Taking Liberties.

Taking Liberties by Philip Jones 14

th

April 2009

How to catch wild pigs. You start by putting out food for them in the same spot every day. In a few weeks you put up one side of a fence. After they get used to eating next to the fence you put up a second, then a third. Finally you put up the last side with a gate. Eventually, without even realizing it, the pigs have become fenced in and dependent on you for their food and protection. Building Fences. All around us today, governments are building invisible fences. Constructing our `open` prisons and erecting those fences around us while we sleep walk into servitude. Of course there is nothing new in this, and from a modern standpoint, the beginnings of our incarceration can be said to have truly begun with the creation of that most deceptive of social `innovations` the Welfare State. The caption above outlines the methods used to create our mass dependency very adeptly, so I see no reason to embellish such a concise summary of our plight with unnecessary verbosity. Suffice to say, we are proverbially `up a creak without a paddle`. So what is the answer? We cannot reasonably expect now, this late in the day, any sudden interest in individual rights by either government or the opposition parties, as without exception, all are `up to their necks` in it. Sponsored, controlled, and mere puppets of their Illuminati masters, they have been chiseling away at our personal freedoms for years, and therefore have, if they ever had any in the first place, lost all credibility. Taking my own sad country as an example, the root of the problem is that we British are no longer masters in our own land. Only a complete withdrawal from the European Union could now restore at least some of those freedoms taken from us. We are told repeatedly that such a course of action would harm our trading relations with the Europeans, wreck our economy, and cause massive unemployment etc. But would it? Norway and Switzerland enjoy excellent trading relations with the EU and so would we. And there is still an English speaking world out there. A world with vast trade and commercial possibilities and with which we have far more in common, than we do with our artificially created relations with our European neighbours. Secession. Having established the Luciferian's goal of creating a One World State in my previous article `The Global Coup d'Etat` (see reference) and that the European Union is a major stepping stone towards that goal of world government, then it can be asserted that in order to avert such a disastrous outcome, exiting `Europe` is a prerequisite in order for the British people and those of the other member states to avoid complete and total enslavement in the very near future. But such a move would entail boldness, courage, imagination, patriotism and integrity along with the will to undertake such a historic mission. Sadly, the collective leaders of the UK and the rest of Europe for that matter, are of the same ilk, Europhile, Federalist and in the final analysis, `One World Illuminist` traitors, in thrall to Lucifer and his promises of wealth and advantage. It is therefore unlikely that we can expect anytime soon national politicians, corrupted by the lure of financial inducements and the promise of jobs in Brussels, which pay lucrative salaries far and above that which they receive at home, to lobby for the exiting of their country from the twenty seven headed monster known as the European Union.

