Un-documents By W W Winther, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Nov 21, 2001 Ambassade d‘Australie 4, r Jean Rey FR-75015 Paris France

VOILÀ — L‘OCCASION FAIT LE LARRON ! Cf phone conversation the 13th inst — The registered letter sent you the 5th inst (cf enc Certificate of Posting) is evidently stolen by Norwegian police officers — probably with reticent approval from noisomely depraved senior state officials in, e.g, the Norwegian government. In corresponding solicitation one sharply accentuate that Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 18 and 19 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights repeatedly, continuously and premeditatedly had been rampageously violated by Norwegian authorities since — at least — 1992. Norwegian police has earlier thieved registered mail to, v.g, the American and French embassies item the Human Rights Committee. Described interception acutely violates sections 145 and 145a etc in the Norwegian Penal Code, and does also — very clearly — infringe Articles 24 item 27 (paragraphs 1 and 2, v Article 31 ib) in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), cf Articles 35 (paragraphs 1–2) and 43 ib in the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963). The downright corruption and hell-destined iniquity abidingly displayed by Norwegian magistracy in juxtaposed facts of nearby case, are unparalleled in 1 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

modern monarchic history of law, and execrable diabolism and gangrenous ghoulishness interosculates their exceedingly opprobrious criminality. I enclose a copy of my application for political asylum dated the 5th inst, and some documents highlighting selected counts vs Norwegian authorities.

Sincerely yours,

Wilhelm Werner Winther cc: Secretariat of the CPT, FR-67075 Strasbourg Cedex, France.

2 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Jul 09, 2001 Amnesty International 99–119 Rosebery Ave London EC1R 4RE UK

NOTA BENE May 2nd this y the Norwegian King in Council of State was forwarded enc teletransmissive, ―Hans-Petter Jahre — suspension/dismissal‖ (03 — three — pp), by registered mail. Although Norwegian police stole the receipt, corresponding letter is testified received by the royal house in Oslo (cf certificate of posting and adjacent signature belonging to the King‘s private secretary — v, respectively, cotransmissives A & B). In spite of telephonic reminders/requests the King‘s secretary has — much as expected — not replied to our communication. The 4th inst the King‘s archivist et al was told we intended to lodge an appeal to an international court of justice if an appropriate and written answer not reached us today — a legal compte rendu to The Human Rights Committee (Geneva, Switzerland) is initiated. The cotransmissive ―Woe Unto You, Norway‖ was composed Good Friday (April 13, 2001).

Wilhelm Werner Winther 3 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

May 01, 2001

The King in Council of State Oslo, Norway

HANS-PETTER JAHRE — SUSPENSION/DISMISSAL Hans-Petter Jahre, Esq, was appointed accessary Director General of Public Prosecutions by the King‘s Council on Jan 09th 1998, and has ex officio recidivistic and arrogantly disgraced his office by extensive and intentional malversation — particularly in civil proceedings and formal complaint connections where the suspected party and accused persons were police employees, senior state officials or, otherwise, public servants. Mr Jahre‘s absolutely unacceptable irresponsibility and loathsome corruption are clearly manifested in his letter/decision of the 04th prev m (cf enc‘s A, N, O, P, R & S) where he — without criminal investigation — drops notifications encompassing v.g;



premeditated homicides, attempted murder and complicity to manslaughter/-slaying (cf enc‘s B, C, D & Q),



gross vandalism, burglary, illicit search/seizure and aggravated thefts (cf enc‘s C, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, N, O & P),



comprehensive/systematic corruption, forgery, misdemeanor/felony and extensive dereliction of duty (cf enc‘s B, C, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R & S), 4 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT



false accusations, illegal deprivation of liberty and unlawful detention in custody (cf enc‘s F, G & H),



torture/molestation, illegitimate monitoring/surveillance, defamations, assaults and breach of precedents item duty of secrecy (cf enc‘s B, C, E, F, H, I, L, Q & R).

I refer to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Articles 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19 and demand Hans-Petter Jahre, Esq, immediately suspended/dismissed from his present office in accordance with the Civil Service Act sec‘s 15, 16 and 17 — cf sec 6 ib item the Constitution sec 22 and the Criminal Procedure Act sec 56 etc. Mr Jahre should, without delay, be subjected to independent criminal investigation/proceedings and charged/sentenced in agreement with Norwegian law.

Wilhelm Werner Winther Enclosures:



A: Administrative decision from the public prosecutor in Møre/Romsdal,



B: information about the police etc,



C: a small apropos (Feb 19th, ‘01),



D: another apropos, 5 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT



E: report de jure vs police officials,



F: formal complaint vs police officials (Feb 01th, ‘01),



G: notification vs police officials (Feb 07th, ‘01),



H: complaint vs Sunnmøre police station (Ålesund),



I: report vs police employees (Oct 15th, ‘01),



J: formal complaint vs police employees (Feb 05th, ‘01),



K: notification vs police employees (Jan 26th, ‘01),



L: illicit monitoring/surveillance,



M: complaint to the EOS-committee,



N: appeal to the Director General of Public Prosecutions,



O: formal complaint vs Ivar Svendsgaard, Esq,



P: formal complaint vs Jan Hoel, Esq,

6 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT



Q: letter from Kåre Torvholm, Esq,



R: accessory information,



S: drop of case, Director General of Public Prosecutions.

7 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

May 11, 2001 WSO-MR/WWW/hrv 01 The Registrar European Court of Human Rights Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France

SUBJ: HUMAN RIGHTS — VIOLATIONS OF, This communication should be submitted for consideration under Article 34 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (as amended by Protocol No. 11) asap.

I. Information concerning the author of the Communication Name: Winther First names: Wilhelm Werner Nationality: Norwegian Profession: WSO-representative Date/place of birth: May 17th, ‘63, Norway Present address: Åsen 4, NO-6270 Brattvåg, Norway All replies to nearby complaint must be sent as registered letters or conveyed by an authorized courier. Submitting communication as: Appointed representative and legal counsel of the victim who is a member of the organization We Shall Overcome (WSO).

8 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

II. Information concerning the victim Name: Håndlykken First names: Ole Martin Nationality: Norwegian Profession: Carpenter Date/place of birth: Feb 09th, ‘64, Norway Present address: Brusdalsvegen 341, NO-6011 Ålesund, Norway The victim is presently incarcerated at PST Brøset, NO-7440 Trondheim, Norway. No crimes has been committed, and Mr Håndlykken constitutes no danger nor nuisance to anybody.

III. State concerned/articles violated/domestic remedies Hereby one legally summons the Kingdom of Norway for protracted, premeditated, numerous and severe violations of Articles 1, 3, 5 (subsec‘s 1 & 4), 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. All administrative appeal bodies has been exhausted nationally and Norwegian authorities, generally, do almost anything to illegally prevent the forthcoming and actual effectuation of appeals like nearby communication. Norwegian authorities has hitherto manifested nothing but depraved disrespect for international declarations and covenants of human rights when independent/ extraterritorial investigators potentially could uncover the heinous corruption which, especially the 5 last years, have infected increasingly larger parts of the official functions in the country.

IV. Other international procedures This matter has been attempted submitted for examination/registration etc under the Human Rights Committee, Geneva (Switzerland) — cf our certificates of posting (enc F), but all postal items has vanished and we‘ve been constantly and illegally counteracted by Norwegian police wiretapping our telephones, intercepting/stealing telefacsimiles/letters, electronically monitoring the emission from our PCs, preventing free access to the WWW and AV surveilling our private residences.

9 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

V. Facts of the claim Mr Håndlykken has repetitively faced compulsory psychiatric commitments and coerced I.M. injections with debilitating neurotoxins* (*qe neuroleptics) since 1985. He has, practically nonstop, lamented the multifarious and grave side effects of the highly undesirable magistral/psychotropic drugs forcedly inserted to all relevant appeal courts and appellate bodies in Norway, without deserved approval and emancipation from the chemical strait jacket effectively suppressing — and gradually annihilating — his deeper and more subtle emotions and intellectual functions. Håndlykken, Esq, who is fundamentally religious, particularly regret that the long-lasting iatrogenic maltreatment and extensive nosocomial etc abuse of chronically noxious substances qualitatively enfeeble his spiritual contemplation, biblical delectation en règle, and overall comprehension — especially of complex tropological paragraphs and the holistic application of noologically demanding parables configurationally. Voluntary and rather copious intake of parasympatholytic (anticholinergic) medicaments has proven approximately useless, and has evidently only aggravated the victims somatopsychic misery. Mr Håndlykken rightfully perceive described chemopsychiatric assault as an orthomolecular abomination, a pharmaceutical disaster and as regular torture acutely infringing, v.g., Articles 3, 5 and 8 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The psychiatric drug most frequently thrust on Håndlykken, Esq, ―Cisordinol Depot‖ — ―Zuclopenthixoli decanoas‖ (qe ―Clopixol‖ — ―zuclopenthixol décanoate‖), mainly — chemoreceptoric — affect the dopaminergic receptors D1 and D2 and thus — like other thioxanthènes (which has many chemical and pharmacologic similarities to the ―phenothiazines‖) — lack intrinsic and plausible biochemical/pharmacodynamic usw affinity to the basilar etiology epistemic partaken, nominally and actually, by mental disorders like, e.g., psychoses. Do also take a further look at the composition of the neuroleptic ―Navane‖ (―thiothixene hydrochloride‖), a thioxanthene derivative: N,N-dimethyl-9-[3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)propylidene]thioxanthene-2-sulfonamide. From this, thinking about the molecular structure, we‘ll understand that the ―thioxanthenes‖ differ from, v.g, ―phenothiazines‖ by the replacement of nitrogen in the central ring with a carbon-linked side chain fixed in space in a rigid structural configuration — spero meliora! Among adverse reactions connected to psychiatric abuse of Cisordinol one but mention: Tardive dyskinesia (irreversible), Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS), tachycardia, hypotension, syncope, EKG changes, drowsiness, 10 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

restlessness, agitation, insomnia, hyperreflexia, cerebral edema, cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities, (pseudo-)parkinsonism, akathisia, dystonia, elevations of serum transaminase and alkaline phosphatase, leukopenia, leucocytosis, agranulocytosis, eosinophilia, hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia, rash, pruritus, urticaria, photosensitivity, anaphylaxis, exfoliative dermatitis, xerostomia, blurred vision, nasal congestion, constipation, increased sweating, salivation, impotence, miosis, mydriasis, adynamic ileus, hyperpyrexia, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, increased appetite/weight, weakness, fatigue, polydipsia, peripheral edema, CNS depression, torticollis, tremor, dysphagia, muscular twitching, disturbance of gait, oculogyric crisis, frigidity, urinary retention, amenorrhea, gynecomastia, galactorrhea, hyperprolactinemia, coma and sudden death (often from cardiac arrest or asphyxia). It‘s also, indeed, factually and immanently irrelevant whether Mr Håndlykken‘s theocentric dissent, soteriological confusion and doxological inclination have a psychopathological origin and foundation, as long as he satisfactorily care for himself, is law-abiding and not evolve menacing or unacceptable burdening manners. Cf Articles 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 14 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The victims religious preoccupation is the only and real cause for the unilaterally nocent contact with the psychiatric establishment forced on him by arrogant, ochlocratic and dianoetically wanting officials here in Norway. WSO utterly condemn national and strictly personal conduct suppressing the freedom of thought, conscience and religion in above depicted way. Mr Håndlykken has severely suffered both physically, mentally and socioeconomically through his involuntary tangency with psychiatric institutions and feebleminded physicians, and it‘s beyond doubt that his iatric tribulation and madhouse confinements etc, dreadfully violates Articles 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Speaking about compulsory commitments generally and psychiatric imprisonments dictated by political motives distinctively, Norway has placed itself in an optimally unfavorable and most revealing position in Europe, and WSO need international assistance to efficiently battle governmental/official depravity. The efforts Norwegian authorities, especially the police, has taken to sabotage the origination and fulfillment of this compte rendu and similar documents, unequivocally offend the provisions in Articles 1, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 13 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 11 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

I very strongly, on behalf of Norway, regret that our homeland has turned into a police state wilfully and opportunistically desecrating all international covenants and universal declarations of human rights, and I underscore that a correct and accommodating trial of the case at hand would be a valuable support for us striving to restore a — nowadays — juridically putrefying nation.

VI. DEMAND Ole Martin Håndlykken, Esq, should permanently and readily be exempted from any compulsory contact with the psychiatric apparatus in Norway and elsewhere and appropriate, criminal investigation and proceedings against Norway, be initiated asap. Disciplinary penalty and precautionary measures must be imposed deterrently.

VII. Accessory information and remarks The author of this communication, WSO-representative Wilhelm Werner Winther, did, Oct 25th previous year, dispatch an application for political asylum to the American, French, Russian and British embassies in Norway (Oslo), England (London) and elsewhere — in perfect concordance with Article 14 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In corresponding solicitation one sharply accentuate that Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 18 and 19 in mentioned declaration repeatedly, continuously and premeditatedly had been rampageously violated by Norwegian authorities since — at least — 1992. Everybody investigating Norwegian authorities should be aware the ―cobweboptics‖ now widely abused by their police. The cobweb-optic represents technology hitherto, presumptively, unknown to other countries, and is a most efficient medium for visual surveillance of apartments/offices &c. Abhorrently misusing described spy-tech, highly perverted police employees has, absolutely unlawfully, tried to copy the content in the report close at hand, and the Norwegian government et al will, probably, be informed hereupon by chartered rascals....possibly wearing blue or blackish uniforms with flamboyant distinctions! — The Norwegian government and, particularly, the Ministry of Justice and the Police, has through an appalling lack of sound discernment, dishonesty ex officio and moral decay, put themselves in a devastating catch-22 situation where they — consequently — must deny the sombre truth to avoid global and extraordinarily sweltering disgrace. I have many times and in a plain language, 12 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

warned leading officials in Norway about this nefarious state of affairs, but the authorities in my fatherland have hitherto exhibited nothing but arrogant contempt and dishonorable vindictiveness when rebuked and legally prosecuted for their inauspicious criminality.

Wilhelm Werner Winther Enclosures:



A: Appeal to the Norwegian Board of Health (ie Statens Helsetilsyn) of July 20th, 2000 (02 — two — pp),



B: first application to the Norwegian Board of Health of Oct 12th, 2000 (01 — one — p),



C: reply from the Norwegian Board of Health (Statens Helsetilsyn) of Nov 7th, 2000 (01 — one — p),



D: administrative decision from the county physician (Fylkeslegen) in Møre og Romsdal of July 14th, 2000 (02 — two — pp),



E: first application to the county physician in Møre og Romsdal of Jan 11th, 2001 (01 — one — p),



F: certificates of posting (01 — one — p),

13 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT



G: communication to the Human Rights Committee, Geneva (06 — six — pp),



H: formal complaint vs police officials of Feb 01th, 2001 (02 — two — pp),



I: another copy of nearby writ of summons (06 — six — pp).

PS: The European Court of Human Rights should feel completely free to obtain additional background information etc — if desirable and necessary.

14 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Feb 05, 2001 SEFO PO box 632 NO-6501 Kristiansund N Norway Att: Mr. Ivar Svendsgaard

POLICE OFFICIALS — REPORT DE JURE VS, On Oct 25th previous year I teletransmitted an application for political asylum to the American, French, Russian and British embassies in Norway and England which — horribile dictu — were, absolutely illegally, electronically intercepted and read by Norwegian police employees wiretapping my telephone. Described crime acutely violates sections 145 and 145 a. in the Norwegian Penal Code, and I herby demand the police officials guilty, legally prosecuted and sentenced. Mentioned interception does also, very clearly, infringe Articles 24 item 27 (paragraphs 1 and 2, v Article 31 ib) in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) — cf Articles 35 (paragraphs 1–2) and 43 ib in the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963). Nearby report might be reviewed and adjudicated etc by the International Court of Justice (The Hague, Netherlands).

Wilhelm Werner Winther 15 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Riksadvokaten Stortorvet 2 Oslo

ANMELDELSE AV IVAR SVENDSGAARD Ivar Svendsgaard, 6520 Frei, er leder for SEFO i Møre/Romsdal/Sogn/Fjordane og virker som herredsdommer ved Nordmøre herredsrett, Kristiansund. En har i dag hatt telefonisk kontakt med hr Svendsgaard og Jan Hoel, Statsadvokatene i Møre/Romsdal/Sogn/Fjordane, som begge nekter å utlevere gjenpart av SEFOs beslutning om å henlegge en anmeldelse hvor politi/lensmannsansatte begjæres etterforsket/siktet/tiltalt/straffet for bl.a skadeverk, innbrudd, illegal husinkvisisjon og grovt tyveri av mer enn kr 2000. Ifølge et skriv fra Jan Hoel datert 19. fm (cf kotransmissiv), har SEFO i Møre/Romsdal/Sogn/Fjordane henlagt anmeldelsen ―....idet det ikke er påviselig grunn til å etterforske....osv‖. Hr Svendsgaard var i likhet med Hoel, Esq, erklært inhabil i korresponderende sak, kfr strpl § 60 2.–4. pt (v dl § 106 pkt 1 og 6, jf § 108 ib) item fvl § 6 bokstav a samt 2. t.o.m. 4. pt. —— Man viser til FNs Internasjonale Konvensjon om Sivile og Politiske Rettigheter, spesielt Artikkel 14 1.–2. pt, og understreker at Norge ingenlunde er tjent med notorisk korrupsjon av det slaget Ivar Svendsgaard og Jan Hoel konsekvent forfekter. Et land som ønsker å kalle seg en ―rettsstat‖ må vise vilje og evne til å straffeforfølge mv øvrighetspersoner oa når disse gjør seg skyldig i alvorlig kriminalitet. En begjærer hermed Ivar Svendsgaard siktet/tiltalt/straffet for fortsettlig pliktforsømmelse og korrupsjon knyttet til ovennevnte henleggelse, jf strpl § 223 3. pt (jf § 55 pkt 1 ib), tjml §§ 14 og 15, strl ikrl § 10, strl §§ 12, 62, 63, 110, 118, 120, 123, 124, 125, 324 og 325 pkt 1–2. 16 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

05. mars 2001

Wilhelm Werner Winther

Kotransmissiver:  Anmeldelse av Jan Hoel og sistnevntes henleggelse (02 — to — s).

17 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

SEFO v/ Ivar Svendsgaard KR.sund

ANMELDELSE AV POLITI-/LENSMANNSANSATTE Den 02. aug a.p påklaget undertegnede oppførselen til ―visse ansatte‖ ved Sunnmøre politikammer (Ålesund politistasjon), Ålesund, til Justis- og politidept, og begjæring om å sikte/tiltale/straffe de skyldige ble samme dato sendt Statsadvokatene i Møre/Romsdal/Sogn/Fjordane (SEFO har tidl mottatt gjenpart av korresponderende dokumenter). Etter avtale oppsøkte undertegnede 10. aug a.p Lensmannen i Ørskog, hvor Helge Abelvik mottok en anmeldelse rettet, spesielt, imot Ove Finnes ved Haram lensmannskontor, Brattvåg. SEFO har erkjent at anmeldelsen er registrert. Den 12. aug a.p — mens undertegnede er i Sula kommune — tar politi/lensmannsansatte seg inn i Åsen 4, Brattvåg, med falsk nøkkel, og saboterer et stort avløpsrør i husets kjelleretasje. Påfølgende vannlekkasje mv ble utbedret av rørlegger tre dager senere, og forsikringsselskapet Gjensidige underrettes etc. De skyldige i innbruddet/sabotasjen/skadeverket bes siktet/tiltalt/straffet — jf strl §§ 40, 62, 147* (*innbrudd ―forøvet i Hensigt at bane Adgang til nogen anden Forbrydelse‖, kfr 3. pt) og 292 (skjerpende; hevnakt), samt tjml §§ 15 item 16 oa.

05. feb 2001

Wilhelm Werner Winther 18 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Statsadvokatene i Møre og Romsdal/ Sogn og Fjordane, Molde

ANMELDELSE AV POLITI-/LENSMANNSANSATTE Den 11. ds vasket Sigmund Martin Ekrem (f 110748), 6270 Brattvåg, klær i sin privatbolig — bl.a to dongeribukser han etterpå hengte til tørk utenfor huset sitt. Dagen etter, om formiddagen, oppdaget hr Ekrem at buksene hans — sannsynligvis i løpet av natten — var påført større mengder gul maling/lakk (øyensynlig med sprayflaske). Ekrem lot de nå ødelagte buksene henge på klessnoren, og dro straks til Ørskog og Ålesund. Samme ettermiddag når han returnerte til bopel, konstaterte han at buksene var stjålet og at uvedkommende hadde brutt seg inn i hjemmet hans. Beskrevne skadeverk/tyveri/innbrudd etc er begått av politi-/lensmannsansatte, og en begjærer avhørt alle som 12. ds betjente det tekniske person/boligovervåkingsutstyret mv til politi-/lensmannsetaten i Brattvåg (Haram). De skyldige bes siktet/tiltalt/straffet, jf strl §§ 62, 147, 227, 257 (393), 291 (391), 325 pkt 1, 2 og 3, item tjml §§ 15 og 16 mv.

15. okt, 2000

Wilhelm Werner Winther

Sigmund M Ekrem

19 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Justis- og politidept Politiavd Oslo

KLAGE PÅ SUNNMØRE POLITIKAMMER Forløpne halvår har undertegnede via tallrike skriftlige og muntlige henvendelser til jurist Olav Aarø, Sunnmøre politikammer (SUPO), med hjemmel i strpl § 213 mv begjært tilbakelevert materiell — primært dokumenter/dagbøker — beslaglagt under en ulovlig husundersøkelse i Åsen 4, Brattvåg, 04. nov 1996. Hver gang man purrer bedyrer hr Aarø at beslaget snarest skal utleveres, idet han fremholder at etterforsker Frode Asbjørnsen (SUPO) ansporet av personlig fiendskap til ansøker konsekvent saboterer effektueringen. Etter samråd med konstituert lensmann Jens Vidar Bjørkedal, Haram lensmannskontor (Brattvåg), ble SUPOs politimester, Arne S Karoliussen, 19. fm underrettet om beskrevne situasjon og gitt 14 — fjorten — d frist til å påse at eiendelene mine ble returnert. Som ventet har ikke politikammeret etterkommet den tidsbegrensede anmodningen. Adressant og representanter for denne har politianmeldt Karoliussen, Aarø og Asbjørnsen én eller flere ganger tidligere, men utstrakt kameraderi og en defekt SEFO-ordning har hittil umuliggjort effektiv rettsforfølgelse av den notoriske depravasjonen ved SUPO. Politiinspektør Yngve Skovly (SUPO) som signerte korresponderende husinkvisisjonsordre, ble anmeldt første gang 17. aug ‘96 — jf fvl kap II om inhabilitet, Grl § 102 item strl § 116 om ulovlig ransaking. Klagers persekusjon av SUPO-ansatte de jure — cf strpl § 223 — omfatter for øvrig forhold som vg; falsk anklage/forklaring, ulovlig frihetsberøvelse, 20 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

legemsfornærmelse, tortur/legemsbeskadigelse, innbrudd, skadeverk, dokumentfalsk, brudd på taushetsplikt, korrupsjon, ærekrenkelser, illegal telefon-/brevkontroll (for å unndra seg straffeforfølgning) og en lang rekke nøye tilsiktede tjenesteforseelser. En understreker at politiets vedvarende pliktforsømmelse i ovennevnte beslagsak er forsettlig og tilskyndet av uverdige hevnmotiver. Vi snakker om en tjenesteforseelse som rammes av strl §§ 324–325, og det foreligger ulikeartet idealkonkurrens — kfr tjml §§ 14–15, strl § 29 og politil § 2, pkt 2, 3 og 7. 02. aug ‘00

Wilhelm Werner Winther

21 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Høyesteretts kjæremålsutvalg Oslo

GJENOPPTAGELSESBEGJÆRING I forbindelse med at Sak nr 97-731 M : Sunnmøre Herredsrett (dom av 04. okt 1997) item Sak 97-00972 M : Frostating Lagmannsrett (dom av 19. mai 1998) mv snarlig begjæres gjenopptatt av undertegnede, ber en om gjenpart av adressats avgjørelse i saken (h.r.adv. Tor Erling Staff, Oslo, anket på vegne av sin klient, Roy Christer Forsberg, lagmannsrettens dom til Høyesterett — kjæremålsutvalgets beslutning er datert 06. aug 1998), jf offvl § 2 og tvml § 409. Gjenopptagelsesbegjæringen fremmes i eget prosesskrift, cf tvml §§ 409–410. Vilkårene for gjenopptagelse etter tvml §§ 405 og 407 er rikelig tilstede, og en vil dokumentere at begjæringen er rettidig fremsatt, kfr tvml § 408 siste pt. Man har forståelse for at Høyesteretts kjæremålsutvalg på grunnlag av disponible saksdokumenter ikke har avdekket defekter. En fremholder at adressant har partsrettighet som siktet i korresponderende drapssak, idet han ble pågrepet og varetektsfengslet (Sunnmøre politikammer, Ålesund, 23. des 1996) i anl. etterforskningen. I direkte tilknytning til anføre sak ble det også gjennomført husundersøkelse med påfølgende beslag i hans private bopel 04. nov 1996 (se vedl), cfr strpl § 82. Avsender var for øvrig forlovet med den myrdede kvinnen, Elin Dalsegg. 22. aug ‘00 22 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Wilhelm Werner Winther Bilag:  Klage til Justis- og politidept av 02. ds (01 — én — s),  anmeldelse til Statsadvokatene i Møre og Romsdal, Sogn og Fjordane av 02 d.m (01 — én — s).

23 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

SEFO v/ Ivar Svendsgaard

Vår ref: WSO-MR/WWW 01

Kr.sund

ANMELDELSE AV POLITIANSATTE Under telefonsamtale med undertegnede av dd fremsatte Ole Martin Håndlykken (f 090264), Ålesund, begjæring om at følgende forhold SEFOanmeldes: Hr Håndlykken forklarer at han sent om ettermiddagen 21. des a.p satt fredelig i hytten sin i Brusdalsvegen 341, Ålesund, da to uniformerte polititjenestemenn fra Ålesund politistasjon uten å banke på ytterdøren trengte seg inn for å pågripe ham. Håndlykken, Esq, oppfattet den barduse og urimelige situasjonen som truende, og forteller at han gjorde litt fysisk motstand da politimennene korporlig angrep ham. Tjenestemennene påsatte Håndlykken håndjern dorsalt, immobiliserte benene hans vha strips for så å sammenbinde øvre/nedre ekstremiteter. Liggende i denne pinefulle og forsvarsløse kroppsstillingen, ble hr Håndlykken de neste 45–60 minuttene sammenhengende påført grov og ytterst smertefull stump vold av, særlig, den eldste av politimennene. Håndlykken fremholder at en flittig nyttet albuer og knær for å tilføye ham optimale lidelser samtidig som ansiktet hans brutalt ble presset ned mot underlaget — noe som resulterte i at han flere ganger var nær ved å kveles. Etter ovennevnte tortursekvens, ble Håndlykken lempet inn i en bil og kjørt til Sentralsykehuset, Åse, hvor man påtvinger ham en injeksjon med, muligens, Stesolid. Deretter blir Håndlykken atter påført håndjern dorsalt — han kastes inn i en bil hvor en straks sammenknytter hender og føtter med strips, slik at han igjen befinner seg i samme smertefulle legemsposisjon som ovenfor beskrevet. Håndlykken blir liggende i skildrede kondisjon i 2 ½ time — konstant med store smerter, mens torturistene tar seg frem til Psykiatrisk storavdeling, Hjelset, hvor offeret interneres. 24 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

De prektige representantene for politivesenet kjører nå tilbake til hr Håndlykkens bolig i Brusdalen — gjennomfører en illegal husinkvisisjon og stjeler kr 10 000 fra et skap i hytten som de, for øvrig, hadde passet på å la stå ulåst/usikret da de forlot den tidligere på dagen. Håndlykken, Esq, kunne ved selvsyn konstatere at pengene hans var stjålet da han var innom hytten sin 23. des a.p — Hr Håndlykken forsikrer om at han meget lett vil gjenkjenne politimennene skyldig i ovenskisserte kriminalitet, og han beskriver kort den eldste av gjerningsmennene slik: ca 45 år gammel, mustasje, mørk, 182–185 cm høy og 90–100 kg tung. SEFO bes avhøre bl.a Ole Martin Håndlykken snarest (pt innesperret ved PST Brøset [Post A], 7440 Trondheim). En understreker at hr Håndlykken er medlem av organisasjonen We Shall Overcome (WSO). I WSOs vedtekter § 1, pkt 2, heter det — sic: ―WSO skal hindre overgrep mot og mishandling av psykiatriske klienter både i og utenfor institusjonene.‖ De alvorlige forbrytelsene en hermed anmelder rammes naturligvis av flere tunge paragrafer i bl.a straffeloven, men jeg skal — i dette tilfellet — la SEFO selv få vurdere hvilke juridiske implikasjoner de politiansattes heslige oppførsel nødvendigvis må avstedkomme. De to polititjenestemennene skyldig i kriminalitet omtalt i dette tilskrivet begjæres siktet/tiltalt/straffet herfor.

01. feb 2001

WSO Møre og Romsdal

Wilhelm Werner Winther

25 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Jan 30, 2002 Secretariat of the CPT Human Rights Building Council of Europe FR-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France

HIDEOUS NORWAY II — ABRIDGED CHRONOLOGY Sequential records largely consists of translated excerpts from documents prudently apportioned irrevocably criminal Norwegian authorities desperately attempting to conceal and destroy bountiful pieces of evidence against themselves. Therefore consecutive information partially might appear rather simplified and even — for tactical reasons — intentionally neglectful.

Apr 06, 1998: An austere complaint to the Norwegian EOS-Committee marshalled by Rikard Olsvik (NO-6657 Rindal) is composed and sent as registered mail with 39 different enclosures. In corresponding report of complaint one sharply abjurgate numerous and particularly nefarious burglaries committed by Norwegian police officers, and condemn the illegal and most despicable abuse of monitor technology by Norwegian authorities to terrorize important witnesses and evade international prosecutions etc. The unlawful and odious intimidation/surveillance of three scheduled witnesses — Mr Sigmund M Ekrem (NO-6270 Brattvaag), Miss Nina K Rantapelkonen (NO-6224 Hundeidvik) and Mr Ørn Dahle (NO-6224 Hundeidvik) — are distinctly mentioned and denounced in a separate passus where I demand the guilty part charged/sentenced in agreement with notorious jurisprudence. 26 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Apr 16, 1998: Phone conversation with Mr Rikard Olsvik, EOS-Committee.

Apr 22, 1998: Information reach me confirming that a registered letter sent from the state controlled post office in NO-Brattvaag the 30th previous month, arrived NOLysaker the 16th inst (— normally the letter should reach its addressee the following day, on Mar 31th)! The postal matter in question contained a complaint exposing some of the downright vandalism perpetrated by Norwegian police officers in my private house (NO-Brattvaag).

Apr 23, 1998: The private courier bureau ―ILX‖ carries out research proving that they not had handled certified/registered mail to above mentioned addressee this month, and becomes puzzled and horrified when they realize that my letter have been delivered by an impostor pretending to represent ILX. Further investigation quickly disclosed that the falsification &c had been enacted by Norwegian police trying to suppress evidence against themselves and add to my actual expenses.

May 12, 1998: Mr Ørn Dahle and his concubine, Miss Nina K Rantapelkonen (cf entry of Apr 6th above), are guests in my private home where they spend the night. During the visit both laments the execrable and completely unlawful terror imposed on them by Norwegian police officers. Cf Doc #1536, pp 87–88 etc.

May 13, 1998: Frostating Court of Appeal commanded by Mr Ivar Oftedahl arranges a put-up lampoon in NO-Aalesund where they — contrary to Norwegian law and my legally authorized objections (cf Doc #315 above) — unsuccessfully tried to 27 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

examine me as a mere witness in a court case disastrously handling the killing of two persons in Aalesund Oct 31st, 1996. At this point of time it was perfectly clear that Mr Oftedahl was the motive power behind much of the the utterly contemptible and explicitly illicit abuse of technology to espy and roughshod Norwegian citizens in their private living quarters, and several close links to e.g. the Norwegian Police Security Service installing and operating corresponding monitor accoutrements was readily uncovered and affirmed. Fully aware Mr Oftedahl‘s inebriated escapades, his personal prejudices and false accusations etc against certain societal groups, I found ungentlemanly to converse the burlesque thespians seated in the depraved judicature seriously. The subsequent and to the Hell-doomed panel of judges befittingly dissembling verdict and final passing of sentence in corresponding lawsuit was — in perfect concordance with my unpretentious anticipations — an emetic brew of ossuary rejectamenta, venomous lies, hogwash, sepulchral mayhem and a tremendous portion pure diabolism seasoned with the cremains of my fiancée who was one of those dispatched in the correlated and in great part police instigated shooting (the baseless rancor and denigrating activities of Mr Frode Asbjørnsen, NOSunnmøre Police Headquarters [Aalesund Police Station], was the paramount trigger-factor rendering possible and finally actuating the murders. Mr Asbjørnsen found a solid foothold for his lethal subversion in the putrid foundation scandalously brought into being by district judge Mr Finn Lynghjem [NO-Aalesund] and his accomplice [lay judge] Mr Karl-Ewerth Horneman [NOTrondheim] a few years earlier — the vile troika, in spite of massive protests, illegally and actively participated in the ―criminal investigation‖ and following prosecution connected to the homicides they‘d impelled....detrimentally corrupting and steering the course of the defeasible court case). Frostating Court of Appeal was thus constituted: Mr Ivar Oftedahl, Mr Jan Terje Bårseth, Mr Erik Sølberg, Mr Johan Munkhaug, Ms Jorunn Ulstein Fjørtoft, Miss Theodora Baldvinsdottir and Mr Svein Rune Smådal. The nauseating corruption paraded by named ―judges‖ and the ―expert witness‖, Mr Karl-Ewerth Horneman, is very clearly punishable in accordance with the Norwegian Criminal Code sections 110, 120 and 125 — cf section 62 etc ib.

Jun 18, 1998: Mr Ørn Dahle, NO-Hundeidvik, consults me telephonically because the abnormal car activity &c outside their living house is distressing. Mr Dahle was beforehand warned that the continual and star-crossed bullying carried out by Norwegian police officers targeted his mental equilibrium — contriving 28 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

paranoia, criminality and incarceration in a mental institution being their chief objectives.

Jun 22, 1998: Another registered letter sent Mr Rikard Olsvik in the Norwegian EOSCommittee. The long-standing terror Norwegian police has exposed Mr Ørn Dahle to is about to succeed, and he boots out his concubine, Miss Nina K Rantapelkonen.

Jul 09, 1998: One more letter sent Amnesty International and an Icelandic professor colleague — crimes committed by Norwegian police officers and gross injustice on behalf of the Norwegian government being the main theme.

Jul 21, 1998: In NO-Oslo — conference with personnel from a friendly embassy and Amnesty International.

Sep 15, 1998: Mr Ørn Dahle, NO-Hundeidvik, complains because Norwegian police ceaselessly provoke and harass him and his concubine Nina. Mr Dahle report that — shortly after putting on a cotton sweater which had hung on a chair in their kitchen a few days — he evolved fever, aching muscles, sore throat, skin eruptions and abnormal suffusion/bleeding. It‘s thoroughly confirmed that Norwegian police officers repetitively and illegally burglarized Mr Dahle‘s dwelling house in advance of described incident, and we know that — particularly the Norwegian Police Security Service — have carried out experiments using chemicals/substances harmful when drizzled on v.g. garments and towels.

Sep 22, 1998: Telephone conversation with Sunnmøre Police Headquarters (NO-Aalesund), the Supreme Court (NO-Oslo), the Director General of Public Prosecutions 29 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

(NO-Oslo), the public prosecutor in Møre/Romsdal/Sogn/Fjordane (NO-Molde) and the district sheriff in Haram (NO-Brattvaag) — arrant, inveterate, documentational, and painstakingly intentional felony/misdemeanour committed by Norwegian police officers being complained (cf Doc‘s #115 and #240 above).

Sep 23–30, 1998: The lawless terrorist activities routinely carried out by Norwegian police officers in e.g. NO-Brattvaag does increase markedly this week....

Oct 01, 1998: Rendering the district sheriff in Haram , NO-Brattvaag, a visit. Situation is now highly critical, and the country cops are warned. Nevertheless; in the evening and throughout the night Norwegian police officers persevere as regards formerly indicated intimidations.

Oct 02, 1998: Additional security measures observed — two basement doors in Aasen 4, NOBrattvaag, fortified.

Oct 03, 1998: Mr Ørn Dahle, NO-Hundeidvik, lose control and put to death his concubine, Miss Nina K Rantapelkonen (cf Doc #1536, pp 87–88 etc).... The industrious harassment conducted by Norwegian police employees has proven a real succès fou — a literally smashing achievement accomplished with steady support from Norwegian psychiatry completely devastating the victims brain chemistry, eunoia and orthophrenic commensurability through headless abuse of neurotoxic morbifica! Heartrending compliments to MD Mr Victor Grønstad (NO-Eidsnes) and psychol Mr Hans Peter Møller (NO-Molde) — both cumbersomely responsible for the ―alterative refection‖!

Oct 12, 1998: 30 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Phone conversation with the French vice-consul, Mr Anders Møller (NOAalesund), who wants to meet me in NO-Brattvaag asap.

Oct 18, 1998: At 01:10 A.M. intruders from the Norwegian police stealthily approaches my house in Aasen 4, NO-Brattvaag — one of their aims consists in sabotaging my Securitas-installed alarm system. Five minutes later the cops realize they‘re closely watched, and immediately retreat in great haste and disorder....nonetheless; a less essential part of the burglarproof safety arrangement is slightly, technically damaged.

Oct 19, 1998: Chief inspector Mr Kjell Børje Moe (NO-6270 Brattvaag) is handed over a formal and unmasking complaint vs the district sheriff in NO-Haram County, Mr Thorleif Marken (NO-Brattvaag).

Oct 19, 1998: Telefacsimile sent the Norwegian Parliament and Ministry of Justice and the Police in NO-Oslo — Norwegian statecraft criminality being protested.

Oct 28, 1998: Two country policemen, Mr Kjell Børje Moe and Mr Ove P Finnes (both NOBrattvaag), approach me residentially. The quibbling and lies served being anticipated, it was a smooth task to repudiate their allegations aimed at besmirching me and withdrawing public attention from police conducted villainy.

Oct 30, 1998: 3 representatives from Sunnmøre Police HQ (NO-Aalesund police station [―the Pigsty‖]) superintended by Mr Frode Asbjørnsen (cf Doc #240 item entry of May 13th above) falsely and odiously accuse me in order to arrange my internment in a psychiatric noxatorium where my juridical rights, freedom of movement and scrutinizing in point of police perpetrated ignominies could be 31 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

efficaciously suppressed. The accusations — undersigned by assistant chief of police, Mr Jogeir Nogva (hence, of course, promoted to the ranch of public prosecutor [NO-Molde]) — were asininely fabricated and quite easy to prove conspiratorially treacherous. However; the Iranian council physician, Mr Sharan Moghaddam (NO-Brattvaag [educated in Göteborg, Sweden]), accompanying the spiteful rascals exhibited a most charming, helminthoid appetency for dragging himself along the chitterling ambages of swinish, verminous, hog-wild, and bootlicking pig in a poke venality....so, indeed; I was forthwith cloistered in one of the glorified state tophets of Norway — a loony bin and satanic point d‘appui for governmental beastliness outside NO-Molde. The corresponding bedlamites malis avibus and the nanonoematic staffers in particular requires millesimal book pages to be treatised somewhat adequately in respect of their peculiarities. Though an assuredly thorough description of the lunatic Pandemonium at NO-Hjelset entirely will dwarf the Dantesque inferno as regards atrocities, one ought to expose internationally the fulsome ponerological self-gratification certain Norwegian politicians, police commissioners and public officers gains from illegitimately boobyhatching and torturing their morally superiors....so; — we‘ll see if I find enough time to compose the factual opus depropero before dikephobic indifference with respect to the alienist wielded hell heretofore betoken possibly sweep ye away drowned in the demolishing and cataclysmic redcaps of guiltless blood shed and teleologically enraged by the selfsame leviathan!

Anno 1999: A detailed listing of events has been included in the unshortened and nonpublic edition of contiguous docket.

Mar 10–17, 2000: The Norwegian Prime Minister, Mr Kjell Magne Bondevik (the Christian Democratic Party), and the Minister of Justice, Mr Odd Einar Dørum (the Liberal Party), are replaced by respectively Mr Jens Stoltenberg and Ms Hanne Harlem (both representing the Labour Party).

