums . In t he sixties Ihe gerund (t he grammatie.al form of process) o vercame sculptu re, .....hich
politics, and co mmunity,II most arc still o n t rack. Co llabora tion and o rga-
began su tte ring, leaning, hanging, fo lding, stretching, acting out, and
njU l ional suppo rt seem to sustain outreach energies, while "success" and
ot her .....ise mut;uing and mobilizing. Since around 1966 there has been a
the auraction of co nventio nal venues lend to weaken grass-roots invo lve-
body of .....o rk that questio ns all of the struct ures by which an exislS in Ihe
ment, even as they offer higher prof1le o ppo rtuni ties to work in public. A
world -c-rhe modernist myths, the com modi ty SUtuS, effects o n t he ecol-
few highly visible progressive art ists have been able to get their messages
ogy, male and whit e dominance, the precious object, the specialized o r
across to truly large, thoug h not necessarily broad, aud iences by expandi ng t heir media access.
uppe r-class audie nce. and Ihe eultu ral con finement of an ists t hemselves.
Th e ar t worl d's novelty express tr ain, which often rewards the
Pnalleling the develo pment of a socially aware experimen tal an since the sixtie s, a fu gile mo vement for cultural democracy has recogni:r.ed
superficially " new" and igno res tho se who are in for the lo ng haul (un less
art as useful, tho ugh not neecssarily ut ilitarian. T hanks in pan to the
their produces arc n leable), is part ially responsi ble fo r the au ritiO'1 amo ng
wa rne" '5 art moveme nt, which si nce t he earl y seventies llas emphasised
pub lic artists, 1S is the polit ical and econo mic climate. Even as it fails to
social struct ures as form al innovs rio n ( more women make and write abo ut
reach its goals, however, hit- and- run (o r hug-and -sldle-off) art offers
p ~ rtici p uory
tan talizing glimp ses of new entran ces fo r an into everyday life.
public art than men), we have seen a broadening of the no-
Mod ern ist art is always moving figuratively into " uew'trerrain,
tio n of pub lic art into a nurturing as well as entertainin g, pleasure-givi"g,
tl"sting " new " parame ters, demandi ng " new" pandigrns. It remains to be
o r critical enterprise. By the late eighties, rather surprisingly, this impe tus was relatively accepted
Into
the mainstr eam, t hough its antecedents are never acknowl-
edged . nUl the n: is, in fact, litt le fully realized " new genre public art " o ut there yel. The relationships between anist and community have \Isually
seen whethe r t he " new" genre publi c art with which this book is Ca ll ccme d can transcend the boundaries [and the co mml" rcial demand for novelty) that shelter o r imprison even th1l art which moves out into tlie wo rld. Altho ugh I've used the wo rd as much as anyo ne, I' ve come 10
been serially monogamous. Th e art ist (who may live in situ o r may have
understand that a truly pu blic art need
parachuted in) goes o n to so met hing else, and th e co mmunity is often
since the social eerucxts and audiences so crucia l to its fo rmatio n arc ,,/_
insufficiently involved ro co nt inue o r extend the pro ject on irs o wn. Too many m ists who had hoped
to
help change the world th rough making
issuc-o riemed art fo r larger audien ces in more accessible places have be-
w.,s
changing. As I go
OV ('f
1'1 0 1
be '" new " to be significant,
the ecological art that has been made in the
laSt t wcnty years (especia lly the ephemeral landseape art of the late sixties and early seventies, and the spiritually orie nted feminist art of t he seven-
co me disillusio ned wilh the accomp anying bureaucracy. " Public art sucks "
tics), 1 am simultaneously hea rtened by ils variety and disappoi nted by its
is the o pinio n of one much -respected and lon g-commiucd public an isl.
communicative limitalio ns. Helen Mayer Har riso n says, " We havl" n't
Another rclls me she is finished wuh public art after worki ng for years o n
spok en the voice of the river; cultivate humility..... T he interactive aspl"cts
a project t hai was fully ok ayed and fund ed until an officially co ncocted
of the o Ulreaching an -abo ul- place that has been developed duri ng the last
glitch appeared and .....iped ;1off t he screen. Idealistic ani,!S all over this
few yurs may be fragile and tenta tive, bUI they are budd ing, composred in
co untr y arc being strung up with red tape, marty rs to rhe hopdul cause of
a renewed sense of memory, ready to blosso m if we can creat e a welcomi ng o ut-of -an conte xt (or them to venture into.
a truly pub lic, interactive, participat ory, and progr essive art . T he money
'<><> ~'NG
W >!E R E WE CO U L D BE
T here is no reason to cut the tics tha t bind such an to its home in the com munity, which at wor st con stricts and regulates it and al ben shares ils concerns, offering rt Jp0>lSt-iblt criticism and support . lnstt ad, the task is to establish an add itional set of bo nds radiating 0 1.1 1 to part ieipam ccmmunities, audiences, and other "mugina lizc:d ~ artists, so that the art idea
w, U H> , ,, . .