Deeply Marxist in ideology, the federalists use the `Frankfurt School's` Critical Theory strategy in order to vilify those who are opposed to continued membership, labeling them as `anti european`, xenophobic, and ironically, dangerous, fascist and nationalist, thereby quelling open debate. This is a common and well worn Communist Ruse to suffocate free speech. These ideas have been internalised by the Illuminists, and in it's attempts to silence all opposition, the EU is knowingly following a script which runs parallel to the party line laid down by the Moscow Central Committee in 1943: “Members and front organisations must continually embarrass discredit and degrade our critics. When obstructionists become too irritating, label them as fascist, or Nazi or Anti Semite...The association will after enough repetition become fact in the public mind”. Within a so called free society such as the UK, one might expect the Judges to have stood as the defenders of liberty, but sadly, that has not been the case. Many if not most of them have been carefully selected and are of the same mind as those other purveyors of treachery in the House Of Commons, who together with Brussels are making all those intrusive laws which are destroying `piecemeal` the ancient liberties the people of Britain have taken for granted for centuries. Liberties quite foreign to those in mainland Europe. By allowing judges to determine the moral and social framework of people's lives, instead of relying on the precedents of the English Common Law, together with their `lordship's` implementation of foreign legislation such as the `Human Rights Act`, utter confusion and a forlorn sense of demoralisation is engendered amongst the native population, who feel ever more helpless and friendless, in a world gone mad. Up until recently, there was one body at least which seemed to have the wisdom, experience, independence and broad perspective to act as custodians of the people's liberties and here I speak of the House Of Lords. However, since that once esteemed house's abject desertion of the British people in 2004, when contrary to all the promises given to the thousands who wrote in begging they refuse to pass the severely draconian `Civil Contingencies` Bill, pass it they did. The writing was on the wall. The people were left defenseless as even that last bastion of British democracy fell to perverse forces. Democracy or Theatre For The Masses. What passes for democracy in the West should not be confused with true democracy where people have a meaningful say in their lives and those things that affect those lives, as in the Swiss Cantons for example. The so called democracy we see throughout the EU, the US, Canada and the other developed nations is nothing more than `Theater For The Masses`. Every four of five years, we the people are asked to choose between political parties of the liberal center, all with communitarian credentials, all at the leadership level dedicated to the Illuminist Agenda, committed to high taxation in order to bleed away the individual wealth of the private citizen, and to a large degree of state interference in people's private lives. Taking this into account, along with the fact that most `democratically elected` governments win office on less that fifty per cent of the votes cast, laws that interfere with personal liberty should be kept to a minimum. Societies consist these days of vastly different types of people, and demanding conformity and uniformity of thought and action should be seen for what it is, abhorrent and fascist, but increasingly, laws are being passed which do just that, controlling and boxing people into a desired, designed and conformist way of life. The law is there for us, not we for it. Provided we don't harm others, it should leave us alone. But it doesn't and it won't. Democracy is generally regarded as the safest form of government, but it is not sufficient in itself to protect the liberty of individuals. There must be a vast reduction in the power of government to

micromanage our lives. It is clear that the tyranny of the mob can be as harmful as that of a despot. As President Thomas Jefferson once remarked, “Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner”. Any government, no matter what form it takes, must above all else give respect to the liberty of the private citizen, and recognise that that a person's private life is above and beyond it's auspices, except in the most extreme of circumstances. Tolerance must be the guiding principal in a diverse and democratic society, and there must be no place for the social engineering instincts of the communitarian's and liberals who are so expert and well versed now in dictating to whole populations how they should think and behave. People must learn once again to take responsibility for their own lives and wrench it out of the hands of government. Any decent and just society must be a well informed and free thinking one. But with their `lockdown` control of all the organs of the state, and by the no longer subtle indoctrination of our children in the classroom, combined with incessant programming of all our minds by television, radio, newspapers, pop music and a multitude of other means, the Illuminists are able to twist people's minds to their own perverse agenda, closing down the ability to think critically and thereby making any semblance of what's left of democracy in a given society little more than a charade and meaningless. “I know of no other country in which speaking generally, there is less independence of mind and true freedom of discussion than in America”. Alex de Tocqueville 19th Century writer. The Home Of The Brave. One wonders what de Tocqueville would make of the present situation in the `land of the free`. The almost addictive watching of `mindnumbing` television glorifying all manner of corruption, perversion and violence. The millions being unwittingly programmed and conditioned to think a certain way by fraudulently based psychiatric `mumbo jumbo` and `fleeced` of their hard earned dollars by psychiatrists and psychologists who in the whole history of their so called `science` have never been able to record a `cure`. When combined with all the impediments to free thought that are caused by Political Correctness, we are looking at a `dumbed down` and `cowed` society the like of which could never have been envisaged only fifty years ago. But it is erroneous in the extreme to point the finger at America, and single out that proud land and people as being alone in all of this. The situation is endemic throughout what we call the Western Nations and all of the above conditions are more or less universally present. Out Of Chaos Order. In our 21st century `democracies`, issues are simplified and made superficial, hence the ruse is propagated that there is a clear demarcation between the liberals on one side and the conservatives on the other, whilst both sides seek to use the law to impose the same narrow Illuminist agenda on the population. As the saying goes; “No matter whom you vote for, the Government always gets in”. In this apparent struggle between two intolerant `opposames` , there is no consideration for the rights of the citizen, who finds himself/herself bullied by laws made only to further the Illuminist Agenda. And while to the bewildered populace, who are told by the `legislators and politicians that these laws are made to reform the law in order to ostensibly better their lot, it appears that they are in reality enacted for the sole purpose of ramming one or another dogma or prejudice down the collective throats. Both conclusions are however incorrect. When one becomes aware of the deceptive tactics employed by the Illuminists, it is all so clear. As the Freemasonic Motto goes, “ORDO AB CHAO” or “Out Of Chaos Order”.