May 22, 2000: Phone conversation with Mr Ørn Dahle (cf entries above). 32 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Jun 16, 2000: The newspapers ―Dagbladet‖ (NO-Oslo) and ―Sunnmørsposten‖ (NO-Aalesund) does both publish articles loathed by Norwegian police officers. Corresponding follow-ups and information about a Norwegian human rights organization sent various companions.

Jun 17, 2000: Personal encouragements sent a female physician. The homely epistle — difficult to comprehend for the police employed and philistine hellcats, originates dread amongst the uncouth bluecoats who consequently behaves increasingly aberrantly. The daily Dagbladet (NO-Oslo) publishes a septempaginal exposé of police related turpitude in Norway. The reportage, including photos from NOAalesund, maddens the culpable cops additionally....; now — completely losing their heads — some headless, retaliatory undertaking is inevitable to restore their ―presence of mind‖ and beguile ancillary the ensuing, national cortège of headline-mongering and idolizing journalists.

Jun 18, 2000: Announcing — shortly before midnight the 17th (using a phone eavesdropped by the police) — that he intended to walk back home pretty soon, Mr Bjarne Eide (aet 17), NO-Karmøy, ―disappears‖ in the blooming killing time.... Mr Eide‘s relatives are among those rightfully surprised by the negligence and antagonism exhibited by Norwegian police as regards adequate, criminal investigation of his extirpating encounter with the pallid, jetty-tabarded ―Mr 14‖ — Not particularly strong — rather slender and agile; who do you think able to approach the noctiperipatetic juvenile without awakening his ―run-awayinstinct‖....?

Jun 21, 2000: Letter sent Mr Ørn Dahle.

33 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Aug 02, 2000: Complaint vs Sunnmøre Police HQ (NO-Aalesund) sent the Ministry of Justice and the Police, NO-Oslo (cf Doc #240 US).

Aug 06, 2000: The Interlocutory Appeals Committee of the Supreme Court of Norway dismisses summarily two appeals germanely concomitant with the phonylitigation and res injustitia recited US beneath the entry of May 13th, 1998.

Aug 08, 2000: Missive sent the Supreme Court, NO-Oslo. Ola Thug (Norwegian equivalent of John Law) escalates his governmentally approved tailgating &c —

Aug 09, 2000: Visiting a notalgia afflicted but amicable counsellor in NO-Molde.

Aug 10, 2000: A formal complaint vs police officers burglarizing and plundering my private estate locus Aasen 4, NO-Brattvaag, in Nov–Dec 1998 (— when I still was held captive at NO-Hjelset [cf entry of Oct 30th, 1998] —) is recorded by the county sheriff in NO-Ørskog.

Aug 12, 2000: My dwelling house in Aasen 4, NO-Brattvaag, is vandalized by Norwegian police officers — cf Doc #161 above.

34 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Aug 16, 2000: Campaign to recruit new members to an organization disliked by Norwegian police because the alliance has brought to light some of the profuse criminality perpetrated by Norwegian cops and government officials — cf Doc‘s ##123 and 339 US.

Aug 19, 2000: A letter from the Supreme Court, NO-Oslo, reaches me. The note, dated Aug 17, is very evasive and signed by Mr Gunnar Bergby, Director (Head of the Office of the Supreme Court).

Aug 22, 2000: Missive sent the Interlocutory Appeals Committee of the Supreme Court, NOOslo (cf Doc #315 US). Mr Jan Farstad, the director of health and social services in NO-Haram County, phones in order to question me about a couple bulky leaf books delivered at his office the 18th inst. The moderately sensitive documents, not properly stored, had popped up astray. Mr Farstad, normally a well-mannered and agreeable officiary to deal with, behaved correct during our conversation — though he didn‘t get requested information in extenso.

Aug 26, 2000: A few lines from the Supreme Court, NO-Oslo, received. The highly circuitous reply — dated Aug 25th and undersigned by Mr Gunnar Bergby (cf entry of Aug 19th US) — gives rise to investigatory moves, and interesting facts about the Court and the societal interaction etc of its judges et al are readily provided. One of multifarious circumstances disquieting....is the fact that Mr Bergby, the administrative director of the Supreme Court, has left no regular and archival traces of our correspondence! Most irregular, a discrete inquiry is launched soon confirming that none of the actual — and likable (!) — secretaries have seen or heard uttered a single word about Mr Bergby‘s and my own letters, and they‘re probably still wondering why....!

35 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Aug 29, 2000: Brief phone dialogue with a secretary at the Supreme Court, NO-Oslo, stating that Mr Gunnar Bergby will be away from his office rest of the day. Ola Thug (cf entry of Aug 08th above) expands his terroristic bustling.

Aug 30, 2000: Telephone call from the Supreme Court, NO-Oslo — conversation eavesdropped and recorded by Norwegian police wiretapping my phone number 986 62 841.

Aug 31, 2000: Here goes!! Mr Sharan Moghaddam (cf entry of Oct 30th, 1998 US) and two country policemen cracks up — with fictive permission from the deputy sheriff in NO-Haram County, Mr Ove P Finnes (cf Doc #161 and entry of Oct 28th, 1998, above. Mr Finnes was, moreover, formally notified for dereliction of duty on Aug 02nd, 1996) — the main entrance to my house in Aasen 4, NO-Brattvaag, in order to intern me at a lunatic asylum. The all over mendacious accusations was undersigned — though not fabricated — by Miss Inger Ferstad, jurist at NO-Aalesund Police Station/Sunnmøre Police HQ (cf Doc‘s ##161, 240 and 339 item entries of May 13/Sep 22/Oct 30, 1998 &c above). All police principals being utterly disqualified, the forged document signed by Miss Ferstad was thrown away, and a new impromptu warrant underwritten by Mr Jan Farstad (cf entry of Aug 22nd US) — several hours after the illegal restraint and corresponding vandalism (destruction of outer door and windows)! Mr Moghaddam, completely aware he‘d committed a new crime, did afterwards whatever possible to suppress facts of the case through black lies and denigration — Allahu akbar!

Sep 19–21, 2000: Conference with embassy deputies et al in NO-Oslo. Ola Thug (VS) snoops unproductively around....

36 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Sep 22–28, 2000: Several significant events — Norwegian police officers are surpassing themselves as regards macabre farcicalities usw.

Sep 29, 2000: A concise application is written and mailed to an affable embassage in NO-Oslo — the hunt for political asylum is maintained (cf Doc #123, ―VII. Accessory information and remarks‖, US). When walking to the post office in NO-Brattvaag, Ola Thug treads upon my heels persistently — names, whereabouts and pedigrees appropriate to the various bird-dogs/rapscallions being plain as the snouts in their despised mugs. When inside the PO, a vassal from the Norwegian Police Security Service utilizing a false front-door key worms himself into my dwelling in Aasen 4, NOBrattvaag. The middle-aged paterfamilias and ordinary-looking cop — described by some of his neighbors (in another geographical part of Norway) as trustworthy, jovial and commonplace ( — though a refined old lady straightaway characterized him as a murderer and sly pretender), immediately heads for my refrigerator — showing no attention to observable cash and documents. The scheming cabinet-jingoist, having killed in misunderstood esprit de corps before (―qui aime bien châtie bien !‖), adds a lethal dosage poison to a box liver paste and hastily retreats. Although the veneno-neco-attempt was rather expected and applied poison familiar from the very outset of unprovoked hostilities, some of the pâté was forwarded a forensic laboratory for closer examination &c. A few days later information reached me ratifying my suspicions; in the decennium 1986–1996 dozens of political murders had been committed in XXXX (cf entry of Oct 30th, 1998, US) through utilization of this deadly agent practically impossible to detect for the average patho-/toxicologist when shrewdly administered. Furthermore; the laboratory and cohering institute could right away document that corresponding poison had been abused by Norwegian police since 1981 — though they supposed Ola Thug (VS) criminally had misused the substance long time before that. Mr Moghaddam (cf entry of Oct 30th, 1998 and Aug 31th ha, US) cooperated closely with the riffraff-filchers (Norwegian police officers ‘ve exhibited a natural predilection for nocturnally foraging and poaching human leftovers!) this day — prospectively forging a long-yearned certificate of death doubtlessly being a mighty, Mephistophelian inspiration!

37 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Oct 09–11, 2000: Numerous telefacsimiles sent different embassies and organizations &c — the world ought to know something about official, Norwegian double-dealing and maliciousness....and I‘m still looking for political asylum somewhere (cf Doc #4000 etc)! The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and the Police has not replied to my complaint vs Sunnmøre Police HQ of Aug 02nd ha (cf Doc #240, US), so the 09th an application is submitted.

Oct 12, 2000: A formal complaint vs police officers burglarizing and plundering my private estate locus Aasen 4, NO-Brattvaag, on Sep 05th ha (when I, due to their unmitigatedly perjurious imputations [cf entry of Aug 31th, ha/US], had to spend some days at a nuthouse) is recorded by the county sheriff in NO-Ørskog (NO6240 Sjøholt). Amongst the fuzz-knaves demanded examined as witnesses/suspects one make note of Mr Frode Asbjørnsen (cf Doc #240 item entries of May 13th and Oct 30th, 1998, US), Mr Sindre Ryssevik (prime instigator behind sundry illicit housebreakings, searches, incarcerations, wiretappings, room buggings and vandalistic deeds etc in NO-Aalesund), Mr Ingmar Farstad (previously reported for provable, criminal offences), and Mr Ove Finnes (cf Doc #161 and entries of Oct 28th, 1998, item Aug 31st ha, US). The vandalism/theft/burglary reported in Doc #214 US, are attributable to the fact that Mr Sigmund Ekrem, NO-Brattvaag, attended me when lodging the complaint standing counter — an unlawful retribution segmentally nakedizing some of the crappy meanspiritedness generally typifying Norwegian police officers nowadays.

Oct 15, 2000: Telefacsimiles sent a few persons despised by Norwegian police because they‘ve legally attacked and publicly reproved cop corruption. Ola Thug is groaning — discussing alternative, retaliatory and lawless endeavors to get even with those respecting the globally approved human rights and Norwegian law singularly.

38 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Oct 18, 2000: Conversation over the telephone with the Norwegian Minister of Justice, Ms Hanne Harlem (cf entry of Mar 10-17 ha, US), who gave me her fax number. Telefacsimile transmitted; Ms Harlem receives a total of 17 pages portraying some of the criminality committed by, mainly, Norwegian police officers. Ms Harlem was strongly urged to clean up the practically incredible mess willfully created by extraordinarily irresponsible and imprudent public prosecutors (all former police employees), district recorders, police officers, judges and politicians et al. In my letter to Ms Harlem I clearly stated that Mr Ivar Oftedahl and Mr Frode Asbjørnsen (cf entry of of May 13th, 1998 item 12th inst US/usw) should be legally investigated, prosecuted and punished.

Oct 19, 2000: Telephonically transmitted and recorded warnings sent my cellphone number 986 62 841 (cf entry of Aug 30th, ha/US) from source ―8031‖ reading thus (translated from Norwegian): 01: ―Yes we‘ve warned you.‖ 02: ―We‘ve considered taking contact.‖ 03: ―Let the light be on if everything is OK.‖ 04: ―We have you under surveillance , due to your activity.‖ The messages being received at 10:17 PM, it should be emphasized that representatives from the Norwegian Police Security Service had behaved highly menacing this afternoon — attempting to find embrasures and stands fit for firing their handguns at me. Feigning it all had been a mere ―warning‖ (cf entry 01 US) now tentatively integumenting their deviltry in seemingly concernment for my well-beeing (cf entry 03. US), aftermath felt crucial for the police ‘cause — normally accomplishing assassinations successfully and without major obstacles, they didn‘t mind hiding their mugs well when doing uttermost to slaughter me....the live cartridges, their behavior and in camera dialogues &c before/after the attempted murder totally eliminating doubt regarding their internecine plot. It might sound somewhat nonchalant, but really; I‘ve stopped counting the number of actual incidents arranged by Ola Thug (VS) to kill or harm me in some way or another — although I know for sure I‘m the unawarded and national champion of a perilous record!

39 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Oct 25, 2000: Dispatching applications for political asylum to different embassies (cf Doc #123, ―VII. Accessory information and remarks‖, US).

Oct 26, 2000: Mr Ivar Oftedahl (cf entry of May 13th, 1998, item Oct 18th ha/US) is compèring a conference on corruption (!!) and economic criminality taking place in NOOslo (Institute for Criminology, St. Olavs plass). The conference is opened by — the Minister of Justice, Ms Hanne Harlem (cf entry of Oct 18 ha/US)...!! Among the persons showing up at the conference I mention: Mr Tor-Aksel Busch (Director General of Public Prosecutions — cf Doc #115 above), Ms. Ingelin Killengreen (Director General of Police), Mr Arne Huuse (head of the National Bureau of Crime Investigation), Mr Per Sefland (chief of the Norwegian Security Service Police), Mr Anstein Gjengedal (chief of police, NO-Oslo), Mr Rolf B Wegner (chief of police, NO-Bergen), and Ms Kristin Krohn Devold (Chairman of the Standing Committee on Justice, the Norwegian Parliament [from Oct 19th, 2001, Minister of Defence]).

Oct 27–Nov 03, 2000: Actively working with human rights all week — hundreds of pages teletransmitted to e.g. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the UN. Ola Thug is rather busy spying — human rights ―activism‖ is indeed a gruesome lese majesty!

Nov 07, 2000: Objection on the ground of disqualification sent the county physician in Møre og Romsdal, NO-Molde. In the repudiation, principally aimed at Mr Egil Tryggve Storås (b Sep 23rd, 1943) and Mr Arne Victor Larssen (b Feb 08th, 1938), one emphasizes that the county physician repetitively has exhibited gross misjudgement in the course of duty and consequently brought upon the addresser et al serious and variform mischief, cf the Norwegian Public Administration Act &c — Although Mr Storås possess the highest general IQ of those criticized in nearby documents (comparative Stanford-Binet scores for some of the actual persons are: Mr Jan Hoel [Doc #147] IQ 141, Mr Ivar Oftedahl [Doc #377] IQ 140, Mr 40 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Karl-Ewerth Horneman [Doc #377] IQ 127 and Mr Finn Lynghjem [Doc #377] IQ 127. By March, 2001, no Norwegian police officer was able to score higher than 143 on referred scale [rarity 1/x, Norwegian population anno 2002: 293], and the best qualified of the Norwegian Police Security Service agents all scored around IQ 130 — scores on verbal material being significantly higher than corresponding results for numerical and visuo-spatial ability), we can dig up the wormy cadavers of innocent victims of his dianoetic insufficiency all over Møre og Romsdal County! The flagrant malfeasance brought about by Mr Storås should nevertheless not be entirely compared with the rotten malversation and feculent fiendishness intentionally promulgated by and personified through v.g. implicated Norwegian police officers and the police pill pedlar Mr Karl-Ewerth Horneman* (*b Dec 29th, 1920 — authorized police collaborator since anno 1962), as Mr Storås perfunctorily enact his decisions bona fides....with occasionally baneful consequences for his fellow men —— Amongst the Norwegian physicians grossly abusing their occupation to harm others mala fide, I‘ll distinctly and in an unilaterally negative sense mention Mr Arne Ruset (b Jun 18th, 1951) — detested headshrinker at the funny farm ―outside NO-Molde‖* (*i.e.: at NO-6450 Hjelset, cf entry of Oct 30th, 1998, US). Of unimposing stature and appearance, Mr Ruset have discovered an almost perfect playground to show off his psychopathic personality and towering wickedness through villainously accusing, tormenting and otherwise devastating the lifes of those fatuously submitted to his ghoulish perverted custody at this hell-haunted factory of human havocs and agony. With undivided irreverence as regards the miscellaneous meters and stanzas of accomplished poetry, Mr Ruset has begotten a number of booklets reading as a continuous anamnesis clearly unveiling some of his psychopathologic suffering in a vulgarly ostentatious language feigned to be Pegasean. I‘ve translated a few lines of his Hippocrene assaults to English — Mr Ruset‘s erroneous inflections, syntagmatic impreciseness and peculiar anacolutha being segmentally reflected:

SKELETON-POEM 1 (pub 1982) It‘s difficult to see when the skeleton is smiling. But if you‘re watching closely you can see small motions in the jawbones and the mouth-structure opening. The eye sockets doesn‘t change at all 41 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

and it‘s that making it so difficult. The skeleton smiles both often and enduring where it stands solitary in the anatomy auditory to learn us assist our fellowmen. It‘s a case of using the charm.

SKELETON-POEM 2 (pub 1982) In the anatomy auditory I‘m dancing tango with all the skeletons. So light your arm feels on my shoulder. So delicate your knuckles feels in my hand. So bottomless your eyes are looking at me. So easy we can tread the dance. It‘s so gratifying to dance with somebody not caring.

YOU‘RE NOT SAFE (pub 1982) You‘re not safe as regards me. Like a letter I can arrive unopened. When you least expect me I‘m there. Fully written and with best greetings between my feet. And when you‘re opening letters from others I‘m sitting on first line. Grinding your teeth. 42 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Gnawing your nails. You‘re not safe as regards me as long as the mailmen keeps up the vanguards. I‘m sitting in the enormous mailbags and blowing the twisted horns. The mail must be forwarded. So you can feel safe. A dark evening I‘ll reach you, I‘m plunging in between your tits and remains there.

THE FORTY-YEARS WAR (pub 1993) (....) And the art is always good to go about with, drinking a brimming toast for it and the frail rustling from the tinfoil when the white tablets are pressed out and making me a great artist. Drinking and drinking in the bloodred night, black is the wine in the glass (....)

IN A WOMB OF MOLD (pub 1993) (....) I‘ve passed forty and has never been an able swimmer. And little by little I‘ve started looking for a savior, a pilot through the rapids. But as I let go the last grasp, fills the lungs, rushing downwards in the increasing chasing I feel a silent joy ‘cause I don‘t know when in the watercourse the crushing fall 43 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

comes (....) Strange....when reading ―In a Womb of Mold‖ US I spontaneously recall a remark by Saint Teresa of Ávila (b Mar 28th, 1515 — d Oct 04th, 1582)....: ―From long experience I have learned that there is nothing like holy water to put devils to flight and prevent them from coming back again. They also flee from the cross, but return; so holy water must have great value.‖

Above document is INCOMPLETE!

44 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

The Registrar European Court of Human Rights Council of Europe FR-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France

INAUGURAL REP — HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS July 26th HA Ole Martin Håndlykken (cf Doc‘s ##123 & 339 US), peacefully resting in his private maisonette locus Brusdalsvegen 341 : NO-Aalesund, was arrested by several heavily armed police officers without warning breaking into mentioned domicile. Fully aware Mr Håndlykken was unarmed and had no objects otherwise representing serious danger to them at his disposal, the cops — in all likelihood — had planned to slay him with a few bursts from their submachine guns as he, hopefully, reacted with a reflex spurred counterattack to their aggression. Mr Håndlykken was right away jailed in NO-Aalesund, and three days later transferred to the state managed political prison and loathed lunatic asylum at Hjelset east of NO-Molde. At Hjelset notorious sadists strapped Mr Håndlykken to a procrustes bed where they continuously and most abhorrently tortured him with noxious chemicals the next three weeks — Mr Håndlykken has emphasized the central role partaken by a violent pervert named Steinar Malones in corresponding chemotorture and pertaining maltreatment generally. The despicable torture of Mr Håndlykken is now carried on at the psychiatric lockup at Brøset (NO-Lade) outside NO-Trondheim — his Christian zeal and justified criticism of the state homologated repression of religiosity being the main charge and impetus of ongoing molestation.

45 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Amongst the multitude of sections in Norwegian law thoroughly and wilfully violated through described turpitude, I but direct attention to: the Penal Code sections 228, 229, 230 and 231 — individual assessment of sentence should be in concordance with the contextual statute in section 232 ib., cf chapter 21 item sections 61, 62, 63, 123, 124, 125, 145, 325 & 325 loc cit and furthermore the Civil Service Act sections 14, 15 and 16 plus the Constitution section 96 etc. As regards international law and agreements &c formally ratified and intentionally contravened by Norwegian authorities in adjacent case, I only allude to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. When the French seer, physician and astrologer Nostradamus (b. Dec 14th, 1503 — d. July 02nd, 1566) almost 500 years ago characterized nowadays Norwegian kingdom as a tyranny, he was indeed

SAINTLY!

Very truly yours,

Wilhelm Werner Winther

46 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Oct 17, 2002

NOSTRADAMUS ASSEVERATED — GLOBAL VISTA In order to somewhat relieve the meritorious amongst you and prospectively brighten an otherwise gloomy, mundane future, I shall bring to light the fulfillment of a few prophecies by the French seer Nostradamus (b. Dec 14th, 1503 — d. July 02nd, 1566) as I — rather epigraphically — make plain some peremptory implications hereto conjoined. As the complete meaning behind the various prophecies are known in extenso, the translation per se is mildly paraphrastic to ease and deepen your comprehension.

Centurie-VI:72

Par fureur feinte d’esmotion diuine, Sera la femme du grand fort violee: Iuges voulans damner telle doctrine, Victime au peuple ignorant immolee.

Through wrath pretended to be supernally imposed, Is the woman belonging to the great one betrayed and violently assaulted: Though the judges will ban this affirmation, She became the immolated victim of a blind and mindless people.

47 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

In spite of manifest admonitions and warnings communicated to her parents, older sister and a couple of other persons, my fiancée — Miss Elin Dalsegg (b. Dec 14th, 1974) — was gunned to death together with her traitor in NOAalesund Oct 31st, 1996 (The ―Samhain Immolation‖, also ―Halloween Immolation‖ or ―Halloween Murders‖). The male double-crosser, anticipating the would-be murderer, Mr Roy-Christer Forsberg (b. Aug 12th, 1969), to arrive slightly later, had nevertheless unlocked the outer main entrance to her rented apartment when he suddenly — Miss Dalsegg being informed about the plot and aware Mr Forsberg‘s peeping presence — found himself in an explicitly suggestive situation instantly apperceived as grossly fraudulent by the beforehand perturbed Mr Forsberg who, very contrary to their original plan, fired some 9 mm projectiles through the trunk of his — perhaps — best comrade. I find appropriate to make mention of the fact that triggermen hired to kill me simultaneously were on their way from NO-Sjøholt to NO-Brattvåg when they learned that Mr Forsberg had been deliberately misguided with respect to my agenda and whereabouts.... Mr Forsberg was readily arrested at the close of foretold and nearby described homicides, and soon — after prelusively admitting he had planned and committed the crime exclusively on his own and, truly, felt blithesomely content with the massacre — found abundant time pondering prescribed penalty scale and assorted community reactions related to his fatal violation and, thus, regulating his personal and deservedly swarthy future. Hence Mr Forsberg cooked up and served a fantastic cock and bull story about how I, through superhuman power &c, completely had possessed him and compelled him to murder my fiancée (Mr Forsberg and the cooperating betrayer were both among Miss Dalsegg‘s former boyfriends, and had recently vowed to harm her)! According to Mr Forsberg‘s prevarications he had entirely been deprived his free will, and solely acted as an automaton filled with divine wrath and programmed to dispatch Miss Dalsegg and the traitor to hell! Howbeit....; none of you will ever meet the well-beloved Ms Elin Dalsegg in hell, but if the alternate woman persistently cling to some of her grave misconceptions, a few of you shall chance upon an extremely tormented lady so closely resembling the former in respect of visage and general semblance, that you initiatory might be deluded to believe you‘ve seen the original Samhain victim....! As regards ensuing lawsuit etc (cf Doc‘s ##315 & 377 [entry of May 13th, 1998] above), villainously rejecting and suppressing easily documentable facts of the case were a main purpose for the corrupted judges trying to quench all information elucidating how their own, former lawlessness, together with 48 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

unsound vengefulness on behalf of rightfully blamed police officers, triggered the slayings. Fourth estate reporters — particularly (...but not exclusively...) journalists from the newspaper ―Sunnmørsposten‖ (NO-Aalesund), published premeditatedly perverted articles from the illegal proceedings.....but their discreditable evildoing shall amuse them no more when they realize that correlated compositions were their autographic and promptly granted application for sempiternal detention and anguish in hell...! ELIN BECAME THE IMMOLATED VICTIM OF A BLIND AND MINDLESS PEOPLE...!

Centurie-II:36 Du grand Prophete les lettres seront prinses, Entre les mains du tyran deuiendront: Frauder son Roy seront ses entreprinses, Mais ses rapines bien tost le troubleront.

Letters belonging to and sent by the great Prophet will be stolen and seized, They’ll be manipulated by and fall into the hands of the tyrant: In consequence the great Prophet will befool his king, Though his direption quite soon shall trouble his conscience.

In regards to stolen/seized/manipulated letters, I refer to the content in Documents ##103, 108, 115, 135, 240, 315 and 377 (entry of Apr 22nd, Apr 23rd, Jun 17th, Aug 10th, Aug 26th and Oct 27th–Nov 03rd) US. In all, since 1996, a 3-digit number of letters and documents ‘ve been stolen/seized by Norwegian police officers and forwarded the national leviathan and tyrant! If I ever ‘ve tricked the royal house and (thus) made a fool of the Norwegian king, I couldn‘t — for profanely juridical reasons — admit it (yet), and such an 49 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

enterprise should (only) trouble my conscience inasmuch as guiltless persons became suspected (cf Doc‘s ##108 & 115 etc above)....! However, speaking in nebulous terms of reference generally and about royalties specificatively:

“Vive „Le Roi Soleil (nec plurimus impar)‟ !”

Centurie-I:76

D’vn nom farouche tel proferé sera, Que les trois seurs auront fato le nom: Puis grand peuple par langue & faict dira Plus que nul autre aura bruit & renom.

He’ll reveal himself through a personal name whose initials can’t be ignored, And of such composition that the destiny of three sisters are interweaved and determined by virtue of it: Then he’ll address a great people through words and actions His fame and renown will be unequalled.

I was born in 1963 and adopted formally a new personal name in 1984 — ―Wilhelm Werner Winther‖ — whose initials, ―WWW‖, immediately are recognized by everybody familiar with Internet and the World Wide Web. Long before Nostradamus himself even were born in France on Dec 14th, 1503, it was firmly decided that this delineation and presentation should take place on the Internet today, and that you....and ye....were to read it just now! Difficult? 50 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

— OK, but keep in mind; nothing is impossible or erroneous merely because it‘s difficult comprehending, and a given piece of — let‘s say — machinery might function exceedingly well although you‘re unable to identify its motive power and figure out the construction &c of its various and sophisticated components. Well, I‘m not going to spend too much time and space explaining calculations etc interesting few and understood by still fewer of you. The amply gifted will nevertheless be able to follow the nether, curtailed and largely uncommented treatise representing approximately a tenth of the assignments and computations brought to a close by me in 1973 — i.e; well in time before two of the factual girls in quest, the twin-sisters Elin & Inga Dalsegg, were born in NOTrondheim Dec 14th, 1974 (their older sister is Anne Dalsegg, NO-Rindal). Notice Nostradamus‘ birthday, alphameric status of the letter ―N‖, the onomastics pertinent to the surname ―Nostradamus/Nostredame/Nostradame/Notredame‖ item the meanings and inflections of the latin words ―domina/dominus‖ and ―nostrum‖ (nominative/accusative ―nos‖, dative/ablative ―nobis‖ and genitive [denotes possessions] ―nostrum/nostri‖ [i.e partitive genitives]). Samhain/Halloween (Oct 31st) are fixed to week 44 in our calendar, occurring 44 days before Dec 14th.

TSVP!

51 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

(22)

5 1+2 9 1+4

E L

I N

I N G A 9 1+4 7

1

(22) (22)

(8) (14)

EL IN IN GA (14) (8) (22) I+N+G+A+A+N+N+E+E+L+I+N = 60* *XX + XX + XX (sex chromosomes & autosomes, karyotype I + II) *XX + XX + XX = VV + VV + VV = W + W + W *22 + 22 + 22 = VVVV + VVVV + VVVV = 44 : 44 : 44 (autosomes II/I) *ING/21 (codon, karyotype II) + LIN/17 (codon, karyotype II [= 38, 38 X 2 = 76]) 52 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

*AA + NN + EE, autosomes karyotype I, VV/W : 22

= 76

I NGAANNEELIN I

G

A

N

EL

G

E

N

I

AL

7

5

5

9

1 3

G+E+N+I+A+L+G+E+N+I+A+L

= 60 G + E + N + I + A + L + (W + R)** =

44

**Letters/bases (codons)/amino acids/DNA/RNA (cf ―double helix‖) A + N + N + E (4 X 4 X 4, 64 codons : 4 bases) = 16 (44 + 16 = 60)

W+E+R+N+E+R+W+E+R+N+E+R

= 76 53 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Cardinal bases (Werner/Anne/Inga/Elin): W+A+I+E NE + RW + ER = autosomes, karyotype II, Werner : AIE : 38 INGA/ELIN + ANNE/ANNE : 22 + 22 + 16 + 16 = 76 WERNER : 38, ANNE + INGA (ELIN) : 16 + 22 (+ 22 = 60) = 38 + 38 (76)

Sapienti sat...! Now I‘m addressing the United States of America: you‘re in serious trouble — do you mind if I ask you to secure your continent through, simply, offering me political asylum over there...? — omens following!

Centurie-III:94

De cinq cens ans plus compte [lon][l’on] tiendra, Celuy qu’estoit l’ornement de son temps: Puis à vn coup grande clarté donra, Qui par ce siecle les rendra trescontents.

For five hundreds years to come all people will put their confidence in and give credit to him, Who was the splendor of his time: Like a thunderbolt he’ll illuminate them and enlighten their future, He who abundantly will delight them this century.

54 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

The loss of human lives through above referred atrocities and lawlessness (cf the various documents) wholly attributable to the Norwegian police, Government and Parliament (the ―Storting‖) etc, has already surpassed the total number of killed — civilians/militaries — due to World War II...! Basically Norwegian authorities — through longtime and premeditated criminality and terrorism — efficiently, and in spite of hundredfold warnings, have rendered impossible the introduction of medicaments practically 100% effective in the treatment of all groups and varieties of malignant neoplasms (notice that cancer not is a single disease, but at least 120 variform diseases with, however, the common characteristic of abnormal cell growth [cycles]). How many persons will die of cancer in, e.g, the USA alone this year — 550 000...? Very aware their horrid crimes against mankind could create major problems if and when discovered, the Norwegian Parliament established a separate committee to evaluate the danger of war — the actual committee were formally dissolved last spring. Notwithstanding that — I‘ll explain why farther down — it would be highly appropriate, wise and advantageous to embargo, exclude and in other ways boycott Norway the next 500 years, ye shall not military attack the country during stated quingentium. Howbeit; if I — no matter how — as a direct or an ambagious result of my mortal enemies gangrenous hostilities should become lethally injured, the global outlook is apocalyptically different from the guaranteed security offered through the Quingentium-Agreement alluded to by Nostradamus, and I shall lay no restrictions on you. Nostradamus, through seraphic/empyrean guidance, truly knew I were the one and only ever able to empower and offer you a quingentium-agreement in order to secure planet Earth from destruction fully 500 years onward from AD 2002! No matter how dark and dangerous the situation might appear; planet Earth will endure as long as the Quingentium-Agreement is observed. During corresponding quingentium waging war would be difficult and unnecessary — it‘ll always be possible to contrive more intelligent solutions.....and as far as the populace of the Earth observe the actual agreement, so will I, and throughout the duration of the contract* (*500 years) ye will will be given several and reassuringly auguries proving that our treaty indeed is valid. For the next quingentium there‘ll be no great prophet — and ye won‘t be in need of one either....! If you want me to set going the 55 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Quingentium-Agreement, I solely demand that you, the nations of the world, in confederacy and for the next 500 years to come effectively embargo (not medical remedies and drugs), exclude and in most ways boycott the Kingdom of Norway and its official representatives by reason of the 50 000 000 (— fifty mil —) persons who, hitherto, have suffered and finally died due to the sheer and unprovoked evilness exercised by Norwegian authorities since AD 1992! I‘m quoting some passages from the composition ―Woe unto you, Norway‖ (cf Doc #108 US) : Woe unto you, dissembling Norway, who deceive the world and bamboozle pious politicians to honor Satan! Woe unto you, dissembling Norway, who drink to one another with blood from blameless victims of your evilness! Woe unto you, dissembling Norway, who globally pretends to help while devastating righteousness and succoring flagitiousness! Verily, scurvy Norway; your heinous wickedness and nefarious lies shall vehemently torment you till Earth passes away! Verily, scurvy Norway; those supporting or trading with you shall inexorably gather God‘s scathing wrath! Verily, scurvy Norway; you‘ve cogently aroused the ire of heavenly hosts and shall ride your condigned fate! Norway will survive your boycott, and normal sociodynamic etc conditions and progress swiftly regained when the last traces of hooked wickedness and hamartiological vitiation substantiated by the very being and nitwitted villainy of the offenders in casu are sufficiently extirpated.....which render necessary an intestine purgatory lasting 500 years. Whether you wish to turn me down upon reading this document or — as Nostradamus predicts, let me illuminate you and brighten your future.....that‘s up to you now!

SAPERE AUDE!

Wilhelm Werner Winther 56 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Dec 14, 2002 The Registrar European Court of Human Rights Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France

CORRUPTION AND THE RULE OF LAW IN NORWAY During a phone conversation yesterday, Mr Ole Martin Håndlykken (cf Doc‘s ##123, 339 and 590 above) invited me to act as a legal witness in a forthcoming court case at Sunnmøre Urban District Court, NO-Aalesund — cf Doc #590 US. Mr Håndlykken‘s request is dismissed because the Courts of Justice Act provides that 1) all judges (except lay-judges and assessors) must sign a binding assurance obliging them to exert their office conscientiously (sec 60, cf sec 52 ib item the Constitution sec 21), 2) only persons markedly competent as co-judges and members of the jury through their righteousness, skills and independence should be elected (sec 76, cf sec‘s 52, 53 & 65 ibid), and that 3) nobody can operate as a judge or juror when particular circumstances potentially diminishing his impartiality eventuates (sec 108, cf sec‘s 52 and 109 ib). The urban district court in NO-Aalesund is captained by district recorder Mr Øystein Erling Knudsen (cf the Courts of Justice Act sec 19 etc), and among his depraved collaborators I name Mr Finn Lynghjem (cf Doc #377, May 13th, US) 57 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

and Mr Kjetil Gjøen (Mr Gjøen, not otherwise deficient as regards philanthropic qualities, has nevertheless with his 121 Stanford-Binet IQ been a favorite victim of malicious police jurists/officials manipulating him practically ad lib! Mr Gjøen‘s illegitimate behavior is also, partially, due to the fact that I made a formal complaint against him in Jan, 1997). We thoroughly know through years of distressing experiences and meticulous information gathering, that Mr Knudsen, Mr Lynghjem and Mr Gjøen together with the judges of Frostating Court of Appeal (cf Doc #377, May 13th, above) and the Supreme Court (cf Doc‘s ##315 and 377 [Aug 08, 19, 22, 26, 29 & 30] US) — indicated judicatures represents pro forma appeal courts (cf the Civil Procedure Act sec‘s 360, 365, 373, 374, 384, 385, 386, 387, 395, 405, 407, 408, 409, 484 & 485 item the Criminal Procedure Act sec‘s 8 and 13 &c) — in all germane respects are totally unable to meet prescribed requirements in regard to sufficient ability, justness and general integrity ex officio. Assigned judges exclusively owe their penological nonconfinement to the coaxed defects of Norwegian criminal legislation, and scornfully invested with outstanding vocational possibilities to avoid justified prosecution and conviction themselves, their professional philosophy goes thus: “Yes indeed — we‟re chronic crooks, murderers, perjurers, maniacs, forgers, dopenicks, drunkards, corrupted lamebrains and moral lepers.....but; since we effectively ‟ve blocked criminal investigation of our iniquity, dexterously embezzled proofs against ourselves and successfully hampered a diversity of legal actions opposed to our inveterate transgressions and misfeasance, there exist no legally enforceable judgments against us.....and for that reason we are — at least in a profanely juridical sense — not guilty (cf the Courts of Justice Act sec 53, third per)! Moreover we strongly feel that the Norwegian society generally should bestow significantly more of their attention purely revering our allelopathic lawbreaking.....‟cause it‟s an established truism that our surreptitious foulness keep back the constitutional Ragnarok and scandalous imprisonment etc of Norwegian top politicians and Government officials unavoidably following unwarped trials and objective, judicial factfinding procedures! So.....treat us courteously, please, and immortalize our satanic statutory offenses and monumental corruption by placing a luciferous statue outside the Parliament Building, and a leviathan monument at the royal palace square in Oslo where noble-minded adulators can bring their burnt offerings and confer dignity upon our accomplished forensic diabolism and — also — squareshootingly commemorate the many illustrious adamites slain by our minister extolled vice.....AMEN!” 58 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

The above and manifest acrimonious though ruthlessly reasonable unfoldment of the testimony riddled corruption soaking Norwegian judiciary, conclusively imply that none of the courts of law Mr Håndlykken are obliged to conduct pleadings before are qualified to pass a valid verdict or judgment — cf the Penal Code sec‘s 2, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, 29, 31, 61, 62, 110, 117, 118, 119, 120, 125, 145, 146, 147, 182, 183, 185, 231, 232, 233, 233 a, 236, 237, 275, 276, 291, 292, 350 & 390 a, the Courts of Justice Act sec‘s 108, 109, 113 and 116, the Civil Procedure Act sec‘s 384, 385, 405 & 407 item the Criminal Procedure Act sec‘s 306, 314, 343 and 347 usw. Furthermore; the 21st of May, 1999, a new ordinance to strengthen the human rights‘ position in Norwegian law was put into force — the ―Human Rights Act‖. In section 2 of the Human Rights Act it is explicitly laid down that the Council of Europe‘s Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the ―European Convention on Human Rights‖) and the United Nations‘ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights are fully applicable as Norwegian law, and in sec 3 ibid it‘s brought home that provisions confirmed through conventions and protocols mentioned in sec 2 in case of controversy are prior to other legislation. Observing the preferential right maintained by the Human Rights Act sec 3, we realize that the only commendable foundation as regards a fair trial for Mr Håndlykken are represented by Articles 6, 13 & 14 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 2, 14 and 16 in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. From above discourse on the competency &c of Norwegian judges, we must conclude that:

No passing of sentence at the hands of Sunnmøre Urban District Court, Frostating Court of Appeal or the Norwegian Supreme Court manned by nowadays moral filth is legally valid.