. ' <>UN" W" , O, W, . 0' W"'"
mechanisms, into the possibilitiu dll t a life or nt making holds for Ihose temp ted by such risks ? With Iew exceptions, the an schools 'l.1ld departmenu in this country still teach a nineteent h-century notion of the function (or funclionlessness) of art . Th ere arc a few Rart in a social context courses sprinkled arou nd the world," but they remain overwhd med by M
beeon-es. linally, part of the Center-not an elite center sheltered and hid-
conventio nal views. Mon art studen ts, even sophisticated ones, know lin le o r nOlhing about rhe history of attemp ts to break dow n the walls. The
den from pu blic vit w, but an aceessible center to which participants art allr acttd from all sides of art and lift .
Iacr is, we nctd 10 change the syste m under which we live and make art .tS citizens and as art workers . We art laying OUt the ingredients but still
To aUtet perccprio n iudf, we need to apply ideas as well as forms to the ways people see and act withi n and on their surroundings-in muse-
look ing for the recipe. O nce there are morc coo ks, everybody will usc the ingrtdients differently. We cou ld be Rtt'aching Rfuture an -not wllal's
ums, parks, and N ucational institutions. Ideas catch lirt in dialogue, when onc person's cyes light up as anothe r conjures imagt s. Art iudf, as a dema-
already been made, and nor nCi;tssnily in institu tions. Wecould be propagating rhe sources and comexrs of the an thai hasn't been madc yCI. This is
terialiud spark , an act of recognition, can be a eaulyst in all areas of life once it breaks away from the cultu ral conlinemcnt of the muket realm.
where thc absolutely crucial multicultural and interdisciplinary components of an about place come in.
Redefinition of art and artist can help heal a society thal is alienated from ilSlife foren . As Lynn Sowder has said: "We mun shift our d1inking away from bringing grcat an 10th e people to working ""ith people to create art that is mean in~fu 1. " " Feminism and activism ha\'e created models, bu t
Cul ture is what defines place and its me.ming 10 peop le. The apolitical and "cu ltu rd ess ~ cultu re in which moSt of us live in the Unitcd States inevitably leaves us placeless. Tod ay, in tht nineties, some artists have
we've barely touc hed th e depth of complexity with which art could inter-
t!Jat's nOI hierarchal but temporal, ongoing. Some art Iu s become a catalySt
act with society. To change the powe r relations inherent in the way art is now made
ventured to make known a broader sense of culture as a pan of our lives or vehicle for equal exchange among culture s, helping us find our multip lc selves as opposed
10
one-dimcnsional stereotypes. Regard less of class
t ntrgil'T not yet rl'Cogni ud as art. Some of the moSt inleresting an empts arc
and oppo n unity, we all harbor several identilies- religious and political af/'llialions or lack thereof, cultu ral and geograph ical backgro unds , marital
those that reframe not -necessarily-an practices or places by seeing rhem
or parental status, occupation, and so on. To learn to U St these multiple
and distributed, we need to continue to seck ou t new form s bu ritd in social
through the eyes of art. T his, too, is an idea that or iginated in the mid-
idemitie s, not just 10 know ou rselves but to empathi 7-c and work with
sixties. At that time such "lo oking aroued " was the product of a rejection
ot hers, is one of the lessons an interactive art can offer. On e of the work
of art as "precious objects. ~ as more w lff lilling up the world. Thc idca was
gro ups at the "Mapping tile Terrain" conference summarize d: Acn hetics
to look
If the rat's lIest of prob lems that accomp anies any foray out of the
shapes relation ships between people. Co nstant negot ialion s of life arc reenacted and released in art. You can't do communi ty work un less you listen, usc intuition.
StIJdin has deflected marr y artists from new nr old genre pub lic art, tlO artist who has ventu red out returns without being changed, and charged.
Community doesn't mean und erstanding cverything about every. body and re s olvi n~ all the differences; it means knowing how 10 work
l-low cnn we bu ild these changes imo art education, into the career
wit hin differences as they change ,1nd evolve. Critical consciousness is a
M whal was already in the world and transfo rm it imo art by the process nf .~ cc i n g- n a m i n g and pointing ou t- rather than producing.
,"
M
H
'"
IOO "
process o f rewg nizing bOlh limita tion s and po ssibi lities. We need
10
col-
N~
"
OUN O
W" ,ot W I
U ,. ",..,.,
""' ""OU' "
Of
relat ion ship s an d histor ical co ns tructio ns of pla~e . Wle need artists to gu ide
laboratc with small and larg e social, pol it ical, specialized gro ups of peo ple
us rhroug h the sensu ou s, kin esthetic resp on ses to topography, to lead us
already info rme d o n and imme rsed in th e issues. An d we need
into the archaeology and resu rrect ion o f land -ba sed soc ial h islory, to bring
10
teach
them to welcome art ists, to u nd erstand ho w Mt can concretize and en vi-
o ut multiple read ings o f places that mean different things to d ifferent peopl e
sion their hoals. At th e same t ime we need to co llaborate with th ose wh ose
.1ml at d ifferent time s. And th ere is mu ch we can learn from the iron ically
bac kRrou nds and maybe foregrou nds are un familiu to us , rejccting th e
labeled " primiriv e" cult ure s "b out u ndersta nd ing ou rselves as part of
insidiou s noti o ns o f "divc rsiry" thaI simp ly neut ral ize diffe ren ce. Empalhy and excha nge are key wor d s. Even for int eractiv e
anworkers who have
all the r ight ideas, elit ism is a hard habit to kick . N o thing t hat exclude s the places of peo ple o f co lor, wom en, lesbia ns, gays, o r working peo p le can be
nature, interd epend ent with ever ythi ng in it-c-hccau sc natu re includ es ever ything, even techn olo gy, created by humans, wh o arc part o f natu re, Wh:lt wou ld it be like, :ln art produ ced by th e im:lgin:ltion :lnd respo nses o f its view ers or users? H ow can art acriv sre loca l act ivities and
called inclusive, un iversal, or healin g. To find th e wh ole we must know
local vnlucs ? Wit h ade qu ate fund ing reso urces, publi c art ists might set up
and respec t " II th e pans. So we need to weave a relat ion ship and reciprocal theo ry o f multi-
social and po litical spaces in which energies cou ld come to gether. di alogue
plicity about who we n e, wh at is ou r place, and how our cu ltu re affecta
in relat ion to rhc famil iar "f ramin g" st rategy, in wh ich wh at is alre.l d y
o ur enviro nme nt. We need to know " lot mo re ab out how o ur wo rk "HCC IS
there is put in sh arp relief by th e add it io n o f an art of calling atten tion.