What is happening is no evolutionary social phenomenon. It has been in the works for centuries, even millenia and is now approaching it's intended realisation. What is so dangerous about the current model of democracy or as it should be termed `social democracy` is that people are indoctrinated into believing that they are a part of the process, when in truth, the only role they play in the drama is to cast their vote once every four or five years in a fake contest between political parties that are is essence almost identical. It is this charade which enables the State to pass the increasingly draconian laws that violate personal freedom. A politician, bureaucrat or judge who uses coercive authoritarian laws to subdue and oppress a citizen is no less a tyrant for being invested with a `democratic` mandate for doing so. The place to begin the liberating of the people is within the mind of each individual. Men and women must be true to themselves and not the state. It is time for people to wake up and realise that there is no longer any correlation between legality and morality. We live in an age when it is perfectly legal to murder a baby in it's mother's womb, but a crime to smoke a cigarette in public. It will soon be legal (if it isn't already) for fourteen year olds to practice sodomy, but not to learn to drive. Our dictatorial regimes, for that is what they are, give out the message that murder is alright in circumstances which do not offend the liberal conscience, which explains why the likes of General Pinochet are hounded and arrested for acts allegedly committed in Chile, whilst Marxist Dictators like Mugabe go free and unmolested. The `law` is little more than total moral confusion, which is as it is intended to be. To this writer and surely to those able to see through the mists of propagated confusion, the only force behind the law which remains, is as `Austin` wrote “purely physical not moral”. An example of this lack of a moral compass is the case of the anti abortion activist who some years ago shot dead an abortionist in Pensacola Florida. The State demanded the death penalty for the crime. In this sad and tragic case, there were three killings, two legal and one illegal. The abortion is deemed legal. The murder of the abortionist illegal, and then the state slaughters the activist which again is considered legal. But there is a bizarre aspect to this when one considers that the abortionist killed for a living and often, whilst the activist killed only once for a cause believed to be just. I do not condone the killing of anyone, but there is an element of moral imbalance here. Getting Away With Murder; Recently there have been several reported cases of women killing husbands and then receiving only short suspended sentences. For any wife who kills her husband, it would appear that the trick is to claim persistent violent abuse on the part of the deceased, who being dead cannot defend himself. The almost certain result will be that the court, completely in thrall to feminist dogma, will conclude that the long suffering wife had sufficient reason for her actions. Then with her husband conveniently gone, and with freedom hers to enjoy, she is able to marry her boyfriend, or considering the strange and perverse times we live in, her girlfriend. A half century ago, she would have hung for her crime, but today, the courts are intimidated and cowed by the knowledge that even a custodial sentence would unleash a venomous attack from feminist journalists and notables nationwide. Who says crime doesn't pay? Within two years of July 1998, the British government released it's full compliment of IRA murderers. The then Prime Minister, `Phoney` Blair justified his actions on the shoddy grounds that it would ensure peace in that troubled province. Well, that `peace was shattered well and truly in Omagh in August of that same year. But, in the `New Order` of things, if the politics are right, anything is justifiable.