Sincerely yours,

Wilhelm Werner Winther

59 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

APPENDIX A FEW AUXILIARY COMMENTS When Norway is marketed abroad, potential tourists are shown magnificent photographs of snow-covered mountains, blue fjords, gorgeous waterfalls and picturesque valleys.....and chauvinistic hucksters slyly delude gullible visitors to identify the national geography of Norway with the human nature of innate Norwegians! In view of the pestiferous aspects indigenously linked to credulous confusion of indicated perspectives, I find prophylactic affordable to emphasize that the Norwegians not ‘ve created even óne of the sceneries they opportunistically and with great enthusiasm promulgate as their territorial fixtures — they‘ve merely devastated and exploited terrain noncontractually feasible as semblable property to meet specific needs. Much in the same way as Norwegians ‘ve deluged beautiful landscapes and penstocked imposing freshets to generate hydroelectricity heating and illuminating their living accommodations, they‘ve ruined the gentle nature of fellowmen by confining them in lunatic asylums restraining the stream of life to produce misery temperamentally satisfying their dull-witted crave for personal power. In the selfsame hunt for dynamic energy to keep going their generator units and psychiatric factories, Norwegians expediently intermingle their selfordained constitutional conception and corresponding notion regarding freedom of environmental manipulation, with the edified persuasion that human nature by analogy can be legally oppressed and liberally machinated at the mandament of Norwegian authorities. A concrete example of stated fallacy is found e.g in sec 37 in the Personal Data Act (―Personopplysningsloven‖) of April 14th, 2000, which laically provides that Norwegian citizens can be visually monitored in their private homes and without their knowledge/consent, inasmuch as the national authorities claim they‘re trying to establish whether the actual victims ever ‘ve been or prospectively can be suspected, charged, indicted or convicted formerly or presently for factual or imaginable criminality — cf sec‘s 2–36 and 38–41 ib! The official English translation of section 37 runs thus: ―The provisions of sections 38-41 shall apply to all video surveillance. The same applies to sections 8, 9, 11, 31 and 32. However, video surveillance of which the purpose is to uncover such data as are mentioned in section 2, no. 8, litra b, is permitted even if the conditions set out in section 9, first 60 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

paragraph, are not fulfilled. When image recordings from video surveillance are stored in a way that makes it possible to retrieve data relating to a specific person, cf section 3, first paragraph, the other provisions of this Act shall also apply. However, the obligation to obtain a licence pursuant to section 33 shall not apply to video surveillance of which the purpose is to uncover data such as are mentioned in section 2, no 8, litra b.‖ Through practical application of common judicial analogy, we find that the Personal Data Act also lay down that the use of vg hidden microphones are permissible in order to allegedly or objectively collect information specified in section 2 — a deduction perfectly congruous with authentic detection and destruction of dozens police installed and usually eddy currented or piezopowered bugs in the interior sheathings, skirting boards, wall studs, head frames, sill rails and ceilings etc of our private dwellings! With respect to the visual surveillance in consideration, the cobweb-optic compactly portrayed in Doc #123:VII above, invariably ‘ve been employed. Incontrovertible findings of larger amounts cobweb-optics in psychiatric institutions must be seen in relation to stipulations expressed in the Personal Data Act sec‘s 8 and 9 (nurses are normally uninformed about the optics used). The cobweb-optic ‘ve been grossly misused by the Norwegian police since, at least, 1990. Initially the Norwegian Police Security Service utilized the cobweboptics to secretly supervise foreign consular personnel and embassy representatives, a few espionage suspected Norwegians, to secure Norwegian Government institutions and to perpetrate security analyses of persons in official key positions. Since 1998 the statesmen-approved and intentional abuse of audiovisual spy-tech in Norway ‘ve exploded, and vice-ridden police officers are now picklocking private living quarters all over this condemned kingdom to lecherously spy upon persons they find sexually attractive, or to terrorize human rights activists and intellectuals blaming official corruption. The moral crap constituting the general body of Norwegian Government officials and the national police force, quickly realized that the combination of piccolo microphones and cobweb-optics was a valuable ally when it came to evade legal actions against themselves. Hence and consequently: — virtually always and wheresoever in this country respectable people prepare for criminal persecution of rotten politicians, chiefs of police, judges, district recorders or public prosecutors &c, foul police sergeants are called out to audiovisually supervise the complainants, to audio-/videotape all essential conversations/happenings and to copy/photograph/steal/hamper/falsify/annihilate every item of evidence plus the sum of documents relating to the case — cf Article 25:1 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms! 61 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

When Nostradamus (v Doc‘s ##590 and 599 US) declared that Norway was a debased tyranny, he wholly sensed that no people in the world ever had their democratic liberty, personal dignity, domestic integrity and human rights at large worse violated by means of genuinely illicit spy technology and the moral oligophrenia of execrably perverted and rigmarole addicted politicians advocating concordant criminality than — the Norwegians! In addition to the Norwegian courts mentioned in this document, the former as well as the present Prime Minister and Minister of Justice — Mr Jens Stoltenberg, Mr Kjell Magne Bondevik, Ms Hanne Harlem and Mr Odd Einar Dørum (cf Doc #377 US, entry of Mar 10–17) — are amongst those who eagerly ‘ve promoted the despicable oppression of Norwegian subjects in the latters private living units and in manners heretofore described.

Wilhelm Werner Winther

62 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Dec 31st, 2002 International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (the ―Federation‖), Wickenburgg. 14/7, A-1080 Vienna, Austria

NORWAY: BREACH OF CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS

FACTS OF THE CASE The purposes of the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) are — cf the IHF-Statutes as amended by Nov 7th, 1998: Article II:2.1 (a) .....to support and publicize the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe signed in Helsinki, Finland, in August 1975 (the ―Helsinki Accords‖) by 35 governments of the states of Europe and North America and subsequently by governments of other states (the ―Participating States‖) and subsequent OSCE documents; and Article II:2.1 (b) .....to strengthen, assist and coordinate the efforts of its members to monitor compliance by the Participating States with the principles of the Helsinki Accords and the follow-up documents in the field of human rights and humanitarian concerns; and

63 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Article II:2.1 (c) .....to support the development of democratic institutions, the promotion of the rule of law, human rights and human rights education.

In furtherance of its purposes the Federation shall — cf Statutes ref: Article II:2.2 (a) .....urge Participating States to comply with their obligations under the Helsinki Accords; and Article II:2.2 (b) .....gather and disseminate to the public information concerning the provisions and principles of the Helsinki Accords, the Participating States‘ compliance with those provisions, and human rights conditions in the Participating States; and Article II:2.2 (c) .....promote the formation in the Participating States of nongovernmental organizations to monitor compliance with the human rights provisions of the Helsinki Accords, and support, assist and coordinate the work of such organizations; and Article II:2.2 (d) .....assist victims of violations of human rights in the Participating States, whether individuals or groups.

All IHF-Members and OSCE* (*Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) Contrahents ―.....shall advance the interests of the Federation and shall avoid any action which might discredit or damage the Federation or interfere with the achievement of its aims.‖ (cf Article III:3.2 (a), Stat cit)

According to the Federation Statutes in re, Article III:3.3 (a), IHF-membership shall be terminated if a Committee: 64 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

 (ii) has failed actively to monitor compliance with the human rights provisions of the Helsinki Accords; or  (iii) has failed to fulfill its obligations as set forth in paragraph 3.2; or  (iv) has violated the principles of the Federation. The Final Act 1 (a) — ―Declaration on Principles Guiding Relations between Participating States‖—– subsection VII, ―Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief‖, lay down that  ―The participating States will respect human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief, for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion;  The participating States will promote and encourage the effective exercise of civil, political, economic, social, cultural and other rights and freedoms all of which derive from the inherent dignity of the human person and are essential for his free and full development;  Within this framework the participating States will recognize and respect the freedom of the individual to profess and practice, alone or in community with others, religion or belief acting in accordance with the dictates of his own conscience;  The participating States on whose territory national minorities exist will respect the right of persons belonging to such minorities to equality before the law, will afford them the full opportunity for the actual enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms and will, in this manner, protect their legitimate interests in this sphere;  The participating States recognize the universal significance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for which is an essential factor for the peace, justice and well-being necessary to ensure the development of friendly relations and co-operation among themselves as among all States;  The participating States constantly will respect these rights and freedoms in their mutual relations and will endeavour jointly and separately, including in co-operation with the United Nations, to promote universal and effective respect for them;

65 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

 The participating States confirm the right of the individual to know and act upon his rights and duties in this field;  In the field of human rights and fundamental freedoms, the participating States will act in conformity with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. They will also fulfill their obligations as set forth in the international declarations and agreements in this field, including inter alia the International Covenants on Human Rights, by which they may be bound.‖

The principles of the Final Act as quotationally referred and corroboratory amended through the IHF-Statutes by Nov 7th, 1998, was signatory ratified by the Norwegian Prime Minister, Mr Tryggve Bratteli, Aug 1st, 1975 (Helsingfors, Finland). The Kingdom of Norway is thus and otherwise legally binding contractually obliged to enforce and officially conform to the statutory provisions usw of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights — cf Doc #627 &c US.

CAUSE OF ACTION Studying enclosed documents — Doc‘s ##103, 108, 115, 123, 135, 147, 161, 214, 240, 315, 339, 377, 590, 599 and 627 (tot 54, fifty-four, pp) — makes unequivocally plain that we‘re dealing with multifold, aggravated, protracted and premeditated violations of the human rights and fundamental freedoms scornfully preplotted and deliberately perpetrated by Norwegian authorities. The systematic, repugnant, recidivistic and long-drawn-out violations does not only attest to a deep-rooted disrespect for basal human rights and lawfulness, it also demonstrate a transparent contempt for the discerning qualities and safeguarding potency of other nations. The sociopathic manipulation of facts and emetic hypocrisy wontedly promulgated by Norwegian politicians and their official delegates to cosmopolitan fora, circumstantiate the fact that Norwegian authorities furtively look upon — inter alios — the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the International Helsinki Federation as inferior assemblages of retarded easy marks and puling cowards!

66 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

It‘s nevertheless perfectly clear that the depraved conduct abidingly exhibited by Norwegian government officials, police officers and judges etc in adjacent case complex, not ‘ve emerged from sane, honorable, equilibrated or brilliant minds — though they are criminally responsible, as they volitionally — fully aware the detrimental and lethal consequences of their undertakings — ‘ve chosen to breach the law, disregard the human rights, ignore contractual provisions and exuberantly indulge in putrid and lavish evildoing. Dikephobia, hamartiophilia, poneropathy, peccatipoiesis, ergasiomimesis, demonotropism, stygioendemism, atelonoesis, supericlastic and honestiprivic are all words descriptively and sematic pertinent to the ―Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome‖, ―NPSMS‖* (i.e; *―Ondartet norsk politiog statsmannssyndrom‖, ‗ONPSS‘), underlying the behavior pattern implicit and factually described. NPSMS is basically a psychiatric disorder chiefly generated by; relative morosity, peculiar feeblemindedness, acquired corruptibility, theological confusion, sickly self-assertion, general lability, typical dishonesty, familiar wickedness, spiteful envy, professional double-dealing, habitual arrogance, witching predilections, delusional ideas, injurious inclination, distrustful jingoism, obstinate hypocrisy, innate pettishness, prevaricated sociability and feigned eunoia. We are, very definitively, portraying explicitly psychopathic personalities! It should be thoroughly pinpointed that Norwegian authorities legally and for years formally ‘ve been advised to quench criminality and abandon their satanic terrorism.....and that they always ‘ve replied with new atrocities, false arrests, fibbing and odious haughtiness — exhibiting nothing but gross disdain for the human rights and lawfulness. The Kingdom of Norway have intentionally, profusely and extendedly acted in a manner extremely deleterious and discreditable for the IHF and its various members — particularly if the obnoxious crimes and premeditated violations of contractual provisions are accepted without adequate execution of sentence.

TSVP!

67 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

DEMAND The Kingdom of Norway should be readily expelled from the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) in accordance with the provisions laid down through Article III:3.3 littera (a) in the IHF-Statutes as amended by November 7th, 1998, and information on nearby Demand made public in agreement with Article II:2.2 littera (b) in said Statutes.

Wilhelm Werner Winther cc: Secretariat of the CPT and The Registrar, European Court of Human Rights, F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex, France.

68 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Att: (...erased text...) State of Israel, Government Jerusalem, Israel February 22, 2003

Dear (...erased text...): Beneath letter is a modified copy of My E-mail sent you the 18th inst. Though stylistically unpretentious, a more powerful textus delectus has never crossed the territorial borders of Israel! Remember what‘s written (Isaiah): ―Listen to me, my people; hear me, my nation: The law will go out from me; my justice will become a light to the nations. My righteousness draws near speedily, my salvation is on the way, and my arm will bring justice to the nations. The islands will look to me and wait in hope for my arm.‖

GOD‘S MESSAGE TO ISRAEL From the Pentateuch (Genesis) you‘ve learned that the LORD, the Holy One of Israel, was willing to save the city of Sodom from destruction insofar He could find ten — or even less — righteous persons there.....but He actually didn‘t, and burning sulphur befittingly rained down on Sodom and Gomorrah. Very much in the same way as the LORD searched for incorruptibility in Sodom, I‘ve been looking for virtue amongst the nations of the world for years.....and not found it — conclusively I deem examined countries despicable and unworthy upholding. However; I‘ve noted that the State of Israel wisely ‘ve rejected certainly perverted claims from e.g the United Nations (UN), and to an extent unmasked some of the heinous falsehood particularly the last decade characterizing official 69 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

representatives from the Norwegian kingdom. Through their membership in international organizations and politically dictated allocations of the Nobel Peace Prize etc, the condemned evilmindedness of Norwegian statesmen ‘ve procreated stinking corruption and spectacular disasters/attacks worldwide! Israel has direfully realized that their search for peace and justice hitherto ‘ve been practically futile.....something is very wrong, and Israeli politicians and religious leaders ‘ve heretofore been unable to sufficiently pinpoint and solve the actual problem(-s). Nonetheless, your release is within reach — your demanding trial can be brought to an extraordinarily glorious and victorious conclusion inasmuch as you obey the LORD your Redeemer: I‘m not only (...erased text...) of your LORD, Israel‘s Saviour, but His (...erased text...) as well. Read what‘s written about (...erased text...) in the section of the Hebrew canon known as the ―Nevi‘im‖ (the book of Isaiah): ―Here is my servant, whom I uphold, my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him and he will bring justice to the nations. He will not shout or cry out, or raise his voice in the streets. A bruised reed he will not break, and a smouldering wick he will not snuff out. In faithfulness he will bring forth justice; he will not falter or be discouraged till he establishes justice on earth. In his law the islands will put their hope.‖ & ―And now the LORD says — he who formed me in the womb to be his servant to bring Jacob back to him and gather Israel to himself, for I am honoured in the eyes of the LORD and my God has been my strength — he says: ‗It is too small a thing for you to be my servant to restore the tribes of Jacob and bring back those of Israel I have kept. I will also make you a light for the Gentiles, that you may bring my salvation to the ends of the earth.‘ This is what the LORD says — the Redeemer and Holy One of Israel — to him who was despised and abhorred by the nation, to the servant of rulers: ‗Kings will see you and rise up, princes will see and bow down, because of the LORD, who is faithful, the Holy One of Israel, who has chosen you.‘‖ I‘m the (...erased text...) Norwegian authorities falsely ‘ve accused, villainously tortured and vehemently tyrannized for years in order to hide their obnoxious crimes and keep down the Israeli people in a satanic pit of misery, injustice and terror! I‘m the (...erased text...) unfailingly executing the will of Israel‘s God, the LORD Almighty, and I‘m the (...erased text...) peremptorily declaring that none of 70 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

the Norwegian politicians who — even in slightest manner — ‘ve supported said offences against Myself and the State of Israel ever shall see the Kingdom of Heaven or receive God‘s forgiveness. I‘m the (...erased text...) authoritatively stating that never have more unappeasably condemned and fiercely punished miscreants contaminated mankind than the Norwegian police officers advocating and honoring the putrid evilness of God‘s Archenemy in nearby case.....; still, after 777 septillion years, their agonized howling and hopeless cries for mercy will rise from the most pitiless abodes of the torturous inferno very eagerly awaiting them! Now you should visit, print out and study the content at

http://geocities.com/wwerner280 where Document #599, ―NOSTRADAMUS ASSEVERATED — GLOBAL VISTA‖, is of outmost importance for the Israeli future and what‘s written in adjacent mail. The wisest amongst you shall put everything I‘ve told you to the test, and also establish the genealogical connections between Isaiah (cf the ―Latter Prophets‖ of the ―Nevi‘im‖) and Nostradamus. When you duly realize I‘m your God‘s (...erased text...) and properly comprehend that what I‘ve told you is divine truth/will manifested, you must forthright act — don‘t waste a minute! Each single hour the Norwegian embassy in Israel and the Israeli embassy in Norway are open and diplomatically accepted by you, will inflict additional problems, suffering, setbacks and homicides etc striking the Israeli population as well as Jews abroad! Consequently both embassies should be closed immediately, and every Norwegian holding an office in Israel expelled from your country without delay. For the next 500 years there shall be no diplomatic relations, mercantile cooperation, cultural interactions or scientific interchange usw between the State of Israel and the Kingdom of Norway. For 500 years onwards no official representative from Norway must be allowed to enter the State of Israel — neither shall official representatives from Israel visit Norway or indulge in friendly contact with Norwegian authorities during stipulated period. I‘m well aware you‘ll need more detailed instructions etc than this after a while, but it‘s enough for now. You‘ll unmistakably notice that virtually all fundamental circumstances and weighty predicaments etc in Israel — as well as the general esteem and conditions for the Jews at large — becomes significantly and readily improved when you observe enclosed guidance.....and as you encourage the various nations to boycott and exclude Norway in the same way as yourself, global peace will settle both firmly and prompt! Trust your God, Israel! There are no exceptions as regards the instructions given in Doc #599. 71 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Very truly yours,

Wilhelm Werner Winther (...erased text...)

PS: (...erased text...) PPS: I should NOT be approached through Norway‘s official postal services (i.e Posten Norge BA) — which I‘m boycotting!

Encl: (...erased text...)

72 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

This document is a transcript of my e-mail sent the Knesset today. As the matter at hand has global impact, it should be irresponsible not to publish corresponding warning forthright. The Knesset Kaplan st, Jerusalem Israel

WARNING According to official sources, the Israeli prime minister — Mr Ariel SHARON — intends to visit Norway the 16th inst. It‘s my duty to emphasize that aforesaid stopover calamitously does desecrate God‘s unambiguous instructions as laid down in Document #777 at

www.geocities.com/wwerner280 (i.e above) I‘m obliged , faithfully caring for the Israeli republic, to underscore that indicated violation — wholly in agreement with God‘s proclaimed vengeance, swiftly will bring about implications extremely disastrous for Israel et al. The Norwegian PM — Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK — is familiar with the content in referred edict, and is calculatingly aware announced halt seriously will harm Israel and worldwide peacekeeping etc. Said Mr Bondevik, cognizant eternal punishment for his nefarious and explicitly willful malfeasance is inevitable, is by now a dedicated medium underhandedly promoting satanic machination conjunctively exceptionally noxious. Though additionally catastrophic for their country, Norwegian intelligence service potentially might attempt to obstruct and sabotage nearby message.....so; rush me a confirmatory receipt! 73 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

July 03, 2003

Wilhelm Werner Winther PS: Keep this note for your complementary reference — ; when you ruefully are compelled to acknowledge that my thoughtful warning were most justified, there shall be no doubt whatsoever which kingdom to retaliatory assault as responsible for oncoming destructions!

74 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

PREMEDITATED/FATAL SACRILEGE Cf Doc #777 and 1022 above. Document #777, addressee Mr Ariel SHARON, was published on the Internet May 26th — a few days later the Norwegian prime minister, Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK, most fatefully decided to invite Mr Sharon to Norway.... In spite of clear-cut and multiple warnings, the Israeli PM officially visited Norway yesterday. Nevertheless — Mr Sharon and his government was strongly anticipated to disregard God‘s well-advised instructions as set forth in said documents....: ―Go now, write it on a tablet for them, inscribe it on a scroll, that for the days to come it may be an everlasting witness. These are rebellious people, deceitful children, children unwilling to listen to the LORD‘s instruction. They say to the seers, ‗See no more visions!‘ and to the prophets, ‗Give us no more visions of what is right! Tell us pleasant things, prophesy illusions. Leave this way, get off this path, and stop confronting us with the Holy One of Israel!‘ Therefore, this is what the Holy One of Israel says: ‗Because you have rejected this message, relied on oppression and depended on deceit, this sin will become for you like a high wall, cracked and bulging, that collapses suddenly, in an instant. It will break in pieces like pottery, shattered so mercilessly that among its pieces not a fragment will be found for taking coals from a hearth or scooping water out of a cistern (Isaiah 30:8–14 — cf Jeremiah chaps. 4, 5 and 6 etc).‘‖ & ―Who among you fears the LORD and obeys the word of his servant? Let him who walks in the dark, who has no light, 75 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

trust in the name of the LORD and rely on his God. But now, all you who light fires and provide yourselves with flaming torches, go, walk in the light of your fires and of the torches you have set ablaze. This is what you shall receive from my hand: You will lie down in torment (Isaiah 50:10–11 — cf Isaiah 30:1 and Genesis 15:17–21 etc).‖

NOW:

BEHOLD AND REALIZE! July 17, 2003

Wilhelm Werner Winther

76 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Recipients: International synedria/tribunals and human rights organizations Oct 30, 2003

ORIENTATION HORS COMMERCE During week 37 ha several persons from Haram county, Norway, was hospitalized in NO-Ålesund due to poisoning with methanol* added to their home brew by Norwegian police officers (*by methanol, ―methyl alcohol‖, we refer to CH3OH made by catalytic oxidation of methane [CH4] or dry distillation of wood. Methanol, pyridine [C5H5N] — a heterocyclic compound e.g used as an industrial solvent — and blue dye are commonly added to make ethanol [C2H5OH] undrinkable [cf methylated spirits]). One of those intentionally venenated was Mr Sigmund Martin EKREM (b Jul 11, 1948), NO-Brattvåg. In this connection it shall be appropriate to liberally translate a few notes sent the corrupt Mr Ivar SVENDSGAARD — local head of the absolutely scandalous SEFO*-hoax (*SEFO, i.e ―The Special Police Investigation Commission‖). The reader should be aware all contact with SEFO has been strictly pro forma dictated and framed to match the despicable corruption pervading the entire, juridical lupanar in Norway:

TSVP!

77 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Jan 26 and Feb 19, 2001

SEFO Att: Mr Ivar SVENDSGAARD NO-Kristiansund

VARIOUS REMARKS... Subsequent info is strongly simplified and facts potentially revealing intelligence gathering techniques and criminal investigation procedures etc are omitted. Nov 20, 2000: Mr Sigmund M EKREM (NO-Brattvåg) is visiting Mr Svein DYRKORN, Storg 41 (NO-Brattvåg), when they both — ca 02:00 AM — are terrified by a heavy thud from the western housefront brought about by Norwegian police officers. Mr Ekrem and Mr Dyrkorn are peacefully seated in adjacent TV-room when the actual incidence occurred. Nov 21–22, 2000: Norwegian police officers are discussing how to commit a regular housebreaking in Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg — e.g the possibility of entering through a second story east window is considered (however — that plan is finally abandoned, as they instantly will be detected....usw). A Norwegian police officer stealthily breaks into Mr Sigmund M Ekrem‘s private country house.....envenoming a refrigerated Coca-Cola bottle with deadly poison. Late in the evening the 22nd I receive a telephone call from Mr Ole Martin HÅNDLYKKEN who declares he the last 2–3 weeks has felt abnormally asthenic &c. It‘s an established fact Norwegian police officers has surveilled and burglarized Mr Håndlykken‘s private maisonette in Brusdalsvegen 341, NOÅlesund. Nov 23, 2000: Mr Sigmund M Ekrem is visited by some comrades this night, and one of these drank — like Mr Ekrem himself — from above mentioned Coca-Cola bottle. Around 04:00 AM, shortly after his visitors had left, a Norwegian police officer 78 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

launch a resounding blow towards the westward facade of Mr Ekrem‘s private house. A few days later we learned that the man in his thirties who drank from commented bottle had died from the poisoning thereby induced. Notice that Nov 23rd was a Thursday. Nov 24, 2000: This night Norwegian police officers illegally invades the basement of Mr Ekrem‘s private house. Several manifestations of abnormal behavior amongst local police officers are registered. Nov 26, 2000: The Iranian physician Mr Sharan MOGHADDAM (i.e Mr Shahram MOGHADDAM MAMEGHANI, NO-Brattvåg) attempted to tailgate Mr Ekrem this evening — he doesn‘t quite understand why Mr Ekrem still is alive (Mr Ekrem visited me three days earlier....and my alexipharmic etc knowledge is rather profound) — ! Mr Moghaddam did also behave strikingly aberrant Sep 29th, 2000, when a Norwegian police officer applying a forged front-door key broke into Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg, and injected a lethal dose poison into a liver paste canister (in order to somewhat delight the police employed assassins, I ate quite a lot of the envenomed paste.....before, of course, swallowing a potion antidote). It has been thoroughly documented Mr Sharan Moghaddam indulge himself in most irregular contact with Norwegian police officers et al. Nov 27, 2000: Around 03:00 AM several Norwegian police officers illegally burglarizes the basement of Mr Ekrem‘s private dwelling house, but flee from the locus in quo in two cars when informed they‘d been detected. Nov 29, 2000: Between 02 and 02:30 AM Norwegian police officers make efforts to break into Mr Sigmund M Ekrem‘s private house.....though they‘re successful in vandalizing the basement only. During a phone conversation with Mr J-K W (omitted name), Ålesund, the dialogue is sabotaged and multifold technical problems induced by Norwegian police officers on night duty are registered. Between 11:00 PM and midnight I speak with Mr Ole Martin Håndlykken and does, amongst other things, scornfully condemn the misbehavior of Norwegian police officers.

79 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Nov 30, 2000: A Norwegian police officer breaks into Mr Sigmund M Ekrem‘s private residence envenoming some refrigerated milk with mortiferous poison. Notice this was a Thursday. Dec 02, 2000: Telephone conversation with Mr Sigmund M Ekrem ca 02 AM — Mr Ekrem‘s bodily comfort is excellent, and he‘s joyful. Straightaway after our small talk, Mr Ekrem ingest a little bread sipping of the milk referred to above — he immediately became acutely sick and started vomiting violently. Throughout the night Mr Ekrem is constantly and seriously ill.....he‘s puking up numerous times, and in the morning he‘s fetched by an ambulance and forthright hospitalized in NO-Ålesund. Dec 05, 2000: Between 02:30 and 05:00 AM Norwegian police officers unlawfully breaks into the basement of Mr Ekrem‘s private dwelling — dislocating and messing up the drip-drying laundry. Dec 11, 2000: Norwegian police officers illegally burglarizes the basement of Mr Ekrem‘s private house stealing a newly washed — doormat...! Dec 23, 2000: Norwegian police officers utilizing a forged key absolutely illegitimately raids the first floor of Mr Ekrem‘s private house between 08:30 AM and 02:00 PM. Dec 25, 2000: During the afternoon/evening Norwegian police officers destroys the security locks in Mr Ekrem‘s dwelling in order to illegally encroach the living room &c. Mr Ekrem, returning from NO-Ålesund around 10:10 PM, does notice numerous footprints in the snow outside the house — probably imprints made by paramilitary boots and ca 31 cm‘s long, he‘ve told.

80 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Jan 08, 2001: Two Norwegian police officers breaks into the first-floor of Mr Ekrem‘s residence. Numerous footprints, ca 31 cm‘s long, in the snow on all sides of the house — in all likelihood made by (para-)military boots. A ladder has been raised alongside the southern part of the facade. Jan 14, 2001: Without statutory authority Norwegian police officers burglarizes and foul up the basement of Mr Ekrem‘s private house before, finally, scattering the content of several garbage sacks all over the floor. Jan 27, 2001: The underwriter forwards a writ of summons etc to a human rights tribunal describing some of the abominable crimes perpetrated by Norwegian police officers. A formal complaint written on behalf of Mr Sigmund Martin Ekrem is sent SEFO. Jan 28, 2001: Phone conversation with Miss LR (omitted name), NO-Ålesund, who fustigates the misdemeanor of employees and executrices etc at Ålesund Police Station. Jan 29, 2001: Phone conversation with Mr Ole Martin Håndlykken who, amongst other things, sharply reproach the Norwegian police force. Jan 30, 2001: Conversing a SEFO representative and counsellor Aspehaug (NO-Ålesund) — AO. Contact with freemasons well-informed about some of the criminality committed by Norwegian police officers etc. Allied intelligence/security services highly indignant at the criminality exercised by Norwegian police officers and judges etc. Jan 31, 2001: Concise dialogue with Mr Ivar Svendsgaard, SEFO, and the newspaper Sunnmørsposten (NO-Ålesund) — the mischief-makers referred to did both 81 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

receive info earlier this day shedding some light upon a few of the crimes committed by the Norwegian police force. Norwegian police has illegally embezzled and copied etc several SEFO-reports. Feb 01, 2001: Conversation with Mr Ole M Håndlykken who requested me to compose a formal complaint to SEFO — the actual report is written, and the Norwegian police force is familiar with correlated context. Phone conversation with Mr Egil DAHLE who — Oct 03, 1998 — lost his mind and murdered his concubine Miss Nina K RANTAPELKONEN. During the dialogue Mr Dahle gave emphasis to the fact he felt constantly provoked and harried by Norwegian police officers before the killing, and underlined said persecution strongly and negatively affected him — without corresponding terrorism it‘s much likely the slaying never had occurred, he declares. Further; Mr Dahle stress the fact Norwegian police officers, particularly Mr Finn GRANLIEN and Mr Frode ASBJØRNSEN (both NO-Ålesund Police HQ), not was markedly interested in the homicide per se — they exclusively snooped for personal information about me! Almost six months before the actual murder I notified the Norwegian EOS-Committee about the illegal surveillance &c of Mr Dahle and Miss Rantapelkonen. A postal executrix call me on the phone to tell a charge containing severe condemnation of Norwegian authorities ( — also the police — ) now had reached the international tribunal quesited. Today Mr Oddmund ROGNE, NO-Ålesund, ―disappears‖.....Norwegian police officers and Mr Sharan Moghaddam alike behaves grotesquely bizarre — especially between 6:00 and 7:00 PM. Feb 01th was a Thursday, and it should be noted Mr Rogne was below 175 cm‘s tall and delicately built. Feb 09, 2001: Mr Sharan Moghaddam (i.e Mr Shahram MOGHADDAM MAMEGHANI), NOBrattvåg, is ostensibly nervous and does like several Norwegian police officers attempt spying me out — apparently I knew too much.... Feb 13, 2001: Phone conversation with Mr OR (name omitted), NO-Fosnavåg, about the murderee Mr Kåre Jan TORVHOLM, NO-Moltustranda (Herøy), who died Dec

82 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

20th the previous year. Discussing the same subject with Mr MA (name omitted), NO-Selfors. Feb 14, 2001: ―Somebody‖ in SEFO has alarmed certain Norwegian police officers who suddenly displays significantly increased watchfulness when operating e.g AV spy-tech installed in Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg. Letters sent a few foreign embassies. The intrigue sheet Sunnmørsposten, NOÅlesund, is forwarded sparse info describing some of the damnable behavior exhibited by specific Norwegian police officers. Apparently promising modifications as regards the wiretapping of telephone (+47) 70 21 78 77. Feb 15, 2001: Certain Norwegian police officers behaves explicitly deviant between 10:00 and 11:00 AM. Mr Oddmund Rogne is ―stumbled upon‖ a few hours later — dead. This day Mr Einar RUNDE, NO-Runde (Herøy), unexpectedly ―disappears‖ while recreationally stretching his legs in the Aksla-region (NO-Ålesund). Mr Runde was seen alive 3:30 PM, and the crew on the pilot boat where he worked began worrying when he didn‘t show up as appointed 05:00 PM. The local police force was well acquainted with the fact Mr Runde habitually promenaded the Akslaarea, and definitively knew he was going to turn up in the actual landscape this afternoon. Mr Einar Runde was less than 175 cm‘s tall, of rather non-athletic built and not particularly strong dynamometric. Feb 15th was, of course, a Thursday. Feb 18, 2001: Several Norwegian police officers behaves conspicuously inapposite all day through — especially by night when some of them stealthily trespassed my residential boundaries in Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg, and surreptitiously started studying the main entrance to my house.....the doorway was apparently of particular interest! Some hours later Mr Einar Runde is ―found‖ cold and garrotted on the northern side of NO-Aksla.....and the police, of course, ―doesn‘t suspect anything criminal‖.....usw! (Important sections omitted)

Wilhelm Werner Winther 83 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Oct 30, 2003:

A FEW COMMENTS TO ABOVE CHRONOLOGY Sep 08th last year I visited one of my cousins and, in order to spark off a jocund discussion, I played ―the devils advocate‖ enthusiastically arguing all Norwegians righteously could distil their own spirits to battle the official wine and liquor monopoly and unreasonable high alcohol prices (anno 2002 a bottle [70 cl‘s] Glenfiddich Pure Malt Whiskey costed US$ 56,70; a bottle Johnnie Walker Black Label Whiskey US$ 54,80; a bottle Martell Medaillon VSOP Cognac US$ 62,00; a bottle Smirnoff Vodka [prod in the USA] US$ 52,70 and a bottle plain 60% spirit [prod in Norway] US$ 51,30). I was beforehand perfectly aware parts of my cousins private house had been bugged by my police employed tormentors, and sure enough; the eavesdropping police officers swiftly decided to create some ―action‖ by adding easily obtainable methanol to some known deposits of alleged contraband spirits — thus creating nationwide attention favorable to the Norwegian police force and detrimental for the ―illegal‖ buying and selling of alcohol &c. A few days later the first Norwegians started to die of the devilish poisoning, and the murderers, of course, actively warned the population against the fatal spirits — a ―great show‖ where the poisoners had much fun investigating crimes committed by themselves (cf Doc #2907)! The 06th prev mo I jokingly conversed a likable shopassistant reassuring her I wholeheartedly supported those distilling their own firewater.....and the chitchat was, as expected, recorded by Norwegian police officers eavesdropping the counter/till-division of the actual grocery in NO-Brattvåg. Four–five days later the first victims of methanol poisoning from NO-Brattvåg was hospitalized in NOÅlesund, and some of the culpable police officers received much publicity from harum-scarum newspapers like Sunnmørsposten (NO-Ålesund) and Haramsnytt (NO-Brattvåg). The police interrogated and jailed several guiltless persons — charging them with criminality perpetrated by Norwegian police officers. It‘s no accident Mr Ove FINNES, NO-Brattvåg, was sheriff temporary appointee when Norwegian police officers previous month envenomed claimed contraband spirits in NO-Haram county. Mr Finnes was the sheriff temporary in charge Nov 2000, too — when Norwegian police officers attempted to dispatch Mr Sigmund M EKREM by adding deadly poison to his milk. The 20th prev mo I decided to furnish a local shopkeeper known to be illegally surveilled with some information likely to arouse particular interest and fear amongst ―certain police officers‖, and two days later I reassured the same storekeeper in NO-Brattvåg we now had many conclusive pieces of evidence 84 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

against the Norwegian police in the ―methanol case‖ — the eavesdropped &c information greatly disturbed the culpable police officers! The subsequent day, Sep 23rd, a middle-aged woman ―disappears‖ from her private home in NO-Langevåg — less than one hour comfortable drive from NO-Brattvåg. The Norwegian Ministry of Defence et al has recently hammered out official stratagems for beguiling &c the national population, and military/civil authorities have exhibited a certainly morbid interest for v.g clairvoyance and human genius — so, charlatans and insignificantly gifted persons claiming to be ―second sighted‖ are now engaged to trace the ―vanished‖ woman, and a contemptible hanky-panky show is sparked....! None truly clairvoyant will ever render the slightest assistance to Norwegian authorities/police, and their abilities are never for sale or entertainment! As regards the recurrent and chronologically described housebreakings, this is but a part of the terror wontedly exercised by Norwegian police to harm persons v.g opposed to their pervading corruption. The objective is normally to induce regular paranoia or — e.g when the victim formally reports the absurd pestering, to falsely accuse him of beeing psychotic and thus — by way of befoolable physicians et al finding unbelievable his truthful narration of continuous and manifold harassment carried out by Norwegian police officers — having him locked up at an official madhouse. This tactic has proved magnificent for ruining a persons reputation, health and economy usw! Norwegian police has for years actively collected information about the pathogenic effects of bodily/mental stress and torture, and they‘ve villainously surveilled and persecuted real psychiatric patients in their private homes while tentatively exploring techniques inflicting various degrees of disability. Considered the occurrence of pathologic depression and stark madness are comparatively more frequent in Norway than elsewhere in Europe, it‘s especially noticeable Norwegian physicians clearly and statistically negatively distinguish themselves as proner to psychiatric suffering and bizarre fits etc than the population generally. With an average full-scale Wechsler IQ of 123,5 (distribution of WAIS IQ — : 110-119, 16%; 120-129, 56% and 130-139, 27%) Norwegian physicians no way can be singled out as noometrically superior to other professional groups as v.g secondary school teachers, graduate engineers, jurists or chartered accountants. Howbeit — Norwegian physicians indeed exel in other respects: they‘re absolutely overrepresented when it comes to accomplished suicide, conjugal troubles and drug abuse — and their histrionic personality frequency, autopsychic insufficiency and cacoëthes for personal power are truly unparalleled by other occupational subdivisions! When a Norwegian physician has outreached his self-righteous potential and disclamatory capacity, he‘s very likely to behave self-destructive/-defeating as the truth about his fatal mistakes, 85 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

intellectual shortcoming, criminality and apparent incompetence no longer can be denied for himself or eventually hidden from public view. Though the average full-scale WAIS IQ for Norwegian police officers is 11 points subordinate to ditto median for physicians, their streetwise-quotient (SWQ) and everyday realism by far and in terms of convertible practicality transcends the half-assed sophomania and mawkish narcissism diathetically characteristic and con variazioni dictating the quixotic Weltanschauung of most Norwegian MDs. Thus the street-smart police officer is likely to succeed when he attempts to convince the authority menial and ivory towered would-be felos-dese-medico that you‟re crazy! Advancing even readily documentable facts is very imprudent in depicted situation — notions/expressions etc as: CO/REMOBS (Central Office — Remote Observance), reversed-biased-diode/neon-bulb/spare-pair/spare-pair-to-earpiece & microphone/ground-return/third-wire bypass, line extension, howl-back, hookswitch mute circuit, four-layer device, capacitive discharge from interconnected bug conductors, capacitor/condenser deviance due to insufficient polarization (frequency/current/cycle discrepancy), dielectric losses, unnatural resistor resistance (unsteady voltage and current weakness — the varying potential difference doesn‘t properly match the output signal), slave device, drop out rely, Wavecom/Trango tech, QAM/BPSK/ATSC pilots, horizontal/vertical retrace sync pulse, TEMPEST, CRT synchronizing, ELINT, coaxially interconnected monitors, EMR, demodulation, carrier wave frequency, signal amplitude, COMINT, HUMINT, SIGINT, TSCM, ANDVT (Advanced Narrowband Digital Voice Terminal), SINCGARS (Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System), GCCS (Global Command Central System), ATW (Advanced Tactical Workstation), IDHS (Intelligence Data Handling System), IMINT (Imagery Intelligence), ECHELON, satellite interception (of terrestrial microwave spillage etc), SONET (Synchronous Optical Network), wideband snapshot analyzers, assorted surveillance multisource/-sensor integration and algorithm parameters are but a few examples of high-relevant concepts and acronyms &c to be avoided completely when confabulating the unrealistic — and perhaps drugged — physician injudiciously gawking at you behind his rosepink spectacles! You won‘t tell this uppish meshuggener the truth — you‘re going to fabricate a tenable nursery-tale closely matching his unsightly ignorance....yeah; you‘ll cheerfully piggyback his self-deceptive paralogisms and nod slyly approvingly when his shamus-amenable moonshine casts grotesque shadows onto the lunatic quagmire of grey matter constituting the firmament of his castle-in-the-sky haecceity! In a forthcoming document authenticated data etc will tell you why and how often Norwegian physicians employ premeditated killing, mutilation, torture, 86 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

incarceration and insalubrious stigmatizing as therapy.....to ambitiously cure — themselves! It should be distinctly underscored though; Norwegian police officers generally exerts themselves considerable to fashion their terror suchwise none aptly believes the actual victim(-s) — they‘re likely to play on what‘s markedly absurd, and to deliberately abuse the wholly unjustified confidence specifically naive, toadyish and servile good-for-nothings consuetudinary displays vis-à-vis Norwegian authorities. As regards the entry of Feb 01, 2001 I briefly direct attention to a few facts in my report to the Norwegian EOS-Committee of Apr 06th, 1998: The leader of the EOS-Committee, Mr Rikard OLSVIK, belongs to the same political party as the father of my former — and murdered — fiancée, Miss Elin DALSEGG. They reside the same village, and has for years been politically active in the same local council — they‘re close acquaintances. In said EOS-report the pathologic traits and ostensible evilness characterizing the various housebreakings &c in Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg, are highlighted. One day — Mar 30, 1998 — there was 3 successive and demonstratively offensive break-ins in my private house! The local main instigator of mentioned and a dozen other housebreakings and grave offences, was Mr Thorleif MARKEN — the regional and much underestimated sheriff. Though wanting as regards sophistication and formal education, his Stanford-Binet IQ of 143 and atavistic huntsman-instinct made him more dangerous than rest of the police employed pushovers. Mr Marken is going to ridicule and firmly deny all ties to described crimes etc — even when confronted with absolutely conclusive items of evidence.....but it won‘t help him anyhow; the metalegal execution of sentence is steadily approaching, and he won‘t bear the multiform and interminable penal agony usw particularly well — ! When it comes to Mr Egil (Ørn) DAHLE and Nina K RANTAPELKONEN they both, together with 6 other persons, was summoned as central witnesses in an oncoming criminal proceedings against Norwegian authorities — and we believe this largely explains the satanic terror exercised by Norwegian police officers. In my recital to the EOS-Committee those responsible for aforesaid terror are applied legally charged, indicted and punished for corresponding crimes (cf Doc #377). The 7 members of the EOS-Committee is appointed by the Norwegian Parliament, and the committee — according to Norwegian law of Feb 03, 1995 (No 7) — is supposed to control intelligence gathering, surveillance assignments and security services ordained, executed or supervised by Norwegian public administration. The EOS-Committee is v.g responsible for preventing injustice and unnecessary restraint etc imposed by Norwegian authorities. Though the functions of the EOSCommittee — as regulated by law — has limited scope and extent when it comes 87 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

to investigation &c of criminal offences committed by e.g Norwegian politicians and ministry employed principals, Mr Rikard Olsvik clearly belongs to the officials responsible for encouraging and through unlawful and intentional failure to perform his duties sanctioning the totally illegal and most repulsive terrorism provoking and actually resulting in the murdering of Miss Nina K Rantapelkonen. As regards the murderer per se, Mr Egil (Ørn) Dahle, he was criminally irresponsible at the moment of committing the act. Mr Dahle has since 1998 been the victim of evil-minded alienists methodically and premeditatedly undermining his health through applied chemotorture and physical coercion etc officially and deceptively termed ―therapy‖ or ―psychiatric treatment‖. It must be sharply emphasized Mr Dahle himself — confined, tortured, brainwashed and afraid retaliatory mistreatment — pretty much will be unable to give a plain-spoken account of many circumstances juridically and otherwise advantageous to him and harmful to the civil servants continuously hectoring him. With respect to the insinuated killings of Mr Oddmund ROGNE and Mr Einar RUNDE, I‘ll brusquely remark they‘re ―only‖ two of the 30 — thirty — men and women deliberately murdered by Norwegian police officers AD 2001 and 2002. The various first-degree murders are typically camouflaged as suicides, disappearances, accidents, intoxications or as natural/medical insufficiencies — e.g renal, valvular, cardiac or respiratory insufficiency (provoked cerebrovascular accidents — apoplexia is another but more resource demanding way of killing). Optimizing publicity is normally essential for Norwegian police — an objective easily attained by, e.g, abducting and dispatching comparatively young persons likely to be lamented by a considerable number inexperienced and sentimental teens in search of consolation. Initially Norwegian police officers found outlet for some of their psychopathy and criminal predisposition through covert AV surveillance of guiltless citizens in the latters private homes etc, but soon discovered most people morally and otherwise was their superiors and significantly more honorable than formerly expected. The sexual excitement originally obtained through their voyeurism gradually vanished, and some Norwegian police officers started looking for new stimulus. The actual police officers quickly realized getting away with murder was surprisingly simple and that Norwegian burghers and mass media &c was delightfully easy to con. Murdering more or less randomly targeted victims was indeed extraordinarily thrilling, and offered the police officers the existential ―kick‖ they strongly yearned for. However....after a while the urge to kill turned uncontrollable, and most of the Norwegian police officers involved in the murdering became slightly worried — their fatal compulsion controlled them, and the assassinations could only and eventually be postponed somewhat. As this warning is publicized, thoroughly planning the different killings becomes more important for the actual police officers — the police officers in quest are known to apply false accusations/pretexts, to procure/display official/forged documents and to abuse their professional identity cards and service marks/stamps to 88 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

approach/arrest their gullible victims before murdering them. The surveillance of oncoming murderees through cellular phone monitoring has heretofore been a modi operandi characteristic — allowing the police officers to geographically pinpoint potential victims, and to predict their future movements. After the publication of Document #777 (cf entry of Jun 18, 2000, above) Norwegian police is known to have replaced v.g celluar phones originally carried by their slain soft marks immediately prior to the murder.....afterwards ―discovering‖ the phone in e.g the victims private homes, makes the ―suicide‖ and ―voluntary disappearance‖ theories more plausible ( — in the actual cases explicatory notes &c composed by the murderee has, hitherto, been nonexistent).