and disa ffect s the peo ple exposed to it, wh eth er and hn w it docs and docs
«Parasit ic " art forms, like co r rected bill bo ard s, can ride th e dominan t
co mm unic ate. T his tOO ca n be bu ilt into experim ental educ atio n in
cu lture physically whi le challe nging it politicall y, creat ing o pe nly co n-
1"'1
and alternatives o r oppo sit ion co uld be concretized. Thcse mig ht be seen
bot h an histo ry and stu dio co urses (the two rem ain absurd ly separa led at
test ed terr ains th at expos e th e tru e ide rllities of existing pbces and spaces
mOS I scho o ls).
and th eir function in social co nt ro l. Another set o f possi bilities is art thaI
To return to th e not ion of place, art can no t be a centering (grou nd ing) device un less th e artis t her self is cente red and grou nde d. This is nor to
activ ates t he co nscious ness of a place b y subtle markin(;s without disturb. ing it- a boo klet gu ide, walking to ur s, o r di rectional sign s capt ioning the
say th at th e alien ated, th e di sori ent ed, th e derac inarcd. t he nomadic [i.c.,
hist o ry o f " hou se o r a fam ily, suggesting t he dep th s o f a landscape, th e
mos t o f us) cannot nu ke art. Bill SQme po rtable place mus t rest in ou r
ch aracte r of a co mm u nit y.
souls . Perh ap s we arc luck y enough to hav e so me sust aini ng ch unk of "nature"
10
nou rish us. Per hap s the cit y is just as satisfy ing. Perh aps the
stu dio is the d en wh ere we lick o ur wound s, dr eam u p images, p lan new
Art is o r shou ld be gen ero us. Bu t arti sts can on ly give what th ey receive from th eir sou rces. Believing as J d o tha t co nnectio n to place is a necessary co mpo nen t o f feeling clos e 10 peo ple , to the eart h, I wo nde r wh at
slrategies, gath er the st reng t h to go om again. Perh aps t he limitalion s o f
wi ll make it possible for arti st s to «give" pl aces back to people who can no
the ivory gallery and th e pag es o f art maga?in es arc stu nting th e gro wth of
lon ger see th em. Becau se land plu s people-their pr esence and absence-is
an art that d reams of str id ing fearlessly into th e streets, int o the u nkn o wn,
wh at make s place reso nat e. Ahe-narives will have to emerge o rganically
to mcer an d mingle with others ' lives.
fro m th e artists' lives and expe rie nces. And th ey wo n 't u nless a b roader set
As "onvisionaries;' art ists sho uld. be able to provide a wa y to
o f option s is laid out by th ose wh o arc explo ring rhese " n ew~ ter ritor ies.
wo rk :I~a inSl the do minant cult ure's rap aciou s view of nature (~ M :l n ifcH
The arti st has to be a parti cipa nt in process as well as its d irecto r, has to " live
D estin y"), to reinstat e th e mythical and cuh ura l dim ension s to "pub!ic"
t here" in so me way-physically,sy mbo lically, 0 1 el11 pathet ically.
exper ience and
...
M
th e same t ime to become co nscious of th e ideolo gical
NO TES
Tl" iJ ", ,. ,h" " "1 ..... p,.d,d ,. my ''''' ,",o''' in,
b<>o~
Th, I.• "
.f
WHOSE MONUMENT WH ER E! ' U8 1.1 C ....RT I N A M ....NY . C U lT U MEO
,h. /.<>,,1 .
1. I. . ..." . " G•• "t.<,., ~""I
"i" <>I Mlft,,,,.,, r" " .
1' 00)• • . 11
' Col. .. J, K•• n" h It d ph, IId. ;n I:.,nft" h lMph. nJ ",.I f. ,ft M,...."". " (Bo,Jd ' ,. Cn...." ~l • • h" ,. ' '''1), pp, " ' " ... .
"'·,.d, 1l
J.: V", • • , . / .. A.... .., .. Lo.J"" ,
Using lhe term "public art" in an ~ u d i e n c e of many cuhure s brings diller-
n. V."" Io'1 .{ Aw'" . ' C.. I,. " •• J ,11,,, . 1,. .. (S,. F" "" " o: s;., ,, Cl. h Ilo<>~ , . l'lt ~~ p. ll.
