The Sexual Education And Counseling Needs Of Cancer Patients: Are They Being Met?

Sexual Education

Running head: THE SEXUAL EDUCATION NEEDS OF CANCER PATIENTS

The Sexual Education and Counseling Needs of Cancer Patients: Are They Being Met?

Travis Sky Ingersoll

1

Sexual Education

2

Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of many types of cancer can deeply affect an individual’s sense of sexuality. This research paper documents the many physical and psychological effects on patients’ sexuality that cancer and its treatment engender. The educational and counseling needs of cancer patients are discussed, and the available programs aimed at assisting medical professionals in addressing those needs are reviewed. The success of medical health professionals in assessing, providing information for, and treating the sexual health issues of cancer patients is examined. This paper concludes with suggestions to better meet the sexual health needs of cancer patients in the future.

Sexual Education

3

The Educational Needs of Cancer Patients: Are They Being Met? The diagnosis of cancer is often a traumatic event, affecting many aspects of a person’s life. A person’s sexual health, in particular, is an area that is often affected for years after treatment has ended (Fleming & Kleinbart, 2001). Sexual health not only encompasses the physiological aspects, but also the states of mental, social and emotional well-being relating to sexuality (Katz, 2005). When a person’s physical appearance is altered by cancer, their self perceptions of attractiveness, worthiness, and ability to engage in sexual activities may be negatively impacted (Mick, Hughes, & Cohen, 2004). Cancer and its treatment may bring along with it a variety of sexual health problems. Prostate cancer may lead to erectile dysfunctions, orgasmic disruption, and loss of ability to ejaculate (Perez, Skinner et al. 2002; Martinez, 2005). Gynecological cancer’s effects often include the early onset of menopause, vaginal dryness and atrophy (Bourgeois-Law, & Lotocki, 1999; Ferrell, Smith et al., 2003). Both men treated for testicular cancer and women treated for breast cancer have been found to experience body image problems, relationship difficulties, feelings of loss of control, and have their concepts of femininity and masculinity threatened. In addition they may experience a loss of desire and/or sexual arousal, decreased genital sensitivity, or increased pain during intercourse (Fleming, & Kleinbart, 2000; Jongker-Pool, Hoekstra et al., 2004; Scott, Halford, & Ward, 2004; Wimberly, Carver et al., 2005). The negative consequences of cancer and its treatment not only affects the sexuality of the person who has cancer, but also their intimate partners. Many studies have

Sexual Education

4

emphasized the protective role that the partners of cancer patients play in their healthy recovery from cancer treatment. The ability to maintain intimate relationships plays an important role, by helping to buffer an individual from the negative psychological effects that the sexual health problems associated with cancer may bring about (Bourgeois-Law, & Lotocki, 1999; Fleming, & Kleinbart, 2001; Helgeson, & Cohen, 1996; Perez, Skinner et al., 2005; Scott, Halford, & Ward, 2004; Wimberly, Carver et al., 2005) Research indicates that for those in committed relationships, the partner’s acceptance of their bodies, and how a partner responds to their health conditions are major factors in their psychosocial recovery (Bourgeois-Law, & Lotocki, 1999; Ferrell, Smith et al., 2003). Having emotional support is a crucial component in the improvement of affect, adjustment, and overall quality of life for many cancer patients. It is also a strong predictor of emotional, marital, and sexual satisfaction (Fleming, & Kleinbart, 2001; Helgeson, 2005; Helgeson, & Cohen, 1996; Scott, Halford, & Ward, 2004). Cancer patients and their significant others would undeniably benefit from counseling and comprehensive discourse pertaining to the challenges facing their sexuality. To meet these important needs, there exists a variety of curriculum available for health care professionals to utilize. The ALARM, PLEASURE, PLISSIT, and BETTER educational models can all be extremely useful to health care providers when confronted with the sexual health concerns of their patients. Common themes incorporated within these models include; bringing up and giving patients permission to discuss sexuality; explaining sexuality as an integral aspect of healthy living; communicating that issues surrounding sexuality can be brought up at any time; reviewing and combating the sexual side effects of treatment, and referring patients to sex therapists (Anderson, 1990; Annon,