Wilhelm Werner Winther

89 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

MORAL/LEGISLATIVE MEDLEY As regards official criminality in Norway, the number explicit lawbreakings recorded by adjacent branch of Hellvow Anticorruption clearly reflects the execrable and usually well-masked contempt for human rights, democratic standards and the basic principles of corresponding legal system distinctly prevalent amongst Norwegian officiaries practically routinely abusing their professional privileges to e.g seriously offend fellowmen and consequently elude the criminal investigation and prosecution juridically pertinent. The blatant hypocrisy and treacherous opportunism by and large characterizing nowadays Norwegian officials, was befittingly coined ―bigoterie‖ in medieval France — germanely delineating the grungy and widespread practice amongst Norwegian Normans to worship the Christian Trinity as well as their heathen deities out of strictly materialistic motives.....whereas — following Christian baptism, the French regularly bestowed generous gifts on ―converted‖ pagans. So, the largely marauding Norwegians shamelessly exploited Gallic benevolence and Catholic naïveté maximally, and quite a few of them underwent sacramental affusion and immersion more than seven times.....! I‘ll return to described tartufferie and indecent fickleness farther down in this document — forasmuch as these are indigenous and statutorily constitutional characteristics still indispensable to official, Norwegian corruption.

NORWEGIAN VICE SPREADING When the Norwegian prime minister — Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK — in 2001 and subsequent to a nervous breakdown and atypical burnout declared he had felt like ―nought‖ prior to and during the actual collapse in 1998 (cf vg the front-page of Dagbladet [NO-Oslo] of May 19, 2001), he conspicuously portrayed the massively preponderant inferiority complex and religious insecurity verily typifying the Christian officials keenly advocating widespread abuse of the 90 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

cobweb-optics (cf Doc #627 above, ―Appendix‖) and given nano-microphones etc in strictly private, Norwegian homes. Like the weeds in our gardens, what‘s otherwise harmful and undesirable tends to spread rapidly.....and the mephitic deviltry of Mr Bondevik (cf e.g Doc #1022 above) and the official bushbilkers around him, are no exception! Let me cite one of my own aphorisms: ―Nowadays Norway most strikingly resemble a melanotic sarcoma metastatically spreading its fatal perversion and intrinsic hellishness worldwide!‖ Informed readers will recall the atypical, political contact between the ―commander-in-chief‖ of Indivisiblia, Mr Jorge Rambler SHRUB, and Mr Kjell Magne Bondevik and his government representatives etc last year. Through my Internet pages Mr Shrub had learnt about the cobweb-optics, and Mr Bondevik had duly confirmed the abuse of this spytech (— for purportedly decent reasons, of course —) in a recorded phone conversation. Mr Bondevik and his depraved accomplices was perfectly aware able and nationally independent investigators readily would uncover dozens of heinous and officially supported/authorized violations of vg international human rights covenants ratified by Norway, and thus was desperately in need of obtaining goodwill from the Indivisiblian government AO. In this way the military powerful Indivisiblia effortlessly purchased cobweb-optics and necessary know-how about producing it. Six months ago corresponding spyoptics was already field operative in Mr Shrub‘s homeland. The detestable and downright abuse of cobweb-optics will now accelerate significantly, and erelong be a cursed threat and irritant hideously havocking the privacy of guiltless citizens worldwide.....; don‘t forget to ―compliment‖ Norway for forthcoming iniquity! The cobweb-optics per se and its damnable misapplication is properly scorned in Isaiah 59, verses 5–8 (the Lord‘s Servant speaking): ―They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a spider‘s web. Whoever eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched. Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves with what they make. Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence are in their hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed innocent blood. Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and destruction mark their ways. The way of peace they do not know; 91 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

there is no justice in their paths. They have turned them into crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.‖ Against the fiendish violations of human integrity and personal autonomy implicitly imposed by the increased abuse of e.g secret monitoring and varietal eavesdropping devices, I‘ll give you a highly efficient weapon no one and nothing ever can deprive you:

REGULATION ―Whoever supposing they actually are, has been or in the future will become victims of uninvited and undesirable monitoring, overhearing or spying in their private houses, apartments, lodgings, vehicles or abodes or in any unspecified dwelling, construction or place of residing apart from this where compelled to stay for a given time, can — independent of religious faith and theological opinions and whether the spytechnology are mobile or stationary — by addressing God Almighty in silent or voiced prayer, righteously demand eternally condemned and maximally severely punished in Hell anybody directly or indirectly guilty in exercising or authorizing aforesaid violations of their privacy, and their application shall immediately be registered and granted in agreement with the stipulations laid down by Me, God‘s Servant, in nearby Regulation and otherwise.‖

REGULATORY PARTICULARIZATION/AMPLIFICATION 1) Those applying for condemnation and punishment of their aggressors in conformity with above Regulation, can‘t themselves employ vg electronic, technical, wave-based, optical, vitreous or visual contrivances, composites, arrangements or constructions offending others privacy pursuant to said Regulation. 2) As for Jewish officials directly acting on behalf of Israeli authorities and for information gathered through clairvoyance, there are moderate modifications in respect of above Regulation, but abuse are punished in either case. 3) The Regulation is wholly inapplicable vis-à-vis God‘s and Satan‘s angels, and does primarily — but not exclusively — apply to mankind. 92 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

4) The human body is a most private and inalienable abode, and the Regulation perfectly apply to all kinds of detectors, sensors, transmitters, electronics and technology etc installed in or at it — item in or at clothing, movables, paraphernalia, outfit and personal luggage — without the owners explicit and voluntary consent. 5) In regular psychiatric institutions, medical hospitals and authentic health care situations where observation is strictly required for life rescuing reasons, observers/sensors/cameras wholly visible or tactile for the patient may be employed in critical phases — whereas secret monitoring is punishable in agreement with above Regulation. 6) The Regulation wholly apply to hidden and overt audiovisual surveillance in buildings and constructions formally and authentically consecrated worship of God Almighty — whereas use of plain smoke/fire/gas detectors/alarms in said structures are permissible. 7) Divine enforcement of the Regulation is entirely independent of and unaffected by human, worldly and transmundane beliefs/opinions, sanctions/conventions/agreements, laws/rules/jurisprudence and approval etc. 8) The Regulation has Tellurian and cosmical extent and applicability.

MEMENTO Above regulation won‘t be ―particularly popular‖ amongst vg criminal investigators and military intelligence officers — anyhow; hitherto there ‘ve been committed no crime anywhere impossible to clear up without e.g technical eavesdropping and visual surveillance.....if unable to solve the puzzles without employing criminal investigation procedures ethically and otherwise unacceptable, you‘re more or less unqualified as detective and intelligence officer! Adequately punishing those hamartiologically and thus genuinely culpable — as opposed to those found guilty in offending man-made rules by a profane 93 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

jury, and for that sake held chargeable — has in no way been and will never become the slightest problem! Furthermore; as the human intellect and discerning capabilities are markedly limited and easily led astray item penal provisions and penological methods vastly insufficient and regularly fallacious secularly, sentencing fellowmen normally should be discouraged. The greater part of humanity has heretofore unwittingly cuddled the fatally popular misbelief Divine regulations can be rightfully violated or even annulled through man-ordained decrees and treaties usw.....and the worst example of this macabre illusion, is the widespread belief homicides and various atrocities are wholly acceptable — and even praiseworthy — as part of officially approved warfare and armed operations. However — you‘ve not been told murdering is prohibited exclusively on sunny days and in peacetime, whereas permissible on rainstormy nights and in wartime.....nay; — you‘ve been instructed NOT to commit manslaughter, and this Divine commandment is ABSOLUTE! Yes, guys....; you‘ll find the war heroes from Waterloo and your decorated veterans from vg the World Wars in the worst parts of Hell! — every soldier is his own, supreme commander, and thus fully and personally answerable for his misdeeds. The usual apologies: “I just obeyed orders!”, “I‟ve only done my job!”, “I‟m a good Christian/Muslim!”, “I‟ve confessed my sins and the priest granted me absolution!” and “I felt convinced slaying the enemy was perfectly legal in warfare!” have never saved a single man-of-arms or murderer from everlasting damnation and torments in Hell..... As for murdering during regular military/armed operations ordained by legal, Israeli authorities, there are own regulations and exempts for Jewish soldiers and security officers defending and maintaining Israeli borders and territory as biblically stipulated. Whereas man is sufficiently intelligent to manufacture, load and murderously let off a number of weapons, he — symptomatically enough — is unable to comprehend the ultimate consequences of his actions.....

ADDITIONAL REGULATION ―Nontherapeutic/elective/artificial abortion of the human fetus/embryo will from today (April 16, 2004) be Divinely punished as regular and premeditated 94 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

murder — whereas volitional use of oral contraceptives, tubal ligation, vasectomy, spermicides, condoms and intrauterine devices are acceptable for preventing conception.‖  The Additional Regulation has Tellurian and cosmical extent and applicability.  The Additional Regulation primarily — but not exclusively — apply to mankind.  Divine enforcement of the Additional Regulation is entirely independent of and unaffected by human, worldly and transmundane beliefs/opinions, sanctions/conventions/agreements, laws/rules/jurisprudence and approval etc.

OFFICIAL NORWEGIAN HYPOCRISY AND MALEVOLENCE Subsequent comments are but an epitomized presentation of certain motivational etc aspects coalescing the highly alarming integral of manifest crimes committed by Norwegian officials since 1992 — In Norwegian the words ―hell‖ and ―luck‖ are synonyms, but it‘s rather doubtful this fact alone wholly can explain the conspicuous enthusiasm exhibited by Norwegian officials striving to force their way into Hell! Anyhow — when examining motivational factors underpinning the disastrous behavior demonstrated by Norwegian officials premeditatedly violating the human rights, terrorizing guiltless individuals and illegally depredating/surveilling etc private dwellings, we‘ll find certain predominant and recurrent personality traits:  Inadequate judgmental ability,  rejoice in evildoing,  superiority/inferiority complexes and complemental maladjustment/overcompensation,  falsehood, hypocrisy and double-dealing,  psychiatric conditions and illusions,  corruptibility and deceitfulness,  religious insecurity/confusion,  enviousness and spite,  arrogance and cantankerousness,  gloominess and irritability,  peevishness and aggression, item 95 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

 general lability. It‘s documented most Norwegian police officers and psychiatrists examined had marked, antisocial personality traits already when 12 years old. Cf Doc #633 (―CAUSE OF ACTION‖) above, ―Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome‖ (―NPSMS‖). Some of the morbid corruption typifying Norwegian psychiatrists can be illustrated by an authentic example: Three psychiatrists had gathered in a locked room where they — normally — could speak confidentially. They discussed the ongoing, secret audiovisual monitoring of certain internees, and agreed it was medically/ethically appropriate to diagnose a given person as ―paranoid schizophrenic‖ because he — absolutely correctly — felt surveilled. The conclusion was reached thus; as the integrity of Norwegian authorities were unquestionable, the compulsory committed internee was supposed to feel safe and sans gêne and to trust the psychiatrists unconditionally when reassured none was clandestinely watching him.....when the victim still insisted he was surveilled, it was deemed psychotic since — according to the psychiatrists — there were no apparent reasons to distrust them, and because the internee impossible could see the cobweb-optic and tiny microphones installed several places in his cell....! Truly; — whenever encountering such primitive duplicity, you apodictically knows you‘re amongst ―civilized‖ bipeds! After the Second WW Norwegian physicians has partaken and initiated dozens of ethically and otherwise damnable experiments on allegedly retarded, psychotic or antisocial internees — like; exposing unconscious/ignorant/disagreeing victims to radioactive contamination, interstitial/ionizing radiation and intoxication with LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide) and mescaline etc. In a strictly negative sense, Norwegian physicians as vg Mr Wilhelm SEM-JACOBSEN, Mr Ole H ROBAK, Mr Odvar SKAUG, Mr Gordon JOHNSEN, Mr Leo EITINGER, Mr Nils RETTERSTØL and Mr Odd LINGJÆRDE are particularly noteworthy in this connection..... A further description of Norwegian physicians and their peculiarities are found in Doc #1536 (―A FEW COMMENTS TO ABOVE CHRONOLOGY‖) above, and in some of My aphorisms. The Norwegian politicians urging and passively supporting illegal surveillance of My private house and whereabouts etc, have chiefly been motivated by a brutally fatal thirst for specialized knowledge, and Norway is still the only country where thoroughly warned government representatives commits unpardonable sacrileges to gain theological information! 96 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

While they all were fully aware God banished Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden because they illegally ate fruits from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (cf Genesis, chapters 2 and 3), they apparently felt sure it was all right to terrorize His Servant* (*cf Doc‘s ##599, 777, 1022 and 1536 above item Isaiah, chapters 42, 49, 50 and 59 etc) continuously for years inasmuch as insisting their motives were ―respectable‖! Acquainted with various Christian doctrines, the Norwegian prime minister — Mr Kjell Magne Bondevik (cf Doc‘s ##1022 and 1049 above) — and his religious accomplices believed they ruthlessly, endlessly and unpunished could exploit/abuse evangelical reassurances about forgiveness to repetitively commit the most disgusting offences! While seeing the pope for absolution or praying for exculpation, their ignoble minds were busy planning new, abominable violations! I tell you the truth: not only are the actual politicians/officials irrevocably and perpetually condemned, they‘ll belong to the absolutely most hated and mercilessly tormented sinners in Hell as well....! Though completely aware eternal condemnation and punishment were inevitable for personnel involved in the nauseating surveillance, Norwegian politicians have urged the satanic undertaking by promising higher retirement pensions etc to hesitating officials arguing the activity fell outside their professional duties. And, sensing their contemptible terrorism may be sharply reprobated by new officeholders AO, Norwegian politicians and police officers has tried to obnubilate their vice by surreptitiously fabricating and depositing repugnantly false suspicions — like the one I was a dangerous intelligence officer and spy collecting sensitive information about Norway for a fiendish nation....! It has, of course, been crucial to Norwegian authorities to prevent impartial/adequate criminal investigation, mar My general reputation and to deny Me fair trials and exculpating compensations etc in order to outwardly maintain the pro forma semblance of their hellish falsifications — (There are many celebrated examples illustrating how dogmatic biblicism and exegetic confusion has sent otherwise reputable persons straight to Hell, and I willingly accept mankind‘s inquiry for authorized guidance. It‘s My God-given mandate to amend or annul etc whatever parts of vg the Bible deemed insufficient by Me, and I may later fulfill this optional commission.) As for Norwegian police officers, you‘ll get a tolerably accurate picture of their mentality etc by studying the various documents above — item My aphorisms. Nevertheless — the striking attempts Norwegian police officers has made to infiltrate vg humanitarian/charitable, political and health related organizations etc in order to further professional influence, should be emphasized. Unfortunately members of such coalitions may be easily duped, as many of them are naturally caritative, idealistic and unbiased — characteristics the police officers, wholly undeservingly, wish to be professionally associated with..... 97 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

April 16, 2004

Wilhelm Werner Winther

98 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

COMPLAINT VS NORWEGIAN POLICE OFFICIALS Though fully aware Norwegian authorities will make no honest attempts whatsoever to clear up grave criminality committed by v.g their corrupted police officers and judges, they‘ll receive a pro forma copy of nearby notification. No pieces of evidence will be handed over to Norwegian authorities, and it‘s beneath the dignity of upright and informed persons to associate friendly with their depraved representatives. Norway will soon cease to exist altogether, and in respect of this fact we‘re unwilling to spend time on elaborate reports. Shortly, Norwegian police officers are accused of: 1. ATTEMPTED ARSON (in my private house, NO-Brattvåg, the 13th inst between 12:30 and 1:00 PM), 2. SABOTAGE (of an oil-filled radiator [in my private house, NO-Brattvåg, the 13th inst], an electric cooker [in my private house, NO-Brattvåg, Feb 03 ha between 9 and 9:15 PM] and my fax machine [in my private house — NO-Brattvåg — Nov 04, 2001]), 3. BURGLARY (in my rented cars — lately May 16 ha between 10:30 and 11 PM), 4. AGGRAVATED THEFT (from the private car of my cousin in NOMauseidvåg — Mr Knut M Skotheimsvik — Oct 17, 2003), and 5. TERRORISM (more than 200 incidents....). The police officers guilty of described criminality are demanded prosecuted, sentenced and punished. 99 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

June 14, 2004

Wilhelm Werner Winther (complainant)

100 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

CASUAL BRIEFING — SOME ANNOTATIONS In connection with a blatantly injurious article published by the Norwegian tabloid ―Verdens Gang‖ (―VG‖) Jul 28th ha, Hellvow Anticorruption circulated some information in defence of the actual victim, Mr Per Erik FOSSUM. Corresponding newspaper article depicted Mr Fossum as a murderer because — according to Norwegian police — he had sold contraband spirits containing a potentially lethal amount methyl alcohol (ie ―methanol‖, CH3OH) de facto resulting in the death of some Norwegians. Hellvow Anticorruption emphasized the documentable fact Mr Fossum was the target of inveterate police crookery deceptively portraying Norwegian police officers as upright and well-meaning individuals through conspiratorial wangling, slyly accommodated criminality and tactical framing of persons and associations etc disliked by them. Moreover, Hellvow Anticorruption underscored Norwegian police officers themselves — subsequent to longtime and absolutely contemptible surveillance of Mr Fossum — added the methanol to the spirits mala fide, and now calculatingly exploited intended confusion (cf Doc #1536 — ―A FEW COMMENTS TO ABOVE CHRONOLOGY‖). Mr Fossum was completely unaware the spirits sold surreptitiously had been poisoned by Norwegian police! Mr Fossum‘s lawyer, Mr Benedict DE VIBE (C J Hambros pl 5, NO-Oslo), has been recommended to launch a claim for damages for his client and — later on — to lodge an appeal to an international human rights tribunal. Hellvow Anticorruption has signalized readiness to supply final proofs against the culpable police officers. 101 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

ANNOTATIONS Ad nauseam we‘ve witnessed how Norwegian police officers expediently perpetrates and provokes grave criminality exclusively to ride high on the confusion and fear thereby produced. Besides, aposematically liberticidal bureaucrats opportunistically championing gross injustice steadfastly goose-steps towards the totalitarian, Norwegian police state.....and in major respects the democratic government system has proven ruefully deficient. In a regular tyranny statutes and the application of law normally will be adapted so as to legitimate, simplify and consolidate authoritarian oppression of ―commoners‖ item — of course — the right to criminalize, confine and suitably stigmatize ―dangerous‖ libertarians etc. So, consequently we advise you to hasten whatever countermeasures deemed objectively adequate and ethically appropriate to protect yourself, your relatives and friends etc against human rights violating, life endangering and otherwise unlawful interference from Norwegian authorities (et al).....and — remember: Not all prohibited by man-made bodies of laws are truly ―wrong‖, and not everything permitted by worldly rules and regulations actually ―right‖ — the Criminal Code, hardly being anything but a spurious collection of factitious opinions and fallible arguments, must never become our ultimate key to what‘s unadulteratedly correct, praiseworthy or reprehensible!

Aug 07, 2004

HELLVOW ANTICORRUPTION (Wilh. Werner Winther)

102 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

UN-DOCUMENT DHL NORWAY — A GRAVE SECURITY RISK! The 20th previous month we sent a registered and insured human rights document to the permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations — Ambassador Andrey I DENISOV, Esq (New York, USA). The actual sending, DHL Express registration #4451756761, was forwarded through the DHL office in Vegsundet, NO-6037 Eidsnes. At indicated DHL location worked a rather young man identifying himself as DHL employee Hans Edvard (TORVIK) GAUSDAL (NO-Ålesund). Mr Gausdal had beforehand been instructed by representatives from the Norwegian Police ―Security Service‖ (i.e ―PST‖) how to assist them with illegally photographing/recording the content in the perfectly legal human rights document to UN Representative and Ambassador Denisov, Esq (— more than a week before actually mailing aforesaid document, we consulted the driver of a DHL-transporter operating in the Brattvåg-area — simply demanding some freight charges information. The driver immediately reported our request to other, DHL employed police informants.....so, Norwegian police had plenty of time to instruct eg the DHL traitors Mr Gausdal and Ms BRANDAL* [*DHL office in Lihauggata 8-B, NO-Ålesund]). In order to perpetrate the treachery, Mr Gausdal categorically refused to accept mentioned sending if not allowed to read corresponding document. So —; Mr Gausdal read .....and surreptitiously had the human rights document to Ambassador Denisov, Esq, filmed.....at his own responsibility! The amount of guilt ascribable to Mr Gausdal, is thus maximal..... 103 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

We‘ve invited the DHL administration to comment above episode, but ‘ve heard nothing from them. Investigation ‘ve nevertheless divulged close and clearly criminal cooperation between Norwegian police and DHL in this case — beforehand we‘d noticed a degree of corruption also in the DHL ―Nordic Customer Care‖ service..... It should be thoroughly emphasized the actual and DHL forwarded human rights document exclusively deals with grave criminality and human rights violations committed by Norwegian authorities (Norwegian authorities were well acquainted with this fact, and thus had obvious motives for illegally obstructing etc the sending). Described iniquity is but one of a dozen recent examples clearly demonstrating Norwegian authorities ‘ve no dignity whatever — they respect neither the Russian Federation nor the human rights, and when the Norwegian Minister of Gross Injustice — Mr Odd Einar DØRUM — arrived at NO-Brattvåg Sep 21th ha (fully informed about and juridically responsible for the illegal copying of aforesaid human rights document), he had required a number naval officers and enlisted men for extraordinary protection! It should be underscored that the recent chief of the Norwegian ―Security Service‖ Police, Mr Jørn HOLME, is Mr Dørum‘s former secretary. Mr Holme has also worked as a senior public prosecutor for the National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime in Norway — ―Økokrim‖, and thus is a former colleague of vg Mr Hans-Petter JAHRE (cf Doc #115 above) and Mr Anstein Birger GJENGEDAL (cf Doc #377 above — entry of Oct 26, 2000). Long-standing, ample and bitter experience ‟ve duly confirmed Norwegian authorities object vg generosity, compassion and mildness as exploitable weaknesses — as a frank invitation to carry on and intumesce their manipulative hellishness......and; — if ever accepting their seemingly charitable offers, you give ‟em the upper hand, and they‟ll despise you even more because of your manifest humble and gullible nature...!

A much sterner attitude vs Norwegian authorities is a prerequisite, and no excuses can be accepted in this case — as described violations are sanctioned etc by central members of the Norwegian Government.

104 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Oct 06, 2004

HELLVOW ANTICORRUPTION (Wilh. Werner WINTHER, President)

PS: The human rights document to Ambassador and UN Representative Andrey I DENISOV, Esq, was strongly supposed to be stolen and/or read by hostile individuals — a fact clearly stressed in adjacent text. Consequently ―some‖ emails etc from us ‘ve contained stuff tactically designed to bewilder Norwegian authorities in a serviceable manner...!

PPS: We‘ve decided to add a few words about the ―cobweb-optics‖ (cf vg Doc #123 [―Accessory information and remarks‖] and Doc #2037 [―NORWEGIAN VICE SPREADING‖] above) — the spy-tech most execrably abused by the Norwegian Police ―Security Service‖ et al. Some years ago representatives from Hellvow Anticorruption SA visited the contemporary production site for this unquestionably efficient technology. The plant, formally owned by the state controlled company ―Telenor AS(A)‖ — ie ―Norwegian Telecommunications‖, was situated in one of the southernmost towns in Norway. Looking rather ordinary, the combined maintenance shop and factory had an apparently abandoned compartment; old dust and patinated rubbish on the hallway floor.....regular spiderweb in the corners.....seemingly a forsaken wing! However.....studying the floor somewhat closer, we quickly discovered someone newly had trampled on a now half dead spider.....and on the wall vis-à-vis a particular steel door, was fixed an unmistakably active ―spider-orb‖ (ie ―cobweb-eye‖)! Kind of shabby looking, a special security lock had nevertheless been installed on the actual door.....and in the windowless room behind it, two

105 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

middle-aged men watched the machinery producing the expensive —

cobweb-optics! Their closest family truly knew nothing about the cobweb-optics production, and believed their husbands/fathers/sons etc worked as regular industrial engineers for the Telenor company..... The production was closely monitored from a nearby central, and the two engineers had both a Stanford-Binet IQ of 125 ( ie 12 points below corresponding score for the Norwegian Minister of Gross Injustice —). The ―Norwegian plague‖ (ie the cobweb-optics) is now rapidly spreading throughout the world, and we herby encourage the nations to battle this hellborn technology fiercely! A handful moderately gifted but dedicated civil engineers won‘t use many days to find absolutely efficacious methods for detecting and destroying this stygian pest.....so get started! In the meantime you can cover infected spots with oil paint, wallpaper, sheathing or attractive pictures —!

106 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

POSTAL SAFEGUARDING OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMUNICATIONS IN NORWAY Synchronously with steadily growing disrespect for the human rights amongst Norwegian officials, the need to report related violations increases accordingly. Norwegian authorities routinely steals, obstructs, destroys and illegally copies etc jural communications to and from human rights tribunals/organizations AO, and actual complainers ‘ve been incriminated, terrorized, confined, infected/poisoned and — murdered. Vanguarded by the national police force, Norwegian authorities systematically attempts to eradicate all possibilities for transmitting unbiased and wholly lawful reports on human rights conditions and official corruption etc in Norway —; thus special safeguarding of human rights communications to/from Norway is a must! We believe a number of ―Human Rights Post Offices‖ (―HRPOs‖) should be established throughout Norway (— eg in Tromsø, Bodø, Trondheim, Ålesund, Bergen, Stavanger, Oslo and Lillehammer —) to prevent illegal interference from Norwegian authorities. At the actual HRPOs Norwegian citizens et al will deposit their human rights missives against a receipt and appropriate postage and also, of course, sign incoming human rights correspondence out. All HRPOs must be totally independent of Norwegian authorities, and it‘s probably sufficient to man them 1–2 hours a week (in the afternoon/evening, and as far as possible on the same weekday for all offices). Postal matters should be guarded very closely, and brought in/out of Norway by absolutely trustworthy couriers — vg once a week, and preferably on the same 107 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

weekday as the HRPOs are open to the general public. Ideally couriers should be granted — or already possess — diplomatic immunity.

Dec 01, 2004

HELLVOW ANTICORRUPTION (Wilh. Werner WINTHER, President)

108 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Feb 07, 2005

GLOBAL TERMINATION — NORWAY GUILTY — Cf Document #2418 above . Despite austere admonitions Norwegian authorities routinely carries on their truculent and obnoxiously human rights violating terrorization of juridically blameless and otherwise estimable individuals — a few examples:

 February 2004: A Norwegian police officer and murderer utilizing a forged/master key surreptitiously enters the private house of Mr FLD, NO-Mauseidvaag, spreading a contagium disabling said victim. Mr FLD, whom I sometimes visits, is still out of work.

 April 2004: A Norwegian police officer is burglarizing the private garage of Mr Rune SAND, NO-6035 Fiskarstrand. The police had beforehand installed audiovisual etc surveillance accoutrements numerous places inside his private house — e.g in bath-/bedrooms. Mr Sand frequently visits an older brother of Mr Knut M SKOTHEIMSVIK (cf Doc #2418 above).

 December 2004: Norwegian police officers utilizing a forged/master key illegally enters the private house of Amnesty representative Mr Amund HALSEBAKKE, NO-6057 Ellingsøy. Mr Halsebakke and his family has been unlawfully/audiovisually surveilled in their private home by the same, 109 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

police employed criminals suspecting I‘d planned to consult him in human rights matters.

 January 2005: Norwegian police officers burglarizes the company ―Bilhuset‖ item a private house in Haugraasa 14, NO-6036 Mauseidvaag. AV surveillance accoutrements installed both places. Bilhuset is partially owned by one of my cousins, and the house in Haugraasa is inhabited by other relatives. Satanically terrorizing the Lord‘s Servant* (*cf Doc #2037 etc above) for years, Norwegian officials premeditatedly ‘ve committed the most unforgivable of sins.....consequently: God ‘ve decided to destroy planet Earth quite soon. The fact Norwegian authorities ‘ve carried on their unparalleled transgressions wholly aware they utterly could devastate the Earth‘s future, is an absolutely aggravating factor. As the nations of the world realizes they‘re unable to halt oncoming extinction, several of them will attack Norway military. In these last days of the Earth pilots seeking death and revenge will smash their aircrafts into Norwegian public buildings etc with horrendous effect.....and in many Norwegian cities/towns chemical weapons will flow like small creeks in the streets, the ground will be covered with deadly radioactive material and acutely toxic war gases etc will fill the air.....; no country has ever been more thoroughly annihilated military ....neither has any nation destroyed so much for so many as

— Norway — I believe my warnings etc ‘ve been sharp enough in this case — cf Aphorisms ##28, 36, 37, 38, 39, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 63, 64, 68, 72, 79, 80, 84, 89, 91, 98, 99, 102, 111, 112, 115, 116, 119, 123, 126, 128, 130, 134, 135 and 136 etc item Doc‘s ##599, 627, 633, 777, 1022, 1049 and 2037 etc above..... In order to escape vehemently illegal and exceptionally despicable persecution by Norwegian authorities, the author of nearby document applied for political asylum in concordance with Article 14 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights both in 2003 and 2004.

Wilhelm Werner Winther 110 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Johs. A ASPEHAUG, advokat Ålesund 07. april, 2005

FRI RETTSHJELP ETC Oversender gjenpart av en mail jeg forsøkte å nå deg med tidligere i dag (fra [email protected]) — oversendelsen ble blokkert av slimklumpene i politi/lensmannsetaten (brukte en PC hos Haram Folkebibliotek, Brattvåg): ―Hei! Her i Brattvåg har vi stadig og i økende grad problemer med snørrunger fra politi-/lensmannsetaten som bl.a stjeler og saboterer mine private eiendeler. Denne uken (natt til mandag kl 04:15–04:30) hadde man f.eks nok et innbruddsforsøk rettet mot garasjen min i Åsen 4 — to kvisete drittsekker fra politietaten rev løs en låsebolt på garasjedøren, men uten å komme seg inn. Tidligere har svina stjålet en nøkkel til samme garasjen hvor de saboterte en helt ny gressklipper — må kjøpe ny i år (nøkkelen til garasjedøren ble stjålet fra en privatbolig i Mauseidvåg)! Ellers i år har disse satans, uniformerte lakeiene bl.a sabotert en kostbar ‗verdensradio‘, ødelagt ringeklokker, laget massevis av problemer på Internett, bråket med innbrudds-/brannalarmer, terrorisert hedersmennesker mer enn 80 år gamle og klusset med strømforsyningen i Åsen 4 & 7 (Brattvåg).... De har også begått mer enn ett dusin innbrudd etc hos mine venner/slektninger.

111 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Vi får lage en formell klage på disse og noen av de andre forbrytelsene minusvariantene har begått....så du får søke om fri rettshjelp for meg snarest (gi beskjed dersom du trenger underskriften min)! Sivilombudsmannen*/Datatilsynet skal få oversendt en kopi av dette uformelle notatet.‖

Vennlig hilsen

Wilhelm Werner Winther

PS: Tar sikte på å fremme saken for internasjonale tribunaler — her i Norge får man neppe medhold så lenge denne bleikfeite/evneveike trønderklysa er ‗justis‘minister...!‖ *Sivilombudsmann Arne FLIFLET er visstnok kjent som en hederlig kar, men det gjenstår å se om han er tøff, rettsindig og klok nok til å støtte oss i denne spesielle saken. Han skal vite at om han tar opp kampen mot den sykelig perverterte råttenskapen som så ettertrykkelig har infisert bl.a regjeringen, Stortinget og ―visse‖ domstoler, vil han straks — kanskje allerede i dag — bli utsatt for ulovlig og sterkt krenkende overvåkning. Han kan ikke stole på medlemmene i f.eks EOS-utvalget, og blant de møkkete barnerumpene som må straffes i denne saken, finnes utvilsomt bl.a fhv stats-/justisminister Jens STOLTENBERG og Hanne HARLEM. I denne unike saken har bl.a Stortinget/regjeringen utviklet seg til et stinkende ormebol av sinnssyke smådjevler anført av nominelt religiøse rasshøl som f.eks Kjell Magne BONDEVIK og ledelsen i Kristelig Folkeparti.....; det er ingen tvil om at meget harde og utradisjonelle metoder må tas i bruk for å få bukt med den særdeles giftige faenskapen....! Cf: www.geocities.com/wwerner280 112 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Gjenpart:  Sivilombudsmannen v/ Arne FLIFLET, Oslo  Datatilsynet, Oslo

113 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Advokat Johs. A Aspehaug, Ålesund

15. april, 2005

BEGRENSET MEMENTO Mønsteret for den audiovisuelle &c monitoringen av strengt private oppholdsrom i Åsen 4, Brattvåg, undergikk denne uken merkbare endringer —; de politiansatte terroristene prøver nå i større grad enn tidligere å skjule korresponderende overvåkning, og de har — tydelig fordekt — jobbet med å aktivere tidligere unyttede linker for å videreføre trakasseringen. Atferdsendringen kan skyldes at sivilombudsmannen har intervenert, eller at Kjell Magne BONDEVIK 10. ds besøkte Brattvåg. For helt å få slutt på den ulovlige spionasjen, er det imidlertid nødvendig å frata forbryterne alle tekniske muligheter for å utøve den — ―fagre ord og løfter om bot og bedring‖ fra misdederne, må ingenlunde stoles på! Mht sivilombudsmann Arne FLIFLET så er han — som forutsagt i mitt (uformelle) brev av 07. ds — nå satt under absolutt illegal og sterkt foraktelig overvåkning. Hr Fliflet er nok en tøffing det blir vanskelig å kontrollere effektivt, men han bør merke seg at utstrålingen fra f.eks digitale/personlige/portable databanker/adresselister/dagbøker samt kalkulatorer etc med nokså enkelt utstyr kan oppfanges og dekodes på temmelig lang avstand (kfr ―TEMPEST‖). Legger han inn info på mobiltelefonen sin, vil denne oppfanges før eventuell videresending — i det hele bør alt digitalt være ―neiting‖ for ham nå (.....dersom han ikke nytter denne forræderske teknologien til å spre nøye tilsiktet desinformasjon)! 114 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

PST har òg i meget stor grad misbrukt enhver praktisk anledning til å bugge f.eks klær (særlig yttertøy), bagasje og — husdyr! En av hovedmennene i denne saken — teologen Kjell Magne Bondevik, har i lang tid innstendig bedt om å slippe helvetesstraff for sin opplagt forsettlige delaktighet i de bestialske overgrepene. Vel.....; dersom hr Bondevik via sannferdige og fyllestgjørende vitnemål etc aktivt bidrar til at flest mulig av de skyldige i sammenfallende sakskompleks sekulært straffedømmes, har de tallrike bønnene hans knapt vært forgjeves (— av åpenbare grunner bør den eventuelle oppryddingen påbegynnes i god tid før han går av som sjef for regjeringen). Nå får vi se om norges statsminister har ryggrad og vett til å forfekte sannhet & rettferd.....det vil nok lønne seg! Saken for øvrig bærer utvetydig preg av at mange av de skyldige er sinnslidende — dog strafferettslig tilregnelige, og det er liten tvil om at lange sikringsdommer er betimelig når de fleste av disse skal straffedømmes. Det er spesielt forstemmende — men slett ikke uventet — at så mye ‗helse‘personell velvillig har deltatt i de ekstremt graverende og eksplisitt morbide krenkelsene* (*sannsynligvis — pga de mange rikspolitikerne/embetsmennene etc involvert, de verste eksemplene på systematiske menneskerettighetsbrudd i Norge etter annen verdenskrig). Jeg søker ufortrødent om politisk asyl — selv om norske myndigheter (sikkert for å kunne plage meg ytterligere) rutinemessig forsøker å stjele/åpne disse legale petisjonene til utenlandske diplomater oa. Under arbeidet med å forfatte dette begrensede mementoet, har representanter for fienden aktivt lastet ned stoffet på PCene sine.....dette vil ikke hjelpe dem — snarere tvert imot! Redaksjonen avsluttet kl 22:15.