~"' r,
C,.",
j . J.r l 1:. <11" . ~ ., i. 1'1 ... .· 10 II.. JI,.J.,•• , . ,I (S, . I'". , ,,, o: II"dl"" h I... ,h, ..."'. ' ~" ). p. ). . . AI'hnulh I ~" "''''' '01 M ,h" ,u hi", 0,10" I ",.I 1(,11,1" ...o, ~ •• pi",. I h••, I " . , d '"'.T ;o"lh" lo"", ,h" 1" w.pol>ll,h, d . ",100, ,ml'' ''' '''' c1"y . 1Id ' "
John~. S,II.",. C Inl l), p.
~.
ofA """"
, 1) 1(},.
Yo ,~ ,"",
N, ..
sec t he mu rals of Los Tres Grandes or the ritual sand paintings and totems of Nativ e peoples. So meone s~id t h~ l the purpose of a monument is to
I'" (N,... H,.,••nd 1.. ...1"": y,I, U.'''''''' p,,,,.
br ing t he past into t he present to inspire the future. Monuments may be like the adobe fo rmed from the mud of a place Into the buil din g blo cks of
O,.,,,h.-Un",. 0 ,.,101' ''' ' . '' r . hli
'. M.... I, . . 1 (N, ..
I.• ~J" ."
cnt i m ~ges to mind in e~e h of us. Perh ~p s some of us envisio n the frescoes and statues of the [t~lian R el1~; s s ane e or C hriSlO's umbrellas. while oth ers
~lu " • • ,.
"
.1 societ y;
' '100). p. ' " .
their purpose may be to invcsngarc and reveallhe memory co n-
tained in the ground beneath a "public site, " mark ing ou r passages as ~ people and re-visioning official histOry. As art ists creal ing the rnouum ents
· N , •. • M" rA •• """''''' ... I.... "III~". .. J.I A• ••'(Cm.... C. "f.
rel="nofollow">lII,,,,," N...... (""""'..
~ . "r
CAli , •• •
of t he nineties, the ultima te question far us to co nsider is, What shall we choo se to memorialize In o ur lim e?
... . ).0 1'
10, II.... .
' ,, ,,. . ,.' 1)<'• • , J. " ... ." " J '''' ''' '. C,.. ••I ' . ~ J Il'...,. n,.1.. . ., ~ · J. II" . .. . , .· A C ,,,", , M•• ,I,
O ver the pnst t wenty years ~ s .1 public artis t, I have been stru ck by how our co mmo n legacy in public art is deriv ed from the "cannon -in-rhc-
'_ .f Nol'" (N,.. Y• •~ : Ro."'d", ''''' ),, 1'' I ~' _n. I I . J,....
ft,....... .. ., "d..., ' , " U ).;. C", _ lf "
'
. , " ' . 'f
"' ~ .0.1.·
M.I.,,,.I,.,"II..,,,,..,. , d. R" k Si",o.,o. "
"' ." , W,I ~ .. fS. ;., ~ ,"'. M" • .' <:"''''011 ~"". 1,n). p, I. I} 1.0" R I ,p~ .. d. ' l h, t"><. ,,,,, ,. Ii' '';M '" A" ,' i. 0 I I 1•• " .
I.,,,,.. , ~ , ' 11,,, 1'" ,,,.,,, A"
.0" "
(N, ... y.,~ , f•.• • nu"""
at Sunda y picnics. T he pur pose was to evoke a l ime past in which d' e , . d 1'. I',i<, i. ' 110." /II.... nO ' ('01 , ), ,-11 ,
"splendid lriumphs" and "struggles of o ur forefathers" shifted the co urse
",,,i<
." 'lu"" .••
u.'",
". I. "'1', ,,1,,..,,, ,1.""'«1 ,,,, .. ,,, ly ' 0 ,h" ,uh!<" m, " .. ,. ,,", ,~ II , ,,"
par k" impuls e, which causes us to d rag Oil! the rusty cannons fro m pas! wars, po lish them up, an(l place the m in the park fo r ehild ren to crawl over
I " ').~ . lll ,
'I>,h",d T",;,.. " """ i ",· 101" i. , Cui," " o( Vi."h, l"f. · N ~C '" )ou,• •',' " I. lot, h,' lh•• ,ly " ,""". I' " 1). ~" " ••, ~ " .1f ...J • • ", h" '.p'."~ '. '"' ' p, ,, ,,, m, d;.,..", m,o, p' ''''''' I•• m p'''''' '0 publ' . 10"", '
I." ,
.I
M'r" 11", 1,,,,, ,, ,,", ,y.. !'"" .m
·~h~r'.~
V,II.,. v."•. I. TI" "
r,..,... . . d 1. M.,."
