The University Of Denver Graduate School Of Social Work

  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View The University Of Denver Graduate School Of Social Work as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 5,578
  • Pages: 19
THE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK SOWK 4971: Social Work and Information and Communication Technologies 3 credit hours Professor Walter LaMendola, PhD (303) 871-2796 [email protected]

Spring Quarter 2007 Craig 477, Office Hours: 11-12 Tues

COURSE SYLLABUS I

COURSE DESCRIPTION AND RATIONALE Information and communication technology (ICT) availability and use has increased at an astonishing rate over the past decade. Social workers now use and encounter information and communication technologies in their professional practice regardless of setting or population served. These technologies range from the telephone to the video play station. Despite their proliferation, they are often driven by values that do not consider social work values of importance – and social workers are not well prepared to deal with the context and consequence of ICT technologies. Social workers – unlike some other professions – must not only use ICT as tools, but they must also exercise a professional responsibility to judge technologies and their application and question whether or not they promote effective human services, social and economic justice, a good quality of life, and a multicultural community. Presently it is rare that a social worker develops or produces ICT applications to alleviate and prevent social problems affecting individuals, families and communities – though that may soon change. But whether or not they produce such applications, social workers can be prepared to influence or encourage ICT applications that support the social work code of ethics. This course is intended for students in advanced clinical (work with individuals, couples and families) or community practice (work in administration, community organizing and development, policy analysis and advocacy) who are interested in the effective use of these technologies and in developing critical skills that allow them to question, critique, and/or influence the development of communication and information technology applications. The course is designed as primarily an experiential course, but also as one that provides the student with a background in the history, use, and application of ICT in the social work profession.

In summary, the course will focus on social workers as users of technology and as questioners of technology. The dual focus will examine communication and information technologies using a tool metaphor, but extending that metaphor to expose the production of cultural artifacts that have ethical consequence and that profoundly influence social development while transmitting social value. III

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES This course intends to prepare students to • Increase their familiarity with ICT applications in use in social work and how they are constructed • Understand the potential of ICT in social work • Judge whether populations of interest to social work are or can be empowered via technological innovations • Survey the present landscape of communication and information technology applications, primarily on the Internet, that are specifically related to professional social work, such as: Social work knowledge bases Social work agencies Social work interventions Social advocacy Social work education and training Ethics Diversity Digital divide Cyber abuse Cyber counseling/therapy • Learn how social work practice skills are presently applied in interactive ICT applications. • Learn higher level (ICT) skills for advanced social work practice, including use of newer tools, such as blogging, podcasting, learning management systems, and wikis.

IV READINGS Required: B. J. Fogg. (2003) Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do (This book is also available as an electronic resource through Penrose Library) V METHODS OF TEACHING This course utilizes a combination of experiential learning techniques, including individual investigation, electronic presentations, projects of various types, and exploration of electronic materials. In addition, there are exercises, discussions, readings and facilitation by the instructor.

2

VI CONTENT ON SPECIAL POPULATIONS Throughout this entire course, we will be examining content of historically oppressed populations including ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, religion/spiritual beliefs, socioeconomic status, language, differing abilities, geography, and developmental stages. These topics are crucial to social workers. Each student should be prepared to examine her or his own feelings regarding the above material. VII COURSE OUTLINE First session Brief overview of course. Experiential Examination of the Pew Internet & American Life Project Exploring persuasion on the Web Finding persuaders of interest to social work Setting up student ICT resources Readings: Fogg. Preface, Introduction, Chapter 1, pp. ix-22. Second session The Functional Triad Assignment #1 due: identify ICT in use in field agency Experiential: Examples on the Web Computers as tools – increase capabilities Computers as medium – provide experiences Computers as agents – create relationships Review student ICT resources Putting field ICT into the functional triad. Sorting through field ICT pieces and pick focus for wiki Reading: Fogg Chapter 2, pp23-29 Suggested Falk, D., (2004). Selected websites for high-to-low end NPO website development. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(3), 81-88. Available through university e-journals. Freddolino, P. (2003). Agency utilization of free Internet web sites. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(1), 67-73. Available through university ejournals. Third session Computers as Persuasive Tools Assignment #2 due: Find computer products on Web to explore wiki social work practice focus. Link and describe them on wiki. Experiential: Reduction: persuading through simplifying Tunneling: persuading by guiding Tailoring: persuading by individualizing Suggestion: persuading at the learning moment Self-monitoring: persuading by tracking Surveillance: persuading through observation Conditioning: persuading through reinforcement Blog setup, wiki links , set up feeds Reading: Fogg Chapter 3, pp31-59