Morality versus Legality. Our Secular Laws are now so far removed from moral considerations, that the time has come for people to again turn to the Holy Scriptures, and then take moral guidance from it's pages as to what is right and what is wrong. I have long believed that this breakdown in our moral order can be clearly attributed to the loss in faith and belief in Christianity throughout what was once called Christendom, and that only a rebirth and flowering of this belief in the great wisdom provided by the Bible will prevent an apocalyptic collapse of our civilisation. Love of liberty must prevail over an indoctrinated and misguided respect for authority. As Lord Devlin, a former British `law lord` stated, “There is no longer a moral obligation to obey the law in all circumstances”. The Designed Imbalance. Throughout the West, we see a complete lack of equilibrium in the relationship between crime and punishment. Petty and ridiculous misdemeanors carry heavier penalties than serious felonies in many cases and this has resulted in a breakdown in respect for the law. With the awesome powers which have been handed to the Police this past decade, they are now more feared than respected. As a former Police Officer, who retired thirteen years ago, I speak from experience. Edmund Burke said, “Good Order is the foundation of all good things”, and he was right. But over the past quarter century, it has become apparent that disorderly, immoral and violent behaviour has been fostered and nurtured by successive governments for a reason. When they had the opportunity to do something positive to combat the rise in crime and decline in morality, governments sat back and did nothing but talk about what they were going to do. Remember the Freemasonic Motto, “Out Of Chaos Order”. This is the Hegelian Dialectic in full flow. Sponsor a situation that will demand a response, then give that predetermined response, or as David Icke terms it `Problem Reaction Solution`, and this has been `in play` for as long as I can remember and certainly during the fifteen years I served in the force. The lack of any obvious reason for the mass of laws flowing from Brussels and elsewhere around the world has alienated millions. The more rules and regulations which violate people's freedom, the more the law will be broken. It is inevitable. One can barely sit at home in one's armchair these days without impinging on some petty diktat or another. In effect, as stated above, governments will be faced with a situation of widespread disorder, even anarchy, which will be of their own creation, and which as the creation of the `Euro Gendermerie` proves, they expect and are ready for. We must combat State interference in our lives on all fronts. Our liberty, or what remains of it, will only continue if the general and guiding principal against the intrusion of law into private matters is acknowledged and enshrined in acceptance universally. We cannot be selective in this matter. Our cause will not go forward if on the one hand we say we do not want social workers to have the power to force entry into our homes and dictate to us how we raise our children, but yes, we do think it okay for Police to break down doors in some alleged search for weapons, explosives or drugs. That is how we are divided and ruled. They play us off against each other so that we just cannot see the bigger picture. We must always remember that laws are not made for our benefit. Their primary purpose is to control our lives increasingly whilst taking away ever greater portions of our personal wealth and property. We must not identify ourselves with the state. It is and has always been them and us. We are forever being told that laws are for the greater public good. All tyrannies throughout human history have used terms like this to justify the implementation of laws hostile to individual rights. There is a defined conflict of interest between `community interests` and individual rights. Abstract Rights. We are today bombarded by `rights`. These rights rarely if ever apply to the majority population and