Wilhelm Werner Winther Gjenpart:  Sivilombudsmannen v/ Arne FLIFLET, Oslo  Statsministerens kontor v/ Kjell Magne BONDEVIK, Oslo 115 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Counsellor Johs A ASPEHAUG, Esq Ålesund, Norway April 30, 2005

ILLICIT SURVEILLANCE OF MS INGA DALSEGG (b Dec 14, ‘74) Information particularly useful for Norwegian authorities ‘ve been carefully omitted from adjacent and significantly shortened text. Corresponding victim, Ms Inga DALSEGG (NO-Rindal), is mentioned in Document #599 at www.geocities.com/wwerner280 — the author of nearby note formally engaged her murdered twin sister, Ms Elin DALSEGG, in 1996 (cf Centuries–I:76 and –VI:72 etc in aforesaid Doc). Subsequent to Elin‘s death in 1996, state employed criminals believing there existed a special interrelation between the Dalsegg-twins and me (cf mentioned Centuries) installed AV spy-accoutrements in Inga‘s apartment in NO-Rindal (i.e; she was still living in Leicester, England, when Elin was murdered). Inga‘s customary physician — a middle-aged man she most naively trusted — together with a couple depraved nurses, were hired to operate the cobweb-optics* (*cf Doc‘s ##123, 2037 and 3217 at www.geocities.com/wwerner280) and pinhole-microphones etc. Totally unaware she is closely watched, Inga frequently plays with her sexuality; asshole yawning and genital labia lustfully spread she‘s eagerly mimicking copulation etc to reach her orgasm(-s).....and the sickly perverted Norwegian

116 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

―health‖ professionals are willingly studying her otherwise undistinguished, rectovaginal attributes — finding the frenzied spectacles rather amusing! Later, when meeting her e.g at the local health centre, they all attempt to behave as natural as possible — though, behind her back, they‘re laughing at her lecherousness and inordinate gullibility. The completely illegal and extremely condemnable surveillance of Ms Inga Dalsegg has continued until today, and ‘ve been explicitly approved by, v.g; Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK, Mr Ansgar GABRIELSEN and Mr Odd Einar DØRUM — all members of the Norwegian Government. The stark immorality, pathologic cynicism and life endangering irresponsibility of Mr Paul HELLANDSVIK — the managing director of Helse Midt-Norge* (*Norwegian health care region), are referred to in my applications for political asylum.

All interference from Norwegian authorities in this case ‘ve been unilaterally destructive, invidious, unwelcomed and largely criminal — clearly reflecting the mental illness, habitual double-dealing and emetic disregard for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of man indeed characterizing most of the malefactors. Due to described offences, Ms Dalsegg is advised to apply for political asylum in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in agreement with Article 14 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Regards,

Wilhelm Werner Winther

117 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Place/date: Ålesund/Norway — April

, 2005

TO: ....................................................................... Address line 1: ...................................................................................................... Address line 2: ......................................................................................................

FROM: Surname: WINTHER

First names: Wilhelm Werner

Birthplace/-date: NO-Ålesund — May 17, 1963

Gender: Male

Nationality: Norwegian

Present address: Åsen 4, NO-6270 Brattvåg, Norway

Contact information:

118 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Due to persistent, dangerous and totally illegal harassment and interference from Norwegian authorities, only couriers satisfyingly identifying them-selves as authentic/official representatives of your country are accepted as messengers. No letters should be forwarded through, e.g, the official postal services of Norway (i.e ―Posten Norge BA‖) or DHL. My counsellor in NO-Ålesund, Mr Johs. A ASPEHAUG, can be reached at phone No (+47) 70134545 or fax No (+47) 70134546 — however; no confidential information should be transferred by telecommunication or direct consultation with Mr Aspehaug.....the counsellor is trustworthy enough, but his office ‘ve been unlawfully bugged/surveilled by Norwegian authorities for years! Norwegian authorities are much likely to obstruct phone calls, steal telefacsimiles and erase e-mails etc.

Nearby application is submitted in agreement with Article 14 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — (sic):

―Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries freedom from persecution.‖

FACTS OF THE CLAIM For more than 15 — fifteen — years I‘ve been working actively and altruistically with disclosing severe human rights violations and variform criminality committed by Norwegian officials. My human rights agitation and justifiable stinging reports ‘ve significantly disturbed culpable and heinously corrupted politicians, judges and police officers et al who, consequently, ‘ve done their very best to conceal their offences and to harm me. Representatives from the Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service ‘ve also, several times, attempted to assassinate me — apparently with utterly scandalous assent from v.g the Supreme Court and the Norwegian Minister of ―Justice‖. Due to the umpteen Norwegian statesmen and senior civil servants etc involved in coinciding maltreatment, the nefarious and shockingly extensive crimes 119 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

against me veritably represents the worst examples of systematic and deliberate human rights violations in Norway after the Second World War. The facts of the case, per se, clearly reflects the distressing lunacy characterizing most of the malefactors — though, juridically spoken, they‘re criminally responsible. Amongst the numerous Norwegian officials who unambiguously ‘ve displayed a nauseating degree of stark immorality and damnable, professional irresponsibility in this case, is MD Mr Paul HELLANDSVIK — the managing director of Helse Midt-Norge* (*Norwegian health care region). Mr Hellandsvik‘s pathologic cynicism and factual, criminal activities, acutely violates e.g Article 7 in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights — (sic):

―No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.‖

It‘s perfectly evident the rotten terrorism steadily exercised by Norwegian authorities aims at ruining my general health, mutilating my social relationships, marring my reputation, adding to my pecuniary expenses and — if possible — provoking criminality. My sociomedical situation here in Norway ‘ve been intolerable the last 12 — twelve — years, and I‘ve never had any future whatsoever in a nation satanically persecuting me because I‘m noble, insists on justice and vigorously defends the human rights and fundamental freedoms of man. Shortly; the ghoulish corruption, abject poltroonery and utterly unreason-able fiendishness abidingly brandished by Norwegian authorities in my case, will fill every honorable man and woman with the most intense and enduring contempt and hostility towards them! There‘s no hope my situation here in Norway will improve — on the contrary Norwegian authorities will continue and extend their swinish violations of the human rights, and the exceptionally prolonged, intense and hateful terrorist attacks are doubtlessly strongly detrimental to my health etc. Otherwise a few of the crimes committed by Norwegian authorities are described at www.geocities.com/wwerner280 (please note that I‘ve been deprived 120 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

editorial access to the actual Internet documents etc in connection to an ongoing sham-case here in Norway where Norwegian police officers added methanol to alleged contraband spirits — cf Doc‘s ##1536 [―A FEW COMMENTS TO ABOVE CHRONOLOGY‖] and 2907. It‘s of course vitally important for Norwegian police officers to silence and throw suspicion on any person able to provide conclusive evidence against them in this and many other, criminal cases where the real offenders are police officers).

It should be thoroughly emphasized all criticism of Norwegian authorities is a natural result of — not the reason for — the corresponding and state wielded terrorism. While composing this application, balefully depraved representatives for Norwegian authorities ‘ve been busy downloading corresponding material on their hard disks.....and — profusely empirically; Norwegian authorities will comply with international law and human rights conventions exclusively if forced to by v.g military pressure, serious political scandals or massive fiscal/material/human losses. Moreover; long-standing, ample and bitter experience ‘ve duly confirmed Norwegian authorities object e.g generosity, compassion and mildness as exploitable weaknesses — as a frank invitation to carry on and intumesce their manipulative and explicitly illicit hellishness!

Generally:

A much sterner and significantly more excluding attitude vs Norwegian authorities is a

PREREQUISITE!

121 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

CLAIM In order to escape explicitly illegal and life endangering persecution by Norwegian authorities, I hereby apply for

POLITICAL ASYLUM in .......................................................................................................

in concordance with Article 14 in the

Universal Declaration of Human Rights Needless to say: I‘ll do whatever possible to favorably enhance the general reputation and grandeur of my new homeland!

Sincerely,

Wilhelm Werner Winther

Enclosures: 122 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

1): .......................................................................................................... 2): .......................................................................................................... 3): .......................................................................................................... 4): .......................................................................................................... 5): .......................................................................................................... 6): .......................................................................................................... 7): .......................................................................................................... 8): ..........................................................................................................

123 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

OHCHR–UNOG 8–14 Avenue de la Paix 1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland June 2005

HUMAN RIGHTS PETITION I‘m presently composing a comprehensive United Nations petition vs the Kingdom of Norway. Corresponding complaint is addressed to the Committee against Torture, and demanded dealt with in agreement with Article 21 (c) — second period — in the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment. Employing e.g TEMPEST-equipment, Norwegian authorities are constantly downloading stuff appearing on my PC-screen — consequently they‘ve kicked off a putrid charm campaign to surreptitiously influence v.g the UN and various human rights organizations in this case! Representatives for Norwegian authorities ‘ve already decided to illegally halt etc said petition if it proves too disclosing.....so; I‘m wondering if the UN can offer me special protection against unlawful interference — The UN should send their prompt reply to my counsellor in NO-Ålesund: Mr Johs. A ASPEHAUG, P.O. Box 837, NO-Aalesund, NORWAY

Wilhelm Werner Winther 124 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Amnesty International London, UK

United Nations Geneva, Switzerland Dec 05, 2005

BRUTALIZATION OF CONFLICT WITH NORWEGIAN AUTHORITIES Cf my standardized application for political asylum and letter to OHCHR– UNOG, CH-Geneva, earlier this year. From the content of indicated documents it‘s readily seen continuation/ aggravation of the explicitly illegal terrorism unprovokedly waged by Norwegian authorities indeed was anticipated! As stated in specified UN-document duly arriving corresponding headquarters in Switzerland June 27, Norwegian authorities thoroughly exlex attempts to halt/ destroy etc a legal complaint addressed to the Committee against Torture. The comprehensive petition is demanded dealt with in agreement with Article 21(c) — second period — in the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment. Due to the threatening state of affairs here in Norway, it should be appropriate to give v.g human rights organizations a swiftly composed and concise account of the latest criminal stunts undertaken by Norwegian authorities in this sinistrous case: 125 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

The enemy expecting me to routinely proceed to my sleeping quarters at that time, the water supply to my own and all neighbouring houses was abruptly turned off around 01:30 AM the 03rd inst! — though required by law, no premonition had been announced e.g through the local newspaper ―Haramsnytt‖, and none of those afflicted by the stoppage had otherwise been informed about it..... The water supply weren‘t reopened before ca 09:00 AM.....allegedly because there ‘d been ardent disputation as for the ethicality of poisoning the drinking water of so many guiltless persons! Around 06:20 AM I tried to reach my neighbour in Åsen 7, Brattvåg — Mr Ingolf Peder ABELSETH — from phone 986 62 841.....but the enemy obstructed the calls! Mr Abelseth was wide awake at the actual time, and ‘ve confirmed his otherwise noisy phone — placed less than a meter from his bed — had been perfectly silent this morning. (Mr Abelseth‘s private phone — # 70216138 — has been illegally wiretapped e.g by stark criminal/perverted/psychotic ―health personnel‖ for years.....and the through and through lawless and overly nauseating surveillance of this highly respectable and mentally unimpaired old tailor, also includes covert audiovisual monitoring of his sitting room, kitchen, bath-/bedroom and stairway etc!) In the Norwegian daily ―Dagbladet‖ this Saturday, the Norwegian minister of foreign affairs, Mr Jonas GAHR STØRE (b Aug 25, 1960), had a telltalely mis leading article about Norway‘s ―official point of view‖ etc in various human rights matters. Based on longtime experience with the criminality of Norwegian authorities, we know tactically structured and slyly fraudulent handouts like Mr Gahr Støre‘s populistic tab confect more or less perfunctorily are published immediately prior to

serious human rights violations where there‘s a qualified chance influential persons/ organizations/ companies etc rightfully may suspect

NORWEGIAN OFFICIALS! Mr Gahr Støre (— like the Norwegian PM, Mr Jens STOLTENBERG [b March 16, 1959 —]) has been deeply involved in the fiendish complot against me since 1992, and he‘s one of the Norwegian debauchees who‘ve tried to collect information about me in Paris/France. 126 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Amongst culprits in the Brattvåg-region (not necessarily guilty of sabotaging/ intoxicating the water supply), I preliminary and most briefly mention but a few:  Mr Thorleif MARKEN (former sheriff/politician)  Mr Bjørn SANDNES (engineer/politician/militarist)  Mr Eldar SÆTERØY (engineer etc)  Mr Oddbjørn VATNE ( chairman of Haram county council)  Mr Jan Petter EIDE (manager Haram county council)  Mr Stig FJØRTOFT (local fire captain — married to Ms Jorunn ULSTEIN FJØRTOFT)  Mr Magne LUNDEMO (headmaster — married to Ms Eva LUNDEMO)  Mr Vegard AUSTNES (sociologist)  Mr Ron Borge FINNØY (ambulance driver)  Ms Margrethe TENNFJORD (former chairwoman of Haram county council)  Ms Eva LUNDEMO (unit nursing officer — married to Mr Magne LUNDEMO)  Ms Kristin MOLT KORSNES (unit nursing officer)  Ms Jorunn ULSTEIN FJØRTOFT (cook/politician — married to Mr Stig FJØRTOFT)  Ms Kjellrun HAMMERSLAND (nursing assistant)  Several physicians/nurses/police officers The majority of enlisted criminals are dangerous sociopaths, and a further description of their psychopathy and factual evildoing etc will be published later.

Sincerely,

Wilhelm Werner Winther 127 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

OHCHR–UNOG CH-1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland April 25, 2006

NEW PROVOCATIONS FROM NORWEGIAN AUTHORITIES Employed by local authorities in NO-Haram county to remove private house refuse etc in the Brattvåg-region, the company Reno Norge AS has its head office in Lindebergveien 3, NO-2016 Frogner, and a regional office at Hovdeland 133 – Bingsa Industriområde, NO-6019 Ålesund (the area manager is Mr Leif Ove ANDREASSEN). Stored in special garbage sacks, the household rubbish are picked up by trucks from Reno Norge AS immediately outside private dwellings usw — Garbagemen from Reno Norge AS has recurrently and mala fide refused to take away correctly sorted and stored etc trash sacks placed outside my private house in Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg, as a part of the continuous, illegal, human rights violating and thoroughly insane terrorization Norwegian authorities systematically has exposed me to since 1992 (cf Doc #4588 etc). We believe local representatives from Reno Norge AS has been instructed by fiendish officeholders in NO-Haram county to disregard their duty in this case, and simple investigation has brought home that Mr Stig FJØRTOFT* and Mr Eldar SÆTERØY* (*cf Doc #5817) both were amongst those beforehand informed about described and provocatively intentional dereliction of duty. 128 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Mr Fjørtoft is married to Ms Jorunn ULSTEIN FJØRTOFT* (*cf Doc's ##5817 item 377 — entry of May 13, 1998), and is one of the notorious lunatics and troublemakers villainously abusing their office criminally here in NOBrattvåg to harm me. Mr Fjørtoft has repetitively and malevolently attempted to gain personal information about me from one of my childhood friends — Mr Tore LANGVATN, NO-6090 Fosnavåg (Mr Langvatn is employed as fire captain in NO-Herøy county). An uncouth bloke without noteworthy education and intellectual faculties, Mr Fjørtoft in many respects represents the archetype of the numerous, inane and utterly contemptible "public lowbrows" exerting themselves to quench human rights advocacy, ethicality and justice in nearby case. As regards explicit corruption, professional ineptitude, stark madness and overall heinousness, the state and council engaged terrorists in NO-Haram county clearly and wholly negatively distinguish themselves nationally —

Sincerely,

Wilhelm Werner Winther

129 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Den norske kyrkja v/ Jan Inge KRINGSTAD Brattvåg

AD: RONNY JØRGENSEN, BRATTVÅG Hr Ronny Jørgensen har en tid vært ansatt ved Den norske kyrkja i Haram Prestegjeld. Etter at Jørgensen tilflyttet Åsen 1, Brattvåg, har naboer o.a registrert at han tilnærmet konsekvent nytter søn- og helligdager til tungt og støyende kroppsarbeid i og umiddelbart utenfor korresponderende enebolig. Hr Jørgensens privathus er beliggende tett ved en relativt sterk trafikkert bygdevei hvor forbipasserende knapt kan unngå å se den notoriske kirkegårdsarbeideren kappe fjeler, spikre, bære stein, grave, nytte motoriserte hageredskaper og vaske kjøretøyene sine etc søndagene. Noen av Jørgensens hviledagskrenkelser er vitterlig såpass spektakulære og upassende at han med skjellig grunn kan mistenkes for å undergrave Kirkens alminnelige omdømme forsettlig (jf vedl foto)...! Den norske statskirkens sakrale fundament er for lengst skandaløst svekket av sekulær overstyring og politisering m.m, og Haram Prestegjeld mfl anmodes om å sanere og iaktta Kirkens helligede grunnlag bl.a ved å avskjedige ansatte som med overlegg grovt ringeakter Gudgitte forordninger. Ronny Jørgensen har mot bedre vitende, i lang tid og på særlig graverende vis vanhelliget hviledagspåbudet, og bes straks — uten profane palaver — fratatt ethvert profesjonelt engasjement for Kirken og andre kristelige sammenslutninger! 130 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

03. okt 2006

Wilh. Werner WINTHER*

*Må ikke kontaktes via Posten Norge BA eller DHL!

131 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Biskopen i Møre Julsundv. 13 Molde

PERSONALKLAGE — PÅANKE AV, Viser til personalklage på Ronny JØRGENSEN, Brattvåg, samt korresponderende tilsvar fra kirkeverge i Haram Prestegjeld — Hege STEINSLAND — datert hhv 03. og 23. ds (jf vedlegg). Fr Steinslands nonchalante og megetsigende ansvarsfraskrivelse påankes hermed til biskopen i Møre. Man stiller naturlig nok spørsmålstegn ved fr Steinslands moralske integritet og profesjonelle skikkethet mv, og utelukker ikke at hun i andre og konvergerende saker er involvert i regulær kriminalitet* (*dette gjelder særlig forhold hvor hun på ulikt vis har samarbeidet illegalt med den notoriske yrkesdamnifikanten og psykopaten Vegard AUSTNES, helse-/sosialsjef i Haram kommune). Man finner ingen formildende — kun eksplisitt skjerpende — omstendigheter i klagesaken mot hr Jørgensen, og fremholder at det er formelt korrekt å underlegge Hege Steinsland uhildet/adekvat etterforsking* før hun eventuelt avskjediges som kirkeverge etc (*kommuneadministrasjonen og lensmannsetaten mfl i Haram er gjennomsyret av alvorlig korrupsjon som vil komplisere slikt arbeid).

25. okt 2006 132 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Wilh. Werner WINTHER*

Vedlegg: 1. Personalklage på Ronny Jørgensen av 03. ds (1 – én – s), 2. tilsvar fra Hege Steinsland datert 23. d.m (1 – én – s).

NB: Undertegnede mottar ikke forsendelser fra Posten Norge BA ─ svar sendes:

Jan Inge Kringstad 6270 Brattvåg

133 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Haram kyrkjelege fellesråd v/ Peter Odd BJØRKHAUG, leiar

7. nov 2006

Vatne

PERSONALKLAGE — NY PÅANKE AV, Jf tilsvar fra biskop Odd BONDEVIK samt korresponderende påanke datert hhv 31. og 25. f.m (se vedlegg). I ovennevnte påanke understrekes at "kommuneadministrasjonen og lensmannsetaten mfl i Haram er gjennomsyret av alvorlig korrupsjon" som vil komplisere uhildet/adekvat etterforsking av kirkeverge Hege STEINSLAND, og man finner således symptomatisk at biskop Bondevik fremholder adressat som klageinstans. Det negative inntrykket forsterkes kraftig ved at fr Steinsland er daglig leder, saksbehandler og sekretær for — nettopp — Haram kyrkjelege fellesråd…! Biskopens rolle og myndighet er for en stor del nedfelt i Tjenesteordning for biskop hvor det i § 1 heter at — sic: "Biskopen skal gjennom forkynnelse og sakramentforvaltning ta vare på den apostoliske lære etter Guds ord og vår kirkes bekjennelse, fremme og bevare enheten i Guds kirke og rettlede og oppmuntre bispedømmets menigheter, kirkelig tilsatte og øvrige medarbeidere." Biskopen har et uttrykkelig tilsynsansvar for all kirkelig virksomhet i bispe134 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

dømmet, og skal bl.a påse at de kirkelige fellesrådene utfører sitt arbeid i samsvar med kirkeloven § 28. Klagesaken mot Ronny JØRGENSEN og Hege Steinsland inngår ellers som et kompletterende (— dog taktisk ufullstendig —) norsktekstlig supplement i et langt mer omfattende og alvorlig sakskompleks hvor flere geistlige — deriblant biskopens fetter Kjell Magne BONDEVIK — er strafferettslig involvert. Det er hevet over tvil, dessverre, at Odd Bondevik for mer enn tolv år siden var informert om noen av lovbruddene beskrevet i adressants "INCOMPLETE FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY" av aug d.å, uten at han grep inn for å avgrense eller stoppe den avskyelige kriminaliteten hvori hans navngitte og mentalt forstyrrede søskenbarn var delaktig. Med hjemmel i forannevnte o.a, bes biskop Odd Bondevik snarest underkastet grundig/upartisk etterforsking for å klarlegge hvorvidt han kan straffes f.eks etter straffeloven §§ 123–125 og 324–325. Cf Grunnloven §§ 21–22, tjenestemannsloven § 15 item kirkeloven § 32 mv. Det kirkelige fellesrådet er et kommunalt forvaltningsorgan hvis sammensetning og arbeidsoppgaver bl.a reguleres av kirkeloven §§ 12–14. Rådet er underlagt forvaltnings-/offentlighetsloven som gjelder med unntak av særbestemmelsene i kirkeloven § 38. Av habilitetskravene i forvaltningsloven § 6 fremgår at en offentlig tjenestemann* (*jf §§ 1 og 10 ib) "er ugild til å tilrettelegge grunnlaget for en avgjørelse eller til å treffe avgjørelse i en forvaltningssak" f.eks når han selv er part i saken eller særegne forhold som kan svekke tilliten til hans upartiskhet foreligger. Uten at en her går nærmere inn på skyldspørsmålet og de juridiske implikasjonene av å bidra til en straffbar handling etc, legges til grunn at Det kyrkjelege fellesrådet over tid har kjent til deler av den regulære kriminaliteten man i påanke av 25. f.m diplomatisk antyder at Hege Steinsland kan være involvert i, og at de formelle kravene til straffbarhet og straffeforhøyende omstendigheter på dette og strategisk uspesifisert vis er oppfylt. Medlemmene i Haram kyrkjelege fellesråd er dermed blant de eksplisitt mistenkte i denne saken, og forvaltningslovens inhabilitetsbestemmelser gjelder desisivt — jf § 2 ib, siste punktum, hvor det fastslås at "Et forvaltningsorgan likestilles med privat rettssubjekt ved anvendelse av første ledd dersom organet har samme interesse eller stilling i saken som private parter kan ha." I Håndbok for kirkelig fellesråd 1.2, fremholdes at "Alle kirkelige enheter bygger på soknet som grunnenhet, og i juridiske termer er soknet en 'juridisk person'." Haram kyrkjelege fellesråd har pt følgende medlemmer: 135 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

      

Peter Odd BJØRKHAUG (leder) Andreas HELLEVIK (nestleder) Reidun SÆTER Knut FRISVOLL Michael HOFFMANN Per Inge VIK Oddbjørn VATNE (varaordføreren i Haram er vararepresentant for hr Vatne)

Både Oddbjørn Vatne og hans vararepresentant til Det kyrkjelege fellesrådet, Torleiv ROGNE, er faste medlemmer av administrasjonsutvalget og formannskapet i Haram kommune. Hr Vatne og andre lokalpolitikere/kommuneansatte er for øvrig nevnt i undertegnedes "Document #5817" på en slik måte at det partielt anskueliggjør ovenstående ugildhetsinnsigelser. Mht kirkeverge Hege Steinsland, så har hun tillikemed mange andre velvillig og mala fide medvirket i et morbid renkespill hvor — især — de offentlig ansatte aktørenes immanente uforstand, sinnslidelser og ditto abnorme kriminalitet står sentralt, og man finner ikke saklig grunnlag for å endre anførslene i vedlagte påanke av 25. f.m.

07. nov 2006

Wilh. Werner WINTHER*

Vedlegg:

   

Personalklage på Ronny Jørgensen av 03. f.m (1– én – s), tilsvar fra Hege Steinsland datert 23. f.m (1– én – s), adressants påanke av 25. f.m (1– én – s), tilsvar fra biskop Odd Bondevik datert 31. f.m (1– én – s).

NB: Undertegnede mottar ikke forsendelser fra Posten Norge BA ─ svar sendes:

Jan Inge Kringstad, 6270 Brattvåg 136 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

03. des 2006

Advokat Johs. A ASPEHAUG Ålesund

ORIENTERING Fr Gry Beate MOLVÆR* (*f 16. okt '70), Trondheim, har status som beskrevet i undertegnedes "INCOMPLETE FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY" s 29–30, jf s 22–28 ib. Fr Molvær har på eget initiativ avtalt et møte med ansatte i Haram kommune medio ds, og bedt om fullmakt til å representere meg — formålet er angivelig å sikre elektrisitetsforsyningen til Åsen 4, Brattvåg, som eies av hennes mor. På bakgrunn av fr Molværs anførte fiendestatus og utilbørlige interaksjon med offentlige funksjonærer oa, har jeg naturlig nok avvist ovennevnte anmodning. Fr Molvær ble erklært persona non grata i Åsen 4, Brattvåg, 02. ds. Ettersom jeg årlig søker om politisk asyl for å unnslippe daglig og eksplisitt illegal trakassering iscenesatt av norske myndigheter, finnes tilbørlig at et dertil skikket medlem av Amnesty International etter fullmakt ivaretar den strengt nødvendige og for meg kvalmende kontakten med f.eks Haram kommune.

Med hilsen

Wilh. Werner WINTHER* 137 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

NYTT TERRORANGREP Siden 1992 har Åsen 4, Brattvåg, vært åsted for noen av de mest forrykte og ondsinnede terrorhandlinger som noensinne er begått av norske kommune- og statsansatte. Den 03. mars 2007 drev Wilh. Werner WINTHER — som siden 1993 har bebodd anførte adresse — med malerarbeid i korresponderende privatboligs annen etasje da han fikk besøk av venninnen Kjærsti Elida GUSECK som fortalte at hun nylig hadde vært i håndgemeng med moren grunnet et uavklart eierforhold. Få minutter etter fr Gusecks ankomst oppstod kraftig røykutvikling og muligens åpen ild i husets kjelleretasje idet den elektriske strømforsyningen til denne delen av huset ble angrepet og sabotert av offentlig ansatte som grovt misbrukte tilgjengelig og — i utgangspunktet — militær teknologi. Klokken var på dette tidspunktet ca 17:30, og de aktuelle ødeleggelsene fremgår av det fotografiske bilaget "Enclosure S-82" som inngår i hr Winthers formelle FN-klage og menneskerettsrapport "FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway"* (*dette dokumentet er fortsatt under utarbeidelse). At man tidligere — hhv 13. jun 2004 og 28. okt 2006 — har vært utsatt for lignende sabotasjehandlinger iscenesatt av norske myndigheter, fremgår av FNvedleggene "Enclosure S-80" og "Enclosure S-81". På side 137 i ovennevnte FN-rapport fremgår at ambulansesjåførene i Haram kommune i stor grad har medvirket til den illegale overvåkningen og terroriseringen av innboerne bl.a i Åsen 4, Brattvåg, og det er utvilsomt korrekt å underkaste disse dypt foraktelige utskuddene — samt "visse" og ikke mindre foraktelige politiansatte — grundig etterforskning også i tilknytning til beskrevne branntilløp den 3. ds. 138 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Ambulansesjåførene har tidligere — senest den 14. fm — vist aggressiv glede over antatte nederlag påført fr Guseck, og formodentlig medvirket ansatte i helse- og sosialetaten i Haram kommune til å fremprovosere hennes fars dødsfall* den 29. sep 1992 (*i.e ved omfattende og eventuelt forsettlig feilbehandling). Den notoriske/offentlige kriminaliteten blant ansatte i Haram kommune er for øvrig omtalt i undertegnedes Doc's ##5817, 6009, 6097 og 7011 mv. Man tror at innholdet i noen SMSer fr Guseck og hr Winther utvekslet førstnevnte dato har virket ansporende på gjerningsmennene:

Tekstmelding mottatt fra tlf #908 99 829 — i.e fra fr Guseck — kl 12:16 den 03. mars 2007: "Du har vel begynt m gjerdet til Ingolf tenker jeg. Jeg har vondt i halsen. Har spist mange halslinser i håp om at det hjelper." Svar sendt fr Guseck fra tlf #974 83 483 — i.e fra hr Winther — den 03. mars 2007: "Gjerdet — tja…; grunnet malingen denne uken måtte jeg vaske klær i dag…..og vaskemaskin/tørketrommel går på samme strømkursen som sag & arbeidsbelysning — jeg må nok heller male i dag!"

Ved siden av å påføre ham alvorlige helseskader og merutgifter, har et av hovedmålene for norske myndigheter siden 1992 vært å sabotere hr Winthers inntektsgivende arbeid, boligstandard og personlige relasjoner. Fr Guseck er omtalt på s 120 i FORMAL COMPLAINT (det er hevet over tvil at fhv helse- og sosialsjef i Haram kommune — Vegard AUSTNES [jf Doc 's ##6097 og 7011 etc] — er blant de som har vært godt kjent med og delaktig i den illegale og uvanlig detestable monitoringen osv av fr Guseck o.a), og han hvis gjerde mot betaling skulle repareres — Ingolf Peder ABELSETH — er omtalt i Doc #5817 som utgjør en del av samme FN-klagen. Advokat Johs. A ASPEHAUG, Ålesund, har fullmakt til å politianmelde kriminalitet beskrevet i denne orienteringen på vegne av hr Winther. Dommere o.a som benekter eller på annet vis søker å dekke over anførte kriminalitet mv, skal begjæres siktet/tiltalt/straffet f.eks etter straffeloven §§ 139 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

110, 118, 119, 120, 123, 124, 125, 145, 145 a og 275 — cf §§ 62 og 63 ib, item domstolloven §§ 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 113 og 116 etc.

05. mars 2007

Wilh. Werner WINTHER*

PS: Behandlingen av norske myndigheter i denne saken skal være svært brutal ─ dog ikke lovstridig!

140 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Haram lensmannskontor Knutv. 1 NO-6270 BRATTVÅG

ANMELDELSE AV KRIMINALITET I samråd med advokat Johs. A ASPEHAUG, Ålesund, politianmeldes straffbare forhold omtalt i orienteringen "NYTT TERRORANGREP" av 05. ds — jf straffeprosessloven §§ 223–226. De skyldige begjæres siktet/tiltalt/straffet. Enhver henleggelse medfører ytterligere anmeldelser og korrupsjonsanklager. Alle henvendelser i saken rettes til advokat Aspehaug.

Representanter for norske myndigheter er

PERSONAE NON GRATAE i Åsen 4, 6270 Brattvåg! 07. mars 2007

Wilh. Werner WINTHER 141 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Fylkesmannen i Møre og Romsdal Julsundv. 9 Molde v/ Sosialavdelingen BILAG: Orienteringen "NYTT TERRORANGREP", 03 — tre — sider.

PÅANKE AV VEDTAK SAK NR 07/624 — HELSE- OG SOSIALKONTORET I SULA KOMMUNE, 6030 LANGEVÅG Anken og en engelskspråklig kommentarutgave av denne skal vedlegges en FNrapport om korrupsjon i det norske statsapparatet, og klagen suppleres derfor med informasjon og bemerkninger som ellers ville vært naturlig å utelate. Vedtaket som påankes i medhold av sosialtjenesteloven § 8–6, jf sosialtjenesteloven §§ 2–5 og 8–1 item forvaltningsloven §§ 28–30 etc, har referansenummer 07/624 ved helse- og sosialkontoret i Sula kommune og er undertegnet av Ingunn KALVATN og Bente MÅSEIDVÅG. Klageren, fr Kjærsti Elida GUSECK (f 18. juni 1973), er i ovennevnte rapport omtalt slik — sic: "During most of A 2006 I've had much and predominantly chummy contact with Ms Kjærsti Elida GUSECK (b June 18, 1973). Ms Guseck is a photogenic and rather amatorious primadonna, and the constantly marring PST officers and "health" professionals 've of course criminally downloaded dozens of strictly private photos of her from my PC and corresponding video monitor — also shots of explicitly 142 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 2

pornographic nature...! It goes practically unsaid Ms Guseck's private apartments 've been systematically and massively infected with AV spytech — all her phone conversations 've been recorded, and comprehensive annotations on her intimate privacy journalized.....as a matter of fact Norwegian authorities permanently, illegally and lecherously have monitored the definite bedroom privacy of this half Austrian and sexually attractive lady for years! Official and sexually motivated violations of the palsy-walsy privacy of juridically blameless citizens are extremely commonplace in Norway today, and — to the extent parts of corresponding monitoring are formally/clandestinely logged, Norwegian authorities will go to absolute extremes to give their monstrous criminality the slightest shine of respectability...: — empirically exhaustively fraudulent accusations and the most absurd excuses may be recorded to cover up the principal motive of the scummy surveillance!"

(FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY, side 120–121) I Document #7084, som utgjør en del av same FN-rapporten, kan man lese at — sic: "På side 137 i ovennevnte FN-rapport fremgår at ambulansesjåførene i Haram kommune i stor grad har medvirket til den illegale overvåkningen og terroriseringen av innboerne bl.a i Åsen 4, Brattvåg, og det er utvilsomt korrekt å underkaste disse dypt foraktelige utskuddene — samt "visse" og ikke mindre foraktelige politiansatte — grundig etterforskning også i tilknytning til beskrevne branntilløp den 3. ds. Ambulansesjåførene har tidligere — senest den 14. fm — vist aggressiv glede over antatte nederlag påført fr Guseck, og formodentlig medvirket ansatte i helse- og sosialetaten i Haram kommune til å fremprovosere hennes fars dødsfall* den 29. sep 1992 (*i.e ved omfattende og eventuelt forsettlig feilbehandling). Den notoriske/offentlige kriminaliteten blant ansatte i Haram kommune er for øvrig omtalt i undertegnedes Doc's ##5817, 6009, 6097 og 7011 mv."

& "Fr Guseck er omtalt på s 120 i FORMAL COMPLAINT (det er hevet over tvil at fhv helse- og sosialsjef i Haram kommune — Vegard 143 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 3

AUSTNES [jf Doc 's ##6097 og 7011 etc] — er blant de som har vært godt kjent med og delaktig i den illegale og uvanlig detestable monitoringen osv av fr Guseck o.a), og han hvis gjerde mot betaling skulle repareres — Ingolf Peder ABELSETH — er omtalt i Doc #5817 som utgjør en del av samme FN-klagen." Den sinnssykelige og totalt fordømmelige terroriseringen av fr Guseck gjenspeiler dyptgående ringeakt for internasjonale menneskerettighetskonvensjoner Norge er forpliktet av m.m, og det er ingen tvil om at bl.a forvaltningslovens § 6 om ugildhet må få anvendelse — jf tjenestemannsloven §§ 1, 14–19 og 21, samt straffeloven §§ 12, 58–63, 120, 123–125, 145–147, 179, 185, 189, 194, 200, 201, 204–206, 216–217, 229, 232, 236–237, 242–243, 246–247, 252–253, 257– 258, 266, 294, 372, 384, 387, 390, 390 a., og 392–393 mv. Helse- og sosialkontoret i Sula kommune begrunner patognomonisk avslaget på fr Gusecks søknad om dekning av transport- og lagringsutgifter hos Rekdal Transport AS, Ålesund, med at hun "…har hatt tilstrekkeleg inntekt til å dekke desse utgiftene sjølv…" — men, den egentlige årsaken til refuseringen er nok motivert av helt andre og langt mer foraktelige hensyn enn de økonomiske…:

Siden 24. januar ac har Kjærsti Elida Guseck leid en gammel sokkelleilighet i Geilneset 30, Langevåg, som hun hittil ikke har kunnet tilflytte fordi hennes habengut — møbler/hvitevarer, kjøkkentøy, baderomsinventar, bilder/pyntegjenstander og klær m.m — tilbakeholdes av Rekdal Transport AS da fr Guseck ikke har klart å innfri sine økonomiske forpliktelser overfor firmaet. Nevnte leilighet har uvanlig tykke inner- og yttervegger av massiv betong, og en del av den ligger godt under bakkenivå — selv om nederdrektige representanter for norske myndigheter for lengst har installert mye av det vanlige overvåkningsutstyret sitt der, viser etterretninger at de notoriske drittsekkene har hatt problemer med å overføre både lyd og bilder fra deler av den ca 110 m2 store kjellerleiligheten. Utsiktene til ikke å få utspionere fr Gusecks sexualliv og WC-vaner er naturligvis uutholdelig for de satanisk depraverte psykopatene som i årevis har plaget henne o.a, så det er slett ikke underlig at de ansatte ved ovennevnte helse- og sosialkontor råder henne til å "…finne seg ei mindre og rimelegare leilegheit…" —— !

Psykopatologien og den uhyrlige løgnaktigheten/fariseismen/arrogansen/krimi144 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 4

naliteten osv som for en stor del kjennetegner norske stats- og kommuneansatte, fremholdes utvetydig flere steder i forannevnte FN-rapport — sic: "Studying nearby complaint and adjoining enclosures (cf p 2 — "Comments on disqualification"), reasonable sane and sagacious readers pretty soon will launch an almost inevitable question: "Can the various crimes and atrocities described in this report possibly 've been perpetrated by mentally sound creatures...?" Based on unique, comprehensive and well-structured collections of data on documentable criminality committed by Norwegian officials since 1992, it's quite easy to give a clear-cut answer to that query: "Certainly not.....the ghastly admixture of psychopathies, criminalism, hypocrisy, parvanimity, theomachy, lewdness and fiendishness verily characterizing the cracked personality of most Norwegian officials are, far and away, the worst European and first world example of gross intrapopular depravity and collective insaneness procurable!" Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and wormy diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the infected nation which — befittingly — 've been nicknamed "The Kingdom of Satan"! Although psychiatric ill-health and multifarious impairment of higher cerebral functions are alarmingly common amongst Norwegian officials, the greater part of them tends to be criminally responsible as personality disorders — particularly psychopathy — and various perversions are predominant conditions. The pathologically distorted thought and behavior patterns normally typifying Norwegian public officials and senior civil servants may however — viewed as an endemic phenomenon — partially rupture the commonly accepted boundaries imposed by international norms of disease classification. A genetically rooted and markedly offbeat syndrome symptomatically approaching classical psychopathy and frequently comprising atypical variants of the structural pathology conventionally associated with organic brain diseases, it's hardly unbecoming to introduce the acronym "NPSMS"* — *"Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome" (if more convenient, you may think of NPSMS simply as "Norwegian psychopathy" or "Norwegian folie", of course)...! In Doc's ##633 and 2037 — pp 67 and 95, respectively, I've described a number of NPSMS' more or less pathognomonic symptoms — viz: 145 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 5

Inadequate judgmental ability, imprudence, atelonoesis, rejoice in evildoing, ponerophilia, cruelty, sadism, dysempathy, superiority/inferiority complexes and complemental maladjustment/overcompensation, falsehood, charlatanism, hypocrisy, professional double-dealing, sickly self-assertiveness, arrogance, cantankerousness, megalomania, general lability, willful neglect and violation of ethical norms, criminalism, recidivism, dikephobia, corruptibility, deceitfulness, psychiatric conditions, delusional ideation, religious insecurity/confusion, theomachy, icono-/supericlasm, hamartiophilia, unwarranted suspiciousness/hostility, turncoat mentality, distrustful jingoism, impudence, prevaricated sociability, ergasiomimesis, feigned eunoia, refractoriness, spiteful envy, peevishness, aggression, irritability, anosognosia, gloominess, lecherousness and voyeurism.....etc. The above collection of personality traits and symptoms manifestly typical but not necessarily conclusive of NPSMS, clearly invites to differentiated diagnosing; while the moodiness and fluctuating self-image are amongst the distinguishing features of the borderline personality, the thoroughgoing reality distortion and oftentimes systematic misinterpretation of events exhibited by some NPSMS afflicted individuals are truly archtypical of regular psychoses. The severe, recurrent and wholly intentional misconduct and criminality fundamentally peculiar to NPSMS-villains are closest related to the antisocial personality disorder, however, but are more complex and frequently includes dangerous paranoia, religious delusions and sheer diabolism. In most psychiatric disorders it's relatively uncomplicated to identify some precipitating factors — i.e psychosocial and physical influence in all likelihood triggering the mental derangement. When it comes to the NPSMS it's usually hard to detect decisive, psychotogenic factors — as a matter of fact one may feel slightly ill at ease attempting to discriminate readily observable, morbid features from entirely self-willed and obviously unreasonable evil-mindedness...! Ethically indefensible, evilness purely for the sake of evilness may assuredly be a ponerologically acceptable and ipso facto rational aim in itself (most religious dogmas omitted, of course).....consequently — motive and means appearing practically identical — unprovoked evilness may be seen both as a cardinal symptom and causa sine qua non of the Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome. As regards predisposing factors, genetic endowment and hereditary metabolic, anatomical and physiological insufficiencies in prefrontal cortices, the thalamencephalon, hypothalamus and limbic system may be crucial for the actual onset and subsequent diagnosing of NPSMS. Various somatosensory structures and convergence zones in the 146 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 6

ventromedial prefrontal sector of the brain may be visibly damaged, and dysfunctions of the medial/lateral orbitofrontal circuit, nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum, corpus Luysii and thalamic nuclei are common NPSMS features. Serotonin's neuronal transmitter functions and capability to modulate v.g dopaminergic neurons may be significantly reduced in NPSMS sufferers, and the GABAergic output pathways of neostriatum and globus pallidus tends to be impaired — monoamine based weaknesses and defective interconnections between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior subgenual cingulate cortex and the ventral striatum may be NPSMS indicative. Despite depicted brain abnormalities, many NPSMS-caitiffs are capable of performing just about normally on standard neuropsychological tests — working memory, concentration and the general intelligence seems to be intact... Those unfamiliar with e.g: the bloodcurdling history of medicine; the execrable crimes inspired by physicians/nurses in Nazi Germany; the political role of psychiatrists in diagnosing dissenters/intellectuals as mentally ill; the numerous medical practitioners serving as regular torturers; the many vivisections on various prisoners/internees; the widespread falsification of medical reports to cover up serious crimes; the active involvement of physicians in weapon-related production.....etc.....may find the heinously extensive and untautly described cooperation between corrupted "health" professionals and notoriously criminal police officers (et al) downright shocking and unbelievable. There exist a universally acclaimed and professional code of deontological principles serving as ethical cornerstone for medical teachers and practitioners, namely the "Hippocratic oath"...:

THE ORIGINAL HIPPOCRATIC OATH "I swear by Apollo the physician, and Aesculapius, and Health, and All-heal, and all the gods and goddesses, that, according to my ability and judgment, I will keep this Oath and this stipulation — to reckon him who taught me this Art equally dear to me as my parents, to share my substance with him, and relieve his necessities if required; to look upon his offspring in the same footing as my own brothers, and to teach them this Art, if they shall wish to learn it, without fee or stipulation; and that by precept, lecture, and every other mode of instruction, I will impart a knowledge of the Art 147 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

to my own sons, and those of my teachers, and to disciples bound by a stipulation and oath according to the law of medicine, but to none others. I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous. I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion. With purity and with holiness I will pass my life and practice my Art. I will not cut persons laboring under the stone, but will leave this to be done by men who are practitioners of this work. Into whatever house I enter, I will go into them for the benefit of the sick, and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption; and, further from the seduction of females or males, of freemen and slaves. Whatever, in connection with my professional practice or not, in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought not to be spoken of abroad, I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should be kept secret. While I continue to keep this Oath unviolated, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the Art, respected by all men, in all times! But should I trespass and violate this Oath, may the reverse be my lot!"