3

Fourth session: Computers as Medium Assignment #3 due: Use second life: report experience on wiki. Experiential Cause and effect experiences Simulated environments Simulated objects Reading: Fogg Chapter 4, pp 61-87 A Bill of Rights for the Information Age (Glastonbury and LaMendola, 1992) at http://www.du.edu/~wlamendo/techumanity/techumanity.html Suggested Review Wikipedia entry “World Summit on the Information Society” http://webxact.watchfire.com/ A site to test web sites for accessibility. Bricout, J. (2001). Making computer-mediated education responsive to the accommodation needs of students with disabilities. Journal of Social Work Education, Vol. 37, No.2 (Spring/Summer 2001), 267-281. Available through university e-journals. Fifth session: Computers as Social Actors Assignment #4 due: Use rethos.com, neopets.com: report experience on wiki. Experiential Persuasion using cues Persuading using language Persuading using social dynamics Persuading using social roles Reading: Fogg Chapter 5, pp 89-120 Sixth session: Mid course evaluation Assignment #5 due: Review student projects from Netherlands. Comment on each on wiki. Experiential Computer credibility Credibility types Consolidation of materials: student critique of course wikis and blogs. mid-course evaluation by students students discuss individualized project Reading: Fogg Chapter 6, pp 121-145 Seventh session: Cyberabuse Assignment #6 due: Review the rippleeffects.com and true.com websites: report assessments on wiki using web credibility grid Experiential Web credibility Credibility studies Trustworthiness and the Web The Web Credibility Framework The Web Credibility Grid Review of major areas of cyberabuse of interest to social work student work on individualized projects Reading: Fogg Chapter 7, pp 147-181 Suggested

4

Finn, J., Kerman, B. (2004). Internet risks for foster families online. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 22 (4), 21-38. Available through university e-journals. Spence-Diehl, E. (2003). Stalking and technology: The double-edged sword. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(1), 5-18. Available through university e-journals. Eighth session Social work ICT with mobility and connectivity Assignment #7 due: Review ning.com, tribe.net, cyberbullying.us. Report on wiki Experiential Persuasion through mobile technology Persuasion through connected technology student work on individualized projects Reading: Fogg Chapter 8, pp 183-210 Ninth session Social work ethics & the ethics of persuasive technology Assignment#8 due: Go to the Mayo clinic depression assessment Website. Assess the website from a social work ethical standpoint Experiential Is persuasion unethical? Ethical concerns Examining intentions, methods, and outcomes Use with vulnerable groups Stakeholder analysis student work on individualized projects Reading: Fogg Chapter 9, pp 211-239 Session ten Looking Forward Assignment #9 due students construct a social work ICT vision statement, comment on the fit with each of the future trends in captology, and put it in their wiki/blog. Experiential Students present individualized projects Course discussion Course evaluation Reading: Fogg Chapter 10, pp 241-253 VIII EVALUATION OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE Each weekly assignment will contribute a maximum of 10 points toward the final grade. The individualized project will contribute a maximum of 10 points toward the final grade. The individualized project is a creative task asking that the student imagine and describe a persuasive computing product that motivates behavior change

5

Assessment Classification

Range

Grade

Excellent Work (above course expectations)

94-100 91-93

A A-

Grade Point 4.0 3.7

88-90 B+ 3.3 84-87 B 3.0 81-83 B2.7 78-80 C+ 2.3 Poor Work 74-77 C 2.0 (meets minimal course expectations) 71-73 C1.7 Failing Work 70-0 F 0.0 Incomplete* ( I ) *will only be given in accordance with the policies in the Student Manual Good Work (meets course expectations)

IX

POLICY CONCERNING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES If you have a disability protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and need to request accommodations, please make an appointment with the Disability Services Program (DSP); 303-871-2372, located in Driscoll South, Suite 30. The Handbook for Students with Disabilities is available online at http://www.du.edu/disability and is also available from Carole Fee Ivanoff, Director of Student Services for GSSW students. Once documentation has been received by DSP and the accommodation(s) afforded, please meet with your instructors as early in the quarter as possible to discuss how the accommodation(s) will be implemented and how your needs can be appropriately met.