,", ' , ,,,1. , 1'1, .. G' n" ruM;, """ .'
c.li(o.".. ( .o!l". ~ I "'" , lid C"f" . O, ~ I, nd . "1 0 " ,. . 0"
".,
"'l'."'" hy ,h,
I ' . , ",
of history. These expositions were meant to inspir e an awe of o ur gre.1 t nation's power to assert its militar y will and prevail over enemies. Runnin g o ur hands over the po lished bro nze, we shared in these victor ies and became cnlisrcdio these causes. Never mind if fo r us as peopl e of colo r they were not o ur forefath ers, o r even if the triumphs were often over our own peop le. A more co ntempo rary example of di sp!~ ying cannons in th e par k
M ~ lI in W~ sh
I ' . l.yn. S... d" . " . M, ppinS ' "' T, m '.- 'Y. 'f <><;o",.
occurred dur ing the prom enade of military weapons
II . l'h, , ~ I, " ..,,,, f,om • """ " lou . d, d " D,,,;. , ,o. 11<11 ,. 1.>,. .... f. ~hnd . i . ' ~ « : " 'SO' ,' ,h, .Id« i, ..... d.f " . " ....,,, h" 'p."d ,. NOI,h A",,,K,. ' 0" "'" ' . d.d,o, C on,• • i • . M, II... U. ,• .., ,,•. U ~" "" ' 1 01 M ."" ~ u"", , A., h, ,, ,. •"d ,~ , (;. 1'1"," ,. (;011" • • 1A", . nd (;" h" O.~ I,nd. ' '''''''l .,h , ,, .
ingron, D.C. , immed iately aftef America declared victory in the G ulf
.
,
0 11 the
War. In an exhibition prepared fo r A m e r i c ~ n families in rho adlo ini'll; Slllil hso n;al1 Insnnnion Ha ll of Science, a grandfatherly voice (sollnll' "g
'" ,a
.... OU .. O"u
rcmu kably like Ronald Ru gan) soothed us into believing the war was a
pun ,c u , IN ' N' " ' . CU' ' U"' '' ' OC" ..
wh ich displaced a historic Mexican community; Bunker Hill, now home
bloodless, compllu:rized science demonstra tion of gigantic proport ions.
to a premier arts center, which displaced aeorhe r; and the less well docu -
Young American men with adroit reflexes trained by:t video -game ClillU re
mented hin or y of how four major freeways intersected in the middle of
demonStraled our superi ority as a nation over Saddam H ussein th rough
East Los Angeles's Chicano communities. O ne of the mOSl eatastrc phic
video-sc reen slrategic air strikes. From the Irium pha nt bronze general on horseback-the public's
consequ ences of an endless real estate boom was the concreting of the enrire Los Angeles River, on which the ciry was fou nded. T he river, as the
view of which is rhe underside of gallopi ng hooves-to its more contem-
earth 's arte ries- thus atr ophi ed and hardened-ccrened a giant scar across
pou.ry corpo rate versions, we find eumpln of public an in the service of dominance. By the ir daily presence in our lives, these artw ork s intend to
the land whic h served to furth er divide an already divided city. II is this metap hor that inspired my own half-mile-long mu ral on the history of
~rs uade us of the justice of the seu they represent. The power of the
ethnic peoples painted in the Los Angeles river conduit. Ju st a$ yo ung
corpo rate spo nsor is embodied in the sculptu re su nding in front of the
C hicanos la UOO battle scars on their bodies, the Grtaf Wall of LOJ Angeles
Inwer;ng office build ing. T hese grand work s, like their military predeces-
is a tatt oo on a scar where the river once ran.' ln it reappear the disa p-
sors in the park s, inspire a sense of awe by their K;lle and the importance of the artist. Here, public art is unashamed in its int ention 10 mediate
peared stones of eth nic populations th at make up the labor force which built our city, srarc, and nation .
between Ihe public and Ihe developer. In a - lhings go do wn beuc r with public u t" ment alu y, the biue r pills of developm ent arc deli vered 10 the
many inna nces, art uses beauty as a false promise of inclusion . Beauty
publ ic. While percent -fer -art bills have heralded developers' creation of amenable public places as a positive side effeel of Kgrowth," every inch of urban space is swallowed by skyscrapers and privatized inlo the so-ca lled public space of shopping malls and corporate plazas. T hese developm ents predcrermi nc the pub lic, selecting O UI the homeless, vendon, :tdo leseents,
Public art often plays a suppo rtive role in develope rs' agendas. In ameliora tes the erasure of ethnic presence, serving the transformation into a homogenized visual culture: give them something beautiful to stand in for the loss of their right to a public presence. Two N ew York - based artis ts w('re selected to decor ate the lobby of the new skyscrape r of First Interstate Bank in downtown Los Angeles. To represent muh iw hur alism
urban poor, and people of color. Planters, benches. and other· public arllen;ties Karc suspect as potential hazards or public loitering places. Re-
in Los Angeles, they chose angels from the Basilica. of Santa Maria dq;li
cent attempts in Los Angeles to pass laws 10 stop or severely restrict push-
Europ ean angels, "b orr owingKthe pr e-Columbian feathered serpent
cart vCIlI/cdorCI from sd ling tloItJ, fr ut,u , pa/ef tlf. and raJpadoJ made
Qucrzalcoetl from the Au ecs, the cro wned mahogany headpiece from Nigerian masks, and the eagle's wings from our N ative peoples as "em-
aelivists of noruggreesive merchants who had silemly approp riated pub lic
Angeli near Assisi, h aly. Th ey then lacked eth nic emblems ont o the
spaces in lar ~e1 y Latino sections of our city. Vendt dorcJ, loved by the
blems of a variety of cultu res." Th ese symbols replaced th e real voices of
peop le for offering not only pop ular produ cts but familiar reminders of
people of colo r in a city torn by the greatest civil disord er in the United
their hom elands, provide a Latino presence in pub lic spaces. Any 105$ of
States in decades. At the ded icatio n, which loo k place shortly after the
bottf nicaJ, mtrcadoJ, vcndtJo res, and things familiar reinforces segreg:!-
as ,1 100110 colonize and displace elhnie commu nities. l nh mous develop-
rebellion (the Los Angeles riots of 1992), black and Lai no children unveiled the angels in an elaborate ribbo n-cutti ng ceremony . Hailed by the developers u a great symbol of · unity,- these artifacts stood in for the real peopl e in a city terrified of the majoril Yof its citizens. Tragiea.lly, the
ments abou nd in public record , if not consciousness-Dod ger Stadiu m,
SSOO,OOOspent on this single work was more than the whole eifYbudgel
non. as ethnic people disappear 10 anot her corner of the city. Los Angeles provides clear and abundant eumplcs of developmen t
10
fund public murals by et hnic arlisu who wo rk wilhin Los Angeles's
co ncept o l " ma.n over natur e- on .....hich Ihis count ry was founded, a heri-
d iverse C hinese, African America n, Korean. T hai, Ch icano, and Unl NI
tage of thought t hat has brou ght us c1ear·cuning in first growth fore us and
American neighbo rhoods. Nn singk view of public space and Ihe arl Ihal occup ies il will wo rk
co ncrete co nduiu t hat kill rivers as an acceptabl e meth od of flood co ntrol.