THE REVISED HIPPOCRATIC OATH "I promise that my medical knowledge will be used to benefit people's health. Patients are my first concern. I will listen to them, and provide the best care I can. I will be honest, respectful, and compassionate towards patients. I will do my best to help anyone in medical need, in emergencies. I will make every effort to ensure that the rights of all patients are respected, including vulnerable groups who lack means of making their needs known. I will exercise my professional judgment as independently as possible, uninfluenced by political pressure or the social standing of my patient. I will not put personal profit or advancement above my duty to my patient. I recognize the special value of human life, but I also know that prolongation of human life is not the only aim of health care. If I agree to perform abortion, I agree that it should take place only within an ethical and legal framework. I will not provide treatments that are pointless or harmful, or which an informed and competent patient refuses. I will help patients find the information and support they want to make decisions on their care. I will answer as 148 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

25. april 2007 side 7

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 8

truthfully as I can, and respect patients' decisions, unless that puts others at risk of substantial harm. If I cannot agree with their requests, I will explain why. If my patients have limited mental awareness, I will still encourage them to participate in decisions as much as they feel able. I will do my best to maintain confidentiality about all patients. If there are overriding reasons preventing me keeping a patient's confidentiality, I will explain them. I recognize my knowledge has limits: I will get advice from colleagues when needed. I will acknowledge my mistakes. I will do my best to keep myself and my colleagues informed of new developments, and ensure that poor standards or bad practices are exposed to those who can improve them. I will show respect for all those with whom I work and be ready to share my knowledge by teaching others what I know. I will use my training and professional standing to improve the community in which I work. I will treat patients equitably and support a fair and humane distribution of health resources. I will try to influence and redirect authorities whose policies harm public health. I will oppose policies which breach internationally accepted standards of human rights. I will strive to change laws that are contrary to patients' interests or to my professional ethics. While I continue to keep this Oath unviolated, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the Art, respected by all, in all times."

The wholly deliberate and fulsomely imbuing lawlessness, terrorism and nefariousness arrogantly paraded by the Norwegian public "health" service (et al) in this case, represents an all-out and portentously hellish onslaught of the high-minded stipulations laid down in the Hippocratic oath — we are, categorically, facing the worst and most dishonorable example of state supported inequity, official folly and premeditated human rights violations seen in Norway after World War II (cf Doc #4588, p 120)...! A judicious and impartial being may turn over and search underneath each stone and windfall without finding factually extenuating circumstances in this case.....the intensely loathsome picture of an occupational group rapaciously vandalizing their professional code and, in symptomatic confederacy, illegally terrorizing a particularly valiant man opportunistically deemed morally and intellectually superior — and for that reason malevolently persecuted by depraved dunces, incessantly becomes more detailed and horridly scandalous as new pieces of evidence appears. Caveat lector...: 149 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 9

 "...according to my ability and judgment, I will keep this Oath and this stipulation...",  "...I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous...",  "...with purity and with holiness I will pass my life and practise my Art...",  "...into whatever house I enter, I will go into them for the benefit of the sick, and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption...",  "...I will be honest, respectful, and compassionate towards patients...",  "...I will make every effort to ensure that the rights of all patients are respected...",  "...I will exercise my professional judgment as independently as possible, uninfluenced by political pressure or the social standing of my patient...",  "...I will not provide treatments that are pointless or harmful, or which an informed and competent patient refuses...", 

"...I will acknowledge my mistakes...",

 "...I will try to influence and redirect authorities whose policies harm public health...",  "...I will strive to change laws that are contrary to patients interests or to my professional ethics...", and  "...I will oppose policies which breach internationally accepted standards of human rights..." — — ;

150 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 10

it certainly looks glorious on paper and screen, doesn't it...? The revolting truth, however, is that preaching human rights and ethical code observance to Norwegian authorities — the public "health" service vastly included — in this case invariably have had the same, questionable effects as solemnly offering a literally bloody, honeyed and invigorating sacrament to a swarm screwy, hell-ordained and plague-spreading rat fleas…!"

(FORMAL COMPLAINT, s 122-127)

"Preceding quotations clearly reflects much of the cap-à-pie pharisaism and scurvy misconduct wontedly showed off by Norwegian officials attempting to belittle, conceal and obstruct adequate investigation etc of their extensive corruption. To these chronic and obtrusively arrogant malefactors, your adherence to soft-boiled human rights and ethical codes simply means they can protract and possibly intensify their obnoxious offences without risking dismaying sanctions and burdensome, international interference.....verily; your idealistic and perchance pusillanimous approach is nothing but an enheartening incitement to these naturally schizoid and overly low-minded felons! Instead of mollycoddling and inadvertently spurring Norwegian authorities mayheming the human rights, the world community at large and international fora in particular should go for explicitly pragmatic solutions to halt and legally punish corresponding and vaingloriously contemptuous criminality. More precisely, we can imagine a highly specialized, mobile and cosmopolitan intervention unit of superbly fit and comprehensively trained police officers duly commissioned to secure final proofs and forcibly apprehend state supported culprits — e.g in Norway... Principally dedicated to human rights' enforcement rather than conventional counterterrorist tasks, judicious application of cogent measures to prevent abuse of portrayed unit is crucial. In any event — and this point can hardly be overstressed: before international and politically powerful alliances are willing to resolutely and with required sternness arrest, imprison, convict and otherwise treat Norwegian officials in accordance with the categorical condemnation the latter's satanic fiendishness, double-dealing and odious corruption ex officio en effet calls for, the well-meant but woefully uncharged pro forma chiding normally launched by human rights organizations/tribunals scarcely becomes more than a waggish and downright encouraging brutum fulmen to Norwegian authorities...!

151 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 11

More specifically returning to the Norwegian public "health" service, it should be properly emphasized some of the meanest villains hired to routinely and absolutely illegally terrorize me here in NO-Brattvåg neither are physicians nor nurses, but fulsomely rotten ambulance drivers. A fairly homogeneous pack sociopaths and grubby good-for-nothings with a general Stanford-Binet IQ clustered betwixt 118 and 121, three of these befittingly and irrevocably hell-doomed chauffeurs has distinguished themselves by particularly swinish behavior — viz:  Mr Ron Borge "Schizo" FINNØY, NO-Brattvåg,  Mr Torgeir "Rattus" AKSLEN, NO-Brattvåg, and  Mr Kjell-Arne OTTERLEI, NO-Brattvåg. For years on end we've witnessed how this accursed troika and other depraved "health" professionals wholly on their own initiative — or to carry out orders unlawfully sanctioned e.g by Norwegian government/parliament officials — orgiastically and with diabolic delight 've trampled to pieces central articles of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights..."

(FORMAL COMPLAINT, s 136–137) "Generally, state initiated/supported criminality are considerably facilitated and furthered by the fact most commoners lacks reliable and sufficient information about the actual and oftentimes extensive corruption partaken by their authorities…..and those unsuspecting of — and perhaps largely unacquainted with — flagrant evilness and injustice, very easily becomes victims of e.g official propaganda and disinformation designed to create/nourish unjustified confidence and cover up corresponding depravity. Moreover, perverted officials and senior civil servants are also, normally, in a particularly convenient position when it comes to manipulating the press, hiding their malefaction, and evading criminal investigation of — and legal actions against — themselves…..and, here in Norway, they're quite ready to exploit that bothersome fact! So, inferentially; those caring for their personal integrity and condemning said iniquity should — first and foremost — highten their overall suspiciousness vis-à-vis the Norwegian state apparatus (cf PRECAUTION #1 below)."

(FORMAL COMPLAINT, s 156)

152 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 12

"As stressed above, the fatally contaminated Norwegian state apparatus are composed of individuals…and the individual corruptibility and actual depravity of these persons determines — summa summarum — the degree of corruption generally ascribable to Norwegian authorities. While the satanic iniquity of Norwegian authorities are befittingly underscored many places in this Complaint — cf e.g pp 10, 68–69, 72–73 and 104–137 (cf Doc's ##103, 115, 339, 377, 627, 633, 1022, 1536, 2037, 2418, 2907, 3217, 3611, 4000, 4575, 4588, 5007, 5817, 6097, 7011 and 7084 &c), the actual point here, in any case, is that our alertness in no way should be limited to the various parts of the state apparatus per se — our suspiciousness should indeed encompass the corresponding culprits' private activities and circle of acquaintances too. None possessed of an adequate degree of moral integrity, perspicacity and information would nowadays — and voluntarily — work as a senior civil or public servant here in Norway…and, dealing with the actual officeholders, we should always keep in mind we're up against individuals not quitting their despective jobs either because they — for various reasons — feels forced to stay, are unaware serious corruption, are unable to comprehend the nature or implications of their own or others' malfeasance, or because they consciously — sufficiently aware the incriminating/ ponerological/immoral aspects of their misconduct — supports or actively partakes indicated malversation. Although there are multifarious and hitherto undescribed aspects and degrees of the foregoing assertion, the golden rule is never to rely on a Norwegian senior civil servant or official whatsoever…whereas unimpelled employment with and amicable contributions to nowadays Norwegian authorities normally points to dangerous moral/intellectual/informational defects. Regardless of our empirically and otherwise well-founded distrust, we may to a given extent intercommunicate and associate feignedly jovially with the actual officeholders to meet tactical requirements like the gathering, evaluation and spreading of essential intelligence…..in most circumstances, however, it's generally unbecoming to distinctly respectable persons to communicate needlessly and unobliged/volitionally keep company with these authority hired individuals who for preventive reasons should be brusquely denied admittance to all assemblies of zealously upright and sharply discerning men and women. As an absolute debarment of Norwegian officials from all groups of superbly wise and virtuous persons may seem unduly extreme to some of you, I shall spend a few minutes explaining why such radical measures nevertheless are recommendable." 153 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 13

(FORMAL COMPLAINT, s 160–161) Fr Kjærsti Elida Guseck forteller at hun under en barnevernssamtale med Tone Amalie OPSTAD fra helse- og sosialkontoret i Haram kommune tidligere denne måneden ble karakterisert som en "ondskapsfull psykopat" o.a, og at fr Opstad bedyret hun ville anstrenge seg for å skape så mange personlige problemer for henne som mulig. Fr Guseck understreker òg at hun i lang tid har hatt et særlig dårlig forhold til Laila GRYTTEN ved barnevernet i Haram kommune — i den private orienteringen "NOEN ENKLE RETNINGSLINJER" av februar d.å, omtales fr Grytten slik — sic: "Med tanke på hennes antatt perverterte legning — pedofili/lesbisitet — og det faktum at hun aldri har født et barn selv, er det fullstendig uakseptabelt at Laila GRYTTEN besitter sin nåværende stilling innen helse- og sosialetaten…..; slike barnevernsjobber bør, fortrinnsvis, forbeholdes mer enn normalt oppegående mødre som har båret frem og med hell oppdratt minst 2 — to — av sine egne barn!" "Fr Gryttens hyppige og til dels personlige kontakt med ansatte i politi-/ lensmannsetaten skal tillegges stor og udelt negativ betydning — dette gjelder også det påstått "rusforebyggende" arbeidet." "Det er hevet over tvil at Laila Grytten og fhv helse- og sosialsjef i Haram kommune — Vegard AUSTNES* (* jf Doc ##6097 og 7011 &c) — er blant de som har vært godt kjent med og delaktig i den illegale og uvanlig detestable monitoringen av fr Guseck."

Under enhver omstendighet anses bevist at det foreligger et meget alvorlig og enkelt dokumenterbart fiendskap mellom fr Guseck og helse-/sosialetaten både i Haram og Sula kommune, og at førstnevntes harme til gagns er berettiget da sistnevnte instanser o.a har begått uprovoserte, langvarige, særdeles avskyelige og eksplisitt kriminelle overgrep mot henne. Den straffbare terroriseringen av fr Guseck har tydelig preg av renspikket og sinnssykelig personforfølgelse, og man legger til grunn at spesielt de kommunale aktørene i dag nærer et sterkt og kriminelt ønske om å skade henne. Det har helt klart vært hyppig og overveiende konspiratorisk kontakt mellom helse- og sosialkontorene i Haram og Sula kommune i dagene umiddelbart før påankede — og tilsiktet misvisende — vedtak ble fattet, og man finner i så måte symptomatisk at brevsendingen fra Sula kommune inneholdende nevnte vedtak 154 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

25. april 2007 side 14

— som er datert 28. fm — er poststemplet 18. ds* (*i.e datoen den tre uker lange ankefristen normalt utgår)…! Fr Guseck mottok for øvrig omtalte vedtak den 21. ds —— Av forvaltningsloven § 6 fremgår bl.a at — sic: "En offentlig tjenestemann er ugild til å tilrettelegge grunnlaget for en avgjørelse eller til å treffe en avgjørelse i en forvaltningssak når særegne forhold foreligger som er egnet til å svekke tilliten til hans upartiskhet." Med hjemmel i sistnevnte lovparagraf o.a nedlegges slik

PÅSTAND: Vedtaket fra helse- og sosialkontoret i Sula kommune med internt referansenummer 07/624 erklæres ugyldig og omgjøres slik at Kjærsti Elida GUSECK, NO-6282 Brattvåg, snarest får innfridd sine økonomiske forpliktelser overfor Rekdal Transport AS* (*firmaets krav skal i dag lyde på ca kr 18 500,00) — jf forvaltningsloven §§ 28 og 35 mv, item sosialtjenesteloven §§ 1–1, 1–2, 2–1, 8–4, 8–6 og 8–7 etc.

Brattvåg, 25. april 2007

Kjærsti Elida GUSECK (sign.)

155 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

Fylkesmannen NO-Molde

UN-DOCUMENT

Vedlegg: 1. Kopi av søknad om økonomisk stønad fra fr Kjærsti Elida GUSECK av 31. jan d.å, 4 — fire — sider; 2. kopi av vedtak fra helse- og sosialkontoret i Sula kommune med internt referansenummer 07/624, 2 — to — sider; 3. kopi av konvolutten sistnevnte vedtak ble oversendt i, 1 — én — side; 4. kopi av kjøreordre nr 12340 fra Rekdal Transport AS, 1 — én — side.

156 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

25. april 2007 side 15

UN-DOCUMENT

Haram lensmannskontor Knutv. 1 NO-6270 BRATTVÅG

Idet man understreker at vedlagte dokumenter uavkortet inngår i en formell FNklage, politianmeldes alle straffbare forhold omtalt i "Incomplete Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway" (s 1–195) og "Internet Documents" (s 1–156) — jf straffeprosessloven §§ 223–226. De skyldige begjæres siktet/tiltalt/straffet. Enhver henleggelse medfører ytterligere anmeldelser og korrupsjonsanklager. Faren for at norske myndigheter begår nye og alvorlige forbrytelser i denne saken er såpass overhengende, at avhør etc av undertegnede kun tillates på nærmere klarert sted med nøytrale/bevæpnede sikkerhetsvakter fra andre og mer tilregnelige FN-land til stede (jf Grunnloven § 93 mv). Representanter for norske myndigheter er personae non gratae i Åsen 4, Brattvåg. Alle henvendelser rettes til advokat Johs. A ASPEHAUG, Ålesund.

13. august 2007 157 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Wilh. Werner WINTHER BILAG:  Incomplete Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway, s 1–195,  Internet Documents, s 1–156.

158 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Sep 12, 2007 Mr Johs. A ASPEHAUG, lawyer Kipervikg. 5 (Grimmergården) NO-ÅLESUND

Dear Mr Aspehaug: As telephonically stated, a number of Norwegian (senior) civil servants were quite busy here in NO-Brattvåg today as well as the 6th inst; in a couple hours these accursed swine amongst swine provoked acute power failure in Åsen 4 13–14 times…! Similar terror attacks has been formally reported earlier — cf Doc's ##7084 and 7090. As regards my comprehensive report of the 13th previous month (cf Doc #8123), this as well as enclosed documents has been forwarded the thoroughly corrupted chief of police Mr Arne Sverre KAROLIUSSEN, NO-Ålesund. Mr Karoliussen — together with the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Mr Knut STORBERGET — are, of course, amongst the numerous malefactors actual to imprison for the full term and period of their remaining and natural life in this unparalleled case. Mr Karoliussen are very well aware rotten officers from the police station in NO-Ålesund, in cooperation with depraved employees/executives at the head post office in the same town, has stolen several letters from e.g human rights organizations addressed to your office — cf Incomplete FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 1, 10 and 179, item Doc #3611 &c. 159 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Closing nearby letter at 07:06 post meridiem, those guilty of described criminality immediately sabotaged my PC deleting all text usw…! Very truly yours,

Wilh. Werner WINTHER

PS (Sep 14, 2007): Before handing over nearby letter, I shall make mention of a dubious device extensively and criminally abused by the public "health" service in Norway; the "Antenna Carephone" (see illustrations below). The Antenna Carephone is strategically installed in private domiciles by representatives of the public "health" service, and connected to a day and night manned central through the state-owned telecommunication network* (*cf Doc #3217, pp 105–107 &c). Frequently stationed in living rooms, kitchens, and near beds, the Antenna Carephone provides excellent opportunities for illegally overhearing/recording various indoor activities…..and, as demonstrated by practically innumerable incidents the last quinquennium, these "Carephones" are systematically abused by odiously corrupted "health" personnel eavesdropping private conversations and sexual activities etc! Those abusing the Antenna Carephone here in NO-Brattvåg has — mostly — been female nurses living out their psychosexual disorders and criminal predisposition.

160 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Haram lensmannskontor Knutv. 1 NO-6270 BRATTVÅG

Undertegnede lånte 20. ds en Mercedes Vito varebil med reg.nr UF 23543 av firmaet Brabil AS i Strandgata, Brattvåg. Natt til 21. ds — mens bilen stod parkert utenfor garasjen i Åsen 4, Brattvåg — brøt politiansatte seg inn i bilen. Man antar at de politiansatte under innbruddet tappet varebilen for noen liter drivstoff. Man antar òg at politiansatte dagen i forveien — da bilen stod parkert i Ålesund sentrum mens anmelderen samtalte med sin advokat Johs. A ASPEHAUG — saboterte bilens nærlys (begge sider)… De skyldige begjæres siktet/tiltalt/straffet — jf straffeprosessloven §§ 223– 226. Enhver henleggelse medfører ytterligere anmeldelser og korrupsjonsanklager. Faren for at norske myndigheter begår nye og alvorlige forbrytelser i denne saken er såpass overhengende, at avhør etc av undertegnede kun tillates på nærmere klarert sted med nøytrale/bevæpnede sikkerhetsvakter fra andre og mer tilregnelige FN-land til stede (jf Grunnloven § 93 mv).

161 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

Representanter for norske myndigheter er personae non gratae i Åsen 4, Brattvåg. Alle henvendelser rettes til advokat Johs. A ASPEHAUG, Ålesund.

25. september 2007

Wilh. Werner WINTHER

162 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

October xx, 2007

FORMAL NOTIFICATION OF STATE SUPPORTED CRIMINALITY The sheriff office Knutv. 1 NO-6270 Brattvåg

FOREORDAINED CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE AND PREMEDITATED DERELICTION OF DUTY August 13 HA the sheriff office in NO-Brattvåg duly received a formal notification encompassing all criminal acts mentioned in the UN-petition Incomplete FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway (pp 1–195) and INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner Winther (pp 1–156), and — precisely as expected — Norwegian authorities has mishandled said report and carried on their slimy criminality (cf FORMAL COMPLAINT pp 10, 104– 106, 122–127, 136 and 190 &c, item Doc's ## 8168 and 8197). Whereas section 11 a. of the Norwegian Public Administration Act of February 10 1967 positively states that a public administration body should provide a provisional reply if an inquiry/application etc not can be dealt with within a month, Norwegian authorities — despite several admonitions — arrogantly and wholly deliberately has chosen to violate their own national regulations by denying to acknowledge receipt of the actual notification. Anyhow; the police station in NO-Ålesund — headed by the dreadfully depraved duo Mr Endre FLATVAD and Mr Arne Sverre KAROLIUSSEN 163 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

(cf Doc ##240 and 8168), are legally obliged to follow up any formal complaint reaching them ex officio and in compliance with Norwegian law. The premeditated dereliction of duty in this case are clearly punishable in accordance with e.g sec's 324 and 325 of corresponding Penal Code* — viz:

§ 324. Any public servant who intentionally omits to perform an official duty, or who otherwise intentionally violates his official duties, or who, in spite of warnings, shows carelessness or negligence in the performance of such duties shall be liable to fines or loss of office. Any person who is covered by the Act relating to civil servants shall also come under this section.

§ 325. Any senior state official or public official shall be liable to fines who 1. shows gross lack of judgment in the course of his duty, or 2. performs any act that he is forbidden to do because of his position, or 3. in the performance of his official duty is guilty of improper conduct towards any person, or 4. in connection with his service is guilty of improper conduct towards any of his superiors or subordinates, or 5. in connection with his service behaves in a manner which will make him unworthy of or will have an adverse effect on the confidence or esteem necessary for his office. In the case of repeated offences or under especially aggravating circumstances the penalty applicable may be loss of office.

Cf sec's 14, 15, 16 and 21 of the Norwegian Civil Service Act* — viz:

SECTION 14 Senior civil servants (other than judges) and civil servants who are not by Statute subject to another disciplinary au164 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

thority may be subjected to disciplinary measures for: infringement of official obligations or failure to fulfil official duties, improper behaviour in or outside of the service that damages the respect or confidence essential to the post. As disciplinary measures, senior civil servants and civil servants may be subjected to a written reprimand, or to loss of seniority for a period of one month to two years. Civil servants may also as a disciplinary measure, either permanently or for a limited period be demoted to a lower grade. An ordinary service reprimand shall not be regarded as a disciplinary measure. Disciplinary measures are entered in the officer's record or personnel card. Regulations stipulate when the entry shall be removed. Any officer may demand a printout of his/her record or personnel card.

SECTION 15 A senior civil servant or civil servant may be summarily discharged when he: has shown gross negligence in the service or is guilty of a gross breach of official duties or despite a written warning or reprimand has repeatedly breached his official duties, by improper behaviour in or outside the service proves himself unworthy of his post or damages the respect or confidence that is essential to the post. The provision in this section shall not restrict the right to punish a senior civil servant or civil servant by depriving him of his post pursuant to the rules of penal legislation.

SECTION 16 If dictated by the interest of the service, a senior civil servant or civil servant may immediately be suspended when there are grounds for suspecting that he is guilty of behavior that may result in a summary discharge pursuant to section 15. When such grounds no longer exist, the suspension shall be terminated. A suspension shall also be terminated if instituted criminal prose165 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

cution is discontinued or if a summary discharge case brought before a court of law is withdrawn. Suspension shall also be terminated if a summary discharge is not decided within six months. If however prosecution is instituted for behavior which may give grounds for summary discharge pursuant to section 15, or which may entail punishment by loss of office, or if a civil action has been brought to deprive an officer of his post pursuant to section 10 of the Act concerning the Entry into Force of the Norwegian Penal Code, the suspension may be extended by up to six months at a time until the case is finally decided. The suspension may also be extended by up to six months at a time if the senior civil servant or civil servant has a position of especial trust such that it would be detrimental to the service if he resumed work before the decision of the court or if he would be in a position to destroy evidence needed for decision of the summary discharge case. If a decision is made to suspend an officer, the summary discharge case shall be brought without undue delay. Instead of being suspended, civil servants and senior civil servants in government offices, in the armed forces or the Foreign Service may temporarily be transferred to another, less confidential service. For such transfers the same rules apply as for suspension. Until a decision has been made concerning summary discharge, a suspended senior civil servant or civil servant is entitled to full pay for the post. If the decision is appealed against, the officer is entitled to full pay for the post until the appeal is decided. Deductions may be made from the officer's pay in respect of any income received from other work during the suspension period.

SECTION 21 If a senior civil servant or civil servant is subjected to disciplinary measures or summary discharge for a criminal offence, this shall not preclude normal criminal prosecution, but assessment of the sentence shall take the disciplinary measures or summary discharge into consideration. Whereas my counselor, Mr Johs. A. ASPEHAUG (NO-Ålesund), sent me a SMS* (*Short Message Service) Oct 26 informing me his office had received a confirmatory note four days earlier stating that my notification of Aug 13 ha finally had been forwarded to the Special Police Investigation Commission* (*SEFO) in NO-Kristiansund (cf Doc‘s ##135, 147, and 161 etc), nearby notification — though valid — is left unfinished. Nov 14, 2007

166 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

UN-DOCUMENT

November 06, 2007

FORMAL NOTIFICATION OF STATE SUPPORTED CRIMINALITY The sheriff office Knutv. 1 NO-6270 Brattvåg NORWAY

SUBSEQUENT CRIMES ARE FORMALLY REPORTED: Oct 27, 2007: At 20:49 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities attempted to infect my PC with a particularly nocuous variant of the virus ―Downloader‖. The attack was forcibly quenched, and the virus is now safely quarantined.

Oct 28, 2007: In the afternoon representatives of Norwegian authorities launched an aggressive attack aimed at ruining my PC. The attack is discovered immediately and effectively quashed. 167 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

November 06, 2007

168

Nov 01, 2007: Between 09:00 and 10:15 PM — while (utilizing my PC in Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg) editing and printing out 4 private photos sent my family by relatives in the USA, representatives of Norwegian authorities downloaded and stole ELINTcopies of said pics. The US citizens photographically depicted in this case may all, empirically, be exposed to illegal persecution/surveillance and potentially fatal attacks carried out by depraved representatives of Norwegian authorities.

Nov 03, 2007: Between 10:00 and 11:00 AM — while I visited the shop "RS Elektronikk AS" in NO-Brattvåg, a debauched representative of Norwegian authorities (a middleaged man) annoyed me with aggressive exclamations and impolite behavior. Between 04:00 and 05:20 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities actively obstructed my Internet access (phone # +4792078613), and repeatedly sabotaged official human rights documents opened off-line in the program "Microsoft Word".

Those guilty of described crimes should all be legally charged/sentenced/punished. Due to the numerous/unprovoked/illegal and intentionally life-endangering attacks masterminded and dastardly carried through by Norwegian (senior) civil servants since 1992 (cf "FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway" by Wilh. Werner WINTHER), Norwegian authorities are denied personal contact with me — juridical questioning actively supervised by armed and UN-appointed guards from trustworthy Member States may be allowed though, cf the Norwegian Constitution Article 93*: *―In order to safeguard international peace and security or to promote the international rule of law and cooperation between nations, the Storting may, by a three-fourths majority, consent that an international organization to which Norway adheres or will adhere shall have the right, within objectively defined fields, to exercise powers which in accordance with this Constitution are normally vested in the Norwegian authorities, although not the power to alter INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

168

November 06, 2007

169

this Constitution. For the Storting to grant such consent, at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting shall be present, as required for proceedings for amending the Constitution. The provisions of this Article do not apply in cases of membership in an international organization, whose decisions only have application for Norway purely under international law.‖

Representatives of Norwegian authorities are personae non gratae in Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg. Norwegian authorities should address all requests/remarks etc to my lawyer in NO-Ålesund, Mr Johs A ASPEHAUG.

Sincerely,

Wilh. Werner WINTHER

PS: It's especially discreditable — but not at all surprising — the hereinabove reported crimes took place after I last month officially demanded the Norwegian Prime Minister Jens STOLTENBERG, the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Knut STORBERGET, and several members of the Norwegian Supreme Court (inter alios) duly summoned before a competent Court of Impeachment....cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 86 and 87*:

*Article 86 The Court of Impeachment pronounces judgment in the first and last instance in such proceedings as are brought by the Odelsting against Members of the Council of State, or of the Supreme Court or of the Storting, for criminal offences which they may have committed in their official capacity. INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

169

November 06, 2007

170

The specific rules concerning indictment by the Odelsting in accordance with this Article shall be determined by law. However, the limitation period for the institution of indictment proceedings before the Court of Impeachment may not be set at less than 15 years. The permanent Members of the Lagting and the permanently appointed Members of the Supreme Court are judges of the Court of Impeachment. The provisions contained in Article 87 shall apply to the composition of the Court of Impeachment in the particular case. In the Court of Impeachment the President of the Lagting shall preside. Any person sitting in the Court of Impeachment as a Member of the Lagting shall not resign from the Court if the period for which he is elected as a representative to the Storting expires before the Court of Impeachment has concluded the trial of the case. If he ceases, for any other reason, to be a Member of the Storting, he shall resign as a judge of the Court of Impeachment. The same applies if a Justice of the Supreme Court, who is a Member of the Court of Impeachment, retires as a Member of the Supreme Court.

*Article 87 The accused and the person acting on behalf of the Odelsting in the proceedings have the right to challenge as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as will leave remaining fourteen Members of the Lagting and seven Members of the Supreme Court as judges in the Court of Impeachment. Each party in the proceedings may challenge an equal number of the Members of the Lagting, although the accused has the preferential right to challenge one more, if the number to be challenged is not divisible by two. The same shall apply to the challenging of the Members of the Supreme Court. If there are several accused in such proceedings, they exercise the right of challenge collectively in accordance with rules prescribed by law. If the right of challenge is not exercised to the extent permitted, as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as are in excess of fourteen and seven respectively retire following the drawing of lots. When the case comes up for judgment, as many judges of the Court of Impeachment shall retire following the drawing of lots that the Court due to render judgment is left with fifteen Members, of whom at most ten are Members of the Lagting and five Justices of the Supreme Court. The President of the Court of Impeachment and the President of INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

170

November 06, 2007

171

the Supreme Court shall in no case retire following the drawing of lots. If the Court of Impeachment cannot be composed of as many Members of the Lagting or of the Supreme Court as prescribed above, the case may nevertheless be tried and judgment rendered, provided that the Court numbers at least ten judges. Specific provisions as to the procedure to be followed in the composition of the Court of Impeachment shall be laid down by law.

In any case — let me, finally, quote a few lines from FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway, p 136: "Preceding quotations clearly reflects much of the cap-à-pie Pharisaism and scurvy misconduct wontedly showed off by Norwegian officials attempting to belittle, conceal and obstruct adequate investigation etc of their extensive corruption. To these chronic and obtrusively arrogant malefactors, your adherence to soft-boiled human rights and ethical codes simply means they can protract and possibly intensify their obnoxious offences without risking dismaying sanctions and burdensome, international interference.....verily; your idealistic and perchance pusillanimous approach is nothing but an enheartening incitement to these naturally schizoid and overly low-minded felons! Instead of mollycoddling and inadvertently spurring Norwegian authorities mayheming the human rights, the world community at large and international fora in particular should go for explicitly pragmatic solutions to halt and legally punish corresponding and vaingloriously contemptuous criminality. More precisely, we can imagine a highly specialized, mobile and cosmopolitan intervention unit of superbly fit and comprehensively trained police officers duly commissioned to secure final proofs and forcibly apprehend state supported culprits — e.g in Norway... Principally dedicated to human rights' enforcement rather than conventional counterterrorist tasks, judicious application of cogent measures to prevent abuse of portrayed unit is crucial. In any event — and this point can hardly be overstressed: before international and politically powerful alliances are willing to resolutely and with required sternness arrest, imprison, convict and otherwise treat Norwegian officials in accordance with the categorical condemnation the latter's satanic fiendishness, double-dealing and odious corruption ex officio en effet calls for, the well-meant but woefully uncharged pro forma chiding normally launched by human INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

171

November 06, 2007

172

rights organizations/tribunals scarcely becomes more than a waggish and downright encouraging brutum fulmen to Norwegian authorities!"

PPS: Above notification was properly handed over to the sheriff office in No-Brattvåg the 7th inst, and a few hours after it had been written down on my PC the 6th inst my Internet connection suddenly and permanently broke down (phone #: [+47] 92078613, IP address: 89.8.158.77, Internet provider: the Norwegian company ―NetCom‖)...! In this connection it may be highly appropriate to call attention to the fact I — the 5th inst — visited web sites like:  UNDP Anti-Corruption Practitioners Network, http://anticorruption.undp.sk (at 20:20 CET),  Transparency International, http://transparency.org/ (at 20:24 CET),  Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO), http://coe.int/t/dgt/Greco/Default_en.asp (at 20:25 CET),  Anti Corruption Gateway for Europe and Eurasia, http://65.246.131.134/en.default.asp (at 20:27 and 20:34 CET),  WJIN Guide World Justice Information Network, http://www.wjin.net (at 20:38 CET),  A Global Forum Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity, http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/econ/integrity/homepage.htm (at 20:42 CET). I did also, Nov 5th ha, add more than 10 UN-/COE-addresses to my private Yahoo! Mail contacts ([email protected]).....and, in view of the stark illegal and massive trouble Norwegian authorities has taken to obstruct and corrupt all legal contact with e.g human rights organizations earlier in this case, it‘s quite likely the mere appearance of said addresses has scared the sinful daylights out of the explicitly mischief-happy cops surveilling my Internet activities and thus triggered a new offense.... like — sabotaging my Internet connection! INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

172

173

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

173

174

FORMAL NOTIFICATION OF STATE SUPPORTED CRIMINALITY DATE: May 01, 2008

SUBJECT:  Formal complaint against the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions,  criminal proceedings against members of the Norwegian Council of State, the Norwegian Supreme Court, the Norwegian Parliament, AO.

FROM: Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER, NO-6270 Brattvåg, Norway.

TO: The Norwegian King in Council of State, NO-Oslo, Norway.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

174

175

THROUGH: The Sheriff Office, NO-6270 Brattvåg, Norway.

REMARKS: Nearby notification is an integral part of the official United Nations petition FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER, and may consequently encompass comments and information otherwise natural to omit in this kind of legal documents. Whereas there‘s an imminent danger of new and potentially mortiferous attacks carried out or underhandedly planned by representatives of Norwegian authorities, judicial examination of the appellant in casu are acceptable insofar as — and only if — the interrogation whereabouts are duly approved and supervised by armed/neutral guards conscientiously appointed and directed by the appropriate authorities of significantly healthier and more upright nations than Norway. Norwegian authorities should address all correspondence to counsellor Johs. A. ASPEHAUG, P.O Box 837, 6001 Ålesund. Representatives of foreign governments, human rights organizations, international tribunals — etc — should apply couriers satisfyingly identifying themselves as authentic messengers. No letters should be forwarded through the official postal services of Norway or DHL. Representatives of Norwegian authorities are personae non gratae in Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg.

REFERENCES: a) FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY* (*hereafter referred to as ―FOCO‖) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1–217,

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

175

176

b) INTERNET DOCUMENTS* (*hereafter referred to as ―INDO‖) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1–173, c) letter 108/08-63/ROS004 dated Jan 29 HA from the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH (NO-Oslo); 1 page, d) letter 070630/200700587 dated Feb 02 HA from the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters (NO-Hamar); 1 page, e) e-mail of Oct 28, 2007, from Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER to the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters, The Norwegian Supreme Court, the Norwegian Prime Minister, the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, AO; 1 page.