X

POLICY CONCERNING ACADEMIC INTEGRITY & ETHICAL CONDUCT Students taking this course are expected to adhere to the NASW Code of Ethics, the GSSW Ethical Behavior and Conduct statement in the student handbook, and the rules regarding Academic Dishonesty, also found in the student handbook. Students are expected to demonstrate professional behavior at all times, showing respect to peers, instructors, and diverse points of view. The University of Denver Honor Code defines plagiarism as representation of another's work or ideas as one's own and fabrication as falsification or creation of data, research or resources to support academic submission. Both are academically dishonest and grounds for disciplinary action.

6

XI

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abels, P. (1972). Can computers do social work? Social Work, 17, No.5. Ainbinder, A. (2006) Coping in the Context of Poverty (Unpublished dissertation) Anderson, P., Jacobs, C., Rothbaum, B. (2004). Computer-supported cognitive-behavioral treatment of anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 60(3), 331-345. Batagelj, Z., Vehovar, V. (1998). Technical and methodological issues in WWW surveys. Available: http://www.ris.org/ris98/stlouis/index.html (2000, November) Beck, C. T. . (2005) . Benefits of participating in Internet interviews: Women helping women . Qualitative Health Research, 15, 3, pp. 411-422. Badagliacco, J. (1990). Gender and race differences in computing attitudes and experiences. Social Science Computer Review, 8, 42-63. Becnel, J. M., Ray, S., Wolf, T. M., Lotten, T., & Williams, J. Jr. (1998). The New Orleans Patient Tracking System (PTS): data management for a network of community-based alcohol and drug treatment providers. Computers in Human Services, 14 (3-4), 73-98. Berghoef, M. (2004). Website design and consultant choice resources. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(3), 89-96. Bloom, M., Fischer, J., Orme, J. (2003). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Bloom, J., Walz, G. (Eds.) (2000). Cybercounseling and cyberlearning: Strategies and resources for the Millenium. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association. Bloom, J. (1998). The ethical practice of Web Counseling. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol. 26, No. 1, 53-59. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning with additional materials from the Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, M. Suzanne Donovan, John D. Bransford, and James W. Pellegrino (Eds). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education of the National Research Council, National Academy Press, Electronic Version available from Penrose Bricout, J. (2001). Making computer-mediated education responsive to the accommodation needs of students with disabilities. Journal of Social Work Education, Vol.37, No. 2 (Spring/Summer), 267-281.

7

Bronson, D.E., Pelz, D., Trzcinski, E., (1988). Computerizing your agency’s information system. NJ: Sage Publications. Brown, T. G., J. Topp, & D. Ross. (2003). Rationales, obstacles and strategies for local outcome monitoring systems in substance abuse treatment settings. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 31-42. Butterfield, W. (1998). Human services and the information economy. Computers in Human Services, 15 (2/3), 121-143. Cahill, M. (1993). Computer technology and the human services in the 90s: Advancing theory and practice. Computers in Human Services, Vol.9, No.3/4. Canada, K., Brusca, F. (1991). The technological gender gap: Evidence and recommendations for educators and computer-based instruction designers. Educational Technology Research & Development, Vol.39, Number 2. Caputo, R. (1988). Management and information systems in human services. New York: Haworth Press. Carillo, T., Kasser, J., and Moretto, A. (1985). Management information systems: Who is in charge? Social Casework, 417-423. Cavanagh, K., Shapiro, D. (2004). Computer treatment for common mental health problems. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 60(3), 239-251. Cnaan, R., Parsloe, P. (Eds.) (1989). The impact of information technology on social work practice. New York: Haworth Press. Coe, J., Menon, G. (Eds.) (2000). Computers and Information Technology in Social Work: Education, Training, and Practice. NY: Haworth. Cohen, G. E. & Kerr, B. A. (1998). Computer-mediated counseling: an empirical study of a new mental health treatment. Computers in Human Services, 15(4), 13-26. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152. Collie, K.R., Mitchell, D., Murphy, L. (2000). Skills for online counseling: Maximum impact on minimum bandwidth. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association. Cordero, A. (1991). Computers and community organizing: Issues and examples from New York City. Computers in Human Services, Vol.8, No.1.