Sexual Education

5

1974; Krebs, 2001; Mick, Hughes, & Cohen, 2003; Mick, Hughes et al., 2004; Shell, 2001). To specifically address the issues of partners of cancer patients there exists a program titled CanCope. CanCope is an intervention designed by Scott, Halfield, and Ward (2004) aimed at helping couples work together to cope with cancer and support each other. CanCope has produced significant increases in observable supportive communication. It has also been found to lessen the chance that individuals in an intimate partnership will distance themselves from each other. CanCope is the first intervention shown to enhance sexual intimacy, sexual self-schema, and women’s perceptions of their partner’s acceptance of their body. With the abundance of literature documenting the possible sexual health concerns of cancer patients and their significant others, and with a wide selection of curriculum available for health care professionals to help assess sexual functioning and assist in the sexual recovery from certain types of cancer, one could surmise that those needs are being met. Unfortunately this is not the case. In the words of an ovarian cancer survivor, “Sexuality? No one seems to want to talk about this topic because I don’t feel that many doctors feel comfortable, or have the necessary information” (Ferrell, Smith et al., 2003, p. 647). In fact, literature gleaned from many academic and scientific disciplines mirror this sentiment. Many cancer patients have been found to prefer that their physician’s discuss with them how sexuality may be affected by their medical treatment. Instead of addressing their issues, the physician often suggests that they see a sexual therapist. What the patient often desires is simply the provision of sexual education, so they often refuse to be seen

Sexual Education

6

by a sex therapist (Bourgeois-Law, and Lotocki, 1999; Vincent et al., 1975). Physician’s discomfort discussing topics of sexuality is well documented (Bourgeois-Law, and Lotocki, 1999; Finlay, 2001; Hordern, 2000; Katz, 2005; Schover, 1999b). The discomfort surrounding topics of sexuality and the refusal of many cancer patients to be seen by a sexual therapist, translates into a situation where pertinent information regarding the sexual concerns of people is not being communicated. In a study by Bourgeois-Law and Lotocki (1999), nearly 50% of respondents stated that little or no information was presented about the possible effects of cancer treatment on sexuality, and for the remaining percentage that were given such information, most were not satisfied with the amount received. Of the cancer patients interviewed, the greatest priorities of need were education about how their sexuality may be effected by treatment, how to prepare for the feelings that may come up surrounding the effects of treatment and cancer, and dealing with the partner’s feelings in reaction to cancer and treatment. Young-McCaughan (1996) found that 81.8% of women treated for breast cancer reported that their medical providers had never even broached the subject of sexuality concerns. This neglect of providing sexuality information useful in the recovery of breast cancer patients was also cited by Fleming and Kleinbart (2001). Findings also suggest that the sexual health information needs are not being adequately met for a large percentage of women with gynecological cancer. Services addressing the effects of treatment on sexual relationships and on individual’s sense of sexuality was also found to be lacking (Bourgeois-Law, & Lotocki, 1999). Jonker-Pool, Hoekstra et al. (2004) found that over half of the interviewed patients with testicular cancer were dissatisfied with the support and information they received

Sexual Education

7

concerning sexuality. In a study addressing the sexual problems many women experience as a result of ovarian cancer treatment, the lack of comfort presenting such problems to doctors, and the doctor’s lack of initiative bringing up the topic were significant barriers to overcoming such issues (Ferrell, Smith et al., 2003). The high levels of dissatisfaction with the lack of sexual information received, and the general discomfort that cancer patients may feel towards bringing up such a topic, suggests that medical staff may need to be more pro-active in addressing topics of sexuality, either before or after treatment (Bourgeois-Law, & Lotocki, 1999; Ferrell, Smith et al., 2003). The need for physicians to initiate more discussions about sexuality with their cancer patients, coupled with the overall lack of comfort discussing such topics that many physician’s feel, calls attention to an important dilemma. How do we help health care professionals become more comfortable bringing up topics of sexuality with their patients? One obvious way in which to address this problem is by providing curriculum to medical students and professionals, aimed at raising awareness of patient’s sexuality problems after radical treatments for cancer. In an article by Finlay (2001), a half day curriculum given to undergraduate medical students in the U.K., focused on doing just that. The curriculum presented to the students included various topics such as; the importance of respect for an individual patient’s perception of self; the impact of treatment on patient’s body image; depression as a result of body image disturbances; various cancer treatments and their effects on sexuality; and how to give patients the opportunity to discuss sexual concerns. Evaluations by questionnaires five months after the course’s conclusion indicated a significant positive impact on medical student

Sexual Education attitudes toward addressing sexuality concerns with patients. Although I performed an extensive search trying to locate such an educational intervention for medical students here in the United States, I was unable to find any such program. To me, all of the literature pertaining to the sexual education and counseling needs of cancer patients exposes a significant need for mandatory sexual education curriculum to be included in every medical school. With cancer patients tending to look to their physicians regarding their sexual health concerns, and with physicians often feeling too uncomfortable to discuss such topics, how else are we to solve the problem without making sexuality education training mandatory for medical students? Another avenue to explore, with regards to providing comprehensive sexual health interventions to cancer patients, would be the employment of sexual health professionals in medical and/or cancer treatment centers. This would not only provide a valuable resource for cancer patients as well as medical professionals, but answer another issue stated by physicians regarding questions as to why sexual education needs are often neglected; a lack of time (Bourgeois, & Lotocki, 1999; Flemming, & Kleinbart, 2000). Research proved unfruitful when I searched for examples of sexual health professionals being a part of medical centers or treatment teams. With so much need for sexuality educators, counselors and therapists in medical training institutes and treatment centers, it is unbelievable to me that the provision of curriculum about medical patient’s sexuality concerns is not mandatory for medical students. I am also surprised at the lack of evidence of employed sexual health professionals within cancer treatment centers. However, my findings point to an area where my skills as a highly trained sexual educator should be in high demand. Perhaps