in a mct ro po li., of multiple perspectives. While compeliliorl lor publ ic
T hese: ideas find rheir parallel in the late mode rnist and poStmodernist culu 01the exalted individual, in which personal vision and originality are
space ~ro w s daily, cult unl communilies call for if to be used in d r;l.mali-
highly valued. As a solitary creato r the artin values self-expressio n and
cally d ifferenl ways. Wha t co mes into qu estio n is th e very d ifferenl sensi-
"artistic freedom" (or separateness ral her than co nnectedness). H e is
bilities or ord er and beauty that op erat e in different cultures. When
therefore responsible o nly 10 himself rather t han to a shared vision, failing
Cilriuo, for example, loo ked lo r the firsl lime at £ 1Tejo n Pass, he saw
10 recon cile the individual to the whole.
pOlelllial. He saw the po lent ial lo create beau ty wit h a pcrso nal vision
Whe n the nature of El Tejon Pu s-a place k now n to locals for its
imposed on thc landsc.ape-a bc.auty th.at fil his individual vision of yello w
high winds-asserted iu elf d uring C hris to's project and up roo ted an
umbrellas flunering in the wind, march ing up tbe sides of rolling hills.
um brella planl ed in the ground, causing the tragic death of a woman who
TIle land became his canvas, a backdro p for his perso nal aesthetic. Native peop le might loo k atlhe same landscape wilh a very differ-
had co me 10 see the wo rk, C hriSto said, "My pro ject imitates real life." I co uld n't help musing o n what a diffe rent project it would have been had
cut idea nf beauty, a beauty withoUl impositio n. T hey mighl sec a per'[ect
the beautiful yellow umbrellas march ed through Skid Ro w, where L05
orde r exemplified in nature itself, imegral ln a spirit ual life gro unded in
Angel es's 140,000 ho meless lie in t he rain . Art can no long er be tied to the
place. Nature is not to be tampered with ; hence, a plant taken requires an
no nfuncrionalist st ate, relegated by an "arl for art 's sake- t yranny. Would
offering in return . Richard Ray Whi tman, a Yaqu i arlist, said, ·Scienlifi-
it nOIhave been more beautiful to shelter peop le in need of sheller, a ges·
cally co hesive-I am the ato ms, molecules, blood , and du n of my ances-
tu re and state ment abo ut ou r failure as a society to provi de even the most
to rs-not as histo ry, but as a co ntinuing people. We describe o ur culture
basic needs 10 the poor? Why is it nOt possible for public art to do more
as a circle. by which we mean lhn it is an iht egrated whole .-, Maintaining
Ihan · imitate-life? Pub lic art co uld be j1/Seplmtbfe Iro m the daily life or
a relatio nship wilh the dun of one's ancestors requ ires a generatio nal
the people for which it is created . Developed
rcl.u io nship with ,he land and a respectful rreatmcm of ot her life found
puh lic space, it cou ld have a fu nction with in the co mmunity and even
011
the land . O r perhaps N ative peoples could not rhink o r this area with ou t
recalling FOr! Tejo n, o ne of Ihe nrs t Ca lifornia Ind ian reservations esob-
10
live harmoniou sly in
provide a venue fo r t heir voices. For t he Mexican sensibility, an impor tant manifesta tion of pub lic ar t is a wo rk by Mexican artis t David Alfaro Siquciros o n Los Angeles's
lished ncar t his site in rhe Tehachap i Moumains, placed the re to " pro tect"
hist oric O lvera Suect. Thi s 19J 3 mural, pain ted o ver fo r nearly sixly years
Ind ians rounded u p Iro m various neighbo ring areas, most of whose cui-
by city fathers becau se of its portrayal of the plighl of Mnicanos and
l ures have be en en tirely dest royed . In C hristo's and the Na tive visions we
C hicanos in Califo rnia, is currently in resroreeion. Siqueiros depic ted as
have IWOd ifferen l aeSlhelic sensibilities, as divergent as the nineteenth -
the central figures a mestizo shooling at the American eagle and a crucified
century English manicu red garden is from t he rugged natura l New Mexi·
C hieanoiMexicano. Whi le Ihis mu ral is beco mingM useo·ficd, with mil-
can landscape of the Sangre de C risto Moun u ins. Perhaps a less benign implicatio n of C hristo's idea is that landscape
lions of dollars pro vided by t he Gett y foundat ion lor its preser vation and
untouch ed by man is "un dcvelopcdland." T his is a coruin uario n of the
images would most likely be censored if paint ed today on Los Angeles's
'"
re-presentatio n 10 the publi c, it is impo rtant to recognize t hat the same
'"
r streets. T he subject maner is u relevant no w. sixty years later, as it was
mU la ge from the boy in tht' principal's o ffice said, - I need you to come
then. Murals de picting the domi nat ion o f and resistance by l os Angeles's
her e righl away because I' m going to get Ih ro wn OUt of school again.·
Latinos or ot her po pulations of color provok e the "me official resistance
My deal with the boy, fo rmulated over a long merno rship, waslhilt he
u they d id in 19) ) , Despitc t hese s l ru &gl e~. mur als have been the o nly
wo uld not quit schoo l agilin with out talk ing to me firn. I arri ved to find
interventio ns in pu blic spaces that art iculat e the p resence of erhniciry .