8

Davidson, T. & Davidson, J.R. (1995). Cost-containment, computers and confidentiality. Clinical Social Work Journal, 23 (4), 453-464. Davidovich, U.(2005) Challenges in conducting longitudinal randomized controlled trials online - The story of evaluating an online tailored HIV-prevention intervention. General Online Research Conference. German Society for Online Research. Zurich, Switzerland, March 22-23. DeMuth, P. (1984). Eliza and her offspring. Using computers in clinical practice. New York: Haworth. Dombrowski, S., LeMasney, J., Ahia, C., Dickson, S. (2004). Protecting children from online sexual predators: Technological, psychoeducational and legal considerations. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, Vol. 35(1), 65-73. Eastman, B. (1991). Women, computers and social change. Computers in Human Services, Vol.8, No.1. Evans, J.R. and Anil Mathur.(2005) The Value of On-line Surveys. Internet Research 15(2), pp. 195-219. Falk, D., (2004). Selected websites for high-to-low end NPO website development. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(3), 81-88. Figley, C. (Ed.) (1985). Computers and family therapy. New York: Haworth Press Finnegan, D.J. (1996). Unraveling social workers’ ambivalence toward computer technology: an analysis of the attitudes of social work students towards computers and social work practice. Computers in Human Services, 13 (2), 33-49. Freddolino, P. (2003). Agency utilization of free Internet web sites. New Technology in the Human Services. Vol. 22, 67-73. Friedrich-Freksa, M., Liebelt, M. (2005). From short message service (SMS) questionnaires to mobile Internet surveys: Integrating the mobile phone into market research . General Online Research Conference. German Society for Online Research. Zurich, Switzerland, March 22-23. Fuchs, M.(2006) Nonresponse and Measurement Error in Mobile Phone Surveys. 2nd International Conference on Telephone Survey Methodology. American Statistical Association. Miami,Florida: January 2006. Galinsky, M. J., Schopler, J. H., & Abell, M. D. (1997). Connecting group members through telephone and computer groups. Health & Social Work, 22 (3), 181188.

9

Gandy, J, Tepperman, L. (1990). False alarms: Conclusions and implications. In Gandy, J., Tepperman, L. False alarm. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier Press. Geiss, G., and Viswanathan, N. (Eds.) (1986). The human edge. New York: Haworth Press.Services. Vol. 22, 67-73. Gelman, S. R., Pollack, D., & Weiner, A. (1999). Confidentiality of social work records in the computer age. Social Work, 44 (3), 243-252. Gerson, R. (1985). Teaching systems psychotherapy with microcomputers: A creative approach. In Figley, C.R. (Ed.) Computers in family therapy. New York: Haworth. Giffords, E. (1998). Social work on the Internet: an introduction. Social Work, 43 (3), 243251. Glastonbury, B., and LaMendola, W. (1992). The integrity of intelligence: A bill of rights for the Information age. NY: St. Martin’s Press. Glastonbury, B., LaMendola, W., Toole, S. (Eds.) (1988). Information technology and the human services. Chichester, ENG: John Wiley & Sons. Glastonbury, B. (1985). Computers in social work. London, ENG: MacMillan Publishers. Goldman, B.A. (1991). The environment and community right to know: Information for participation. Computers in Human Services, Vol.8, No.1. Grant, G., & Grobman, L. (1998). The social worker’s internet handbook. PA: White Hat Communications. Grigorian, K. H., Sederstrom, S.(2005) Qualitative Comparison of Paper and Online SelfAdministered Modes. The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) 60th Annual Conference, Miami Beach: May 12-15. Graziani, P., Burzagli, L. (1999). Experience of an electronic newspaper service for the blind. New Technology in the Human Services. Vol. 12, Nos. 1 and 2, 26-32. Gripton, J., Licker, P., deGroot, L. (1986). Applying computers to clinical social work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, Vol.13, No. 1, March. Grishman, M.H. (1995). Development of a computer information management system. Social Work in Health Care, 22 (2), 73-86. Hick, S., McNutt, J. (Eds.) (2002). Advocacy, activism and the Internet. Chicago, ILL: Lyceum Books, Inc.

