Testimony Hb476 Edr

  • Uploaded by: Common Cause Maryland
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Testimony Hb476 Edr as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 203
  • Pages: 1
February 19, 2009 HB 476 – Election Day Registration – SUPPORT Madam Chair and Members of the Committee: Judging by its success in nine other states, there are hundreds of thousands of reasons to support Election Day registration –the hundreds of thousands of new voters it creates. Consider voter turnout from the 2008 presidential election: STATE Minnesota Wisconsin Maine New Hampshire Iowa Colorado Michigan Alaska Missouri Oregon Maryland

TURNOUT 78.20% 72.50% 71.40% 71.30% 69.90% 69.80% 68.90% 68.30% 68.10% 67.80% 67.70%

EDR? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

The top five states in the country all used Election Day registration, and boasted on average a ten-point lead in turnout over the national average. These states were not first tier battleground states. For Common Cause, this reform matters because we believe government works better when more people participate in the democratic process. Candidates win with stronger mandates, and perhaps feel more accountable to the voters who elected them. This reform has been tested and proven, and its time has come. A constitutional referendum will be a zero-cost way to start the discussion, leaving plenty of time for our election administrators to prepare to put it into effect in the years ahead. Sincerely,

Ryan O’Donnell Executive Director

Related Documents

Testimony Hb476 Edr
June 2020 3
Hb476 Vote
June 2020 0
Core V2 0 + Edr
August 2019 25
Testimony
November 2019 45
Testimony
November 2019 50
Sridhar Testimony
June 2020 21

More Documents from ""