the principal towcring o ver the young (bolo, who was holdin g his head in
Arch ile
a dcfiant manner I had seen ov er ilnd over in my wor k with the gangs.
tics o f colo r in OUTcilY.
Th is stance, reminiscent o f a wurior, called unce remo nio usly - ho ld ing
As co mp<:litin n fo r pub lic space has gro w n, pu blic U I po licies have
yo ur mug,- is abou t maintaininGd ignity in adverse eirt u msu nccs. The
beco me calcified and increasingly bur eau cratic. An Ill,,! is um::tio ned h...s
p rincipal was co mpletely frust rated . " You' ve writte n o n t he school's walls
lost th e polit ic,,] bi te o r th e sevent ies mur,,1s. Nev ertheless. a rich legacy of
and yo u simp ly d o not have respect for ot her people's pro perty. Tell me,
murals ha been produced since Amt r;,. Tropicltl was painted on O lvera
would yo u do this in you r ow n house! " I co uld n't help but smile at his
Srreet by the maest ro. T ho un nds o f public mu rals in places wh~r~ people
adm o nition , d espite the serious ness o f th e situation. This boy was an
live "nd work have become tanGib l~ pub lic mo num ents 10 the shared
imponant gn ffiti arti n in his co mmu nity. I had visited his house and sct'n
ellperience o f cOlnmullitit's of col or. C hiuno mu rals have provided the
t he walls o f his roo m, where every inch was co vered with his int rie:u e
l e ~ d t' r sh ip
writings. Two differ ent notions o f uea.uty and o rd er were o per~li ng , as
and the form for o ther co mmu nities to assert their presence and
artitu lale t heir issues. Today, wo rks appear th at speak o f child ren caught
well as a disp ute abo ut o wners hip o f the school. Th e bo y's o pinio n was
in t ht trnss fire of gang warfare in the burios of Sylmu , the hidd en penh-
thilt he had au thetiully imp roved the propert y, nOt d estro yed it.
lem o f AIDS in the Sout h-Central Afriu n America n co mmu nity, and the
At [h is ti me the co nd itio ns o f ou r co mmu nities are wo rse Iha n t hose
sn uggles o f i m m i~n t io n and 'Issimil:u io n in the Korea n co mmuni ty. T hese
thilt precipitated the civil rig hts activ ism o f t he sixtics and seven ties. Fifry-
mu rals have becom e mo nu ments that serv e 'ISa co mmunit y's memory.
two percent of all African American children and Iony-twc perc cnt o f all
Th e gene ration s who grew up in neighbo rhood s whe re the land scape was dcned by t he munl mo vement have been influen ced by these
Lati no childr en arc living in po vert y. Dropout rates exceed high schoo l graduation ratt's in these co mmun itics. W hat, t hen, is the ro le o f a soc ially
wo rks. Wit h few avenues o pe n to training.and art p rod uc tio n, eth nic
re-spon sible public artist? As the wealth y and poo r are increasing ly po lar-
tecn ilgers have created the graffit i art that has beco me another met hod o f
ized in o ur soc iet y, Ieee-to- face urba n co nfro ntations occ u r, o fte n with
rC5ist ing priu t iud pub lic space. As th e 11m visual art form ent irely devel-
eatasirc phic co nsequences. Ca n pub lic art avoid co rning down o n the side
o ped by yo ut h cultu re, it hn beco me the focu s o f increasingly severe
o f wealth and d ominance in that co nfro ntat ion? H ow can we as an isu
repr isals by aut ho rities w ho spend fillJ-two m illion doll. ,., an nually in Ihe
"void becoming acco mplices to t o lo nizatio n? If we chose not
Ccun ry o f Los Angeles to abatc what they refer to as the - ski n caneer o f
tr iump hs over nations and neigh bo rhoods as vict ories and adv ancements,
soc ict y.- It is no ilccid cnt thilt thc proliferat io n o f graffiti is co ncu rrent
w hat monu ment s co uld we build? How can we create a public memor y
wit h the redu ct ion of all youth recreat ion and
fo r a many -cultured societ y? Wh ose sto ry shall we tell?
nl S
programs in the schoo ls.