10

Hile, M. G. (1998). The history and function of the target cities management information systems: an introduction to the special issue. Computers in Human Services, 14 (3/4), 1-8. Howard, M.D. (1995). From oral tradition to computerization: A case study of a social work department. Computers in Human Services, 12 (3-4), 203-219. Huang H. and S. Liaw.(2005) Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior 21(5) September pp. 729-743. Joinson, A. N., Woodley, A., Reips, U. (2005) Personalization, authentication and selfdisclosure in self-administered Internet surveys. General Online Research Conference. German Society for Online Research. Zurich, Switzerland, March 22-23. Jamieson, D. (1996). NPO webmaster. Toronto: Hilborn Interactive, Inc. Kanani, K., Regehr, C. (2003). Clinical, ethical, and legal issues in e-therapy. Families in Society, 84, 2, 155-162. Kardas, E.P., Milford, T. (1996). Using the Internet for social science research and practice. CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Karon, P. (1996). Client/server system helps find homes for special kids. InfoWorld, 18 (3), 60. Kava, Sharon E. and Walter F. LaMendola. “Potential Uses of Telecommunications in Rural Hospital Social Work: An American Analysis,” Computer Applications in Social Work and the Allied Professions. Vol. 3, No. 3, Spring 1987. Kaye, R. A., Stephens, R. C., Chen, H. T. & Bruno, W. J. (1998). Development and use of information systems in the Cleveland Target Cities Demonstration project. Computers in Human Services, 14 (3/4), 9-28. Kenwright, M., Liness, S., Marks, I. (2001). Reducing demands on clinicians by offering computer-aided self-help for phobia/panic: Feasibility study. British Journal of Psychiatry, Volume 79, 456-459. Kiernan, N. E., Kiernan, M., Oyler, M. A., Gilles, C.(2005) Is a Web survey as effective as a mail survey? A field experiment among computer users. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 2, pp. 245-252. King, S., Engi, S., Poulos, S. (1998). Using the Internet to assist family therapy. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol.26, No. 1, 43-52. Khan, B.H. (Ed.) (1997). Web-Based instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, Incorporated.

11

Knudsen, H. K. P. M. R. (2004). Modeling the use of innovations in private treatment organizations: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26, 51-59. LaMendola, Walter, Bryan Glastonbury & Victor Savtschenko. “A Bill of Rights Approach to the Socially Sustainable Development of an Information Society.” HUSITA 7 Conference, Hong Kong, August 26, 2004. LaMendola, Walter & Bryan Glastonbury. “Critique of the United Nations World Summit on the Information Society Draft Declaration of Principles and Plan of Action.” Expert Meeting, Maiden Bradley, England, June , 2003. Retrieved 26 June 2003 http:\\www.stakes.fi. LaMendola, Walter F. “Telemental Health Services in US Frontier Areas” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences Volume 86, Number 3, December 2000. LaMendola, Walter F. “Telemental Health Services in US Frontier Areas: Provider and Consumer Perspectives” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences Volume 86, Number 3, December 2000. LaMendola, Walter F. “Consumer and Service Provider Reactions to Telemental Health Services: Letter to the Field No. 12.” Frontier Mental Health Services Resource Network, Denver, Colorado, December 22, 1998. LaMendola, Walter F., Glastonbury, B. and Stuart Toole, eds. A Casebook of Computer Applications in Health and Social Services. New York, Haworth Press. 1989. LaMendola, Walter F., Glastonbury, B. and Stuart Toole, eds. “A Casebook of Computer Applications in Health and Social Services: Part Two”, Computers in Human Services, Volume 4, Numbers 3, 4, 1989. LaMendola, Walter F., Glastonbury, B. and Stuart Toole, eds. “A Casebook of Computer Applications in Health and Social Services: Part One”, Computers in Human Services, Volume 4, Numbers 1,2, 1989. LaMendola, Walter F. Distance Learning in Glastonbury B., LaMendola, Walter F., and Stuart Toole, eds. Information Technology & The Human Services. London, John Wiley. 1988. LaMendola, Walter F. Network & Electronic Communications in Glastonbury, B., LaMendola, Walter F., and Stuart Toole, eds. Information Technology & The Human Services. London, John Wiley. 1988. LaMendola, Walter F. “Teaching Information Technology To Social Workers,” Journal of Teaching In Social Work. Vol. 1, No. 1, Spring/Summer 1987.