8

Sexual Education

9

our society is moving in a direction where human sexuality professionals and the unique skills they possess will be utilized more frequently by the medical field. I believe that medical professionals and the patients they serve would benefit greatly by making human sexuality professionals a permanent part of medical treatment teams and medical training institutions. Whether or not human sexuality education becomes more mainstream in the near future, the important issues surrounding the inadequacy of the medical field to address the sexual health concerns of cancer patients needs to be addressed.

References Anderson, B.L. (1990). How cancer affects sexual functioning. Oncology, 4, 81-88. Annon, J. (1974). The behavioral treatment of sexual problems. Honolulu, HI: Enabling Systems. Bourgeois-Law, G., & Lotocki, R. (1999). Sexuality and gynecological cancer: A needs assessment. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 8, 231-241. Ferrell, B.R., Smith, S.L., Ervin, K.S., Itano, J., & Melancon, C. (2003). A qualitative analysis of social concerns of women with ovarian cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 12, 647663. Finlay, I.G. (2001). Teaching medical students about the impact of radical treatments on patients’ sexuality. Medical Teacher, 23, 417-421. Fleming, M.P., & Kleinbart, E. (2001). Breast cancer and sexuality. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 26, 215-224. Gamel, C., Hengeveld, M., & Davis, B. (2000). Informational needs about the effects

Sexual Education

10

of gynecological cancer on sexuality: A review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 9, 678-688. Helgeson,V.S. (2005). Recent advances in psychological oncology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 268-271. Helgeson, V.S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychology, 15, 135-148. Hughes, M. (2000). Sexuality and the cancer survivor: A silent coexistence. Cancer Nursing, 23, 477-482. Jonker-Pool, G., Hoekstra, H.J., Imhoff, G.W., Sonneveld, D.J.A., Sleijfer, D.T., Driel, M.F., Koops, H.S., & Wiel, B.M. (2004). Male sexuality after cancer treatment-needs for information and support: Testicular cancer compared to malignant lymphoma. Patient Education and Counseling, 52, 143-150. Katz, A. (2005). Do ask, do tell. American Journal of Nursing, 105, 66-68. Kornblith, A.B., Herr, H.W., Ofman, U.S., Scher, H.I., & Holland, J.C. (1994). Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses: The value of a data base in clinical care. Cancer, 73, 2791-2802. Krebs, L.U. (2001). Cancer nursing: Principles and practice (5th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. Martinez, R. (2005). Prostate cancer and sex. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy, 9, 91-99. McKee, A.L., & Schover, L. (2001). Sexuality rehabilitation. Cancer, 92 (4 Suppl.), 1008-1012.

Sexual Education

11

Mick, J., Hughes, M., & Cohen, M.Z. (2003). Sexuality and cancer: How oncology nurses can address it BETTER [Abstract 180]. Oncology Nursing Forum, 30(2 Suppl.), 152-153. Mick, J., Hughes, M., & Cohen, M.Z. (2004). Using the BETTER model to assess sexuality. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 8, 84-86. Penson, R.T., Gallagher, J., Gioiella, M.E., Wallace, M., Borden, K., Duska, L.A., Talcott, J. A., McGovern, F.J., Appleman, L.J., Chabner, B.A. & Lynch, T.J. (2000). Sexuality and the comfort zone. The Oncologist, 5, 336-344. Perez, M.A., Skinner, E.C., & Meyerowitz, B.E. (2002). Sexuality and intimacy following radical prostatectomy patient and partner perspectives. Health Psychology, 21, 288-293. Schover, L.R. (1999a). Sexuality & cancer: For the woman who has cancer, and her partner. New York: American Cancer Society. Scott, J.L., Halford, W.K., & Ward, B.G. (2004). United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1122-1135. Shell, J.A. (2001). Impact of cancer on sexuality. Oncology Nursing (4th ed., pp. 973999). St. Louis, MO: Mosby. Vincent, C.E., Vincent, B., Greiss, F.C., & Linton, E.B. (1975). Some marital-sexual concomitants of carcinoma of the cervix. Southern Medical Journal, 68, 552-558. Wimberly, S.R., Carver, C.S., Laurensceau, J., Harris, S.D., & Antoni, M.H. (2005). Pereived partner reactions to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: Impact on psychosocial and psychosexual adjustment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical

Sexual Education

12

Psychology, 73, 300-311. Young-McCaughan, S. (1996). Sexual functioning in women with breast cancer after treatment with adjuvant therapy. Cancer Nursing, 19 (4),308-319.