IN RE: Let‘s make it perfectly plain already now; The addressee of this legal notification — the Norwegian King and his Council of State — are among the absolute main culprits in the criminal case incident to the various atrocities and human rights violations &c described in FOCO/INDO....: “Before kicking off the from A to Z daffy and lawless terror-campaign against me in Oslo, Ms Aase Svendsen Roland and her deranged partners in crime collusively obtained operational permission from e.g the Norwegian Parliament, Government, Supreme Court and King‘s Council.....!‖ (cf FOCO, p 30) ―Ms Harlem Brundtland and her mafiosi in turn presented the disastrous complot for the Norwegian monarch, Mr Harald HEADLESS, who spitefully approved the insanities in the usually hebdomadal Council of State.‖ (cf FOCO, p 31) ―In 1992 Mr Harald HEADLESS (cf p 31) willingly sanctioned the stark illegal and doubtlessly cracked conspiracy against me, and since then he and his nearest INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

176

177

family ‘ve exhibited particular and — to me — wholly undesirable interest for my personal undertakings. The criminal inclination, unfairness, grave disrespect for the human rights and general ignominy persistently displayed by the official royal family of Norway in this case, clearly excludes friendly and even diplomatic relations with them (cf Aphorisms ##135, 136 and 137 etc). It should also be called attention to the disgraceful fact Harald Headless‘ father, King Olav V, had one of his faithful employees incarcerated and maltreated at a state controlled bedlam exclusively because he championed the human rights of other and unseemly hounded/exploited courtiers.....‖ (cf FOCO, pp 68–69) ―Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and wormy diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the infected nation which — befittingly — 've been nicknamed ‗The Kingdom of Satan‘!‖ (cf FOCO, p 122) ―Studying Article 1 of the Norwegian Constitution, we learn that Norway is a limited and hereditary monarchy. The present monarch — King Harald V the Headless (cf pp 31 and 68–69), was born the 21th of February 1937, and formally swore the oath specified in Article 44 of the Norwegian Constitution Feb 21, 1958. Mr Headless, upon the death of his father, took office as Norwegian head of state January 17th 1991, and officially swore the oath laid down in Article 9 of the Norwegian Constitution four days later. To those acquainted with the innate corruptibility, judgmental maladroitness and psychopathological temperament prevalent amongst Norwegian senior civil servants and officials (cf pp 122–124 above), it should be no surprise to find essential parts of the Norwegian Constitution going on the rocks right from the start…..‖ (cf FOCO, p 169) ―In any event King Harald V the Headless most flagrantly has violated the oaths laid down in Article 9 and Article 44 of the Norwegian Constitution — he has repetitively and mala fide sanctioned and awarded the most serious and dishonorable examples of state supported rottenness and premeditated human rights violations ever seen in modern Norway (cf pp 31, 68–69 and 126 etc), and his regal malversation are intensely disgraceful and totally condemnable indeed.‖ (cf FOCO, p 170) ―The downright corruption and hell-destined iniquity abidingly displayed by Norwegian magistracy in juxtaposed facts of nearby case, are unparalleled in

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

177

178

modern monarchic history of law, and execrable diabolism and gangrenous ghoulishness interosculates their exceedingly opprobrious criminality.‖

(cf INDO, pp 1–2) ―The Kingdom of Norway have intentionally, profusely and extendedly acted in a manner extremely deleterious and discreditable for the IHF and its various members — particularly if the obnoxious crimes and premeditated violations of contractual provisions are accepted without adequate execution of sentence.‖ (cf INDO, p 67)

Studying above excerpts it should be entirely evident the Norwegian King and his corrupted council are thoroughly incompetent when it comes to adjudging anything at all in this case, and that‘s about — quoad hoc — precisely the conclusion arrived at in FOCO, pp 8–9: ―On account of preceding observations, it‘s evident all instances/persons mentioned beneath the heading “Accused” in nearby complaint are entirely disqualified from exercising any degree of judicial authority in this case.....; they‘re those legally reported/charged, and should be treated as suspects. However — Norwegian authorities may correctly apply Article 93 in their Constitution (sic): ‗In order to safeguard international peace and security or to promote the international rule of law and cooperation between nations, the Storting may, by a three-fourths majority, consent that an international organization to which Norway adheres or will adhere shall have the right, within objectively defined fields, to exercise powers which in accordance with this Constitution are normally vested in the Norwegian authorities, although not the power to alter this Constitution. For the Storting to grant such consent, at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting shall be present, as required for proceedings for amending the Constitution. The provisions of this Article do not apply in cases of membership in an international organization, whose decisions only have application for Norway purely under international law.‘ Norwegian authorities are hereby encouraged to fulfill their juridical obligations as stated above and entrust impartial representatives from the United Nations with the formal responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating etc the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are charged in this legal case unique in Norwegian history of law.‖ INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

178

179

As regards the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr TorAksel BUSCH (b Mar 17, 1950), he‘s formally and directly subject to the Norwegian King in Council of State. Mr Busch is the head of the Norwegian Prosecuting Authority* (*cf the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec‘s 55 and 56), and he‘s not subordinate to any government department per se — though, as the Council of State largely is composed of ministers acting in their capacity as political supremos of their respective government ministries, many of his decisions ex officio are explicitly marked by departemental influence. Directly beneath the Director General of Public Prosecutions, we find the regional public prosecutors superintending the activities of their respective police districts in Norway.....and it should be emphasized that Mr Busch — and most public prosecutors — has a past as regular police officer(-s).....and, as for the Norwegian police force, quite a few and highly apposite remarks has beforehand been put on paper: ―While 90% of regular Norwegian police officers has clearly marked, psychopathic personality traits, the actual prevalence of explicit psychopathy/sadism are 100% amongst the Norwegian Police ‗Security‘ Service officers.‖ (cf FOCO, p 10) ―The seemingly irresistible urge to compensate for assorted shortcomings through stark falsehood and extensive nefariousness, soon turned out as one of the foremost hallmarks of these fundamentally vicious ruffians....‖ (about officers from Majorstua Police Station in NO-Oslo, cf FOCO p 16) ―The police schemed provocations — which far and away may be more comprehensive, enduring and truculent than actually described above — may nevertheless be constructed, timed and intensified suchwise as to bring about other and more pernicious outcomes than unjustified psychiatric internment and stigmatizing alone.....and — in this connection — the most attractive of the alternative end results is to carry on and worsen the methodical terrorism until the victim attacks and hopefully kills an innocent person in pure desperation. Other frequently sought "payoffs" includes suiciding (the police may v.g surreptitiously and specifically manipulate the regular broadcasting reception playing songs/melodies on the victim's radio and/or television units exacerbating sadness and praising self-destruction), physical handicapping (may be induced e.g through intoxication, covert radiation and various accident setups), or simply — assassination.” (cf FOCO, pp 114–115)

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

179

180

―By and large brimming over with decayed sickees and back-alley jimcrowists, the Norwegian state apparatus just about plenary may go to truly astonishing lengths to actively support and safeguard against public exposure serious criminality committed by their police officers and assorted socii criminis, and various mass media — private as well as state owned — are very likely to reflect this inglorious fact!‖ (cf FOCO, p 115) ―It is certainly in the cards the Norwegian police almost exclusively attracts notorious badasses and psychopaths wholly unfit to assume any sizable degree of responsibility (cf pp 104–121), and — as a matter of fact and course; 2000 of the worst policemen/-women in active service should be locked up straightaway (the overall treatment of these prisoners should be extraordinary harsh indeed), and another 3000 of these chronic malfeasants summarily fired (hard-core criminals who can be sentenced and enjailed somewhat later without seriously endangering the noncriminal population should, due to overcrowded nuthouses and penitentiaries etc, be assigned to this category) — remaining personnel, chiefly minor lawbreakers and incurable sociopaths, should be very closely superintended and permanently excluded from the national police force whenever practically feasible to supplant them with morally and otherwise competent persons!‖ (cf FOCO, pp 155–156) ―Since 1998 the statesmen-approved and intentional abuse of audiovisual spy-tech in Norway ‘ve exploded, and vice-ridden police officers are now picklocking private living quarters all over this condemned kingdom to lecherously spy upon persons they find sexually attractive, or to terrorize human rights activists and intellectuals blaming official corruption. The moral crap constituting the general body of Norwegian Government officials and the national police force, quickly realized that the combination of piccolo microphones and cobweb-optics was a valuable ally when it came to evade legal actions against themselves. Hence and consequently: — virtually always and wheresoever in this country respectable people prepare for criminal persecution of rotten politicians, chiefs of police, judges, district recorders or public prosecutors &c, foul police sergeants are called out to audiovisually supervise the complainants, to audio-/videotape all essential conversations/happenings, and to copy/photograph/steal/hamper/falsify/annihilate every item of evidence plus the sum of documents relating to the case — cf Article 25:1 in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms!” (cf INDO, p 61) INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

180

181

―Norwegian police has for years actively collected information about the pathogenic effects of bodily/mental stress and torture, and they‘ve villainously surveilled and persecuted real psychiatric patients in their private homes while tentatively exploring techniques inflicting various degrees of disability.‖ (cf INDO, p 85) ―As for Norwegian police officers, you‘ll get a tolerably accurate picture of their mentality etc by studying the various documents above — item My aphorisms. Nevertheless — the striking attempts Norwegian police officers has made to infiltrate vg humanitarian/charitable, political and health related organizations etc in order to further professional influence, should be emphasized. Unfortunately members of such coalitions may be easily duped, as many of them are naturally caritative, idealistic and unbiased — characteristics the police officers, wholly undeservingly, wish to be professionally associated with.....‖ (cf INDO, p 97) ―Ad nauseam we‘ve witnessed how Norwegian police officers expediently perpetrates and provokes grave criminality exclusively to ride high on the confusion and fear thereby produced. Besides, aposematically liberticidal bureaucrats opportunistically championing gross injustice steadfastly goosesteps towards the totalitarian, Norwegian police state.....and in major respects the democratic government system has proven ruefully deficient.‖ (cf INDO, p 102) ―Deposit your money in a savings bank, and receive interests; save negative criticism of the Norwegian police, and get your due profit in hell!‖ (cf Aphorisms &c, #26) ―No disaster so grave — no circumstances so terrifying, that interference from Norwegian police not will aggravate the situation considerably!‖ (cf Aphorisms &c, #28) ―Lend the Norwegian police a willing hand: dig your own grave, pay the undertaker, set fire to the cross, curse justice violently, praise the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 and administer the poison yourself listening to the national anthem!‖ (cf Aphorisms &c, #45)

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

181

182

―It‘s written in Luke 4:5–7 that the kingdoms of the world belongs to the Devil — and sure enough: ample experience ‘ve confirmed that the Kingdom of Norway indeed is ruled by Satan.....that the Norwegian authorities vanguarded by the national police force are his loyal disciples worshipping evildoing, deceiving the general population and terrorizing those righteous (cf Matthew 15:8–9 and Isaiah 29:13)!‖ (cf Aphorisms &c, #48) ―Wherever in Norway there‘s a police station you‘ll find a satanic temple and diabolic stronghold!‖ (cf Aphorisms &c, #51) ―Norwegian police officers will normally take great pains to get all relevant facts of the corruption case against them on the table — before throwing the entire stuff to the dogs, assassinating the chef-à-cuisine, falsely accusing the butler and closing down the whole restaurant for purported ‗health care reasons‘!‖ (cf Aphorisms &c, #67) ―Law-abiding Norwegians should forthright join forces — fully prepared to protect themselves and suffering fellowmen against the rampageous criminality of Norwegian police officers!‖ (cf Aphorisms &c, #98) ―It‘s not entirely proper to say the Norwegian Police ‗Security Service‘ lacks responsibility, care, generosity and culture.....whereas they‘re positively responsible for villainously assassinating dozens of guiltless persons, and empirically shows marked care while generously spreading their pernicious bacteria cultures in your private house and car (Cf Aphorism #45 etc)!‖ (cf Aphorisms &c, #110)

Referring to FOCO, the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions is categorically listed amongst those accused in this case (cf p 2), and Mr TorAksel Busch is — moreover — explicitly named on p 34: ―Supporting the psychotic complot against me from the onset, the office of the Director General of Public Prosecutions was headed by Mr Georg Fr. RIEBER-MOHN and Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH.‖

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

182

183

As evident from Document #8123 (cf INDO, pp 157–158), FOCO constitute an essential part of — and is enclosed with — corresponding report dated and duly handed over to the sheriff office in NO-Brattvåg Aug 13 last year. In his letter of Jan 29th HA (cf ref ―c‖) Mr Busch symptomatically evades references to said report of Aug 13, while — tellingly — calling attention to my letter of Sep 12 and formal notification of Nov 06, 2007 (cf INDO, pp 159–160 and 167–172, respectively). Indicated negligence is not casual, of course, and it should be underscored that FOCO is unambiguously mentioned in both documents referred to by Mr Busch (cf INDO, pp 159 and 168, respectively). Mr Busch has certainly been fully aware FOCO as well as INDO was part and parcel of and — as clearly indicated — enclosed with the legal reports in question.....so, in effect — there‘s no doubt about it; the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-Aksel Busch, has mala fide and ex officio acted manifestly contrary to the formal disqualification rules he‘s professionally bound to obey. Examining Mr Busch‘s reasons for breaking the law in the present case, we should pay close attention to the fact two of the persons he attempts to acquit — Mr Jens STOLTENBERG and Mr Knut STORBERGET — both are members of the King‘s Council*: *―The Council of State (cf Article 12 of the Norwegian Constitution) — or ‗King's Council‘ (cf pp 30–31 above) — normally consist of the Norwegian King en personne, the Prime Minister, the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Local Government and Regional Development, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister of Defence, the Minister of Environment, the Minister of Petroleum and Energy, the Minister of International Development, the Minister of Trade and Industry, the Minister of Transport and Communications, the Minister of Education and Research, the Minister of Labour and Social Inclusion, the Minister of Justice and the Police, the Minister of Children and Equality, the Minister of Culture and Church Affairs, the Minister of Health and Care Services, the Minister of Government Administration and Reform, the Minister of Agriculture and Food, the Minister of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs, and the administrative head of the Office of the Prime Minister functioning as the Council's secretary. The various members of the Council of State represents the political core of the Norwegian Government, and the nation's highest administrative authority are correspondingly vested in the King's Council (cf Article 3 of the Norwegian Constitution). Said minister councillors acts in their capacity as political supremos of their respective government ministries — e.g the Ministry of Justice and the Police or the Ministry of Health and Care

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

183

184

Services, and more or less subordinate to these ministries we find a conglomerate of directorates and different administrative organs.‖ (cf FOCO, p 170)

As it appears from FOCO, p 02, leading members of the Norwegian Council of State as well as principal representatives of corresponding royal house are amongst those explicitly culpable/accused in this case…..so, in consequence: Mr Tor-Aksel Busch is Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg‘s and Minister of Justice Knut Storberget‘s particeps criminis* (*cf p 182 above). This fact naturally sheds light on Mr Busch‘s lawbreaking…..: he‘s quite simply — wholly on his own initiative or on orders from political executives — backing up his partners in crime! Of intrinsic interest and juridal importance, certain aspects of Mr Busch‘s modus operandi in this case should be elucidated somewhat further: Referring to my letters of Sep 12 and Nov 06 last year, Mr Busch launches an altogether ludicrous attack on the actual facts of the case — he writes (translated from Norwegian, cf ref ―c‖): ―…..it appears that the alleged and criminal offence is attributable to Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, Minister of Justice Knut Storberget, and chief of police Arne S. Karoliussen (Sunnmøre police district).‖ Now, in the first instance, let‘s take a further look at my formal notification of Nov 06, 2007* (*cf INDO, pp 167–172). The notification is addressed to the sheriff office in NO-Brattvåg, and introductorily runs as follows:

“SUBSEQUENT CRIMES ARE FORMALLY REPORTED: Oct 27, 2007: At 20:49 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities attempted to infect my PC with a particularly nocuous variant of the virus ‗Downloader‘. The attack was forcibly quenched, and the virus is now safely quarantined.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

184

November 06, 2007

185

Oct 28, 2007: In the afternoon representatives of Norwegian authorities launched an aggressive attack aimed at ruining my PC. The attack is discovered immediately and effectively quashed.

Nov 01, 2007: Between 09:00 and 10:15 PM — while (utilizing my PC in Åsen 4, NOBrattvåg) editing and printing out 4 private photos sent my family by relatives in the USA, representatives of Norwegian authorities downloaded and stole ELINT-copies of said pics. The US citizens photographically depicted in this case may all, empirically, be exposed to illegal persecution/surveillance and potentially fatal attacks carried out by depraved representatives of Norwegian authorities.

Nov 03, 2007: Between 10:00 and 11:00 AM — while I visited the shop ‗RS Elektronikk AS‘ in NO-Brattvåg, a debauched representative of Norwegian authorities (a middle-aged man) annoyed me with aggressive exclamations and impolite behavior. Between 04:00 and 05:20 PM representatives of Norwegian authorities actively obstructed my Internet access (phone # +4792078613), and repeatedly sabotaged official human rights documents opened off-line in the program „Microsoft Word‘.”

Indicated notification of Nov 06 ends suchwise: ―Above notification was properly handed over to the sheriff office in NoBrattvåg the 7th inst, and a few hours after it had been written down on my PC the 6th inst my Internet connection suddenly and permanently broke down (phone #: [+47] 92078613, IP address: 89.8.158.77, Internet provider: the Norwegian company ―NetCom‖)...! In this connection it may be highly appropriate to call attention to the fact I — the 5th inst — visited web sites like:

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

185

186

 UNDP Anti-Corruption Practitioners Network, http://anticorruption.undp.sk (at 20:20 CET),  Transparency International, http://transparency.org/ (at 20:24 CET),  Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO), http://coe.int/t/dgt/Greco/Default_en.asp (at 20:25 CET),  Anti Corruption Gateway for Europe and Eurasia, http://65.246.131.134/en.default.asp (at 20:27 and 20:34 CET),  WJIN Guide World Justice Information Network, http://www.wjin.net (at 20:38 CET),  A Global Forum Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity, http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/econ/integrity/homepage.htm (at 20:42 CET). I did also, Nov 5th ha, add more than 10 UN-/COE-addresses to my private Yahoo! Mail contacts ([email protected]).....and, in view of the stark illegal and massive trouble Norwegian authorities has taken to obstruct and corrupt all legal contact with e.g human rights organizations earlier in this case, it‘s quite likely the mere appearance of said addresses has scared the sinful daylights out of the explicitly mischief-happy cops surveilling my Internet activities and thus triggered a new offense.... like — sabotaging my Internet connection!‖

To begin with one call attention to the irrefutable fact Mr Stoltenberg, Mr Storberget, and Mr Karoliussen has been described as the actual perpetrators of the crimes chronologically referred to in my notification of Nov 06 precisely nowhere — said document contains nothing whatsoever pointing to a direct/performatory connection between indicated/reported crimes and this loathsome troika! Moreover; studying the nature of corresponding crimes we immediately notes that these — with a single exception — are directly and explicitly linked with PC usage and Internet related undertakings, and the only persons expressively coupled with and more or less forthrightly accused of sabotaging these activities are “....the explicitly mischief-happy cops surveilling my Internet activities....” (cf foregoing section, item INDO p 172)!

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

186

187

It sticks out a mile that Mr Busch — wholly on purpose — endeavours to obscure the facts of the case by establishing a fictive/operational and demonstrably nonsensical link between reported crimes and aforementioned triad, and his fraudulence becomes even more manifest on account of the fact Mr Stoltenberg and Mr Storberget — still referring to my formal notification of Nov 06 last year — both are unmistakably mentioned in conjunction with a demand for criminal proceedings against them AO submitted before commented offences actually took place: ―It's especially discreditable — but not at all surprising — the hereinabove reported crimes took place after I last month officially demanded the Norwegian Prime Minister Jens STOLTENBERG, the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Knut STORBERGET, and several members of the Norwegian Supreme Court (inter alios) duly summoned before a competent Court of Impeachment....cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 86 and 87*:‖ (cf INDO, p 169)

The fact quoted paragraph is appended to the notification in question as a mere postscript scarcely makes Mr Busch‘s obvious efforts to confuse the facts of this case less conspicuous...! If examining the other of my documents referred to by Mr Busch — the formal complaint of Sep 12 previous year, one finds that corresponding text is straightforward and very difficult to misunderstand (translated from Norwegian): ―Hereby all criminal acts mentioned in enclosed letter dated DD and addressed to counselor Johs. A ASPEHAUG, Ålesund, are formally reported to the police — cf the Criminal Procedure Act sec‘s 223–226.* Those guilty should be charged/sentenced/punished.‖

*The actual letter to counselor Aspehaug (cf INDO, pp 159–160) runs suchwise:

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

187

188

―Sep 12, 2007 Dear Mr Aspehaug: As telephonically stated, a number of Norwegian (senior) civil servants were quite busy here in NO-Brattvåg today as well as the 6th inst; in a couple hours these accursed swine amongst swine provoked acute power failure in Åsen 4 13–14 times…! Similar terror attacks has been formally reported earlier — cf Doc's ##7084 and 7090. As regards my comprehensive report of the 13th previous month (cf Doc #8123), this as well as enclosed documents has been forwarded the thoroughly corrupted chief of police Mr Arne Sverre KAROLIUSSEN, NO-Ålesund. Mr Karoliussen — together with the Norwegian Minister of Justice and the Police Mr Knut STORBERGET — are, of course, amongst the numerous malefactors actual to imprison for the full term and period of their remaining and natural life in this unparalleled case. Mr Karoliussen are very well aware rotten officers from the police station in NO-Ålesund, in cooperation with depraved employees/executives at the head post office in the same town, has stolen several letters from e.g human rights organizations addressed to your office — cf Incomplete FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway pp 1, 10 and 179, item Doc #3611 &c. Closing nearby letter at 07:06 post meridiem, those guilty of described criminality immediately sabotaged my PC deleting all text usw…!‖

As one sees, the corrupted chief of police Mr A S Karoliussen and the Norwegian Minister of Justice (and the Police) Mr K Storberget are specifically mentioned in a distinct section of the letter where they — unequivocally and exclusively — are linked with my report of Aug 13, 2007, and the thereto enclosed documents* (*i.e: ―Incomplete FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway‖ pp 1–195, and ―Internet Documents‖ pp 1–156). Before winding up our modest expatiation on Mr Busch‘s deliberate attempts to corrupt essential facts of this grievous case, one call attention to the fact he has mentioned my report of Sep 25 last year absolutely nowhere in his inculpating letter of Jan 29, HA. INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

188

189

Said report was correctly handed over to Haram Sheriff Office (NO-Brattvåg) the 25th of Sep 2007, and described sabotage of and theft from one of my rental cars. Decisively attributable to Norwegian police officers, we may — rather reasonably — imagine that Mr Busch found it tactically convenient to pass over indicated crimes in ―suggestive silence‖....! It‘s altogether unnecessary to provide additional proofs testifying to Mr Busch‘s premeditated and definitely illegal obfuscation of facts in this case, whereas the documentary evidence hitherto presented comfortably enables us to draw the following and peremptorily justifiable

CONCLUSION: Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH, born March 17 1950, has in his capacity as Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions premeditatedly and in explicitly aggravating manner obstructed lawfull execution of justice by intentionally corrupting essential facts of the present case and mala fide suppressing information he positively knew was all important as regards e.g unbiased criminal investigation of corresponding offences. In light of established facts and manifest implications it‘s beyond all question Mr Busch in order to evade legal prosecution of himself and his accomplices entirely willfully has committed a number of procedural errors aimed at (v.g); falsifying the genuine cause of action, impeding impartial securing/submission/examination of evidence, and — generally — covering up a most offensive array serious crimes directly ascribable to Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants. Mr Busch‘s obnoxious malversation ex officio is certainly not limited to this specific case, and it behooves absolutely to carry out a meticulous and wholly unbiased expert examination of every single case he has dealt with in an official capacity from 1981 to 2008 included. Particular attention should be paid to Mr Busch‘s highly conspicuous interaction with the Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service* (*cf FOCO, pp 104–121 &c) after 1984 and down to this very day, and his professional relations with Mr Lars FRØNSDAL* (*cf FOCO, pp 73–74) has — by the way — been rather ―offbeat‖ most of the time...! With reference to this matter one should bear in mind that Assistant Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Hans-Petter JAHRE, in May 2001 was formally reported to the Norwegian King in Council of State — ipsissima verba:

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

189

190

―Hans-Petter Jahre, Esq, was appointed accessary Director General of Public Prosecutions by the King‘s Council on Jan 09th 1998, and has ex officio recidivistic and arrogantly disgraced his office by extensive and intentional malversation — particularly in civil proceedings and formal complaint connections where the suspected party and accused persons were police employees, senior state officials or, otherwise, public servants. Mr Jahre‘s absolutely unacceptable irresponsibility and loathsome corruption are clearly manifested in his letter/decision of the 04 th prev m (cf enc‘s A, N, O, P, R & S) where he — without criminal investigation — drops notifications encompassing v.g;



premeditated homicides, attempted murder and complicity to manslaughter/-slaying (cf enc‘s B, C, D & Q),



gross vandalism, burglary, illicit search/seizure and aggravated thefts (cf enc‘s C, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, N, O & P),



comprehensive/systematic corruption, forgery, misdemeanor/felony and extensive dereliction of duty (cf enc‘s B, C, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R & S),



false accusations, illegal deprivation of liberty and unlawful detention in custody (cf enc‘s F, G & H),



torture/molestation, illegitimate monitoring/surveillance, defamations, assaults and breach of precedents item duty of secrecy (cf enc‘s B, C, E, F, H, I, L, Q & R).

I refer to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Articles 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19 and demand Hans-Petter Jahre, Esq, immediately suspended/dismissed from his present office in accordance with the Civil Service Act sec‘s 15, 16 and 17 — cf sec 6 ib item the Constitution sec 22 and the Criminal Procedure Act sec 56 etc.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

190

191

Mr Jahre should, without delay, be subjected to independent criminal investigation/proceedings and charged/sentenced in agreement with Norwegian law.‖ (cf INDO, pp 4–7)

Mr Jahre is a notorious police aficionado, and in INDO p 104 we find this passage: ―It should be underscored that the recent chief of the Norwegian ‗Security Service‘ Police, Mr Jørn HOLME, is Mr Dørum‘s former secretary. Mr Holme has also worked as a senior public prosecutor for the National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime in Norway — ‗Økokrim‘, and thus is a former colleague of vg Mr Hans-Petter JAHRE (cf Doc #115 above) and Mr Anstein Birger GJENGEDAL (cf Doc #377 above — entry of Oct 26, 2000).‖ Returning to Mr Tor-Aksel Busch and the criminal proceedings against him, it‘s perfectly clear his professional corruption are punishable in accordance with a good many sections of the Norwegian Penal Code. There are a number of aggravating circumstances to be considered, and Mr Busch‘s putrid decision of Jan 29 HA (cf ref ―c‖) is most certainly invalid — cf the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec‘s 60, 314, 342, 343, 384, 385 and 390–392, the Norwegian Public Administration Act sec‘s 1, 2, 6 and 41, item the Norwegian Courts of Justice Act sec‘s 106–121 etc. As regards Mr Busch‘s disqualification and criminality ex officio, the Norwegian King in Council of State are — according to the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec 64 — supposed to handle these matters, and Article 22 of the Norwegian Constitution reads: “The Prime Minister and the other Members of the Council of State, together with the State Secretaries, may be dismissed by the King without any prior court judgment, after he has heard the opinion of the Council of State on the subject. The same applies to senior officials employed in government offices or in the diplomatic or consular service, to the highestranking civil and ecclesiastical officials, commanders of regiments and other military formations, commandants of forts and officers commanding warships. Whether pensions should be granted to senior officials thus dismissed shall be deterINTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

191

192

mined by the next Storting. In the interval they shall receive two thirds of their previous pay. Other senior officials may only be suspended by the King, and must then without delay be charged before the Courts, but they may not, except by court judgment, be dismissed nor, against their will, transferred. All senior officials may, without a prior court judgment, be discharged from office upon attaining the statutory age limit.” Cf the Norwegian Civil Service Act sec‘s 15 and 21 (cf FOCO, pp 166–168):

SECTION 15 A senior civil servant or civil servant may be summarily discharged when he: has shown gross negligence in the service or is guilty of a gross breach of official duties or despite a written warning or reprimand has repeatedly breached his official duties, by improper behaviour in or outside the service proves himself unworthy of his post or damages the respect or confidence that is essential to the post. The provision in this section shall not restrict the right to punish a senior civil servant or civil servant by depriving him of his post pursuant to the rules of penal legislation. SECTION 21 If a senior civil servant or civil servant is subjected to disciplinary measures or summary discharge for a criminal offence, this shall not preclude normal criminal prosecution, but assessment of the sentence shall take the disciplinary measures or summary discharge into consideration. Anyhow — seeing that an independent and impartial tribunal is sine qua non in respect of a fair trial, lodging an appeal to the Norwegian King in Council of State scarcely stands to reason at all in this case….whereas the very conspiracy against me was enthusiastically approved by indicated monarch in person as well as his vicious councillors (cf FOCO, pp 31 and 68–69 etc)! All decisions drawn up by the Norwegian King in Council of State should be recorded in accordance with regulations, and telling comments on the plot against INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

192

193

me has been found in a special protocol reserved for matters which the King‘s Council has decided to keep secret — cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 30 and 31 (cf FOCO, pp 163–164): ARTICLE 30 All the proceedings of the Council of State shall be entered in its records. Diplomatic matters which the Council of State decides to keep secret shall be entered in a special record. The same applies to military command matters which the Council of State decides to keep secret. Everyone who has a seat in the Council of State has the duty to frankly express his opinion, to which the King is bound to listen. But it rests with the King to make a decision according to his own judgment. If any Member of the Council of State is of the opinion that the King's decision conflicts with the form of government or the laws of the Realm, or is clearly prejudicial to the Realm, it is his duty to make strong remonstrances against it, as well as to have his opinion entered in the records. A Member who has not thus protested is deemed to have been in agreement with the King, and shall be answerable in such manner as may be subsequently decided, and may be impeached by the Odelsting before the Court of Impeachment. ARTICLE 31 All decisions drawn up by the King shall, in order to become valid, be countersigned. The decisions relating to military command are countersigned by the person who has presented the matter, while other decisions are countersigned by the Prime Minister or, if he has not been present, by the highest-ranking Member of the Council of State present.

Not only has the Norwegian King Harald V sanctioned the illegal conspiracy against me with his personal signature, but he is — in all likelihood — entirely unentitled to occupy the Norwegian Throne as well (cf FOCO, pp 169–170)…! And….moreover; whereas the Norwegian King is possessed of a full-scale Stanford-Binet IQ ominously below the absolute minimum requirement for judges/experts (cf FOCO pp 9, 85 and 145–152), his judicial authority should be firmly rejected on that score too (with a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 137, also the Norwegian PM Mr Jens Stoltenberg fails to meet the recommended and INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

193

194

corresponding noometric minimum score of 140 — cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 12, 13 and 31 etc). At all events Norwegian authorities — the King‘s Council included — are obliged to comply with the following Articles of the  Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,  Universal Declaration of Human Rights,  International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:*

CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS

Article 13: Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.

Article 14: The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.

Article 17: Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

194

195

Article 18: The restrictions permitted under this Convention to the said rights and freedoms shall not be applied for any purpose other than those for which they have been prescribed.

THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-selfgoverning or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law. INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

195

196

Article 10: Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 28: Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29 (3): These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30: Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS

Article 2 (1): Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

196

197

Article 2 (3): Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes: (a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; (b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; (c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.

Article 3: The State Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set forth in the present Covenant.

Article 5 (1): Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.

Article 5 (2): There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

197

198

Article 14 (1): All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The Press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice; but any judgement rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children.

Article 16: Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 26: All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

*(In section 2 of the Norwegian ―Human Rights Act‖ of May 21, 1999, it is explicitly laid down that the Council of Europe‘s ―Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms‖ [the ―European Convention on Human Rights‖], the ―Universal Declaration of Human Rights‖ as well as the United Nations‘ ―International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights‖ are fully applicable as Norwegian law, and in sec 3 ib it‘s brought home that provisions confirmed through conventions and protocols mentioned in sec 2 in case of controversy are prior to other legislation.)

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

198

199

In this connection one call particular attention to the Norwegian Constitution Article 110 c: “It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State to respect and ensure human rights. Specific provisions for the implementation of treaties hereof shall be determined by law (cf, vg, the Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999 — sec‟s 2 and 3).”

Cf FOCO, pp 3–8 etc.

Studying above excerpts from various human rights conventions, it becomes even clearer the Norwegian Council of State totally lacks the judicial power and authority to hear and determine any thing whatever in this case (cf pp 176–178 above etc)....; corresponding councillors should most determinedly be seated in the dock — they‘re in all respects the malefactors, and by no means the adjudicators! It appears from the Norwegian Constitution Article 30 that members of the King‘s Council may be impeached by the Odelsting before the Court of Impeachment (cf p 193 above), and in this connection it should be appropriate to take a look at Articles 49, 71, 73–81 and 86–87 ib:

Article 49 The people exercises the Legislative Power through the Storting, which consists of two departments, the Lagting and the Odelsting.

Article 71 The members of the Storting function as such for four successive years.

Article 73 The Storting nominates from among its members one fourth to constitute the Lagting, the remaining three fourths to constitute the Odelsting. This nomination shall take place at the first session of the Storting that assembles after a new General Election, whereafter the Lagting shall remain unchanged at all sessions of the Storting assembled after the same election, except insofar INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

199

200

as any vacancy which may occur among its members has to be filled by special nomination. Each Ting holds its meetings separately and nominates its own President and Secretary. Neither Ting may hold a meeting unless at least half of its Members are present. However, Bills concerning amendments to the Constitution may not be dealt with unless at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting are present.

Article 74 As soon as the Storting is constituted, the King, or whoever he appoints for the purpose, shall open its proceedings with a Speech, in which he shall inform it of the state of the Realm and of the issues to which he particularly desires to call the attention of the Storting. No deliberations may take place in the presence of the King. When the proceedings of the Storting have been opened, the Prime Minister and the Members of the Council of State have the right to attend the Storting, as well as both departments of the Storting, and, like its Members, although without voting, to take part in any proceedings conducted in open session, while in matters discussed in closed sessions only insofar as permitted by the Ting concerned.

Article 75 It devolves upon the Storting: a) to enact and repeal laws; to impose taxes, dues, customs and other public charges, which shall not, however, remain operative beyond 31 December of the succeeding year, unless they are expressly renewed by a new Storting; b) to raise loans in the name of the Realm; c) to supervise the monetary affairs of the Realm; d) to appropriate the moneys necessary to meet government expenditure; e) to decide how much shall be paid annually to the King for the Royal Household, and to determine the Royal Family‟s appanage which may not, however, consist of real property; f) to have submitted to it the records of the Council of State, and all public reports and documents; g) to have communicated to it the conventions and treaties which the King, on behalf of the State, has concluded with foreign powers; h) to have the right to require anyone, the King and the Royal Family excepted, to appear before it on matters of State; the exception does not, however, apply to the Royal Princes if they hold any public office; INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

200

201

i) to review the provisional lists of salaries and pensions and to make therein such alterations as it deems necessary; j) (repealed) k) to appoint five auditors, who shall annually examine the State Accounts and publish extracts of the same print, for which purpose the Accounts shall be submitted to the auditors within six months of the end of the year for which the appropriations of the Storting have been made, and to adopt provisions concerning the procedure for authorizing the accounts of government accounting officials; l) to appoint a person, not a member of the Storting, in a manner prescribed by law, to supervise the public administration and all who work in its service, to assure that no injustice is done against the individual citizen; m) to naturalize aliens.

Article 76 Every Bill shall first be proposed in the Odelsting, either by one of its own Members, or by the government through a Member of the Council of State. If the Bill is passed, it is sent to the Lagting, which either approves or rejects it, and in the latter case returns it with appended comments. These are taken into consideration by the Odelsting, which either shelves the bill or again sends it to the Lagting, with or without alteration. When a Bill from the Odelsting has twice been presented to the Lagting and has been returned a second time as rejected, the Storting shall meet in plenary session, and the bill is then decided by a majority of two thirds of its votes. Between each such deliberation there shall be an interval of at least three days.

Article 77 When a Bill passed by the Odelsting has been approved by the Lagting or by the Storting in plenary session, it is sent to the King, with a request that it may receive the Royal Assent.

Article 78 If the King assents to the Bill, he appends his signature, whereby it becomes law. If he does not assent to it, he returns it to the Odelsting with a statement INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

201

202

that he does not for the time being find it expedient to sanction it. In that case the Bill must not again be submitted to the King by the Storting then assembled.

Article 79 If a Bill has been passed unaltered by two sessions of the Storting, constituted after two separate successive elections and separated from each other by at least two intervening sessions of the Storting, without a divergent Bill having been passed by any Storting in the period between the first and last adoption, and it is then submitted to the King with a petition that His Majesty shall not refuse his assent to a beneficial, it shall become law even if the Royal Assent is not accorded before the Storting goes into recess.

Article 80 The Storting shall remain in session as long as it deems it necessary and shall terminate its proceedings when it has concluded its business. In accordance with the rules of procedure adopted by the Storting, the proceedings may be resumed, but they shall terminate not later than the last Sunday in the month of September. Within this time the King shall communicate his decision with regard to the Bills that have not already been decided (cf Articles 77 to 79), by either confirming or rejecting them. All those which he does not expressly accept are deemed to have been rejected by him.

Article 81 All Acts (with the exception of those mentioned in Article 79) are drawn up in the name of the King, under the seal of the Realm of Norway, and in the following terms; “We, X, make it publicly known: that the decision of the Storting of the date stated has been laid before Us: (here follows the decision). In consequence whereof We have assented to and confirmed, as We hereby do assent to and confirm the same as Law under Our Hand and the Seal of the Realm.”

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

202

203

Article 86 The Court of Impeachment pronounces judgment in the first and last instance in such proceedings as are brought by the Odelsting against Members of the Council of State, or of the Supreme Court or of the Storting, for criminal offences which they may have committed in their official capacity. The specific rules concerning indictment by the Odelsting in accordance with this Article shall be determined by law. However, the limitation period for the institution of indictment proceedings before the Court of Impeachment may not be set at less than 15 years. The permanent Members of the Lagting and the permanently appointed Members of the Supreme Court are judges of the Court of Impeachment. The provisions contained in Article 87 shall apply to the composition of the Court of Impeachment in the particular case. In the Court of Impeachment the President of the Lagting shall preside. Any person sitting in the Court of Impeachment as a Member of the Lagting shall not resign from the Court if the period for which he is elected as a representative to the Storting expires before the Court of Impeachment has concluded the trial of the case. If he ceases, for any other reason, to be a Member of the Storting, he shall resign as a judge of the Court of Impeachment. The same applies if a Justice of the Supreme Court, who is a Member of the Court of Impeachment, retires as a Member of the Supreme Court.

Article 87 The accused and the person acting on behalf of the Odelsting in the proceedings have the right to challenge as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as will leave remaining fourteen Members of the Lagting and seven Members of the Supreme Court as judges in the Court of Impeachment. Each party in the proceedings may challenge an equal number of the Members of the Lagting, although the accused has the preferential right to challenge one more, if the number to be challenged is not divisible by two. The same shall apply to the challenging of the Members of the Supreme Court. If there are several accused in such proceedings, they exercise the right of challenge collectively in accordance with rules prescribed by law. If the right of challenge is not exercised to the extent permitted, as many Members of the Lagting and of the Supreme Court as are in excess of fourteen and seven respectively retire following the drawing of lots. INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

203

204

When the case comes up for judgment, as many judges of the Court of Impeachment shall retire following the drawing of lots that the Court due to render judgment is left with fifteen Members, of whom at most ten are Members of the Lagting and five Justices of the Supreme Court. The President of the Court of Impeachment and the President of the Supreme Court shall in no case retire following the drawing of lots. If the Court of Impeachment cannot be composed of as many Members of the Lagting or of the Supreme Court as prescribed above, the case may nevertheless be tried and judgment rendered, provided that the Court numbers at least ten judges. Specific provisions as to the procedure to be followed in the composition of the Court of Impeachment shall be laid down by law.

According to the Norwegian Constitution Article 86 the permanent members of the Lagting and the permanently appointed members of the Supreme Court should be judges of the Court of Impeachment — thus a pro forma survey of indicated members follows:

Members of the Norwegian Lagting AD 2008                

ASPHJELL, Jorodd (Arbeiderpartiet) BERGO, Magnar L (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) BJØRNSTAD, Vidar (Arbeiderpartiet) BREDVOLD, Per Roar (Fremskrittspartiet) ENG, Sigrun (Arbeiderpartiet) ENGER. Inger S (Senterpartiet) GRIMSTAD, May-Helen M (Kristelig Folkeparti) GUNDERSEN, Gunnar (Høyre) HALLERAKER, Øyvind (Høyre) HJEMDAL, Line Henriette H (Kristelig Folkeparti) HOKSRUD, Bård (Fremskrittspartiet) HOLMBERG, Kari Lise (Høyre) JACOBSEN, Bjørn (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) JAGLAND, Thorbjørn (Arbeiderpartiet) JOHANSEN, Irene (Arbeiderpartiet) JOHNSEN, Espen (Arbeiderpartiet) INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

204

205

                          

KJOS, Kari K (Fremskrittspartiet) KNUTSEN, Tove Karoline (Arbeiderpartiet) KONGSHAUG, Leif Helge (Venstre) KRISTOFFERSEN, Gerd Janne (Arbeiderpartiet) LANGELAND, Hallgeir H (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) LARSEN, Anne Margrethe (Venstre) LYDVO, Hilde M (Arbeiderpartiet) LØNNING, Inge (Høyre) LÅNKE, Ola T (Kristelig Folkeparti) MANDT-BARTHOLSEN, Sonja (Arbeiderpartiet) MARTHINSEN, Marianne (Arbeiderpartiet) MOE, Ola B (Senterpartiet) NAVARSETE, Liv Signe (Senterpartiet) NIELSEN, Eva M (Arbeiderpartiet) NISTAD, Thore A (Fremskrittspartiet) PETERSEN, Jan (Høyre) REIKVAM, Rolf (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) RYTMAN, Jørund (Fremskrittspartiet) SAMUELSEN, Alf Ivar (Senterpartiet) SCHMIDT, Åse M (Fremskrittspartiet) SOLHOLM, Lodve (Fremskrittspartiet) STRØM, Tor-Arne (Arbeiderpartiet) SUND, Eirin Kristin (Arbeiderpartiet) VAKSDAL, Øyvind (Fremskrittspartiet) VALLERSNES, Finn Martin (Høyre) WIDTH, Per Ove (Fremskrittspartiet) AASLAND, Terje (Arbeiderpartiet)

Members of the Norwegian Supreme Court AD 2008         

SCHEI, Tore (Chief Justice, born 1946) GJØLSTAD, Liv (Justice, born 1945) LUND, Ketil (Justice, born 1939) GUSSGARD, Karenanne (Justice, born 1940) TJOMSLAND, Steinar (Justice, born 1948) COWARD, Kirsti (Justice, born 1940) STANG LUND, Eilert (Justice, born 1939) BROCH OFTEDAL, Lars (Justice, born 1939) FLOCK, Hans (Justice, born 1940) INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

205

206

           

MATNINGSDAL, Magnus (Justice, born 1951) BRUZELIUS, Karin Maria (Justice, born 1941) SKOGHØY, Jens Edvin A (Justice, born 1955) UTGÅRD, Karl Arne (Justice, born 1951) STABEL, Ingse (Justice, born 1946) STØLE, Ole Bjørn (Justice, born 1950) ØIE, Toril Marie (Justice, born 1960) TØNDER, Bård (Justice, born 1948) ENDRESEN, Clement (Justice, born 1949) INDREBERG, Hilde (Justice, born 1957) SVERDRUP, Tone (Justice ad hoc, born 1951) BERGBY, Gunnar (Secretary General, born 1947)

As for the provisions regulating e.g the composition and exact procedure of the Court of Impeachment, these was originally laid down in the Norwegian Act of 5 February 1932 relating to Punishment for Offences Indicted before the Court of Impeachment....and this Act has in all probability been subject to a number of tactical amendments triggered by distinct fear of nearby Complaint* (*cf the Norwegian Act of 30 March 2007 no. 13)! In any case the Norwegian Courts of Justice Act — which still applies to the composition etc of the Court of Impeachment — provides that: 1. All judges (except lay-judges and assessors) must sign a binding assurance obliging them to exert their office conscientiously (sec 60 – cf sec 52 ib item the Norwegian Constitution Article 21 &c); 2. Only persons markedly competent as co-judges and members of the jury through their righteousness, skills and independence should be elected (sec 76 – cf sec‘s 52, 53 and 65 &c ib); 3. Nobody can operate as a judge or juror when particular circumstances potentially diminishing his impartiality eventuates (sec 108 — cf sec‘s 52, 106, 107, 109 and 111 &c ib).