12

LaMendola, Walter F., “Software Development in the USA,” Computer Applications in Social Work and the Allied Professions. Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring, 1986. LaMendola, Walter F. “The Future of Human Service Information Technology: An Essay on the Number 42,” Computers in Human Services. Vol. l, No. l, January 1985. LaMendola, Walter F. Summary: Information Technology Applied to Facilitating Social Work Practice Chapter 5 in Gunther Geiss and Narayan Visiwanathan, eds. The Human Edge: Information Technology and Helping People. New York: Haworth Press, 1985. LaMendola, Walter F. “Feasibility as a Consideration in Small Computer Selection,” Administration in Social Work, 5 (3, 4), Winter 1981. LaMendola, Walter F. Some Effects of Microcomputer-Based Information Systems in Human Service Organizations, in G. E. Lasker, ed., Applied Systems and Cybernetics, Vol. 3. New York: Pergamon Press, 1981. LaMendola, Walter F. “A Personal Computer-Based Human Service Organization Information System,” National Computer Conference Personal Computer Proceedings. New York: American Federation of Information Processing Societies, 1979. Lange, A., Schrieken, J. van de Ven, J., Bredeweg, B., Emmelkamp, P. (2000). ‘Interapy’: The effects of a short protocolled treatment of posttraumatic stress and pathological grief through the Internet. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28, 175-192. Leonardi, P. M. (2003). Problematizing "new media": Culturally based perceptions of cell phones and computers among United States Latinos. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(2), 160-179. Leung, P., Cheung, K., Stevenson, K. (1994). Advancing competent social work practice: A computer-based approach to child protective service training. Computers in Human Services, Vol.11, No.3/4. Levenson, D. (1997). Online counseling: Opportunity and risk. NASW News, September, p.3. Lidsky, D., Kwon, R. (1997). Searching the net. PC Magazine, December 2nd, 227-258. Link, M. W., Mokdad, A. (2005) Alternative Modes for Health Surveillance Surveys: An Experiment with Web, Mail, and Telephone. Epidemiology, 16, 5, pp. 701-704. Linn, N. A., Schneider, S. J., McCreery, R. & Kasab, D. S. (1998). Expert system for utilization of alcohol and drug abuse cases. Computers in Human Services, 15 (4), 1-12.

13

Loyd, B. H., & Loyd, D. E. (1985). The reliability and validity of instruments for the assessment of computer attitudes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 903– 908. Luce, K. H., Winzelberg, A. J., Das, S., Osborne, M. I., Bryson, S. W., Taylor, C. B. (2006) Reliability of self-report: paper versus online administration. Computers in Human Behaviour (in press). Mangunkusumo R., P. W. Moorman, A. E. Van Den Berg-de Ruiter, J. Van Der Lei, H.J. De Koning, H. Raat. (2005) Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study. Journal of Adolescent Health 36 (1) January, Page 70. MacFadden, R. (2005). Souls on Ice: Incorporating Emotion in Web-based Education. In MacFadden, R. J., Moore, B., Herie, M., Schoech, D. (Eds.). Web-Based Education in Human Services: Models, Methods and Best Practices. NY: Haworth. MacFadden, R. J. (2005). Information Technology. In F. Turner (Ed.). Canadian Encyclopedia of Social Work. Waterloo, ONT: Wilfred Laurier Press. MacFadden, R.J. (2002). Teaching online. Journal of Technology in Human Services. Volume 19, Number 1, 72-75. MacFadden, R. J., Maiter, S., Dumbrill, G. (2002). High tech and high touch: The human face of online education. In Resnick, H., Anderson, P. (Eds.). Human services technology: Innovations in practice and education. NY:Haworth Press, 283-300. MacFadden, R.J. (2000). Billy breaks the rules. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol.17 (4), 53-58. MacFadden, R.J., Dumbrill, G., Maiter, S. (2000). Web-based education in a graduate faculty of Social Work: Crossing the new frontier. New Technology in the Human Services, Vol. 13, No. 1/2, 27-38. McCabe, S. E., C. J. Boyd, A. Young, S. Crawford, D. Pope (2005) Mode effects for collecting alcohol and tobacco data among 3rd and 4th grade students: A randomized pilot study of Web-form versus paper-form surveys. Addictive Behaviors (30)4, pp. 663-671. Marlowe-Carr, L. C. (1997). Social workers on-line: a profile. Computers in Human Services, 14 (1), 59-70. Marson, S. (1997). A selective history of Internet technology and social work. Computers in Human Services, 14 (2), 35-49. Martin, John, Walter LaMendola and David Price. “Developing Web based Internet Services for Criminal Justice Systems,” Judges Journal, Volume 24, Number 2, 1993.