Work ing with communities in producing pu blic artwo rks has put
10
loo k al
O f great esr interest to me is t he in vention of syste ms o f " vo ice
me into co ntact with many o f t hese yo uths. On o ne occ asio n, 1 wu called
giving" for tho se left wil ho ut pu blic vee ues in which to speak, Socially
to a loca l high school after having co nvinced o nc of the yo ung Grc.t W..ll
respo nsible art ists from nlarg inalizcd co mm u nities have a pariicular re.
p roduction tcam members t hat he sho uld retu rn 10 school. The urgent
sponsibility to art ieulate the co nditio ns o f thei r people- and to prov ide
__ .._..
~--~ .
..
~ - - -------- _
_
_ __..
........
...
_--
cata lysIs for change. since percepti on s o f U$ as ind ividu als aT C tied to the co nd itions of o ur co mmu nities in a racially u nsophisticat ed soc iety. We
CO M M O N W O R K
)J~ff Krllr y
canno t escape t hat respo nsibility even when we choos e to lrYi we are made o f the " blood and du st - o f ou r ancesto rs in a con tinuing histo ry. Being 11 calalyst for change will change us also .
We can evaluate ou rselves by rhe processes w ieh w hich we choose
to make an , not simply by the art ob jects we create. Is t he artw ork the
Ov er the past decade, those of us interested in a serious and challenging
result of a pr ivate act in a pub lic spa cc~ Focusing on the object devoid of
pub lic art have heard often of the benefits of collabo ration between u tists and archite<:lS. Th e convention al w i ~ d om is that ul i st ~ bri og a fresh. uncn-
t he creative pr oc ess used to ach ieve it has ba nkrupted Eu rocc ntric mod -
ernis t and posl modc rn in traditi o ns. Art proces ses, ju st as art objects. may
be cultu rally specific. and with no single aesthet ic, a diverse society will generate very different form s of public art. Who is the public now that it hu changed color? H ow do peop le of
cumbered sense of design to architeclUral projects, and that the peculiaritics of the artist's ego-tenter 50mchow enliven the otherwise conventional, corpo rate'sqJl t environments arehittcts come up with too much of the time. The artisr is assumed to be Irccr than the architect. and freedom is assumed
various ethnic and e1u s groups use public space? What ideas do we want
to be art. The architcct is rcgard ed as a relative technician by comparison,
to place in pub lic memory? Where does art begin and end ? ArtistShave the
constrained as he or she is by the legal, fiscal. and material lilllitations of the trade. The idea is that as artists and arch itccts ·eo ltabora te~ architecture ""ill lx: made mort human, or at lean more art-lik('. Art- likenes.s is assumed 10 be mor e humane.
unique ability to transcend designated spheres of activity. What rep resents something deepe r and mor e hopeful about the futur e of our eth nically and clan-divided cities arc collaoo n tions that move well beyo nd the Ht ist and architect to the artist and the histor ian, scientist. environmentalist. or social service provider. Such collaborations Ire mand ated by the seriousness of
Conventional wisdom aside, true colbboratinn among artists and architccts rarely happens. Given the stereotypical ways in which we sec
the tasks at hand. They bring a n nge of people into conversations about their visions for their neighbo rhoods or their nation s. Finding a place for those ideas in monuments thlt are constructed of the soil and spirit of the
each other. it's no wo nder. What passes today for collabo ratio n tends in fact to be a frustrating process of co mpromise and co ncession. Th e archi-
people is the lOon challenging task for public art ists in th is time.
services. often must fight for recognition as members of a ~ design team:
tect is almon always in charge. and artists, wh o arc paid very little for their Moreover, in Our society the conditions arc not ulually safe for collabora-
N O T ES
110/ too ".f'In.,.;"' , ,......, lo4 ~ . " . .. 01j_. ,~ , ""'~I 1_' l~k... ~ I, • ' _ _ ""r'~'''''' 01 of ;,,' K." . _ ,..... _"' , 4..11. 1" , k,,'.....,1I<""'J.. tK k, •••1II. , 1m " ' 01 C.I""' ·, ~I._, I ,h. PO"""'" of .. _ ... ,..;.-" 1... , _ I" Ik l ooi" « I k i. ,h. Lot " "".1" A_ ."",,01 .k l I, n... G... ,
.........,Io,
tion to occur. Th e loss of professiona l identity is at stake. and in corpe n te America, professional ident ity is often all one has. Given this territor ial antagon ism and the bureaucratic hassles of the public sector (which i~ usually the designated "client - in 11 public art{archi,ecture pro ject), many artists have simply given up and gone back to the studio. Perhaps the most typical misunderstanding archilecu have about artisu is that they want to build "art " into the project,or that they want to make the architecture iuel (; that is, that artists want to play at being archi' ects. There is some truth 10 this. Perhaps the most typica l misunderstand ing
".
'"