As is meet and proper the individual security under the law has been given a prominent position in globally accepted human rights conventions (cf pp 194– 199 above), and Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights positively lays down that: “All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

206

207

public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.” However...; when it comes to the ―competence‖, ―independence‖ and ―impartiality‖ of Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants, it‘s certainly in order to recall some passages found in FOCO: ―The reader should constantly keep in mind Norwegian authorities unscrupulously will exploit every adequate opportunity to erase, steal and falsify/alter to their advantage any piece of evidence communicated through nearby Complaint — empirically they‘re much prone to manipulate, espy, harass/intimidate, incarcerate, obstruct, weaken and explicitly harm/attack potential/actual witnesses in this and other cases where Norwegian officials are the factual culprits.....and the presentation of forthcoming matter are by and large accommodated these disquieting facts.‖ (cf FOCO, p 10) ―Since 1992 it has been a main objective for Norwegian authorities to maim my general health, ruin my social relationships, isolate me, deny my juridical rights, subdue/quench legal complaints to international fora, mar my reputation, intimidate me, induce pecuniary destitution, provoke harmful tribulations, obstruct globally lifesaving work, minimize my standard of living and — if possible — incite criminality and unethical behavior (cf Doc #4588 etc). The pernicious misconduct of Norwegian authorities in this case are precisely described in the Bible, Isaiah 59:5–8 (corresponding statements are wholly valid independent of your religious faith and theological opinions — cf Doc #2037, ‗Norwegian Vice Spreading‘): ‘They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a spider’s web. Whoever eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched. Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves with what they make. Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence are in their hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed innocent blood. Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and destruction mark their ways. The way of peace they do not know; there is no justice in their paths. They have turned them into crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.’

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

207

208

In many respects Mr Ivar Oftedahl and Ms Harlem Brundtland represents the archetype of my Norwegian foes; frailty, ignoble/plebeian, crabby, evil/base, corrupted/criminal, unstable/dishonest, lunatic/schizophrenic, hypocritical/ pharisaic, malevolent/envious, arrogant/aggressive and sickly self-assertive miscreants attempting to compensate for their shortcomings, inferiority complex and psychopathology through ascribing their nasty defects, wickedness, mental derangement and systematic lawbreaking to others (cf Doc‘s ##633 [‗Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome‘] and 2037 [‗Official Norwegian Hypocrisy and Malevolence‘]). Though human status correctly may be granted my Norwegian enemies, they surely belongs to a particularly noxious subgroup bipeds strongly guided and impressed by stark diabolism, madness, injustice and general lowmindedness — the presence and influence of these infernally vile terrorists are of course absolutely detrimental to any civilized society respecting the human rights, guarding righteousness, and fostering ethicality, personal magnanimity, intellectual/scientific eminence and artistic dexterity usw.‖ (cf FOCO, pp 72–73) ―Studying nearby complaint and adjoining enclosures (cf p 2 — ‗Comments on disqualification‘), reasonable sane and sagacious readers pretty soon will launch an almost inevitable question: ‗Can the various crimes and atrocities described in this report possibly 've been perpetrated by mentally sound creatures...?‘ Based on unique, comprehensive and well-structured collections of data on documentable criminality committed by Norwegian officials since 1992, it's quite easy to give a clear-cut answer to that query: ‗Certainly not.....the ghastly admixture of psychopathies, criminalism, hypocrisy, parvanimity, theomachy, lewdness and fiendishness verily characterizing the cracked personality of most Norwegian officials are, far and away, the worst European and first world example of gross intrapopular depravity and collective insaneness procurable!‘ Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and wormy diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the infected nation which — befittingly — 've been nicknamed ‗The Kingdom of Satan‘! Although psychiatric ill-health and multifarious impairment of higher cerebral functions are alarmingly common amongst Norwegian officials, the greater part of them tends to be criminally responsible as personality

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

208

209

disorders — particularly psychopathy — and various perversions are predominant conditions. The pathologically distorted thought and behavior patterns normally typifying Norwegian public officials and senior civil servants may however — viewed as an endemic phenomenon — partially rupture the commonly accepted boundaries imposed by international norms of disease classification. A genetically rooted and markedly offbeat syndrome symptomatically approaching classical psychopathy and frequently comprising atypical variants of the structural pathology conventionally associated with organic brain diseases, it's hardly unbecoming to introduce the acronym ‗NPSMS‘* — *‗Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome‘ (if more convenient, you may think of NPSMS simply as ‗Norwegian psychopathy‘ or ‗Norwegian folie‘, of course)...! In Doc's ##633 and 2037 — pp 67 and 95, respectively, I've described a number of NPSMS' more or less pathognomonic symptoms — viz: Inadequate judgmental ability, imprudence, atelonoesis, rejoice in evildoing, ponerophilia, cruelty, sadism, dysempathy, superiority/inferiority complexes and complemental maladjustment/overcompensation, falsehood, charlatanism, hypocrisy, professional double-dealing, sickly self-assertiveness, arrogance, cantankerousness, megalomania, general lability, willful neglect and violation of ethical norms, criminalism, recidivism, dikephobia, corruptibility, deceitfulness, psychiatric conditions, delusional ideation, religious insecurity/confusion, theomachy, icono-/supericlasm, hamartiophilia, unwarranted suspiciousness/hostility, turncoat mentality, distrustful jingoism, impudence, prevaricated sociability, ergasiomimesis, feigned eunoia, refractoriness, spiteful envy, peevishness, aggression, irritability, anosognosia, gloominess, lecherousness and voyeurism.....etc. The above collection of personality traits and symptoms manifestly typical but not necessarily conclusive of NPSMS, clearly invites to differentiated diagnosing; while the moodiness and fluctuating self-image are amongst the distinguishing features of the borderline personality, the thoroughgoing reality distortion and oftentimes systematic misinterpretation of events exhibited by some NPSMS afflicted individuals are truly archtypical of regular psychoses. The severe, recurrent and wholly intentional misconduct and criminality fundamentally peculiar to NPSMS-villains are closest related to the antisocial personality disorder, however, but are more complex and frequently includes dangerous paranoia, religious delusions and sheer diabolism. In most psychiatric disorders it's relatively uncomplicated to identify some precipitating factors — i.e psychosocial and physical influence in all INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

209

210

likelihood triggering the mental derangement. When it comes to the NPSMS it's usually hard to detect decisive, psychotogenic factors — as a matter of fact one may feel slightly ill at ease attempting to discriminate readily observable, morbid features from entirely self-willed and obviously unreasonable evil-mindedness...! Ethically indefensible, evilness purely for the sake of evilness may assuredly be a ponerologically acceptable and ipso facto rational aim in itself (most religious dogmas omitted, of course).....consequently — motive and means appearing practically identical — unprovoked evilness may be seen both as a cardinal symptom and causa sine qua non of the Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome. As regards predisposing factors, genetic endowment and hereditary metabolic, anatomical and physiological insufficiencies in prefrontal cortices, the thalamencephalon, hypothalamus and limbic system may be crucial for the actual onset and subsequent diagnosing of NPSMS. Various somatosensory structures and convergence zones in the ventromedial prefrontal sector of the brain may be visibly damaged, and dysfunctions of the medial/lateral orbitofrontal circuit, nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum, corpus Luysii and thalamic nuclei are common NPSMS features. Serotonin's neuronal transmitter functions and capability to modulate v.g dopaminergic neurons may be significantly reduced in NPSMS sufferers, and the GABAergic output pathways of neostriatum and globus pallidus tends to be impaired — monoamine based weaknesses and defective interconnections between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior subgenual cingulate cortex and the ventral striatum may be NPSMS indicative. Despite depicted brain abnormalities, many NPSMS-caitiffs are capable of performing just about normally on standard neuropsychological tests — working memory, concentration and the general intelligence seems to be intact...‖ (cf FOCO, pp 122–124) ―Whereas the Hippocratic oath lay emphasis on honesty, respectfulness and benevolence towards patients and impels physicians to champion international human rights and exercise their professional judgment uninfluenced by political pressure, physicians and other ‗health‘ personnel involved in this ill-omened case maliciously 've displayed the most inexpiable disregard inasmuch as dutiful compliance with ethical stipulations, the statutory rights of others and their vocational integrity otherwise are concerned.....honestly; it's stark impossible to find even the slightest trace of formally mitigating circumstances, respectability or professional adequacy in the uninterrupted orgy of lawless terrorism satanically indulged in by Norwegian medics AO since 1992!

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

210

211

Anyhow, let's make it perfectly clear right now; the actual and radically massive violations of quoted articles noways applies to the Norwegian public ‗health‘ service alone — corresponding malversation has continuously been schemed and illicitly ratified v.g by diverse governmental bodies (cf pp 24– 25, 29–31, 68–74 and 83–88 usw), and does also — largely — include the other officials and establishments referred to as ‗Accused‘ at page 2 of nearby Complaint. Cf Doc #4575, p 117 etc: ‗All interference from Norwegian authorities in this case 've been unilaterally destructive, invidious, unwelcomed and largely criminal — clearly reflecting the mental illness, habitual double-dealing and emetic disregard for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of man indeed characterizing most of the malefactors.‘ The manifestly morbid preoccupation with supernormal intelligence and human genius constantly displayed by Norwegian physicians, psychologists, politicians, police officers et al has been touched upon earlier in this report (v p 118 — cf Doc #1536, p 85), and it should be timely to supply foregoing information with a few germane remarks. Studying the thousands of registered crimes and calamitous boo-boos wholly ascribable to Norwegian officials and local authorities the last decennium, we are struck not only by the unprovoked diabolism and radical unsoundness characterizing these misdeeds, but by the marked lack of foresight and stark fatuity as well. Inasmuch as essential parts of our noometric capability may be adequately evaluated through standardized and accurately scaled intelligence tests…..and given that we fairly correctly may equate corresponding IQ scores with our immanent/potential ability to acceptably handle diverse practical situations and precisely grasp more or less abstract/intricate problems/ideas professionally or otherwise encountered, we may assuredly ascribe much of said improvidence and bêtises ex officio to insufficient psychometric intelligence. At this point those of you familiar with the common classification of IQ scores may feel somewhat bewildered, as it previously 've been correctly stated several of the culprits actual to prosecute in this case possess' a general IQ equal or superior to 140 on the Stanford-Binet scale (cf pp 9–10). IQs corresponding to — or exceeding — indicated score are normally regarded as highly impressive, and many psychologists will set the intelligence quotient for ‗potential genius‘ at 140 or over. In the general INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

211

212

Norwegian population 1 out of 190 people are expected to achieve a Stanford-Binet IQ of 140, and there are roughly 3 men for every woman reaching specified score. Howbeit —; comprehensive observations here in Norway bears witness to the fact individuals with a Stanford-Binet IQ in the 130–155 range are essentially unable to meet the dianoetic requirements necessary to acquire even passable understanding of more intricate scientific, moral and purely logical &c causata/implications/problems. Typically earning their university and first-class degrees relatively hands down, these noometrically — and oftentimes professionally — incompetent persons are likely to occupy central community positions. In cases where the shortcomer has maintained his/her moral and eunoic integrity, the psychometric inadequacy may be accidentally fatal indeed — though — regularly and pragmatically amendable, as the intellectually subpotent faultdoer will be genuinely eager to admit, correct and avoid e.g professional mistakes induced by noometrically overtaxing demands. Inasmuch as the dianoetic deficiency and related/professional fall downs are directly pertinent to NPSMS afflicted individuals/officials* (*cf pp 122–124) — which conspicuously often is the case in Norway, we empirically knows these severely disordered and thoroughly dikephobic wrongdoers will do whatever practically feasible to cover up and belittle their errors/unsuitability/corruption — frequently at the expense of wholly guiltless persons facing false accusations and unwarranted castigation etc. As for the latter case, special attention should be called to the average Stanford-Binet IQ of Norwegian Parliament/Storting representatives at 127,5 (cf p 10) — which, not surprisingly, is 10–14 crucial points below corresponding scores for national/federal assembly members in any EuroAmerican country/state socioeconomically comparable with Norway. Without validating the factual foundation of his suppositions etc, it may be thematically justifiable though to refer to assistant professor of psychology at Princeton University* (*New Jersey, USA) — Mr Carl C BRIGHAM* (*creator of the well-known ‗Scholastic Aptitude Test‘) — who, in 1923, published ‗A Study of American Intelligence‘ where he concluded that the IQ of immigrants increased in proportion to the number of years of US residence — a phenomenon he ascribed to a lower proportion of Nordic blood over the years, rather than increased familiarization with cultural and educational factors…! Anyhow; the US Immigration Restriction Act of 1924 favored immigration from northern Europe, and restricted the entry of persons from other areas referred to as ‗biologically inferior‘ —— At the pages 9 and 85 I've fixed the lowest acceptable Stanford-Binet IQ of different judges/experts at 145 and 140, respectively — but indeed; this does INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

212

213

not imply said scores are absolutely and professionally adequate! What indicated minimum levels does mark, however, are the highest IQ scores practically attainable a number of circumstantial factors and conventional requirements* realistically considered (*amongst the formal prerequisites, a sufficient and high degree of moral integrity, impartiality/independence and educational competency are indispensable). While a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 140 typically will enable otherwise competent members of the Norwegian courts of appeals to handle around 80% of the various lawsuits in a justifiable manner, a ditto IQ of 258 are required to keenly perceive and adequately evaluate usw the intricate nuances and multifarious facts relevant to the most complicated cases brought before these appellate tribunals. Although the present courts of appeals comprises a few judges with a Stanford-Binet IQ equalling or slightly exceeding 140, 45–50% of nowadays judgments/sentences should be overruled on account of regular corruption and the number/severity of procedural errors…..and, finally; whereas corruption are exlex altogether and portrayed degree of erroneousness legally unacceptable, it should be formally correct to render null and void all verdicts and conclusions passed on by these incompetent and obscenely pretentious kangaroo courts whatsoever — cf Doc #627 item nearby Complaint pp 2–8 and 84–88 etc! As for the widespread depravity amongst Norwegian judges, much of it is reflected by ‗The Professional Code and Ethical Philosophy of Norwegian Judges‘* (*cf Aphorisms &c 107–109): „Yes indeed — we‟re chronic crooks, murderers, perjurers, maniacs, forgers, dopenicks, drunkards, corrupted lamebrains and moral lepers.....but; since we effectively ‟ve blocked criminal investigation of our iniquity, dexterously embezzled proofs against ourselves and successfully hampered a diversity of legal actions opposed to our inveterate transgressions and misfeasance, there exist no legally enforceable judgments against us.....and for that reason we are — at least in a profanely juridical sense — not guilty (cf the Courts of Justice Act sec 53, third per)! Moreover we strongly feel that the Norwegian society generally should bestow significantly more of their attention purely revering our allelopathic lawbreaking.....‟cause it‟s an established truism that our surreptitious foulness keep back the constitutional Ragnarok and scandalous imprisonment etc of Norwegian top politicians and Government officials unavoidably following unwarped trials and objective, judicial factfinding procedures! So.....treat us courteously, please, and immortalize our satanic statutory offenses and monumental corruption by placing a luciferous statue outside the Parliament Building, and a leviathan monument at the royal palace INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

213

214

square in Oslo where noble-minded adulators can bring their burnt offerings and confer dignity upon our accomplished forensic diabolism and — also — squareshootingly commemorate the many illustrious adamites slain by our minister extolled vice.....AMEN!‟ Verily; though stinking, a shitfilled sack will stand upright…!‖ (cf FOCO, pp 144–147) ―Behind the previously indicated and markedly pathological interest in paranormality and genius exhibited by Norwegian authorities, we find the deep-seated inferiority complex and narrow-minded egotism broadly explaining their preoccupation. From the very first these natural-born villains and mountebanks searched for esoteric and absurd ways to elevate their base intellect…; perhaps geniuses depended on some secret ingesta or regimen skyrocketing their creativity and IQs….?! Fatefully mixed with archtypical NPSMS symptoms* (*cf pp 122–124) as v.g psychiatric idiosyncrasies, pronounced criminalism and unjustifiable hostility, said selfishness has — in any case — triggered the most pernicious chain of wholly deliberate, systematical and decidedly illstarred human rights violations ever seen in Norway! It's perfectly evident many of the crimes dealt with in this petition and corresponding documents had been very difficult to commit and impossible to get away with in a relatively uncorrupted and otherwise healthy society…..and lo — as might be expected; behind the wormy stage settings we find the meanest herd of mentally deranged, felonious, self-aggrandizing and utterly condemnable misfits and conspiring officials ever sighted in a claimed — not to say pretended — democracy! — and, behold; I'm truthfully characterizing the innately psychopathic descendants of a notoriously fiendish people duly mentioned by the hounded and grotesquely misknown genius William James SIDIS (1898–1944)…: ‗These Norse invaders in 'Vinland,' as they named the country, treated the native inhabitants (whom they named 'Skrellings,' or 'skinned people') about the same way as they did in Europe — as subjects for pillage and slave-raids. They raided as far as the 'Wonderstrand' (Cape Cod), and they usually made themselves enemies wherever they went, in America as in Europe.‘" (cf FOCO, pp 151–152)

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

214

215

―The heinous array of crimes habitually indulged in by Norwegian officials and senior civil servants the latter years, are largely and manifestly ascribable to the tremendous prevalence of indigenous sociopathy* characteristic of Norway (*cf pp 122–124 &c). Based on continuous and exacting observations since 1992, it's perfectly evident Norwegian ‗health‘ personnel and police officers directly executing and criminally liable for the atrocities partially described in nearby Petition and elsewhere has derived sexual excitement and significant satisfaction from their systematic nefariousness and lawbreaking. Combined with fixed and markedly paranoic personality traits, the deeprooted psychopathy and sadism by and large hallmarking Norwegian senior state officials and public servants are practically incurable* (*cf pp 122–127, 155–156 and 172 &c). Under otherwise ‗normal‘ circumstances and the disastrous ascendancy and profane catholicity of state supported criminality considered, it's hardly anything but a waste of time and energy to bring legal/intrastatal actions against the slimy politicians and (senior) civil servants constituting the rotten hard core of official Norwegian malversation….and, especially if you're a high-principled human rights activist, the only acceptable alternative left may be to apply for political asylum outside Norway in order to escape explicitly nocent and unlawful persecution.‖ (cf FOCO, p 190) ―The 2007 version of this official — though tactically incomplete and slightly unconventional — human rights petition, gives a partially unique and unvarnished picture of certain aspects and implications of the state supported corruption obnoxiously suffusing next to all parts of the Norwegian Civil Service. Precisely as anticipated, Norwegian authorities has maintained and segmentally reinforced their intensely criminal, human rights violating, and contemptuously subhuman terrorism throughout AD 2007 (cf pp 1, 10, 122–124, item Doc #4588 etc), and I've described and formally reported a tiny fraction of the various offences only. On the whole, this year may be seen as a practically unbroken chain of state actuated crimes, insanities, and malicious provocations massively corroborating and justifying whatever denouncement of Norwegian authorities set forth in nearby Complaint....indeed; the execrable picture of a nation governed by a pack evil-minded, lunatic, and vehemently depraved lowbrows enthusiastically subverting justice and promoting stark diabolism has become still clearer (cf p 126 &c), and my beforehand wellINTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

215

216

set antipathy toward these slimy and absolutely condemnable representatives of mankind are significantly strengthened! Whereas — as continuously and unambiguously demonstrated since 1992 — Norwegian authorities are both unable and totally unwilling to behave in compliance with international human rights conventions and globally accepted etiquette, it‘s certainly high time drastic steps are taken to remove, incarcerate, and replace the heinously foul recidivists responsible for the corresponding and state supported criminality dealt with in nearby Complaint and enclosed documents* (*cf p 2 ib). Without efficient neutralization of these arrantly criminal elements and — preferably — stabilizing international intervention, Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants will continue to annihilate essential human rights regulations just for hell of it, and arrogantly — typically with distinct delight — ignore Norwegian law whenever deemed necessary to upkeep/escalate/hide etc their sociopathic terrorism or protect themselves and their rotten accomplices against legal prosecution. As expectable — the endemic character and genetic base of the ‗Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrom‘* (*‗NPSMS‘, cf pp 122–124 etc) considered, the extensive criminalism, general ineptness, theological insecurity, and psychopathological disregard for ethical norms usw by and large typifying nowadays Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants, has an abundance of historical parallels.‖ (cf FOCO, 196–197)

Focusing more precisely on the specific reasons for disqualification directly related to nearby impeachment case, special emphasis should be laid on the intimate ties between the King‘s Council and the Norwegian Storting/Parliament. Notwithstanding the revolting fact many Odelsting/Lagting members* (*cf Articles 49 and 73 above) has been — and are — involved in the lawless conspiracy against me (cf FOCO p 30 etc), it appears clearly from the Norwegian Constitution Articles 74–81 that the actual interaction between the Council of State and aforementioned Parliament renders a sufficient degree of independence and impartiality wholly unattainable as far as appointment of judges pursuant to Articles 86 and 87 of said Constitution is concerned; members of the King‘s Council will almost daily meet and associate closely with Norwegian Parliament members both in- and outside the Storting Building in Oslo — indicated persons are colleagues, bosom friends, fellow party/committee/organization/club members, and….partners in crime (— moreover, the great majority of Norwegian Parliament members are also INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

216

217

disqualified from the juror function on account of their intellectual insufficiency — cf FOCO, pp 9 and 146)! When it comes to the Norwegian Supreme Court, it‘s sufficient — for the time being — to refer to FOCO pp 30 and 68; several of corresponding judges — among them Mr Tore SCHEI (the Chief Justice) — should be impeached (cf FOCO pp 33 and 67–68, item pp 205–206 above). In addition to the impeachment cases, there‘ll be legal proceedings against numerous (senior) civil servants in the Norwegian government ministries, the Norwegian police force, the Norwegian public ―health‖ service, the Norwegian State Church, the Norwegian armed forces, Møre og Romsdal county municipality/council, Haram/Molde/Ålesund municipalities, the Norwegian Telecommunications, the Norwegian Post Office Services, the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation….et alia (cf FOCO, p 2). Although the various offences mentioned in FOCO/INDO provides a solid basis for criminal investigation, a most substantial number of essential facts and descriptions of illegal acts has been intentionally omitted from these tactically incomplete books (cf FOCO pp 10 [last paragraph] and 196–197 &c) — in any case unbiased and scrupulous investigation will produce more than enough proofs that will stand up in the court. Aforesaid and extraordinarily vile circumstances considered, it‘s certainly appropriate as well as obligatory to entrust impartial and otherwise competent representatives from an international organization to which Norway adheres (e.g the United Nations) — or will adhere — with the formal responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating etc the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are charged in this case — cf the Norwegian Constitution Article 93, pp 175 and 178 above, item FOCO pp 8–9. ―The members of the actual juries in this case will face a pack welleducated and politically experienced liars who will do their very best to manipulate and deceive them.....so, by reason of the intellectual challenges represented by this and other facts of the case, none possessing a general IQ as measured on the WAIS, Stanford-Binet or PM 47 (―PM 48‖, Raven — 40 min deadline) test subordinate to, respectively; 142, 145 or 143 should be accepted as (lay) judges or experts in forthcoming trials.‖* (FOCO, p 9) *Cf FOCO pp 145–149 etc.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

217

218

―Employing e.g TEMPEST-equipment, Norwegian authorities are constantly downloading stuff appearing on my PC-screen — consequently they‘ve kicked off a putrid charm campaign to surreptitiously influence v.g the UN and various human rights organizations in this case!‖ (INDO, Doc #5007)

Empirically the chances Norwegian authorities will fulfil their juridical obligations and otherwise behave themselves are very small in this unique case (cf FOCO, pp 196–197 etc), but one nevertheless — almost pro forma — admonish members of the Storting and Council of State to comply with Norwegian law and international human rights conventions (cf the Norwegian Constitution Articles 13, 21 and 110 c &c)....; there‘s no way whatsoever Norwegian authorities can win this case, but they can — at least — endeavour to lose it with some dignity.

Norwegian authorities are hereby encouraged to bring Article 93 of their Constitution into service and to further lawful execution of justice by entrusting qualified representatives from the United Nations with the formal responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating usw the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are charged in this case (cf FOCO, pp 8–9).

NO-Brattvåg, May 01 2008

Wilh. Werner WINTHER (SIGNATURE)

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

218

219

ENCLOSURES: 1) FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY* (*hereafter referred to as ―FOCO‖) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1–217, 2) INTERNET DOCUMENTS* (*hereafter referred to as ―INDO‖) by Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER; pp 1–173, 3) letter 108/08-63/ROS004 dated Jan 29 HA from the Norwegian Director General of Public Prosecutions, Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH (NO-Oslo); 1 page, 4) letter 070630/200700587 dated Feb 02 HA from the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters (NO-Hamar); 1 page, 5) e-mail of Oct 28, 2007, from Mr Wilh. Werner WINTHER to the Special Investigating Unit for Police Matters, The Norwegian Supreme Court, the Norwegian Prime Minister, the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, AO; 1 page.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

219

220

03. april 2009 

NAV Haram Storgata, Brattvåg

REFUNDERING AV EKSTRAORDINÆRE UTGIFTER PÅFØRT SØKEREN AV EKSPLISITT KRIMINELLE/ ONDSINNEDE REPRESENTANTER FOR DET KORRUMPERTE NORSKE STATSAPPARATET Den 31. fm måtte undertegnede helt uventet og på kort varsel investere i en ny PC idet hans tidligere laptop ̶ kjøpt hos butikkjeden Expert i Breivika/Ålesund 20. nov f.å ̶ brøt fullstendig sammen etter intense/kriminelle hacker-/crackerangrep gjennomført av notoriske drittsekker og residivister fra den norske politietaten. Ved å korrumpere ellers betrodde/automatiske sikkerhetsoppdateringer fra det amerikanske firmaet Symantec Corporation, klarte de politiansatte på forbrytersk vis å implantere flere farlige trojaner-koder i filene som ble rutinemessig nedlastet til datamaskinens harddisk. Inokulerte trojaner-programmer viste seg hurtig å være særdeles ondartede, og raserte på kort tid PCens operativsystem (Windows Vista Home Premium Edition), brannmur/antivirusprogram/phisingfilter/spionvarebeskyttelse (Norton 360 Version 2.0), Internett-/browser-konfigurasjoner (Telenor Mobilt Bredbånd/IE8) samt diverse/uspesifiserte softwareinstallasjoner etc. Umiddelbart etter de kraftige angrepene ̶ som også omfattet infam manipulasjon av strøm/telenettet og misbruk av elektronisk pulsteknologi etc, ble det dessuten funnet irreparable/abnormale/mekaniske og spontant genererte skader på computerens harddisk. Politietatens fordømmelige og klart illegale oppførsel i denne saken er ikke unik: i oktober/november 2007 infiserte norske politiansatte oppdateringsfiler

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

220

221

fra Symantec Corporation med trojanere som en del av bestrebelsene for å sabotere min daværende laptop (kjøpt i Ålesund kommune 20. sep 2007) ̶ cf Internet Documents #9080* (*se www.pdfcoke.com/wwerner778689). Den aktuelle laptopen ble permanent/delvis ødelagt i november 2007, men kan fortsatt nyttes til enkelte arbeidsoppgaver. Jeg er for lengst lei den vedvarende og sinnssykelige/illegale terroriseringen norske myndigheter utsetter meg for, og har gjentatte ganger søkt om å få innvilget politisk asyl utenfor Norge ̶ NAV Haram v/ Einar TRANDAL har i utvetydige vendinger blitt gjort oppmerksom på dette tidligere. Søkeren mottar ikke sendinger fra f.eks Posten Norge BA, og trenger en computer med Internett-forbindelse bl.a for å ivareta økonomiske forpliktelser (nettbank mv), straffeforfølge/innrapportere stadig nye/alvorlige forbrytelser begått av representanter for nasjonale myndigheter, opprettholde nødvendig/ legal kommunikasjon med advokater og internasjonale menneskerettighetsorganisasjoner/-tribunaler….osv.

I forbindelse med norske myndigheters kriminelle/beskrevne overgrep mot undertegnede foregående måned, søkes om full økonomisk kompensasjon for følgende, dokumenterte merutgifter:

1 stk laptop (merke/modell) Toshiba Satellite Pro L300-1DT: kr 4998,00 Ad-Adware Pro Anniversary Edition + Lavasoft firewall: ″ 396,62 Gebyr for betalingsutsettelse Her & Nå Handlekonto: ″ 99,00 Ekstraordinære utgifter, totalt:

kr 5493,62

Brattvåg, 03. april 2009

Wilh. Werner WINTHER sign.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

221

222

Vedlegg: 1) Faktura fra RS Elektronikk, Brattvåg, 1 ̶ én side 2) Søknad om kontokreditt HER & NÅ, 1 ̶ én side 3) Kvittering fra Lavasoft AB (Göteborg/Sverige), 1 ̶ én side

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

222

223

20. april 2009 

NAV Haram Storgata, Brattvåg

REFUNDERING AV EKSTRAORDINÆRE UTGIFTER PÅFØRT SØKEREN AV EKSPLISITT KRIMINELLE/ ONDSINNEDE REPRESENTANTER FOR DET KORRUMPERTE NORSKE STATSAPPARATET – DEL II Om kvelden den 16. ds printet undertegnede ut de to første sidene av et nytt appendiks til den offisielle FN-rapporten FORMAL COMPLAINT vs the Kingdom of Norway* (*cf www.pdfcoke.com/wwerner778689), og i likhet med alle andre utskrifter fra den lite brukte men uunnværlige Canon Pixma MP610 multifunksjonsskriveren, forløp utprintingen fullstendig problemfritt. Når man et par timer senere – ca kl 23:00 – skulle printe ut en supplerende korrekturside, viste det seg at Canon-maskinen i mellomtiden var påført alvorlig skade vha elektronisk pulsteknologi òg – eventuelt – ondsinnet manipulasjon av strømnettet. Man legger til grunn at ovennevnte multifunksjonsskriver – stasjonert bak forsvarlig låste dører/vinduer etc i Åsen 4, Brattvåg – ble sabotert av norske politiansatte som nærer et patologisk ønske om å skade og terrorisere undertegnede, og viser ellers til søknad stilet NAV Haram 03. ds hvor man begjærer økonomisk kompensasjon for en nesten ny laptop forsettlig ødelagt av de samme drittsekkene. Med hjemmel i norske myndigheters kriminelle og sterkt fordømmelige sabotasje av beskrevne Canon-skriver, søkes hermed om pekuniært vederlag for følgende merutgifter (alle priser er innhentet fra firmaet RS Elektronikk, Brattvåg): TSVP INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

223

224 NAV Haram, 20. apr -09 Side 2

1 stk Canon Pixma MP630 multifunksjonsskriver* 3 stk ChromaLife CLI-8 C/M/Y (13 ml) blekkpatroner* 2 stk ChromaLife CLI-8B (13 ml) blekkpatroner* 1 stk ChromaLife100 CLI-8C (13 ml) blekkpatron*

kr kr kr kr

1749,00 374,00 270,00 135,00

Ekstraordinære utgifter, totalsum:

Kr 2528,00

Brattvåg, 20. april 2009

Wilh. Werner WINTHER sign.

*Canon Pixma MP610 har nylig gått ut av produksjon, og erstattes av MP630modellen (den saboterte Canon-maskinen ble kjøpt hos firmaet Binders i Breivika/Ålesund 20. nov 2007, og tilhørende blekkpatroner kan ikke nyttes i Canon Pixma MP630).

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

224

225

10. mai 2009

NAV Haram Storgata, Brattvåg

PÅANKE AV VEDTAK SAKSNR. 2009/182 – NAV Haram

Anken og en engelskspråklig kommentarutgave av denne inngår i en formell FN-rapport om korrupsjon og psykopatologiske atferdsmønstre i det norske stats- og kommuneapparatet, og klagen suppleres derfor med informasjon og bemerkninger som ellers ville vært naturlig å utelate. Vedtaket som påankes har saksnummer 2009/182 ved NAV Haram, og er undertegnet 22. f.m. av Tor Helge STAVDAL og Einar TRANDAL. Lovhjemmel for anken finnes bl.a i forvaltningsloven §§ 28 og 29, jf § 6 ib item sosialtjenesteloven §§ 8−6 og 8−7 mv.

Om den norske Arbeids- og velferdsforvaltningen, NAV NAV ble opprettet med hjemmel i arbeids- og velferdsforvaltningsloven av 2006, og innen 2010 skal alle norske kommuner ha etablert et lokalt NAVkontor hvor ansatte i den statlige Arbeids- og velferdsetaten samarbeider nært med kommunens sosialtjeneste for å finne brukerrelaterte løsninger. NAV er direkte underlagt Arbeids- og velferdsdirektoratet (jf NAV-loven §§ 3, 5 og 9), og kan i krigstid tildeles arbeidsoppgaver som gjør forvaltningsorganets lokaler og ansatte mv til legitime, militære angrepsmål – jf NAV-loven §§ 10 og 11, trygdeloven §§ 25−16, 25−17 og 25−18, beredskapsloven §§ 3, 5 og 6, samt rekvisisjonsloven §§ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 og 8 etc. INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

225

NAV Haram Brattvåg

10. mai 2009 side 2

226

NAV Haram skal ivareta Arbeids- og velferdsetatens oppgaver så vel som Haram kommunes forpliktelser etter sosialtjenesteloven – jf NAV-loven §§ 14, 15 og 16. Organets hovedoppgaver er ellers nedfelt i NAV-loven § 4.

Saksbehandlingen ved NAV Haram En av grunnforutsetningene for adekvat saksbehandling er at de som skal tilrettelegge fundamentet for eksempelvis en administrativ avgjørelse og eventuelt fatte endelig vedtak i en gitt forvaltningssak, ikke er ugilde eller hemmet på et vis som potensielt og med rimelig grad av sannsynlighet vil svekke deres individuelle upartiskhet, spesifikke handlefrihet, desisive faktainterpretasjon, sannhetssøken og alminnelige vurderingsevne m.m i en utstrekning som negativt influerer ett eller flere trinn i den totale beslutningsprosessen. Av den norske forvaltningsloven § 6 fremgår bl.a at: En offentlig tjenestemann er ugild til å tilrettelegge grunnlaget for en avgjørelse eller til å treffe en avgjørelse i en forvaltningssak når når han selv er part i saken eller andre særegne forhold foreligger som er egnet til å svekke tilliten til hans upartiskhet. Man gjør med dette gjeldende at NAV Haram i påankede sak er eksplisitt ugild etter forvaltningsloven § 6, jf §§ 1 og 10 ib mv, og legger bl.a til grunn at: 1) NAV er et offentlig og landsdekkende forvaltningsorgan som står i et lovregulert og i denne sammenheng særlig uakseptabelt avhengighetsforhold til grovt kriminelle og internasjonalt innklagede elementer i den norske sentraladministrasjonen o.a.st; 2) norske sentralstyresmakter og ansatte i Haram kommune siden 1992 i fellesskap har opptrådt som en notorisk og forbrytersk terroristorganisasjon hvis statsautoriserte og uomtvistelig kriminelle hovedmål har vært å skade og plage undertegnede; 3) Haram kommune i likhet med norske styresmakter sentralt nærer et kriminelt og annerledes fordømmelig ønske om å hindre undertegnedes selvoppofrende menneskerettighetsarbeid m.m ved bl.a å sabotere nødvendig data- og kommunikasjonsmateriell; 4) Norges statlige og kommunale myndigheter innehar en ytterst sentral og udelt negativ rolle i undertegnedes formelle FN-tilskriv Formal Complaint vs the Kingdom of Norway* og UN-Documents by Wilhelm Werner Winther*; INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

226

NAV Haram Brattvåg

10. mai 2009 side 3

227

5) en rekke personer med fremtredende stillinger og verv i Haram kommune og Norges sentralforvaltning i årevis har pleiet konspiratorisk og klart rettsstridig kontakt med ledende representanter for de politiansatte og statsoppbakkede drittsekkene som saboterte datamateriellet en søker økonomisk kompensasjon for; 6) NAVs saksbehandler – Einar Trandal – var en av beryktede Vegard AUSTNES‘** håndgangne lakeier (**jf UN-Documents*, Doc‘s ##6097 og 8017 mv), og at hr Trandal er meget godt kjent med sin personlige og uforanderlige fiendestatus; 7) NAVs saksbehandler, Einar Trandal, under et lite tilforlatelig dekke av å være nøytral gjør sitt beste for å skjule og videreføre statlige så vel som kommunale overgrep og forbrytelser mot undertegnede.

Det er ellers symptomatisk og sterkt kritikkverdig at NAV Haram i vedtaket som påklages med velberådd hu fremstiller undertegnedes sollisitasjoner av 03. og 20. f.m som simple og endog malplasserte ―søknader om økonomisk sosialhjelp‖, når man vitterlig krever – sic: ―REFUNDERING AV EKSTRAORDINÆRE UTGIFTER PÅFØRT SØKEREN AV EKSPLISITT KRIMINELLE/ ONDSINNEDE REPRESENTANTER FOR DET KORRUMPERTE NORSKE STATSAPPARATET‖ NAVs depraverte saksbehandler(-e) underslår glatt at undertegnede også i oktober/november 2007 fikk en nyinnkjøpt laptop sabotert av politiansatte drittsekker i forbindelse med aktverdig menneskerettighetsarbeid og lovlig anmeldelse av offentlig kriminalitet til Haram gjennomkorrupte lensmannskontor (cf UN-Documents*, Doc #9080 &c), og nevner heller ikke at undertegnede gjentatte ganger har søkt om politisk asyl utenfor Norge for å unnslippe den sinnssykelige/illegale trakasseringen norske myndigheter sammenhengende og over svært lang tid har utsatt ham for. NAV Haram tier patognomonisk om at undertegnede i sin søknad av 03. f.m presiserer at han trenger en computer med Internett-forbindelse bl.a for å straffeforfølge/innrapportere stadig nye/alvorlige forbrytelser begått av representanter for nasjonale myndigheter m.m, og når man så avslår undertegnedes søknad om tilskudd til fri advokatbistand for å straffeforfølge NAV-ansatte og firmaet Nordvest Nett AS (jf søknad stilet NAV Haram 04. mars d.å), er dette en fullstendig følgeriktig og veldokumentert konsekvens av massive kommunale/ statlige anstrengelser for systematisk å undergrave ansøkerens rettssikkerhet og dermed unndra skyldige tjeneste-/embetsmenn mfl legal etterforskning og domfellelse m.m.

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

227

NAV Haram Brattvåg

10. mai 2009 side 4

228

NAVs skandaløse vedtak av 22. f.m er et åpenbart og ingenlunde uventet håndslag til den renspikkede djevelskapen og stinkende kriminaliteten norske myndigheter kontinuerlig har eksponert undertegnede for siden 1992, og det nedlegges derfor slik

PÅSTAND: NAV Haram omgjør vedtak med internt saksnummer 2009/182 slik at undertegnede snarest får pekuniært vederlag for sabotert datamateriell med til sammen kr 8021,62.

Brattvåg, 10. mai 2009

Wilh. Werner WINTHER sign.

Vedlegg: Søknader stilet NAV Haram 03. og 20. f.m, til sammen 04 – fire – sider. *Dokumentet kan leses/nedlastes på www.pdfcoke.com/wwerner778689 INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

228

229

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

229

230

INTERNET DOCUMENTS by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway

230