14

Martinez-Brawley, E.E. (1995). Knowledge diffusion and transfer of technology: Conceptual premises and concrete steps for human services innovators. Social Work, 40 (5), 670-682. McCready, D. J., Pierce, S., Rahn, S. L., & Were, K. (1996). Third generation information systems: integrating costs and outcomes. Tools for professional development and program evaluation. Administration in Social Work, 20 (1), 1-15. Miesenberger, K. (2002). Computers helping people with special needs. NY: SprinterVerlag. Miller, D. B. & DiGiuseppe, D. (1998). Fighting social problems with information: the development of a community database-the violence information network. Computers in Human Services, 15 (1), 21-34. Miller, W. R. and S. Rollnick (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior., The Guilford Press, New York, NY. Moya, Paula (2002) Learning from Experience: Minority Identities, Multicultural Struggles. Berkeley: University of California Press. Murphy, L. J. , Mitchell, D. (1998). When writing helps to heal: E-mail as therapy. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol.26, No.1, 21-31. Murphy, J., Pardek, J. (1988). The computer micro-world, knowledge and social planning. In Murphy, J., Pardek, (Eds.) Technology and human service delivery. New York: Haworth Press. Mutschler, E., Hasenfeld, Y. (1986). Integrated information systems for social work practice. Social Work, September-October. NASADAD. (2003). Recommendations Related to Closing the Treatment Gap (Policy Position Paper). Washington, DC: National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors.. Natal, Dottie and Walter LaMendola. “An Object Relational Model for the Prevention Decision Support System” US DHHS, SAMHSA, CSAP, January 15, 2001. Noel, J., Epstein, J. (2003). Social support and health among senior Internet users: Results of an online survey. New Technology in the Human Services. Vol. 22 (3), 35-54. Nurius, P., Hudson, W. (1988). Computer-based practice: Future dream or current reality? Social Work, July-August, 357-362.

15

Opalinski, L. (2001). Older adults and the Digital Divide: Assessing results of a Web-based Survey. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol., No. 3/4 , 203-221. Oyserman, D. & Benbenishty, R. (1997). Developing and implementing the integrated information system for foster care and adoption. Computers in Human Services, 14 (1), 120. Pardeck, J.T. (1997). Computer technology in clinical practice: a critical analysis. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 7 (2), 101-111. Pardeck, J. (1998). Rationalizing decision-making through computer technology: a critical appraisal. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 9 (4), 19-29. Pardeck, J.T., Dotson, B.M., Ricketts, A.K., McCully, K., & Lewis, A.E. (1995). A replication of a study exploring the utilization of computer technology by social workers. The Clinical Supervisor, 13 (2), 127-140. Pertierra, R. (2005) Mobile Phones, Identity & Discursive Intimacy, Human Technology, 1(1) April: 23-44. Pertierra, R,, Ugarte E, Pingol, A.;Hernandez, J. and N. Dacanay. (2002) TXT-ing Selves: Cellphones and Philippine Modernity, De La Salle University Press, Manila, Philippines. Rafferty, J., and Wilkinson, A. (1992). New technology in the human services: An equaliser of opportunities? New Technology in the Human Services, Vol.6, No.2, Summer. Rapp, L. A., Dulmus, C. N., Wodarski, J. S., & Felt, M. D. (1998). Integrated human service delivery system: public welfare model. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 22 (2), 151-160. Relan, A. (1997). Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: Similarities and differences. In Khan, B. H. (Ed.). Web-based instruction. NJ: Educational Techology Publications Incorporated, 41-46. Reamer, F. (1986). The use of modern technology in social work: Ethical dilemmas. Social Work, 31, (6), November-December, 469-476. Resnick, H., Sherer, M. (1994). Computer games in the human services- a review. Computers in Human Services, Vol.11, No 1/2. Resnick, H. (Ed.) (1994). Electronic tools for social work practice & education. New York: Haworth Press. Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., Reedy, C. S. (2005) Online surveys for BGLT research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Homosexuality, 49, 2, pp. 1-21.