are designed to cause further division, fracture and resentment in society. This explosion in “rights” has eroded to an amazing degree personal liberty, and created an atmosphere of suspicion and fear in the normal interactions between citizens. These rights come in all shapes and sizes and include `the right to choose`, minority rights, women's rights, gay rights, and any other `rights `they can think of to further beat down the majority into submission. The `chattering class` liberals so fond of promoting these rights, have little or no idea of their true purpose, and in their mindless enthusiasm ignore all practical consequences. And of course, the louder they talk about these `rights`, the less of them we seem to have. I maintain here and now that we the people have an inalienable right to be allowed to live in peace and make our own decisions affecting our lives, without state interference. But, and this is a big one, the `Law` no longer allows us to do this. For us to keep what's left of our dignity and independence of thought, we must keep our eye on `the ball` and not mistake the signals coming from government, nor the lies that are used to justify their nefarious attacks on our personal liberty. We cannot afford to look at law in isolation as each new piece of legislation is just another step towards the `open prison` our lives are becoming. Those who make the laws have but contempt for the individual but maintain a certain regard for the `Herd` providing it does as it is told. The private citizen is just someone they bleed dry through taxation and the multitude of pernicious `fines` for petty traffic offences etc.. He/she is someone to strip of his/her rights, to be used as `cannon fodder` in wars of aggression against innocent people in far off lands and then deceive with more lies come election day. Every little law passed is part of the whole, with the ultimate goal being to reduce the individual by both legal and technological means to a passive thoughtless compliant zombie to be controlled and manipulated. Centralisation and Globalisation. As we move ever closer to a Federal European State, North American Union and an eventual World Government, we see an ever increasing drive towards standardisation and centralisation, masked as an administrative necessity. It's main effect is to further enslave and anaesthetise the private individual. The idea is to make everyone more or less the same worldwide, so that the Illuminists, through their puppet politicians, judges, bankers and media whores are able to control the global population. This enables the `House Of Rothschild` together with the Rockefellers and to a lesser degree, the likes of Rupert Murdoch and Bill Gates to manipulate whole markets and economies. This drive towards the One World State is the ultimate enemy of individualism and freedom. Taking Responsibility. Averting disaster will not be easy. It will mean every person taking back complete responsibility for his or her own life,which is not as easy as it might appear. The writer, George Bernard Shaw said, “ Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it”. The notion that it is only government which can guide, ban, encourage or regulate our lives must be treated with utter contempt. Such a concept is unfit even for animals. People deserve better than to be bossed around and herded like sheep. The dependence which has been engendered in us by the dreadful `Welfare State` whereby we look to governments rather than ourselves for solutions and inspiration is the ultimate denial of our humanity. Slogans and Spin Doctors. Western socialist governments, cloaked in the respectability of liberalism, promote abstract notions such as `inclusion` and `diversity` as being intrinsic to a decent and humane society. But this is just a subtle and sinister way of forcing everyone into a conformity of thought and opinion. Using slogans rather than reason, they defame anyone who thinks freely, and this rare individual will experience an

intangible pressure to conform to the accepted wisdom. These slogans are always diabolically clever in construct, crafted to appeal to the superficial rather than the profound. The minds of people who have been subjected to the mass programming and propaganda of the architects of the New World Order these past fifty or so years are little more than putty in the hands of these master manipulators. The control over our minds is all the more effective due to it's sophistication and subtlety. As `de Torqueville` wrote “Democratic despotism degrades men without tormenting them”. Unlike Dr Goebbels, the Nazi Propaganda Minister, the Illuminists have used a form of seductive mass mind programming utilising all the modern means of information. They own the newspapers and television stations, record companies and film studios. They have introduced a mind bending curriculum in our schools indoctrinating our children with a `Neo Liberal` viewpoint on abortion, race, sex education, feminism, pacifism, colonialism, and the rest of their insidious, self righteous and devilish agenda. Network Solutions ? If we are to take back our freedom before it is too late, we must learn to rebel. To express our individualism in the face of the globalist conformist tidal wave which threatens to engulf the whole of humanity. If we continue to acquiesce, we will be `hammered` into conformity and obedience by a brutal, fascist and impersonal apparatus which will allow no dissent. Conclusion. The peoples of the western nations are being lead by the nose into a Police State. We are being bound and fettered by an endless barrage of intrusive and restrictive laws coming at us from every direction, or so it seems. But in reality, this attack on our lives is organised and orchestrated from a central point in the City Of London. The oppressive trend of government interference in people's lives is now universal and is top to bottom in scope; from the false and degraded `let's all be friends` tyranny of the United Nations Organisation, down to the local social worker and the whispering `nosey` neighbours. If our short lifespan here on earth is to be lived in unmolested peace, we must not be slaves of the state. We must stand firm, united as one and take back our lives, become responsible for ourselves and those we love and just say NO. Further reading and reference: The Global Coup d'Etat http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=198&Itemid=43 The Police State Road Map http://www.policestateplanning.com/id19.htm Stop Common Purpose http://www.stopcp.com/ UK Column http://www.ukcolumn.org./ The Nylon Man http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=7&Itemid=43

Global Tyranny Step by Step byWilliam F Jasper The Great Deception by Booker and North The Holy Bible.