16

Robert Wood Johnson Portfolios. Cell Phones Give Researchers a Window on Young Mothers' Parenting Practices - Leads to NIH Funded Study. http://www.rwjf.org/portfolios/resources/grantsreport.jsp?filename=037224.htm&iaid=144 Last updated December 2004. Robson, D., Robson, M. (1998). Intimacy and computer communication. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol.26, No.1, 33-41. Rock, B. D., Beckerman, A., Auerbach, C., Cohen, C., Goldstein, M. & Quitkin, E. (1995). Management of alternate level of care patients using a computerized database. Health & Social Work, 20 (2), 133-139. Rock, B. & Congress, E. (1999). The new confidentiality for the 21st century in a managed care environment. Social Work, 44 (3), 253-262. Root, L.S. (1996). Computer conferencing in a decentralized program: an occupational social work example. Administration in Social Work, 20 (1), 31-45. Rosenheck, R. A. (2002). Organizational process: a missing link between research and practice. Psychiatric Services, 62, 1607-1612. Satterwhite, R. and Schoech, D. (1995). Multimedia training for child protective service workers: Initial test results. In Rafferty, J., Steyaert, J. and Columbi, D. (Eds.). Human services in the information age. NY: Haworth Press, 81-97. Schein-Levi, J. & Pollack, D. (1997). Social work, parenting, and the Web. Journal of Family Social Work, 2 (3), 5-16. Schneider, S. J., Cantor, D., Malakhoff, L., Arieira, C., Segel, P., Nguyen, K.-L., Guarino Tancreto, J. (2005) Telephone, Internet, and Paper Data Collection Modes for the Census 2000 Short Form. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 1, pp. 89-101. Schoech, D., Fitch, D., MacFadden, R., & Schkade, L. (2001). From data to intelligence: introducing the intelligent organization. Administration in Social Work, Volume 26, Number 1, 1-21. Schoech, D. (1999). Human services technology: Understanding, designing and Implementing computer and internet applications. NY: Haworth. Schoech, D., Jensen, C., Fulks, J. & Smith, K. K. (1998). Developing and using a community databank. Computers in Human Services, 15 (1), 35-54. Schoech, D. (1982). Computer use in human services. New York: Human Sciences Press. Schonlau, M., Fricker, R.D. Jr and Elliott, M.N. (2001), Conducting Research Surveys via E-Mail and the Web, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

17

Schopler J. H., Abell, M. D., & Galinsky, M. J. (1998). Technology-based groups: a review and conceptual framework for practice. Social Work, 43 (3), 254-267. Schwartz, M. (Ed.) (1983). Using computers in clinical practice. New York: Haworth Press. Selber, S. A. (2004) Multiliteracies for a Digital Age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press. Severson,H.H., E. G. Feil, T. Taylor. Parent Net. http://www.ori.org/Research/scientists/seversonH.html (Retrieved 13 Feb 2006) Sharron, H. (1984). The ghost in the machine. Social Work Today, 15: 21, 14-17. Slavin, S. (Ed.) (1982). Applying computers in social service & mental health agencies. New York: Haworth Press. Sloboda, Z. S. S. (2002). A Discussion of the Concept of Technology Transfer of ResearchBased Drug "Abuse" Prevention and Treatment Interventions. Substance Use & Misuse, 37(8-10), 1079-1087. Smith, L. (2003). Internet use among people with HIV/AIDS. New Technology in the Human Services. Vol. 22 (2), 17-29. Special Issue: Designing for the mobile device: experiences, challenges, and methods. (2005). Communications of the ACM 48(7), July. Steyaert, J. (1995). Challenges of the internet for social workers. New Technology in the Human Services. Vol. 8, No.3. Stoddard, J. L., Delucchi, K. L., Muñoz, R. F., Collins, M., Pérez-Stable, E. J., Augustson, E., Lenert, L. L. (2005) Smoking Cessation Research via the Internet: A Feasibility Study. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 1, pp. 27-41. Stoecker, R. and Stuber, A. C. S. (1997). Limited access: the information superhighway and Ohio's neighborhood-based organizations. Computers in human services, 14 (1), 39-57. Sussman, M. (Ed.) (1985). Personal computers and the family. New York: Haworth Press. Tait, A. (1999). Face-to-Face and at a distance: The mediation of guidance and counseling through the new technologies. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol. 27, No.1, 113-122. Tate, D., Zabinski, M. (2004). Computer and Internet applications for psychological treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 60(2), 209-220.

18

Tichon, J., Shapiro, M. (2003). With a little help from my friends: Children, the Internet and social support. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 21(4), 73-92. Tompkins, P. L. & Southward, L. H. (1998). Geographic Information Systems (GIS): implications for promoting social and economic justice. Computers in Human Services, 15 (2/3), 209-226. Watson, M. (1997). The Internet as a virtual social work library. New Technology in the Human Services. Weaver, D., Moses, T., Furman, W., Lindsey, D. (2003). The effects of computerization on public child welfare practice. Journal of Social Service Research. 29(4), 67-80. Weinberg, N., Shmale, J., Uken, J., & Wessel, K. (1996). Online help: cancer patients participate in a computer-mediated support group. Health & Social Work, 21(1), 24-29. Yaffe, J., Gotthoffer, D. (2001). Social Work on the Net. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

19

Related Documents